Fuzzy Controller in the Products Collecting System of the Jig for Minerals Beneficiation

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please refer the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

We greatly appreciate your thoughtful comments that helped improve the manuscript. We trust that all of your comments have been addressed accordingly in a revised manuscript. All answers we send in attachment in docx file.

Sincerelly

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript discusses a timely topic. However, in its present form, it is not suitable for publication. The authors are invited to address the following comments/suggestions.

1. The “Introduction” section is written in a very much confusing way. The “Introduction” section should consist of five sections, respectively describing “the context of research,” “literature review,” “research gaps,” “authors’ contribution,” and “chapter organization.” The contribution part should reflect how each identified research gap is addressed. Further, use a research flow diagram to portray the main contributions better. This creates interest in reading the paper. 
2. Clearly highlight the manuscript’s contributions pointwise. 
3. At various places, the sentences are reading odd. It is difficult to infer a more precise meaning. This might have happened while making changes to avoid plagiarism. The flow should not be disturbed. A complete recheck is required. Further, try to improve the English in the manuscript. The reviewer would like to see where all the corrections are made. 
4. X-axis and y-axis definitions for Fig. 11 and Fig. 12 are not included. Make necessary corrections.
5. “e” used in equations 12 and 13 are represented differently. Check the entire manuscript to ensure consistency of use of variables and symbols. Further, ensure that all symbols used in equations are defined inside the text.
6. All Fig numbers, Table numbers and equation numbers must be cited inside the text.
7. Elaborate the findings from Tables and Figures more comprehensively.
8. The conclusion section must contain first a summary paragraph, followed by specific points enlisting the manuscript’s major findings (through numerical quantification).

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

We greatly appreciate your thoughtful comments that helped improve the manuscript. We trust that all of your comments have been addressed accordingly in a revised manuscript. All answera are in attachment docx file

Sincerelly

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors alreaday revised the manuscript acccording to the reviewer's comments. I consider it is suitable for going to publication.

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript is okay. May be considered for publication.