Next Article in Journal
Thermodynamic Analysis of Wetting Transitions on Micro/Nanopillared Superhydrophobic Surfaces
Previous Article in Journal
Electrochemical Fabrication of Ni–Co Alloy over a Wide pH Range Using Sodium Citrate as a Complexing Agent
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation and Properties of Thick Tungsten Coating Electrodeposited from Na2WO4-WO3-KCl-NaF Molten Salt System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Structural Aspects and Adhesion of Polyurethane Composite Coatings for Surface Acoustic Wave Sensors

1
Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Athos da Silveira Ramos, 149 Bloco A—4° Andar—SALA 408 Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro 21941-909, RJ, Brazil
2
Institute of Microstructure Technology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen Karlsruhe, Germany
3
Institute for Applied Materials, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2025, 15(2), 139; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15020139
Submission received: 21 December 2024 / Revised: 17 January 2025 / Accepted: 20 January 2025 / Published: 24 January 2025

Abstract

Surface acoustic wave-based (SAW) sensors are of great interest due to their high sensibility and fast and stable responses. They can be obtained at an overall low cost and with an intuitive and easy-to-use method. The chemical sensitization of a piezoelectric transducer plays a key role in defining the properties of SAW sensors. In this study, we investigate the structural and adhesion properties of a new class of coating material based on polyurethane polymeric composites. We used dark-field microscopy (DFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to observe the microstructure of polyurethane composite coatings on piezoelectric sensor elements and to analyze the effects of the chemical resistance and adhesion test (CAT) on the coating layers obtained with the polyurethane polymeric composites. The results of the microscopy showed that all polyurethane composite coatings exhibited excellent uniformity and stability after chemical adherence testing (CAT). All of the observations were correlated with the results of the ultrasonic analysis, which demonstrated the role of polyurethane as a binder to form the stable structure of the composites and, at the same time, as an adhesion promoter, increasing the chemical resistance and the adherence of the coating layer to the complex surface of the piezoelectric sensor element.
Keywords: polymeric sensing layer; spin coating; polymeric thin film polymeric sensing layer; spin coating; polymeric thin film

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Carvalho, M.d.S.d.; Rapp, M.; Voigt, A.; Dirschka, M.; Geckle, U. Structural Aspects and Adhesion of Polyurethane Composite Coatings for Surface Acoustic Wave Sensors. Coatings 2025, 15, 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15020139

AMA Style

Carvalho MdSd, Rapp M, Voigt A, Dirschka M, Geckle U. Structural Aspects and Adhesion of Polyurethane Composite Coatings for Surface Acoustic Wave Sensors. Coatings. 2025; 15(2):139. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15020139

Chicago/Turabian Style

Carvalho, Mauro dos Santos de, Michael Rapp, Achim Voigt, Marian Dirschka, and Udo Geckle. 2025. "Structural Aspects and Adhesion of Polyurethane Composite Coatings for Surface Acoustic Wave Sensors" Coatings 15, no. 2: 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15020139

APA Style

Carvalho, M. d. S. d., Rapp, M., Voigt, A., Dirschka, M., & Geckle, U. (2025). Structural Aspects and Adhesion of Polyurethane Composite Coatings for Surface Acoustic Wave Sensors. Coatings, 15(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15020139

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop