Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Known and Unknown Features of Hair Cuticle Structure: A Brief Review
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of a Phenol-Enriched Purified Extract from Olive Mill Wastewater on Skin Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Stiffness of Human Hair Correlates with the Fractions of Cortical Cell Types
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cosmetics
Volume 6
Issue 2
10.3390/cosmetics6020031
cosmetics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Degradation of Hair Surface: Importance of 18-MEA and Epicuticle

by
Shinichi Tokunaga
1,*,
Hiroto Tanamachi
1 and
Kazutaka Ishikawa
2
1
R&D—Hair Care Products Research, Kao Corporation, Tokyo 131-8501, Japan
2
R&D—Analytical Science Research, Kao Corporation, Wakayama 640-8580, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cosmetics 2019, 6(2), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics6020031
Submission received: 25 March 2019 / Revised: 22 April 2019 / Accepted: 5 May 2019 / Published: 9 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advance in Hair Science and Hair Care Technologies)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this paper, surface degradation of hair is reviewed. Surface properties such as hydrophobicity and surface friction change as surface structures of hair fiber, that is, 18-methyleicosanoic acid (18-MEA) and epicuticle, degrade. Comparison of contact angle and amount of 18-MEA from root to tip of the sampled hair fibers clarified the contribution of not only 18-MEA but also epicuticle to surface properties. It was found that chemical treatment by itself, such as bleaching, is not enough to cause complete loss of hydrophobic nature even after 18-MEA is removed. Additional weathering processes, such as repeatedly shampooing, are required. A technology for the deposition of a persistent hydrophobicity to bleached and weathered hair surfaces using 18-MEA is presented. Combination of 18-MEA with specific cationic surfactants (Stearoxypropyldimethylamine: SPDA) made the bleached and weathered hair surface hydrophobic, and its hydrophobicity was maintained even after shampooing. Characterization of adsorbed layers of 18-MEA/SPDA on a mica surface, as a possible hydrophilic surface model, was performed using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (AR-XPS). The effects of the anteiso-branch moiety of 18-MEA to create a persistent hydrophobicity with 18-MEA/SPDA were investigated using controlled AFM. It was revealed that the anteiso-branch moiety of 18-MEA in the 18-MEA/SPDA system produces a persistent hydrophobicity by providing higher fluidity to the upper region of the 18-MEA/SPDA layer. The contribution to hair beauty and sensory feeling as one of the practical functions of the hair surface is described in this paper. The hydrophobic nature of the hair surface reduces surface friction in a wet state, which reduces hair disorder alignment. It is also revealed that the moisturized or dried out feeling strongly depends on the hair shape (meandering and diameter) which depends on hair surface properties in a wet environment.

1. Introduction

Healthy and beautiful hair is desirable for many women with hair damaged by chemical treatments, heat styling and environmental factors. Various hair care products have been developed for improving hair beauty. Detailed knowledge of the surface structure and properties of hair is essential for developing unique hair care technologies. The cuticle is located on the outside of the hair fibers, protecting the cortex. It has been suggested that the outermost surface of the cuticle cells has been covered by a monolayer of covalently bound fatty acids, a major component of which is 18-methyleicosanoic acid (18-MEA) [1,2,3,4].
18-MEA is an unusual branched-chain fatty acid. It is covalently bound, possibly via thioester or ester linkage, to the cuticle surface of hair fibers [5,6,7,8]. It is known that 18-MEA creates a hydrophobic surface and acts as a boundary lubricant to reduce friction resistance between hair fibers [9,10,11,12,13,14].
18-MEA is easily removed by alkaline treatments, such as hair coloring or permanent waving, and the surface becomes hydrophilic and friction increases [13,14]. The loss of 18-MEA is considered one of the reasons for the friction increase on the surface of the cuticle. It may have an influence on the sensory perception of hair, such as the dried out feeling and being hard to comb/ run fingers through [11].
The purpose of this review article is to describe these points, mainly focusing on the degradation and recovery of the hair surface.
  • To better understand the relationship between surface properties and the amount of 18-MEA.
  • To clarify contribution of epicuticle to the surface properties such as hydrophobicity.
  • To regenerate the hydrophobic layer onto hair surface using 18-MEA and clarify the role of the anteiso-branch at the terminal of alkyl chain of 18-MEA.
  • To clarify the contribution of 18-MEA to practical aspects such as hair appearance and sensory perception.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

2.1.1. Hair Fibers

Sampled hair fibers for study of the relationship between surface properties and the amount of 18-MEA were prepared as follows. Hair fibers were kindly provided by 48 Japanese females cut at the root end. Each fiber was cut at 5cm intervals from the root end to the tip after washing. Chinese hair, Blonde hair and Brunette hair were also kindly provided by female volunteers. The number of volunteers were 19 for Chinese hair, 19 for Blonde hair, and 11 for Brunette hair. These hair fibers were treated by the same procedure as Japanese hair.
Untreated hair, bleached hair (B4 hair), and bleached and weathered hair (B4W hair) for study of the contribution of epicuticle to surface properties were prepared as follows. Hair fibers were kindly provided by Japanese females who had no experience of chemical hair treatments. Hair fibers were cut from the root end. B4 hair was prepared by four times treatment with bleaching lotion for 20 minutes. Formulation of bleaching lotion is listed in Table 1. B4W hair was prepared by 4 times bleaching treatment coupled with model weathering 360 times. 90 times model weathering was carried out between every bleaching. The procedure is described in the following article [15]. The shampoo formulation is listed in Table 2.
Untreated hair and bleached and weathered hair for study of regeneration of the hydrophobic layer onto hair surface using 18-MEA were prepared as follows. Hair fibers were kindly provided by a Japanese female. The fibers were cut at approximately 20 cm from the root end. The hair had never been treated with any chemical agents. Bleached and weathered hair was prepared as the same procedure of B4W hair.
Preparation of 18-MEA removed hair for study of contribution of 18-MEA to hair appearance was as follows. Hair fibers kindly provided by a Japanese female were treated with a solution of 0.1M potassium t-butoxide in t-butanol, for 5min at room temperature, and at a liquor:fiber ratio of 10:1. The alkali was then removed by rinsing the hair with t-butanol (2×), ethanol and, finally, by washing in water.
Hair fibers for study of hair shape and sensory perception were prepared as follows. Hair fibers were kindly provided by 19 Japanese females. The fibers were cut at a distance of approximately 15 cm from the root on the back of their head. 19 hair swatches (20–25 cm in length, 15–20 g in weight), which had experienced a variety of damage. The hair swatches were washed with a plain shampoo which formulation is written in Table 1. The wet hair swatches were then towel dried, followed by air drying without tension.

2.1.2. Mica as a Model for the Hydrophilic Surface

A fresh mica sheet was used as a model for the hydrophilic surface of bleached and weathered hair. Mica sheets of approximately 10 mm × 10 mm × 0.1 mm were cleaved on both sides immediately prior to use. They were then immersed in a conditioner solution for 1 minute at 40°C. The mica sheets were then rinsed under running distilled water for 30 seconds and naturally dried.
Procedure of conditioner treatment to mica was as follows. Mica sheets were immersed in a conditioner solution for 1 minute at 40°C. The mica sheets were then rinsed under running distilled water for 30 seconds and naturally dried.

2.1.3. Chemicals

18-methyleicosanic acid (18-MEA) and stearoxypropyldimethylamine (SPDA) were obtained by chemical synthesis [16,17]. Other chemicals were commercially available.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Amount of 18-MEA and Sulfonate Group on the Surface of Hair

Semi-quantitative analysis of 18-MEA and sulfonate group on the surface of the hair fiber were measured by a Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (TOF-SIMS) IV instrument (ION-TOF GmbH, Münster, Germany) using 25-keV Bi32+ primary ions in high-current bunched mode. The analysis area of 50 μm × 50 μm was randomly rastered by primary ions and was charge-compensated by low-energy electron flooding. The amount of 18-MEA and sulfonate group were expressed as the relative ion yield of 18-MEA versus the CN ion yield, which was derived from hair proteins [18]. In this study, the CN ion was used for normalization since the matrix of hair surface is keratinous protein and the CN ion was strongly detected in the TOF-SIMS measurement of hair samples.
Atomic concentration of S(IV), which is proportional to the amount of sulfonate group [19], was measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements (XPS) using a PHI Quantera SXM instrument (Ulvac PHI, Kanagawa, Japan) equipped with a monochromatized and focused Al Kα X-ray beam. All XPS measurements were performed using a focused X-ray source (diameter 100 µm; power 25 W) with the photoelectron pass energy of 112 eV. Charge compensation of the samples was accomplished using a dual beam charge compensation system that utilizes both an electron flood source and a low energy argon ion sputter gun. Binding energy values were corrected relative to the C1s peak at 284.8 eV.

2.2.2. Measurement of Surface Properties of Hair.

Dynamic contact angles (advancing contact angle and receding contact angle) were measured by the Wilhelmy method [20,21] using a K100MK2 tensiometer (Krüss GmbH, Hamburg, Germany). Single hair fibers were scanned over 3 mm at a velocity of 2 mm/min for the advancing mode. Dynamic contact angles were calculated from
F = π d γ cosθ
where F is the wetting force, d is the diameter of hair, γ is the surface tension of water and θ is the contact angle of the liquid versus fiber surface. The hair fiber diameter was measured on the transverse section of each fiber with a rotating fiber diameter measurement system equipped with a laser (Kato Tech Co., Kyoto, Japan) at 20°C and the relative humidity (RH) of 65%. The wetting force measurements were also performed at 20°C, 65% RH.
Elastic modulus of surface of hair fibers in wet environment were measured by atomic force microscopy (AFM) nanoindentation using Multimode NanoScope V equipped with a fluid cell (Bruker, Santa Barbra, CA, USA). Force−displacement curves were collected by force-volume mode (16 × 16 points within 3 µm × 3 µm area) using silicone probes (NCHV). The Young’s modulus of the all points was determined by curve fitting based on Hertz model.
Frictional properties of the surface of hair in the wet environment were measured using a Nanoscope III Dimension 3000 (Veeco Instruments, Santa Barbra, CA, USA). Friction force microscopy (FFM) data were acquired using unmodified silicon nitride (Si-N) cantilevers (spring constant of 0.12 Nm−1). After engagement of the tip with the cuticle surface, the tip was scanned parallel to the longitudinal axis of the fiber. To characterize frictional properties, 2 μm × 2 μm scans of the cuticle faces (without edges) were performed.
Frictional properties of the surface of hair in the dry environment were measured using a KES-SE friction tester (Kato Tech Co., Kyoto, Japan). The hair strands were mounted on a glass plate in such a way that all strands of hair were separated and parallel to each other at 5 mm intervals. The test was conducted at a temperature of 20 °C and a relative humidity of 65%.
Heat transfer characteristic (qmax) of hair was measured using a KEF-F7 Finger-robot Thermo Labo (Kato Tech Co., Kyoto, Japan) [22]. A sensor covered with silicon rubber, which has properties similar to those of human skin, was heated to 36 °C. By bringing the sensor into contact with a hair tress, heat was transferred from the temperature sensor to the hair tress. Based on the temperature changes, heat transfer speed “q” was measured, and then the peak value “qmax” was calculated.

2.2.3. Measurement of Surface Properties of Adsorbed Layer on Mica

AFM images of the adsorbed layer on the mica surfaces were obtained using a Nanoscope IIIa Multi Mode AFM (Veeco Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) with an E-Scanner. Tapping mode imaging was used to obtain topographic images of the adsorbed membrane layers. To ensure that imaging the membrane caused no damage, the tapping force was set at the lowest possible level. The nominal spring constants of cantilevers are reported by the manufacturer to be 20–100 N/m. All images presented in this work were obtained reproducibly over at least three spots on the sample surfaces. The images were acquired with a scan rate of either 0.5 or 1.0 Hz and were flattened with a first-order polynomial prior to analysis.
The mechanical properties of the adsorbed membrane were analyzed using the AFM scratching method [23,24,25,26], using a Nanoscope IIIa Multi Mode AFM. Scratching of the adsorbed membrane was performed in contact mode at a constant force and a micro fabricated tip made of silicon nitride (Si-N) and a cantilever, having a spring constant 0.38 N/m, was used. First, an image (typically, 5 μm × 5 μm) of the adsorbed membrane was acquired, then, a smaller area (typically 1 μm × 1 μm) was scanned while loading the tip hard onto the surface. Following this, the scanning was repeated over the larger area. This method is hereafter called “scratching”. Thus, if the adsorbed layer was strongly bound to the surface, it was harder to remove.
Measurements of the thicknesses of the adsorbed layers on the mica surfaces were obtained using a NanoScope V multi mode AFM (Veeco Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA, USA), equipped with an environment control cell, and the substrate temperature was controlled using a heating stage, which has been modified to be programmable. Firstly, the membrane thickness was measured at room temperature, then the temperature of the sample stage decreased at a rate of 1 °C/min to a temperature (25 °C, 15 °C, 5 °C, 0 °C, −5 °C and −10 °C), where it was maintained for at least an hour.
Molecular orientation of the 18-MEA/SPDA layer was determined by angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ARXPS) [15] which is a nondestructive method to obtain elemental and chemical-state information as a function of depth. ARXPS data was obtained using a Quantera SXM spectrometer (ULVAC PHI, Kanagawa, Japan) with a monochromatized Al Kα X-ray source at 15 kV and 25 W. Survey spectra were recorded at a takeoff angle of 45° and pass energy of 280 eV with a cylindrical-mirror analyzer. Angle resolved spectra were recorded at five takeoff angles, 70, 45, 25, 15, 10 degrees in a high energy resolution mode with pass energy of 112 eV.

3. Results

3.1. The Relationship between Surface Properties and the Amount of 18-MEA

The relationship between dynamic contact angles (advancing and receding) and the semi-quantitative amount of 18-MEA on the surface of hair measured by TOF-SIMS was investigated [18]. In addition to Japanese hair, the same measurements were carried out for Chinese hair, Blonde hair and Brunette hair. Figure 1 illustrates the relationship between dynamic contact angles (advancing and receding) and semi-quantitative amount of 18-MEA on the surface of hair measured by TOF-SIMS. Blue squares indicate the advancing contact angle and red triangles indicate the receding contact angle.
Both of the contact angles decreased as the amount of 18-MEA decreased. For Chinese, Blonde and Brunette hair the same tendency has been observed in relationship between dynamic contact angle and the amount of 18-MEA (Figure 2).

3.2. Contribution of Epicuticle to the Hair Surface Properties

The dynamic contact angles, amount of 18-MEA and sulfonate group (-SO3−) were measured for untreated hair, bleached hair (B4 hair), and bleached and weathered hair (B4W hair). The results are shown in Table 3. B4 hair has lost 18-MEA but keeps hydrophobicity. On the other hand, B4W hair has lost both 18-MEA and hydrophobicity. B4 hair had the highest amount of sulfonate groups. Surprisingly, although B4 hair samples have a higher amount of sulfonate groups compared to B4W hair samples it showed stronger hydrophobicity than B4W hair samples.
The elastic modulus of the epicuticle in a wet environment has been measured by AFM. The results are shown in Figure 3. Elastic modulus of B4 hair is almost same as that of untreated hair. B4W hair is around 80% of that of untreated hair.

3.3. Regeneration of Hydrophobic Layer onto Hair Surface Using 18-MEA

Regeneration of the hydrophobic layer onto the hair surface using 18-MEA has been studied [15]. Bleached and weathered hair was treated with 18-MEA and long-chain tertiary amine or quaternary cationic surfactant salts containing conditioners and shampooed (formulation of conditioners and shampoo is written in Table 2 and Table 4; in Table 4, lactic acid has been used to neutralize dimethylaminopropylstearamide (DAPS) or SPDA because they are tertiary amines). Results are shown in Figure 4. Surface properties such as contact angle and friction were recovered to the level of healthy hair by application of conditioner containing 18-MEA/SPDA.
AFM height images of the adsorption layer on mica after treated with conditioners are shown in Figure 5. In this figure, dark areas are mica without sorbed compounds, and bright areas indicate the existence of a sorbed layer from conditioner. Adsorption layer made by salt of 18-MEA and SPDA (18-MEA/SPDA) covered mica uniformly. Regarding the thickness of the18-MEA/SPDA layer, it was estimated to be about 1 nm.
Adsorption layer of 18-MEA/SPDA showed wear resistance. Figure 6 shows AFM height image after scratching test using a rastering a tip with constant force. The white squares indicate where 1000 nm × 1000 nm scratching tests have been done. In the image of adsorbed film treated by (b) 18-MEA/DAPS or (c) 18-MEA/stearyltrimethylammonium chloride (STAC), a square groove was observed. On the other hand, treatment by (a) 18-MEA/SPDA showed no such groove. These results indicate that the 18-MEA/SPDA conditioner adsorbed homogeneously on the mica surface and had a high wear resistance.
Figure 7 shows the temperature dependency of the adsorption layer thickness composed of 18-MEA/SPDA and n-heneicosanoic acid (n-HEA)/SPDA. The layer thickness of 18-MEA/SPDA drastically increased at a temperature around 0~10°C. On the other hand, the layer thickness of n-HEA /SPDA is more stable from the temperature range of 25°C to −10°C.
Molecular orientation of 18-MEA/SPDA layer was determined by angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ARXPS) [15]. The results are shown Figure 8. Both the peak area ratio of N(Nitrogen)/C(Carbon) from SPDA and COO(carboxyl)/C(Carbon) from 18-MEA increased with the measurement depth.

3.4. Influences of 18-MEA on Hair Appearance and Sensory Perception

The influence of the removal of 18-MEA especially in a wet state has been studied [18]. Summary of structural and physical properties of hair are listed in Table 5 and Table 6. Removal of 18-MEA and decrease in contact angle were observed. Friction forces measured using the FFM technique [11] are shown in Figure 9 Surface friction increased after removal of 18-MEA in a wet state. To the contrary there was almost no change in surface feature and physical properties inside hair fibers.
Comparison of hair tresses before and after removal of 18-MEA is shown in Figure 10. There is strong difference for the shape of hair bundles after towel drying was observed. Hair fibers with 18-MEA form fine bundles with parallel hair fiber alignment. On the other hand, hair fibers without 18-MEA form thick bundles which were disorderly. The shape of the hair bundles in a wet state influenced the appearance of hair strands after drying.
Figure 11 shows relationship between qmax and sensory test score of moisture feeling. There is a strong relationship between sensory test score and qmax.
Figure 12 shows relationship between the qmax and proportion of frizzy hair to straight hair. Appearance of hair tresses made by adding curly hair fibers to straight hair tresses are also shown. This result indicates a strong relationship between qmax and degree of order of hair alignment.

4. Discussion

4.1. The Relationship between Surface Properties and the Amount of 18-MEA

The semi-quantitative amount of 18-MEA on the outermost surface of hair and dynamic contact angles were measured. Advancing contact angle is the contact angle which is produced in the course of a wetting process. For the advancing contact angle, decrease happened in two distinct stages which is shown in Figure 13: firstly, when the semi-quantitative amount of 18-MEA decreased to zero, the advancing contact angle decreased gradually from 120° to around 100°. The correlation coefficient (R) was 0.76 and the p-value (p) was 4.0 × 10−29 (n = 149) for the slope of the line. There was significant correlation between the advancing contact angle and the semi-quantitative amount of 18-MEA. Secondly, after the semi-quantitative amount of 18-MEA reached zero, the advancing contact angle still decreased from around 100° to 70°. Surprisingly, some surfaces of hair did not become hydrophilic, even after losing of 18-MEA.
Receding contact angle is the contact angle which is produced in the course of a drying process. The receding contact angle decreased in a linear manner from 80° to 0° as the semi-quantitative amount of 18-MEA decreased to zero. The correlation coefficient (R) was 0.92 and p-value (p) was 4.0 × 10−99 (n = 237) for the slope of the regression. There was significant correlation between the receding contact angle and the semi-quantitative amount of 18-MEA. The two stages of change for the decrease in advance contact angle were observed in all ethnic groups. The relationship between surface properties and the amount of 18-MEA indicates that a decrease in 18-MEA on the cuticle surface has a stronger affect on the fibers when changing from a wet to a dry environment, compared to changing from a dry to wet environment. This result corresponds to the article which indicates that the receding contact angle is more sensitive to coverage by a hydrophobic region if its coverage is high [27].

4.2. Contribution of Epicuticle to the Hair Surface Properties

The results (Figure 1 and Figure 2) also indicate that some of the sampled hair fibers keep their hydrophobicity even in the absence of 18-MEA. Epicuticle whose outer layer is covered by fatty acid layer mainly consists of 18-MEA has been focused. The epicuticle was firstly reported as a thin membrane called Allwörden sac [28]. Several studies such as component analysis [29], microscopic observations [30], AFM analysis [31], and TOF-SIMS [32] have been conducted to reveal its structure; however, there is still no literature which indicates contribution of epicuticle to the hydrophobic nature of hair fiber.
Since 18-MEA binds covalently to the epicuticle via thioester or ester linkage, cleavage of these linkages by alkaline treatment produces cysteic acid [33]. Semi-quantitative analysis of sulfonate group was carried out by TOF-SIMS and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements. In the case of XPS, atomic concentration of S(IV), which is proportional to the amount of sulfonate group [33], was measured.
As the result, B4 hair samples had a higher amount of sulfonate groups compared to B4W hair samples it showed stronger hydrophobicity than B4W hair samples. One possible interpretation of this phenomena was derived from the data of contact angle hysteresis. Hysteresis of untreated hair and B4 hair is almost the same at around 52°, whereas that of B4W hair is around 70°. The difference in contact angle hysteresis is explained by the mobility of hydrophilic groups [34]. Hydrophilic groups on the B4W hair are thought to be more flexible than those of untreated and B4 hair.
As previously described, the hair surface maintains its hydrophobicity only after repeatedly bleaching. Decreases in the contact angle caused by chemical treatment and mechanical damage have been described previously [35]. Our results are different from previous publications, since both the kinds of chemical treatment and the hair sampling area differ. In our study, the hair sample was cut at the root end, expecting the surface structure to be intact.
To obtain further information to indicate flexibility of hydrophilic groups of B4W hair, the elastic modulus of the epicuticle in a wet environment was measured. Epicuticle is a highly cross-linked protein layer [31]. It is expected that crosslinking density would decrease with its degradation because of mechanical degradation of the protein chain [36]. A lower crosslinking density causes easier swelling when wetted. The results indicate that only chemical treatment, that is, bleaching lotion, has no influence on the elastic modulus of the epicuticle, but the combination of chemical treatment and weathering, such as repeatedly shampooing, degrades the epicuticle. Mechanical degradation of the protein chain decreases crosslinking density and causes flowing out of protein fragments, believed to be the reason for the decreasing amount of sulfonate groups in B4W hair. To illustrate these findings, a schematic illustration of the epicuticle’s degradation process is shown in Figure 14. After bleaching, most of the 18-MEA was removed, resulting in sulfonate groups. Sulfonate groups were fixed tightly inside the highly cross-linked protein layer reducing their contribution to hydrophobicity due to their low mobility. Treatment with both bleaching lotion and weathering, such as repeatedly shampooing, reduces crosslinking density of epicuticle because of mechanical degradation [36]. This makes the hydrophilic function groups flexible, greatly contributing to the hydrophobicity of the hair surface despite an overall decrease of sulfonate groups. [37].

4.3. Regeneration of Hydrophobic Layer onto Hair Surface Using 18-MEA

Surface properties such as contact angle and friction were recovered to the level of healthy hair by application of 18-MEA/SPDA containing conditioner and shampooed. One of the reasons why 18-MEA/SPDA shows persistent hydrophobicity was shown by AFM measurement on adsorption layer on mica, which is a model of damaged hair surface. To get a height image of the adsorption layer, mica, whose surface is atomically flat, has been used. 18-MEA/SPDA adsorption layer not only covered mica uniformly but also showed wear resistance, believed to contribute to persistent hydrophobicity.
The role of the anteiso-branch of 18-MEA has been studied [38] in order to clarify why 18-MEA/SPDA adsorption layer shows wear resistance. It is well known that the melting point of 18-MEA is approximately 20°C lower than that of other isomers [39]. In addition, because of the large segmental volume of the anteiso-branch structure, it was expected that the absorption layer consisting of 18-MEA will exhibit liquid-like behavior at the terminal end of the alkyl chain compare to solid-like behavior for straight chain fatty acids [4,40]. Existence of liquid-like phase on the upper side of 18-MEA/SPDA adsorption layer was demonstrated by using AFM equipped with a temperature control cell.
The layer thickness of 18-MEA/SPDA drastically increased at a temperature around 0~10 °C, which was considered to be chiefly due to the anteiso-branch chain coagulation. Layer thickness of 18-MEA/SPDA was observed lower than that of n-HEA/SPDA because of the anteiso-branch chain rotation above 5°C.
To illustrate the 18-MEA/SPDA layer, it is important to identify the molecular orientation of 18-MEA and SPDA. Results shown by ARXPS suggest that hydrophobic function groups attach to the solid surface. To comprehend the detailed structure of the stronger adsorption layer, Figure 15 shows a schematic diagram of the adsorption layer made of 18-MEA/SPDA. In this diagram, there is liquid-like phase on the upper side which is thought to contribute the wear resistance [38].

4.4. Influences of 18-MEA on Hair Appearance and Sensory Perception

One of the functions of 18-MEA on the surface of mammalian hair is to create a water repellency for maintenance of body temperature. In addition, influence on hair appearance [18] and sensory perception [22] via hair alignment were studied.
Structural and physical properties of hair before and after removing 18-MEA showed increases in surface friction and decreases in hydrophobicity. Strong difference for the shape of hair bundles in a wet state was observed before and after removal of 18-MEA. To avoid damage on hair internal structure such as cortex, anhydrous alkaline treatment has been used to remove 18-MEA from surface of hair fibers [41].
Figure 16 shows a schematic diagram of hair interaction in a wet state. In the case of hair fibers without 18-MEA, water between hair fibers spreads easily and causes hair fibers to bind together tightly, resulting in many tangles within the hair bundles. On the other hand, hair fibers with 18-MEA, water between hair fibers doesn’t spread. Therefore, hair fibers bind together less tightly. Because of low friction, hair fibers can move easily, rearrange themselves, and finally lie in ordered parallel lines.
The relationship between hair alignment and sensory perception, such as a moisturized or dried-out feeling, was studied [22]. As previously described, the existence of 18-MEA influenced hair appearance via formation of hair alignment. A moisturized or dried-out feeling perceived was explained by heat transfer characteristic, which was closely related to degree of order of hair alignment.
A schematic diagram how 18-MEA affects hair appearance is illustrated in Figure 17. Existence of 18-MEA affects surface properties such as contact angle. Surface properties affect the shape of hair bundles in wet conditions via interaction between hair fibers. Shape of hair bundles affects hair appearance and sensory perception of hair.

5. Conclusions

Surface degradation of hair was reviewed. Surface properties such as hydrophobicity and surface friction changed as surface structures of the hair fiber, that is, 18-MEA and epicuticle, degraded. Comparison of contact angle and amount of 18-MEA from root to tip of sampled hair fibers clarified contribution of not only 18-MEA but also epicuticle to the surface properties. This tendency was found for all ethnicities studied. It was found that chemical treatment by itself, such as bleaching, was not enough to cause a complete loss of hydrophobic nature, even after 18-MEA was removed. An additional weathering process, such as repeatedly shampooing, was required for complete hydrophobicity loss. After degradation of epicuticle, the hair surface turned hydrophilic. Degradation of epicuticle was accompanied by increased hysteresis of the dynamic contact angle and a decrease in elasticity in a wet state, implying cleavage of crosslinking structures.
Recovery of surface properties by using 18-MEA was also presented. 18-MEA salt with SPDA was effective for formation of a persistent adsorption layer. One of the reasons for persistency was based on liquid-like behavior around the terminal of the alkyl-chain due to rotation movement of the anteiso-branch.
Contribution to the hair beauty and sensory perception as one of the practical functions of the hair surface was studied. The hydrophobic nature of the hair surface reduced surface friction in a wet state, which reduces hair disorder alignment. Reduction of hair disorder alignment contributed to a moist feeling of hair.

6. Patents

  • Kao Corporation. Hair cleansing composition. JP-Patent 4745914, 9 August 2006.
  • Kao Corporation. Aqueous hair cosmetic composition. JP-Patent 4559392, CN-Patent 101321512, 9 August 2006.
  • Kao Corporation. Hair cosmetic composition. JP-Patent 4469874, 4469875, CN-Patent 101313884, US-Patent 8252272, 31 May 2007.
  • Kao Corporation. Hair cosmetic composition. JP-Patent 5094216, 11 December 2008.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.T. and S.T.; investigation, S.T., H.T. and K.I; writing—review and editing, S.T and K.I.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

18-MEA18-methyl eicosanoic acid
XPSX-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
SPDAStearoxypropyldimethylamine
DAPSDimethylaminopropylstearamide
STACStearyltrimethylammonium chrolide
n-HEAn-Heneicosanoic acid

References

  1. Evans, D.J.; Leeder, J.D.; Rippon, J.A.; Rivett, D.E. Separation and analysis of the surface lipids of the wool fiber. In Proceedings of the 7th International Wool Textile Research Conference I, Tokyo, Japan, 28 August–3 September 1985; pp. 135–142. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wertz, P.W.; Dowing, D.T. Integral lipids of human hair. Lipids 1988, 23, 878–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wertz, P.W.; Dowing, D.T. Integral lipids of mammalian hair. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1989, 92B, 759–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jones, L.N.; Rivett, D.E. The role of 18-methyleicosanoic acid in the structure and formation of mammalian hair fibres. Micron 1997, 28, 469–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Negri, A.P.; Cornell, H.J.; Rivett, D.E. The nature of covalently bound fatty acids in wool fibers. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1991, 42, 1285–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Negri, A.P.; Cornell, H.J.; Rivett, D.E. Effects of proceeding on the bound and free fatty acid levels in wool. Text. Res. J. 1992, 62, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Evans, D.J.; Lanczki, M. Cleaavage of integral surface lipids of wool by aminolysis. Text. Res. J. 1997, 67, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Naito, S.; Ooshika, M.; Yorimoto, N.; Kuroda, Y. The structure of bound lipids of human hair fibers and its physical properties. In Proceedings of the 9th International Wool Textile Research Conference II, Biella, Italy, 28 June–5 July 1996; pp. 367–374. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kalkbrenner, U.; Koener, H.; Hoecker, H.; Rivett, D.E. Studies on the composition of the wool cuticle. In Proceedings of the 8th International Wool Textile Research Conference I, Christchurch, New Zealand, 7–14 February 1990; pp. 398–407. [Google Scholar]
  10. Carr, C.M.; Leaver, I.H.; Hughes, A.E. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic study of the wool fiber surface. Text. Res. J. 1986, 56, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Breakspear, S.; Smith, J.R.; Luengo, G. Effect of the covalently linked fatty acid 18-MEA on the nanotribology of hair’s outermost surface. J. Struct. Biol. 2005, 149, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Torre, C.A.; Bhusham, B.; Yang, J.-Z.; Torgerson, P.M. Nanotribological effects of silicone type, silicone deposition level, and surfactant type on human hair using atomic force microscopy. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2006, 57, 37–56. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Yasuda, M. Hand combing sensation and stiffness of hair, and science of hair surface. J. Hair Sci. 2004, 95, 7–12. [Google Scholar]
  14. Tate, M.L.; Kamath, Y.K.; Ruetsch, S.B.; Weigmann, H.-D. Quantification and prevention of hair damage. J. Sci. Cosmet. Chem. 1993, 44, 347–371. [Google Scholar]
  15. Tanamachi, H.; Inoue, S.; Tanji, N.; Tsujimura, H.; Oguri, M.; Ishita, M.; Tokunaga, S.; Sazanami, F. Deposition of 18-MEA onto alkaline-color-treated weathered hair to form a persistent hydrophobicity. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2009, 60, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kao Corporation. Hair cosmetic Composition. JP-Patent 6053650, EP-Patent 0483689, 2 November 1990. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kao Corporation. Process for Production of Ether Amine. JP-Patent 4676666, EP-Patent 1219597, US-Patent 6576794, 17 December 2001. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tanamachi, H.; Tokunaga, S.; Tanji, N.; Oguri, M.; Inoue, S. 18-MEA and hair appearance. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2010, 61, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Ward, R.J.; Willis, H.A.; George, G.A.; Guise, G.B.; Denning, R.J.; Evans, D.J.; Short, R.D. Surface Analysis of Wool by X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy and Static Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry. Text. Res. J. 1993, 63, 362–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wortmann, F.J.; Wortmann, G.; Wiesche, S.E. Spatial Probing of the Properties of the Human Hair Surface Using Wilhelmy Force Profiles. Langmuir 2010, 26, 7365–7369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wiesche, E.S.; Körner, A.; Schäfer, K.; Wortmann, F.J. Prevention of hair surface aging. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2011, 62, 237–249. [Google Scholar]
  22. Tanamachi, H. Temperature as a moisture cue in haptics on hair. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2011, 33, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ton-That, C.; Shard, A.G.; Bradley, R.H. Thickness of spin-cast polymer thin films determined by angle-resolved XPS and AFM tip-scratch methods. Langmuir 2000, 16, 2281–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Devecchio, D.; Schmutz, P.; Frankel, G. A new approach for the study of chemical mechanical polishing. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 2000, 3, 90–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schmutz, P.; Frankel, G.S. Influence of dichromate ions on corrosion of pure aluminum and AA2024-T3 in NaCl solution studied by AFM scratching. J. Electronchem. Soc. 1999, 146, 4461–4472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Leblanc, P.; Frankel, G.S. A study of corrosion and pitting initiation of AA2024-T3 using atomic force microscopy. J. Electronchem. Soc. 2002, 149, B239–B247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Robert, H.D.; Johnson, R.E., Jr. Contact Angle Hysteresis. IV. Contact Angle Measurements on Heterogeneous Surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. 1965, 69, 1507–1515. [Google Scholar]
  28. Allwörden, I.K. The nature of sheep’s wool and a new research method for the chemical identification of damaged wool. Z. Angew. Chem. 1916, 29, 77–78. [Google Scholar]
  29. Holmes, A.W. A fatty acid/protein complex in human hair. Nature 1961, 189, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Swift, J.A.; Holmes, A.W. Degradation of Human Hair by Papain: Part III: Some Electron Microscope Observations. Text. Res. J. 1965, 35, 1014–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Swift, J.A.; Smith, J.R. Microscopical investigations on the epicuticle of mammalian keratin fibres. J. Microsc. 2001, 204, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Okamoto, M.; Ishikawa, K.; Tanji, N.; Aoyagi, S.; Kita, I.; Migita, C.T. Structural analysis of the outermost hair surface using TOF-SIMS with C60 depth profiling technique. e-J. Surf. Sci. Nanotechnol. 2012, 10, 234–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Okamoto, M.; Ishikawa, K.; Tanji, N.; Aoyagi, S. Investigation of the damage on the outermost hair surface using ToF-SIMS and XPS. Surf. Interface Anal. 2012, 44, 736–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Karlsson, J.O.; Gatenholm, P. Surface Mobility of Grafted Hydrogels. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 7594–7598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lodge, R.A.; Bhushan, B. Wetting properties of human hair by means of dynamic contact angle measurement. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 102, 5255–5265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Booth, C. The mechanical degradation of polymers. Polymer 1963, 4, 471–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tokunaga, S.; Tanamachi, H.; Tanji, N.; Inoue, S.; Oguri, M. 18-MEA is not the only factor contributing to the hydrophobic nature of hair surface. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference in Applied Hair Science, Princeton, NJ, USA, 15–16 September 2008. [Google Scholar]
  38. Tanamachi, H.; Inoue, S.; Tokunaga, S.; Tsujimura, H.; Tanji, N.; Oguri, M.; Habe, T. A role of the anteiso branch of 18-MEA in 18-MEA/SPDA to form a persistent hydrophobicity to alkaline-color-treated weathered hair. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2009, 60, 509–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Weikamp, A.W. The Acidic Constituents of Degras. A New Method of Structure Elucidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1945, 67, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Swift, J.A. Human hair cuticle: Biologically conspired to the owner’s advantage. J. Cosmet. Sci. 1999, 50, 23–47. [Google Scholar]
  41. Leeder, J.D.; Rippon, J.A. Changes Induced in the Properties of Wool by Specific Epicuticle Modification. Color. Technol. 1985, 101, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cosmetics 06 00031 g001 550
Figure 1. Relationship between dynamic contact angles (advancing and receding) and the semi-quantitative amount of 18-methyleicosanoic acid (18-MEA) on the surface of Japanese female hair measured by TOF-SIMS.
Figure 1. Relationship between dynamic contact angles (advancing and receding) and the semi-quantitative amount of 18-methyleicosanoic acid (18-MEA) on the surface of Japanese female hair measured by TOF-SIMS.
Cosmetics 06 00031 g001
Cosmetics 06 00031 g002 550
Figure 2. Relationship between dynamic contact angles (advancing and receding) and the semi-quantitative amount of 18-MEA on the outermost surface of (a) Chinese, (b) Blonde, and (c) Brunette female hair measured by TOF-SIMS. Same procedure as Japanese hair was adapted to analyze these hair fibers.
Figure 2. Relationship between dynamic contact angles (advancing and receding) and the semi-quantitative amount of 18-MEA on the outermost surface of (a) Chinese, (b) Blonde, and (c) Brunette female hair measured by TOF-SIMS. Same procedure as Japanese hair was adapted to analyze these hair fibers.
Cosmetics 06 00031 g002
Cosmetics 06 00031 g003 550
Figure 3. Elastic modulus measured by atomic force microscopy (AFM) nanoindentation in wet environment. Five hair fibers for untreated hair, B4 hair, and B4W hair respectively were measured.
Figure 3. Elastic modulus measured by atomic force microscopy (AFM) nanoindentation in wet environment. Five hair fibers for untreated hair, B4 hair, and B4W hair respectively were measured.
Cosmetics 06 00031 g003
Cosmetics 06 00031 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Advancing contact angle of each hair samples (N = 7 for each). (I) Untreated Hair. (II) Bleached and weathered hair. (III) Bleached and weathered hair treated with 18-MEA/SPDA containing conditioner. (IV) Bleached and weathered hair treated with conditioner containing 18-MEA/DAPS (Dimethylaminopropylstearamide). (V) Bleached and weathered hair treated with conditioner containing 18-MEA/STAC (Stearyltrimethylammonium Chrolide). (VI) Bleached and weathered hair treated with control conditioner. (b) Dynamic friction coefficient of each hair samples (N = 5 for each).
Figure 4. (a) Advancing contact angle of each hair samples (N = 7 for each). (I) Untreated Hair. (II) Bleached and weathered hair. (III) Bleached and weathered hair treated with 18-MEA/SPDA containing conditioner. (IV) Bleached and weathered hair treated with conditioner containing 18-MEA/DAPS (Dimethylaminopropylstearamide). (V) Bleached and weathered hair treated with conditioner containing 18-MEA/STAC (Stearyltrimethylammonium Chrolide). (VI) Bleached and weathered hair treated with control conditioner. (b) Dynamic friction coefficient of each hair samples (N = 5 for each).
Cosmetics 06 00031 g004
Cosmetics 06 00031 g005 550
Figure 5. AFM height image of adsoeped layer on mica surface. Dark areas are mica without sorption. Bright areas are sorped layer from conditioner. (a) 18-MEA/SPDA. (b) 18-MEA/DAPS. (c) 18-MEA/STAC.
Figure 5. AFM height image of adsoeped layer on mica surface. Dark areas are mica without sorption. Bright areas are sorped layer from conditioner. (a) 18-MEA/SPDA. (b) 18-MEA/DAPS. (c) 18-MEA/STAC.
Cosmetics 06 00031 g005
Cosmetics 06 00031 g006 550
Figure 6. AFM height image of adsoeped layer on mica surface. Dark areas are mica without sorption. Bright areas are sorped layer from conditioner. The white squares indicate where 1000 nm × 1000 nm scratching test were done. (a) 18-MEA/SPDA. (b) 18-MEA/DAPS. (c) 18-MEA/STAC.
Figure 6. AFM height image of adsoeped layer on mica surface. Dark areas are mica without sorption. Bright areas are sorped layer from conditioner. The white squares indicate where 1000 nm × 1000 nm scratching test were done. (a) 18-MEA/SPDA. (b) 18-MEA/DAPS. (c) 18-MEA/STAC.
Cosmetics 06 00031 g006
Cosmetics 06 00031 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Temperature dependency of AFM height image of adsorped layer on mica surface for 18-MEA/SPDA (■) and n-HEA/SPDA (●). The whiskers represent the standard deviations (n = 5). (b) Schematic image of observed thickness at room temperature and at cold temperature (below 0 °C).
Figure 7. (a) Temperature dependency of AFM height image of adsorped layer on mica surface for 18-MEA/SPDA (■) and n-HEA/SPDA (●). The whiskers represent the standard deviations (n = 5). (b) Schematic image of observed thickness at room temperature and at cold temperature (below 0 °C).
Cosmetics 06 00031 g007
Cosmetics 06 00031 g008 550
Figure 8. Molecular orientation analysis of 18-MEA/SPDA membrane by angle resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ARXPS). (a) Angle dependence of N(Nitrogen)/C(Carbon) concentration derived from SPDA. (b) Angle dependence of COO(carboxyl)/C(Carbon) concentration derived from 18-MEA.
Figure 8. Molecular orientation analysis of 18-MEA/SPDA membrane by angle resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ARXPS). (a) Angle dependence of N(Nitrogen)/C(Carbon) concentration derived from SPDA. (b) Angle dependence of COO(carboxyl)/C(Carbon) concentration derived from 18-MEA.
Cosmetics 06 00031 g008
Cosmetics 06 00031 g009 550
Figure 9. Friction forces of (a) untreated hair and (b) 18-MEA removed hair in wet environment (n = 5).
Figure 9. Friction forces of (a) untreated hair and (b) 18-MEA removed hair in wet environment (n = 5).
Cosmetics 06 00031 g009
Cosmetics 06 00031 g010 550
Figure 10. Shape of hair tresses in wet and dry states.
Figure 10. Shape of hair tresses in wet and dry states.
Cosmetics 06 00031 g010
Cosmetics 06 00031 g011 550
Figure 11. The relationship between the sensory test score and the qmax of hair. The correlation coefficient (R) was calculated by regression analysis.
Figure 11. The relationship between the sensory test score and the qmax of hair. The correlation coefficient (R) was calculated by regression analysis.
Cosmetics 06 00031 g011
Cosmetics 06 00031 g012 550
Figure 12. (a) Relationship between the qmax and proportion of frizzy hair to straight hair in hair swatch. The correlation coefficient (R) was calculated by regression analysis. (b) Shape of hair swatches.
Figure 12. (a) Relationship between the qmax and proportion of frizzy hair to straight hair in hair swatch. The correlation coefficient (R) was calculated by regression analysis. (b) Shape of hair swatches.
Cosmetics 06 00031 g012
Cosmetics 06 00031 g013 550
Figure 13. Explanation of two stages in hair surface degradation.
Figure 13. Explanation of two stages in hair surface degradation.
Cosmetics 06 00031 g013
Cosmetics 06 00031 g014 550
Figure 14. Schematic illustration of epicuticle’s degradation process. (a) Untreated Hair (Root part). (b) B4 hair which represents chemically damaged hair. (c) B4W hair which represents chemically damaged and weathered hair.
Figure 14. Schematic illustration of epicuticle’s degradation process. (a) Untreated Hair (Root part). (b) B4 hair which represents chemically damaged hair. (c) B4W hair which represents chemically damaged and weathered hair.
Cosmetics 06 00031 g014
Cosmetics 06 00031 g015 550
Figure 15. Schematic diagram of adsorption layer made of 18-MEA/SPDA at room temperature.
Figure 15. Schematic diagram of adsorption layer made of 18-MEA/SPDA at room temperature.
Cosmetics 06 00031 g015
Cosmetics 06 00031 g016 550
Figure 16. Schematic diagram of interactions between hair fibers in wet environment.
Figure 16. Schematic diagram of interactions between hair fibers in wet environment.
Cosmetics 06 00031 g016
Cosmetics 06 00031 g017 550
Figure 17. Schematic illustration how 18-MEA affects hair appearance and sensory pserception.
Figure 17. Schematic illustration how 18-MEA affects hair appearance and sensory pserception.
Cosmetics 06 00031 g017
Table
Table 1. Formulation of bleaching lotion (pH 9.0).
Table 1. Formulation of bleaching lotion (pH 9.0).
35% Hydrogen peroxide10 wt %
28% Ammonia Water2.7 wt %
Ammonium Bicarbonate5.6 wt %
Cetyl trimethylammmonium chloride2.0 wt %
EDTA/2Na0.5 wt %
WaterBalance
Table
Table 2. Formulation of Shampoo (pH 7).
Table 2. Formulation of Shampoo (pH 7).
Sodium polyoxyethylene lauryl ether sulfate(2.5 E.O)15 wt %
N,N-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)dodecanamide2 wt %
phosphoric acidAdjust to pH7
WaterBalance
Table
Table 3. Comparison of untreated hair, bleached hair (B4 hair) and bleached and weathered hair (B4W hair).
Table 3. Comparison of untreated hair, bleached hair (B4 hair) and bleached and weathered hair (B4W hair).
Amount of 18-MEA, Sulfonate Group and Contact AnglesUntreated Hair
(Root Part)		B4 HairB4W Hair
Amount of 18-MEA12.89 (×10−1)N.DN.D
Amount of sulfonate groupMeasured by TOF-SIMS26.70 (×10−1)1.536.10 (×10−1)
Measured by XPS30.12%0.85%0.61%
Contact AnglesAdvancing119.5° ± 3.2°92.6° ± 2.5°70.6° ± 2.2°
Receding67.6° ± 1.7°40.1° ± 4.9°0.0° ± 0.0°
1 Semi-quantitative amount of 18-MEA measured by TOF-SIMS, 2 Semi-quantitative amount of Sulfonate group measured by TOF-SIMS, 3 Atomic concentration of S(IV) measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).
Table
Table 4. Formulations of the conditioners (wt %).
Table 4. Formulations of the conditioners (wt %).
IngredientConditioner 1Conditioner 2Conditioner 3Conditioner 4 (Control)
Stearoxypropyldimethylamine (SPDA)2--2
Dimethylaminopropylstearamide (DAPS)-2--
Stearyltrimethylammonium chloride (STAC)--2-
Benzyl alcohol0.50.50.50.5
Stearyl alcohol3333
18-MEA111-
Lactic Acid0.30.3-0.6
WaterBalance
Table
Table 5. Structural and physical properties of hair before and after removing 18-MEA (N = 7).
Table 5. Structural and physical properties of hair before and after removing 18-MEA (N = 7).
Surface Feature and
Physical Properties		Untreated HairHair after Removal of 18-MEA
SEM image Cosmetics 06 00031 i001 Cosmetics 06 00031 i002
Diametric swelling ratio
in water (%)		1.08 ± 0.021.08 ± 0.15
Elastic modulus in water
(×1010 dyns/cm2)		1.77 ± 0.261.68 ± 0.53
Breaking stress in water
(×109 dyns/cm2)		1.75 ± 0.241.82 ± 0.24
Table
Table 6. Semi-quantitative amount of 18-MEA measured by TOF-SIMS and contact angles of hair.
Table 6. Semi-quantitative amount of 18-MEA measured by TOF-SIMS and contact angles of hair.
Amount of 18-MEA and Contact AnglesUntreated HairHair after Removal of 18-MEA
Amount of 18-MEA10.37 ± 0.140.00
Contact anglesAdvancing102.9° ± 4.8°88.0° ± 4.8°
Receding60.0° ± 9.0°3.2° ± 5.0°
1 Semi-quantitative amount of 18-MEA measured by TOF-SIMS.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tokunaga, S.; Tanamachi, H.; Ishikawa, K. Degradation of Hair Surface: Importance of 18-MEA and Epicuticle. Cosmetics 2019, 6, 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics6020031

AMA Style

Tokunaga S, Tanamachi H, Ishikawa K. Degradation of Hair Surface: Importance of 18-MEA and Epicuticle. Cosmetics. 2019; 6(2):31. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics6020031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tokunaga, Shinichi, Hiroto Tanamachi, and Kazutaka Ishikawa. 2019. "Degradation of Hair Surface: Importance of 18-MEA and Epicuticle" Cosmetics 6, no. 2: 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics6020031

APA Style

Tokunaga, S., Tanamachi, H., & Ishikawa, K. (2019). Degradation of Hair Surface: Importance of 18-MEA and Epicuticle. Cosmetics, 6(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics6020031

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop