Next Article in Journal
Transcriptomic and Proteomic Analyses of Myzus persicae Carrying Brassica Yellows Virus
Previous Article in Journal
Combination Effects of Integrin-linked Kinase and Abelson Kinase Inhibition on Aberrant Mitosis and Cell Death in Glioblastoma Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Winter Is (Not) Coming: Is Climate Change Helping Drosophila suzukii Overwintering?

by
Sara Sario
1,2,*,
José Melo-Ferreira
1,3,4 and
Conceição Santos
1,2
1
Biology Department, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
2
LAQV-REQUIMTE, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, 4050-453 Porto, Portugal
3
CIBIO-Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, InBIO Associate Laboratory, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal
4
BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2023, 12(7), 907; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12070907
Submission received: 3 May 2023 / Revised: 19 June 2023 / Accepted: 23 June 2023 / Published: 25 June 2023

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Drosophila suzukii, also known as the spotted-wing drosophila (SWD), is a polyphagous insect pest of soft-skinned small fruits. SWD, similar to other insects, is affected by climate change-associated factors, yet its impacts on the pest regarding its behavior, distribution, and survival remains poorly understood. Current climate change is allowing this species to colonize colder regions. This review explores how SWD adapts to survive during cold seasons, focusing on a plethora of overwintering strategies, and the transcriptomics changes in response to cold. Finally, it is discussed how climate change progression may promote the ability of this species to survive and spread, and what mitigation measures could be employed to overcome cold-adapted D. suzukii.

Abstract

Anthropogenic challenges, particularly climate change-associated factors, are strongly impacting the behavior, distribution, and survival of insects. Yet how these changes affect pests such as Drosophila suzukii, a cosmopolitan pest of soft-skinned small fruits, remains poorly understood. This polyphagous pest is chill-susceptible, with cold temperatures causing multiple stresses, including desiccation and starvation, also challenging the immune system. Since the invasion of Europe and the United States of America in 2009, it has been rapidly spreading to several European and American countries (both North and South American) and North African and Asian countries. However, globalization and global warming are allowing an altitudinal and latitudinal expansion of the species, and thus the colonization of colder regions. This review explores how D. suzukii adapts to survive during cold seasons. We focus on overwintering strategies of behavioral adaptations such as migration or sheltering, seasonal polyphenism, reproductive adaptations, as well as metabolic and transcriptomic changes in response to cold. Finally, we discuss how the continuation of climate change may promote the ability of this species to survive and spread, and what mitigation measures could be employed to overcome cold-adapted D. suzukii.

1. Introduction

Temperature plays an important role in the overall biology of insects. As poikilothermic organisms, the insects’ body temperature depends on the environment, which affects the species’ behavior, distribution, development, and reproduction [1,2]. Due to climate change and global warming, extreme events such as droughts or heat waves are becoming more frequent. Even though an overall trend of winter warming is predicted, harsher winters with longer cold spells are still expected in some regions [3,4]. During the winter, insects face specific abiotic and biotic challenges (Figure 1a), the low temperature being the most relevant abiotic pressure. In addition to internal ice formation and consequent desiccation, cold can induce chilling injuries due to alterations in metabolic processes and homeostasis [5], and it impacts the immune system, increasing susceptibility to pathogens and the inability to behaviorally avoid pathogens and predators [6]. Additionally, with lower temperatures, fewer food sources are available, forcing insects to cope with periods of starvation [4].
To overwinter, insects have developed several strategies to overcome the inability to metabolically generate heat, either by avoiding threatening cold temperatures (via migration or burrowing) or developing cold tolerance [7,8]. Cold-tolerant insects are usually classified in three main types: (1) chill susceptible, (2) freeze-avoidant (or freeze-intolerant), and (3) freeze-tolerant (Figure 1b) [9]. Chill-susceptible insects die when exposed to cold temperatures without internal ice formation. The freeze-avoiding insects can survive cold as long as they can maintain their fluids in a supercooled state, and eventually die when ice formation occurs. Freeze-tolerant species can survive cold temperatures even if their body fluids freeze, but usually can only do so over a specific temperature range [7].
Typical winter low food availability and internal body ice formation lead to desiccation. Yet, low temperatures can eventually benefit freeze-tolerant insects, as they reduce the metabolic rate, allowing survival in desiccating conditions [5]. The decrease in the metabolic activity of freeze-tolerant insects is one of the physiological adaptations involved in diapause, which can either be obligate or facultative and is characterized by a suppression of development, suspended activity, and increased resistance to cold. The success of overwintering in many insect species thus depends on diapause, which can be activated during all life stages, such as eggs, pupae, larvae, nymphs, or adults [1]. These strategies to survive cold periods are triggered by temperature, together with photoperiod or humidity cues. Such cues cause flexible changes at various levels, such as molecular, transcriptomic, hormonal, metabolic, and phenotypic, which allow for overwintering and then a post-diapause recovery [10,11].
Understanding how insects cope and survive across winters in a world impacted by climate change is fundamental not only from a conservation point of view, but also because the changing climatic dynamics may influence the population trends of invasive pest species. The spotted-wing Drosophila (SWD), Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura), is an insect pest of soft-skinned fruits with a preference for small red berries, but with the capacity to thrive on a wide variety of host species, both cultivated and non-cultivated [12]. There are currently no efficient treatments to control this pest, and available agrochemicals face sustainability or efficacy limitations [13,14]. New biocontrol strategies have been proposed and include identifying new local predators [15,16] and parasitoids [17,18], among other strategies [19]. The difficulty of managing D. suzukii populations and the damage they cause are aggravated by the fact that this pest is highly polyphagous. Drosophila suzukii has diverse food and reproductive sources available, and although it shows some preferences, it can shift between hosts depending on their availability [20]. Further, wild-caught D. suzukii during winter months has shown the capacity of this pest to overwinter, and understanding such a process may be key to developing efficient control measures. These studies are particularly of interest, as they have already proven that overwintered individuals are the primary source of infestation during the early fruiting season [21].
This review goes through alternative strategies that allow D. suzukii to survive the cold, also addressing different behavioral adaptations such as migration strategies and sheltering. It also addresses this species’ polyphenism and reproductive adaptations, as well as metabolic and transcriptomic shifts in response to cold (Figure 2). Finally, it discusses how climate change is impacting the overwintering capacity of the species and may be promoting the survival and spread of this pest, concluding with recommendations for control/preventive measures to avoid further impacts caused by cold-adapted D. suzukii.

2. Migration and Sheltering in Non-Crop Habitats

The capacity of D. suzukii females to feed and lay eggs in a wide variety of cultivated and non-cultivated host species allows this pest to have access to reproduction sites and feeding sources year-round [22,23,24,25]. We have recently demonstrated that the nutrition source modulates D. suzukii’s energetic pathways, in a way dependent on the fruits’ nutritional geometry and sex, and that females showed higher adaptability in their energetic metabolism shift to the diet [25]. Energetically more suitable hosts may provide better conditions for feeding and development success of the offspring, and support D. suzukii host preferences [26,27]. However, this dependence of energetic pathways on the nutritional source may be important in winter, when food is limited and may justify the higher plasticity of females to wider energetic plasticity.
Migration between crop and non-crop habitats has already been observed, depending on the climate and host availability [28,29,30]. When temperatures start to decrease, there is an increase in D. suzukii individuals captured in non-crop habitat traps, such as hedgerows or forests [29]. Non-crop habitats are usually rich in wild ornamental fruit types, with different ripeness stages (from unripe to fermenting or damaged fruits), providing D. suzukii adults with food and oviposition sources [28,31,32]. Furthermore, as hedgerows and forest habitats are usually more dense areas, they also provide shelter from cold and desiccation, as they have higher temperatures and humidity than crop areas [33,34,35], allowing adults to enter reproductive diapause and survive the winter until the first preferred cultivated hosts start to bear fruit [21].

3. Seasonal Polyphenism as a Thermoregulation Strategy

The invasion success of D. suzukii relies not only on its wide range of host species and migration between crop and non-crop habitats, but also on its capacity to adapt to novel environments and climates through phenotypic plasticity, particularly seasonal polyphenism [36]. Seasonal polyphenism is the ability to manifest alternative phenotypes depending on annual season in response to an environmental cue. This form of phenotypic flexibility allows for coping with different environmental conditions across seasons and maintaining adaptation year-round. Seasonal polyphenism exists in a wide diversity of animals, such as changes in pattern and color in butterflies [37], or the change from brown pelage or plumage color in the summer to white in the winter in some birds and mammals (e.g., the rock ptarmigan or the snowshoe hare) [38,39]. In D. suzukii, seasonal polyphenism occurs as a response to an environmental temperature cue, resulting in two different phenotypes depending on the season: a summer morphotype (SM), which is the most recurrent, and a winter morphotype (WM), found in colder seasons [40].
Tran et al. (2020) established a decision tree-based method to morphometrically distinguish seasonal morphs. Both WM males and females are larger than their SM counterparts, with higher wing length, wing width, and hind tibia length [41,42]. This increase in body size in ectotherms when development temperatures are lower is common across different genera and is likely due to benefits associated with heat absorption [5]. Furthermore, larger body sizes allow for increased storage of energy sources such as sugars and fats [43]. In addition to size, D. suzukii seasonal polyphenism is also observed as a difference in body color: WM adults have darker cuticles, with significantly higher abdominal melanization than SM, especially on the third (in males) and fourth (in females) abdominal segments [44]. This increase in body melanization is in accordance with the theory of thermal melanism, in which darker morphotypes have an advantage over lighter individuals in conditions with lower temperatures and low levels of solar radiation, as they will eventually heat faster than the lighter morphotypes [45].
Drosophila suzukii life cycle is closely related to temperature and photoperiod [46]. Similar to other insects, D. suzukii is chill-susceptible and can rapidly suffer at temperatures below its freezing point [47,48,49]. Winkler et al. (2021) [50] estimated that the minimum temperature for D. suzukii females’ oviposition is 13.2 °C, and for the eggs to successfully develop into adults is 14.1 °C (although with a success rate of ≈20% compared to 85% success rate when flies were kept at the optimum development temperature). At lower temperatures, larvae and pupae also have longer developmental times, and adults can take approximately one month to emerge at 9 °C [44]. The biochemical mechanisms associated with phenotypic trait expression are often induced early in the development stages, and as the development times are longer, WM adults are usually larger than SM [51].

4. Transcriptomic Changes Underlying Cold Adaptation and Survival

To date, only a few studies have explored the transcriptomic differences underlying the observed seasonal polyphenism of D. suzukii, or how these differences can influence this pest’s management. In 2016, Shearer et al. used RNA sequencing to identify transcriptomic changes underlying WM physiology. This study showed that most of the upregulated genes in the WM were involved in metabolic pathways such as glucose metabolism, tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, and glycogen metabolism. Genes involved in morphogenesis, development, and pigmentation were also upregulated in WM, explaining the phenotypic differences between the two seasonal morphs related to size and melanization. In contrast, genes involved in reproduction/oogenesis, such as those associated with the chorion, eggshell formation, or oogenesis were downregulated in the WM [44]. These differences in transcript levels were also estimated by Toxopeus et al. (2016) when analyzing the differences in the expression of genes between WM and SM by RT-qPCR, with WM showing higher levels of stress-related gene transcripts (Catalase (Cat), Superoxide dismutase (Sod), heat shock proteins (HSP)) than SM flies, as well as diapause regulation (cpo and foxo), with no expression of the Yp1 gene (vitellogenesis) detected in WM females [52]. In another study, Eriquez and Colinet (2019) acclimated 5-day-old adults to cold at 10 °C from 2 h to 9 days and showed that cold-acclimated flies had improved cold survival when compared to non-acclimated flies. Cold-acclimated and non-acclimated flies were in a chill coma after being exposed at 0 °C for 12 h, however, flies acclimated at 10 °C for 9 days had the fastest chill coma recovery time compared to the other acclimation regimes. When comparing the transcriptome of adults acclimated at 10 °C for 9 days to the non-acclimated adults, they found several upregulated and downregulated genes in the cold-acclimated flies. Most of the upregulated genes had GO-terms associated with ion transport, important to maintain ion and water homeostasis; GO-terms associated with neuronal activity and carbohydrate metabolism were also enriched. In contrast, and in accordance with the findings of Shearer et al. (2016) and Toxopeus et al. (2016), there was a downregulation of genes associated with oogenesis, suggesting that at 10 °C females will likely enter reproductive arrest [44,52,53].
The identification of these physiological changes that allow the survival of D. suzukii at colder temperatures is of the utmost importance not only to understand the thermal plasticity of this species, but also to develop SWD-focused management strategies. In fact, differences in the effect of insecticides between SM and WM have been suggested, especially Spinetoram, with WM appearing to be less susceptible than SM [54]. Additionally, monitoring traps are less efficient during the winter, which could be associated with differences in the response to volatiles between SM and WM [55]. Schwanitz et al. (2022) found several differentially expressed genes between SM and WM associated with the olfactory behavior of D. suzukii, namely those linked to food-seeking and mating behaviors, reinforcing previous work that suggested that WM flies have different food preferences than SM [56,57]. Considering that the flies surviving the winter are the most concerning at the beginning of the fruiting season [21], it is essential to understand these transcriptomic differences between SM and WM, to develop management practices targeted at WM flies and therefore reduce the impact of the winter survivors on the first fruits.

5. Reproductive Arrest in Winter Morphs as a Result of A metabolic Trade-Off

As the transcriptomic studies showed, the downregulation of several genes associated with reproduction in WM when compared to SM points to a reproductive arrest of WM flies. In the field, females with immature ovaries start to appear in traps during winter, also with fewer eggs than females captured in summer [46,58]. This is a result of delayed ovarian development at cold temperatures and could also be the result of a shift in the females’ metabolism when faced with adverse conditions. Additionally, more than 50% of males captured in the same period do not have sperm in their testes, but females usually already have sperm stored in their spermathecae ready to be used as females exit their reproductive arrest phase [59].
High energy reserves are necessary for females to invest in oogenesis and reproduction; however, at cold temperatures, these energy reserves are required to survive and instead of being invested in reproduction, there is a metabolic shift towards survival and extending adult lifespan [60,61]. Cold-acclimated D. suzukii individuals have an increased accumulation of cryoprotectant molecules such as carbohydrates, polyols, or amino acids [62], which is in line with the increase in the expression of genes associated with metabolic pathways found in transcriptomic studies, therefore revealing a metabolic trade-off of survival vs. reproduction. When D. suzukii females enter a reproductive diapause, they are capable of surviving longer periods and being more cold-tolerant than flies not entering reproductive diapause [58]. This reproductive diapause is then rapidly reverted, as observed by Cloutier et al., 2022, as flies that entered diapause were capable of reproducing successfully with non-diapause flies when temperatures became warmer [63].

6. How Is Climate Change Affecting D. suzukii Survival?

The impact of climate change on insect species is complex and difficult to isolate given its interdependence with many other anthropogenic stressors, such as insecticides, agricultural intensification, or deforestation, according to Wagner et al. (2021) [64]. Diverse factors are changing the population dynamics of agricultural insect pests, including the globalization of trade, which accelerates the epidemiological distribution of exotic pests; the controversial use of agrochemicals, often also affecting endemic or beneficial insects or promoting resistance in the pest population; and particularly the ongoing climate change, which tends to provide conditions to widen the geographic distribution of pests [64]. However, climate change impacts not only agricultural insect pests but also their hosts, as temperature changes eventually affect pest–host relationships and the relations of the pests with other insects, such as natural enemies [1]. The global increase in temperature during winter is one of the most important marks of climate change, even though in some regions winters are predicted to become harsher and with sudden cold spells [3,4]. In D. suzukii, the injury associated with cold-stress increases as temperatures decrease. However, cold acclimation improves cold tolerance to moderate or even intense cold-stress exposures [48,53,65], and their survival is especially improved when flies are exposed to fluctuating thermal regimes, which often occur during more temperate winters [66]. When exposed to 3 °C for 20 h and a small daily warm period (1 h20 at 25 °C), with some gradual cooling and warming mimicking natural environments, D. suzukii flies do not enter reproductive arrest and the warmer periods allow them to recover from desiccation [67]. With such a complex cold adaptation, as well as rapid cold-stress recovery, we can predict that warmer winters will help D. suzukii thrive in regions where it is now established, with a decreasing need to overwinter and enter reproductive diapause. Such conditions will allow to produce a higher number of generations per year [68], which may dramatically increase the demographic potential of the species and promote population growth. Additionally, warming winters in regions that are currently inhospitable for the species may promote new colonization of these regions and increase the invasive capacity of the species [69,70]. A wider area of D. suzukii presence worldwide and higher demographic potential will therefore lead to more fruit losses and economic damage.

7. Conclusions

Climate change provides a new paradigm regarding D. suzukii, as it promotes the dissemination of this pest in regions previously considered not ideal for its development, whilst promoting further adaptations to survive in new environmental conditions. Moreover, temperature fluctuations could have an impact on natural enemies (such as nematodes and arthropods), reducing their activity and impairing the control of D. suzukii.
Knowing that D. suzukii WM respond differently to the olfactory cues present in traps optimized for SM, together with their demonstrated higher resistance to insecticides, it is of great importance to develop new strategies focused on WM such as traps with different attractive compounds to be applied during winter (off-season) periods. This can prevent a higher incidence of this pest during producing seasons, whilst promoting a reduction in the use of harmful insecticides. Furthermore, producers should be informed and advised by phytosanitary agents to take into account these adaptations and maintain some IPM strategies year-round (e.g., mass trapping, attract-and-kill). Further studies should be conducted to understand the overwintering adaptations of D. suzukii and double down on the research of new specific traps/compounds and ecological management strategies to control the pest during winter periods, with emphasis on WM.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S.; investigation, S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S.; writing—review and editing, S.S., J.M.-F., and C.S.; supervision, J.M.-F., C.S.; project administration, S.S., J.M.-F., C.S.; funding acquisition, S.S., J.M.-F., C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by COMPETE2020, under the project STOP.SUZUKII, grant number POCI-01-0247-FEDER-047034, and Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia and Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior, through the project with the grant numbers UIDB/50006/2020 | UIDP/50006/2020, and DrosuGreen project with the grant number PTDC/ASP-PLA/4477/2020. The APC was funded by COMPETE2020, under the project STOP.SUZUKII, grant number POCI-01-0247-FEDER-047034. Sara Sario and José Melo-Ferreira work was financed by Fundação Para a Ciência e Tecnologia, grant number SFRH/BD/138186/2018 and CEEC contract 2021.00150.CEECIND respectively.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Skendžić, S.; Zovko, M.; Živković, I.P.; Lešić, V.; Lemić, D. The Impact of Climate Change on Agricultural Insect Pests. Insects 2021, 12, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Schneider, L.; Rebetez, M.; Rasmann, S. The Effect of Climate Change on Invasive Crop Pests across Biomes. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2022, 50, 100895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sutton, A.O.; Studd, E.K.; Fernandes, T.; Bates, A.E.; Bramburger, A.J.; Cooke, S.J.; Hayden, B.; Henry, H.A.L.; Humphries, M.M.; Martin, R.; et al. Frozen out: Unanswered Questions about Winter Biology. Environ. Rev. 2021, 29, 431–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Williams, C.M.; Henry, H.A.L.; Sinclair, B.J. Cold Truths: How Winter Drives Responses of Terrestrial Organisms to Climate Change. Biol. Rev. 2015, 90, 214–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Teets, N.M.; Marshall, K.E.; Reynolds, J.A. Molecular Mechanisms of Winter Survival. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2023, 68, 319–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sinclair, B.J.; Ferguson, L.V.; Salehipour-Shirazi, G.; Macmillan, H.A. Cross-Tolerance and Cross-Talk in the Cold: Relating Low Temperatures to Desiccation and Immune Stress in Insects. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2013, 53, 545–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Lee, R.E. A Primer on Insect Cold-Tolerance. In Low. Temperature Biology of Insects; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010; pp. 3–34. [Google Scholar]
  8. Toxopeus, J.; Sinclair, B.J. Mechanisms Underlying Insect Freeze Tolerance. Biol. Rev. 2018, 93, 1891–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sinclair, B.J.; Coello Alvarado, L.E.; Ferguson, L.V. An Invitation to Measure Insect Cold Tolerance: Methods, Approaches, and Workflow. J. Biol. 2015, 53, 180–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Overgaard, J.; Sørensen, J.G.; Loeschcke, V. Genetic Variability and Evolution of Cold-Tolerance. In Low Temperature Biology of Insects; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010; pp. 276–296. [Google Scholar]
  11. Xue, Q.; Majeed, M.Z.; Zhang, W.; Ma, C. Adaptation of Drosophila Species to Climate Change—A Literature Review since 2003. J. Integr. Agric. 2019, 18, 805–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Poyet, M.; le Roux, V.; Gibert, P.; Meirland, A.; Prévost, G.; Eslin, P.; Chabrerie, O. The Wide Potential Trophic Niche of the Asiatic Fruit Fly Drosophila suzukii: The Key of Its Invasion Success in Temperate Europe? PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0142785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Shawer, R. Chemical Control of Drosophila suzukii. In Drosophila suzukii Management; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Falkenberg, T.; Ekesi, S.; Borgemeister, C. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and One Health—A Call for Action to Integrate. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2022, 53, 100960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sario, S.; Santos, C.; Gonçalves, F.; Torres, L. DNA Screening of Drosophila suzukii Predators in Berry Field Orchards Shows New Predatory Taxonomical Groups. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0249673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wolf, S.; Zeisler, C.; Sint, D.; Romeis, J.; Traugott, M.; Collatz, J. A Simple and Cost-Effective Molecular Method to Track Predation on Drosophila suzukii in the Field. J. Pest. Sci. (2004) 2018, 91, 927–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wollmann, J.; Schlesener, D.; Ferreira, M.; Garcia, F. Parasitoids of Drosophilidae with Potential for Parasitism on Drosophila suzukii in Brazil. Dros. Inf. Serv. 2016, 99, 38–42. [Google Scholar]
  18. Modic, Š.; Žigon, P.; Razinger, J. Trichopria Drosophilae (Diapriidae) and Leptopilina Heterotoma (Figitidae), Native Parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii, Confirmed in Slovenia. Acta Agric. Slov. 2019, 113, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Tait, G.; Mermer, S.; Stockton, D.; Lee, J.; Avosani, S.; Abrieux, A.; Anfora, G.; Beers, E.; Biondi, A.; Burrack, H.; et al. Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae): A Decade of Research towards a Sustainable Integrated Pest Management Program. J. Econ. Entomol. 2021, 114, 1950–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Clymans, R.; van Kerckvoorde, V.; Bangels, E.; Akkermans, W.; Alhmedi, A.; de Clercq, P.; Beliën, T.; Bylemans, D. Olfactory Preference of Drosophila suzukii Shifts between Fruit and Fermentation Cues over the Season: Effects of Physiological Status. Insects 2019, 10, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Panel, A.D.C.; Zeeman, L.; van der Sluis, B.J.; van Elk, P.; Pannebakker, B.A.; Wertheim, B.; Helsen, H.H.M. Overwintered Drosophila suzukii Are the Main Source for Infestations of the First Fruit Crops of the Season. Insects 2018, 9, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Champagne-Cauchon, W.; Guay, J.F.; Fournier, V.; Cloutier, C. Phenology and Spatial Distribution of Spotted-Wing Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Lowbush Blueberry (Ericaceae) in Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Québec, Canada. Can. Entomol. 2020, 152, 432–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zerulla, F.N.; Schmidt, S.; Streitberger, M.; Zebitz, C.P.W.; Zelger, R. On the Overwintering Ability of Drosophila suzukii in South Tyrol. J. Berry Res. 2015, 5, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Thistlewood, H.M.A.; Gill, P.; Beers, E.H.; Shearer, P.W.; Walsh, D.B.; Rozema, B.M.; Acheampong, S.; Castagnoli, S.; Yee, W.L.; Smytheman, P.; et al. Spatial Analysis of Seasonal Dynamics and Overwintering of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in the Okanagan-Columbia Basin, 2010–2014. Environ. Entomol. 2018, 47, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Sario, S.; Mendes, R.J.; Gonçalves, F.; Torres, L.; Santos, C. Drosophila suzukii Energetic Pathways Are Differently Modulated by Nutritional Geometry in Males and Females. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 21194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Olazcuaga, L.; Baltenweck, R.; Leménager, N.; Maia-Grondard, A.; Claudel, P.; Hugueney, P.; Foucaud, J. Metabolic Consequences of Various Fruit-Based Diets in a Generalist Insect Species. Elife 2023, 12, e84370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Olazcuaga, L.; Rode, N.O.; Foucaud, J.; Facon, B.; Ravigné, V.; Ausset, A.; Leménager, N.; Loiseau, A.; Gautier, M.; Estoup, A.; et al. Oviposition Preference and Larval Performance of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae), Spotted-Wing Drosophila: Effects of Fruit Identity and Composition. Environ. Entomol. 2019, 48, 867–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Arnó, J.; Solà, M.; Riudavets, J.; Gabarra, R. Population Dynamics, Non-Crop Hosts, and Fruit Susceptibility of Drosophila suzukii in Northeast Spain. J. Pest. Sci. (2004) 2016, 89, 713–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Buck, N.; Fountain, M.T.; Potts, S.G.; Bishop, J.; Garratt, M.P.D. The Effects of Non-Crop Habitat on Spotted Wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii) Abundance in Fruit Systems: A Meta-Analysis. Agric. Entomol. 2022, 25, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Elsensohn, J.; Loeb, G. Non-Crop Host Sampling Yields Insights into Small-Scale Population Dynamics of Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura). Insects 2018, 9, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Lee, J.C.; Dreves, A.J.; Cave, A.M.; Kawai, S.; Isaacs, R.; Miller, J.C.; Van Timmeren, S.; Bruck, D.J. Infestation of Wild and Ornamental Noncrop Fruits by Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2015, 108, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kienzle, R.; Rohlfs, M. Mind the Wound!—Fruit Injury Ranks Higher than, and Interacts with, Heterospecific Cues for Drosophila suzukii Oviposition. Insects 2021, 12, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tochen, S.; Woltz, J.M.; Dalton, D.T.; Lee, J.C.; Wiman, N.G.; Walton, V.M. Humidity Affects Populations of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Blueberry. J. Appl. Entomol. 2016, 140, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Winkler, A.; Jung, J.; Kleinhenz, B.; Racca, P. A Review on Temperature and Humidity Effects on Drosophila suzukii Population Dynamics. Agric. Entomol. 2020, 22, 179–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Guédot, C.; Avanesyan, A.; Hietala-Henschell, K. Effect of Temperature and Humidity on the Seasonal Phenology of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Wisconsin. Environ. Entomol. 2018, 47, 1365–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Stockton, D.G.; Wallingford, A.K.; Loeb, G.M. Phenotypic Plasticity Promotes Overwintering Survival in A Globally Invasive Crop Pest, Drosophila suzukii. Insects 2018, 9, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Brakefield, P.M.; Frankino, W.A. Polyphenisms in Lepidoptera: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Studies of Evolution and Development. In Phenotypic Plasticity of Insects: Mechanisms and Consequences; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2009; pp. 337–368. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zimova, M.; Hackländer, K.; Good, J.M.; Melo-Ferreira, J.; Alves, P.C.; Mills, L.S. Function and Underlying Mechanisms of Seasonal Colour Moulting in Mammals and Birds: What Keeps Them Changing in a Warming World? Biol. Rev. 2018, 93, 1478–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Mills, L.S.; Zimova, M.; Oyler, J.; Running, S.; Abatzoglou, J.T.; Lukacs, P.M. Camouflage Mismatch in Seasonal Coat Color Due to Decreased Snow Duration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 7360–7365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Leach, H.; Stone, J.; van Timmeren, S.; Isaacs, R. Stage-Specific and Seasonal Induction of the Overwintering Morph of Spotted Wing Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Insect Sci. 2019, 19, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tran, A.K.; Hutchison, W.D.; Asplen, M.K. Morphometric Criteria to Differentiate Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) Seasonal Morphs. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0228780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Stockton, D.G.; Wallingford, A.K.; Brind’amore, G.; Diepenbrock, L.; Burrack, H.; Leach, H.; Isaacs, R.; Iglesias, L.E.; Liburd, O.; Drummond, F.; et al. Seasonal Polyphenism of Spotted-Wing Drosophila Is Affected by Variation in Local Abiotic Conditions within Its Invaded Range, Likely Influencing Survival and Regional Population Dynamics. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 7669–7685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chakraborty, A.; Walter, G.M.; Monro, K.; Alves, A.N.; Mirth, C.K.; Sgrò, C.M. Within-Population Variation in Body Size Plasticity in Response to Combined Nutritional and Thermal Stress Is Partially Independent from Variation in Development Time. J. Evol. Biol. 2022, 36, 264–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shearer, P.W.; West, J.D.; Walton, V.M.; Brown, P.H.; Svetec, N.; Chiu, J.C. Seasonal Cues Induce Phenotypic Plasticity of Drosophila suzukii to Enhance Winter Survival. BMC Ecol. 2016, 16, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Clusella Trullas, S.; van Wyk, J.H.; Spotila, J.R. Thermal Melanism in Ectotherms. J. Biol. 2007, 32, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wallingford, A.K.; Lee, J.C.; Loeb, G.M. The Influence of Temperature and Photoperiod on the Reproductive Diapause and Cold Tolerance of Spotted-Wing Drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2016, 159, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Dalton, D.T.; Walton, V.M.; Shearer, P.W.; Walsh, D.B.; Caprile, J.; Isaacs, R. Laboratory Survival of Drosophila suzukii under Simulated Winter Conditions of the Pacific Northwest and Seasonal Field Trapping in Five Primary Regions of Small and Stone Fruit Production in the United States. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 1368–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Enriquez, T.; Colinet, H. Basal Tolerance to Heat and Cold Exposure of the Spotted Wing Drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. PeerJ 2017, 5, e3112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Ryan, G.D.; Emiljanowicz, L.; Wilkinson, F.; Kornya, M.; Newman, J.A. Thermal Tolerances of the Spotted-Wing Drosophila Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2016, 109, 746–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Winkler, A.; Jung, J.; Kleinhenz, B.; Racca, P. Estimating Temperature Effects on Drosophila suzukii Life Cycle Parameters. Agric. Entomol. 2021, 23, 361–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hamby, K.A.; Bellamy, D.E.; Chiu, J.C.; Lee, J.C.; Walton, V.M.; Wiman, N.G.; York, R.M.; Biondi, A. Biotic and Abiotic Factors Impacting Development, Behavior, Phenology, and Reproductive Biology of Drosophila suzukii. J. Pest. Sci. (2004) 2016, 89, 605–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Toxopeus, J.; Jakobs, R.; Ferguson, L.V.; Gariepy, T.D.; Sinclair, B.J. Reproductive Arrest and Stress Resistance in Winter-Acclimated Drosophila suzukii. J. Insect Physiol. 2016, 89, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Enriquez, T.; Colinet, H. Cold Acclimation Triggers Major Transcriptional Changes in Drosophila suzukii. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Seong, K.M.; Sun, W.; Huang, J.; Gut, L.; Kim, Y.H.; Pittendrigh, B.R. Comparative Response of Two Seasonal Spotted Wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii) Morphs to Different Classes of Insecticides. Entomol. Res. 2022, 52, 504–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kirkpatrick, D.M.; Leach, H.L.; Xu, P.; Dong, K.; Isaacs, R.; Gut, L.J. Comparative Antennal and Behavioral Responses of Summer and Winter Morph Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) to Ecologically Relevant Volatiles. Env. Entomol. 2018, 47, 700–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Schwanitz, T.W.; Polashock, J.J.; Stockton, D.G.; Rodriguez-Saona, C.; Sotomayor, D.; Loeb, G.; Hawkings, C. Molecular and Behavioral Studies Reveal Differences in Olfaction between Winter and Summer Morphs of Drosophila suzukii. PeerJ 2022, 10, e13825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Stockton, D.G.; Brown, R.; Loeb, G.M. Not Berry Hungry? Discovering the Hidden Food Sources of a Small Fruit Specialist, Drosophila suzukii. Ecol. Entomol. 2019, 44, 810–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhai, Y.; Lin, Q.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, F.; Zheng, L.; Yu, Y. Adult Reproductive Diapause in Drosophila suzukii Females. J. Pest. Sci. (2004) 2016, 89, 679–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Grassi, A.; Gottardello, A.; Dalton, D.T.; Tait, G.; Rendon, D.; Ioriatti, C.; Gibeaut, D.; Rossi Stacconi, M.V.; Walton, V.M. Seasonal Reproductive Biology of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Temperate Climates. Environ. Entomol. 2018, 47, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Mattila, J.; Hietakangas, V. Regulation of Carbohydrate Energy Metabolism in Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetics 2017, 207, 1231–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gillette, C.M.; Tennessen, J.M.; Reis, T. Balancing Energy Expenditure and Storage with Growth and Biosynthesis during Drosophila Development. Dev. Biol. 2021, 475, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Enriquez, T.; Renault, D.; Charrier, M.; Colinet, H. Cold Acclimation Favors Metabolic Stability in Drosophila suzukii. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Cloutier, C.; Guay, J.-F.; Champagne-Cauchon, W. Postdiapause Reproduction of Spotted-Wing Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Realistically Simulated Cold Climatic Springtime Conditions of Québec, Canada. Can. Entomol. 2022, 154, e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wagner, D.L.; Grames, E.M.; Forister, M.L.; Berenbaum, M.R.; Stopak, D. Insect Decline in the Anthropocene: Death by a Thousand Cuts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2023989118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tarapacki, P.; Jørgensen, L.B.; Sørensen, J.G.; Andersen, M.K.; Colinet, H.; Overgaard, J. Acclimation, Duration and Intensity of Cold Exposure Determine the Rate of Cold Stress Accumulation and Mortality in Drosophila suzukii. J. Insect Physiol. 2021, 135, 104323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Enriquez, T.; Ruel, D.; Charrier, M.; Colinet, H. Effects of Fluctuating Thermal Regimes on Cold Survival and Life History Traits of the Spotted Wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii). Insect Sci. 2018, 33, 1744–7917.12649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Grumiaux, C.; Andersen, M.K.; Colinet, H.; Overgaard, J. Fluctuating Thermal Regime Preserves Physiological Homeostasis and Reproductive Capacity in Drosophila suzukii. J. Insect Physiol. 2019, 113, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Ometto, L.; Cestaro, A.; Ramasamy, S.; Grassi, A.; Revadi, S.; Siozios, S.; Moretto, M.; Fontana, P.; Varotto, C.; Pisani, D.; et al. Linking Genomics and Ecology to Investigate the Complex Evolution of an Invasive Drosophila Pest. Genome Biol. Evol. 2013, 5, 745–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Reyes, J.A.; Lira-Noriega, A. Current and Future Global Potential Distribution of the Fruit Fly Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Can. Entomol. 2020, 152, 587–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dos Santos, L.A.; Mendes, M.F.; Krüger, A.P.; Blauth, M.L.; Gottschalk, M.S.; Garcia, F.R.M. Global Potential Distribution of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera, Drosophilidae). PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0174318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Biotic and abiotic challenges of winter (a) and cold-tolerant insect types (b).
Figure 1. Biotic and abiotic challenges of winter (a) and cold-tolerant insect types (b).
Biology 12 00907 g001
Figure 2. Drosophila suzukii overwintering strategies. When the temperature starts to drop, adult flies take shelter in non-crop habitats, using non-crop hosts as food and reproduction sources; immature stages such as pupae often take shelter in leaf litter. The adults that are capable of emerging after cold exposure have developed seasonal polyphenism, being larger and darker (winter morphotypes), as well as exhibiting reproductive arrest and changes at the metabolic and transcriptomic levels.
Figure 2. Drosophila suzukii overwintering strategies. When the temperature starts to drop, adult flies take shelter in non-crop habitats, using non-crop hosts as food and reproduction sources; immature stages such as pupae often take shelter in leaf litter. The adults that are capable of emerging after cold exposure have developed seasonal polyphenism, being larger and darker (winter morphotypes), as well as exhibiting reproductive arrest and changes at the metabolic and transcriptomic levels.
Biology 12 00907 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sario, S.; Melo-Ferreira, J.; Santos, C. Winter Is (Not) Coming: Is Climate Change Helping Drosophila suzukii Overwintering? Biology 2023, 12, 907. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12070907

AMA Style

Sario S, Melo-Ferreira J, Santos C. Winter Is (Not) Coming: Is Climate Change Helping Drosophila suzukii Overwintering? Biology. 2023; 12(7):907. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12070907

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sario, Sara, José Melo-Ferreira, and Conceição Santos. 2023. "Winter Is (Not) Coming: Is Climate Change Helping Drosophila suzukii Overwintering?" Biology 12, no. 7: 907. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12070907

APA Style

Sario, S., Melo-Ferreira, J., & Santos, C. (2023). Winter Is (Not) Coming: Is Climate Change Helping Drosophila suzukii Overwintering? Biology, 12(7), 907. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12070907

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop