Penetration Estimation in SEM, EDAX Dental Imaging Systems for Desensitization Application
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Dataset
2.2. Iontophoresis Method for Treatment in Dentistry
2.3. Ionic Gel Application
2.4. SEM Analysis
2.5. EDAX Analysis
3. Implementation of the Proposed Prototype
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Phase 1—SEM Test Results
4.1.1. Tooth Samples before Iontophoric Application
4.1.2. SEM Images with Only Ionic Gel
4.1.3. SEM Images with Ionic Gel and Iontophoric Application
4.2. Phase 2—EDAX Test Results
4.2.1. EDAX Results for KNO3 Ionic Gel
4.2.2. EDAX Results for Lidocaine
4.2.3. EDAX Results for Varnish
4.2.4. EDAX Results for Strontium Chloride
4.2.5. Comparative Analysis of the Gels Applied
- The presence of potassium (K) was 0.05 in the samples where a potassium nitrate based ionic gel was applied with a 0.5 mA current for 5 min by the iontophoric method. This proves that nearly 60% of the K ions were traced after iontophoresis in a short time.
- The presence of sodium ions was 0.87 for the tooth sample treated by iontophoresis, which were not traced for the control group samples with lidocaine. During the iontophoresis method, the Na ion used is exited, which is traced. Thus, Na can be used for tooth desensitization.
- For the varnish samples, the presence of sodium (Na) ions was 0.67 for the control group and 0.61 for the samples treated by iontophoresis (i.e., 75% of the ions were present in the tooth after the above method).
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- History of Anesthesia Society. Available online: http://www.histansoc.org.uk/timeline.html (accessed on 20 February 2021).
- Universitat Leiden. Available online: http://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/research/research (accessed on 20 February 2021).
- Angelo, Z.; Charalambous, P. Alternative practices of achieving anaesthesia fordental procedures: A review. Dent. Anaesth. Pain. Med. 2018, 18, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hironori, T. Dental anesthesia in the presence of inflammation: Pharmacological mechanisms for the reduced efficacy of local anesthetics. Int. J. Clin. Anesthesiol. 2016, 4, 1059. [Google Scholar]
- Krishnaprasad Shetty, S.S.V.; Kilaru, K.R.; Azeez, F.A.; Patil, S.; gouda Sangam, B.; Luke, A.M.; Prithviraj, D.R.; Saraswat, S.; Sounderraj, K.; Patel, A. Comparative evaluation of efficacy of commercially available desensitizing toothpastes (Shy-Nm and Thermoseal Ra) with 0.33% acidulated NaF gel used with and without iontophoresis in patients with dentinal hypersensitivity. J. Appl. Dent. Med. Sci. 2017, 3, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.; Kwon, K.; Kim, M.; Min, J.; Hwang, N.S.; Kim, W. Transdermal iontophoresis patch with reverse electrodialysis. Drug Deliv. 2017, 24, 701–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Subramaniam, S.; Neelakantan, P. Local anesthesia in dentistry-Clinical considerations. Int. J. Drug Dev. Res 2013, 5, 30–36. [Google Scholar]
- Bubteina, N.; Garoushi, S. Dentine Hypersensitivity: A Review. Dentistry 2015, 5, 9. [Google Scholar]
- Ita, K. Transdermal Delivery of Drugs with Microneedles—Potential and Challenges. Pharmaceutics 2015, 7, 90–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sharma, S.; Parvez, N.; Sharma, P.K. Iontophoresis-Models and applications: A review. Afr. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2015, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Tuttlenumbnow. Available online: https://tuttlenumbnow.com/ (accessed on 5 September 2022).
- Zaid Alkilani, A.; McCrudden, M.T.; Donnelly, R.F. Transdermal Drug Delivery:Innovative Pharmaceutical Developments Based on Disruption of the Barrier Properties of the stratum corneum. Pharmaceutics 2015, 7, 438–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wanasathop, A.; Li, S.K. Iontophoretic Drug Delivery in the Oral Cavity. Pharmaceutics 2018, 10, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tan, G.Z.; Orndorff, P.E. The ion delivery manner influences the antimicrobial efficacy of silver oligodynamic iontophoresis. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 2019, 39, 622–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, Y.; Yang, J.; Zheng, Y.; Ye, R.; Liu, B.; Huang, Y.; Zhou, W.; Jiang, L. Iontophoresis–driven porous microneedle array patch for active transdermal drug delivery. Acta Biomaterilia 2021, 121, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, T. Transdermal drug delivery by iontophoresis: Mechanistic aspects. Innov. Pharm. Pharmacother. 2018, 6, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bozkurt, M.H.; Karagol, S. Jaw and Teeth Segmentation on the Panoramic X-Ray Images for Dental Human Identification. J. Digit. Imaging 2020, 33, 1410–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Gao, F.; Zhao, S.; Yang, F.; Song, L. A Fast Automatic Reconstruction Method for Panoramic Images Based on Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Electronics 2022, 11, 2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dao-Ngoc, L.; Liu, C.; Du, Y. A Segmentation Enhancement Method for the Low-Contrast and Narrow-Banded Substances in CBCT Images. Electronics 2020, 9, 974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moratin, J.; Berger, M.; Rückschloss, T.; Metzger, K.; Berger, H.; Gottsauner, M.; Head motion Engel, M.; Hoffmann, J.; Freudisperger, C.; Ristow, O. Head motion during cone-beam computed tomography: Analysis of frequency and influence on image quality. Imaging Sci. Dent. 2020, 50, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Canjau, S.; Todea, C. Minimally-invasive diagnostic approaches in periodontics: Laser Doppler imaging and optical coherence tomography. Clin. Dent. 2021, 5, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hegde, S.; Mankude, S.; Kashyap, R.; Kumar, A. Comparative assessment of efficacy of iontophoresis with acidulated phosphate fluoride gel and a commercially available desensitizing agent-bifluoride varnish in the treatment of hypersensitive teeth. IOSR J. Dent. Med. Sci. 2015, 14, 34–41. [Google Scholar]
- Stember, J.N.; Moonis, G.; Silva, C. Panoramic Dental Reconstruction for Faster Detection of Dental Pathology on Medical Non-dental CT Scans: A Proof of Concept from CT Neck Soft Tissue. J. Digit. Imaging 2021, 34, 959–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Villoria, E.M.; Rodrigues, R.C.; Peraira, C.H.M.; Conceicao, G.S.A. The importance of digital radiographic systems in dental schools and oral radiology centers as part of reopening during the COVID-19 pandemic. Imaging Sci. Dent. 2021, 51, 91–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vernon, J.A.; Kaufman, M.R.; Brummett, R.E.; Bender, H.G. Iontophoresis Apparatus for Applying Local Anesthetics. U.S. Patent No.US3991755A, January 1975. [Google Scholar]
- Cubayachi, C.; do Couto, R.O.; de Gaitani, C.M.; Pedrazzi, V.; de Freitas, O.; Lopez, R.F.V. Needle-free buccal anesthesia using iontophoresis and amino amide salts combined in a mucoadhesive formulation. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2015, 136, 1193–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paterson, A.; Franco, V.; Patel, S.; Foschi, F. Use of preoperative cone-beam computed tomography to aid in establishment of endodontic working length: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Imaging Sci. Dent. 2020, 50, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sl. No. | Nature of the Sample | Sample Type | No. of Samples |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Pure teeth | Control group | 1 |
2 | Tooth with varnish | Control group | 1 |
0.3 mA for 5 min | 4 | ||
0.5 mA for 3 min | 3 | ||
3 | Tooth with KNO3 | Control group | 1 |
0.3 mA for 5 min | 4 | ||
0.5 mA for 3 min | 3 | ||
4 | Tooth with lidocaine | Control group | 1 |
0.3 mA for 3 min | 4 | ||
0.5 mA for 5 min | 4 | ||
5 | Tooth with strontium chloride | 0.3 mA for 5 min | 4 |
0.5 mA for 5 min | 4 |
Element | O (wt.%) | Na (wt.%) | Mg (wt.%) | P (wt.%) | K (wt.%) | Ca (wt.%) | Ci (wt.%) | Sr (wt.%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tooth sample—KNO3 with iontophoresis (0.5 mA for 5 min) | 57.52 | - | 1.04 | 13.96 | 0.09 | 27.39 | - | - |
Control group with KNO3 | 51.98 | 0.76 | 0.95 | 14.67 | 0.17 | 31.47 | - | - |
Control group with lidocaine | 54.62 | - | 1.31 | 14.63 | 29.43 | - | - | - |
Tooth sample—lidocaine with iontophoresis (0.5 mA for 5 min) | 51.18 | 0.91 | 1.07 | 13.97 | 32.86 | - | - | - |
Control group with varnish | 52.80 | 0.71 | 0.85 | 13.58 | 32.06 | - | - | - |
Tooth sample—varnish with iontophoresis (0.5 mA for 5 min) | 49.87 | 0.63 | 0.82 | 15.02 | 33.65 | - | - | - |
Tooth sample—strontium chloride with iontophoresis | 53.63 | 0.65 | 1.19 | 14.35 | - | 29.61 | 0.12 | 0.44 |
Element | Penetration Level |
---|---|
Tooth sample—varnish with iontophoresis (0.5 mA for 5 min) | 75% of ions traced after iontophoresis in a short time. |
Tooth sample—KNO3 with iontophoresis | 60% of ions traced after iontophoresis in a short time. |
Tooth sample—lidocaine with iontophoresis (0.5 mA for 5 min) | 87% of ions traced after iontophoresis in a short time. |
Tooth sample—strontium chloride with iontophoresis | 70% of ions traced after iontophoresis in a short time. |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Michael, P.A.; Dharmaraj, P.; Meenal, R.; Josh, F.T.; Joseph, J.J.; Nigel, K.G.J.; Hemanth, J. Penetration Estimation in SEM, EDAX Dental Imaging Systems for Desensitization Application. Electronics 2022, 11, 3234. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11193234
Michael PA, Dharmaraj P, Meenal R, Josh FT, Joseph JJ, Nigel KGJ, Hemanth J. Penetration Estimation in SEM, EDAX Dental Imaging Systems for Desensitization Application. Electronics. 2022; 11(19):3234. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11193234
Chicago/Turabian StyleMichael, Prawin Angel, Pamela Dharmaraj, Rajasekaran Meenal, Francisxavier Thomas Josh, Jeyaraj Jency Joseph, Kulandaisamy Gerard Joe Nigel, and Jude Hemanth. 2022. "Penetration Estimation in SEM, EDAX Dental Imaging Systems for Desensitization Application" Electronics 11, no. 19: 3234. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11193234
APA StyleMichael, P. A., Dharmaraj, P., Meenal, R., Josh, F. T., Joseph, J. J., Nigel, K. G. J., & Hemanth, J. (2022). Penetration Estimation in SEM, EDAX Dental Imaging Systems for Desensitization Application. Electronics, 11(19), 3234. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11193234