Next Article in Journal
Provincial Differences and Dynamic Changes in Mariculture Efficiency in China: Based on Super-SBM Model and Global Malmquist Index
Next Article in Special Issue
Water Contamination Risks at the Dental Clinic
Previous Article in Journal
Glucose Favors Lipid Anabolic Metabolism in the Invasive Breast Cancer Cell Line MDA-MB-231
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

We Do Not Eat Alone: Formation and Maturation of the Oral Microbiota

Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences, Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Policlinico G. Martino, Via Consolare Valeria, 98100 Messina, Italy
Biology 2020, 9(1), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9010017
Submission received: 12 December 2019 / Revised: 5 January 2020 / Accepted: 10 January 2020 / Published: 13 January 2020

Abstract

:
From the earliest moments of life, contact with the outside world and with other individuals invalidates the sterility of the oral cavity. The oral cavity passes from a sterility condition, that is present only during intrauterine life, to a condition in which a microbiota organizes and evolves itself, accompanying the person throughout their life. Depending on a patient’s age, systemic conditions and/or oral conditions, different characteristics of the oral microbiome are shown. By verifying and analyzing this process it is possible to understand what is at the basis of the etiopathogenesis of some oral pathologies, and also the function of the oral microbiome.

The anatomical diversity of the oral cavity forms different habitats, with different physical and chemical factors. These niches (lips, cheeks, palate, teeth, gingival sulcus) are suitable for different microbial populations. It is necessary to consider that the oral microbiota has great plasticity over time; both short term (during a day), and long term (during the lifetime). Analyzing the oral microbiota, and the different habitats, it can be easily concluded that the colonizable surfaces are different [1,2,3,4].
In fact, the oral cavity is characterized by hard tissue, such as enamel, which does not exfoliate, and thus allows for a stable colonization, and soft tissues, which undergo renewal and exfoliation and a final habitat, defined as the crevicular area, which has specific characteristics with respect to bacterial colonization.
The oral cavity is also characterized by a high humidity, guaranteed by the presence of saliva and crevicular liquid. Saliva has a cleansing and other important functions during the chewing phases. It is produced in a quantity of about 800–1500 mL/day. Although saliva has an important antibacterial function, it contains proteins or glycoproteins, which favor the formation of the acquired enamel film (enamel pellicle). The enamel film allows the adhesion of bacteria and therefore, the formation of plaque. On the other hand, the crevicular fluid is an exudate of plasmatic origin [5,6,7,8,9].
There are chemical and physical factors that influence the oral microbiota, such as temperature, pH, anaerobic conditions, age, hormonal variations, hygiene, type of diet, presence of systemic diseases or the use of drugs, all of which affect bacterial colonization (Figure 1) [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16].
While the oral cavity is host to microbes that belong to different species, in general, the predominant bacteria in the mouth are Streptococci. The oral cavity is sterile at birth, but bacterial colonization already begins within 6–10 h, and undergoes maturation and changes over the following hours. The changes of the oral microbiota are not due only to the passage of time, but as previously specified, also due to other co-factors, and to the oral anatomical condition changes. The newborn’s edentulous mouth has no teeth, no hard surfaces, and anaerobic condition habitats, such as the gingival sulcus. For this reason, the anaerobic bacteria in these phases are scarce (Veillonella Fusobacteria and Peptostreptococci), to the detriment of the optional aerobic-anaerobic colonizers such as Streptococci, in particular the Streptococcus salivarius. During the eruption phases, the microbiome changes, as a result of the colonization of not exfoliating hard surfaces. This change could occur by Streptococcus sanguis, Neisseria sicca, Streptococcus mitis, or Streptococcus mutans that leads to the formation of the first plaque. Tartar originates from plaque calcification [17,18,19].
Subsequent to the formation of the enamel film, which takes place a few seconds after having performed the oral hygiene maneuvers, the tooth surfaces are colonized. The initial phase lasts about 8 h, in these phases the Streptococci (S. sanguis, S. mitis) and some Neisserie (N. sicca) lead to the formation of microcolonies. The subsequent phases see the maturation of the plaque, which leads to non-quantitative but qualitative changes. In fact, anaerobic conditions are realized, and receptor structures are formed which indicate a bacterial interaction. The formation of plaque layers makes the bacteria resistant to both drugs and host responses [20,21,22,23].
Following this, it is possible to distinguish a supragingival plaque from a subgingival plaque. The supragingival plaque is mainly composed of streptococci (S. sanguis, S. mitis, S. mutans); actinomycetes (Actinomyces viscosus) and Veilonelle. It is, however, necessary to consider that some of these bacterial species are antagonistic, and for this reason, they tend to colonize different habitats, for example, the Streptococcus mutans is present on the occlusal and approximal faces of the teeth, while the Streptococcus sanguis is on the smooth teeth surfaces. Subgingival plaque, characterized by conditions of anaerobiosis, is highly variable. The structure of the subgingival plaque has some similarities with that of the supragingival plaque, especially when it comes to plaque associated with gingivitis without the formation of a deep sulcus. The bacteria include Gram-positive and Gram-negative cocci and filamentous organisms. Spirochetes and various flagellated bacteria could be encountered, especially in the most apical areas of the plaque. The most superficial layer is often less densely colonized, and the leukocytes are regularly interposed between the plaque and the epithelial lining of the gingival sulcus. When a periodontal sulcus forms, the appearance of subgingival bacterial deposits becomes complex [24]. In this case, the tooth surface could be represented by both the enamel and the cement, from which the periodontal fibers have been detached. Filamentous microorganisms predominate in this layer of plaque, but cocci and rods are also found. On the other hand, in the deeper parts of the periodontal sulcus, the filamentous microorganisms become increasingly scarce, and in fact, seem to be absent in the most apical portion. Instead, the dense bacterial deposit that faces the tooth surface is dominated by smaller microorganisms, with no particular orientation. It is precisely during these phases of colonization that it is possible to create the conditions for the formation of colonies of aggressive bacteria against host tissues, such as Campylobacter rectus, Prevotella Intermedia and Porphyromonas gingivalis [25,26,27,28,29,30].
Bacterial plaque is not only formed on the surface of natural teeth, but also on artificial surfaces exposed to the oral environment, including implant surfaces. The similarities between peri-implant microbial and subgingival deposits have been clearly demonstrated by cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, and it is possible to state that the structure of peri-implant plaque deposits may resemble those encountered in the subgingival environment. The presence of a complex biofilm could have repercussions at the systemic level, or even have repercussions on surgical operations performed in the oral cavity [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39].
In addition, bacterial metabolism of the multiple species found in plaque could lead to the formation of catabolites that could damage oral tissues [40,41,42,43,44].
Surely being able to fully understand these mechanisms could lead to therapies and preventive techniques aimed at the formation of a less aggressive plaque, or to inhibit these phenomena.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dominy, S.S.; Lynch, C.; Ermini, F.; Benedyk, M.; Marczyk, A.; Konradi, A.; Nguyen, M.; Haditsch, U.; Raha, D.; Griffin, C.; et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis in Alzheimer’s disease brains: Evidence for disease causation and treatment with small-molecule inhibitors. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaau3333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Putsep, K.; Carlsson, G.; Boman, H.G.; Andersson, M. Deficiency of antibacterial peptides in patients with morbus Kostmann: An observation study. Lancet 2002, 360, 1144–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Poole, D.F.; Newman, H.N. Dental plaque and oral health. Nature 1971, 234, 329–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pihlstrom, B.L.; Michalowicz, B.S.; Johnson, N.W. Periodontal diseases. Lancet 2005, 366, 1809–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Holt, S.C.; Ebersole, J.; Felton, J.; Brunsvold, M.; Kornman, K.S. Implantation of Bacteroides gingivalis in nonhuman primates initiates progression of periodontitis. Science 1988, 239, 55–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bjertness, E.; Hansen, B.F.; Berseth, G.; Gronnesby, J.K. Oral hygiene and periodontitis in young adults. Lancet 1993, 342, 1170–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fiorillo, L. Oral Health: The First Step to Well-Being. Medicina 2019, 55, 676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hanisch, M.; Hoffmann, T.; Bohner, L.; Hanisch, L.; Benz, K.; Kleinheinz, J.; Jackowski, J. Rare Diseases with Periodontal Manifestations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zimmerman, J.N.; Custodio, W.; Hatibovic-Kofman, S.; Lee, Y.H.; Xiao, Y.; Siqueira, W.L. Proteome and peptidome of human acquired enamel pellicle on deciduous teeth. Int. J. Mol Sci 2013, 14, 920–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Vukosavljevic, D.; Hutter, J.L.; Helmerhorst, E.J.; Xiao, Y.; Custodio, W.; Zaidan, F.C.; Oppenheim, F.G.; Siqueira, W.L. Nanoscale adhesion forces between enamel pellicle proteins and hydroxyapatite. J. Dent Res. 2014, 93, 514–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ventura, T.; Cassiano, L.P.S.; Souza, E.S.C.M.; Taira, E.A.; Leite, A.L.; Rios, D.; Buzalaf, M.A.R. The proteomic profile of the acquired enamel pellicle according to its location in the dental arches. Arch. Oral Biol. 2017, 79, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Valente, M.T.; Moffa, E.B.; Crosara, K.T.B.; Xiao, Y.; de Oliveira, T.M.; Machado, M.; Siqueira, W.L. Acquired Enamel Pellicle Engineered Peptides: Effects on Hydroxyapatite Crystal Growth. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Stojsin, I.; Brkanic, T.; Zivkovic, S. The effect of gastric juice on the development of erosive changes in hard dental tissue. Srpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo 2014, 142, 413–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Siqueira, W.L.; Oppenheim, F.G. Small molecular weight proteins/peptides present in the in vivo formed human acquired enamel pellicle. Arch. Oral Biol. 2009, 54, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Mutahar, M.; O’Toole, S.; Carpenter, G.; Bartlett, D.; Andiappan, M.; Moazzez, R. Reduced statherin in acquired enamel pellicle on eroded teeth compared to healthy teeth in the same subjects: An in-vivo study. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0183660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Lindhe, J. Parodontologia Clinica e Implantologia Orale, 5th ed.; Karring, N.P.L.T., Ed.; Edi Ermes: Milano, Italy, 2009; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  17. Germano, F.; Bramanti, E.; Arcuri, C.; Cecchetti, F.; Cicciù, M. Atomic force microscopy of bacteria from periodontal subgingival biofilm: Preliminary study results. Eur. J. Dent. 2013, 7, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Herford, A.S.; Lu, M.; Akin, L.; Cicciù, M. Evaluation of a porcine matrix with and without platelet-derived growth factor for bone graft coverage in pigs. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2012, 27, 1351–1358. [Google Scholar]
  19. Maiorana, C.; Beretta, M.; Grossi, G.B.; Santoro, F.; Herford, A.S.; Nagursky, H.; Cicciù, M. Histomorphometric evaluation of anorganic bovine bone coverage to reduce autogenous grafts resorption: Preliminary results. Open Dent. J. 2011, 5, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Cicciù, M.; Risitano, G.; Lo Giudice, G.; Bramanti, E. Periodontal health and caries prevalence evaluation in patients affected by Parkinson’s disease. Parkinson’s Dis. 2012, 2012, 541908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fiorillo, L.; Cervino, G.; Herford, A.S.; Lauritano, F.; D’Amico, C.; Lo Giudice, R.; Laino, L.; Troiano, G.; Crimi, S.; Cicciu, M. Interferon Crevicular Fluid Profile and Correlation with Periodontal Disease and Wound Healing: A Systemic Review of Recent Data. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Fiorillo, L. Chlorhexidine Gel Use in the Oral District: A Systematic Review. Gels 2019, 5, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Giudice, G.; Cicciù, M.; Cervino, G.; Lizio, A.; Visco, A. Flowable resin and marginal gap on tooth third medial cavity involving enamel and radicular cementum: A SEM evaluation of two restoration techniques. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2012, 23, 763–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Trovato, F.M.; Martines, G.F.; Brischetto, D.; Catalano, D.; Musumeci, G.; Trovato, G.M. Fatty liver disease and lifestyle in youngsters: Diet, food intake frequency, exercise, sleep shortage and fashion. Liver Int. 2016, 36, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. De Stefano, R. Psychological Factors in Dental Patient Care: Odontophobia. Medicina 2019, 55, 678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Cervino, G.; Cicciù, M.; Biondi, A.; Bocchieri, S.; Herford, A.S.; Laino, L.; Fiorillo, L. Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Third Molar Extraction: Systematic Review of Recent Data. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Cervino, G.; Terranova, A.; Briguglio, F.; De Stefano, R.; Famà, F.; D’Amico, C.; Amoroso, G.; Marino, S.; Gorassini, F.; Mastroieni, R.; et al. Diabetes: Oral health related quality of life and oral alterations. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 5907195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Siqueira, W.L.; Margolis, H.C.; Helmerhorst, E.J.; Mendes, F.M.; Oppenheim, F.G. Evidence of intact histatins in the in vivo acquired enamel pellicle. J. Dent. Res. 2010, 89, 626–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Siqueira, W.L.; Bakkal, M.; Xiao, Y.; Sutton, J.N.; Mendes, F.M. Quantitative proteomic analysis of the effect of fluoride on the acquired enamel pellicle. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e42204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fiorillo, L.; Cervino, G.; Laino, L.; D’Amico, C.; Mauceri, R.; Tozum, T.F.; Gaeta, M.; Cicciù, M. Porphyromonas gingivalis, Periodontal and Systemic Implications: A Systematic Review. Dent. J. 2019, 7, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. McCauley, L.K.; Tözüm, T.F.; Kozloff, K.M.; Koh-Paige, A.J.; Chen, C.; Demashkieh, M.; Cronovich, H.; Richard, V.; Keller, E.T.; Rosol, T.J.; et al. Transgenic models of metabolic bone disease: Impact of estrogen receptor deficiency on skeletal metabolism. Connect. Tissue Res. 2003, 44, 250–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. McCauley, L.K.; Tözüm, T.F.; Rosol, T.J. Estrogen receptors in skeletal metabolism: Lessons from genetically modified models of receptor function. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2002, 12, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bramanti, E.; Matacena, G.; Cecchetti, F.; Arcuri, C.; Cicciù, M. Oral health-related quality of life in partially edentulous patients before and after implant therapy: A 2-year longitudinal study. ORAL Implantol. 2013, 6, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cervino, G.; Fiorillo, L.; Monte, I.P.; De Stefano, R.; Laino, L.; Crimi, S.; Bianchi, A.; Herford, A.S.; Biondi, A.; Cicciù, M. Advances in Antiplatelet Therapy for Dentofacial Surgery Patients: Focus on Past and Present Strategies. Materials 2019, 12, 1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Cicciu, M.; Fiorillo, L.; Herford, A.S.; Crimi, S.; Bianchi, A.; D’Amico, C.; Laino, L.; Cervino, G. Bioactive Titanium Surfaces: Interactions of Eukaryotic and Prokaryotic Cells of Nano Devices Applied to Dental Practice. Biomedicines 2019, 7, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Pela, V.T.; Cassiano, L.P.S.; Ventura, T.; Souza, E.S.C.M.; Gironda, C.C.; Rios, D.; Buzalaf, M.A.R. Proteomic analysis of the acquired enamel pellicle formed on human and bovine tooth: A study using the Bauru in situ pellicle model (BISPM). J. Appl. Oral Sci. Rev. FOB 2019, 27, e20180113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Ellison, J.; Zouh, I. Vulnerability to Climate Change of Mangroves: Assessment from Cameroon, Central Africa. Biology 2012, 1, 617–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Adamson, S.; Lorimer, R.; Cobley, J.; Lloyd, R.; Babraj, J. High Intensity Training Improves Health and Physical Function in Middle Aged Adults. Biology 2014, 3, 333–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Cicciù, M.; Cervino, G.; Terranova, A.; Risitano, G.; Raffaele, M.; Cucinotta, F.; Santonocito, D.; Fiorillo, L. Prosthetic and Mechanical Parameters of the Facial Bone under the Load of Different Dental Implant Shapes: A Parametric Study. Prosthesis 2020, 1, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Cicciù, M. Prosthesis: New Technological Opportunities and Innovative Biomedical Devices. Prosthesis 2019, 1, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Lo Giudice, G.; Cutroneo, G.; Centofanti, A.; Artemisia, A.; Bramanti, E.; Militi, A.; Rizzo, G.; Favaloro, A.; Irrera, A.; Lo Giudice, R.; et al. Dentin morphology of root canal surface: A quantitative evaluation based on a scanning electronic microscopy study. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 164065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Isola, G.; Cicciu, M.; Fiorillo, L.; Matarese, G. Association Between Odontoma and Impacted Teeth. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2017, 28, 755–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Troiano, G.; Laino, L.; Cicciu, M.; Cervino, G.; Fiorillo, L.; D’Amico, C.; Zhurakivska, K.; Lo Muzio, L. Comparison of Two Routes of Administration of Dexamethasone to Reduce the Postoperative Sequelae After Third Molar Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Open Dent. J. 2018, 12, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Kunoh, T.; Nagaoka, N.; McFarlane, I.; Tamura, K.; El-Naggar, M.; Kunoh, H.; Takada, J. Dissociation and Re-Aggregation of Multicell-Ensheathed Fragments Responsible for Rapid Production of Massive Clumps of Leptothrix Sheaths. Biology 2016, 5, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Factors that influence the oral ecosystem.
Figure 1. Factors that influence the oral ecosystem.
Biology 09 00017 g001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fiorillo, L. We Do Not Eat Alone: Formation and Maturation of the Oral Microbiota. Biology 2020, 9, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9010017

AMA Style

Fiorillo L. We Do Not Eat Alone: Formation and Maturation of the Oral Microbiota. Biology. 2020; 9(1):17. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9010017

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fiorillo, Luca. 2020. "We Do Not Eat Alone: Formation and Maturation of the Oral Microbiota" Biology 9, no. 1: 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9010017

APA Style

Fiorillo, L. (2020). We Do Not Eat Alone: Formation and Maturation of the Oral Microbiota. Biology, 9(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9010017

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop