Next Article in Journal
A Fault Clearance and Restoration Approach for MMC-Based MTDC Grid
Previous Article in Journal
Research on Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC) Dynamic Parameter Method Based on the Sinusoidal Test Signal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Leader-Based Trajectory Following in Unstructured Environments—From Concept to Real-World Implementation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Feasible, Robust and Reliable Automation and Control for Autonomous Systems

1
CEVT (China Euro Vehicle Technology AB), Pumpgatan 1, 417 55 Gothenburg, Sweden
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA
3
Centre for Autonomous and Cyber-Physical Systems, SATM, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2022, 11(14), 2126; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11142126
Submission received: 29 June 2022 / Accepted: 4 July 2022 / Published: 7 July 2022
The global market for autonomous robotics platforms has grown rapidly due to the advent of drones, mobile robots, and driverless cars, while the mass media coverage examining the progress of robotics and autonomous systems field is widespread. There are instances in which such news may be exaggerated, and to a certain extent, surrounded by potentially misleading hype. This is understood in terms of the valuation standing of automation and robotics industries [1]. With lot of startups raising huge number of investments worldwide, and big corporations launching spin-off companies to expedite the deployment of the emerging technologies, the trajectory of this domain continues to escalate [2].
‘Deep Learning’, ‘Machine Learning’, ‘Artificial Intelligence’, ‘Data-Driven’, and ‘Neural Network’ are among the terms frequently used to discuss the rapid developments in the future robotics and autonomous systems technologies sectors. However, robotics and automation are complex fields which are not restricted to the aforementioned phrases. Autonomous systems consist of different domains such as ‘mapping’, ‘localization’, ‘object detection’, and ‘embedded systems’, as well as ‘guidance, navigation and control’, among many others. Each of these terms requires cross-disciplinary expertise and talents to facilitate innovation and further developments.
In this Special Issue, the editors aim to provide an in-depth assessment of one of the most important elements of autonomous systems, i.e., automation and control. The Special Issue is co-edited by distinguished international control system experts currently based in Sweden, the United States of America, and the United Kingdom, with contributions from reputable researchers from China, Austria, France, the United States of America, Poland, and Hungary, among many others. The main objective of this Special Issue is to highlight current research and development in the automation and control field for autonomous systems, as well as to showcase state-of-the-art control strategy approaches for the autonomous platforms. The editors believe the ten articles published within this Special Issue will be highly appealing to control-systems-related researchers in applications typified in the fields of ground, aerial, maritime vehicles, and robotics, as well as industrial audiences.
In the first article, Hernandez-Barragen et al. [3] investigated an adaptive single neuron anti-windup PID controller based on the extended Kalman filter algorithm, where the experimental tests are performed on a KUKA® Youbot® omnidirectional platform. This work demonstrated that the proposed adaptive PID controller performed better than the conventional PID and other benchmarked PID approaches.
In the article ‘Facilitating Autonomous Systems with AI-Based Fault Tolerance and Computational Resource Economy’ [4], Deliparaschos et al. proposed the facilitation of fault-tolerant capability in autonomous systems, with particular consideration of low computational complexity and system interface devices (sensor/actuator) performance. An AI-based control framework enabling low computational power fault tolerance was presented, where the efficacy of the proposed scheme was shown via rigorous analysis of several sensor fault scenarios for an electro-magnetic suspension testbed.
‘On-Line Learning and Updating Unmanned Tracked Vehicle Dynamics’ by Strawa et al. [5] proposed a method by which to estimate vehicle model parameters using a compound identification scheme utilizing an exponential forgetting recursive least square, generalized Newton–Raphson (NR), and Unscented Kalman Filter methods. The proposed identification scheme facilitates adaptive capability for the control system, improves tracking performance, and contributes to an adaptive path and trajectory planning framework, which is essential for future autonomous ground vehicle missions and traversability.
Meng et al. presented ‘High Velocity Lane Keeping Control Method Based on the Non-Smooth Finite-Time Control for Electric Vehicle Driven by Four Wheels Independently’ [6], in which two kinds of tracking error computing methods of lane keeping control for electric vehicles were proposed to tackle different conditions, and a Non-FT lane keeping controller was designed to keep the EV-DFWI running in the desired lane suffering external disturbances.
The topics of path planning and tracking algorithms were studied by Rumetshofer et al. in ‘A Generic Interface Enabling Combinations of State-of-the-Art Path Planning and Tracking Algorithms’ [7]. A generic interface design between the local path planning and path tracking systems was examined. This topic holds significant importance for autonomous driving applications.
Tran et al. [8] authored ‘Integrated Comfort-Adaptive Cruise and Semi-Active Suspension Control for an Autonomous Vehicle: An LPV Approach’, which presents an integrated linear parameter-varying (LPV) control approach of an autonomous vehicle intending to guarantee driving comfort, consisting of cruise and semi-active suspension control. Simulation-based experiments were conducted using a realistic nonlinear vehicle model validated from experimental data. The simulation results demonstrate the proposed approach’s capability to improve driving comfort (a topic that will remain important for future people-carrier autonomous vehicles).
In ‘Development and Verification of Infrastructure-Assisted Automated Driving Functions’ [9], Rudigier et al. extensively discussed the autonomous driving and ADAS applications of control systems. Their paper presents specific use cases in the said context, and the verification results for a proposed system utilizing a simulation framework are reported.
In ‘Automatically Learning Formal Models from Autonomous Driving Software’ [10], Selvaraj et al. shared their Autonomous Driving expertise and applied active learning techniques to obtain formal models of an existing (though still in development) autonomous driving software module implemented in MATLAB. This demonstrates the feasibility of automated learning for automotive industrial use. Practical challenges in applying automata learning, and possible directions for integrating automata learning into the automotive software development workflow, are also discussed in this work.
In ‘Practical Nonlinear Model Predictive Controller Design for Trajectory Tracking of Unmanned Vehicles’, Pang et al. explored the trajectory tracking issue of unmanned vehicles [11]. The authors proposed an improvement of the nonlinear model predictive controller (NMPC) for the trajectory tracking application of an unmanned vehicle (UV). The simulation results confirm that the proposed NMPC scheme reveals better control accuracy and computational efficiency than the standard MPC controller under two different prescribed roads.
Finally, in ‘Leader-Based Trajectory Following in Unstructured Environments—From Concept to Real-World Implementation’, Nestlinger et al. described the issue of guiding a vehicle by means of an external leader [12]. A system was proposed and tested in a simulation framework and then deployed in a demonstrator vehicle for validation under real operating conditions.
The editors would like to thank all the contributors to this Special Issue, which includes the authors and reviewers, as well as the Electronics publishing team. The editors believe the findings presented in this Special Issue will be beneficial for the reading of interested researchers and general audiences.

Author Contributions

U.Z.A.H., C.H. and A.Z. have contributed equally to this editorial for the Special Issue, ‘Feasible, Robust and Reliable Automation and Control for Autonomous Systems’, which is published by the journal Electronics. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The editors would like to thank all the contributors to this Special Issue, which include the authors and reviewers as well as the Electronics publishing team.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pagliarini, L.; Lund, H.H. The future of Robotics Technology. J. Robot. Netw. Artif. Life 2017, 3, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Herrmann, A.; Walter, B.; Stadler, R. Autonomous Driving: How the Driverless Revolution Will Change the World; Emerald Group Publishing: Bingley, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hernandez-Barragan, J.; Rios, J.D.; Alanis, A.Y.; Lopez-Franco, C.; Gomez-Avila, J.; Arana-Daniel, N. Adaptive Single Neuron Anti-Windup PID Controller Based on the Extended Kalman Filter Algorithm. Electronics 2020, 9, 636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Deliparaschos, K.M.; Michail, K.; Zolotas, A.C. Facilitating Autonomous Systems with AI-Based Fault Tolerance and Computational Resource Economy. Electronics 2020, 9, 788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Strawa, N.; Ignatyev, D.I.; Zolotas, A.C.; Tsourdos, A. On-Line Learning and Updating Unmanned Tracked Vehicle Dynamics. Electronics 2021, 10, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Meng, Q.; Zhao, X.; Hu, C.; Sun, Z.-Y. High Velocity Lane Keeping Control Method Based on the Non-Smooth Finite-Time Control for Electric Vehicle Driven by Four Wheels Independently. Electronics 2021, 10, 760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rumetshofer, J.; Stolz, M.; Watzenig, D. A Generic Interface Enabling Combinations of State-of-the-Art Path Planning and Tracking Algorithms. Electronics 2021, 10, 788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tran, G.; Pham, T.-P.; Sename, O.; Costa, E.; Gaspar, P. Integrated Comfort-Adaptive Cruise and Semi-Active Suspension Control for an Autonomous Vehicle: An LPV Approach. Electronics 2021, 10, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rudigier, M.; Nestlinger, G.; Tong, K.; Solmaz, S. Development and Verification of Infrastructure-Assisted Automated Driving Functions. Electronics 2021, 10, 2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Selvaraj, Y.; Farooqui, A.; Panahandeh, G.; Ahrendt, W.; Fabian, M. Automatically Learning Formal Models from Autonomous Driving Software. Electronics 2022, 11, 643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pang, H.; Liu, M.; Hu, C.; Liu, N. Practical Nonlinear Model Predictive Controller Design for Trajectory Tracking of Unmanned Vehicles. Electronics 2022, 11, 1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nestlinger, G.; Rumetshofer, J.; Solmaz, S. Leader-Based Trajectory Following in Unstructured Environments—From Concept to Real-World Implementation. Electronics 2022, 11, 1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hamid, U.Z.A.; Hu, C.; Zolotas, A. Feasible, Robust and Reliable Automation and Control for Autonomous Systems. Electronics 2022, 11, 2126. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11142126

AMA Style

Hamid UZA, Hu C, Zolotas A. Feasible, Robust and Reliable Automation and Control for Autonomous Systems. Electronics. 2022; 11(14):2126. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11142126

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hamid, Umar Zakir Abdul, Chuan Hu, and Argyrios Zolotas. 2022. "Feasible, Robust and Reliable Automation and Control for Autonomous Systems" Electronics 11, no. 14: 2126. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11142126

APA Style

Hamid, U. Z. A., Hu, C., & Zolotas, A. (2022). Feasible, Robust and Reliable Automation and Control for Autonomous Systems. Electronics, 11(14), 2126. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11142126

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop