Next Article in Journal
Mesothelin Gene Variants Affect Soluble Mesothelin-Related Protein Levels in the Plasma of Asbestos-Exposed Males and Mesothelioma Patients from Germany
Next Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Pattern of the GRAS Gene Family in Pitaya (Selenicereus undatus L.)
Previous Article in Journal
Spectral Method in Epidemic Time Series: Application to COVID-19 Pandemic
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spatiotemporal Variation of Urban Plant Diversity and above Ground Biomass in Haikou, China

1
Hainan Yazhou Bay Seed Laboratory, Sanya Nanfan Research Institute, Hainan University, Sanya 572025, China
2
Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Tropical Bioresources, School of Life Sciences, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
3
Department of Plant Pathology, Agricultural College, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550001, China
4
Centre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF), 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
5
College of Plant Protection, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
6
State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Guizhou University, Huaxi District, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2022, 11(12), 1824; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11121824
Submission received: 9 November 2022 / Revised: 6 December 2022 / Accepted: 8 December 2022 / Published: 14 December 2022

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The relationship between urban plant diversity (UPD) and above ground biomass (AGB) were assessed across 190 urban functional units in Haikou’s tropical urban ecosystems. UPD and AGB showed time-lag effects to human activities and socioeconomics.

Abstract

Understanding the drivers of urban plant diversity (UPD) and above ground biomass (AGB) in urbanized areas is critical for urban ecosystem services and biodiversity protection. The relationships between UPD and AGB have been investigated simultaneously. However, the drivers of UPD and AGB have been explored independently in tropical coastal areas at different time points. To fill this gap, we conducted a remote sensing interpretation, field plant plot surveys, and compiled socioeconomic and urban greening management survey data. We conducted spatial analyses to investigate the relationships among UPD and socioeconomic variables across different primary and secondary urban functional units (UFUs) in the tropical urban ecosystems of the coastal city of Haikou, China. The primary UFUs with the highest AGB were the recreation and leisure districts in 2015 and 2021. In 2015, AGB was mainly correlated with the number of herb species in undeveloped land and the districts of industry, business, recreation, and leisure. In 2021, AGB was affected primarily by the frequency of fertilizing, maintenance, and watering. Our study found that the relationship between UPD and AGB varied across time and space in Haikou. The plant diversity and AGB’s response to human activities and socioeconomics appear to have a time-lag effect. These results provide new insights in understanding how management decisions affect urban vegetation and could be used to guide future urban green space planning in Haikou.

1. Introduction

Urban plant diversity (UPD) provides numerous ecosystem services that support the well-being of urban residents, such as recreation, education, biodiversity conservation, and the healthy development of urban ecosystems [1,2]. A large proportion of urban vegetation is usually purchased from nurseries and planted in urban green spaces [3,4]. Therefore, urban vegetation is usually limited by resources and social factors, such as the time and money spent on purchasing and growing plants [5,6]. Meanwhile, there is a close correlation between UPD and above ground biomass (AGB) [2,5]. AGB is associated with many ecosystem services, and as such, it has a good relationship with biodiversity in natural systems [6]. However, the relationship of AGB with plant biodiversity in urban areas remains poorly understood [7]. Since urban plant diversity and AGB distributions tend to vary with different spatiotemporal effects, no general conclusions have been drawn. A better understanding of the drivers of UPD and AGB may help to improve the management and conservation of biodiversity in urban areas worldwide.
Few previous studies have attempted to investigate the relationships among UPD, AGB, and the societal drivers across different urban functional units (UFUs, i.e., the work units in cities) in tropical urban ecosystems [8]. UFUs are the basic components of a city and strongly influenced by the city’s history and urban development patterns [4,9]. Different UFUs represent different types of land use and can be classified into commercial areas, residential areas, commercial areas, government agencies, research institutes, hospitals, industry sites, hotels, parks, urban villages, farmlands, wastelands, etc. Due to the spatial heterogeneity of urban ecosystems, the responses of UPD to influencing factors have different spatial patterns and time-lag effects that can also alter their composition [10,11]. Jong et al. (2013) analyzed the lag effect of vegetation in the past 30 years and found that climate could explain about 54% of vegetation variations [12]. The analysis of the lag effect of vegetation in Spanish coastal urban areas over the past 50 years found that urbanization was associated with a substantial increase in vegetation coverage [13]. In urban natural forests, UPD typically increases rapidly in early stages and declines in later stages [14]. In managed urban forests, UPDs are primarily affected by human disturbance and management practices. These factors play important roles in regulating ecosystem services and creating heterogeneous forest structures [15]. Although UPD in forest ecosystems has been extensively explored, evidence for this functional link is still lacking in urban green spaces under different management practices [16].
To better understand the driving mechanisms and spatiotemporal variations of UPD and AGB in coastal urbanized areas, we utilized the tropical coastal city of Haikou (China) as a study area and adopted the stratified random sampling method to set up 190 survey plots in different UFUs. Our study simultaneously considers muti-factors on UPD and plant distribution. We combined remote sensing interpretation with field surveys to obtain the 2015 and 2021 UPD data in Haikou. Using socioeconomic data of different time periods, the spatial distribution pattern of plant diversity in different types of UFUs was analyzed. The correlations between plant diversity (number of tree, shrub, and herb species) and land use, socioeconomics, and management measure were elucidated. This study aims to elucidate (1) the distribution patterns of UPD in Haikou in 2015 and 2021; (2) analyze the variations and driving factors of UPD and AGB in Haikou between 2015 and 2021; and (3) analyze whether time-lag effects could explain UPD and AGB in Haikou.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Haikou (E110°10′~1110°41′, N19°32′~20°05′) is the capital, and most populous city of China’s Hainan Province [17]. The total area of the study area is about 3145.93 km2. The city population in 2020 was 2,360,100 (Figure 1) [18]. We chose a built-up area of Haikou to make our study area representative of the typical urban landscape. The built-up area of Haikou is bordered by Qiongzhou Strait on the north, the Haikou Ring Expressway on the south, the Haikou Nandu River of Haikou on the east, and Huoshankou Road on the west.

2.2. Selection of Urban Functional Units (UFUs) and Field Surveys

A total of 190 urban functional units (UFUs) were selected according to the study delineated by Zhang et al. (2022) [7]. The UFUs were divided into six primary types (public affairs service districts, industry districts, business districts, residential districts, recreation and leisure districts, transportation, and undeveloped land) and 16 secondary types (Table 1). The wetlands included marine areas and river channels that did not grow plants.
We used the stratified sampling to delineate plots in Haikou. We drew 154 grids of 650 × 650 m in the built-up area of Haikou. Within each grid, we selected 1–3 UFUs based on their representability and cultural importance [6,8]. A total of 190 UFUs were generated. Three plots of 20 × 20 m with high plant diversity in each UFU were selected to maximize the plant diversity of the entire UFU. Then, five 5 × 5 m shrub plots and five 1 × 1 m herb plots were established in the central four corners of each 20 × 20 m plot [2,19,20,21]. In all plots, we described and recorded the characteristics of all plants (species name, plant height and DBH for each tree; species name, plant height, clump number, and coverage for shrub species; species name, plant height, and coverage for herb species). We also used GPS to determine its longitude and latitude.
We conducted surveys in the same UFUs in May-June and November-December of 2015 and 2021, to ensure that the survey covered most of the flowering and fruiting periods. In a preliminary field survey in June and December, we found about 70% of the plants were flowering or bearing fruit. We used the “flora of China” to identify plant species and standardized plant names according to The Plant List (http://www.theplantlist.org/ (accessed on 15 June 2021)) [22]. If plant species could not be identified in the field, we collected samples to compare them with those in the China Flora Herbarium (https://www.cfh.ac.cn/ (accessed on 13 June 2021)) or consulted experts for identification. We distinguished between natural and cultivated plant species based on the definitions of Cheng et al. (2021) [23]. Natural species were those that grow without human disturbance, while cultivated plants were those that require human maintenance to grow and maintain viable populations.

2.3. AGB and UPD Calculations

We calculated AGB for each plant species with a diameter at breast height (DBH) ≥ 2 cm in each sampled plot using a formula proposed by Nizamani (2021):
AGB = 0.4 π ( dbh 2 ) 2 × height + 300 × plant   density
The DBH data were obtained from field surveys, and the wood density was obtained from the trait vegetation database TRY (https://www.try-db.org/TryWeb/Home.php (accessed on 10 July 2021)). We used species richness as a measure of urban plant diversity (UPD), and calculated UPD separately for tree, shrub, and herb species in each UFU in 2015 and 2021.

2.4. Urban Management Variables

Management factors in our research included fertilization frequency (times/year), maintenance frequency (times/year), and watering frequency (times/year). We compiled a questionnaire and interviewed at least one leader or employee responsible for green maintenance at each UFU. If the managers were not present during the survey, we called the property management office to conduct a telephone survey to obtain the management data for the management factors.

2.5. Socioeconomic Variables

For housing prices, we obtained 2015 and 2021 data from Anjuke (https://haikou.anjuke.com (accessed on 1 July 2021)), a major online real estate software in China. The query time was July 2015 and July 2021. If the UFU was not residential, we used the average house price in the nearest residential area. For the construction age of the UFU, we inquired the property through the survey, or consulted the Baidu (https://www.baidu.com/ (accessed on 18 July 2021)) website to get the construction age of the building.
To determine the total population (P) of each UFU, we use the following formula: P = A × B × C × D; where A is the number of residential buildings in a UFU based on aerial photography and field investigation statistics, B is the number of floors in each building, C is the number of residential units (households) per floor, and D is the average number of people in each household (2.62 persons/family) according to 2015 and 2020 China National Census Data [24]. Finally, we calculated the population density (people/km2) as P/E, where E is the area covered by each UFU. We obtained the longitude and latitude of each UFU by GPS positioning.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

To compare UPD of different types of primary and secondary UFUs, we drew boxplots with AGB and the number of trees, shrubs, herbs, and total UPD in each UFU with the R package “ggplot2” [25]. We calculated z-scores for all variables using IBM SPSS Statistics 23.0 and removed outliers (z-score greater and lower than 3 and −3, respectively) [26]. The mean and standard deviation of AGB and the number of trees, shrubs, herbs and total UPD in each UFU were calculated using IBM SPSS Statistics 23 Chicago, USA. Then, we used AGB and UPD of trees, shrubs, and herbs species as dependent variable, and socioeconomic (construction age, housing price, population density), geographical factors (longitude, latitude,) and management factors (maintenance frequency, watering frequency, fertilization frequency) as independent variables. We used stepwise regression analysis and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) to output the best model information. We first built two models using data from 2015 and 2021. Then, we built a third model to determine if UPD and AGB responses to socioeconomic and management factors had a time lag effect by comparing whether past socioeconomic factors better explain UPD than present socioeconomic factors. We built this model using UPD and AGB data from 2021 and socioeconomic and management factors from 2015.

3. Results

3.1. Urban Functional Unit Species Composition

According to our field surveys, we found 667 plant species belonging to 99 families in 2015 and 898 plant species belonging to 151 families in 2021. The families that contained the most plant species were Poaceae (N = 26), Asteraceae (N = 27), and Fabaceae (N = 32) in 2015, and Poaceae (N = 82), Fabaceae (N = 65), Asteraceae (N = 48) in 2021 (Table S2).

3.2. Variations in AGB and UPD between 2015 and 2021 across Primary and Secondary UFUs

From 2015 to 2021 (Table 2 and Table S1), the highest AGB increase was in public affairs service districts (2.78 × 107 ± 3.27 × 107) and the highest AGB decrease was in recreation and leisure districts (−5.31 × 107 ± −3.19 × 107). The top three primary UFUs with the greatest AGB were recreation and leisure districts (1.01 × 108 ± 7.80 × 107), industry and business districts (2.83 × 107 ± 2.68 × 107), and transportation (2.12 × 107 ± 1.60 × 107) in 2015 (Table 2; Figure 2), and recreation and leisure districts (4.8 × 107 ± 4.88 × 107), public affairs service districts (4.79 × 107 ± 4.6 × 107), and transportation (4.43 × 107 ± 6.05 × 107) in 2021.
From 2015 to 2021, the number of trees increased the most in transportation (2.80 ± 1.02), and the least in residential districts (0.90 ± 0.45). In 2015, the top three primary UFUs with the greatest number of trees were residential districts (4.38 ± 2.62), public affairs service districts (3.91 ± 1.95), and recreation and leisure districts (3.61 ± 1.52) (Table S1; Figure 2). In 2021, these UFUs were transportation (6.13 ± 2.80), public affairs service districts (5.90 ± 2.84), and industry and business districts (5.65 ± 2.46).
From 2015 to 2021, the number of shrubs increased the most in undeveloped land (5.50 ± 0.70) and the least in recreation and leisure districts (2.78 ± 1.65). In 2015, the top three primary UFUs with the greatest number of shrubs were recreation and leisure districts (2.12 ± 1.46), residential districts (1.48 ± 0.55), and public affairs service districts (1.43 ± 0.58). In 2021, they were transportation (6.08 ± 2.90), industry and business districts (5.73 ± 2.03), and public affairs service districts (5.64 ± 2.36).
From 2015 to 2021, the number of herbs increased the most in transportation (6.90 ± 3.93) and decreased the most in recreation and leisure districts (−1.00 ± 1.50). In 2015, the top three primary UFUs with greatest number of herbs were recreation and leisure districts (4.48 ± 2.96), public affairs service districts (2.48 ± 1.79), and residential districts (2.02 ± 1.16). In 2021, they changed to transportation (8.04 ± 4.80), public affairs service districts (7.92 ± 4.98), and industry and business districts (7.35 ± 3.87).
From 2015 to 2021, the number of total species increased the most in transportation (22.5 ± 4.5). In 2015, the top three primary UFUs with greatest number of total species were recreation and leisure districts (10.21 ± 4.02), while in 2021 were transportation (22.5 ± 4.5).
Variations in AGB and UPD of the secondary UFUs between 2015 and 2021 are shown in Appendix A, Table S2, and Figure S1.

3.3. Models Predicting AGB in 2015 and 2021

AGB in 2015 was positively related to latitude (β coefficient = 0.008 **) (Table 3). AGB in 2021 had no significant relationship with construction age, population density, traffic flow, distance from main road, longitude, latitude, fertilizing frequency, maintenance frequency, or watering frequency. We found that species numbers in 2021 were affected by house prices in 2015 (Figure 3).

3.4. Models Predicting the Number of total Trees, Shrubs, and Herbs from Different Variables in 2015 and 2021

The number of tree species in 2021 was positively related to fertilization frequency (β coefficient = 0.276 *) (Table 4). The number of shrub species in 2015 had positive relationships with traffic flow (β coefficient = 0.133 *) and watering frequency ( β coefficient = 0.524 *). The number of shrub species in 2021 had a strong positive relationship with construction age (β coefficient = 0.360 ***) and distance from the main road (β coefficient = 0.090 *). The number of herb species in 2021 negatively correlated with fertilization frequency (β coefficient = −0.256 *). The total number of all species in 2015 had a positive relationship with watering frequency (β coefficient = 0.417 ***). The total number of all species in 2021 was positively related with maintenance frequency (β coefficient = 1.494 **).

4. Discussion

4.1. Variations of Species Composition

Most of the plant species found in Haikou’s UFUs were herbs. Despite of the differences in survey plot selection, our conclusions are similar to Guo et al. (2022): herbs are causal species that establish easily in new plots after dispersal by different vectors [27]. We found a large increase in the number of species in industry areas and sand land. Some plant species should be selected and planted in industrial areas due to their ability to tolerate pollutants and are used as pollution indicators, enrichment of pollutants (such as heavy metals) [28], dust prevention [29], and noise reduction [30]. Air pollution is a major problem arising mainly from industrialization. Plants remove a significant amount of pollution from the atmosphere as part of their normal functioning, thus directly increase the air quality in the city and its surrounding area. We should consider an integral part of any comprehensive plan aimed at improving overall air quality [31]. Urban sprawl has led to the exploitation of sand and wasteland, but this is not necessarily had a negative impact, because as shown by Zhang et al. (2022), the suburban areas of Haikou have become greener with urban expansion [7].

4.2. Variations in UPD and AGB in Primary and Secondary UFUs in 2015 and 2021

Different land use types affect the planting of trees, shrubs, and herbs in urban functional units, thus affecting AGB. Areas with more herbaceous species tend to have more biodiversity and higher biomass [32] (Zhou et al., 2017). Land use has widely been used to explain the distribution of urban plants. In 2015, our AGB was significantly positively correlated with most land use types in Haikou. These findings support the land use hypothesis, as different land types correspond to different government plans and impact on vegetation planting [9,33]. We found that the primary UFUs with the highest AGB in both 2015 and 2021 were recreation and leisure districts. The secondary UFUs with the highest AGB in 2015 and 2021 were parks. Like the findings of Goertzen et al. (2021) and Zhang et al. (2022), we found that recreation and leisure districts that usually include parks and other areas with large urban green spaces also had a high AGB [7,34]. The data on the change in AGB showed that AGB grew or remained largely unchanged between 2015 and 2021 because trees grow lusher with age, and UFU had hardly been torn down and rebuilt during the study.
The number of tree, shrub, and herb species was rising in each type of primary UFUs. The largest increase in the number of tree species was in the industry and business districts and transportation. The largest increase in the number of shrub species was in the undeveloped area, and the largest increase in the number of herb species was in transportation (Table 2). There were differences in the UPD within different UFUs, and we believe these differences are caused by people’s growing awareness that plants will improve urban environment, and because of people preferences for their own plant cultivation.
The species diversity of the park was relatively high in secondary UFUs. In contrast, the species diversity in government agencies and industrial areas had grown dramatically, and urban expansion led to increased plant diversity in sandy land between 2015 and 2021. Parks were large green patches in the city, which must be given the function of viewing, recreation, and protecting the ecological environment at the beginning of planning. Patch size is an important factor affecting UPD [35,36]. Previous studies showed that large forest patches were found to host many plant species that were not found in small patches, including many old-growth forest and rare species [37,38,39], and that remnant native vegetation was essential for the survival of native species [40,41]. We found that some parks in Haikou, such as Baishamen Park and West Coast Ribbon Park, were established on a desert beach where the vegetation was all secondary. However, they were also essential for the survival of native species.
The districts with the highest number of tree species in 2015 were residential districts in 2015 and public affairs service districts in 2021 [5]. Residential districts have large populations and tend to purchase large numbers of tree species for planting due to people’s preferences and the importance of urban biodiversity as the government has realized [35]. The Haikou government invested a lot of money in increasing urban green plants after 2014. More leisure space for urban residents was provided, thus making the 2021 public affairs service districts regional and increasing labor [15]. Previous research found that parks, universities, and government agencies usually own a large amount of land for grassland construction, such as government agencies and schools, gardens, and sports grounds. In 2021, the greatest number of herb species in Haikou City were government agencies. Using remote sensing images, we observed that during the period from 2015 to 2021, a large part of the area of government agencies was available for planting trees and building lawns to increase green areas.

4.3. Comparisons of the Drivers of AGB and UPD in Haikou in 2015 and 2021

In 2015 and 2021, the number of trees, shrub, and herb species were positively correlated with fertilizing frequency, maintenance frequency, and watering frequency. These results indicate that the increase in management was related to the species diversity within UFUs. Our research found that the AGB of different UFUs in Haikou in 2021 was significantly higher than in 2015. This may be because of the government policies for the urban green space in Haikou to gradually increase the green space in the city from 2004 to 2020 [42]. Therefore, these areas are likely to be used to enforce these policies. In 2015, the land use type was the most significant predictor of AGB, while AGB in 2021 was mainly affected by urban management methods. This conclusion further verifies that Haikou Municipal Government’s plan to increase urban green space was gradually realized. Our study found that plant diversity and AGB’s response to human activities and socioeconomics appear to have a time-lag effect. The time-lag effect of vegetation on climate change is an important aspect for explaining plant diversity [10,43].
Our model shows that socioeconomic factors in 2015 could partially explain AGB and shrub and herb species richness in 2021. In particular, the house prices in 2015 could explain AGB in 2021 better than the house prices in 2021, and the construction age in 2015 could explain shrub and herb species richness better than the construction age in 2021. The following reasons can explain this result. The luxury effect predicts a positive relationship between affluence and urban plant diversity. UFUs are ideal models for analyzing the components of urban vegetation based on the assumption that greater wealth allows greater investment in diversity [4,7,44]. Through field investigations, we found that the green space in the same UFU had rarely been torn down and rebuilt in these six years, and the plants had grown during these six years. This phenomenon appears widespread but lacks data support, so this view should be analyzed in future studies. At the same time, it enlightens us that the planning of green spaces should be far-sighted, and when investing in green spaces, we should estimate the landscape and ecological effects in the coming years.
Maintenance and watering frequency influenced urban plant diversity. The maintainers of UFUs will try to mitigate climate extremes by adjusting watering behavior to support plant survival especially in hot and dry weather [45]. Monitoring of watering frequency in community gardens in California, USA, found that when temperatures were higher, watering time was longer, and water consumption was higher [46]. This could demonstrate that water use behavior may be able to increase as well as maintain plant diversity. These results are consistent with our findings that in 2015 the total number of species was mainly affected by watering frequency. In 2021, the total number of species was mainly affected by maintenance frequency.

5. Conclusions

This study investigated the spatial and temporal variation of plant diversity and above ground biomass in Haikou across 190 UFUs over six years, which may only be the tip of the iceberg of our efforts to reveal the relationships among intricate factors in urban ecosystems. Through investigating Haikou’s urban spatial pattern and plant diversity, the choice of space and vegetation among UFUs should be differentiated by socioeconomic factors. Unlike previous random sampling, based on the combination of survey and re-mote sensing data, we found that within the urban functional unit of Haikou City from 2015 to 2021, land use and conservation management are the main drivers of AGB. Our findings suggest that recreation and leisure are essential for green space conservation in Haikou city. In particular, the government’s investment and effective application of the government’s financial investment in the greening of traffic areas has the most obvious effect, leading to the growth of a large amount of vegetation in a short period. In conclusion, our findings suggest that more governmental, commercial, and individual efforts are required to promote AGB in Haikou, and we advocate further research to understand the distribution of AGB at the UFU level. Moreover, we are conducting long-term monitoring of Haikou City as a case of the tropical coastal urban ecosystem. More scientific hypotheses (such as the time lag effect hypothesis) would be tested on larger spatial and temporal scales in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology11121824/s1, Figure S1: Boxplots of AGB and the number of total, tree, shrub and herb plant species in secondary UFUs in 2015 and 2021; Table S1: Mean value and standard deviation of AGB and the number of total, tree, shrub and herb species in primary UFUs in Haikou in 2015 and 2021; Table S2: Mean value and standard deviation of the AGB and the number of trees, shrubs and herbs in secondary UFUs in Haikou.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.-F.W.; methodology, J.-J.Z., L.-Y.G., and H.-L.Z.; software, H.-L.Z.; validation, H.-F.W.; formal analysis, H.-L.Z., L.-Y.G., J.-J.Z., and M.M.N.; investigation, H.-L.Z.; resources, H.-L.Z. and H.-F.W.; data curation, H.-F.W.; writing—original draft preparation, H.-L.Z., L.-Y.G., J.-J.Z., and M.M.N.; writing—review and editing, J.-J.Z., H.-F.W., L.-Y.G., J.P.C., H.-L.Z., and M.M.N.; visualization, H.-F.W.; supervision, H.-F.W.; project administration, H.-F.W.; funding acquisition, H.-F.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32160273), the Project of Sanya Yazhou Bay Science and Technology City Grant No: SCKJ-JYRC-2022-83), the Shanghai Key lab for urban Ecological processes and Eco-Restoration (SHUES2022A06), and the Program of Introducing Talents to Chinese Universities (111 Program no. D20023).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study can be obtained by contacting the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A. Variations in the Number of Plant Species in Secondary Urban Functional Units (UFUs) between 2015 to 2021

The top three secondary UFUs with the greatest AGB were parks (2.87 × 107 ± 2.17 × 107), museums (7.51 × 106 ± 5.99 × 106), and supermarkets (4.28 × 106 ± 6.53 × 105) in 2015 (Table S2; Figure 3). The top three secondary UFUs with the greatest AGB were parks (7.01 × 106 ± 5.28 × 106), bus parking (6.97 × 106 ± 7.07 × 106), and research institutes (6.80 × 106 ± 0) in 2021 (Figure S2).
In 2015, the top three secondary UFUs with the greatest number of trees were bus parking (8.00 ± 5.29), hospitals (4.78 ± 2.39), and colleges or universities (4.60 ± 1.52). In 2021, the top three secondary UFUs with the greatest number of trees were primary and middle schools (7.44 ± 2.65), main roads and secondary roads (6.40 ± 2.64), and industrial offices (6.38 ± 1.92).
In 2015, the top three secondary UFUs with the greatest number of shrubs were supermarkets (2.25 ± 1.06), museums (2.15 ± 2.5), and parks (2.11 ± 0.43). In 2021, the top three secondary UFUs with the greatest number of shrubs were industry (6.43 ± 1.13), main roads and secondary roads (6.25 ± 2.90), and primary and middle schools (6.30 ± 2.71).
In 2015, the top three secondary UFUs with the greatest number of herbs were parks (5.00 ± 1.60), museums (3.70 ± 4.01), and hospitals (2.04 ± 0.70). In 2020, the top three secondary UFUs with the greatest number of herbs were wetlands (12.00 ± 4.24), governmental agencies (10.25 ± 4.90), and parks (9.67 ± 5.16).

References

  1. Belaire, J.A.; Westphal, L.M.; Whelan, C.J.; Minor, E.S. Urban residents’ perceptions of birds in the neighborhood: Biodiversity, cultural ecosystem services, and disservices. Condor Ornithol. Appl. 2015, 117, 192–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Nizamani, M.M.; Harris, A.; Cheng, X.; Zhu, Z.; Jim, C.Y.; Wang, H. Positive relationships among aboveground biomass, tree species diversity, and urban greening management in tropical coastal city of Haikou. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 11, 12204–12219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Avolio, M.L.; Pataki, D.E.; Trammell, T.L.E.; Endter-Wada, J. Biodiverse cities: The nursery industry, homeowners, and neighborhood differences drive urban tree composition. Ecol. Monogr. 2018, 88, 259–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Hope, D.; Gries, C.; Zhu, W.; Fagan, W.F.; Redman, C.L.; Grimm, N.B.; Kinzig, A. Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 8788–8792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Borges, E.R.; Dexter, K.G.; Pyles, M.V.; Bueno, M.L.; Dos Santos, R.M.; Fontes, M.A.L.; Carvalho, F.A. The interaction of land-use history and tree species diversity in driving variation in the aboveground biomass of urban versus non-urban tropical forests. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 129, 107915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Estrada, G.C.D.; Soares, M.L.G.; Fernadez, V.; De Almeida, P.M.M. The economic evaluation of carbon storage and sequestration as ecosystem services of mangroves: A case study from southeastern Brazil. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 2015, 11, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Zhang, H.L.; Cubino, J.P.; Nizamani, M.M.; Harris, A.J.; Cheng, X.L.; Da, L.; Sun, Z.; Wang, H.F. Wealth and land use drive the distribution of urban green space in the tropical coastal city of Haikou, China. Urban For. Urban Green. 2022, 71, 127554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Urban Forest Effects (UFORE) Model: Field Data Collection Manual. 2011. Available online: http://www.ufore.org/using/03-00.html (accessed on 8 June 2021).
  9. Clarke, L.W.; Jenerette, G.D.; Davila, A. The luxury of vegetation and the legacy of tree biodiversity in Los Angeles, CA. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 116, 48–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, D.; Zhao, X.; Liang, S.; Zhou, T.; Huang, K.; Tang, B.; Zhao, W. Time-lag effects of global vegetation responses to climate change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2015, 21, 3520–3531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hedlund, K.; Santa Regina, I.; Van der Putten, W.H.; Leps, J.; Diaz, T.; Korthals, G.W.; Van Dijk, C. plant biomass and responses of the soil community on abandoned land across Europe: Idiosyncracy or above-belowground time lags. Oikos. Plant Species Divers. 2003, 103, 45–58. [Google Scholar]
  12. De Jong, R.; Schaepman, M.E.; Furrer, R.; de Bruin, S.; Verburg, P.H. Spatial relationship between climatologies and changes in global vegetation activity. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2013, 19, 1953–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. González-Moreno, P.; Pino, J.; Cózar, A.; García-de-Lomas, J.; Vilà, M. The effects of landscape history and time-lags on plant invasion in Mediterranean coastal habitats. Biol. Invasions 2016, 19, 549–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang., Y.; Wang, T.X.; Fu, S.Y. Discussion on the present situation and management countermeasures of land reclamation in Hainan Province. Ocean Dev. Manag. 2015, 32, 56–59. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wolf, K.L.; Lam, S.T.; McKeen, J.K.; Richardson, G.R.; Van den Bosch, M.; Bardekjian, A.C. Urban trees and human health: A scoping review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 17, 4371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Feltynowski, M.; Kronenberg, J.; Bergier, T.; Kabisch, N.; Łaszkiewicz, E.; Strohbach, M.W. Challenges of urban green space management in the face of using inadequate data. Urban For. Urban Green. 2018, 31, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, C.; Sun, Z.; Xing, Q.; Sun, J.; Xia, T.; Yu, H. Localizing Indicators of SDG11 for an Integrated Assessment of Urban Sustainability—A Case Study of Hainan Province. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, L.; Zhang, H.L.; Nizamani, M.M.; Zhou, Q.; Su, X.; Chen, Y. Analyses of community stability and inter-specific associations between a plant species with extremely small populations (Hopea hainanensis) and its associated species. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hughes, F.; Vitousek, P.M. Barriers to shrub reestablishment following fire in the seasonal submontane zone of Hawai’i. Oecologia 1993, 93, 557–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Siemann, E. Experimental tests of effects of plant productivity and diversity on grassland arthropod diversity. Ecology 1998, 79, 2057–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Martin, C.A.; Peterson, K.A.; Stabler, L.B. Residential landscaping in Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.: Practices and preferences relative to covenants, codes, and restrictions. J. Arboric. 2003, 29, 9–17. [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, C.; Qiao, X.; Guo, K.; Zhao, L.; Pan, Q. Vegetation classification of Stipa steppes in China, with reference to the International Vegetation Classification. Veg. Classif. Surv. 2022, 3, 121–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cheng, X.L.; Yuan, L.X.; Nizamani, M.M.; Zhu, Z.X.; Friedman, C.R.; Wang, H.F. Taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity of vascular plants at Ma’anling volcano urban park in tropical Haikou, China: Reponses to soil properties. PLoS ONE 2022, 13, e0198517. [Google Scholar]
  24. NBOS (National Bureau of Statistics), Main Data of the Seventh National Population Census. 2020. Available online: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/202105/t20210510_1817176.html (accessed on 11 June 2021).
  25. Maag, J.L. gganatogram: An R package for modular visualisation of anatograms and tissues based on ggplot2. F1000Research 2018, 7, 1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Colan, S.D. The why and how of Z scores. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2013, 26, 38–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bayouli, I.T.; Bayouli, H.T.; Dell’Oca, A.; Meers, E.; Sun, J. Ecological indicators and bioindicator plant species for biomonitoring industrial pollution: Eco-based environmental assessment. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 125, 107508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ahmad, I.; Gul, I.; Irum, S.; Manzoor, M.; Arshad, M. Accumulation of heavy metals in wild plants collected from the industrial sites-potential for phytoremediation. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Atasoy, M. Monitoring the urban green spaces and landscape fragmentation using remote sensing: A case study in Osmaniye, Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2018, 190, 713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, L.; Guan, D.S.; Peart, M.R. The morphological structure of leaves and the dust-retaining capability of afforested plants in urban Guangzhou, South China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2012, 19, 3440–3449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pathak, V.; Tripathi, B.D.; Mishra, V.K. Dynamics of traffic noise in a tropical city Varanasi and its abatement through vegetation. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2008, 146, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lowry, J.H.; Baker, M.E.; Ramsey, R.D. Determinants of urban tree canopy in residential neighborhoods: Household characteristics, urban form, and the geophysical landscape. Urban Ecosyst. 2021, 15, 247–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mennis, J. Socioeconomic-vegetation relationships in urban, residential land. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2006, 72, 911–921. [Google Scholar]
  34. Arnberger, A.; Allex, B.; Eder, R.; Ebenberger, M.; Wanka, A.; Kolland, F.; Hutter, H.P. Elderly resident’s uses of and preferences for urban green spaces during heat periods. Urban For. Urban Green. 2017, 21, 102–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cheng, X.L.; Cubino, J.P.; Balfour, K.; Zhu, Z.X.; Wang, H.F. Drivers of spontaneous and cultivated species diversity in the tropical city of Zhanjiang, China. Urban For. Urban Green. 2022, 67, 127428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Guirado, M.; Pino, J.; Rodà, F. Understorey plant species richness and composition in metropolitan forest archipelagos: Effects of forest size, adjacent land use and distance to the edge. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2006, 15, 50–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Anderson, P.; Charles-Dominique, T.; Ernstson, H. Post apartheid ecologies in the City of Cape Town: An examination of plant functional traits in relation to urban gradients. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2020, 193, 103662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Abida, B.; Harikrishna, S. Evaluation of Some Tree Species to Absorb Air Pollutants in Three Industrial Locations of South Bengaluru, India. E-J. Chem. 2010, 7, S151–S156. [Google Scholar]
  39. Summerville, K.S.; Crist, T.O. Determinants of lepidopteran community composition and species diversity in eastern deciduous forests: Roles of season, eco-region and patch size. Oikos 2003, 100, 134–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chang, C.R.; Chen, M.C.; Su, M.H. Natural versus human drivers of plant diversity in urban parks and the anthropogenic species-area hypotheses. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2022, 208, 104023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hahs, A.K.; McDonnell, M.J.; McCarthy, M.A.; Vesk, P.A.; Corlett, R.T.; Norton, B.A. A global synthesis of plant extinction rates in urban areas. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12, 1165–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gomez-Baggethun, E.; Barton, D.N. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 86, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gao, N.N.; Li, F.; Zeng, H.; Zheng, Y.R. The impact of human activities, natural factors and climate time-lag effects over 33 years in Heihe River Basin, China. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2021, 19, 1589–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lubbe, C.S.; Siebert, S.J.; Cilliers, S.S. Political legacy of south africa affects the plant diversity patterns of urban domestic gardens along a socio-economic gradient. Sci. Res. Essays 2010, 5, 2900–2910. [Google Scholar]
  45. Egerer, M.H.; Lin, B.B.; Threlfall, C.G.; Kendal, D. Temperature variability influences urban garden plant richness and gardener water use behavior, but not planting decisions. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 646, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lin, B.B.; Egerer, M.H.; Liere, H.; Jha, S.; Bichier, P.; Philpott, S.M. Local- and landscape-scale land cover affects microclimate and water use in urban gardens. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 610–611, 570–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The location of Haikou; (a) Map of China highlighting Hainan, (b) map of Hainan highlighting Haikou, and (c) satellite imagery of Haikou.
Figure 1. The location of Haikou; (a) Map of China highlighting Hainan, (b) map of Hainan highlighting Haikou, and (c) satellite imagery of Haikou.
Biology 11 01824 g001
Figure 2. Boxplots of AGB and the number of total, tree, shrub and herb plant species in primary UFUs in 2015 and 2021. The black dots in the graph represent extreme outliers.
Figure 2. Boxplots of AGB and the number of total, tree, shrub and herb plant species in primary UFUs in 2015 and 2021. The black dots in the graph represent extreme outliers.
Biology 11 01824 g002
Figure 3. Scatterplot depicting the relationships between AGB and housing price in Haikou in 2015, 2021, and 2015 with 2021. 2015 + 2021 represents univariate analysis of the number of species in 2021 and socioeconomic factors in 2015.
Figure 3. Scatterplot depicting the relationships between AGB and housing price in Haikou in 2015, 2021, and 2015 with 2021. 2015 + 2021 represents univariate analysis of the number of species in 2021 and socioeconomic factors in 2015.
Biology 11 01824 g003
Table 1. Number of primary and secondary urban function units (UFUs) selected in Haikou.
Table 1. Number of primary and secondary urban function units (UFUs) selected in Haikou.
Primary Type of UFUsSecondary Types of UFUsNumber of UFUs
Public affairs service districtsGovernmental Agencies18
Colleges/Universities7
Primary/Middle Schools18
Research Institutes4
Hospitals12
Industry and business districtsIndustry12
Hotels11
Industrial Offices9
Supermarkets3
Residential districtsLow-Density Residential Areas5
(<6 stories)
High-Density Residential Areas43
(>6 stories)
Recreation and leisure districtsParks7
Museums5
TransportationMain/Secondary Roads28
Bus Parking5
Undeveloped landWetland3
Total 190
Table 2. Mean and standard deviation changes of AGB and the number of total, tree, shrub and herb species in primary UFU in Haikou from 2015 to 2021.
Table 2. Mean and standard deviation changes of AGB and the number of total, tree, shrub and herb species in primary UFU in Haikou from 2015 to 2021.
Primary UFU TypeAGBNumber of Tree SpeciesNumber of Shrub SpeciesNumber of Herb SpeciesNumber of Total Species
Public affairs service districts2.78 × 107 ± 3.27 × 1061.99 ± 0.894.21 ± 1.765.44 ± 3.1911.93 ± 3.03
Industry and business districts1.28 × 107 ± 8.25 × 1062.06 ± 0.734.44 ± 1.465.77 ± 3.0412.21 ± 3.7
Residential districts1.00 × 107 ± 6.50 × 1060.90 ± 0.454.13 ± 2.284.48 ± 2.919.51 ± 4.29
Recreation and leisure districts−5.31 × 107 ± −3.19 × 1071.89 ± 0.992.78 ± 1.65−1.00 ± 1.509.09 ± 2.53
Transportation2.31 × 107 ± 4.44 × 107 2.80 ± 1.024.96 ± 2.276.90 ± 3.9314.67 ± 4.98
Undeveloped land1.88 × 107 ± 1.44 × 107 1.72 ± 1.415.50 ± 0.703.44 ± 1.4622.5 ± 4.5
Table 3. Stepwise regression models with factors predicting the change of above ground biomass (AGB) from 2015 to 2021.
Table 3. Stepwise regression models with factors predicting the change of above ground biomass (AGB) from 2015 to 2021.
2015 AGB2021 AGB
Socioeconomic variablesConstruction age (years)--
Housing price (RMB/yuan)--
Population density (inhabitants/km2)--
Traffic flow0.068-
Distance from main road (m)--
Geographical factorsLongitude--
Latitude0.008 **-
Greening management factorsFertilizing frequency (times/year)0.061−0.089
Maintenance frequency (times/year)--
Watering frequency (times/year)--
Intercept0.007 **0.070
Akaike information criterion (AIC)−314.59−848.48
p-value0.0697.516 × 10−5
Adjusted R-squared0.0030.087
‘-’ indicates that the variable was not included in the final model. Significance codes: ‘**’ p < 0.01. 2015 + 2021 represents univariate analysis of the AGB in 2021 and predictors from 2015.
Table 4. Stepwise regression model with factors predicting the number of total, tree, shrub, and herbs species in 2015 and 2021.
Table 4. Stepwise regression model with factors predicting the number of total, tree, shrub, and herbs species in 2015 and 2021.
Predictor 2015 Tree 2021 Tree 2015 Shrubs 2021 Shrubs 2015 Herbs 2021 Herbs 2015 Total 2021 Total
EstimateEstimateEstimateEstimateEstimateEstimateEstimateEstimate
Socioeconomic variablesConstruction age (years)-0.214−0.482−0.360 ***---−0.645 *
Housing price (RMB/yuan)< 0.001.-<−0.0010.059----
Population density (inhabitants/km2)<−0.0010.153< 0.001-----
Traffic flow−0.085 *-0.133 *-0.091---
Distance from main road (m)---0.090 *-−0.065--
Geographical factorsLongitude--------
Latitude-0.874---−0.870--
Greening management factorsFertilizing frequency (times/year)0.1020.276 *--−0.190−0.256 *0.505-
Maintenance frequency (times/year)--−0.126----0.417 ***
Watering frequency (times/year)--0.524 *---1.494 **-
Intercept0.741−0.057 −0.001 −0.014−0.0440.0800.253 **−163 *
Akaike information criterion (AIC)−292.96−241.22−131.71−292−122.42−312.29−31.14−111.38
p-value<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001 <0.001<0.001
Adjusted R-squared0.7650.7650.2690.8230.3130.8370.1370.234
‘-’ indicates that the variable was not included in the final model. Significance codes: ‘***’ p < 0.001 ‘**’ p < 0.01 ‘*’ p < 0.05. 2015 + 2021 represents univariate analysis of the number of species in 2021 and socioeconomic factors in 2015.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, H.-L.; Nizamani, M.M.; Cubino, J.P.; Guo, L.-Y.; Zhou, J.-J.; Wang, H.-F. Spatiotemporal Variation of Urban Plant Diversity and above Ground Biomass in Haikou, China. Biology 2022, 11, 1824. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11121824

AMA Style

Zhang H-L, Nizamani MM, Cubino JP, Guo L-Y, Zhou J-J, Wang H-F. Spatiotemporal Variation of Urban Plant Diversity and above Ground Biomass in Haikou, China. Biology. 2022; 11(12):1824. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11121824

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Hai-Li, Mir Muhammad Nizamani, Josep Padullés Cubino, Lin-Yuan Guo, Jing-Jiang Zhou, and Hua-Feng Wang. 2022. "Spatiotemporal Variation of Urban Plant Diversity and above Ground Biomass in Haikou, China" Biology 11, no. 12: 1824. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11121824

APA Style

Zhang, H. -L., Nizamani, M. M., Cubino, J. P., Guo, L. -Y., Zhou, J. -J., & Wang, H. -F. (2022). Spatiotemporal Variation of Urban Plant Diversity and above Ground Biomass in Haikou, China. Biology, 11(12), 1824. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11121824

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop