Next Article in Journal
Astrocytic Connexin43 Channels as Candidate Targets in Epilepsy Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
isomiRs–Hidden Soldiers in the miRNA Regulatory Army, and How to Find Them?
Previous Article in Journal
Cannabidiol: A Potential New Alternative for the Treatment of Anxiety, Depression, and Psychotic Disorders
Previous Article in Special Issue
Computational Methods and Software Tools for Functional Analysis of miRNA Data
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/biom10111576
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

HumiR: Web Services, Tools and Databases for Exploring Human microRNA Data

by
Jeffrey Solomon
1,
Fabian Kern
1,
Tobias Fehlmann
1,
Eckart Meese
2 and
Andreas Keller
1,3,4,*
1
Chair for Clinical Bioinformatics, Saarland University, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany
2
Institute for Human Genetics, Saarland University, 66421 Homburg, Germany
3
Center for Bioinformatics, Saarland University, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany
4
Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2020, 10(11), 1576; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10111576
Submission received: 19 October 2020 / Revised: 13 November 2020 / Accepted: 17 November 2020 / Published: 20 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioinformatics Resource and Protocols for Small RNA Research)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
For many research aspects on small non-coding RNAs, especially microRNAs, computational tools and databases are developed. This includes quantification of miRNAs, piRNAs, tRNAs and tRNA fragments, circRNAs and others. Furthermore, the prediction of new miRNAs, isomiRs, arm switch events, target and target pathway prediction and miRNA pathway enrichment are common tasks. Additionally, databases and resources containing expression profiles, e.g., from different tissues, organs or cell types, are generated. This information in turn leads to improved miRNA repositories. While most of the respective tools are implemented in a species-independent manner, we focused on tools for human small non-coding RNAs. This includes four aspects: (1) miRNA analysis tools (2) databases on miRNAs and variations thereof (3) databases on expression profiles (4) miRNA helper tools facilitating frequent tasks such as naming conversion or reporter assay design. Although dependencies between the tools exist and several tools are jointly used in studies, the interoperability is limited. We present HumiR, a joint web presence for our tools. HumiR facilitates an entry in the world of miRNA research, supports the selection of the right tool for a research task and represents the very first step towards a fully integrated knowledge-base for human small non-coding RNA research. We demonstrate the utility of HumiR by performing a very comprehensive analysis of Alzheimer’s miRNAs.

1. Introduction

In almost all organisms, bacteria, viruses, plants, animals and mammals, research on small non-coding RNA is performed. Among the different classes of small non-coding RNAs, microRNAs (miRNAs) are among the best studied ones. The current state-of-the-art on miRNA research has been published by Bartel in 2018 [1].
Modern high throughput approaches, most importantly massively parallel sequencing, are applied to generate steadily increasing data sets. A search in the sequence read archive (SRA), one of the most frequent repositories for small RNA sequencing data, yields 95,015 data sets. The following list of organisms is covered by over 1000 samples deposited in SRA: Homo sapiens (46,007 samples); Mus musculus (15,758 samples); Rattus norvegicus (2534 samples); Bos taurus (2307 samples); Arabidopsis thaliana (1683 samples); Sus scrofa (1328 samples);
Drosophila melanogaster (1130 samples); Caenorhabditis elegans (1120 samples). Altogether, 115 TB of sequencing data on small RNAs are deposited in SRA, covering 2 × 1012 reads.
The flood of data calls for advanced computational solutions. Chen and co-workers curated 95 review papers covering about 1000 miRNA bioinformatics tools [2]. A great repository that collects an overview of many different miRNA tools from a broad range of applications is Tools4miRs [3]. Although many of the tools are independent of the organism or support several organisms, a certain focus on Homo Sapiens can be recognized. This is motivated by the fact that most and the largest data sets are available for humans as sketched above. The set of tools includes, but is not necessarily limited to, approaches for quantifying miRNAs and other non-coding RNAs, prediction of new representatives from the classes, discovery of isomiRs and other isoforms, prediction of targets and target pathways or the discovery of arm shift and arm switch events. From miRNA research in general, especially, however, from the ever-growing data sets and the new tools, databases on miRNAs are built.
The most prominent and referenced database is the miRBase [4,5] but other databases have also been developed to complement miRBase (MirGeneDB [6] or miRCarta [7] as summarized in [8]). Currently, it is estimated that around 2300 human miRNAs exist that are yet not completely contained in these data bases [9]. In addition to databases with a focus on miRNAs, other resources contain information on predicted or validated targets, variants in miRNAs, isoforms or other structural features. In addition to respective databases, data warehouses have also been generated as resources for miRNA expression patterns, including expression profiles for different organs, tissues, cell types and other specimen types. Here, we do not want to provide anything close to a complete overview of available tools and databases. These can be found in one of the many excellent review articles and tool comparisons on the different topics [2,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
Over the past decade we have implemented tools and resources that are dedicated to foster the analysis and understanding of miRNAs. The joint paradigm of all solutions is in that they must be available as a web service and not require any installation of client-side software. For these tools, the focus has been on Homo sapiens. A limitation of the tools is their very limited interoperability. For example, one tool might generate an output that can directly be processed by another tool. Frequently, researches might benefit, however, not even being aware that an interesting downstream processing tool or data base with relevant information exists. It is our ambition to strengthen the interoperability and provide better access to the tools and data warehouses. As a first step, we wrapped all web services and databases in docker containers. With the ongoing update of the respective solutions, we start to introduce a growing set of RESTful Application Programming Interface. The final result is anticipated to be a central knowledge base and resource for human miRNA research. Here we introduce HumiR, a web presence that puts the different resources in context, describe the different resources and facilitates the selection of the right tools for users. Notably, we also do not intend to benchmark a study and compare it to competing or complementary tools. This is done within the respective original and updated manuscripts. In contrast, we emphasize that alternative solutions exist that may even have advantages when compared to our tool. A great example is our miRNA pathway enrichment tool miEAA [20] where we explicitly notify users to also test their results with the TAM tool developed in the Cui lab [21]. Of course, we mention selected alternatives to our tools in the respective sections below. The focus of this work is thus more to present the tools in context to each other towards a fully integrated solution.
In the following, we will first group the tools into four main categories: (1) miRNA analysis tools (miRMaster [22], miEAA [20], miRTargetLink, miRSwitch, novoMiRank); (2) databases on miRNAs and variations thereof (miRCarta, miRSNPdb, miRPathDB, miRATbase); (3) databases on expression profiles of miRNAs (TissueAtlas, CellTypeAtlas, ATmiRes); (4) miRNA helper tools facilitating frequent tasks, such as miRNA naming conversion or reporter assay design (miRTaH, miRBaseConverter, miBlast). In each category we will briefly describe the task of the tools and databases. In the second section, we will introduce the HumiR resource and how it can be used by researchers. In the third section, we will then describe dependencies between the tools and exemplify workflows through the different tools. Finally, we will provide an outlook on how we will further improve and automate the interoperability of the tools via APIs towards a fully integrated knowledge base.

2. Experiments and Methods

We implemented HumiR, a web presence as entry point to human miRNA research (https://www.ccb.uni-saarland.de/humir/). The web server was implemented using a dockerized version of Django Web Framework (v2.2) running on Python 3.7. The frontend user-interface was built using ReactJS (v16.13) and the Material-UI (v4.9) framework, and bundled by Webpack (v4.25). An Nginx docker container is acting as proxy server in front of the Gunicorn WSGI HTTP server (19.8) providing access to the Django application. The HumiR web interface has been tested with the following browsers: Firefox (version 82.0.3), Safari (version 13.1.1), Google Chrome (Version 87.0.4280.67). The availability of HumiR is monitored on a daily basis by automated API testing.

3. Results

3.1. The Four Categories of Tools

The first set of tools take either high throughput data directly (fastq) or sets of miRNAs as input to process them. While many of the tools also support an analysis of single miRNAs, the actual key criterion is the processing of large data sets. The second set of tools relates to databases that contain information on miRNA sequences or variations thereof, target and target pathway databases. The third set are databases that host expression profiles on miRNAs. Finally, the last set of tools are small helper tools that facilitate important tasks quickly. The tools are shown in context to each other in Figure 1 and summarized in Table 1.

3.2. miRNA Analysis Tools

miRMaster [22,23]: miRMaster is an all-in-one tool for the analysis of raw sequencing data stored in fastq files. The files are compressed client-side in javascript, uploaded and then processed. The tool is tailored for Illumina and BGI/MGISEQ data and also supports samples with unique molecular identifiers as, for example, are implemented in the latest template switch protocols [24]. miRMaster quantifies known miRNAs, miRNAs, tRNAs and other small RNAs, has its own prediction engine for new miRNAs, maps the data to viruses and bacteria, detects isoforms and reports SNVs in miRNAs. Importantly, case control analyses are also supported and differentially expressed features are reported. As of October 2020, over 1400 studies have been performed with miRMaster and almost 100,000 samples (50,000 unique samples) have been processed covering a total of 1.3 trillion reads (600 Billion unique reads). Alternative tools include among others sRNAbench [25], CPSS2 [26] or CBS-mirSeq [27].
miEAA [20,28]: miEAA is a miRNA enrichment tool. It works conceptually similar to gene set enrichment analysis originally introduced by Subramanian [29]. The tool expects either a list of miRNAs or a set of miRNAs which is then compared to a reference set. In the first case, the unweighted GSEA is performed with an exact computation of p-values [30]. In the second case the hypergeometric distribution is computed to get a p-value. miEAA hosts over 15,000 different functional categories and outputs graphics and tables detailing the pathway enrichment scores. A comprehensive alternative to miEAA is the TAM tool developed by the Cui lab [21].
miRTargetLink [31]: miRTargetLink takes either a single miRNA, a single gene, a set of miRNAs or a set of genes and computes from there the miRNA-target network containing all participants provided by the user. Predicted targets, targets with weak evidence such as microarrays or targets with stronger evidence such as reporter assays can be chosen between. Alternatives to miRTargetLink include miRNet 2.0 [32] or miRViz [33].
miRSwitch [34]: miRSwitch is a tool that takes miRNA expression data and from there computes whether miRNAs perform a shift or switch in terms of the dominant arm. It also offers a comprehensive background knowledge base that, e.g., hosts arm switch events between different tissues. The input to miRSwitch is a miRNA expression matrix, but if only the knowledge base is queried a single miRNA may, of course, also be used as input.
NovoMiRank [35]: Tools such as miRMaster often deliver long sets of potential novel miRNAs. However, many of these are likely false positives that are introduced, e.g., by library prep bias, low quality samples or computational artifacts [36,37]. To this end, we implemented NovoMiRank. The tool takes new miRNA candidates as a gff file and computes for each miRNA the likelihood of being either a true or false positive.

3.3. Qualitative miRNA Data Bases

miRCarta [7]: miRCarta is a data base that has the ambition to store not only all current miRNAs, but also all potential candidates in that it is a very sensitive complementation to the very specific and highly curated miRGeneDB [38]. miRCarta stores miRNAs and miRNA candidates, offers an organism independent nomenclature that is unambiguous and bears many additional features such as targets, miRNA families and others. miRCarta can be queried by using any standard miRNA ID, or a gff3 file can be uploaded and processed. Another alternative to miRCarta and miRGeneDB is the reference database miRBase [4,5,39].
miRSNPdb [10]: miRSNPdb is a database of predicted miRNA-target interactions, in which we have assessed all SNPs which may occur in mature miRNAs and/or their target regions, and have predicted any target gains or losses due to these SNPs. As input, users can provide a miRNA ID, a gene, or a rs ID representing a SNP. Furthermore, users can also upload VCF files as generated in typical DNA sequencing studies to perform a batch analysis. Alternatives are, e.g., miRSNP [40] or PolymiRTS [41]
miRPathDB [42,43,44]: The miRNA target pathway dictionary that has led to the development of miRpathDB is a resource for storing target pathways of miRNAs. In brief, for each miRNA different target sets, strong evidence, weak evidence and predicted targets are pre-computed by GeneTrail [45]. Currently, the database hosts dozens of millions of respective miRNA to target pathway associations. Users can query the database by entering a miRNA identifier. Moreover, sets of miRNAs can be provided and heat maps are generated that show which pathways are targeted by those miRNAs. As a final feature, a maximal coverage analysis via integer linear programming has been introduced. Users determine a maximum number of miRNAs and provide a gene set and the tool computes the minimal number of miRNAs targeting the maximal number of genes provided.
miRATbase: miRATbase is our approach to complement the purely in silico database miRPathDB with fully validated experimental target pathways of single miRNAs. The idea is that each gene targeted by a miRNA and on the respective pathway is validated by a reporter assay approach, in that miRATbase also contains a comprehensive database with results validating miRNA gene interactions by luciferase assays. Of course, there exist substantially larger databases miRTarBase, for example, [46] contains a factor more of miRNA gene interactions. There are two differences however. The first one is that for single miRNAs, we provide a very large numbers of targets that are generated in a highly standardized manner. The average of miRNA gene interactions per manuscript contained in the miRTarBase is only 1.6. The second point is the availability of negative interactions. While only 3% of all reported miRTarBase reporter assays are negative, we include all negative validation experiments. This makes the data sets of high value for researchers that want to validate their tools.

3.4. Quantitative miRNA Data Bases

TissueAtlas [47]: The miRNA tissue atlas is a repository that hosts expression profiles of miRNAs across more than 30 organs and tissues. A unique point is that the organs have largely been collected from the same bodies, excluding inter-individual variations. Researchers can query the atlas by entering any miRNA identifier and get back different expression statistics that can be interactively adjusted. While the TissueAtlas has become our most cited miRNA resource, the current version is still limited to microarray data. The next release will rely on more tissues, more bodies and a much deeper insight in that we use next-generation sequencing as the experimental technique.
CellTypeAtlas [48,49]: Similar to the TissueAtlas we also generated a resource for miRNA expression in different blood cell types. Again, researchers can query the resource by entering any miRNA identifier. In addition to the different cell types, an important factor is the influence of the purification techniques. MiRNA profiles also vary depending on whether positive selection, negative selection or FACS sorting has been used.
ATmiRes [50]: We also developed a resource that investigates miRNA expression patterns in ancient specimens. The most relevant being, of course, miRNA patterns in solid tissue biopsies of the Tyrolean Iceman. While these patterns that still indicate a certain organ specificity are of limited value for actual research questions, they nonetheless demonstrate that selected miRNAs are highly conserved.

3.5. miRNA Helper Tools

miRTaH: In our research, we recognized that one time-consuming task is to design constructs for reporter assays. An analysis of the miRTarBase shows that around 6000 manuscripts report, on average, 1.6 validated target genes by reporter assays. We thus anticipated a need of others for automated reporter assay design. As a result, we developed the miRNA Target Assay Helper miRTaH.
miRBaseConverter: Another time intensive task is to map identifiers between different miRBase versions. We thus developed a tool for the batch conversion. A list of miRNA ids is provided as input, original and desired output version are given and the mapped ids are returned. This is, e.g., of immense help if an experiment with a microarray using V20 of the miRBase has been carried out and a certain tool requires version 18 as input.
miBlast: Finally, another task is to understand whether a small piece of RNA, e.g., predicted from small RNA sequencing results, has already been reported as a miRNA. We thus developed miBlast. Here, you can enter a sequence or a set of sequences and as output you get the respective hits from miRCarta.

3.6. The HumiR Web Presence

As sketched in the introduction our long-term vision is an integrated knowledge base and analysis workflow for human miRNAs. We detail our vision in the fourth section. As a very first step towards this challenging goal, we developed the HumiR web presence available at https://www.ccb.uni-saarland.de/humir/. Here, we collect the tools that we mention in the present work in the respective four categories. It is thought to provide an overview on the available tools for researchers and should serve as an entry point in database queries or for running analysis tasks. To facilitate the selection of the available tools for a given data type we provide all potential input types on top of the HumiR web presence. These include single miRNAs, sets of miRNAs, Lists of miRNAs, GFF files, VCF files and fastq files. The user selects his data type by clicking the icon and all tools that support this input type are highlighted while all other tools are disabled. If single miRNAs are provided as the input type, all data bases and tools besides miEAA, miRMaster and NovoMiRank are available. For fastq, only miRMaster is available, since currently miRMaster is the only tool that works on fastq files directly. In addition, the web presence contains descriptions of the tools and other useful information. The web interface of HumiR is presented in Figure 2.
Table
Table 1. Tool overview.
Table 1. Tool overview.
CategoryToolReferenceOrganismncRNA ClassBrief Description/Link
AnalysismiRMaster[22,23]humanmiRNA, piRNA, tRNA (+5 others)non-coding RNA analysis from fastq sequencing files
https://www.ccb.uni-saarland.de/mirmaster
miEAA[20,28]human, mouse, rat (+7 others)miRNAmiRNA pathway analysis
https://www.ccb.uni-saarland.de/mieaa
miRTarget Link[31]humanmiRNAanalysis of miRNAs and genes in networks
https://www.ccb.uni-saarland.de/mirtargetlink
miRSwitch[34]humanmiRNAanalysis of arm switch and shift events
https://www.ccb.uni-saarland.de/mirswitch
NovoMiRank[35]humanmiRNAranking of novel miRNA candidates
https://www.ccb.uni-saarland.de/novomirank
DatabasemiRCarta[7]all from miRBasemiRNAcomprehensive collection of miRNAs and miRNA candidates
https://www.ccb.uni-saarland.de/mircarta
miRSNPdb[10]humanmiRNAmutations in human miRNAs
https://www.ccb.uni-saarland.de/mirsnp
miRPathDB[42,43,44]human, mousemiRNAtarget pathways and categories of miRNAs
https://mpd.bioinf.uni-sb.de
miRATbaseNAhumanmiRNApositive and negative reporter assay target validations
https://www.ccb.uni-saarland.de/miratbase
TissueAtlas[47]human, ratmiRNAcomprehensive atlas of miRNA expression in multiple organs
https://www.ccb.uni-saarland.de/tissueatlas
CellTypeAtlas[48,49]humanmiRNAcomprehensive atlas of miRNA expression in multiple blood cell types
https://www.ccb.uni-saarland.de/cf
ATmiRes[50]humanmiRNAcomprehensive atlas of miRNA expression in ancient samples
https://www.ccb.uni-saarland.de/atmires
HelpermiRTaHNAallmiRNAa tool for designing miRNA reporter assay experiments
https://www.ccb.uni-saarland.de/mirtah
miRBase Converter[20,28]all from miRBasemiRNAconverts miRNA identifiers between arbitrary miRBase versions
https://www.ccb.uni-saarland.de/mieaa/mirna_version_converter
miBlast[7]all from miRBasemiRNAsearches potential novel miRNAs in the miRCarta database
https://www.ccb.uni-saarland.de/mircarta/miblast

3.7. Dependencies and Workflows

Dependencies and integration between the tools already exists. For example, if a miRTargetLink analysis has been done, the pathway enrichment can be directly instantiated from the results page, making use of the existing API. Another example is the information on target pathways of miRNA candidates from miRCarta. The most recent version of the pathway database notably also contains pre-computed target pathways for all candidates in miRCarta that are not contained in miRBase. Furthermore, if a miRMaster analysis has been completed, users can immediately carry out a miEAA enrichment analysis from the results tab showing the quantification of miRNAs. One last example is the TissueAtlas. For comparison, the user can select data to display from the ancient tissues directly besides the modern tissues by integrating AtmiRes. These represent limited efforts for a more integrated solution using APIs for the integration of the data. A list of potential associations that can be used to build comprehensive workflows is presented in Supplementary Materials Table S1. Here, for 33 combinations, the tools that can be used to build workflows are presented. Notably, other associations that might be reasonable and possible not included in this table exist.
Let us evaluate a typical workflow. A user might have carried out a small RNA sequencing study on case and control samples. The first and straightforward step is to perform an analysis using miRMaster. As result the user gets a list of novel miRNAs. He can upload a respective gff file to NovoMiRank and exclude likely false positives. Next, he can search for the remaining candidates in miRCarta and knows whether they have been reported before. He also can directly extract targets and target pathways of those novel miRNAs. From the set of deregulated miRNAs, he can compute enriched or depleted functional categories directly from the miRMaster results page and having identified promising candidates, he can check which organs these are expressed in. This example workflow is presented in Figure 3. While all these single steps each take a few minutes, they require in total still a relevant amount of time. Further, many copy and paste or download actions are required. This currently limits taking full advantage of the different tools and databases. Nonetheless we provide the results of the analyses showing how much insights can be generated with minimal time. First, we executed miRMaster on the example data set of 70 Alzheimer’s cases and controls and downloaded all results files (117 files and 536 MB data). miRMaster computed 1605 expressed miRNAs from miRBase along with their p-values between Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and control. For the highly significant miRNAs (59 miRNAs; p < 0.005) we performed a standard miEAA analysis using all pathways and categories and downloaded the results. From the far over 10,000 categories, 901 remained significant in the analysis with the three most significant: “Alzheimers Disease Dysregulated” (p = 6.2 × 10−27), “Alzheimers Disease Downregulated” (p = 2.5 × 10−17) and “neuromyelitis optica” (p = 2.1 × 10−14). The next categories were a seed family (GCAAAG; p = 8.6 × 10−8) followed by the category “Alzheimers Disease” from MNDR (p = 3.3 × 10−8). This enrichment clearly validated that we indeed found relevant AD miRNAs in our study, most significantly hsa-miR-1468-5p; hsa-miR-144-5p; hsa-miR-3127-3p; hsa-miR-4781-3p; hsa-miR-6505-3p; hsa-miR-144-3p; hsa-miR-190a-5p; hsa-miR-26b-3p; hsa-miR-101-3p; hsa-miR-628-3p. Those we checked in the miRNA tissue atlas. While most miRNAs were found in the vein or in blood cells, several of those miRNAs were also expressed in the brain or related entities, e.g., miR-144-3p in the dura mater, hsa-miR-190a-5p in the brain and the dura mater, hsa-miR-26b-3p in the arachnoid mater, hsa-miR-101-3p in the brain, arachnoid mater and dura mater or hsa-miR-628-3p in the brain. Respective brain miRNAs might have a higher chance to be functionally related to the disease. A miRTargetLink analysis of the 59 miRNAs identified one core network consisting of 13 miRNAs, 38 target genes and 86 regulatory events between the miRNAs and target genes, among them APP, regulated by the brain miRNA hsa-miR-101-3p and hsa-miR-15a-5p. We next asked how many of the new miRNA candidates from this study have been previously reported and are stored in miRCarta. Of 8982 miRNA candidates reported in that study, 4661 (52%) are actually no new miRNA candidates but are already stored in miRCarta. Finally, we also checked which miRNAs perform arm shifts between case and control. To this end, the miRMaster output was directly transferred to miRSwitch. The analysis identified four miRNAs that vary in their arm usage between AD and control, three with dominant-3p arm (hsa-mir-17, hsa-mir-130b and hsa-mir-3200) and one with dominant -5p arm (hsa-let7d). Using a set of our tools we demonstrated how different tools can be integrated to achieve comprehensive results for a miRNA case-control sequencing study.

4. Outlook: The HumiR Knowledge Base

The previous analysis example demonstrated that a time efficient analysis of human small RNA sequencing data is well feasible with our tool collection. Few examples of direct and deep integration already demonstrate that the process can be further improved. The disadvantage still remains, we had to download and upload again many files between the different tools, calling for a fully integrated knowledge base and analysis resource of human small non-coding RNAs. With each update of a tool or database we now introduce a comprehensive RESTful API. This API describes the interfaces that are sketched in Figure 1 but are so flexible that they can be easily extended. Once available, HumiR will be updated by the integrated version. Our ambition is that users only provide their data. Reasonable workflows for the analysis of these data are automatically generated and proposed to the user. Before they are executed, they can be customized. All results of the different tools are then aggregated in one central place. This facilitates the simplest analyses (entering one single human miRNA and get all information related to this miRNA) up to very complex question such as “Which target pathways of a yet unknown miRNA are differentially expressed between cases and controls?” supported.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/10/11/1576/s1, Table S1: A list of potential associations that can be used to build comprehensive workflows.

Author Contributions

J.S. implemented HumiR’s web presence. F.K. and T.F. contributed to the development and conception of HumiR. E.M. and A.K. developed the concept of HumiR and wrote the manuscript. A.K. performed the analyses. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded by Saarland University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bartel, D.P. Metazoan MicroRNAs. Cell 2018, 173, 20–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, L.; Heikkinen, L.; Wang, C.; Yang, Y.; Sun, H.; Wong, G. Trends in the development of miRNA bioinformatics tools. Brief. Bioinform. 2019, 20, 1836–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Lukasik, A.; Wojcikowski, M.; Zielenkiewicz, P. Tools4miRs—One place to gather all the tools for miRNA analysis. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 2722–2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Griffiths-Jones, S.; Grocock, R.J.; van Dongen, S.; Bateman, A.; Enright, A.J. miRBase: MicroRNA sequences, targets and gene nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, D140–D144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kozomara, A.; Birgaoanu, M.; Griffiths-Jones, S. miRBase: From microRNA sequences to function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D155–D162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fromm, B.; Billipp, T.; Peck, L.E.; Johansen, M.; Tarver, J.E.; King, B.L.; Newcomb, J.M.; Sempere, L.F.; Flatmark, K.; Hovig, E.; et al. A Uniform System for the Annotation of Vertebrate microRNA Genes and the Evolution of the Human microRNAome. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2015, 49, 213–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Backes, C.; Fehlmann, T.; Kern, F.; Kehl, T.; Lenhof, H.P.; Meese, E.; Keller, A. miRCarta: A central repository for collecting miRNA candidates. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D160–D167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Fromm, B.; Keller, A.; Yang, X.; Friedlander, M.R.; Peterson, K.J.; Griffiths-Jones, S. Quo vadis microRNAs? Trends Genet 2020, 36, 461–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alles, J.; Fehlmann, T.; Fischer, U.; Backes, C.; Galata, V.; Minet, M.; Hart, M.; Abu-Halima, M.; Grasser, F.A.; Lenhof, H.P.; et al. An estimate of the total number of true human miRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 3353–3364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Fehlmann, T.; Sahay, S.; Keller, A.; Backes, C. A review of databases predicting the effects of SNPs in miRNA genes or miRNA-binding sites. Brief. Bioinform. 2019, 20, 1011–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Li, Y.; Jin, X.; Wang, Z.; Li, L.; Chen, H.; Lin, X.; Yi, S.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, J. Systematic review of computational methods for identifying miRNA-mediated RNA-RNA crosstalk. Brief. Bioinform. 2019, 20, 1193–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mrozek, D. A review of Cloud computing technologies for comprehensive microRNA analyses. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2020, 88, 107365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kern, F.; Backes, C.; Hirsch, P.; Fehlmann, T.; Hart, M.; Meese, E.; Keller, A. What’s the target: Understanding two decades of in silico microRNA-target prediction. Brief. Bioinform. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Stegmayer, G.; Di Persia, L.E.; Rubiolo, M.; Gerard, M.; Pividori, M.; Yones, C.; Bugnon, L.A.; Rodriguez, T.; Raad, J.; Milone, D.H. Predicting novel microRNA: A comprehensive comparison of machine learning approaches. Brief. Bioinform. 2019, 20, 1607–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Bortolomeazzi, M.; Gaffo, E.; Bortoluzzi, S. A survey of software tools for microRNA discovery and characterization using RNA-seq. Brief. Bioinform. 2019, 20, 918–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zeng, X.; Zhang, X.; Zou, Q. Integrative approaches for predicting microRNA function and prioritizing disease-related microRNA using biological interaction networks. Brief. Bioinform. 2016, 17, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Fan, X.; Kurgan, L. Comprehensive overview and assessment of computational prediction of microRNA targets in animals. Brief. Bioinform. 2015, 16, 780–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Garcia, A.; Dunoyer-Geindre, S.; Fish, R.J.; Neerman-Arbez, M.; Reny, J.L.; Fontana, P. Methods to Investigate miRNA Function: Focus on Platelet Reactivity. Thromb. Haemost. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Le, T.D.; Zhang, J.; Liu, L.; Li, J. Computational methods for identifying miRNA sponge interactions. Brief. Bioinform. 2017, 18, 577–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kern, F.; Fehlmann, T.; Solomon, J.; Schwed, L.; Grammes, N.; Backes, C.; Van Keuren-Jensen, K.; Craig, D.W.; Meese, E.; Keller, A. miEAA 2.0: Integrating multi-species microRNA enrichment analysis and workflow management systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, W521–W528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, J.; Han, X.; Wan, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Fan, R.; Cui, Q.; Zhou, Y. TAM 2.0: Tool for MicroRNA set analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W180–W185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Fehlmann, T.; Backes, C.; Kahraman, M.; Haas, J.; Ludwig, N.; Posch, A.E.; Wurstle, M.L.; Hubenthal, M.; Franke, A.; Meder, B.; et al. Web-based NGS data analysis using miRMaster: A large-scale meta-analysis of human miRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, 8731–8744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fehlmann, T.; Meese, E.; Keller, A. Exploring ncRNAs in Alzheimer’s disease by miRMaster. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 3771–3772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Meistertzheim, M.; Fehlmann, T.; Drews, F.; Pirritano, M.; Gasparoni, G.; Keller, A.; Simon, M. Comparative Analysis of Biochemical Biases by Ligation- and Template-Switch-Based Small RNA Library Preparation Protocols. Clin. Chem. 2019, 65, 1581–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Aparicio-Puerta, E.; Lebron, R.; Rueda, A.; Gomez-Martin, C.; Giannoukakos, S.; Jaspez, D.; Medina, J.M.; Zubkovic, A.; Jurak, I.; Fromm, B.; et al. sRNAbench and sRNAtoolbox 2019: Intuitive fast small RNA profiling and differential expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W530–W535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Wan, C.; Gao, J.; Zhang, H.; Jiang, X.; Zang, Q.; Ban, R.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, Q. CPSS 2.0: A computational platform update for the analysis of small RNA sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2017, 33, 3289–3291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kesharwani, R.K.; Chiesa, M.; Bellazzi, R.; Colombo, G.I. CBS-miRSeq: A comprehensive tool for accurate and extensive analyses of microRNA-sequencing data. Comput. Biol. Med. 2019, 110, 234–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Backes, C.; Khaleeq, Q.T.; Meese, E.; Keller, A. miEAA: MicroRNA enrichment analysis and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W110–W116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Subramanian, A.; Tamayo, P.; Mootha, V.K.; Mukherjee, S.; Ebert, B.L.; Gillette, M.A.; Paulovich, A.; Pomeroy, S.L.; Golub, T.R.; Lander, E.S.; et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 15545–15550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Keller, A.; Backes, C.; Lenhof, H.P. Computation of significance scores of unweighted Gene Set Enrichment Analyses. BMC Bioinform. 2007, 8, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Hamberg, M.; Backes, C.; Fehlmann, T.; Hart, M.; Meder, B.; Meese, E.; Keller, A. MiRTargetLink—miRNAs, Genes and Interaction Networks. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chang, L.; Zhou, G.; Soufan, O.; Xia, J. miRNet 2.0: Network-based visual analytics for miRNA functional analysis and systems biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, W244–W251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Giroux, P.; Bhajun, R.; Segard, S.; Picquenot, C.; Charavay, C.; Desquilles, L.; Pinna, G.; Ginestier, C.; Denis, J.; Cherradi, N.; et al. miRViz: A novel webserver application to visualize and interpret microRNA datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, W252–W261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kern, F.; Amand, J.; Senatorov, I.; Isakova, A.; Backes, C.; Meese, E.; Keller, A.; Fehlmann, T. miRSwitch: Detecting microRNA arm shift and switch events. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, W268–W274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Backes, C.; Meder, B.; Hart, M.; Ludwig, N.; Leidinger, P.; Vogel, B.; Galata, V.; Roth, P.; Menegatti, J.; Grasser, F.; et al. Prioritizing and selecting likely novel miRNAs from NGS data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, e53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Ludwig, N.; Becker, M.; Schumann, T.; Speer, T.; Fehlmann, T.; Keller, A.; Meese, E. Bias in recent miRBase annotations potentially associated with RNA quality issues. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Backes, C.; Sedaghat-Hamedani, F.; Frese, K.; Hart, M.; Ludwig, N.; Meder, B.; Meese, E.; Keller, A. Bias in High-Throughput Analysis of miRNAs and Implications for Biomarker Studies. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 2088–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fromm, B.; Domanska, D.; Hoye, E.; Ovchinnikov, V.; Kang, W.; Aparicio-Puerta, E.; Johansen, M.; Flatmark, K.; Mathelier, A.; Hovig, E.; et al. MirGeneDB 2.0: The metazoan microRNA complement. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, D1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kozomara, A.; Griffiths-Jones, S. miRBase: Annotating high confidence microRNAs using deep sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D68–D73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Liu, C.; Zhang, F.; Li, T.; Lu, M.; Wang, L.; Yue, W.; Zhang, D. MirSNP, a database of polymorphisms altering miRNA target sites, identifies miRNA-related SNPs in GWAS SNPs and eQTLs. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Bhattacharya, A.; Ziebarth, J.D.; Cui, Y. PolymiRTS Database 3.0: Linking polymorphisms in microRNAs and their target sites with human diseases and biological pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D86–D91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kehl, T.; Kern, F.; Backes, C.; Fehlmann, T.; Stockel, D.; Meese, E.; Lenhof, H.P.; Keller, A. miRPathDB 2.0: A novel release of the miRNA Pathway Dictionary Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, D142–D147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Backes, C.; Kehl, T.; Stockel, D.; Fehlmann, T.; Schneider, L.; Meese, E.; Lenhof, H.P.; Keller, A. miRPathDB: A new dictionary on microRNAs and target pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D90–D96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Backes, C.; Meese, E.; Lenhof, H.P.; Keller, A. A dictionary on microRNAs and their putative target pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, 4476–4486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Gerstner, N.; Kehl, T.; Lenhof, K.; Muller, A.; Mayer, C.; Eckhart, L.; Grammes, N.L.; Diener, C.; Hart, M.; Hahn, O.; et al. GeneTrail 3: Advanced high-throughput enrichment analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, W515–W520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Huang, H.Y.; Lin, Y.C.; Li, J.; Huang, K.Y.; Shrestha, S.; Hong, H.C.; Tang, Y.; Chen, Y.G.; Jin, C.N.; Yu, Y.; et al. miRTarBase 2020: Updates to the experimentally validated microRNA-target interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, D148–D154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Ludwig, N.; Leidinger, P.; Becker, K.; Backes, C.; Fehlmann, T.; Pallasch, C.; Rheinheimer, S.; Meder, B.; Stahler, C.; Meese, E.; et al. Distribution of miRNA expression across human tissues. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 3865–3877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Juzenas, S.; Venkatesh, G.; Hubenthal, M.; Hoeppner, M.P.; Du, Z.G.; Paulsen, M.; Rosenstiel, P.; Senger, P.; Hofmann-Apitius, M.; Keller, A.; et al. A comprehensive, cell specific microRNA catalogue of human peripheral blood. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, 9290–9301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Schwarz, E.C.; Backes, C.; Knorck, A.; Ludwig, N.; Leidinger, P.; Hoxha, C.; Schwar, G.; Grossmann, T.; Muller, S.C.; Hart, M.; et al. Deep characterization of blood cell miRNomes by NGS. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016, 73, 3169–3181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Keller, A.; Kreis, S.; Leidinger, P.; Maixner, F.; Ludwig, N.; Backes, C.; Galata, V.; Guerriero, G.; Fehlmann, T.; Franke, A.; et al. miRNAs in Ancient Tissue Specimens of the Tyrolean Iceman. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 793–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Biomolecules 10 01576 g001 550
Figure 1. The four classes of tools as well as the respective tools. The middle of the figure presents the different file types, input or output types for the tools. Orange arrows denote a tool input, e.g., NovoMiRank only works with *.gff files. Orange arrows denote an output of a tool. Theoretically, walks through this graph can be generated, following this scheme: a tool gets a file type as input and produces another filetype as output, which in turn is again used as input for the next tool.
Figure 1. The four classes of tools as well as the respective tools. The middle of the figure presents the different file types, input or output types for the tools. Orange arrows denote a tool input, e.g., NovoMiRank only works with *.gff files. Orange arrows denote an output of a tool. Theoretically, walks through this graph can be generated, following this scheme: a tool gets a file type as input and produces another filetype as output, which in turn is again used as input for the next tool.
Biomolecules 10 01576 g001
Biomolecules 10 01576 g002 550
Figure 2. One walk and workflow. Taking the setup from Figure 1, an example workflow is presented. The thickness of the arrow represents the steps in the workflow. Starting from a fastq file miRMaster is used to predict new miRNAs. From these new miRNAs a *.gff file is extracted and used to score the most likely true positive miRNAs. Those most likely true positive miRNAs can be checked for consistency with miRCarta and the consistent miRNAs from miRCarta can then be checked with respect to their expression profiles, or target pathways can be evaluated. Pathway enrichment using miEAA is also evaluated.
Figure 2. One walk and workflow. Taking the setup from Figure 1, an example workflow is presented. The thickness of the arrow represents the steps in the workflow. Starting from a fastq file miRMaster is used to predict new miRNAs. From these new miRNAs a *.gff file is extracted and used to score the most likely true positive miRNAs. Those most likely true positive miRNAs can be checked for consistency with miRCarta and the consistent miRNAs from miRCarta can then be checked with respect to their expression profiles, or target pathways can be evaluated. Pathway enrichment using miEAA is also evaluated.
Biomolecules 10 01576 g002
Biomolecules 10 01576 g003 550
Figure 3. Web presence of HumiR. Screenshot of the web interface of HumiR. Users can select their input or output file types and all respective tools are enabled while all others are disabled. Although currently the workflows must be executed manually, the aim of HumiR is a fully integrated workflow management of all tools.
Figure 3. Web presence of HumiR. Screenshot of the web interface of HumiR. Users can select their input or output file types and all respective tools are enabled while all others are disabled. Although currently the workflows must be executed manually, the aim of HumiR is a fully integrated workflow management of all tools.
Biomolecules 10 01576 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Solomon, J.; Kern, F.; Fehlmann, T.; Meese, E.; Keller, A. HumiR: Web Services, Tools and Databases for Exploring Human microRNA Data. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1576. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10111576

AMA Style

Solomon J, Kern F, Fehlmann T, Meese E, Keller A. HumiR: Web Services, Tools and Databases for Exploring Human microRNA Data. Biomolecules. 2020; 10(11):1576. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10111576

Chicago/Turabian Style

Solomon, Jeffrey, Fabian Kern, Tobias Fehlmann, Eckart Meese, and Andreas Keller. 2020. "HumiR: Web Services, Tools and Databases for Exploring Human microRNA Data" Biomolecules 10, no. 11: 1576. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10111576

APA Style

Solomon, J., Kern, F., Fehlmann, T., Meese, E., & Keller, A. (2020). HumiR: Web Services, Tools and Databases for Exploring Human microRNA Data. Biomolecules, 10(11), 1576. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10111576

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop