Artificial Intelligence Models and Techniques Applied to COVID-19: A Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Related Work
3. Proposed Solution: Guidance and Contributions
Actions Applied to Input Variables and Results Obtained
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhou, P.; Yang, X.L.; Wang, X.G.; Hu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Si, H.R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C.L.; et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020, 579, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Walls, A.C.; Park, Y.J.; Tortorici, M.A.; Wall, A.; McGuire, A.T.; Veesler, D. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell 2020, 181, 281–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, R.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Xia, L.; Guo, Y.; Zhou, Q. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science 2020, 367, 1444–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tanigawa, Y.; Rivas, M. Initial review and analysis of COVID-19 host genetics and associated phenotypes. Preprints 2020, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Trilla, A. Un mundo, una salud: La epidemia por el nuevo coronavirus COVID-19. Med. Clín. 2020, 154, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hattaf, K.; Yousfi, N. Mathematical Modeling in Virology. In Emerging and Reemerging Viral Pathogens; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 325–339. [Google Scholar]
- Wearing, H.J.; Rohani, P.; Keeling, M.J. Appropriate models for the management of infectious diseases. PLoS Med. 2005, 2, e174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jones, K.E.; Patel, N.G.; Levy, M.A.; Storeygard, A.; Balk, D.; Gittleman, J.L.; Daszak, P. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature 2008, 451, 990–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lista, E.G.; Torres, M.S. Revisión sistemática de literatura sobre procesos de gestión de conocimiento. Rev. GTI 2014, 13, 45–67. [Google Scholar]
- Sáez, O.S. La responsabilidad patrimonial de la Administraciones Públicas en la gestión del Coronavirus. Diario La Ley 2020, 9617, 5. [Google Scholar]
- Peñas, S.L. COVID-19: Un terremoto para las cuentas públicas. Cuad. Inf. Econ. 2020, 276, 33–39. [Google Scholar]
- Moreno, O.M.C. VUCA World y lecciones de interdependencia COVID-19. GIGAPP Estud. Work. Pap. 2020, 7, 513–532. [Google Scholar]
- Berner, H.; Van Hemelryck, T. Sistemas de Información Social y Registros de Destinatarios de la Protección Social no Contributiva en América Latina: Avances y Desafíos Frente al COVID-19. 2020. Available online: https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/46452 (accessed on 19 October 2021).
- Belardo, M.B.; Herrero, M.B. La salud internacional frente al COVID-19: Entre los sistemas sanitarios y las políticas. Hamartia 2020, 7, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Mar Cornelio, O.; Gulín González, J.; Bron Fonseca, B.; Garcés Espinosa, J.V. Sistema de apoyo al diagnóstico médico de COVID-19 mediante mapa cognitivo difuso. Rev. Cuba. Salud Pública 2020, 46, e2459. [Google Scholar]
- Prieto-Castrillo, F.; Shokri Gazafroudi, A.; Prieto, J.; Corchado, J.M. An ising spin-based model to explore efficient flexibility in distributed power systems. Complexity 2018, 2018, 5905932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Casado-Vara, R.; Chamoso, P.; De la Prieta, F.; Prieto, J.; Corchado, J.M. Non-linear adaptive closed-loop control system for improved efficiency in IoT-blockchain management. Inf. Fusion 2019, 49, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casado-Vara, R.; Martin-del Rey, A.; Affes, S.; Prieto, J.; Corchado, J.M. IoT network slicing on virtual layers of homogeneous data for improved algorithm operation in smart buildings. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2020, 102, 965–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Freitas Barbosa, V.A.; Gomes, J.C.; de Santana, M.A.; Jeniffer, E.d.A.; de Souza, R.G.; de Souza, R.E.; dos Santos, W.P. Heg.IA: An intelligent system to support diagnosis of COVID-19 based on blood tests. Res. Biomed. Eng. 2021, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhiman, C.; Vishwakarma, D.K. View-invariant deep architecture for human action recognition using two-stream motion and shape temporal dynamics. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2020, 29, 3835–3844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mutasa, S. Understanding artificial intelligence based radiology studies: What is overfitting? Clin. Imaging 2020, 65, 96–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pathak, Y.; Shukla, P.K.; Tiwari, A.; Stalin, S.; Singh, S. Deep transfer learning based classification model for COVID-19 disease. IRBM 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agrebi, S.; Larbi, A. Use of artificial intelligence in infectious diseases. In Artificial Intelligence in Precision Health; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 415–438. [Google Scholar]
- Shortliffe, E.H. Computer-Based Medical Consultants: MYCIN; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Peiffer-Smadja, N.; Rawson, T.M.; Ahmad, R.; Buchard, A.; Pantelis, G.; Lescure, F.X.; Birgand, G.; Holmes, A.H. Machine learning for clinical decision support in infectious diseases: A narrative review of current applications. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019, 26, 584–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lalmuanawma, S.; Hussain, J.; Chhakchhuak, L. Applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence for COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic: A review. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2020, 139, 110059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vaishya, R.; Javaid, M.; Khan, I.H.; Haleem, A. Artificial intelligence (AI) applications for COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev. 2020, 14, 337–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ai, T.; Yang, Z.; Hou, H.; Zhan, C.; Chen, C.; Lv, W.; Tao, Q.; Sun, Z.; Xia, L. Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A report of 1014 cases. Radiology 2020, 296, E32–E40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ávila-Tomás, J.F.; Mayer-Pujadas, M.A.; Quesada-Varela, V.J. La inteligencia artificial y sus aplicaciones en medicina II: Importancia actual y aplicaciones prácticas. Atención Primaria 2021, 53, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Salado-Cid, R.; Romero, J.R. Lenguaje especıfico para el modelado de flujos de trabajo aplicados a ciencia de datos. XXI Jornadas de Ingeniería del Software y Bases de Datos 2020, 219, 227. [Google Scholar]
- Castro, J.L.A.; Villegas, O.R.T. COVID-19 y sus implicaciones sociales: Una mirada desde las ciencias computacionales. Educere 2021, 25, 147–164. [Google Scholar]
- Peris-Martínez, C.; Shaha, A.; Clarida, W.; Amelon, R.; Hernáez-Ortega, M.C.; Navea, A.; Morales-Olivas, J.; Dolz-Marco, R.; Pérez-Jordá, P.; Verbraak, F.; et al. Uso en la práctica clínica, de un método de cribado automatizado de retinopatía diabética derivable mediante un sistema de inteligencia artificial de diagnóstico. Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología 2021, 96, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ardakani, A.A.; Kanafi, A.R.; Acharya, U.R.; Khadem, N.; Mohammadi, A. Application of deep learning technique to manage COVID-19 in routine clinical practice using CT images: Results of 10 convolutional neural networks. Comput. Biol. Med. 2020, 121, 103795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozturk, T.; Talo, M.; Yildirim, E.A.; Baloglu, U.B.; Yildirim, O.; Acharya, U.R. Automated detection of COVID-19 cases using deep neural networks with X-ray images. Comput. Biol. Med. 2020, 121, 103792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, L.; Song, F.; Shi, N.; Liu, F.; Li, S.; Li, P.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, L.; et al. Combination of four clinical indicators predicts the severe/critical symptom of patients infected COVID-19. J. Clin. Virol. 2020, 128, 104431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, L.; Meng, W.; Li, J.; Tong, C.; Li, Y.; Cai, J.; Yang, Z.; Zhu, J.; et al. Rapid and accurate identification of COVID-19 infection through machine learning based on clinical available blood test results. MedRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Z.; Ge, Q.; Li, S.; Boerwinkle, E.; Jin, L.; Xiong, M. Forecasting and evaluating multiple interventions for COVID-19 worldwide. Front. Artif. Intell. 2020, 3, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chenthamarakshan, V.; Das, P.; Padhi, I.; Strobelt, H.; Lim, K.W.; Hoover, B.; Hoffman, S.C.; Mojsilovic, A. Target-specific and selective drug design for COVID-19 using deep generative models. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2004.01215. [Google Scholar]
- Linda, W. A tailored deep convolutional neural network design for detection of COVID-19 cases from chest radiography images. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2020, 20, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Tang, Z.; Zhao, W.; Xie, X.; Zhong, Z.; Shi, F.; Liu, J.; Shen, D. Severity assessment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using quantitative features from chest CT images. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2003.11988. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y.C.; Lu, P.E.; Chang, C.S. A Time-dependent SIR model for COVID-19. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2003.00122. [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro, M.H.D.M.; da Silva, R.G.; Mariani, V.C.; dos Santos Coelho, L. Short-term forecasting COVID-19 cumulative confirmed cases: Perspectives for Brazil. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2020, 135, 109853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, A.I.; Shah, J.L.; Bhat, M.M. CoroNet: A deep neural network for detection and diagnosis of COVID-19 from chest x-ray images. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2020, 196, 105581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, A.; Anjum; Gupta, S.; Katarya, R. InstaCovNet-19: A Deep learning classification model for the detection of COVID-19 patients using chest X-ray. Appl. Soft Comput. 2021, 99, 106859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbas, A.; Abdelsamea, M.M.; Gaber, M.M. Classification of COVID-19 in chest X-ray images using DeTraC deep convolutional neural network. Appl. Intell. 2021, 51, 854–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ge, Y.; Tian, T.; Huang, S.; Wan, F.; Li, J.; Li, S.; Yang, H.; Hong, L.; Wu, N.; Yuan, E.; et al. A data-driven drug repositioning framework discovered a potential therapeutic agent targeting COVID-19. Cold Spring Harb. Lab. 2020, 6, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Imran, A.; Posokhova, I.; Qureshi, H.N.; Masood, U.; Riaz, M.S.; Ali, K.; John, C.N.; Hussain, M.I.; Nabeel, M. AI4COVID-19: AI enabled preliminary diagnosis for COVID-19 from cough samples via an app. Inform. Med. Unlocked 2020, 20, 100378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahamad, M.M.; Aktar, S.; Rashed-Al-Mahfuz, M.; Uddin, S.; Liò, P.; Xu, H.; Summers, M.A.; Quinn, J.M.; Moni, M.A. A machine learning model to identify early stage symptoms of SARS-Cov-2 infected patients. Expert Syst. Appl. 2020, 160, 113661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, L.; Zhang, H.T.; Goncalves, J.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, M.; Guo, Y.; Sun, C.; Tang, X.; Jing, L.; Zhang, M.; et al. An interpretable mortality prediction model for COVID-19 patients. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2020, 2, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chimmula, V.K.R.; Zhang, L. Time series forecasting of COVID-19 transmission in Canada using LSTM networks. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2020, 135, 109864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hassantabar, S.; Ahmadi, M.; Sharifi, A. Diagnosis and detection of infected tissue of COVID-19 patients based on lung X-ray image using convolutional neural network approaches. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2020, 140, 110170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Afshar, P.; Heidarian, S.; Naderkhani, F.; Oikonomou, A.; Plataniotis, K.N.; Mohammadi, A. COVID-caps: A capsule network-based framework for identification of COVID-19 cases from x-ray images. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2020, 138, 638–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, Y.; Hou, S.; Fan, Y.; Qian, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, S.; Peng, Q.; Laparo, K. α Satellite: An AI-driven System and Benchmark Datasets for Hierarchical Community-level Risk Assessment to Help Combat COVID-19. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2003.12232. [Google Scholar]
- Trujillo, L.L.; Trujillo, P.L.; Trujillo, F.L. Modelo de Gestión del Conocimiento para la Innovación. Adm. Y Organ. 2020, 23, 69–83. [Google Scholar]
- Diekmann, O.; Heesterbeek, J.A.P. Mathematical Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases: Model Building, Analysis and Interpretation; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2000; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
- Feng, L. SEIR Model Combined with LSTM and GRU for the Trend Analysis of COVID-19; Middle Tennessee State University: Murfreesboro, TN, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
Study/Research | ML/AI Method | Data | Accuracy |
---|---|---|---|
The application of a deep learning technique to manage COVID-19 in routine clinical practice using CT images: results of 10 convolutional neural networks [33] | Deep Convolutional Neural Network ResNet-101 | Clinical; demographic | Accuracy: 99.51% Specificity: 99.02% |
The automated detection of COVID-19 cases using deep neural networks with X- ray images [34] | Convolutional Neural Network DarkCOVIDNet Architecture | Clinical, Demographic | Accuracy: 98.08% On binary classes Accuracy: 87.02% on Multi-classes |
A combination of four clinical indicators predicts the severe/critical symptom of patients infected with COVID-19 [35] | Support Vector Machine | Clinical; laboratory features; demographic | Accuracy: 77.5% Specificity: 78.4% AUROC reaches 0.99 training and 0.98 testing dataset |
Rapid and accurate identification of COVID-19 infection through machine learning based on clinical available blood test results [36] | Random Forest Algorithm | Clinical; Demographic | Accuracy: 95.95% Specificity: 96.95% |
Name | Contribution | References |
---|---|---|
Multi-Task Deep Model | A pre-trained deep learning model was utilized to train a dataset of 4895 commercially available drugs. After learning and manual refinement, 10 drugs were selected as potential COVID-19 inhibitors. | [37] |
CogMol (Controlled Generation of Molecules) | A deep generative model is proposed to find potential molecules that can blind three relevant protein structures of coronavirus. Additionally, in silico screening experiments were conducted to assess the toxicity of the generated molecules. | [38] |
COVID-Net | A deep CNN model for the classification of COVID-19 and the dataset was designed by collecting 13,975 chest X-ray images across 13,870 patients. The proposed CNN model can achieve test accuracy of 93.3% | [39] |
Random Forest Model | Using chest CT images, 63 quantitative features of COVID-19 were analyzed using an RF model. The proposed method obtained promising results, e.g., an accuracy value of 0.875 and an AUC score of 0.91. | [40] |
Time-dependent, (SIR) model | A time-dependent SIR model was proposed to dynamically adjust the control parameters according to the outbreak policies. The model was also extended to consider undetectable infected cases. | [41] |
DarkCOVIDNet | A model for automatic COVID-19 detection using raw chest X-ray images was presented. The proposed model was developed to provide accurate diagnostics for binary classification (COVID-19 vs. no findings) and multi-class classification (COVID-19 vs. no-findings vs. pneumonia). The model produced a classification accuracy of 98.08% for binary classes and 87.02% for multi-class cases. | [34] |
Support Vector Regression and Stacking-Ensemble | This model can generate accurate forecasting, achieving errors in a range of 0.87–3.51%, 1.02–5.63%, and 0.95–6.90% for one, three, and six days ahead, respectively. In all scenarios, the ranking of models, from the best to the worst regarding accuracy, is SVR, stacking ensemble learning, ARIMA, CUBIST, RIDGE, and RF models. | [42] |
Deep Convolutional Neural Network | CoroNet is a model based on Xception architecture pre-trained on an ImageNet dataset and trained end-to-end on a dataset prepared by collecting COVID-19 and other chest pneumonia X-ray images from two different publicly available databases. The model was trained and tested on the prepared dataset, and the experimental results show that the proposed model achieved an overall accuracy of 89.6%, and more importantly the precision and recall rate for COVID-19 cases were 93% and 98.2% for 4-class cases (COVID vs. bacterial pneumonia vs. viral pneumonia vs. normal). | [43] |
InstaCovNet-19 | The proposed model detects COVID-19 and pneumonia by identifying abnormalities caused by such diseases in chest X-ray images of the person infected. It achieved an accuracy of 99.08% on 3 class (COVID-19, pneumonia, normal) classification, while achieving an accuracy of 99.53% on 2 class (COVID-19, non-COVID-19) classification. | [44] |
Name | Contribution | References |
---|---|---|
Decompose, Transfer and Compose (DeTraC) | A CNN-based DeTraC framework was proposed. For the pre-trained ResNet18 model, the DeTraC achieved competitive performance, accuracy values of 95.12%, sensitivity values of 97.91%, and specificity values of 91.87%. | [45] |
Data-Driven Drug Repositioning Framework | For drug repurposing, a data-driven approach was examined over 6000 candidate drugs. The key finding was that the inhibitor CVL218 is very promising and has a safety profile in monkeys and rats. | [46] |
AI4COVID-19 | The AI4COVID-19 framework is considered the domain knowledge of medical experts. The input data are cough/sound signals, which may be recorded by smartphones. The performance is very promising. Classification accuracy of 97.91% (93.56%) is obtained for cough (COVID-19) detection | [47] |
Modified Auto- Encoder (MAE) | A modified autoencoder framework was investigated to model the transmission dynamics of COVID-19. Using the empirical data from the WHO, the model can achieve an average error of less than 2.5%. An interesting observation is that a faster intervention can significantly reduce the numbers of cases of infection and death. | [37] |
Names | Contribution | References |
---|---|---|
Machine learning algorithms. The algorithms used included decision tree, random forest, XGBoost, gradient boosting machine (GBM) and support vector machine (SVM). | A model was developed that employed supervised machine learning algorithms to identify presentation features predicting COVID-19 disease diagnoses with high accuracy. Data were collected, and it was found that the XGBoost algorithm performed with the highest accuracy (>85%) to predict and select features that correctly indicate COVID-19 status for all age groups. | [48] |
High-performance machine learning Algorithm | To support decision making and logistical planning in healthcare systems, this study leveraged a database of blood samples from 485 infected patients in the region of Wuhan, China, to identify crucial predictive biomarkers of disease mortality. For this purpose, machine learning tools selected three biomarkers that predict the mortality of individual patients more than 10 days in advance with more than 90% accuracy: lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), lymphocyte and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). | [49] |
Deep Learning using LSTM network | In this paper, the authors presented the long short-term memory (LSTM) network, a deep learning approach, to forecast the future COVID-19 cases. Based on the results of the long short-term memory (LSTM) network, the authors predicted the possible ending point of this outbreak would be around June 2020. | [50] |
Deep learning: deep neural network (DNN) on the fractal feature of images and convolutional neural network (CNN) methods with the direct use of lung images | Results classification shows that the presented CNN architecture with higher accuracy (93.2%) and sensitivity (96.1%) outperformed the DNN method with an accuracy of 83.4% and sensitivity of 86%. In the segmentation process, we presented a CNN architecture to find infected tissue in lung images. The results show that the presented method can almost detect infected regions with a high accuracy of 83.84%. This finding can also be used to monitor and control patients with regard to infected region growth. | [51] |
Deep neural network (DNN)–based diagnosis solutions, mainly based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) | COVID-CAPS achieved an accuracy of 95.7%, sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 95.8%, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97, while having a far lower number of trainable parameters in comparison to its counterparts. To potentially further improve the diagnosis capabilities of COVID-CAPS, pre-training and transfer learning were utilized based on a new dataset constructed from an external dataset of X-ray images. | [52] |
Name | Contribution | References |
---|---|---|
Method: Assistant Discrimination Tool | The method presented a robust outcome to accurately identify COVID-19 from a variety of suspected patients with similar CT information or similar symptoms, with accuracy values of 0.9795 and 0.9697 for the cross-validation set and test set, respectively. The tool also demonstrated its outstanding performance on an external validation set that was completely independent of the modeling process, with sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy values of 0.9512, 0.9697, and 0.9595, respectively. | [36] |
Pre-trained networks architecture | Ten well-known convolutional neural networks were used to distinguish COVID-19 from non-COVID-19 groups: AlexNet, VGG-16, VGG-19, SqueezeNet, GoogleNet, MobileNet-V2, ResNet-18, ResNet-50, ResNet-101, and Xception. Among all networks, the best performance was achieved by ResNet-101 and Xception. ResNet-101 could distinguish COVID-19 from non-COVID-19 cases with an AUC of 0.994 (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 99.02%; accuracy, 99.51%). Xception achieved an AUC of 0.994 (sensitivity, 98.04%; specificity, 100%; accuracy, 99.02%). | [33] |
Satellite System | An AI-driven system, namely -satellite, was proposed to estimate the risk of COVID-19 in a hierarchical manner. Data were collected from heterogeneous sources, e.g., WHO, demographic and mobility data, and social platforms. | [53] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Muñoz, L.; Villarreal, V.; Nielsen, M.; Caballero, Y.; Sittón-Candanedo, I.; Corchado, J.M. Artificial Intelligence Models and Techniques Applied to COVID-19: A Review. Electronics 2021, 10, 2901. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10232901
Muñoz L, Villarreal V, Nielsen M, Caballero Y, Sittón-Candanedo I, Corchado JM. Artificial Intelligence Models and Techniques Applied to COVID-19: A Review. Electronics. 2021; 10(23):2901. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10232901
Chicago/Turabian StyleMuñoz, Lilia, Vladimir Villarreal, Mel Nielsen, Yen Caballero, Inés Sittón-Candanedo, and Juan M. Corchado. 2021. "Artificial Intelligence Models and Techniques Applied to COVID-19: A Review" Electronics 10, no. 23: 2901. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10232901
APA StyleMuñoz, L., Villarreal, V., Nielsen, M., Caballero, Y., Sittón-Candanedo, I., & Corchado, J. M. (2021). Artificial Intelligence Models and Techniques Applied to COVID-19: A Review. Electronics, 10(23), 2901. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10232901