Next Article in Journal
Iontophoresis: A Potential Emergence of a Transdermal Drug Delivery System
Previous Article in Journal
Scientia Pharmaceutica, Autorenhinweise 2010
 
 
Scientia Pharmaceutica is published by MDPI from Volume 84 Issue 3 (2016). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Austrian Pharmaceutical Society (Österreichische Pharmazeutische Gesellschaft, ÖPhG).
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nitric Oxide is a Potential Diagnostic Marker for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

by
Laila A. EISSA
1,*,
Nada H. EISA
1,
Mohamed A. EBRAHIM
2,
Maha RAGAB
3 and
Amal M. EL-GAYAR
1
1
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt
2
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt. 2 Oncology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt
3
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sci. Pharm. 2013, 81(3), 763-776; https://doi.org/10.3797/scipharm.1307-09
Submission received: 12 July 2013 / Accepted: 8 August 2013 / Published: 8 August 2013

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer in men and the seventh most common in women. This cancer varies widely in incidence throughout the world, with rising incidence in Egypt. HCC is considered the second most frequent cause of cancer incidence and mortality among men in Egypt. This study aimed to estimate the serum levels of nitric oxide (NO) and glutathione reductase in order to evaluate their role as oxidative status markers in HCC development and progression. For this purpose, serum levels of these parameters were assessed in 50 HCC patients, and 30 cirrhotic patients in addition to 15 healthy subjects as a control group. In the present study, glutathione reductase activity showed a significant increase in HCC as compared to the control group (P= 0.019). On the other hand, no significant difference was observed between the cirrhotic and HCC patients (P= 0.492). Serum NO was significantly higher in patients with HCC than in cirrhotic patients (P= 0.001) or the control group (P= 0.001), with a sensitivity of (74%) and specificity of (88.89%) at a cut-off level of 614.1 μmol/l. While AFP, alpha-fetoprotein, at a cutoff level of 200 ng/ml had a sensitivity of (52%), the specificity was (100%). Indeed, nitric oxide was high in 62.5% of AFP-negative HCC patients. In conclusion, glutathione reductase has no role in HCC diagnosis. However, nitric oxide is a potential diagnostic marker for HCC. The simultaneous determination of serum nitric oxide and AFP gave significant improvement in the detection of HCC patients compared to that of AFP alone.
Keywords: Nitric oxide; Glutathione reductase; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Alpha-fetoprotein Nitric oxide; Glutathione reductase; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Alpha-fetoprotein

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

EISSA, L.A.; EISA, N.H.; EBRAHIM, M.A.; RAGAB, M.; EL-GAYAR, A.M. Nitric Oxide is a Potential Diagnostic Marker for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Sci. Pharm. 2013, 81, 763-776. https://doi.org/10.3797/scipharm.1307-09

AMA Style

EISSA LA, EISA NH, EBRAHIM MA, RAGAB M, EL-GAYAR AM. Nitric Oxide is a Potential Diagnostic Marker for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Scientia Pharmaceutica. 2013; 81(3):763-776. https://doi.org/10.3797/scipharm.1307-09

Chicago/Turabian Style

EISSA, Laila A., Nada H. EISA, Mohamed A. EBRAHIM, Maha RAGAB, and Amal M. EL-GAYAR. 2013. "Nitric Oxide is a Potential Diagnostic Marker for Hepatocellular Carcinoma" Scientia Pharmaceutica 81, no. 3: 763-776. https://doi.org/10.3797/scipharm.1307-09

APA Style

EISSA, L. A., EISA, N. H., EBRAHIM, M. A., RAGAB, M., & EL-GAYAR, A. M. (2013). Nitric Oxide is a Potential Diagnostic Marker for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Scientia Pharmaceutica, 81(3), 763-776. https://doi.org/10.3797/scipharm.1307-09

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop