How Can China’s Autonomous Vehicle Companies Use Digital Empowerment to Improve Innovation Quality?—The Role of Digital Platform Capabilities and Boundary-Spanning Search
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Analysis and Research Hypothesis
2.1. Digital Empowerment and AV Companies’ Innovation Quality
2.2. The Mediating Role of Digital Platform Capability
2.3. The Mediating Role of Boundary-Spanning Search
2.4. The Chain-Mediating Role of Digital Platform Capability and Boundary-Spanning Search
3. Research Design
3.1. Research Method
3.2. Variables Selection
3.3. Research Samples and Data Collection
4. Results
4.1. Descriptive Statistics Results and Correlation Coefficient Matrix
4.2. Confirmatory Factor Analysis
4.3. Common Method Deviation Test
4.4. Hypothesis Testing
4.4.1. Verifying the Mediating Role of Digital Platform Capabilities
4.4.2. Verifying the Mediating Role of Boundary-Spanning Search
4.4.3. Verifying the Chain-Mediating Role of Digital Platform Capabilities and Boundary-Spanning Search
4.4.4. Bootstrap Test
4.5. Robustness Testing
4.5.1. Sub-Sample Robustness Test
4.5.2. Measurement Method Transformation Robustness Test
5. Discussion
5.1. Discussion of Methodology
5.2. Discussion of Research Results
5.2.1. Discussion of the Influence Relationship Between Digital Empowerment and Innovation Quality of AV Companies
5.2.2. Discussion of the Influence Relationship of Digital Platform Capability
5.2.3. Discussion of the Influence Relationship of Boundary-Spanning Search
5.2.4. Discussion of the Influence Relationship Between Digital Platform Capability and Boundary-Spanning Search Chain Mediation
6. Conclusions and Implications
6.1. Conclusions
6.2. Implications
6.3. Research Limitations and Future Scope
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wang, M.; Zhang, X. Research on the impact mechanism of technological change on the production process in the digital economy era. Economist 2020, 1, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barney, J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 1991, 17, 99–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Deng, Q.; Zhao, T.; Wang, Z. Research on the improvement paths of firm boundary management capability from the perspective of innovation service organization empowerment. Nankai Bus. Rev. 2023, 12, 28. [Google Scholar]
- Goldfarb, A.; Tucker, C. Digital economics. J. Econ. Lit. 2019, 57, 3–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, J.; Chen, L.; Ye, T. Can the digital economy improve the quality of enterprise innovation? A perspective based on the Neo-Schumpeterian growth theory. Sci. Technol. Progr. Policy 2023, 40, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y. Research on the Impact of Digital Empowerment on Manufacturing Industry Innovation. Master’s Thesis, Shandong University, Jinan, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Leong, C.M.L.; Pan, S.L.; Ractham, P.; Kaewkitipong, L. ICT-enabled community empowerment in crisis response: Social media in Thailand flooding 2011. J. Assoc. Inform. Syst. 2015, 16, 174–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spreitzer, G.M. Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Acad. Manag. J. 1996, 39, 483–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lenka, S.; Parida, V.; Wincent, J. Digitalization capabilities as enablers of value co-creation in servitizing firms. Psychol. Mark. 2017, 34, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.; Koh, J. Is empowerment really a new concept? Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2001, 12, 684–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, P.; Wang, Y.; Su, C. Research on the mechanism and path of big data empowering enterprise knowledge management innovation: Based on the case of Huawei’s practice. Sci. Technol. Progr. Policy 2021, 38, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.; Kunnathur, A. Strategic orientations, developmental culture, and big data capability. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 105, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nambisan, S.; Lyytinen, K.; Majchrzak, A.; Song, M. Digital innovation management. MIS Quart. 2017, 41, 223–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, R.; Mejia, C.; Kajikawa, Y. Business, innovation and digital ecosystems landscape survey and knowledge cross sharing. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2019, 147, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Xiang, Z.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, Y. Research on the value creation mechanism of advanced manufacturing enterprises under the background of digital economy—Based on the firm-customer co-evolutionary perspective. Modern. Manag. 2022, 42, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rai, A.; Constantinides, P.; Sarker, S. Next generation digital platforms: Toward human-AI hybrids. Mis Quart. 2019, 43, 3–9. [Google Scholar]
- Constantinides, P.; Henfridsson, O.; Parker, G.G. Introduction—Platforms and infrastructures in the digital age. Inform. Syst. Res. 2018, 29, 381–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, J.; Wang, H.; Zhou, D.; Jin, S. A study on value creation mechanisms of digital platform architecture and integration capability. Stud. Sci. Sci. 2022, 40, 1244–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karimi, J.; Walter, Z. The role of dynamic capabilities in responding to digital disruption: A factor-based study of the newspaper industry. J. Manag. Inform. Syst. 2015, 32, 39–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, J.; Tavalaei, M.M.; Khan, Z. Sharing economy platform firms and their resource orchestration approaches. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 136, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, L.Q.; Zheng, J. Research on the impact of digital empowerment on enterprise innovation performance—The perspective of corporate technology for social good strategy. J. Ind. Technol. Econ. 2023, 42, 23–29. [Google Scholar]
- Mikalef, P.; Pateli, A. Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 70, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cenamor, J.; Parida, V.; Wincent, J. How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 100, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newbert, S.L. Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: A conceptual-level empirical investigation of the resource-based view of the firm. Strat. Manag. J. 2008, 29, 745–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, L.; Liu, F.; Zhang, S. Knowledge search rhythm, knowledge reuse trajectories and firm innovation performance. Stud. Sci. Sci. 2020, 38, 1719–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosenkopf, L.; Nerkar, A. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strat. Manag. J. 2001, 22, 287–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F. The Impact of Cross-Border Search on Performance of New Venture. Master’s Thesis, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Zhong, Y.P.; Tang, L.R.; Li, Y. Role of digital empowerment in developing farmers’ green production by agro-tourism integration in Xichong, Sichuan. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cyert, R.M.; March, J.G. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm; Prentice Hall/Pearson Education: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1963. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Z.; Li, H.; Wang, S. Exploration on the structural dimension of digital empowerment and development of measurement scale: The case of high-end equipment manufacturing industry. J. Sci. Technol. Manag. 2022, 24, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyytinen, K.; Yoo, Y.; Boland, R.J., Jr. Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Inform. Syst. J. 2016, 26, 47–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, N.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Yu, L.E. Towards enterprise sustainable innovation process: Through boundary-spanning search and capability reconfiguration. Processes 2021, 9, 2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mäkinen, M. Digital empowerment as a process for enhancing citizens’ participation. e-Learn. Digit. Media 2006, 3, 381–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nätti, S.; Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P.; Johnston, W.J. Absorptive capacity and network orchestration in innovation communities–promoting service innovation. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2014, 29, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Y.; Chen, R.; Cheng, J. How can new-energy vehicle companies use organizational resilience to build business ecological advantages? The role of ecological niche and resource orchestration. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 415, 137765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brislin, R.W. Translation and Content Analysis of Oral and Written Materials; Allyn and Bacon: Boston, MA, USA, 1980; pp. 389–444. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, S. The Impact of Digital Transformation Strategies for Manufacturing Enterprises on Digital Innovation Performance: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study. Master’s Thesis, Shandong University, Jinan, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Gawer, A. Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Res. Policy 2014, 43, 1239–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helfat, C.E.; Raubitschek, R.S. Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Res. Policy 2018, 47, 1391–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Han, W.; Shao, Y. Digital platform capability, novelty-centered business model innovation and the growth of startups. R&D Manag. 2023, 35, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Hu, B. The effects of organizational isomorphism on innovation performance through knowledge search in industrial cluster. Chin. Manag. Stud. 2017, 11, 209–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, J.; Xu, J.; Lin, Y. Impacts of boundary-spanning search, network routines and ambidextrous competence on innovation performance. Manag. Rev. 2019, 31, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, J. Boundary-spanning search and radical innovation: The role of knowledge inertia and knowledge orchestration capability. Sci. Res. Manag. 2023, 44, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laursen, K.; Salter, A. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strat. Manag. J. 2006, 27, 131–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Zhou, F.; Xi, R. Technology research and cooperative network of China ICV industry in the post-epidemic era: The perspective of international patent. Forum Sci. Technol. China 2021, 32–45, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simeth, M.; Cincera, M. Corporate science, innovation, and firm value. Manag. Sci. 2016, 62, 1970–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, R.; Zhou, Y.; Ding, Y.; Zhou, D.; Feng, X. Enterprise innovation network: Tracing, evolution and research prospect. J. Manag. World 2021, 1, 217–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; Organ, D.W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Manag. 1986, 12, 531–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, Z.; Chang, L.; Hau, K.T.; Liu, H. Testing and application of the mediating effects. Acta Psychol. Sin. 2004, 36, 614. [Google Scholar]
- Allen, D.G.; Griffeth, R.W. Test of a mediated performance-turnover relationship highlighting the moderating roles of visibility and reward contingency. J. Appl. Psychol. 2001, 86, 1014–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, G.; Kong, W. Business model implementation and new venture performance: An integrating perspective of internal resources and external networks. Foreign Econ. Manag. 2021, 43, 68–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Lei, Y.; Chen, G. Research on process, logic and implementation mechanism of digital enabling enterprise innovation. Stud. Sci. Sci. 2022, 40, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, H.B.; Liu, H. The value co-creation in the evolution of enterprise business ecosystem: The perspective of digital enablement. Bus. Manag. J. 2018, 40, 57–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghasemaghaei, M.; Calic, G. Assessing the impact of big data on firm innovation performance: Big data is not always better data. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 108, 147–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, G.; Zeng, D.; Wei, Q.; Zhang, M.; Guo, X. Transitions of decision-making paradigms and enabled innovations in the context of big data. Manag. World 2020, 36, 95–105. [Google Scholar]
- Liang, L.; Li, Y.; Chen, S. The influence of digital intelligence empowerment on open innovation of small and medium-sized enterprises: The intermediary effect of digital intelligence dual ability and resource compositional efficiency. J. Technol. Econ. 2022, 41, 59–69. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, L.; Huang, H. Corporate digital transformation, information technology expertise of senior executives and innovation efficiency. J. Yunnan Univ. Financ. Econ. 2023, 39, 86–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Duan, Y. Digital empowerment, industrial chain integration, and total factor productivity. Bus. Manag. J. 2023, 45, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Zhou, Y.; Qiu, J.; Liu, S.; Wen, S.; Zhang, X. Construction and practice on evaluation system of industrial internet platform application for manufacturing enterprises. Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 27, 1843–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Alstyne, M.W.; Parker, G.G.; Choudary, S.P. Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 2016, 94, 54–62. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, H.; Yang, J.; Gai, J. How digital platform capability affects the innovation performance of SMEs—Evidence from China. Technol. Soc. 2023, 72, 102187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, Y.; Yao, Y.; Zan, A. The too-much-of-a-good-thing effect of digitalization capability on radical innovation: The role of knowledge accumulation and knowledge integration capability. J. Knowl. Manag. 2023, 27, 1680–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, T.; Yao, C. How does the ability of digital platforms affect organizational innovation performance in the context of sudden environmental changes? the mediating role of organizational improvisation. Sci. Sci. Manag. S.&T. 2023, 44, 95–114. [Google Scholar]
- Cao, Y.; Gu, J.; Chen, B.; He, Y. Digital innovation capabilities, boundary-spanning search, and new product development performance: Moderating role of policy perception capabilities. Forum Sci. Technol. China 2023, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, G. The impact of innovation platform empowerment on boundary-spanning search for startups: Role of improvisational capability and environmental uncertainty. Res. Econ. Manag. 2023, 44, 36–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, G.; Liu, Q. Network power and innovation performance: From the perspective of firm digital capability. Stud. Sci. Sci. 2022, 40, 1143–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, D.; Zhu, G. The Influence of boundary-spanning search on organizational ambidexterity capacity based on the perspective of innovation capability structure. Stud. Sci. Sci. 2016, 34, 1076–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, M.; Wang, J.; Zhang, X. Boundary-spanning search and sustainable competitive advantage: The mediating roles of exploratory and exploitative innovations. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 127, 290–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, L.; Zhang, H.; Li, S. Research on the impact of cross-border search on enterprise innovation performance based on the perspective of knowledge integration and strategid flexibility. Sci. Technol. Manag. Res. 2022, 42, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chesbrough, H.W. A better way to innovate. Harvard Bus. Rev. 2003, 81, 12–13. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.; Xue, Y.; Yang, J. Boundary-spanning search and firms’ green innovation: The moderating role of resource orchestration capability. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2020, 29, 361–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.N.; Hou, Y.F.; Wu, C. The balancing effect of open innovation networks in the “dual circulation” of Chinese enterprises: An investigation based on digital empowerment and organizational flexibility. J. Manag. World 2022, 2022, 194–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variables | Title | Symbols | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Independent variable | Digital empowerment | DE | We evaluate the acquisition capacities of unprecedented technology in China’s AV enterprises from three perspectives: resources, structure, and ecosystem. |
Mediating variables | Digital platform capabilities | DPC | In terms of platform integration and reconfiguration, we assess AV companies’ capacity to use digital platforms to accomplish digitally efficient operations. |
Boundary-spanning search | BS | The openness of technical innovation processes in AV businesses is investigated using two dimensions: search width and search depth. | |
Dependent variable | Innovation quality | IQ | The innovation level of China’s AV companies is measured from three aspects: R&D process, patent outcomes, and collaborative network. |
Control variables | Gender | GEN | Gender of the manager |
Age | AGE | Age of the manager | |
Education | EDU | The highest educational background of the manager | |
Tenure | TE | Length of tenure of the manager | |
Firm age | YEAR | Number of years since the establishment of the enterprise | |
Firm size | SIZE | Number of employees in the enterprise |
Variables | SEX | AGE | EDU | EU | YEAR | SIZE | DE | DPC | CS | IQ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEN | 1 | |||||||||
AGE | −0.03 | 1 | ||||||||
EDU | 0.071 | −0.024 | 1 | |||||||
TE | −0.026 | −0.026 | 0.028 | 1 | ||||||
YEAR | −0.06 | −0.025 | 0.112 ** | 0.044 | 1 | |||||
SIZE | −0.119 ** | 0.005 | 0.115 ** | −0.026 | 0.145 ** | 1 | ||||
DE | −0.038 | 0.014 | 0.272 ** | −0.054 | 0.261 ** | 0.349 ** | 0.762 | |||
DPC | −0.062 | −0.033 | 0.201 ** | −0.040 | 0.249 ** | 0.255 ** | 0.586 ** | 0.748 | ||
BS | −0.044 | −0.036 | 0.183 ** | −0.009 | 0.215 ** | 0.286 ** | 0.500 ** | 0.543 ** | 0.793 | |
IQ | −0.042 | −0.001 | 0.282 ** | −0.02 | 0.305 ** | 0.327 ** | 0.632 ** | 0.330 ** | 0.595 ** | 0.815 |
AVERAGE | 1.390 | 2.570 | 2.400 | 2.750 | 2.590 | 2.710 | 3.153 | 3.193 | 3.032 | 3.320 |
SD | 0.488 | 0.878 | 0.950 | 1.050 | 0.966 | 0.865 | 0.853 | 0.889 | 0.953 | 0.901 |
CMIN | DF | CMIN/DF | IFI | TLI | CFI | RMSEA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Four-factor model | 1967.046 | 884 | 2.225 | 0.935 | 0.930 | 0.935 | 0.042 |
Three-factor model | 2503.189 | 891 | 2.809 | 0.903 | 0.897 | 0.903 | 0.051 |
Two-factor model | 2616.816 | 893 | 2.930 | 0.896 | 0.890 | 0.896 | 0.053 |
One-factor model | 2647.332 | 894 | 2.961 | 0.895 | 0.888 | 0.894 | 0.053 |
Total Variance Interpretation | Initial Eigenvalue | Sum of Squared Loadings | Sum of Squared Loadings After Rotation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | Variance% | Cumulative% | Total | Variance% | Cumulative% | Total | Variance% | Cumulative% | |
1 | 13.406 | 31.919 | 31.919 | 13.406 | 31.919 | 31.919 | 3.766 | 8.967 | 8.967 |
2 | 2.807 | 6.684 | 38.603 | 2.807 | 6.684 | 38.603 | 3.61 | 8.595 | 17.562 |
3 | 2.375 | 5.656 | 44.259 | 2.375 | 5.656 | 44.259 | 3.25 | 7.737 | 25.299 |
4 | 2.095 | 4.989 | 49.248 | 2.095 | 4.989 | 49.248 | 3.038 | 7.232 | 32.531 |
5 | 1.775 | 4.226 | 53.474 | 1.775 | 4.226 | 53.474 | 2.822 | 6.719 | 39.25 |
6 | 1.757 | 4.184 | 57.657 | 1.757 | 4.184 | 57.657 | 2.746 | 6.538 | 45.788 |
7 | 1.536 | 3.658 | 61.316 | 1.536 | 3.658 | 61.316 | 2.705 | 6.441 | 52.229 |
8 | 1.479 | 3.521 | 64.836 | 1.479 | 3.521 | 64.836 | 2.688 | 6.4 | 58.629 |
9 | 1.352 | 3.22 | 68.056 | 1.352 | 3.22 | 68.056 | 2.683 | 6.389 | 65.018 |
10 | 1.286 | 3.061 | 71.117 | 1.286 | 3.061 | 71.117 | 2.562 | 6.1 | 71.117 |
Variables | Tolerance | VIF |
---|---|---|
EDU | 0.921 | 1.086 |
YEAR | 0.911 | 1.097 |
SIZE | 0.859 | 1.164 |
DE | 0.558 | 1.793 |
DPC | 0.568 | 1.762 |
CS | 0.642 | 1.557 |
Variables | Digital Platform Capabilities | Innovation Quality | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | M5 | M6 | |
Control variables | ||||||
EDU | 0.154 *** | 0.039 | 0.224 *** | 0.003 | 0.110 *** | 0.099 *** |
YEAR | 0.202 *** | 0.099 ** | 0.241 *** | 0.156 *** | 0.139 *** | 0.110 *** |
SIZE | 0.208 *** | 0.050 | 0.266 *** | 0.178 *** | 0.110 *** | 0.095 ** |
Independent variables | ||||||
Digital empowerment | 0.532 *** | 0.528 *** | 0.373 *** | |||
Intermediate variables | ||||||
Digital platform capabilities | 0.496 *** | 0.290 *** | ||||
R2 | 0.134 | 0.357 | 0.224 | 0.394 | 0.443 | 0.497 |
ΔR2 | 0.131 | 0.353 | 0.221 | 0.390 | 0.440 | 0.494 |
F | 35.830 | 96.068 | 66.652 | 112.46 | 137.726 | 136.732 |
ΔF | 35.830 | 239.751 | 66.652 | 1.821 | 272.587 | 74.358 |
Variables | Boundary-Spanning Search | Innovation Quality | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M7 | M8 | M3 | M9 | M5 | M10 | |
Control variables | ||||||
EDU | 0.136 *** | 0.045 | 0.224 *** | 0.158 *** | 0.110 *** | 0.095 ** |
YEAR | 0.164 *** | 0.082 * | 0.241 *** | 0.161 *** | 0.139 *** | 0.111 *** |
SIZE | 0.247 *** | 0.121 ** | 0.266 *** | 0.146 *** | 0.110 *** | 0.068 * |
Independent variables | ||||||
Digital empowerment | 0.424 *** | 0.528 *** | 0.382 *** | |||
Intermediate variables | ||||||
Boundary-spanning search | 0.490 *** | 0.343 *** | ||||
R2 | 0.131 | 0.273 | 0.224 | 0.432 | 0.443 | 0.529 |
ΔR2 | 0.127 | 0.268 | 0.221 | 0.429 | 0.44 | 0.525 |
F | 64.825 | 64.825 | 66.652 | 131.712 | 137.726 | 154.975 |
ΔF | 134.869 | 134.869 | 66.652 | 253.918 | 272.587 | 125.142 |
Variables | Innovation Quality | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
M3 | M5 | M6 | M11 | |
Control variables | ||||
EDU | 0.224 *** | 0.110 *** | 0.099 *** | 0.090 ** |
YEAR | 0.241 *** | 0.139 *** | 0.110 *** | 0.097 *** |
SIZE | 0.266 *** | 0.110 *** | 0.095 ** | 0.066 * |
Independent variables | ||||
Digital empowerment | 0.528 *** | 0.373 *** | 0.308 *** | |
Intermediate variables | ||||
Digital platform capabilities | 0.290 *** | 0.187 *** | ||
Boundary-spanning search | 0.282 *** | |||
R2 | 0.224 | 0.443 | 0.497 | 0.549 |
ΔR2 | 0.221 | 0.440 | 0.494 | 0.545 |
F | 66.652 | 137.726 | 136.732 | 139.715 |
ΔF | 66.652 | 272.587 | 74.358 | 78.223 |
Effect Path | Effect Value | Standard Error | 95% Confidence Interval | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lower Limit (LLCI) | Upper Limit (ULCI) | |||
DE→DPC→IQ | ||||
Total | 0.516 | 0.035 | 0.448 | 0.584 |
Direct | 0.370 | 0.038 | 0.297 | 0.444 |
Indirect | 0.145 | 0.021 | 0.105 | 0.188 |
DE→BS→IQ | ||||
Total | 0.516 | 0.035 | 0.448 | 0.584 |
Direct | 0.377 | 0.035 | 0.309 | 0.444 |
Indirect | 0.139 | 0.019 | 0.103 | 0.179 |
DE→DPC→BS→IQ | ||||
Total | 0.516 | 0.035 | 0.448 | 0.584 |
Direct | 0.307 | 0.036 | 0.235 | 0.378 |
Indirect | 0.052 | 0.010 | 0.035 | 0.073 |
Effect Path | n = 150 | n = 350 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Effect Value | Standard Error | Boot LLCI | Boot LLCI | Effect Value | Standard Error | Boot LLCI | Boot LLCI | |
DE→DPC→IQ | ||||||||
Total | 0.324 | 0.090 | 0.145 | 0.503 | 0.871 | 0.092 | 0.688 | 1.054 |
Direct | 0.148 | 0.059 | 0.044 | 0.277 | 0.686 | 0.102 | 0.483 | 0.889 |
Indirect | 0.137 | 0.052 | 0.041 | 0.246 | 0.185 | 0.073 | 0.066 | 0.352 |
DE→BS→IQ | ||||||||
Total | 0.324 | 0.090 | 0.145 | 0.503 | 0.871 | 0.092 | 0.688 | 1.054 |
Direct | 0.197 | 0.084 | 0.032 | 0.363 | 0.698 | 0.105 | 0.489 | 0.906 |
Indirect | 0.127 | 0.055 | 0.028 | 0.242 | 0.173 | 0.063 | 0.072 | 0.316 |
DE→DPC→BS→IQ | ||||||||
Total | 0.324 | 0.090 | 0.145 | 0.503 | 0.871 | 0.092 | 0.688 | 1.054 |
Direct | 0.166 | 0.077 | 0.028 | 0.329 | 0.621 | 0.107 | 0.408 | 0.834 |
Indirect | 0.118 | 0.050 | 0.026 | 0.224 | 0.249 | 0.091 | 0.107 | 0.467 |
Effect Path | Estimate | Lower 2.5% | Upper 2.5% |
---|---|---|---|
Direct effects | 0.381 | 0.312 | 0.451 |
Indirect effects | 0.287 | 0.232 | 0.344 |
DE→DPC→IQ | 0.127 | 0.079 | 0.176 |
DE→BC→IQ | 0.089 | 0.058 | 0.123 |
DE→DPC→BC→IQ | 0.071 | 0.050 | 0.097 |
Hypothesis | Contents of the Hypothesis | Results |
---|---|---|
H1 | Digital empowerment positively affects the innovation quality of AV companies. | support |
H2 | Digital empowerment helps AV companies improve their digital platform capability. | support |
H3 | Digital platform capability helps AV companies improve their innovation quality. | support |
H4 | Digital platform capability mediates the relationship between AV companies’ digital empowerment and innovation quality. | support |
H5 | Digital empowerment helps AV companies improve their boundary-spanning search. | support |
H6 | Boundary-spanning search helps AV companies improve their innovation quality. | support |
H7 | Boundary-spanning search mediates the relationship between AV companies’ digital empowerment and innovation quality. | support |
H8 | Digital platform capability and boundary-spanning search serve as links between digital empowerment and the innovation quality of AV companies. | support |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Li, M.; Liu, Y.; Feng, R. How Can China’s Autonomous Vehicle Companies Use Digital Empowerment to Improve Innovation Quality?—The Role of Digital Platform Capabilities and Boundary-Spanning Search. Systems 2025, 13, 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13010045
Li M, Liu Y, Feng R. How Can China’s Autonomous Vehicle Companies Use Digital Empowerment to Improve Innovation Quality?—The Role of Digital Platform Capabilities and Boundary-Spanning Search. Systems. 2025; 13(1):45. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13010045
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Mu, Yingqi Liu, and Ruiyu Feng. 2025. "How Can China’s Autonomous Vehicle Companies Use Digital Empowerment to Improve Innovation Quality?—The Role of Digital Platform Capabilities and Boundary-Spanning Search" Systems 13, no. 1: 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13010045
APA StyleLi, M., Liu, Y., & Feng, R. (2025). How Can China’s Autonomous Vehicle Companies Use Digital Empowerment to Improve Innovation Quality?—The Role of Digital Platform Capabilities and Boundary-Spanning Search. Systems, 13(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13010045