Next Article in Journal
Synthetic Scaffold Systems for Increasing the Efficiency of Metabolic Pathways in Microorganisms
Previous Article in Journal
Acute Effects of Surgical and FFP2 Face Masks on Physiological Responses and Strength Performance in Persons with Sarcopenia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lymphadenopathy after BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine: Preliminary Ultrasound Findings

1
Radiology Division, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli”, 80131 Naples, Italy
2
Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology Division, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli”, 80131 Naples, Italy
3
Hospital Pharmacy Division, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli”, 80131 Naples, Italy
4
Division of Radiodiagnostic, “Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi”, 50139 Firenze, Italy
5
Division of Radiology, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80125 Naples, Italy
6
Foundation SIRM, 20122 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2021, 10(3), 214; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10030214
Submission received: 19 February 2021 / Revised: 26 February 2021 / Accepted: 9 March 2021 / Published: 11 March 2021

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Eccentric cortical thickening with wide echogenic hilum and oval shape, asymmetric eccentric cortical thickening with wide echogenic hilum and oval shape, concentric cortical thickening with reduction in the width of the echogenic hilum and oval shape, and huge reduction and displacement of the echogenic hilum and round shape are the features that we found in post BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine lymphadenopathies.

Abstract

During a spontaneous and autonomous study, we assessed the ultrasound finding of lymphadenopathy after BNT162b2 Pfizer vaccine. We enrolled 18 patients with 58 lymphadenopathies: in 10 patients, they were in the laterocervical side, while in 8 patients in the axillar site. The largest diameter was 16 mm with a range from 7 to 16 mm (median value = 10 mm). In the same patient, we found different ultrasound nodal findings. A total of 25 nodes showed eccentric cortical thickening with wide echogenic hilum and oval shape. In total, 19 nodes showed asymmetric eccentric cortical thickening with wide echogenic hilum and oval shape. Overall, 10 nodes showed concentric cortical thickening with reduction in the width of the echogenic hilum and oval shape. A total of four nodes showed huge reduction and displacement of the echogenic hilum and round or oval shape. No anomaly was found at the Doppler echocolor study. In conclusion, eccentric cortical thickening with wide echogenic hilum and oval shape, asymmetric eccentric cortical thickening with wide echogenic hilum and oval shape, concentric cortical thickening with reduction in the width of the echogenic hilum and oval shape, and a huge reduction and displacement of the echogenic hilum and round shape are the features that we found in post BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine lymphadenopathies.

1. Background

In December 2019, health authorities in Wuhan, China, identified a cluster of acute respiratory disease of unknown etiology [1]. Subsequently the researchers identified a new viral agent, SARS-CoV-2, as responsible for the heart of an international outbreak centered in Hubei. On 30 January 2020, World Health Organization (WHO) confirmed the COVID-19 epidemic as a public health emergency and on 11 March 2020 demarcated the rapid spread of infection as a pandemic in the world [1,2]. Globally, at the time of writing (17 January 2021), there have been 93,194,922 confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 2,014,729 deaths, reported to WHO. In Italy, there have been 2,368,733 confirmed cases of COVID-19 with 81,800 deaths. Up to today, effective treatment has not yet been developed so that mechanical respiratory support is the only therapy in critically ill patients [3,4,5]. In this scenario, it was necessary to develop a vaccine as soon as possible, to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 and to protect persons who are at high risk for complications. At the time of writing in Italy have been approved two vaccines: the mRNA-1273 vaccine Moderna [6] and BNT162b2 Pfizer drug [7]. In 27 December, health authorities in Italy have authorized the administration of the BNT162b2 Pfizer vaccine in healthcare personnel, defining this day as Vaccine (V)-day.
During the trial clinic on BNT162b2, vaccine data on local and systemic reactions and use of medication were collected with electronic diaries from participants in the reactogenicity subset (8183 participants) for 7 days after each vaccination [7]. Adverse event analyses are provided for all enrolled participants, with variable follow-up time after dose. More BNT162b2 recipients than placebo recipients reported any adverse event (27 and 12%, respectively) or a related adverse event (21 and 5%). A total of 64 vaccine recipients (0.3%) and 6 placebo recipients (<0.1%) reported lymphadenopathy. We assessed ultrasound (US) findings in 18 consecutive patients from healthcare personnel that reported lymphadenopathy after BNT162b2 Pfizer drug.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Population

This is a spontaneous and autonomous study, without the authorization of the ethics committee, for which patients have allowed data processing in accordance with National Privacy Regulations [8]. This observational study included the period from 27 December 2020 to 16 January 2021, the date of the last administration of the vaccine first dose among the health personnel in Campania. In this time range, 18 consecutive patients from healthcare personnel who received the first dose of BNT162b2 Pfizer vaccine were enrolled: 10 for palpable mass appeared after the vaccine, 8 sent to the ultrasound study by the pharmacovigilance physician.
In Table 1 we reported the patients study group characteristics.

2.2. US Protocol and Images Analysis

Nodes ultrasound exams were performed by dedicated radiologists, using RS85 Samsung System (Samsung Healthcare GmbH, Schwalbach, Germany) in combination with a linear 5 to 12-MHz array transducer.
A total of four in-site expert radiologists in interpretation of nodal images, recorded the data in consensus. Presence, side, size, shape, echogenicity, cortex feature, margin, and hilum of the lesions were categorized. We also assessed color doppler features.

3. Results

We assessed 18 patients with 58 lymphadenopathy after BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine.
In 10 patients (55.5%) they were in laterocervical side while 8 (44.5%) in the axillar site. The largest diameter was 16 mm with a range from 7 to 16 mm (median value = 10 mm). In the same patient we found different ultrasound nodal findings.
No anomaly was found on the Doppler echo-color study.
A total of 25 (43.1%) nodes showed eccentric cortical thickening with wide echogenic hilum and oval shape (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
Overall, 19 nodes (32.8%) showed asymmetric eccentric cortical thickening with wide echogenic hilum and oval shape (Figure 3).
A total of 10 nodes (17.2%) showed concentric cortical thickening with reduction in the width of the echogenic hilum and oval shape (Figure 1b).
In total, four nodes (6.9%) showed huge reduction and displacement of the echogenic hilum and round or oval shape (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

Recent results have revealed the efficiency of some imaging methods, including chest radiographs and chest computed tomography scans, in the management of COVID-19 disease [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Instead, at the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper describing the appearance of nodes after BNT162b2 Covid-19 vaccine. Although the onset of lymphadenopathy after vaccine is known, Polack et al reported a frequency of only 0.3% [29]. However, we think that the date may be underestimated, in consideration of our sample size, although it is a representative population of a small community. Moreover, although in 10 patients the lymph nodes were painful, in four patients the data were an occasional finding diagnosed during a US examination performed for another reason.
US is commonly regarded as the imaging modality of choice in the assessment of palpable soft-tissue abnormalities. According to the appropriateness criteria of the American College of Radiology, US is “usually appropriate” to evaluate superficial or palpable soft-tissue masses, while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is “usually appropriate” in case of non-diagnostic initial US evaluation [31], while CT is appropriate for assessment of systemic diseases [32].
Lymph node cortical thickness and uniformity are the most important criteria for distinguishing between normal and abnormal nodes. Normal lymph nodes have a reniform shape, a uniformly hypoechoic cortex with a maximal thickness of 3 mm, smooth margins, and a central fatty hilum [33]. Findings of cortical thickness in excess of 3 mm, eccentric thickening, irregular margins, and encroachment on or displacement of the fatty hilum are suggestive of a pathologic process [33].
We found different US findings in the same patient; 43.1% of lymph nodes showed eccentric cortical thickening with wide echogenic hilum and oval, 32.8% of lymph nodes showed asymmetric eccentric cortical thickening with wide echogenic hilum and oval shape. A total of 17.2% of lymph nodes showed concentric cortical thickening with reduction in the width of the echogenic hilum and oval shape and 6.9% showed huge reduction and displacement of the echogenic hilum and round or oval shape.
We believe it is important to know and recognize these structural alterations, since as soon as the vaccine will be also available to non-healthcare personnel, it is important for a radiologist to be able to identify post-vaccine lymphadenopathy compared to lymphadenopathy for another cause, especially in cancer patients.
There are multiple limitations of this work. First of all, the small and spontaneous sample, consequently we did not know the real incidence of lymphadenopathy. Second, not having performed an elastosonographic and echocontrastographic examination; finally, the absence of a pathological correlation.
Future objective is an evaluation of the entire population of our institution undergoing vaccination for a correct estimate of the incidence and a more complex ultrasound analysis.

5. Conclusions

Eccentric cortical thickening with wide echogenic hilum and oval shape, asymmetric eccentric cortical thickening with wide echogenic hilum and oval shape, concentric cortical thickening with reduction in the width of the echogenic hilum and oval shape, and huge reduction and displacement of the echogenic hilum and round shape are the features that we found in post BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine lymphadenopathies.

Author Contributions

V.G. wrote the main manuscript text. S.V.S. prepared figures. V.G., R.F., S.V.S., R.G. (Roberta Galdiero), C.P., F.I., R.D., V.M., R.G. (Roberta Grassi), R.G. (Roberto Grassi), and A.P. performed the investigations and reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

“National Cancer Institute of Naples Pascale Foundation” Institutional Review Institute (IRB) approved the study and renounced the written informed consent for this retrospective study, considering the ongoing epidemic emergency, which assessed the unidentified data and did not involve risks potential for patients.

Informed Consent Statement

Consent for publication was received.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Alessandra Trocino, librarian at the National Cancer Institute of Naples, Italy. Moreover, they are grateful to Assunta Zazzaro for the collaboration.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lake, M.A. What we know so far: COVID-19 current clinical knowledge and research. Clin. Med. 2020 20, 124–127. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/events-as-they-happen (accessed on 21 January 2021).
  3. Chaudhary, S.; Benzaquen, S.; Woo, J.G.; Rubinstein, J.; Matta, A.; Albano, J.; De Joy, R., III; Lo, K.B.; Patarroyo-Aponte, G. Clinical Characteristics, Respiratory Mechanics and Outcomes in Critically Ill Subjects with COVID-19 Infection in an Underserved Urban Population. Respir. Care 2021. [CrossRef]
  4. Zhou, S.; Xu, J.; Sun, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, F.; Zhao, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, W.; Li, Y.; Ning, K.; et al. Clinical Features for Severely and Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 in Shandong: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2021, 17, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bagherzade, M.; Parham, M.; Zohali, S.; Molaei, S.; Vafaeimanesh, J. Plasmapheresis with corticosteroids and antiviral: A life-saving treatment for severe cases of Covid 19. Caspian J. Intern. Med. 2020, 11, 572–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Baden, L.R.; El Sahly, H.M.; Essink, B.; Kotloff, K.; Frey, S.; Novak, R.; Diemert, D.; Spector, S.A.; Rouphael, N.; Creech, C.B.; et al. COVE Study Group. Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Polack, F.P.; Thomas, S.J.; Kitchin, N.; Absalon, J.; Gurtman, A.; Lockhart, S.; Perez, J.L.; Pérez Marc, G.; Moreira, E.D.; Zerbini, C.; et al. C4591001 Clinical Trial Group. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 2603–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Available online: https://www.privacy-regulation.eu/en/ (accessed on 21 January 2021).
  9. Carotti, M.; Salaffi, F.; Sarzi-Puttini, P.; Agostini, A.; Borgheresi, A.; Minorati, D.; Galli, M.; Marotto, D.; Giovagnoni, A. Chest CT features of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia: Key points for radiologists. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 636–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shaw, B.; Daskareh, M.; Gholamrezanezhad, A. The lingering manifestations of COVID-19 during and after convalescence: Update on long-term pulmonary consequences of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Belfiore, M.P.; Urraro, F.; Grassi, R.; Giacobbe, G.; Patelli, G.; Cappabianca, S.; Reginelli, A. Artificial intelligence to codify lung CT in Covid-19 patients. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 500–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Borghesi, A.; Maroldi, R. COVID-19 outbreak in Italy: Experimental chest X-ray scoring system for quantifying and monitoring disease progression. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 509–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Di Serafino, M.; Notaro, M.; Rea, G.; Iacobellis, F.; Delli Paoli, V.; Acampora, C.; Ianniello, S.; Brunese, L.; Romano, L.; Vallone, G. The lung ultrasound: Facts or artifacts? In the era of COVID-19 outbreak. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 738–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Giovagnoni, A. Facing the COVID-19 emergency: We can and we do. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 337–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Cozzi, D.; Albanesi, M.; Cavigli, E.; Moroni, C.; Bindi, A.; Luvarà, S.; Lucarini, S.; Busoni, S.; Mazzoni, L.N.; Miele, V. Chest X-ray in new Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection: Findings and correlation with clinical outcome. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 730–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Neri, E.; Miele, V.; Coppola, F.; Grassi, R. Use of CT and artificial intelligence in suspected or COVID-19 positive patients: Statement of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 505–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Borghesi, A.; Zigliani, A.; Masciullo, R.; Golemi, S.; Maculotti, P.; Farina, D.; Maroldi, R. Radiographic severity index in COVID-19 pneumonia: Relationship to age and sex in 783 Italian patients. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 461–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gatti, M.; Calandri, M.; Barba, M.; Biondo, A.; Geninatti, C.; Gentile, S.; Greco, M.; Morrone, V.; Piatti, C.; Santonocito, A.; et al. Baseline chest X-ray in coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) patients: Association with clinical and laboratory data. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 1271–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Agostini, A.; Floridi, C.; Borgheresi, A.; Badaloni, M.; Esposto Pirani, P.; Terilli, F.; Ottaviani, L.; Giovagnoni, A. Proposal of a low-dose, long-pitch, dual-source chest CT protocol on third-generation dual-source CT using a tin filter for spectral shaping at 100 kVp for CoronaVirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients: A feasibility study. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Caruso, D.; Polici, M.; Zerunian, M.; Pucciarelli, F.; Polidori, T.; Guido, G.; Rucci, C.; Bracci, B.; Muscogiuri, E.; De Dominicis, C.; et al. Quantitative Chest CT analysis in discriminating COVID-19 from non-COVID-19 patients. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Palmisano, A.; Scotti, G.M.; Ippolito, D.; Morelli, M.J.; Vignale, D.; Gandola, D.; Sironi, S.; De Cobelli, F.; Ferrante, L.; Spessot, M.; et al. Chest CT in the emergency department for suspected COVID-19 pneumonia. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 498–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Grassi, R.; Belfiore, M.P.; Montanelli, A.; Patelli, G.; Urraro, F.; Giacobbe, G.; Fusco, R.; Granata, V.; Petrillo, A.; Sacco, P.; et al. COVID-19 pneumonia: Computer-aided quantification of healthy lung parenchyma, emphysema, ground glass and consolidation on chest computed tomography (CT). Radiol. Med. 2020, 18, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cappabianca, S.; Fusco, R.; de Lisio, A.; Paura, C.; Clemente, A.; Gagliardi, G.; Lombardi, G.; Giacobbe, G.; Russo, G.M.; Belfiore, M.P.; et al. Correction to: Clinical and laboratory data, radiological structured report findings and quantitative evaluation of lung involvement on baseline chest CT in COVID-19 patients to predict prognosis. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Giannitto, C.; Sposta, F.M.; Repici, A.; Vatteroni, G.; Casiraghi, E.; Casari, E.; Ferraroli, G.M.; Fugazza, A.; Sandri, M.T.; Chiti, A.; et al. Chest CT in patients with a moderate or high pretest probability of COVID-19 and negative swab. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 1260–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lombardi, A.F.; Afsahi, A.M.; Gupta, A.; Gholamrezanezhad, A. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), influenza, and COVID-19, beyond the lungs: A review article. Radiol. Med. 2020, 26, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ierardi, A.M.; Wood, B.J.; Arrichiello, A.; Bottino, N.; Bracchi, L.; Forzenigo, L.; Andrisani, M.C.; Vespro, V.; Bonelli, C.; Amalou, A.; et al. Preparation of a radiology department in an Italian hospital dedicated to COVID-19 patients. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 894–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fichera, G.; Stramare, R.; De Conti, G.; Motta, R.; Giraudo, C. It’s not over until it’s over: The chameleonic behavior of COVID-19 over a six-day period. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 514–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Granata, V.; Fusco, R.; Izzo, F.; Venanzio Setola, S.; Coppola, M.; Grassi, R.; Reginelli, A.; Cappabianca, S.; Grassi, R.; Petrillo, A. Covid-19 infection in cancer patients: The management in a diagnostic unit. Radiol. Oncol. 2021. [CrossRef]
  29. Reginelli, A.; Grassi, R.; Feragalli, B.; Belfiore, M.P.; Montanelli, A.; Patelli, G.; La Porta, M.; Urraro, F.; Fusco, R.; Granata, V.; et al. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Italy: Double Reading of Chest CT Examination. Biology 2021, 10, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Grassi, R.; Fusco, R.; Belfiore, M.P.; Montanelli, A.; Patelli, G.; Urraro, F.; Petrillo, A.; Granata, V.; Sacco, P.; Mazzei, M.A.; et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Italy: Features on chest computed tomography using a structured report system. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17236, Erratum in Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 4231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kransdorf, M.J.; Murphey, M.D.; Wessell, D.E.; Cassidy, R.C.; Czuczman. G.J.; Demertzis, J.L.; Lenchik, L.; Motamedi, K.; Pierce, J.L.; Sharma, A.; et.al. ACR appropriateness criteria® soft-tissue masses. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2018, 15, S189–S197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Cozzi, D.; Dini, C.; Mungai, F.; Puccini, B.; Rigacci, L.; Miele, V. Primary pulmonary lymphoma: Imaging findings in 30 cases. Radiol. Med. 2019, 124, 1262–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Net, J.M.; Mirpuri, T.M.; Plaza, M.J.; Escobar, C.A.; Whittington, E.E.; Collado-Mesa, F.; Yepes, M.M. Resident and fellow education feature: US evaluation of axillary lymph nodes. Radiographics 2014, 34, 1817–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Hypoechoic lymph node round shape without hilum (arrow) in laterocervical side; (b) axillary lymph node with concentric cortical thickening with reduction in the width of the echogenic hilum and oval shape.
Figure 1. (a) Hypoechoic lymph node round shape without hilum (arrow) in laterocervical side; (b) axillary lymph node with concentric cortical thickening with reduction in the width of the echogenic hilum and oval shape.
Biology 10 00214 g001
Figure 2. Axillary lymph node with eccentric asymmetric cortical thickening with wide echogenic hilum and oval shape.
Figure 2. Axillary lymph node with eccentric asymmetric cortical thickening with wide echogenic hilum and oval shape.
Biology 10 00214 g002
Figure 3. Lymph node (arrow) with asymmetric eccentric concentric cortical thickening in laterocervical side with reduction in the width of the echogenic hilum and oval shape.
Figure 3. Lymph node (arrow) with asymmetric eccentric concentric cortical thickening in laterocervical side with reduction in the width of the echogenic hilum and oval shape.
Biology 10 00214 g003
Figure 4. (a) Hypoechoic lymph node round shape without hilum (arrows) in laterocervical side; (b) Hypoechoic lymph node oval shape without hilum (arrow) in laterocervical side; (c) Axillary small hypoechoic lymph node oval shape without hilum (arrow).
Figure 4. (a) Hypoechoic lymph node round shape without hilum (arrows) in laterocervical side; (b) Hypoechoic lymph node oval shape without hilum (arrow) in laterocervical side; (c) Axillary small hypoechoic lymph node oval shape without hilum (arrow).
Biology 10 00214 g004
Table 1. Patients study group characteristics.
Table 1. Patients study group characteristics.
Patient
(Age; Sex)
Vaccine Administation DateTime of Appearance/Disappearance Number of NodesSide Medication Use Others Symptoms Previous Covid Infection
(Time)
Presence of Antibodies
1
(47 y; M)
01/0436 h/5 days3laterocervical sideYesNoNoNo
2
(63 y; F)
01/0824 h/3 days5laterocervical sideYesFever
(37.5 °C);
headache; fatigue; diarrhea
NoNo
3
(38 y; F)
01/0724 h/3 days3laterocervical sideNo No No No
4
(43 y; F)
01/0612 h/24 h4laterocervical sideNo No No No
5
(42 y;F)
01/1524 h/4 days3AxillaNo No No No
6
(35 y; F)
01/1512 h/24 h3laterocervical sideNoFever
(38 °C)
YesYes
7
(54 y; M)
01/0236 h/73 days1AxillaNoFever
(37.5 °C)
YesNo
8
(49 y; F)
06/0136 h/5 days3AxillaNoNoNoNo
9
(42 y; F)
01/0224 h/4 days4AxillaYes Fever
(37.5 °C)
NoNo
10
(41 y; F)
01/0536 h/5 days1laterocervical sideNoFever
(37.5 °C)
NoNo
11
(56 y; M)
01/1536 h/5 days3laterocervical sideNoFever
(38 °C)
YesYes
12
(47 y; M)
01/0424 h/ 3 days4AxillaNoNoNo No
13
(63 y; F)
01/1524 h/3 days5laterocervical sideYesFever
(37.5 °C);
headache; fatigue; diarrhea
NoNo
14
(35 y; F)
01/1324 h/3 days3AxillaNoNo No No
15
(40 y; F)
01/0524 h/3 days4AxillaNo Fatigue No No
16
(61 y; F)
01/1024 h/3 days5laterocervical sideYesHeadache; fatigue; diarrheaNoNo
17
(51 y; M)
01/0836 h/5 days3AxillaNo No No No
18
(26 y; F)
01/1024 h/ 3days)1laterocervical sideNo No No No
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Granata, V.; Fusco, R.; Setola, S.V.; Galdiero, R.; Picone, C.; Izzo, F.; D’Aniello, R.; Miele, V.; Grassi, R.; Grassi, R.; et al. Lymphadenopathy after BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine: Preliminary Ultrasound Findings. Biology 2021, 10, 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10030214

AMA Style

Granata V, Fusco R, Setola SV, Galdiero R, Picone C, Izzo F, D’Aniello R, Miele V, Grassi R, Grassi R, et al. Lymphadenopathy after BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine: Preliminary Ultrasound Findings. Biology. 2021; 10(3):214. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10030214

Chicago/Turabian Style

Granata, Vincenza, Roberta Fusco, Sergio Venanzio Setola, Roberta Galdiero, Carmine Picone, Francesco Izzo, Roberta D’Aniello, Vittorio Miele, Roberta Grassi, Roberto Grassi, and et al. 2021. "Lymphadenopathy after BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine: Preliminary Ultrasound Findings" Biology 10, no. 3: 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10030214

APA Style

Granata, V., Fusco, R., Setola, S. V., Galdiero, R., Picone, C., Izzo, F., D’Aniello, R., Miele, V., Grassi, R., Grassi, R., & Petrillo, A. (2021). Lymphadenopathy after BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine: Preliminary Ultrasound Findings. Biology, 10(3), 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10030214

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop