Sixth-Generation (6G) Networks for Improved Machine-to-Machine (M2M) Communication in Industry 4.0
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results of the Review
3.1. The 6G-Based Revolution of Industry 4.0/5.0
- Ultra-reliable low-latency communications (URLLC): 6G networks are expected to provide ultra-reliable low-latency communications, which are crucial for real-time M2M interactions in industrial settings. This means machines can communicate with each other with minimal latency and high reliability, allowing users to respond quickly to changing conditions on the factory floor.
- Massive machine-type communication (mMTC): With 6G networks, the ability to connect a huge number of devices simultaneously is expected to improve significantly. This capability is essential to support the wide range of sensors, actuators and other devices found in modern industrial environments. mMTC facilitates seamless communication between these devices, enabling efficient coordination and automation.
- High-bandwidth transmission: Industry 4.0 applications often involve the transmission of large amounts of data, such as high-resolution sensor data, video streams, and virtual reality (VR) environments. Sixth generation networks are expected to support significantly higher data rates than previous generations, facilitating the smooth transmission of bandwidth-intensive data in real time. This enables advanced analytics, remote monitoring, and predictive maintenance in industrial systems.
- Sixth-generation networks are expected to introduce network slicing capabilities, enabling the creation of virtualized, dedicated network slices tailored to specific industrial applications. This enables enterprises to tailor network resources to their requirements, ensuring optimal performance, security, and reliability of M2M communications across a variety of Industry 4.0 use cases.
- Integration with edge computing, which is increasingly used in Industry 4.0, to process data closer to the source, reducing latency and bandwidth utilization. Sixth-generation networks will likely integrate seamlessly with edge computing infrastructure, enabling distributed M2M data processing and analysis at the edge. This facilitates real-time decision-making and enables rapid responses to a dynamic industrial environment.
- Improved security and privacy: As cyber threats evolve, ensuring the security and privacy of M2M communications in Industry 4.0 is of paramount importance. Sixth-generation networks are expected to include advanced security features such as robust encryption, authentication mechanisms, and intrusion detection systems to protect M2M communications from unauthorized access and cyber attacks.
3.2. Transition from 5G to 6G
- THz communications;
- Holographic beamforming;
- Cell-free MIMO,
- AI/machine learning (ML);
- Blockchain;
- Quantum communications;
- Enhanced edge computing;
- Intelligent reflecting surface;
- New multiple access techniques;
- Zero energy interface [3].
3.3. Target M2M Communication in 6G Networks
- In the physical layer: 6G-authentication and key agreement (AKA) protocol, physical layer authentication, novel user subscription models (eSIM), and novel authentication protocols for non-third generation partnership project (3GPP) networks.
- In the connection layer: end-to-end security services and policies and user security using biological characteristics of individuals.
- In the application layer: novel security applications and novel privacy schemes [4].
- Authentication attacks;
- Access control attack;
- Jamming attacks;
- Data modification attack;
- Eavesdropping attacks [4].
- Smart factories;
- Smart homes;
- Smart cars;
- Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs);
- Smartphones, smartwatches, and smartbands;
- Wearable devices;
- Broadband access [6].
3.4. Key Issues to Be Addressed
4. Discussion
- Understanding 6G technology: 6G is the next generation of wireless communication technology, and is expected to offer significantly faster speeds, lower latency, and powerful device connectivity compared with 5G. Understanding the capabilities and potential applications of 6G technology is crucial to harnessing its benefits in factory automation.
- Use case identification: Identify specific use cases in the factory environment where M2M communication can streamline processes, improve productivity, and reduce operational costs. Examples include predictive maintenance, real-time monitoring, autonomous robotics, and supply chain optimization.
- Network infrastructure: Develop a robust and scalable network infrastructure capable of supporting high-bandwidth, low-latency M2M communications requirements in factory settings. This may include deploying 6G-enabled base stations, edge computing resources, and network slicing technologies to prioritize critical factory applications.
- Sensor placement: Place various sensors throughout the factory floor to collect real-time data on machine performance, environmental conditions, energy consumption, and other relevant parameters. These sensors should be able to wirelessly transmit data to centralized control systems for analysis and decision-making.
- Edge computing: Deploy edge computing capabilities at the edge to process and analyze data locally, reducing latency and minimizing dependency on centralized cloud infrastructure. Edge computing enables real-time decision-making and increases the responsiveness of M2M systems in dynamic factory environments.
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning: Leverage AI and ML algorithms to analyze sensor data, identify patterns, predict equipment failures, optimize production schedules, and improve overall operational efficiency. These AI/ML models can be deployed at the edge or in the cloud, depending on latency and resource requirements.
- Security and privacy: Implement robust security measures to protect sensitive data and prevent unauthorized access to M2M systems. This includes encryption, authentication, access controls, and regular security audits to identify and mitigate potential security vulnerabilities.
- Interoperability and standards: Ensure interoperability between various devices, protocols, and systems in the factory ecosystem by adhering to industry standards and protocols. This facilitates seamless communication and integration between various M2M infrastructure components.
- Scalability and flexibility: Design the M2M factory infrastructure to be scalable and flexible, enabling easy expansion, reconfiguration, and adaptation to changing production requirements and technological advances.
- Testing and optimization: Thoroughly test and optimize the M2M factory system to ensure reliability, performance, and compatibility with existing processes and workflows. Continuously monitor and tune the system based on feedback and performance metrics.
4.1. Limitations of Current Studies
- Ethical and social implications: Explore the ethical, social, and regulatory implications of 6G deployment, taking into account factors such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, job displacement, and the digital divide, and develop a framework for responsible deployment and governance.
- Needs for cross-disciplinary collaboration: Supporting cross-disciplinary collaboration between researchers, engineers, policymakers, and industry stakeholders to address multi-faceted challenges, leveraging knowledge from fields such as telecommunications, computer science, electrical engineering, industrial engineering, and science communities.
4.2. Directions for Further Research
- Spectrum management and allocation: Explore novel spectrum management techniques and principles to optimize spectrum utilization in 6G M2M communications, considering factors such as frequency allocation, dynamic spectrum access, and interference mitigation in industrial environments.
- Propagation modeling and channel characterization: Develop accurate propagation models and channel characterization techniques tailored to 6G frequencies, including THz bands, to better understand propagation characteristics and channel behavior in industrial settings. This research can help design efficient antenna systems and deployment strategies for reliable M2M communications.
- Design energy-efficient network protocols and algorithms specifically optimized for 6G M2M communications, aimed at minimizing power consumption in battery-powered devices and IoT sensors deployed in industrial environments, while ensuring reliable, low-latency communications.
- Edge computing integration and optimization: Learn advanced edge computing architectures and optimization techniques to seamlessly integrate edge computing capabilities into 6G networks, enabling distributed computing, real-time analytics, and intelligent decision-making at the edge for M2M communications in Industry 4.0.
- Security and privacy: Develop robust security mechanisms, encryption techniques, and privacy-preserving protocols to address the unique security challenges of 6G M2M communications, including protection against cyber threats, data breaches, and unauthorized access in industrial IoT deployments.
- Standardization and interoperability: Contribute to 6G standardization efforts, focusing on defining interoperable protocols, interfaces, and data formats to ensure seamless integration and interoperability between heterogeneous devices and systems in Industry 4.0 ecosystems.
- Real-world implementation studies and use cases: Conduct empirical research and field trials to evaluate the performance, reliability, and scalability of 6G M2M communications in real-world industrial environments, identifying practical challenges and opportunities for optimization and improvement.
- Human–machine interaction and collaboration: Explore the role of 6G in enabling advanced human–machine interaction and collaboration paradigms, such as augmented reality (AR), VR, and teleoperation, to enhance productivity, safety, and efficiency in workflow within Industry 4.0 [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40].
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Khan, N.A.; Schmid, S. AI-RAN in 6G Networks: State-of-the-Art and Challenges. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2024, 5, 294–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puspitasari, A.A.; An, T.T.; Alsharif, M.H.; Lee, B.M. Emerging Technologies for 6G Communication Networks: Machine Learning Approaches. Sensors 2023, 23, 7709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, X.; Rommer, S.; Euler, S.; Yavuz, E.; Karlsson, R. 5G from space: An overview of 3GPP non-terrestrial networks. IEEE Commun. Stand. Mag. 2021, 4, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdel Hakeem, S.A.; Hussein, H.H.; Kim, H. Security Requirements and Challenges of 6G Technologies and Applications. Sensors 2022, 22, 1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tataria, H.; Shafi, M.; Molisch, A.F.; Dohler, M.; Sjoland, H.; Tufvesson, F. 6G wireless systems: Vision, requirements, challenges, insights, and opportunities. Proc. IEEE 2021, 7, 1166–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, X.; Grovlen, A.; Werner, K.; Li, J.; Baldemair, R.; Cheng, J.-F.T.; Parkvall, S.; Larsson, D.C.; Koorapaty, H.; Frenne, M.; et al. 5G new radio: Unveiling the essentials of the next generation wireless access technology. IEEE Commun. Stand. Mag. 2019, 3, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plastras, S.; Tsoumatidis, D.; Skoutas, D.N.; Rouskas, A.; Kormentzas, G.; Skianis, C. Non-Terrestrial Networks for Energy-Efficient Connectivity of Remote IoT Devices in the 6G Era: A Survey. Sensors 2024, 24, 1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Björnson, E.; Sanguinetti, L.; Wymeersch, H.; Hoydis, J.; Marzetta, T.L. Massive MIMO is a reality—What is next?: Five promising research directions for antenna arrays. Digit. Signal Process. 2019, 94, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Chen, S.; Lin, Y.; Zheng, J.; Ai, B.; Hanzo, L. Cell-free massive MIMO: A new next-generation paradigm. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 99878–99888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohsan, S.A.H.; Sadiq, M.; Li, Y.; Shvetsov, A.V.; Shvetsova, S.V.; Shafiq, M. NOMA-Based VLC Systems: A Comprehensive Review. Sensors 2023, 23, 2960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boroujeni, S.R.; Mazaheri, M.H.; Ituah, S.; Wyrzykowska, A.; Ziabakhsh, S.; Palizban, A.; Chen, G.; El-Gouhary, A.; Fereidani, K.; Nezhad-Ahmadi, M.-R.; et al. A high-efficiency 27–30-GHz 130-nm Bi-CMOS transmitter front end for SATCOM phased arrays. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2021, 11, 4977–4985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akyildiz, I.F.; Kak, A.; Nie, S. 6G and beyond: The future of wireless communications systems. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 133995–134030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J.; Zhong, C.; Li, G.Y.; Zhang, Z. Deep learning-based channel estimation for massive MIMO with hybrid transceivers. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2022, 7, 5162–5174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khraisat, A.; Gondal, I.; Vamplew, P.; Kamruzzaman, J. Survey of intrusion detection systems: Techniques, datasets and challenges. Cybersecurity 2019, 20, 50–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Feng, W.; Xing, J.; Yang, P.; Sobelman, G.E.; Lin, D.; Li, S. Hybrid beam forming/combining for millimeter wave MIMO: A machine learning approach. IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech. 2020, 10, 11353–11368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Björnson, E.; Matthaiou, M.; Ng, D.W.K.; Yang, H.; Love, D.J. Prospective multiple antenna technologies for beyond 5G. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2020, 38, 1637–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, M.; Han, L.; Lu, H.; Fu, C. Distributed collaborative intrusion detection system for vehicular Ad Hoc networks based on invariant. Comput. Netw. 2020, 172, 122–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Björnson, E.; Sanguinetti, L. Making cell-free massive MIMO competitive with MMSE processing and centralized implementation. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2020, 19, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, Y.; Tang, P.; Zhang, J.; Liu, S.; Yin, Y.; Liu, B.; Xia, L. Channel Characteristics and Link Adaption for Visible Light Communication in an Industrial Scenario. Sensors 2023, 23, 3442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Björnson, E.; Sanguinetti, L. Scalable cell-free massive MIMO systems. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2020, 68, 4247–4261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huo, Y. Internet of space craft for multi-planetary defense and prosperity. Signals 2022, 3, 428–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emon, E.I.; Islam, A.M.; Bashar, M.S.; Ahmed, A. Performance evaluation of an optically transparent micro strip patch antenna for 5G applications using ITO and soda lime glass substrate. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2024, 114, 109073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hesham, N.; Chaaban, A.; Elsawy, H.; Hossain, M.J. Finite Blocklength Regime Performance of Downlink Large Scale Networks. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2305.12760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buzzi, S.; D’Andrea, C. Cell-free massive MIMO: User-centric approach. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2017, 6, 706–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikołajewska, E.; Prokopowicz, P.; Mikolajewski, D. Computational gait analysis using fuzzy logic for every day clinical purposes—Preliminary findings. Bio-Algorithms Med.-Syst. 2017, 13, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rojek, I.; Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, M.; Piechowski, M.; Mikołajewski, D. An Artificial Intelligence Approach for Improving Maintenance to Supervise Machine Failures and Support Their Repair. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 4971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dostatni, E.; Rojek, I.; Hamrol, A. The Use of Machine Learning Method in Concurrent Ecodesign of Products and Technological Processes. In Advances in Manufacturing; Hamrol, A., Ciszak, O., Legutko, S., Jurczyk, M., Eds.; Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 321–330. [Google Scholar]
- Rojek, I.; Dostatni, E.; Hamrol, A. Ecodesign of Technological Processes with the Use of Decision Trees Method. In International Joint Conference SOCO’17-CISIS’17-ICEUTE’17 2017, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Pérez García, H., Alfonso-Cendón, J., Sánchez González, L., Quintián, H., Corchado, E., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 649, pp. 318–327. [Google Scholar]
- Polymeni, S.; Plastras, S.; Skoutas, D.N.; Kormentzas, G.; Skianis, C. The Impact of 6G-IoT Technologies on the Development of Agriculture 5.0: A Review. Electronics 2023, 12, 2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sufyan, A.; Khan, K.B.; Khashan, O.A.; Mir, T.; Mir, U. From 5G to beyond 5G: A Comprehensive Survey of Wireless Network Evolution, Challenges, and Promising Technologies. Electronics 2023, 12, 2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajawat, A.S.; Goyal, S.B.; Chauhan, C.; Bedi, P.; Prasad, M.; Jan, T. Cognitive Adaptive Systems for Industrial Internet of Things Using Reinforcement Algorithm. Electronics 2023, 12, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Hawawreh, M.; Alazab, M.; Ferrag, M.A.; Hossain, M.S. Securing the Industrial Internet of Things against ransom ware attacks: A comprehensive analysis of the emerging threat landscape and detection mechanisms. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2024, 227, 103809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janani, S. Collaborative Channel Sensing Under S-Aloha for IoT Based CRSN. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. Eng. 2024, 12, 41–56. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, H.; Yu, W.; Griffith, D.; Golmie, N. A Survey on Industrial Internet of Things: A Cyber-Physical Systems Perspective. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 78238–78259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, H.; Liu, X.; Yu, W.; Griffith, D.; Golmie, N. Reinforcement Learning-Based Control and NetworkingCo-design for Industrial Internet of Things. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2020, 38, 885–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mumtaz, S.; Alsohaily, A.; Pang, Z.; Rayes, A.; Tsang, K.F.; Rodriguez, J. Massive Internet of Things for industrial applications: Addressing wireless IIoT connectivity challenges and ecosystem fragmentation. IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 2017, 11, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zanella, A.; Bui, N.; Castellani, A.; Vangelista, L.; Zorzi, M. Internet of Things for Smart Cities. IEEE Internet Things. 2014, 1, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, Z.; Wu, Z.; Muvianto, C.; Gray, J. A data-oriented M2M messaging mechanism for industrial IoT applications. IEEE Internet Things 2017, 4, 236–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, Z.; Haines, R.J.; Kulkarni, P. M2M Communications for E-Health and smart grid: An industrial and standard perspective. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2014, 21, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latvakoski, J.; Alaya, M.; Ganem, H.; Jubeh, B.; Iivari, A.; Leguay, J.; Bosch, J.; Granqvist, N. Towards Horizontal Architecture for Autonomic M2M Service Networks. Future Internet 2014, 6, 261–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Acronym | Explanation |
---|---|
1G | First generation of mobile networks |
2G | Second generation of mobile networks |
3G | Third generation of mobile networks |
3GPP | Third generation partnership project |
4G | Fourth generation of mobile networks |
5G | Fifth generation of mobile networks |
6G | Sixth generation of mobile networks |
AI | Artificial intelligence |
AKA | Authentication and key agreement |
AP | Access point |
AR | Augmented reality |
AS | Angular spread |
BCDID | Blockchain-based collaborative distributed intrusion detection |
BER | Bit error rate |
BFSK | Binary frequency shift keying |
BLE | Bluetooth low energy |
CF-mMIMO | Cell-free massive multiple-input multiple-output |
CIR | Channel impulse response |
CoM2M | Collaboration through M2M messaging |
CPS | Cyber-physical system |
CRSN | Cognitive radio sensor network |
DS | Delay spread |
DL | Deep learning |
DTS | Dynamic bandwidth throttling |
eMBB | Enhanced mobile broadband |
ERLLC | Extremely reliable and low-latency communication |
eSIM | Embedded subscriber identity module |
FA | Factory automation |
FP | Fractional programming |
GEO | Geostationary earth orbit |
HAP | High altitude platform |
HCS | Human-centric services |
ICS | Industrial control system |
IIoT | Industrial Internet of Things |
IMS | Intelligent multi-surface |
IoD | Internet of Drones |
IoE | Internet of Everything |
IoMT | Internet of Medical Things |
IoRT | Internet of Remote Things |
IoT | Internet of Things |
IoV | Internet of Vehicles |
IP | Internet protocol |
IRS | Intelligent reflecting surface |
ISO/OSI | International Organization for Standardization/Open Systems Interconnection |
IUABP | Intelligent-reflecting surface-user equipment association based on pilots |
LAP | Low altitude platform |
LEO | Low earth orbit |
LOS | Line-of-sight |
LTE | Long-term evolution |
M2M | Machine-to-machine |
MAC | Media access control |
MEO | Medium earth orbit |
MIMO | Multiple-input multiple-output |
MIMO-OFDM | Multi-input, multi-output wireless orthogonal frequency division multiplexing |
ML | Machine learning |
mMIMO | Massive multiple-input multiple-output |
MMSE-OSIC | Minimum mean squared error ordered successive elimination constellation |
mMTC | Massive machine-type communication |
mRSU | Mobile roadside unit |
NRZ | Non-return-to-zero |
NOMA | Non-orthogonal multiple access |
NTN | Non-terrestrial networks |
OOK | On–off keying |
OPL | Optical path loss |
PA | Process automation |
PBAS | Pilot-based access point selection |
RF | Radio frequency |
RL | Reinforcement learning |
RSMA | Rate-splitting multiple access |
RSU | Roadside unit |
RTBC | Real-time broadband communication |
SDMA | Spatial division multiple access |
SDN | Software-defined network |
SHA | Smart home automation |
SNR | Signal-to-noise ratio |
THz | Terahertz (communication) |
UAVs | Unmanned aerial vehicles |
UCBC | Uplink centric broadband communication |
uHDD | Ultra-high data density |
uHSLLC | Ultra-reliable low latency communications |
uMUB | Ubiquitous mobile ultra-broadband |
URLLC | Ultra-reliable low-latency communications |
V2X | Vehicle-to-everything |
VANET | Vehicular ad hoc network |
VLC | Visible light communication |
VLEO | Very low earth orbit |
VR | Virtual reality |
WSN | Wireless sensor network |
XL-MIMO | Extra-large multiple-input multiple-output |
XR | Extended reality |
Parameter | Fourth-Generation (4G) | Fifth-Generation (5G) | Sixth-Generation (6G) |
---|---|---|---|
Mobility [km/h] | 350 | 500 | >1000 |
Latency [ms] | <100 | <10 | <0.1 |
Connectivity density [devices/km2] | 105 | 106 | 107 |
Area traffic capacity [Gbps/m2] | 0.001 | 0.01 | 1 |
Peak data rate [Tbps] | 0.002 | 0.02 | >1 |
User experiences data rate [Gbps] | 0.01 | 0.1 | 1 |
Technology | 5G | 5.5G | 6G |
---|---|---|---|
Ultra-reliable and low-latency communications (URLLC) | + | + | |
Massive machine-type communications (mMTC) | + | + | |
Enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB) | + | + | |
Uplink centric broadband communication (UCBC) | + | + | |
Real-time broadband communication (RTBC) | + | + | |
Human-centric services (HCS) | + | + | |
Ubiquitous mobile ultra-broadband (uMUB) | + | ||
Ultra-high data density (uHDD) | + | ||
Ultra-reliable low latency communications (uHSLLC) | + |
Generation | Network Services | Security Solutions |
---|---|---|
1G | Voice services | Unencrypted telephone services |
2G | Voice services and short messages | One-way authentication, unauthorized access |
3G | High-speed Internet, web browsing | Internet protocol (IP) privacy, wireless interface threats |
4G | Improved spectrum efficiency, reduced latency | Media access control (MAC) layer attacks, threats from new devices |
5G | High-speed Internet, more secure systems | Non-terrestrial networks (NTN), software-defined networks (SDN), cloud threats |
6G | Ultra-low latency, variety of applications, extremely reliable and low-latency communication (ERLLC), Internet of Everything (IoE) | AI/ML threats, system attacks |
Limitation | Description |
---|---|
Infrastructure deployment | Deploying 6G infrastructure, including base stations and network equipment, will require significant investment and time. Building the necessary infrastructure to support 6G networks in industrial environments can pose logistical challenges, especially in remote or difficult geographic locations. |
Systems integration | Many industrial facilities still use legacy equipment and systems that may not be compatible with 6G technology. Updating or upgrading existing infrastructure to support 6G M2M communications may involve additional costs and complexity, requiring careful planning and investment. |
Standardization | Sixth-generation technology is still in its early stages of development and standards have not yet been fully defined. The process of developing and standardizing 6G technology could take several years, which may lead to delays in widespread adoption and deployment. |
Interference and signal attenuation | The higher frequency bands used in 6G networks are prone to higher signal attenuation and are more susceptible to interference from environmental factors such as buildings, foliage, and weather conditions. This may impact the reliability and performance of M2M communications, especially in outdoor industrial environments with complex topology. |
Spectrum availability | Sixth-generation networks are expected to use higher frequency bands, including terahertz (THz) frequencies, to achieve higher data rates and capacity. However, these frequency bands pose challenges in terms of propagation and coverage characteristics, requiring innovative antenna technologies and deployment strategies. Additionally, spectrum allocation and regulatory issues may hinder the availability of appropriate frequencies for 6G deployment. |
Power consumption | The higher data rates and increased processing requirements of 6G networks may result in higher power consumption compared with previous generations. This may pose a challenge for battery-powered devices and IoT sensors deployed in industrial settings, where energy efficiency is crucial for long-term maintenance-free operation. |
Security and privacy | Sixth-generation networks may be susceptible to security breaches, hacking and privacy breaches. Providing robust security mechanisms and protocols to protect M2M communications in Industry 4.0 environments will be essential to mitigate these threats and build trust in the reliability and integrity of 6G networks. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Rojek, I.; Kotlarz, P.; Dorożyński, J.; Mikołajewski, D. Sixth-Generation (6G) Networks for Improved Machine-to-Machine (M2M) Communication in Industry 4.0. Electronics 2024, 13, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13101832
Rojek I, Kotlarz P, Dorożyński J, Mikołajewski D. Sixth-Generation (6G) Networks for Improved Machine-to-Machine (M2M) Communication in Industry 4.0. Electronics. 2024; 13(10):1832. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13101832
Chicago/Turabian StyleRojek, Izabela, Piotr Kotlarz, Janusz Dorożyński, and Dariusz Mikołajewski. 2024. "Sixth-Generation (6G) Networks for Improved Machine-to-Machine (M2M) Communication in Industry 4.0" Electronics 13, no. 10: 1832. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13101832
APA StyleRojek, I., Kotlarz, P., Dorożyński, J., & Mikołajewski, D. (2024). Sixth-Generation (6G) Networks for Improved Machine-to-Machine (M2M) Communication in Industry 4.0. Electronics, 13(10), 1832. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13101832