Next Article in Journal
Casimir and Casimir-Polder Forces in Graphene Systems: Quantum Field Theoretical Description and Thermodynamics
Next Article in Special Issue
Ricci Linear Weyl/Maxwell Mutual Sourcing
Previous Article in Journal
Constructing Higher-Dimensional Exact Black Holes in Einstein-Maxwell-Scalar Theory
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation of the Elliptic Flow Fluctuations of the Identified Particles Using the a Multi-Phase Transport Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Letter

Entangling Superconducting Qubits through an Analogue Wormhole

Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC, Serrano, 113-bis, 28006 Madrid, Spain
Universe 2020, 6(9), 149; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe6090149
Submission received: 7 August 2020 / Revised: 7 September 2020 / Accepted: 8 September 2020 / Published: 9 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Universe: 5th Anniversary)

Abstract

:
We propose an experimental setup to test the effect of curved spacetime upon the extraction of entanglement from the quantum field vacuum to a pair of two-level systems. We consider two superconducting qubits coupled to a dc-SQUID array embedded into an open microwave transmission line, where an external bias can emulate a spacetime containing a traversable wormhole. We find that the amount of vacuum entanglement that can be extracted by the qubits depends on the wormhole parameters. At some distances qubits which would be in a separable state in flat spacetime would become entangled due to the analogue wormhole background.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The vacuum of a quantum field is an entangled state [1,2]. Vacuum fluctuations exhibit correlations between different space-time regions, even if they are spacelike separated. This fact underlies many important predictions of Quantum Field Theory in general backgrounds, such as the Dynamical Casimir Effect [3] and Unruh–Hawking radiation [4,5,6,7,8,9]. From a more applied viewpoint, it seems natural to ask if these correlations can be exploited as a resource for Quantum Information tasks. This question can be addressed by two alternative approaches. On the one hand, moving boundary conditions can turn vacuum fluctuations into real particles via the dynamical Casimir effect, which has recently been experimentally observed [10]. These particles are produced in quantum-correlated pairs [11,12,13,14,15]. On the other hand, entanglement can in principle be swapped to qubits [16,17,18,19] after an interaction with the field. Despite several proposals, the latter possibility has never been confirmed experimentally.
In general, the scenario for extracting vacuum entanglement can be described as follows. At least two qubits are prepared in an uncorrelated state and interact for a finite time with a quantum field initially in the vacuum state. If t is the interaction time, r is the distance between the qubits, and v is the propagation velocity of the field quanta, entanglement from the vacuum will be swapped to the qubits if their state is entangled after t < r / v . For t > r / v , the qubits might exchange real photons, which might act as an additional source of correlation. An obvious experimental challenge is to achieve the desired interaction time, which requires control of the interaction on timescales that are typically out of reach. However, recent developments in the analysis of quantum information in relativistic scenarios show that the entanglement of relativistic quantum fields is sensitive to acceleration, gravity, and the dynamics of spacetime [20]. It seems natural to ask if we can exploit these properties to relax the experimental requirements necessary for extracting vacuum entanglement. Indeed, the extraction of vacuum entanglement in curved spacetimes have been theoretically considered, for instance in [21,22,23]. However, for experiments it is necessary to adopt an analogue gravity viewpoint [24,25,26,27,28] and search for experimental platforms where curved spacetimes can be simulated.
Circuit QED [29,30] can be a natural framework to address the interaction of two-level systems with a quantum field. Superconducting qubits can be coupled to transmission lines, giving rise to an artificial one-dimensional matter-radiation interaction enjoying experimental accessibility and tunability of physical parameters. Exploiting these advantages, fundamental quantum-field problems typically considered as ideal can be accessible to experimental test. For instance, the ultrastrong coupling regime [31,32,33,34,35] has already been leveraged in order to propose an experimental test of the vacuum entanglement extraction to a pair of spacelike separated artificial atoms [18]. Moreover, effective spacetime metrics can be implemented as well by means of suitable modulations of the effective speed of light in the electromagnetic medium [36].
One important example of nontrivial curved background is the Ellis metric [37], representing an spacetime which contains a traversable wormhole [38]. We do not have any experimental evidence of the presence of traversable wormholes in the universe, although observational-based bounds have been determined [39]. Indeed, the existence of traversable wormholes would entail a challenge to the theoretical notion of causality [38,40,41,42]. This led Hawking to pose the “chronology protection conjecture” [41], which is formulated within the semiclassical framework of quantum field theory in curved spacetime. According to this conjecture, quantum effects would prevent the creation of closed timelike curves in spacetimes such as Ellis, thus ruling out the possibility of time traveling to the past. The conjecture could only be totally proved or disproved with a full theory of quantum gravity, which remains elusive. From a strictly classical viewpoint, traversable wormholes would require exotic energy sources, namely, these sources would violate the weak energy condition [40]. Moreover, quantum constraints can be inferred in the form of “quantum inequalities” [43]. However, as unlikely as the existence of traversable wormholes might be, it is not completely forbidden on theoretical grounds. Furthermore, it has been suggested that phenomena typically attributed to black holes might as well be produced by exotic objects such as Ellis wormholes. If wormholes existed, even the origin of the detected gravitational waves could be questioned [44,45] together with the identity of the objects in the center of the galaxies [46]. On the other hand, the existence of closed timelike curves would have a significant impact on classical and quantum computing [47] and wormholes are at the core of the “EPR-ER” conjecture [48]. For all these reasons there is renewed interest in the theoretical characterization of these objects [49,50,51] and in their detection by gravitational lensing [52,53], and other classical methods [54], or by quantum techniques [55,56]. Finally, classical [57,58,59,60] and quantum simulators of Ellis and other wormhole spacetimes have been discussed in quantum setups such as superconducting circuits [61], trapped ions [51], or Bose–Einstein condensates [62].
In this paper, we consider a setup of two superconducting qubits coupled to a dc-SQUID array embedded into an open transmission line, with an external bias emulating the required traversable wormhole metric [61]. We show that the vacuum entanglement that can be extracted by the two-level systems depends upon the wormhole parameters. The features of this dependence are in turn sensitive to the distance between the qubits. We find a regime of distance where the presence of the wormhole entangles the artificial atoms, which would remain separable if the spacetime were flat.

2. Model and Results

A traversable 1-D section of a spacetime containing a massless traversable wormhole can be describd by the following line element [40,61]:
d s 2 = c 2 d t 2 + 1 1 b ( r ) r d r 2 ,
where the shape function b ( r ) encodes the wormhole features and is a function of the radius r only. The value b 0 of r such that b ( r = b 0 ) = r = b 0 determines the throat of the wormhole. The proper radial position with respect to the throat is [40] l = ± b 0 r d r ( 1 b ( r ) / r ) 1 / 2 , which defines two different “universes” or branches in a single universe for l > 0 (r from ∞ to b 0 ) and l < 0 (r from b 0 to ∞). Therefore, as r there are two asymptotically flat spacetime regions l ± , which are connected only by the throat of a wormhole in l = 0 ( r = b 0 ).
An example of interest is [37,38,49,50]:
b ( r ) = b 0 2 r ,
which leads to l 2 ( r ) = r 2 b 0 2 .
It is shown in [61] that the equations of motion of a quantum field in the spacetime given by Equation (1) is equivalent to the one in d s 2 = c 2 ( 1 b ( r ) r ) d t 2 + d r 2 , where we can also define an r-dependent speed of propagation given by: c 2 ( r ) = c 2 ( 1 b ( r ) r ) . Furthermore, this effective speed of light can be mimicked for the electromagnetic flux field propagating in a dc-SQUID array embedded in an open transmission line [63,64,65,66], with a particular profile of the external field. In particular, in order to simulate the spacetime given by Equation (1) the profile must be: ϕ e x t ( r ) = ϕ 0 π arccos ( 1 b ( r ) r ) . The position x along the transmission line can be related to the coordinate r via | x | = r b 0 , x ( , ) . Thus x = 0 at the throat r = b 0 and has different signs at both sides. Notice that l 2 = | x | ( | x | + 2 b 0 ) . Thus, we can rewrite the flux profile as a function of x: ϕ e x t ( x ) = ϕ 0 π arccos ( 1 b 0 2 ( | x | + b 0 ) 2 ) . It is shown in [61] that in the particular wormhole spacetimes given by Equation (2) it is possible to achieve a simulated wormhole throat radius in the sub-mm range.
Now we assume that two superconducting qubits couple to the SQUID-embedded transmission line described above. The qubit-line coupling strength can be abruptly switched on and off and can reach the ultrastrong coupling regime. In flat spacetime, the extraction of entanglement from the quantum vacuum to a pair of superconducting qubits was analyzed in [18]. The Hamiltonian, H = H 0 + H I , splits into a free part H 0 for qubits and field H 0 = 1 2 Ω ( σ A z + σ B z ) + k ω ( k ) a k a k and a standard interaction among them H I α = A , B σ A x V ( χ α ) . V is the quantum field, which is written in terms of the creation and annihilation operators V ( χ ) d k N ω k e i k χ a k + H . c . . Here χ A and χ B would be the constant positions of the atoms in a coordinate system in which the spacetime metric is flat. In the flat spacetime case of [18] those are the standard laboratory coordinates { t , x } . In the effective curved spacetime that we are considering here they are { t , l } .
We consider the initial state | ψ ( 0 ) = | e g | 0 , with qubit A in the excited state, while qubit B is in its ground state and the field is in the vacuum state. The evolution in the interaction picture is given by:
| ψ ( t ) = T [ e i 0 t d t H I ( t ) / ] | e g | 0 ,
where T is the time ordering operator. We compute the corresponding two-qubit reduced density matrix ρ 12 after an interaction time t in second-order perurbation theory beyond the Rotating Wave Approximation and tracing over the field [18]. The amount of entanglement of the X-state can be computed by several means. We choose one of the most standard measures for two-qubit systems, namely the concurrence, which is: C ( ρ 12 ) = 2 | X | k | A 1 , k | 2 k | B 1 , k | 2 1 / 2 , where X stands for the amplitude of photon exchange and k | A 1 , k | 2 , k | B 1 , k | 2 for the probability of emission of a photon by qubits 1 and 2, respectively. Using the techniques in [18] we compute these magnitudes as a function of three dimensionless parameters, ξ , K 1 , and K 2 . The first one, ξ = c t / ρ , ( ρ being the constant distance between the qubits ρ = | χ a χ b | ) allows us to discriminate between two different spacetime regions, namely, the qubits are effectively spacelike separated if ξ < 1 and timelike separated otherwise. The remaining parameters are the dimensionless coupling strengths for qubits 1 and 2: K m = g m / Ω m 2 . We will restrict our analysis to K m Ω m t 1 where our perturbative approach remains valid. We assume that g 1 = g 2 = g and Ω 1 = Ω 2 = Ω , and thus K 1 = K 2 = K .
The results of [18] are directly valid to the coordinate system { t , l } , for which the metric is flat. It is therefore necessary to transform the parameter ξ to the laboratory coordinates. For simplicity, we assume that the qubit position are symmetric with respect to the throat:
x B = | x A | = x A .
Then, by using the relation between x and l:
l B l A = 2 x B 1 + 2 ξ b ,
where we introduce a dimensionless parameter:
ξ b = b 0 x B ,
relating the throat size with the qubit distance in the laboratory coordinates ρ x = 2 x B . Thus, from Equation (5) we get the relation between the qubit distance in free-falling and laboratory coordinates:
ρ l = ρ x 1 + 2 ξ b .
Moreover, while in the flat coordinate system the time that takes the light to travel between qubits is merely ( l B l A ) / c , in the laboratory this time will be given by:
t A B = x A x B d x c ( x ) = l B l A c 2 b 0 c arcsinh ( 1 2 ξ B ) + b 0 c log 1 + 1 ξ B ( 1 + 1 + 2 ξ B ) .
Thus, the new parameter:
ξ x = t t A B
will define the light cone in the laboratory system. If ξ x < 1 , light cannot travel between the qubits. By means of Equation (8), we can relate ξ x with the light cone parameter in free-falling coordinates:
ξ l = c t l B l A .
We get:
ξ l = 1 1 ξ x + ξ B ξ F arcsinh ( 1 2 ξ B ) ξ B 2 ξ F log 1 + 1 ξ B ( 1 + 1 + 2 ξ B ) ,
where we introduce ξ F , which would be the light cone parameter in flat spacetime:
ξ F = c t 2 x B .
Note that in the absence of a wormhole ( b 0 = 0 ), from Equation (11) we get ξ l = ξ x = ξ F , as expected. Generally speaking, it is expected that the extraction of entanglement decay with the distance mimicking the decay of vacuum correlations of the field. By inserting Equations (7) and (11) in the flat-spacetime results, we show in Figure 1 the dependence of the entanglement dynamics on the wormhole parameter b 0 . As expected, it is highly dependent on the qubit distance, since vacuum correlations decay with distance. Indeed, we find three separate regimes. For ultrashort qubit distances ρ x λ —where λ = 2 π c / Ω would be the wavelength of the qubit transition in flat spacetime—there is entanglement between qubits both inside and outside the light cone which seems to be independent of the existence and size of a wormhole throat. As ρ x is increased the dynamics of entanglement becomes sensitive to the wormhole. First, the effect is detrimental: At distances at which there is entanglement generation around the light cone in the absence of a wormhole—in agreement with the flat-spacetime results [18]—entanglement vanishes quickly as ε b increases. However, for larger distances ρ x λ some entanglement is generated for timelike separated qubits only if ε b 0 . Therefore, qubits which would be in a separable state in flat spacetime would get entangled due to the existence of the curved background. Since ε x > 1 , we cannot say that this is a pure transference of vacuum entanglement, since there could have been photon exchange between the qubits. However, it is still interesting that the effect is a consequence of the presence of an effective curved spacetime. The topological link between the qubits provided by the wormhole enhances photon exchange, making it strong enough to generate quantum correlations.
This entanglement generation between qubits due to an analogue curved spacetime is the main result of this work. We believe that it is within reach of circuit QED technology. Superconducting transmon qubits has been coupled to transmission lines formed by thousands of SQUIDS [67]. In [61] we showed that it is possible to simulate wormholes with b 0 in the sub-mm range by means of an inhomogenuous external magnetic field bias. On the other hand, we need b 0 to be slightly larger than the wavelength λ , since b 0 / λ b 0 / ρ x = b 0 / ( 2 x b ) = ε b / 2 and interesting effects show up for ε b 5 . This means that λ in the sub-mm range is required. For qubits of Ω = 2 π × 10 GHz this means propagation speed velocities c for the field of around 10 6 m / s . These speeds has been experimentally reported in SQUID arrays [68]. Another experimental challenge would be the preparation of a pure initial quantum vacuum for the field. However, for realistic temperatures of 30 mK [69] the number of thermal photons at 5 mK is as low as 3 · 10 4 so the effect of thermal noise should be negligible. In order to test the effects of effective curved spacetime on the extraction of vacuum entanglement, the experiment should be repeated with and without external bias (wormhole) and the comparison of the results should follow our predictions. A fully detailed experimental description would lie beyond the scope of the current theoretical work.

3. Conclusions

In summary, we proposed a setup of two superconducting qubits coupled to a SQUID array transmission line to test the extraction of entanglement from the vacuum of a quantum field in curved spacetime, in particular, the Ellis wormhole metric, simulated by means of a suitable external bias of the SQUID array. It was found that different regimes in which, according to the distance between the qubits, the presence of the Ellis wormhole could be irrelevant, detrimental to entanglement generation, or beneficial. We think that the latter was the most interesting scenario. In particular, it was found that when the distance between the qubits was similar to the wavelength of the qubit transition, there was no entanglement extraction unless the wormhole throat was significantly larger than a certain value ( ε b 5 ). This means that a pair of qubits which would be separable in flat spacetime would become entangled due to the effective curved background. We have shown that this would be in principle observable with current circuit QED technology. Therefore, we found that the analysis of analogue quantum simulators of quantum field theory in curved spacetime was not only interesting from a theoretical viewpoint and has possible experimental applications as a valuable resource for quantum technologies.

Funding

C.S. has received financial support through the Postdoctoral Junior Leader Fellowship Programme from la Caixa Banking Foundation (LCF/BQ/LR18/11640005).

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Summers, S.J.; Werner, R.F. The vacuum violates Bell’s inequalities. Phys. Lett. A 1985, 110, 257–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Summers, S.J.; Werner, R.F. Bell’s inequalities and quantum field theory. II. Bell’s inequalities are maximally violated in the vacuum. J. Math. Phys. 1987, 28, 2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Moore, G.T. Quantum Theory of the Electromagnetic Field in a Variable-Length One-Dimensional Cavity. J. Math. Phys. 1970, 11, 2679–2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fulling, S.A. Nonuniqueness of canonical field quantization in Riemannian space-time. Phys. Rev. D 1973, 7, 2850–2862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hawking, S.W. Black hole explosions? Nature 1974, 248, 30–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Davies, P. Scalar production in Schwarzschild and Rindler metrics. J. Phys. A 1975, 8, 609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Unruh, W.G. Notes on black-hole evaporation. Phys. Rev. D 1976, 14, 870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Bell, J.S.; Leinaas, J.M. Electrons as accelerated thermometers. Nucl. Phys. B 1983, 212, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Akhmedov, E.T.; Singleton, D. On the relation between Unruh and Sokolov–Ternov effects. Int. J. Mod. Phys. 2007, 22, 4797–4823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wilson, C.M.; Johansson, G.; Pourkabirian, A.; Simoen, M.; Johansson, J.R.; Duty, T.; Nori, F.; Delsing, P. Observation of the dynamical Casimir effect in a superconducting circuit. Nature 2011, 479, 376–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Johansson, J.R.; Johansson, G.; Wilson, C.M.; Delsing, P.; Nori, F. Nonclassical microwave radiation from the dynamical Casimir effect. Phys. Rev. A 2013, 87, 043804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Sabín, C.; Fuentes, I.; Johansson, G. Quantum discord in the dynamical Casimir effect. Phys. Rev. A 2015, 92, 012314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Sabín, C.; Adesso, G. Generation of quantum steering and interferometric power in the dynamical Casimir effect. Phys. Rev. A 2015, 92, 042107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. De Buruaga, D.N.S.S.; Sabín, C. Quantum coherence in the dynamical Casimir effect. Phys. Rev. A 2017, 95, 022307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Felicetti, S.; Sanz, M.; Lamata, L.; Romero, G.; Johansson, G.; Delsing, P.; Solano, E. Dynamical Casimir effect entangles artificial atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 093602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Reznik, B.; Retzker, A.; Silman, J. Violating Bell’s inequalities in vacuum. Phys. Rev. A 2005, 71, 042104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Retzker, A.; Cirac, J.I.; Reznik, B. Detecting vacuum entanglement in a linear ion trap. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94, 050504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Sabín, C.; García-Ripoll, J.J.; Solano, E.; León, J. Dynamics of entanglement via propagating microwave photons. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 81, 184501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sabín, C.; Peropadre, B.; del Rey, M.; Martín-Martínez, E. Extracting past-future vacuum correlations using circuit QED. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 033602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Alsing, P.M.; Fuentes, I. Observer-dependent entanglement. Class. Quantum Gravity 2012, 29, 224001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ng, K.K.; Mann, R.B.; Martín-Martínez, E. New techniques for entanglement harvesting in flat and curved spacetimes. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 97, 125011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Henderson, L.J.; Hennigar, R.A.; Mann, R.B.; Smith, A.R.H.; Zhang, J. Harvesting entanglement from the black hole vacuum. Class. Quantum Gravity 2018, 35, 21LT02. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Ng, K.K.; Mann, R.B.; Martín-Martínez, E. Unruh-DeWitt detectors and entanglement: The anti–de Sitter space. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 98, 125005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Barceló, C.; Liberati, S.; Visser, M. Analogue gravity. Living Rev. Relativ. 2011, 14, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Visser, M.; Molina-Paris, C. Acoustic geometry for general relativistic barotropic irrotational fluid flow. New J. Phys. 2010, 12, 095014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Moncrief, V. Stability of stationary, spherical accretion onto a Schwarzschild black hole. Astrophys. J. 1980, 235, 1038–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ge, X.-H.; Nakahara, M.; Sin, S.-J.; Tian, Y.; Wu, S.-F. Acoustic black holes in curved spacetime and the emergence of analogue Minkowski spacetime. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 99, 104047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ge, X.-H.; Wu, S.-F.; Wang, Y.; Yang, G.-H.; Shen, Y.-G. Acoustic black holes from supercurrent tunneling. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 2012, 21, 1250038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Wallraff, A.; Schuster, D.; Blais, A.; Frunzio, L.; Huang, R.S.; Majer, J.; Kumar, S.; Girvin, S.M.; Schoelkopf, R.J. Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nature 2004, 431, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Haroche, S.; Brune, M.; Raimond, J.M. From cavity to circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nature Phys. 2020, 16, 243–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bourassa, J.; Gambetta, J.M.; Abdumalikov, A.A.; Astafiev, O.; Nakamura, Y.; Blais, A. Ultrastrong coupling regime of cavity QED with phase-biased flux qubits. Phys. Rev. A 2009, 80, 032109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Forn-Díaz, P.; Lisenfeld, J.; Marcos, D.; García-Ripoll, J.J.; Solano, E.; Harmans, C.J.P.M.; Mooij, J.E. Observation of the Bloch-Siegert shift in a qubit-oscillator system in the ultrastrong coupling regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 237001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Peropadre, B.; Forn-Díaz, P.; Solano, E.; García-Ripoll, J.J. Switchable ultrastrong coupling in circuit QED. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 023601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Niemczyk, T.; Deppe, F.; Huebl, H.; Menzel, E.P.; Hocke, F.; Schwarz, M.J.; Garcia-Ripoll, J.J.; Zueco, D.; Hümmer, T.; Solano, E.; et al. Circuit quantum electrodynamics in the ultrastrong-coupling regime. Nat. Phys. 2010, 6, 772–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Forn-Díaz, P.; García-Ripoll, J.J.; Peropadre, B.; Orgiazzi, J.L.; Yurtalan, M.A.; Belyansky, R.; Wilson, C.M.; Lupascu, A. Ultrastrong coupling of a single artificial atom to an electromagnetic continuum in the nonperturbative regime. Nat. Phys. 2017, 13, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nation, P.D.; Johansson, J.R.; Blencowe, M.P.; Nori, F. Colloquium: Stimulating uncertainty: Amplifying the quantum vacuum with superconducting circuits. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2012, 84, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ellis, H.G. Ether flow through a drainhole: A particle model in general relativity. J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 1973, 14, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Morris, M.S.; Thorne, K.S.; Yurtsever, U. Wormholes, time machines, and the weak energy condition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1988, 61, 1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Takahashi, R.; Asada, H. Observational upper bound on the cosmic abundances of negative-mass compact objects and Ellis wormholes from the Sloan digital sky survey quasar lens search. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2013, 768, L16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Morris, M.S.; Thorne, K.S. Wormholes in spacetime and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching general relativity. Am. J. Phys. 1988, 56, 395–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Hawking, S.W. Chronology protection conjecture. Phys. Rev. D 1992, 46, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Deutsch, D. Quantum mechanics near closed timelike lines. Phys. Rev. D 1991, 44, 3197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Ford, L.H.; Roman, T.A. Averaged energy conditions and quantum inequalities. Phys. Rev. D 1995, 51, 4277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Cardoso, V.; Franzin, E.; Pani, P. Erratum: Is the Gravitational-Wave Ringdown a Probe of the Event Horizon? Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 171101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Konoplya, R.A.; Zhidenko, A. Wormholes versus black holes: Quasinormal ringing at early and late times. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2016, 12, 043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Li, Z.; Bambi, C. Distinguishing black holes and wormholes with orbiting hot spots. Phys. Rev. D 2014, 90, 024071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Yuan, X.; Assad, S.M.; Thompson, J.; Haw, J.Y.; Vedral, V.; Ralph, T.C.; Lam, P.K.; Weedbrook, C.; Gu, M. Replicating the benefits of closed timelike curves without breaking causality. Npj Quantum Inf. 2015, 1, 15007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Maldacena, J.; Susskind, L. Cool horizons for entangled black holes. Fortschr. Phys. 2013, 61, 781–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Müller, T. Exact geometric optics in a Morris-Thorne wormhole spacetime. Phys. Rev. D 2008, 77, 044043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Taylor, P. Propagation of test particles and scalar fields on a class of wormhole space-times. Phys. Rev. D 2014, 90, 024057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Sabín, C. Mapping curved spacetimes into Dirac spinors. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Abe, F. Gravitational microlensing by the Ellis wormhole. Astrophys. J. 2010, 725, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Nakajima, K.; Asada, H. Deflection angle of light in an Ellis wormhole geometry. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 85, 107501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Ohgami, T.; Sakai, N. Wormhole shadows. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 91, 124020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Sabín, C. Quantum detection of wormholes. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Sanchidrián-Vaca, C.; Sabín, C. Parameter estimation of wormholes beyond the Heisenberg limit. Universe 2018, 4, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Peloquin, C.; Euvé, L.P.; Philbin, T.; Rousseaux, G. Analog wormholes and black hole laser effects in hydrodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 2016, 93, 084032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Euvé, L.P.; Rousseaux, G. Classical analogue of an interstellar travel through a hydrodynamic wormhole. Phys. Rev. D 2017, 96, 064042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Prat-Camps, J.; Navau, C.; Sanchez, A. A magnetic wormhole. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sabín, C. Light propagation through nanophotonics wormholes. Universe 2018, 4, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Sabín, C. Quantum simulation of traversable wormhole spacetimes in a dc-SQUID array. Phys. Rev. D 2016, 94, 081501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Mateos, J.; Sabín, C. Quantum simulation of traversable wormhole spacetimes in a Bose-Einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 97, 044045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Lähteenmäki, P.; Paraoanu, G.S.; Hassel, J.; Hakonen, P.J. Dynamical Casimir effect in a Josephson metamaterial. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 4234–4238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Haviland, D.K.; Andersson, K.; Agren, P. Superconducting and insulating behavior in one-dimensional Josephson junction arrays. J. Low Temp. Phys. 2000, 118, 733–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Watanabe, M.; Haviland, D.B. Quantum effects in small-capacitance single Josephson junctions. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 67, 094505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Ergül, A.; Schaeffer, D.; Lindblom, M.; Haviland, D.B.; Lidmar, J.; Johansson, J. Phase sticking in one-dimensional josephson junction chains. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88, 104501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Puertas Martínez, J.; Léger, S.; Gheeraert, N.; Dassonneville, R.; Planat, L.; Foroughi, F.; Krupko, Y.; Buisson, O.; Naud, C.; Hasch-Guichard, W.; et al. A Tunable Josephson Platform to Explore Many-Body Quantum Optics in Circuit-QED. Npj Quantum Inf. 2019, 5, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Castellanos-Beltran, M.A.; Lehnert, K.W. Widely tunable parametric amplifier based on a superconducting quantum interference device array resonator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 083509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Sandbo Chang, C.W.; Sabín, C.; Forn-Díaz, P.; Quijandría, F.; Vadiraj, A.M.; Nsanzineza, I.; Johansson, G.; Wilson, C.M. Observation of Three-Photon Spontaneous Parametric Down-Conversion in a Superconducting Parametric Cavity. Phys. Rev. X 2020, 10, 011011. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Concurrence vs. the light-cone parameter ε x and the wormhole parameter ε b for three different qubit distances and K = 7.5 · 10 3 . For the shortest distance (left), the effect of the presence of the analogue wormhole is mostly irrelevant. For medium distances (middle), entanglement appears in the flat-spacetime case and quickly vanishes as b 0 grows (see the inset). For larger distances (right), we find the opposite scenario: There is entanglement only in the presence of the effective wormhole.
Figure 1. Concurrence vs. the light-cone parameter ε x and the wormhole parameter ε b for three different qubit distances and K = 7.5 · 10 3 . For the shortest distance (left), the effect of the presence of the analogue wormhole is mostly irrelevant. For medium distances (middle), entanglement appears in the flat-spacetime case and quickly vanishes as b 0 grows (see the inset). For larger distances (right), we find the opposite scenario: There is entanglement only in the presence of the effective wormhole.
Universe 06 00149 g001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sabín, C. Entangling Superconducting Qubits through an Analogue Wormhole. Universe 2020, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe6090149

AMA Style

Sabín C. Entangling Superconducting Qubits through an Analogue Wormhole. Universe. 2020; 6(9):149. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe6090149

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sabín, Carlos. 2020. "Entangling Superconducting Qubits through an Analogue Wormhole" Universe 6, no. 9: 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe6090149

APA Style

Sabín, C. (2020). Entangling Superconducting Qubits through an Analogue Wormhole. Universe, 6(9), 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe6090149

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop