Next Article in Journal
Transfer of know-how based on learning outcomes for development of open innovation
Previous Article in Journal
Medical innovation and social externality
 
 
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity is published by MDPI from Volume 4 Issue 2 (2018). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Springer.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Valuations using royalty data in the life sciences area—focused on anticancer and cardiovascular therapies

by
Jeong Hee Lee
1,
Youngyong In
1,
L-Hyung Lee
2 and
Joon Woo Lee
2,*
1
Digital Science Co., Ltd. (DS), # 304, 3F, Kumkang B/D, 71 Garak-ro, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-846, South Korea
2
Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI), Hoegi-ro, 66 Dongdemun-gu, Seoul 130-741, South Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2016, 2(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-015-0025-5
Submission received: 23 July 2015 / Accepted: 8 December 2015 / Published: 15 January 2016

Abstract

Purpose: This research seeks to answer the basic question, “How can we build up the formula to estimate the proper royalty rate and up-front payment using the data I can get simply as input?” This paper suggests a way to estimate the proper royalty rate and up-front payment using a formula derived from the regression of historical royalty dataset.
Design/methodology/approach: This research analyzes the dataset, including the royalty-related data like running royalty rate (back-end payments) and up-front payment (up-front fee + milestones), regarding drug candidates for specific drug classes, like anticancer or cardiovascular, by regression analysis. Then, the formula to predict royalty-related data is derived using the attrition rate for the corresponding development phase of the drug candidate for the license deal and the revenue data of the license buyer (licensee). Lastly, the relationship between the formula to predict royalty-related data and the expected net present value is investigated.
Findings: For the anticancer (antineoplastics) and cardiovascular drug classes, the formula to predict the royalty rate and up-front payment is as follows.
X = (Attrition Rate * Licensee Revenue)/100

< Drug Class : Anticancer activity candidates >

Royalty Rate = (1 + a * X)/(b+ c * X)
= (1 + –5.14147E‐09*X)/(0.128436559 +–6.37E–10 * X) (1)

Upfront payment (Up‐front + Milestones) = (a + X)/(b + c * X)
= (–133620928.7 + X)/(–3.990489631 + 2.04191E–08 * X) (2)

X = (Attrition Rate * Licensee Revenue)/100


< Drug Class : Cardiovascular activity drug candidates >

Royalty Rate = y0 + a/X + b/X2
=9.26e + 0 + (−8.528 + 5)/X + 1.744e + 10/X2 (3)

Upfront payment (Up‐front + Milestone) = y0 +ax + bx2
= 7.103e + 6 + (–3.990489631) * X + (–1.536e–12) * X2 (4)

In the case of Equations Equation 2 and Equation 4, it is statistically meaningful (R2: 039–0.41); however, in the case of Equations Equation 1 and Equation 3, it has a weak relationship (R2: 022–0.28), thus requiring further study.
Research limitations/implications (if applicable): This research is limited to the relationship between two drug classes—anticancer (antineoplastics) and cardiovascular—and royalty-related data.
Practical implications (if applicable): Valuation for the drug candidate within a specific drug class can be possible, and the royalty rate can be a variable according to drug class and licensee revenue.
Keywords: Valuation, Licensing deal, Drug, Royalty data, Royalty rate, Up-front fee, Milestones, Regression, Drug class, Anticancer, Antineoplastics, Attrition rate, Development phase, Licensee, Life sciences, rNPV, eNPV (expected NPV), DCF, QSAR, Computational chemistry Valuation, Licensing deal, Drug, Royalty data, Royalty rate, Up-front fee, Milestones, Regression, Drug class, Anticancer, Antineoplastics, Attrition rate, Development phase, Licensee, Life sciences, rNPV, eNPV (expected NPV), DCF, QSAR, Computational chemistry

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, J.H.; In, Y.; Lee, L.-H.; Lee, J.W. Valuations using royalty data in the life sciences area—focused on anticancer and cardiovascular therapies. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2016, 2, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-015-0025-5

AMA Style

Lee JH, In Y, Lee L-H, Lee JW. Valuations using royalty data in the life sciences area—focused on anticancer and cardiovascular therapies. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2016; 2(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-015-0025-5

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Jeong Hee, Youngyong In, L-Hyung Lee, and Joon Woo Lee. 2016. "Valuations using royalty data in the life sciences area—focused on anticancer and cardiovascular therapies" Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 2, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-015-0025-5

APA Style

Lee, J. H., In, Y., Lee, L. -H., & Lee, J. W. (2016). Valuations using royalty data in the life sciences area—focused on anticancer and cardiovascular therapies. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-015-0025-5

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop