Next Article in Journal
A Role for the Proteasome Alpha2 Subunit N-Tail in Substrate Processing
Next Article in Special Issue
Connecting Dots between Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Depression
Previous Article in Journal
Friend or Foe: Regulation, Downstream Effectors of RRAD in Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mitochondrial Neurodegeneration: Lessons from Drosophila melanogaster Models
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Caenorhabditis elegans as a Model System to Study Human Neurodegenerative Disorders

by
Antonis Roussos
1,†,
Katerina Kitopoulou
1,†,
Fivos Borbolis
1,2 and
Konstantinos Palikaras
1,*
1
Department of Physiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, GR-157 27 Athens, Greece
2
Department of Biology, University of Padova, 35100 Padova, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biomolecules 2023, 13(3), 478; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13030478
Submission received: 21 January 2023 / Revised: 18 February 2023 / Accepted: 1 March 2023 / Published: 5 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mitochondria and Central Nervous System Disorders II)

Abstract

:
In recent years, advances in science and technology have improved our quality of life, enabling us to tackle diseases and increase human life expectancy. However, longevity is accompanied by an accretion in the frequency of age-related neurodegenerative diseases, creating a growing burden, with pervasive social impact for human societies. The cost of managing such chronic disorders and the lack of effective treatments highlight the need to decipher their molecular and genetic underpinnings, in order to discover new therapeutic targets. In this effort, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans serves as a powerful tool to recapitulate several disease-related phenotypes and provides a highly malleable genetic model that allows the implementation of multidisciplinary approaches, in addition to large-scale genetic and pharmacological screens. Its anatomical transparency allows the use of co-expressed fluorescent proteins to track the progress of neurodegeneration. Moreover, the functional conservation of neuronal processes, along with the high homology between nematode and human genomes, render C. elegans extremely suitable for the study of human neurodegenerative disorders. This review describes nematode models used to study neurodegeneration and underscores their contribution in the effort to dissect the molecular basis of human diseases and identify novel gene targets with therapeutic potential.

1. Introduction

Battling human neurodegenerative diseases and their pervasive societal impact is becoming a global priority. Despite their devastating effect on human quality of life and their immense economic impact on healthcare systems, many human neurodegenerative conditions remain incurable and non-preventable. Ageing is universally associated with a marked decrease in neuronal function and higher susceptibility to neurodegeneration. In human populations, this is manifested as an ever-increasing prevalence of devastating neurodegenerative pathologies, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), several ataxias and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Moreover, the steady increase in human lifespan in industrialized nations is exacerbating the prevalence of neurodegeneration-associated disability. Remarkably, neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by common hallmarks, including genomic instability, telomere attrition, epigenetic alterations, protein aggregate accumulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, stem cell exhaustion and autophagy defects, among others [1,2,3].
Caenorhabditis elegans is a soil dwelling, non-parasitic, free-living nematode that feeds on bacteria. The animals are of small size, with adults reaching approximately 1 mm in length and 80 μm in diameter, and can be easily cultivated in laboratory conditions, either on agar plates or in liquid medium, supplemented with Escherichia coli (mainly OP50 strain). C. elegans is primarily a hermaphroditic species, a feature that enables the generation of genetically identical populations and strain preservation, but males also exist with a frequency of <0.2%, allowing the implementation of genetic crosses. Each single hermaphrodite consists of 959 somatic cells and can produce around 300 progenies by self-fertilization, or 1000 upon mating with males (1031 somatic cells) [4,5,6]. Remarkably, the developmental and anatomical features of the nematode’s somatic cells have been extensively studied, and its entire cell lineage has been mapped [4,7]. It is also noteworthy that this animal is transparent at all stages of its life cycle, offering the unique ability for easy visualization, observation and monitoring of physiological and cellular processes by utilizing various microscopy techniques [8]. Additionally, C. elegans has a very short reproductive life cycle, which is completed in 2.5 days at 25 °C and 3.4 days at 20 °C, and its lifespan is about 2–3 weeks [5,6]. Its genome has been completely sequenced and annotated (~97 Mb size) since 1998, and it displays a high degree of conservation with human genes [9]. Overall, these characteristics render this nematode a versatile model organism for studying diverse biological phenomena and human disorders.
C. elegans is used as an animal model in major research areas, including developmental biology, neurobiology, cell biology and ageing, among others. Notably, it is estimated that around 42% of human disease-associated genes have a nematode ortholog, rendering this worm a suitable model to investigate the molecular mechanisms and cellular processes that orchestrate disease development and progression [10,11,12]. The most common experimental approaches to model a pathological condition in C. elegans are (1) to alter the expression levels of a disease-related homolog gene, or (2) to over-express a human isoform in specific nematode tissues, thus resulting in mutant and/or transgenic animals that display phenotypes reminiscent of human pathologies and can be easily studied or used in genetic screens [8,11,12]. Consequently, C. elegans has been established as an important model organism for neuroscience research, enabling the combination of diverse approaches, such as in vivo fluorescent imaging, neuronal activity manipulation and systematic genome-wide genetic screen, towards a common goal [8]. The nematode provides a unique opportunity to study neuronal function, neuronal circuit formation and neurodegeneration, because the entire connectome of its 302 neurons has been reconstructed and well-defined [13,14]. Additionally, its neurons share many functional characteristics with those of higher eukaryotes, including neurotransmitters, receptors, and neuromodulators [15,16,17,18]. Moreover, despite its simple nervous system, C. elegans shows a wide variety of responses that range from a simple aversion to mechanical stimuli to relatively complicated behaviors, such as defecation, thermotolerance, associative learning and memory [19,20,21,22]. Notably, age-associated decline of neuronal function is evolutionarily conserved in organisms as diverse as the nematode and humans, signifying commonalities in the underlying molecular mechanisms. Overall, C. elegans displays several advantages towards understanding the molecular mechanisms that drive the development and progression of age-associated neurodegeneration (Figure 1).
In this review, we present some of the most eminent nematode models of neurodegenerative pathologies and underline their importance in the elucidation of pathophysiological mechanisms and the identification of novel therapeutic intervention strategies against them (Figure 1).

1.1. Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia worldwide and represents a major public health concern [23]. Predictions mention that by 2030, the prevalence of AD will reach 66 million cases, and by 2050, it is indicated that the prevalence of dementia will be tripled worldwide [24]. Although AD is strongly connected with heritability, at a percentage of 60–80%, several lifestyle and environmental factors can contribute to disease development and progression [24,25,26]. AD pathology starts with mild cognitive impairments that gradually evolve into behavioral and neuropsychiatric changes and deficits. Eventually, the progressive cognitive decline and the deterioration of social skills affect the ability of patients to function independently.
At the cellular level, the presence of insoluble amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) plaques and tau-associated neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) in the brain are the most well appreciated pathological features of AD [24,25,26]. Aβ is a small peptide that is generated through the proteolysis of amyloid precursor protein (APP) by β- and γ-secretases. Although recent evidence indicates that the Aβ cascade hypothesis is debatable [27], Aβ plaques play a major role in the progression of the disease [28], while mutations in the APP gene, along with those in presenilin 1 (PSEN1) and presenilin 2 (PSEN2) genes, are linked to early-onset familial forms of AD [29,30]. Tau is a protein that binds to microtubules and stabilizes them, thereby supporting cellular function and viability via vesicle and organelle transportation along neuronal compartments [31,32,33]. Despite its beneficial and pivotal role in neuronal physiology, hyperphosphorylation of tau triggers its aggregation and leads to the formation of NFTs, while both wild type (wt) and mutant isoforms of tau are found to be hyperphosphorylated in AD patients [34,35,36].

1.1.1. Aβ Models

Many C. elegans strains have been created over the years to recapitulate human AD pathology [37,38]. Among these, a variety of transgenic AD models have been generated by expressing human Aβ peptide in specific cell types, such as body wall muscle cells and neurons [39]. Notably, nematodes expressing Aβ1–42 peptide in body wall muscle cells exhibit accumulation of Aβ toxic oligomers and age-dependent progressive paralysis [40]. Likewise, AD models that overexpress human Aβ1–42 specifically in glutamatergic neurons demonstrate progressive, age-dependent neurodegeneration and have been used to validate the functional link between Aβ toxicity and endocytic trafficking [41], while models with pan-neuronal Aβ1–42 expression that demonstrate neuromuscular and age-dependent behavioral defects have contributed to the understanding of AD metabolic pathogenesis by revealing that reduced ATP levels and deficits in electron transport chain (ETC) complexes precede global metabolic failure [42]. Moreover, growing evidence indicates that accumulation of damaged mitochondria is a hallmark of age-dependent neurodegeneration and plays a detrimental role in the pathogenesis of AD [43]. Recent studies indicated that mitophagy, a selective form of autophagy that targets damaged and/or superfluous mitochondria, is impaired in AD patients and relevant animal models, including C. elegans. Indeed, the administration of potent mitophagy inducers, such as nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) boosters or urolithin A (UA), reverses memory impairment and cognitive deficits in Aβ- and tau-expressing C. elegans models [36]. These findings provide new insights into the mechanisms of mitophagy and neurodegenerative diseases and establish C. elegans as a platform for screening mitophagy modulators with therapeutic potential in AD.

1.1.2. APOE Models

Apolipoprotein E (APOE) is thought to be responsible for the transport of cholesterol to neurons via astrocytes [44,45], and its isoforms are characterized as risk factors for AD development [46]. Although APOEe2 isoform is linked with reduced risk, APOEe4 is connected with increased risk of disease development and has been suggested to exacerbate early- and late-onset forms of AD [47], whereas APOEe3 is neutral [48]. The generation and analysis of transgenic C. elegans models expressing human APOE alleles, with or without the presence of Aβ1–42, has provided valuable insights into the involvement of these isoforms in AD pathogenesis [49]. A recent study showed that the co-expression of APOEe2 and Aβ results in the protection of glutamatergic neurons from degeneration and restores mechanosensory behavior. However, APOEe4 and Aβ co-expression does not protect against Aβ neurotoxicity, while the co-expression of APOEe3 has an intermediate phenotype [11]. APOE alleles do not affect neuronal function in the absence of the Aβ, highlighting their neuroprotective function. Indeed, the neuroprotective effects of specific APOE alleles can be modulated by pharmacological and/or genetic manipulations of endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated Ca2+ [49]. Notably, the decreased lifespan of C. elegans strains expressing APOEe4 and Aβ can be rescued by the simultaneous expression of APOEe2 or APOEe3 [49]. In conclusion, C. elegans recapitulates the degeneration phenotypes linked to APOE polymorphisms and, thereby, can be used as a model to uncover new directions in AD research.

1.1.3. APP Models

Aβ is a small peptide produced by the sequential enzymatic processing of APP. The C. elegans genome encodes for a single APP protein (APL-1), which is an ortholog of human APLP1-2 (amyloid beta precursor-like) proteins [50]. Single-copy pan-neuronal expression of human APP, in addition to the endogenous ALP-1 of the nematode, results in neurodegeneration and neurobehavioral dysfunction [51]. Similarly, the pan-neuronal overexpression of endogenous apl-1 gene promotes memory, neurobehavioral and sensory plasticity deficits [52]. Conversely, the knockdown of apl-1 gene causes rapidly progressing paralysis [53]. Investigation of APL-1 in the adult nervous system may provide further insights into the molecular function of APP and the pathways in which it is involved [54]. In conclusion, using C. elegans as a model to study APP activity could lead to a better understanding of its role in disease development and progression.

1.1.4. Presenilin Models

Presenilins (PSENs) are transmembrane proteins found predominantly in the ER and are enriched in compartments that are in contact with mitochondria [55,56]. PSENs are a component of the γ-secretase complex, which plays a key role in the cleavage of APP into Aβ peptides [57]. Although mutations in PSEN1 and PSEN2 lead to early-onset familial AD, their functional consequences are not yet well-defined [58]. In congruence with the mammalian studies, mutation of the PSEN ortholog sel-12 in C. elegans results in the dysregulation of ER Ca2+ homeostasis [58,59]. Particularly, sel-12 mutants have elevated ER–mitochondrial Ca2+ signaling, triggering increased mitochondrial Ca2+ content, which subsequently leads to enhanced mitochondrial superoxide production. Moreover, sel-12 mutants show mitochondrial metabolic defects that promote neurodegeneration [60]. However, the reduction of ER Ca2+ release, mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake or mitochondrial superoxide in mutant worms prevents neurodegeneration and rescues mitochondrial metabolic defects [60]. These findings suggest that mutations in PSEN alter mitochondrial metabolic function via ER–mitochondrial Ca2+ signaling, providing insights for new targets in the effort to tackle neurodegenerative diseases.

1.1.5. Tau Models

The tau protein binds and stabilizes microtubules in order to support the neuronal cytoskeleton network [61]. In AD, tau becomes abnormally phosphorylated, leading to its aggregation and the formation of NFTs [62]. These molecular events mediate the blockage of the neuronal transport system and, thereby, impair synaptic communication between neurons. In C. elegans, ptl-1 encodes for a tau-like protein that has 50% homology to mammalian tau [63]. Loss of ptl-1 triggers incompletely penetrant lethality during embryogenesis, decreases lifespan, impairs touch sensitivity, and causes abnormal morphology in ALM touch neurons, recapitulating some aspects of AD pathology [64,65]. Accumulating evidence indicates that there is some functional conservation between tau and PTL-1, as human tau can rescue touch insensitivity in ptl-1 mutants, while defects caused by tau expression are ameliorated in the absence of endogenous PTL-1 [65]. There are many C. elegans models that overexpress either wt or mutant forms of the human tau protein, with the latter exhibiting greater toxicity [66,67]. Pan-neuronal expression of tau in the nematode leads to the accumulation of insoluble phosphorylated aggregates, age-dependent neurodegeneration, locomotion defects and abnormal motor neuron morphology. Moreover, tau pathology and phenotypes seem to be dose-dependent, since worms with higher levels of pan-neuronal expression display more severe locomotion defects [68,69]. Notably, the pan-neuronal expression of A152T tau mutation, a rare risk factor for frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and AD, results in decreased lifespan, locomotion defects and excessive degeneration of GABAergic neurons in nematodes, mimicking several aspects of AD pathology [70].
Forward and reverse genetic screens in C. elegans have identified sut-1 and sut-2 as mediators of tau neurotoxicity. Indeed, sut-2 overexpression intensifies tau-associated pathology, while sut-2 knockdown protects against tau-induced neuronal dysfunction [71,72]. Likewise, a genome-wide RNAi screen [73] in a nematode model that overexpresses the human tau pan-neuronally, unveiled that the unfolded protein response of the ER (UPRER) is a potential modulator of tau proteostasis [74]. Consequently, expressing XBP-1, the driving transcription factor of UPRER, enhanced the clearance of tau aggregates and improved neuronal survival [74]. Congruently, animals expressing XBP-1 in their neurons or intestine seem to have protection against multiple proteotoxic species, including Aβ1–42 peptide. Further supporting this notion, neuronal expression of XBP-1s rescued the loss of chemotaxis defects in animals that expressed Aβ1–42 pan-neuronally [5,74]. Recent studies demonstrated that neuronal XBP-1s upregulates lysosomal genes and mediates the enhancement of lysosomal acidity and function in the intestine. Taken together, these findings suggest that intestinal lysosomal function is required for increased proteostasis and longevity in the XBP-1 over-expressing nematodes [75].
Emerging findings have shown that there is a strong association between tau pathology and mitochondrial dysfunction, but the chronological order of these phenomena remains elusive [76,77]. A very recent study utilized a nematode model expressing low levels of the wt human tau (PIR3 strain) and underlined that mitochondrial impairment represents an early pathological event in neuronal cells [78]. These animals demonstrate short lifespan, impaired neurotransmission, defective locomotion, abnormal accumulation of tau aggregates and increased neurodegeneration, recapitulating several pathological features of the human tauopathy [77]. Moreover, pan-neuronal tau-expressing nematodes displayed mitochondrial impairment and locomotion deficits during development and ageing [78]. These findings indicate the toxic effects of tau in organelle function and cellular physiology. Although PIR3 nematodes do not accumulate detectable levels of tau aggregates during larval stages, they show increased mitochondrial damage and locomotion defects [78]. Interestingly, chelation of Ca2+ through EGTA rescues pathological phenotypes by increasing mitochondrial membrane potential and improving the motility of the worms. These findings suggest that there is a positive correlation among mitochondrial function, Ca2+ homeostasis and neuronal survival, providing additional mechanistic insights into the primary cause of mitochondrial dysfunction in early stages of tauopathy [78].
In conclusion, C. elegans models used for tauopathies and AD can shed light on the underlying molecular mechanisms of tau pathology and be used as screening platforms to unravel novel genes and compounds leading to the development of novel therapeutic interventions.

2. Parkinson’s Disease

PD is the second most frequent neurodegenerative disorder, affecting around two out of 100 people over 65 years of age, and is most likely caused by interactions among genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors [79,80]. Notably, exposure to toxicants, such as pesticides (rotenone and paraquat), 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+) and neurotoxins such as 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA), has been linked to PD development [81,82]. In particular, rotenone, which acts as an inhibitor of mitochondrial complex I, has already been studied in nematodes [83,84]. Nematodes treated with rotenone displayed loss of dopaminergic neurons, growth and motility defects as well as mitochondrial deficits [83,84]. However, a novel synthesized compound, mitochonic acid 5 (MA-5) derived from plant hormone Indole-3-Acetic Acid (IAA), has been shown to significantly reduce mitochondrial ROS elevation and degeneration of dopaminergic neurons, probably through its interaction with mitofilin as previously shown in mammalian cells [81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91]. Symptoms of PD include motor and non-motor symptoms, such as rest tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity, loss of postural reflexes and depression, and can be mostly traced to the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, which leads to a reduction in dopamine release [79,80]. At the cellular level, PD is characterized by the presence of Lewy bodies containing mostly alpha-synuclein (α-syn) [92]. However, many of the molecular pathways underlying PD pathology remain elusive.

2.1. α-Synuclein Models

The α-syn protein is normally found at presynaptic terminals and the nucleus of neurons, mostly abundant in the brain, and encoded by the PARK1/SNCA locus in humans [93]. Although C. elegans has orthologs of many PARK genes, these do not include PARK1/SNCA [81]. Thus, nematode α-syn models are based on the neuronal or non-neuronal expression of wt or disease-associated forms of the human α-syn. Interestingly, pathological phenotypes of such models are mostly influenced by the expression pattern of α-syn, rather than the type of protein (wt or disease-associated) [94]. Indeed, overexpression of α-syn pan-neuronally or in motor neurons causes age-independent motor defects. In contrast, these defects are not observed when α-syn is expressed only in dopaminergic neurons [94]. However, neuron loss is induced by pan-neuronal or dopaminergic neuron-specific α-syn expression, but not by its expression in motor neurons [94]. Moreover, such heterologous expression of α-syn has been shown to result in the formation of aggregates that resemble inclusions of human PD neurons, thus providing versatile platforms for the discovery of aggregation modulators. For instance, accumulation of both wt and mutant α-syn has been observed in the cell bodies and neurites of dopaminergic neurons in C. elegans [95].
Similarly, age-dependent formation of aggregated α-syn inclusions has been reported in worms expressing human α-syn tagged with yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) in body wall muscle cells [96]. An RNAi screen on this model uncovered 80 genes that cause premature accumulation of inclusions, when knocked down. A significant number of these genes are related to ageing, while 49 out of 80 identified genes have a human ortholog [96]. In this context, it was found that loss of tdo-2 in C. elegans, coding for the tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO-2), leads to lifespan extension, decreased α-syn toxicity and augmented tryptophan levels, indicating tryptophan-dependent toxicity regulation by TDO-2 [97]. Likewise, an RNAi screen in worms expressing α-syn in dopaminergic neurons unveiled five genes with potential neuroprotective roles. Most of them are genes correlated to vesicle trafficking [98]. These results, combined with the neuroprotective effect of TOR-2 (the nematode ortholog of human torsin family 1 member B) and mammalian Rab1A, a GTPase involved in ER-to-Golgi transport, indicate a correlation between impaired ER-to-Golgi vesicular transport and α-syn toxicity [99,100]. Moreover, the same model was used to display that heat preconditioning, mediated by the heat shock transcription factor HSF-1 and the small heat-shock protein HSP-16.1, decreases the loss of dopaminergic neurons [101]. HSP-16.1 interacts with PMR-1 (plasma membrane-related Ca2+—ATPase 1), and thereby, maintains Ca2+ homeostasis and prevents neuronal cell death [101]. Similarly, loss of CPS-6 (EndoG homologue in C. elegans) or depletion of the oleic acid (OA)-generating enzyme stearoyl-CoA-desaturase (SCD) in these animals also leads to decreased dopaminergic neurodegeneration, pointing to novel targets for PD treatment [102,103]. Notably, the mechanisms mentioned above are evolutionarily conserved, as similar results have been obtained from yeast, rodent and human neuronal models [103]. Finally, recent studies showed that intestinal over-expression of α-syn mutants leads to mitochondrial accumulation, excessive fragmentation and energetic stress, as well as increased activation of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPRmt), thus establishing a link between the mitochondrial quality control system and α-syn toxicity [104].

2.2. LRRK2 Models

Leucine rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) is a protein found mainly in the cytoplasm but also interacts with the outer mitochondrial membrane [105]. Mutations in the LRRK2 gene are the most common cause of PD, responsible for 4% of autosomal dominant cases [106]. Although the function of LRRK2 remains unknown, it has been associated with autophagy, cytoskeletal activity and vesicular trafficking [106]. The ortholog of LRRK2 in C. elegans (LRK-1) is localized in the Golgi apparatus and is expressed in muscle cells, neurons and intestinal cells [107,108]. LRK-1 deficient nematodes demonstrate abnormal distribution of synaptic vesicle proteins in neurons and display dopamine-specific behavioral defects [109]. Moreover, these worms exhibit impairments in the trafficking of the synaptic vesicles [110] and suppress phenotypes of PTEN-induced kinase (pink-1) loss-of-function worms [111]. There are also several transgenic nematode models that express normal or mutant forms of the human LRRK2 protein. Animals with pan-neuronal LRRK2 expression have been used to demonstrate that mutant forms of the protein induce greater loss of dopaminergic neurons compared to their wt counterparts [112]. Interestingly, dopaminergic neuronal loss is rescued by kinase inhibitors, suggesting that LRRK2 inhibition could be a possible treatment for PD [112,113]. Congruently, dopaminergic-specific overexpression of LRRK2 human variants has been shown to trigger age-dependent neuronal death, behavioral and locomotion defects, as well as a decrease in dopamine levels [107]. In conclusion, LRRK2 C. elegans models recapitulate several pathological features of PD, highlighting them as ideal platforms to investigate the molecular mechanisms that regulate LRRK2-mediated pathology.

3. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

ALS is a fatal neurodegenerative disease and the most common motor neuron disorder; it shows an incidence between 0.6 and 3.8 per 100,000 persons every year and a prevalence between 4.1 and 8.4 per 100,000 individuals [114]. ALS is characterized by the degeneration of motor neurons in the spinal cord, motor cortex, corticospinal tracts and brainstem, leading to progressive muscular paralysis [115]. The majority of ALS cases are sporadic, with unknown etiology, while only about 10% are familial [116]. C. elegans has been used to investigate genes that play a crucial role in both sporadic and familial forms, including chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9ORF72), superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), TAR DNA-binding protein (TDP43) and fused in sarcoma (FUS).

3.1. C9ORF72 Models

Expansions of GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in the C9ORF72 gene are the most prevalent genetic cause of ALS in Europe and North America [117,118]. Although the mechanism of this expansion is still unknown, a possible explanation is that AUG independent translation of GGGGCC leads to the formation of the respective dipeptide repeats [119]. Indeed, a C. elegans model expressing arginine-containing dipeptides exhibits age-dependent toxicity in muscle cells and motor neurons [120]. Interestingly, the pathogenetic threshold of the repeats that is required for the disease development and progression has not been identified. In most cases, ALS patients have hundreds of repeats [117,121]. Worms with loss-of-function mutations in the C9ORF72 ortholog alfa-1 gene demonstrate age-dependent motility impairments, which eventually result in paralysis and GABAergic stress-dependent neurodegeneration [122]. Moreover, alfa-1 mutants exhibit endocytosis defects that can be partially rescued by the expression of the human wt C9ORF72 protein, revealing a degree of functional conservation [123]. However, since alfa-1 does not carry hexanucleotide repeat expansions, transgenic nematode models are mainly used to study human C9ORF72 toxicity. The use of such models has revealed that the transgenes containing 29 GGGGCC repeats result in early-onset paralysis and lethality, in contrast to those with 9 repeats, which had a less severe impact [124]. Moreover, a forward genetic screening in such transgenic animals revealed two genes that suppress C9ORF72-induced toxicity [124].

3.2. SOD1 Models

The SOD1 enzyme catalyzes the detoxification of superoxide. Although SOD1 mutations account for about 2% of familial ALS cases [125], the underlying toxicity mechanism remains to be uncovered [126]. C. elegans has five genes (sod-1, sod-2, sod-3, sod-4 and sod-5) coding for superoxide dismutases [127]. Nevertheless, SOD1 toxicity has been mainly studied in humanized transgenic worms. In fact, worms expressing normal human SOD1 in neurons and/or in muscles demonstrate a normal phenotype [128,129]. By contrast, muscle-specific or pan-neuronal expression of SOD1 variants in C. elegans leads to ALS-like phenotypes. More specifically, these worms demonstrate increased protein aggregation, impaired locomotion, susceptibility to oxidative stress, synaptic deficiencies, axonal guidance defects and age-dependent paralysis [128,129,130]. The study of various single-copy SOD1 knock-in worm models, which reproduce mutations of ALS patients, revealed that both loss and gain of SOD1 function can promote the pathogenesis of ALS in distinct neurons [131]. Notably, loss-of-function mutations affect glutaminergic neurons, while SOD1 gain of function has a selective impact on cholinergic neurons [131]. Moreover, emerging findings indicate that metformin can protect nematodes expressing mutant SOD1, by activating autophagy, and cause a DAF-16-mediated lifespan extension [132].

3.3. TDP43 Models

TDP43 is a DNA/RNA-binding protein that regulates transcription, alternative splicing and subsequently gene expression [133]. In ALS-affected neurons, TDP43 is hyper-phosphorylated, ubiquitinated, truncated and localized in cytoplasmic inclusion bodies [134,135]. The ortholog of TDP43 in C. elegans is TDP-1, which is expressed in neurons, body wall muscle cells and the pharynx [136]. TDP-1 depleted nematodes demonstrate locomotion, fertility and growth defects, as well as increased sensitivity to oxidative and osmotic stress [136,137]. On the other hand, TDP-1 deficiency ameliorates proteotoxicity in various C. elegans models, including TDP43 and SOD1 expressing animals, and extends the lifespan of the nematode in a DAF-16/FOXO-dependent manner [136,137]. Moreover, the genetic ablation of TDP-1 rescues neuronal degeneration in a C. elegans model that overexpresses mutant TDP43 in GABAergic neurons [138]. Conversely, overexpression of TDP-1 by its native promoter reduces nematode lifespan, while neuronal overexpression of either endogenous TDP-1 or mutant human TDP43 causes uncoordinated locomotion, abnormal synaptic morphology, degeneration of GABAergic motor neurons and age-dependent motor dysfunction [138,139,140], indicating a dose-dependent effect of TDP43 on neuronal function and survival.

3.4. FUS Models

FUS encodes for an RNA/DNA binding protein and is found to be localized in the nuclear compartment and involved in the regulation of various cellular processes [141,142]. On the other hand, ALS-associated mutant FUS is accumulated in the cytoplasm and forms neurotoxic ribonucleoprotein granules and inclusions [143,144]. At the molecular level, mutant FUS triggers dysregulation of RNA processes, such as splicing, transcription and stabilization, leading subsequently to neuronal dysfunction [145,146,147].
The homolog gene of human FUS in C. elegans is fust-1 and has been shown to be involved the regulation of neuronal integrity, synaptic function, lifespan and stress responses [148]. Even so, transgenic C. elegans models expressing human FUS are preferentially used in order to recapitulate ALS phenotypes. As a result, many nematode strains expressing either full length of the wt FUS protein or ALS-associated FUS variants have been generated. Such variants include both missense mutations (e.g., R514G, R521G, R522G, R524S, P525L) and truncations (e.g., FUS513 and FUS501), associated with the varying clinical severity of ALS patients [149]. Although worms expressing wt human FUS pan-neuronally are normal, expression of mutant forms results in the formation of cytoplasmic inclusions, age-dependent motor dysfunction and reduced lifespan [149]. Moreover, C. elegans models expressing different FUS variants display a range of phenotypic severity as seen in humans [150]. Indeed, nematodes expressing mutant FUS (FUSS57Δ) in GABAergic neurons exhibit neuronal dysfunctions, motor deficits and neurodegeneration, symptoms that are reminiscent of human ALS phenotypes [151]. Likewise, transgenic worms expressing an aggregation-prone FUS variant in GABAergic neurons display neurodegeneration, synaptic impairment and paralysis [138], while overexpression of an ALS-associated FUS mutation (FUS501) was recently reported to disrupt neuromuscular junction (NMJ) morphology, resulting in defective neuromuscular transmission and synaptic deformation [152]. Taken together, these findings indicate that C. elegans is an excellent model for biological and medical research to delineate the molecular mechanisms of ALS pathogenesis.

4. Huntington’s Disease

Huntington’s disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor, cognitive and psychiatric problems. HD is caused by a CAG expansion in the huntingtin (HTT) gene, resulting in the production of a mutant HTT protein that carries extended polyglutamine repeats (polyQs) in its N-terminus, triggering neuronal death [153,154]. Although there is no HTT ortholog in C. elegans, several HD models have been generated, carrying variable lengths of polyQ-repeats with or without fusion with fluorescent proteins. These models have been widely used to monitor the accumulation of polyQ tracts upon challenging conditions and during ageing in vivo. Both worms and humans require at least 35 to 40 polyQ repeats for the onset of aggregation, and it has been shown that in both cases the length of polyQ tracts is correlated with the age of onset and the severity of pathological features [155,156]. Particularly, transgenic nematodes expressing polyQ2–Q150 in ASH neurons showed that long polyQ tracts (Htn-Q150) trigger age-dependent protein aggregation and gradual neuronal loss [157]. The expression of HTT N-terminus with 19, 88 or 128Qs in mechanosensory neurons further validated the length-dependent nature of polyQ toxicity, as Q128-expressing animals show axonal abnormalities and increased protein aggregation [158].
C. elegans HD models have been used to identify potential modulators of polyQ aggregation and toxicity. To this end, the cytoprotective effect against polyQ tracks of several naturally occurring and synthetic chemical compounds, such as Rutin and diphenyl diselenide (Ph2Se2), have been identified using the C. elegans HD models. Rutin supplementation promoted polyQ aggregate reduction, neuroprotection and lifespan extension through elevated autophagy, insulin/IGF1-like signaling (IIS) modulation [159] and increased antioxidant activity [160]. Further supporting the beneficial role of autophagy, Htn-Q150- or polyQ40-expressing nematodes displayed aberrant accumulation of the toxic polyQ aggregates, leading subsequently to increased neurodegeneration upon autophagy inhibition [161]. Chronic administration of Ph2Se2 resulted in diminished polyQ aggregation and subsequent neuroprotection via a molecular mechanism that is dependent on DAF-16, HSP-16.2 and SOD-3 to enhance antioxidant capacity and proteostasis [162]. Interestingly, glucose supplementation reduced the misfolded proteins and delayed neurodegeneration in polyQ128-expressing nematodes in a DAF-16 dependent manner [163]. During the last decade, nematode HD models have been used as screening platforms, resulting in the characterization of synthetic and/or natural bioactive agents to tackle polyQ cytotoxicity and neurodegeneration [155,156,157,158,159]. In addition to the neuronal polyQ-expressing nematodes, several C. elegans HD models have been generated to express polyQ peptides fused with fluorescent proteins in body wall muscle cells and, thereby, to assess the rate of polyQ aggregate formation. Such a newly developed HD model expressing polyQ128 tagged with YFP demonstrated increased cytotoxicity, motor deficits and reduced lifespan [164]. Recent studies showed that the polyQ expression in body wall muscle cells mediates increased mitochondrial network fragmentation, indicating an intricate association between polyQ toxicity and mitochondrial dynamics [165,166]. Interestingly, body wall muscle-expressing polyQ nematodes displayed improved locomotion upon knocking down several genes that reduced mitochondrial fragmentation [165,166]. In conclusion, C. elegans is a promising model organism for studying HD and other polyglutamine-based diseases [167].

5. Cockayne Syndrome

Cockayne syndrome (CS) is a rare autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder with an incidence of 2.5 cases per million [168]. The syndrome is characterized by premature ageing, dwarfism, mental retardation, microencephaly and severe photosensitivity. CS is caused by mutations in the ERCC6 and ERCC8 genes coding for Cockayne Syndrome group B protein (CSB) (accounting for 80% of cases) and Cockayne Syndrome group A protein (CSA) (accounting for approximately 20% of the cases), respectively. These genes play a vital role in the transcription coupled (TC) nucleotide excision DNA repair mechanism (NER) by initiating the cascade of events that occurs upon RNA polymerase II stalling and serves to remove helix distorting lesions, such as UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) [169,170,171]. CSA and CSB proteins are evolutionarily conserved across species, and mutations in csa-1 and csb-1, homologues of ERCC6 and ERCC8 human genes, respectively, have already been characterized in C. elegans, with CSA-1 and CSB-1 deficient nematodes displaying developmental growth retardation and lifespan shortening upon UV treatment [172,173,174]. Moreover, loss of csb-1 causes reduced somatic tissue functionality and mechanosensory and neuronal defects along with progressive neurodegeneration upon UV-induced DNA damage [175]. Notably, in both human cells and C. elegans, CSB-1/CSB deficiency promotes accumulation of dysfunctional mitochondria and mitochondrial network hyperfusion, leading to altered energy metabolism [175]. Since C. elegans has many common disease manifestations with human pathology of CS, this model can shed light on the underlying role of DNA damage in age-associated progressive loss of neuronal integrity.
Conversely, CSA-1 seems dispensable for global genome nucleotide excision repair mechanisms (GG-NER), which act throughout the entire genome but target mostly helix distortions [171,176], since UV irradiation of csa-1 mutant worms has no significant effect on germline maintenance, which requires active GG-NER [177]. However, CSA-1 participates in the regulation of TC-NER, which is vital in the transcriptionally hyperactive context of early larval development and cooperates with CSB-1 and XPC-1 to repair UV-induced DNA lesions [177]. As result, csa-1 mutants are more sensitive to UV irradiation during larval stages and exhibit developmental defects and growth arrest, thus providing a powerful system to further explore and define the role of TC-NER during development and ageing [173]. Moreover, these observations indicate the requirement for TC-NER during development, and GG-NER in proliferating cell types is conserved in C. elegans, rendering nematode models suitable for the study of distinct developmental pathologies that are observed in CS patients and the investigation of the differential utilization of the two NER branches during development.

6. Autosomal Dominant Optic Atrophy (ADOA)

Autosomal Dominant Optic Atrophy (ADOA) is a rare genetic neurodegenerative disease that causes progressive and irreversible loss of vision in humans. At the molecular level, ADOA is caused by mutations in optic atrophy 1 (OPA1), an inner mitochondrial membrane protein that is implicated in the process of mitochondrial fusion [178,179,180]. Recent studies utilized C. elegans as an animal model for ADOA to understand the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease. Mutations in the OPA1 homolog gene eat-3, or heterologous expression of mutant human OPA1K301A, lead to the accumulation of autophagosomes and mitochondrial dysfunction, ultimately causing decreased mitochondrial content in axons of GABAergic neurons, neuronal degeneration and impaired defecation cycle. Interestingly, autophagy inhibition restores axonal mitochondrial density and downstream pathological manifestations [178]. Moreover, overexpression of OPA1K301A or EAT-3 deficiency triggered excessive and uncontrolled Ca2+-dependent mitophagy, leading to reduced mitochondrial content in axons, a response that is tightly dependent on Ca2+calcineurin-AMPK signaling cascade [181]. Congruently, Ca2+ chelation restores the defective autophagosomal and mitochondrial distribution in neuronal processes [181]. All of these findings, in combination with the promising results from rodents, underscore that inhibition of excessive autophagy/mitophagy and the modulation of AMPK activity could lead to the development of novel therapeutic interventions to improve or even rescue the visual deficits in ADOA patients. Interestingly, accumulating evidence suggests that mitochondrial dysfunction and mitophagy impairment are hallmarks of multiple neurodegenerative diseases [182], implying that such insights into the molecular mechanism of ADOA pathogenesis and the contribution of autophagy could also apply to the treatment of other neurodegenerative diseases.

7. Concluding Remarks

Despite the benefits of C. elegans for modeling human neurodegenerative diseases, some limitations of this model should be considered. The nematode has a simple nervous system, without myelin sheaths, and lacks many mammalian anatomical features, including a circulatory system and blood–brain barrier [183]. In addition, C. elegans does not have a first-pass liver metabolic pathway or a kidney that filters blood [183]. Although such limitations render C. elegans unable to completely summarize the pathophysiology of human neurodegenerative diseases, nematode models carry various benefits that are useful for this field of research (Figure 2). The ease of laboratory culture and manipulation, along with the short life cycle, make this model cost-effective and less time-consuming compared to others. Moreover, the application of unbiased forward and reverse genetic screening approaches, as well as its high susceptibility to RNAi and transgenesis, establish C. elegans as a malleable experimental tool. An additional advantage of the worm is found in its transparent body structure, which enables the tracking of fluorescent markers in vivo and the assessment of cellular and physiological processes [184]. Therefore, modeling a human disease in C. elegans allows the investigation of complex molecular pathways and the identification of their components. Last but not least, the nematode has no bioethical limitations, thus allowing the scientific community to implement fast-track experimental protocols and interventions that could not be applied to other animal models.
As a result, recent years have seen a significant increase in the use of C. elegans as a high-throughput screening platform for drug discovery [185,186,187]. This approach has led to the identification of several chemical compounds and/or small molecules with potential therapeutic benefits against neurodegenerative disorders [188]. The most renowned examples of such discoveries include the potential of using α-Methyl-α-phenylsuccinimide (MPS) as a treatment for TDP43-related proteinopathies, the identification of neuroleptics as promising anti-ALS compounds that stabilize neuromuscular transmission, and the suggestion that LRKK2 inhibitors can be used as effective drugs against PD [113,189,190]. Likewise, nematode models have been extensively used for the in vivo validation of anti-neurodegenerative properties of drugs, suggested by in vitro assays and/or screens in unicellular organisms. Such a workflow has been successfully applied to uncover the beneficial effect of clioquinol (CQ) on Aβ aggregation and toxicity, as well as in the discovery of SynuClean-D, CNS-11 and CNS-11g, small compounds that inhibit α-syn aggregation and mitigate its toxicity, among other instances [191,192,193]. Moreover, the development of microfluidics devices and the recent integration of machine learning algorithms have provided additional improvements to nematode-based drug discovery methodologies by facilitating the design, execution and analysis of more elaborate screens. Such advanced approaches have led to the identification of novel substances with therapeutic potential, such as the FDA-approved clinical compounds tofranil, dronedarone, bendrofluazide and buspar, which hold promise as anti-HD drugs, enasidenib, ethosuximide, metformin and nitisinone as candidates for late PD treatment, as well as the natural compounds Kaempferol and Rhapontigenin, which induce mitophagy and improve cognition in AD models [194,195,196].
Finally, the powerful genetics of C. elegans have contributed immensely to the unveiling of molecular mechanisms that underly the activity of candidate drugs, as well as to the discovery of key endogenous molecules and processes that are involved in disease pathogenesis and consist of potential targets for therapeutic interventions. Such discoveries include the function of UPRER as a modulator of tau aggregation, the participation of SUT-1 and SUT-2 in the activation of tau, the protective effect of the glycolytic enzyme GPI against α-syn toxicity, the tendency of dopamine to exacerbate α-syn induced neurotoxicity, as well as the nature of autophagy and mitophagy as substantial factors in the pathogenesis of PD and other neurodegenerative disorders [72,73,74,98,197,198,199,200,201]. Overall, the aforementioned advantages establish C. elegans as a powerful and versatile preclinical model, with a great contribution to the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of age-associated neurodegeneration.

Author Contributions

A.R., K.K. and K.P. prepared the original draft of the manuscript. F.B. and K.P. revised and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by grants from the Fondation Santé (18376) and the European Research Council (GA 101077374—SynaptoMitophagy).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of numerous investigators that we could not include in this review, owing to space limitations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hou, Y.; Dan, X.; Babbar, M.; Wei, Y.; Hasselbalch, S.G.; Croteau, D.L.; Bohr, V.A. Ageing as a risk factor for neurodegenerative disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2019, 15, 565–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Aman, Y.; Schmauck-Medina, T.; Hansen, M.; Morimoto, R.I.; Simon, A.K.; Bjedov, I.; Palikaras, K.; Simonsen, A.; Johansen, T.; Tavernarakis, N.; et al. Autophagy in healthy aging and disease. Nat. Aging 2021, 1, 634–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mkrtchyan, G.V.; Abdelmohsen, K.; Andreux, P.; Bagdonaite, I.; Barzilai, N.; Brunak, S.; Cabreiro, F.; de Cabo, R.; Campisi, J.; Cuervo, A.M.; et al. ARDD 2020: From aging mechanisms to interventions. Aging 2020, 12, 24484–24503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sulston, J.E.; Schierenberg, E.; White, J.G.; Thomson, J.N. The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 1983, 100, 64–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Markaki, M.; Tavernarakis, N. Caenorhabditis elegans as a model system for human diseases. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2020, 63, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Frezal, L.; Felix, M.A. C. elegans outside the Petri dish. eLife 2015, 4, e05849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sulston, J. Neuronal Cell Lineages in the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 1983, 48, 443–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kaletta, T.; Hengartner, M. Finding function in novel targets: C. elegans as a model organism. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006, 5, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. The, C. elegans Sequencing Consortium. Genome Sequence of the Nematode C. elegans: A Platform for Investigating Biology. Science 1998, 282, 2012–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Culetto, E.; Sattelle, D.B. A role for Caenorhabditis elegans in understanding the function and interactions of human disease genes. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2000, 9, 869–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Caldwell, K.A.; Willicott, C.W.; Caldwell, G.A. Modeling neurodegeneration in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dis. Model. Mech. 2020, 13, dmm046110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, S.; Li, F.; Zhou, T.; Wang, G.; Li, Z. Caenorhabditis elegans as a Useful Model for Studying Aging Mutations. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 554994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cook, S.J.; Jarrell, T.A.; Brittin, C.A.; Wang, Y.; Bloniarz, A.E.; Yakovlev, M.A.; Nguyen, K.C.Q.; Tang, L.T.-H.; Bayer, E.A.; Duerr, J.S.; et al. Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes. Nature 2019, 571, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. White, J.G.; Southgate, E.; Thomson, J.N.; Brenner, S. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1986, 314, 1–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bargmann, C.I.; Marder, E. From the connectome to brain function. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kavalali, E.T.; Jorgensen, E.M. Visualizing presynaptic function. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 17, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vashlishan, A.B.; Madison, J.M.; Dybbs, M.; Bai, J.; Sieburth, D.; Ch’Ng, Q.; Tavazoie, M.; Kaplan, J.M. An RNAi Screen Identifies Genes that Regulate GABA Synapses. Neuron 2008, 58, 346–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Flavell, S.W.; Pokala, N.; Macosko, E.Z.; Albrecht, D.R.; Larsch, J.; Bargmann, C.I. Serotonin and the Neuropeptide PDF Initiate and Extend Opposing Behavioral States in C. elegans. Cell 2013, 154, 1023–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Kobayashi, K.; Nakano, S.; Amano, M.; Tsuboi, D.; Nishioka, T.; Ikeda, S.; Yokoyama, G.; Kaibuchi, K.; Mori, I. Single-Cell Memory Regulates a Neural Circuit for Sensory Behavior. Cell Rep. 2016, 14, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Richmond, J.E.; Jorgensen, E.M. One GABA and two acetylcholine receptors function at the C. elegans neuromuscular junction. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2, 791–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schuske, K.; Beg, A.A.; Jorgensen, E.M. The GABA nervous system in C. elegans. Trends Neurosci. 2004, 27, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Arey, R.N.; Kaletsky, R.; Murphy, C.T. Nervous system-wide profiling of presynaptic mRNAs reveals regulators of associative memory. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 20314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Ballard, C.; Gauthier, S.; Corbett, A.; Brayne, C.; Aarsland, D.; Jones, E. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 2011, 377, 1019–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Scheltens, P.; De Strooper, B.; Kivipelto, M.; Holstege, H.; Chételat, G.; Teunissen, C.E.; Cummings, J.; van der Flier, W.M. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 2021, 397, 1577–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gatz, M.; Reynolds, C.A.; Fratiglioni, L.; Johansson, B.; Mortimer, J.A.; Berg, S.; Fiske, A.; Pedersen, N.L. Role of Genes and Environments for Explaining Alzheimer Disease. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2006, 63, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. van der Lee, S.J.; Wolters, F.J.; Ikram, M.K.; Hofman, A.; Ikram, M.A.; Amin, N.; van Duijn, C.M. The effect of APOE and other common genetic variants on the onset of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia: A community-based cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2018, 17, 434–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gouras, G.K.; Olsson, T.T.; Hansson, O. β-amyloid Peptides and Amyloid Plaques in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurotherapeutics 2014, 12, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Walker, L.C. Abeta Plaques. Free Neuropathol. 2020, 1, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kabir, T.; Uddin, S.; Setu, J.R.; Ashraf, G.; Bin-Jumah, M.N.; Abdel-Daim, M. Exploring the Role of PSEN Mutations in the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurotox. Res. 2020, 38, 833–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Goate, A.; Chartier-Harlin, M.-C.; Mullan, M.; Brown, J.; Crawford, F.; Fidani, L.; Giuffra, L.; Haynes, A.; Irving, N.; James, L.; et al. Segregation of a missense mutation in the amyloid precursor protein gene with familial Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 1991, 349, 704–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liang, S.-Y.; Wang, Z.-T.; Tan, L.; Yu, J.-T. Tau Toxicity in Neurodegeneration. Mol. Neurobiol. 2022, 59, 3617–3634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, Y.; Mandelkow, E. Tau in physiology and pathology. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2015, 17, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kent, S.A.; Spires-Jones, T.L.; Durrant, C.S. The physiological roles of tau and Aβ: Implications for Alzheimer’s disease pathology and therapeutics. Acta Neuropathol. 2020, 140, 417–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Medeiros, R.; Baglietto-Vargas, D.; LaFerla, F.M. The Role of Tau in Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2010, 17, 514–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. McHatton, M. A theory for timely teaching. Prof. Inferm. 1986, 39, 41–47. [Google Scholar]
  36. Fang, E.F.; Hou, Y.; Palikaras, K.; Adriaanse, B.A.; Kerr, J.S.; Yang, B.; Lautrup, S.; Hasan-Olive, M.M.; Caponio, D.; Dan, X.; et al. Mitophagy inhibits amyloid-β and tau pathology and reverses cognitive deficits in models of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 2019, 22, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Van Pelt, K.M.; Truttmann, M.C. Caenorhabditis elegans as a model system for studying aging-associated neurodegenerative diseases. Transl. Med. Aging 2020, 4, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Alvarez, J.; Alvarez-Illera, P.; Santo-Domingo, J.; Fonteriz, R.I.; Montero, M. Modeling Alzheimer’s Disease in Caenorhabditis elegans. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Griffin, E.F.; Caldwell, K.A.; Caldwell, G.A. Genetic and Pharmacological Discovery for Alzheimer’s Disease Using Caenorhabditis elegans. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2017, 8, 2596–2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Link, C.D. Expression of human beta-amyloid peptide in transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 9368–9372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Treusch, S.; Hamamichi, S.; Goodman, J.L.; Matlack, K.E.S.; Chung, C.Y.; Baru, V.; Shulman, J.M.; Parrado, A.; Bevis, B.J.; Valastyan, J.S.; et al. Functional Links Between Aβ Toxicity, Endocytic Trafficking, and Alzheimer’s Disease Risk Factors in Yeast. Science 2011, 334, 1241–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Fong, S.; Teo, E.; Ng, L.F.; Chen, C.-B.; Lakshmanan, L.N.; Tsoi, S.Y.; Moore, P.K.; Inoue, T.; Halliwell, B.; Gruber, J. Energy crisis precedes global metabolic failure in a novel Caenorhabditis elegans Alzheimer Disease model. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Wang, W.; Zhao, F.; Ma, X.; Perry, G.; Zhu, X. Mitochondria dysfunction in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease: Recent advances. Mol. Neurodegener. 2020, 15, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, H.; Kulas, J.A.; Wang, C.; Holtzman, D.M.; Ferris, H.A.; Hansen, S.B. Regulation of beta-amyloid production in neurons by astrocyte-derived cholesterol. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2102191118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhao, J.; Fu, Y.; Yamazaki, Y.; Ren, Y.; Davis, M.D.; Liu, C.-C.; Lu, W.; Wang, X.; Chen, K.; Cherukuri, Y.; et al. APOE4 exacerbates synapse loss and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease patient iPSC-derived cerebral organoids. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Serrano-Pozo, A.; Das, S.; Hyman, B.T. APOE and Alzheimer’s disease: Advances in genetics, pathophysiology, and therapeutic approaches. Lancet Neurol. 2021, 20, 68–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Asaro, A.; Carlo-Spiewok, A.; Malik, A.R.; Rothe, M.; Schipke, C.G.; Peters, O.; Heeren, J.; Willnow, T.E. Apolipoprotein E4 disrupts the neuroprotective action of sortilin in neuronal lipid metabolism and endocannabinoid signaling. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2020, 16, 1248–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Spinney, L. Alzheimer’s disease: The forgetting gene. Nature 2014, 510, 26–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Griffin, E.F.; Scopel, S.E.; Stephen, C.A.; Holzhauer, A.C.; Vaji, M.A.; Tuckey, R.A.; Berkowitz, L.A.; Caldwell, K.A.; Caldwell, G.A. ApoE-associated modulation of neuroprotection from Aβ-mediated neurodegeneration in transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans. Dis. Model. Mech. 2019, 12, dmm037218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Hornsten, A.; Lieberthal, J.; Fadia, S.; Malins, R.; Ha, L.; Xu, X.; Daigle, I.; Markowitz, M.; O’Connor, G.; Plasterk, R.; et al. APL-1, a Caenorhabditis elegans protein related to the human β-amyloid precursor protein, is essential for viability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 1971–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Yi, B.; Sahn, J.J.; Ardestani, P.M.; Evans, A.K.; Scott, L.L.; Chan, J.Z.; Iyer, S.; Crisp, A.; Zuniga, G.; Pierce, J.T.; et al. Small molecule modulator of sigma 2 receptor is neuroprotective and reduces cognitive deficits and neuroinflammation in experimental models of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurochem. 2017, 140, 561–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Ewald, C.Y.; Cheng, R.; Tolen, L.; Shah, V.; Gillani, A.; Nasrin, A.; Li, C. Pan-Neuronal Expression of APL-1, an APP-Related Protein, Disrupts Olfactory, Gustatory, and Touch Plasticity in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 10156–10169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Wiese, M.; Antebi, A.; Zheng, H. Intracellular Trafficking and Synaptic Function of APL-1 in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e12790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Ewald, C.Y.; Li, C. Caenorhabditis elegans as a model organism to study APP function. Exp. Brain Res. 2011, 217, 397–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Bezprozvanny, I.; Mattson, M.P. Neuronal calcium mishandling and the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Neurosci. 2008, 31, 454–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Area-Gomez, E.; de Groof, A.J.C.; Boldogh, I.; Bird, T.D.; Gibson, G.E.; Koehler, C.M.; Yu, W.H.; Duff, K.E.; Yaffe, M.P.; Pon, L.A.; et al. Presenilins Are Enriched in Endoplasmic Reticulum Membranes Associated with Mitochondria. Am. J. Pathol. 2009, 175, 1810–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Beel, A.J.; Sanders, C.R. Substrate specificity of γ-secretase and other intramembrane proteases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2008, 65, 1311–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Sarasija, S.; Norman, K.R. A γ-Secretase Independent Role for Presenilin in Calcium Homeostasis Impacts Mitochondrial Function and Morphology in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 2015, 201, 1453–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Levitan, D.; Greenwald, I. Facilitation of lin-12-mediated signalling by sel-12, a Caenorhabditis elegans S182 Alzheimer’s disease gene. Nature 1995, 377, 351–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sarasija, S.; Laboy, J.T.; Ashkavand, Z.; Bonner, J.; Tang, Y.; Norman, K.R. Presenilin mutations deregulate mitochondrial Ca2+ homeostasis and metabolic activity causing neurodegeneration in Caenorhabditis elegans. eLife 2018, 7, 33052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Weingarten, M.D.; Lockwood, A.H.; Hwo, S.Y.; Kirschner, M.W. A protein factor essential for microtubule assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1975, 72, 1858–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Naseri, N.N.; Wang, H.; Guo, J.; Sharma, M.; Luo, W. The complexity of tau in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 2019, 705, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pir, G.J.; Choudhary, B.; Mandelkow, E. Caenorhabditis elegans models of tauopathy. FASEB J. 2017, 31, 5137–5148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Liang, J.J.H.; McKinnon, I.A.; Rankin, C.H. The contribution of C. elegans neurogenetics to understanding neurodegenerative diseases. J. Neurogenet. 2020, 34, 527–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chew, Y.L.; Fan, X.; Götz, J.; Nicholas, H.R. PTL-1 regulates neuronal integrity and lifespan in C. elegans. J. Cell Sci. 2013, 126, 2079–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Kraemer, B.C.; Zhang, B.; Leverenz, J.B.; Thomas, J.H.; Trojanowski, J.Q.; Schellenberg, G.D. Neurodegeneration and defective neurotransmission in a Caenorhabditis elegans model of tauopathy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 9980–9985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Brandt, R.; Gergou, A.; Wacker, I.; Fath, T.; Hutter, H. A Caenorhabditis elegans model of tau hyperphosphorylation: Induction of developmental defects by transgenic overexpression of Alzheimer’s disease-like modified tau. Neurobiol. Aging 2009, 30, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Guha, S.; Fischer, S.; Johnson, G.V.W.; Nehrke, K. Tauopathy-associated tau modifications selectively impact neurodegeneration and mitophagy in a novel C. elegans single-copy transgenic model. Mol. Neurodegener. 2020, 15, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Miyasaka, T.; Shinzaki, Y.; Yoshimura, S.; Yoshina, S.; Kage-Nakadai, E.; Mitani, S.; Ihara, Y. Imbalanced Expression of Tau and Tubulin Induces Neuronal Dysfunction in C. elegans Models of Tauopathy. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Pir, G.J.; Choudhary, B.; Mandelkow, E.; Mandelkow, E.-M. Tau mutant A152T, a risk factor for FTD/PSP, induces neuronal dysfunction and reduced lifespan independently of aggregation in a C. elegans Tauopathy model. Mol. Neurodegener. 2016, 11, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Guthrie, C.R.; Greenup, L.; Leverenz, J.B.; Kraemer, B.C. MSUT2 is a determinant of susceptibility to tau neurotoxicity. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011, 20, 1989–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Guthrie, C.R.; Schellenberg, G.D.; Kraemer, B.C. SUT-2 potentiates tau-induced neurotoxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009, 18, 1825–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Kraemer, B.C.; Burgess, J.K.; Chen, J.H.; Thomas, J.H.; Schellenberg, G.D. Molecular pathways that influence human tau-induced pathology in Caenorhabditis elegans. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2006, 15, 1483–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Waldherr, S.M.; Strovas, T.J.; Vadset, T.A.; Liachko, N.F.; Kraemer, B.C. Constitutive XBP-1s-mediated activation of the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response protects against pathological tau. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Imanikia, S.; Özbey, N.P.; Krueger, C.; Casanueva, M.O.; Taylor, R.C. Neuronal XBP-1 Activates Intestinal Lysosomes to Improve Proteostasis in C. elegans. Curr. Biol. 2019, 29, 2322–2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Cheng, Y.; Bai, F. The Association of Tau with Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Schulz, K.L.; Eckert, A.; Rhein, V.; Mai, S.; Haase, W.; Reichert, A.S.; Jendrach, M.; Müller, W.E.; Leuner, K. A New Link to Mitochondrial Impairment in Tauopathies. Mol. Neurobiol. 2012, 46, 205–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Palikaras, K.; Achanta, K.; Choi, S.; Akbari, M.; Bohr, V.A. Alteration of mitochondrial homeostasis is an early event in a C. elegans model of human tauopathy. Aging 2021, 13, 23876–23894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Poewe, W.; Seppi, K.; Tanner, C.M.; Halliday, G.M.; Brundin, P.; Volkmann, J.; Schrag, A.E.; Lang, A.E. Parkinson disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2017, 3, 17013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Jankovic, J.; Tan, E.K. Parkinson’s disease: Etiopathogenesis and treatment. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2020, 91, 795–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cooper, J.F.; Van Raamsdonk, J.M. Modeling Parkinson’s Disease in C. elegans. J. Park. Dis. 2018, 8, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Johnson, M.E.; Bobrovskaya, L. An update on the rotenone models of Parkinson’s disease: Their ability to reproduce the features of clinical disease and model gene–environment interactions. Neurotoxicology 2015, 46, 101–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Mocko, J.B.; Kern, A.; Moosmann, B.; Behl, C.; Hajieva, P. Phenothiazines interfere with dopaminergic neurodegeneration in Caenorhabditis elegans models of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2010, 40, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhou, S.; Wang, Z.; Klaunig, J.E. Caenorhabditis elegans neuron degeneration and mitochondrial suppression caused by selected environmental chemicals. Int. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2013, 4, 191–200. [Google Scholar]
  85. Sherer, T.; Betarbet, R.; Testa, C.M.; Seo, B.B.; Richardson, J.R.; Kim, J.H.; Miller, G.W.; Yagi, T.; Matsuno-Yagi, A.; Greenamyre, J.T. Mechanism of Toxicity in Rotenone Models of Parkinson’s Disease. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 10756–10764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Van Laar, V.S.; Berman, S.B.; Hastings, T.G. Mic60/mitofilin overexpression alters mitochondrial dynamics and attenuates vulnerability of dopaminergic cells to dopamine and rotenone. Neurobiol. Dis. 2016, 91, 247–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Aliagan, A.D.I.; Ahwazi, M.D.; Tombo, N.; Feng, Y.; Bopassa, J.C. Parkin interacts with Mitofilin to increase dopaminergic neuron death in response to Parkinson’s disease-related stressors. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2020, 12, 7542–7564. [Google Scholar]
  88. Wu, X.; Nagasawa, S.; Muto, K.; Ueda, M.; Suzuki, C.; Abe, T.; Higashitani, A. Mitochonic Acid 5 Improves Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Parkinson’s Disease Model of Caenorhabditis elegans. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Suzuki, T.; Yamaguchi, H.; Kikusato, M.; Hashizume, O.; Nagatoishi, S.; Matsuo, A.; Sato, T.; Kudo, T.; Matsuhashi, T.; Murayama, K.; et al. Mitochonic Acid 5 Binds Mitochondria and Ameliorates Renal Tubular and Cardiac Myocyte Damage. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2015, 27, 1925–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Matsuhashi, T.; Sato, T.; Kanno, S.-I.; Suzuki, T.; Matsuo, A.; Oba, Y.; Kikusato, M.; Ogasawara, E.; Kudo, T.; Suzuki, K.; et al. Mitochonic Acid 5 (MA-5) Facilitates ATP Synthase Oligomerization and Cell Survival in Various Mitochondrial Diseases. EBioMedicine 2017, 20, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Suzuki, T.; Yamaguchi, H.; Kikusato, M.; Matsuhashi, T.; Matsuo, A.; Sato, T.; Oba, Y.; Watanabe, S.; Minaki, D.; Saigusa, D.; et al. Mitochonic Acid 5 (MA-5), a Derivative of the Plant Hormone Indole-3-Acetic Acid, Improves Survival of Fibroblasts from Patients with Mitochondrial Diseases. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2015, 236, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Spillantini, M.G.; Schmidt, M.L.; Lee, V.M.-Y.; Trojanowski, J.Q.; Jakes, R.; Goedert, M. α-Synuclein in Lewy bodies. Nature 1997, 388, 839–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Goedert, M. Alpha-synuclein and neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2001, 2, 492–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lakso, M.; Vartiainen, S.; Moilanen, A.-M.; Sirviö, J.; Thomas, J.H.; Nass, R.; Blakely, R.D.; Wong, G. Dopaminergic neuronal loss and motor deficits in Caenorhabditis elegans overexpressing human α-synuclein. J. Neurochem. 2004, 86, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Kuwahara, T.; Koyama, A.; Gengyo-Ando, K.; Masuda, M.; Kowa, H.; Tsunoda, M.; Mitani, S.; Iwatsubo, T. Familial Parkinson Mutant α-Synuclein Causes Dopamine Neuron Dysfunction in Transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. van Ham, T.J.; Thijssen, K.L.; Breitling, R.; Hofstra, R.M.; Plasterk, R.H.A.; Nollen, E.A.A. C. elegans Model Identifies Genetic Modifiers of α-Synuclein Inclusion Formation during Aging. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4, e1000027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. van der Goot, A.T.; Zhu, W.; Vázquez-Manrique, R.P.; Seinstra, R.I.; Dettmer, K.; Michels, H.; Farina, F.; Krijnen, J.; Melki, R.; Buijsman, R.C.; et al. Delaying aging and the aging-associated decline in protein homeostasis by inhibition of tryptophan degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 14912–14917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Hamamichi, S.; Rivas, R.N.; Knight, A.L.; Cao, S.; Caldwell, K.A.; Caldwell, G.A. Hypothesis-based RNAi screening identifies neuroprotective genes in a Parkinson’s disease model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 728–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Cao, S.; Gelwix, C.C.; Caldwell, K.A.; Caldwell, G.A. Torsin-Mediated Protection from Cellular Stress in the Dopaminergic Neurons of Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 3801–3812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Cooper, A.A.; Gitler, A.D.; Cashikar, A.; Haynes, C.M.; Hill, K.J.; Bhullar, B.; Liu, K.; Xu, K.; Strathearn, K.E.; Liu, F.; et al. α-Synuclein Blocks ER-Golgi Traffic and Rab1 Rescues Neuron Loss in Parkinson’s Models. Science 2006, 313, 324–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Kourtis, N.; Nikoletopoulou, V.; Tavernarakis, N. Small heat-shock proteins protect from heat-stroke-associated neurodegeneration. Nature 2012, 490, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Büttner, S.; Habernig, L.; Broeskamp, F.; Ruli, D.; Vögtle, F.N.; Vlachos, M.; Macchi, F.; Küttner, V.; Carmona-Gutierrez, D.; Eisenberg, T.; et al. Endonuclease G mediates α-synuclein cytotoxicity during Parkinson’s disease. EMBO J. 2013, 32, 3041–3054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Fanning, S.; Haque, A.; Imberdis, T.; Baru, V.; Barrasa, M.I.; Nuber, S.; Termine, D.; Ramalingam, N.; Ho, G.P.H.; Noble, T.; et al. Lipidomic Analysis of α-Synuclein Neurotoxicity Identifies Stearoyl CoA Desaturase as a Target for Parkinson Treatment. Mol. Cell 2019, 73, 1001–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Martinez, B.A.; Petersen, D.A.; Gaeta, A.L.; Stanley, S.P.; Caldwell, G.A.; Caldwell, K.A. Dysregulation of the Mitochondrial Unfolded Protein Response Induces Non-Apoptotic Dopaminergic Neurodegeneration in C. elegans Models of Parkinson’s Disease. J. Neurosci. 2017, 37, 11085–11100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Gandhi, P.N.; Chen, S.G.; Wilson-Delfosse, A.L. Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2): A key player in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurosci. Res. 2009, 87, 1283–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Xiong, Y.; Dawson, T.M.; Dawson, V.L. Models of LRRK2-Associated Parkinson’s Disease. Adv. Neurobiol. 2017, 14, 163–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Yao, C.; El Khoury, R.; Wang, W.; Byrd, T.A.; Pehek, E.A.; Thacker, C.; Zhu, X.; Smith, M.A.; Wilson-Delfosse, A.L.; Chen, S.G. LRRK2-mediated neurodegeneration and dysfunction of dopaminergic neurons in a Caenorhabditis elegans model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2010, 40, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Fukuzono, T.; Pastuhov, S.I.; Fukushima, O.; Li, C.; Hattori, A.; Iemura, S.-I.; Natsume, T.; Shibuya, H.; Hanafusa, H.; Matsumoto, K.; et al. Chaperone complex BAG2-HSC70 regulates localization of Caenorhabditis elegans leucine-rich repeat kinase LRK-1 to the Golgi. Genes Cells 2016, 21, 311–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Sakaguchi-Nakashima, A.; Meir, J.Y.; Jin, Y.; Matsumoto, K.; Hisamoto, N. LRK-1, a C. elegans PARK8-Related Kinase, Regulates Axonal-Dendritic Polarity of SV Proteins. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17, 592–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Choudhary, B.; Kamak, M.; Ratnakaran, N.; Kumar, J.; Awasthi, A.; Li, C.; Nguyen, K.; Matsumoto, K.; Hisamoto, N.; Koushika, S.P. UNC-16/JIP3 regulates early events in synaptic vesicle protein trafficking via LRK-1/LRRK2 and AP complexes. PLoS Genet. 2017, 13, e1007100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Sämann, J.; Hegermann, J.; von Gromoff, E.; Eimer, S.; Baumeister, R.; Schmidt, E. Caenorhabditits elegans LRK-1 and PINK-1 Act Antagonistically in Stress Response and Neurite Outgrowth. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 16482–16491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Saha, S.; Guillily, M.D.; Ferree, A.; Lanceta, J.; Chan, D.; Ghosh, J.; Hsu, C.H.; Segal, L.; Raghavan, K.; Matsumoto, K.; et al. LRRK2 Modulates Vulnerability to Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29, 9210–9218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Liu, Z.; Hamamichi, S.; Lee, B.D.; Yang, D.; Ray, A.; Caldwell, G.A.; Caldwell, K.A.; Dawson, T.M.; Smith, W.W.; Dawson, V.L. Inhibitors of LRRK2 kinase attenuate neurodegeneration and Parkinson-like phenotypes in Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila Parkinson’s disease models. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011, 20, 3933–3942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Longinetti, E.; Fang, F. Epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: An update of recent literature. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2019, 32, 771–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Wijesekera, L.C.; Leigh, P.N. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2009, 4, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Turner, M.R.; Hardiman, O.; Benatar, M.; Brooks, B.R.; Chio, A.; de Carvalho, M.; Ince, P.G.; Lin, C.; Miller, R.G.; Mitsumoto, H.; et al. Controversies and priorities in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2013, 12, 310–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. DeJesus-Hernandez, M.; Mackenzie, I.R.; Boeve, B.F.; Boxer, A.L.; Baker, M.; Rutherford, N.J.; Nicholson, A.M.; Finch, N.A.; Flynn, H.; Adamson, J.; et al. Expanded GGGGCC Hexanucleotide Repeat in Noncoding Region of C9ORF72 Causes Chromosome 9p-Linked FTD and ALS. Neuron 2011, 72, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Renton, A.E.; Majounie, E.; Waite, A.; Simon-Saánchez, J.; Rollinson, S.; Gibbs, J.R.; Schymick, J.C.; Laaksovirta, H.; van Swieten, J.C.; Myllykangas, L.; et al. A Hexanucleotide Repeat Expansion in C9ORF72 Is the Cause of Chromosome 9p21-Linked ALS-FTD. Neuron 2011, 72, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Cleary, J.D.; Ranum, L.P. New developments in RAN translation: Insights from multiple diseases. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2017, 44, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Rudich, P.; Snoznik, C.; Watkins, S.C.; Monaghan, J.; Pandey, U.B.; Lamitina, S.T. Nuclear localized C9orf72-associated arginine-containing dipeptides exhibit age-dependent toxicity in C. elegans. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2017, 26, 4916–4928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. van Blitterswijk, M.; DeJesus-Hernandez, M.; Niemantsverdriet, E.; Murray, M.E.; Heckman, M.G.; Diehl, N.N.; Brown, P.H.; Baker, M.C.; Finch, N.A.; Bauer, P.O.; et al. Association between repeat sizes and clinical and pathological characteristics in carriers of C9ORF72 repeat expansions (Xpansize-72): A cross-sectional cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2013, 12, 978–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Therrien, M.; Rouleau, G.A.; Dion, P.A.; Parker, J.A. Deletion of C9ORF72 Results in Motor Neuron Degeneration and Stress Sensitivity in C. elegans. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e83450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Corrionero, A.; Horvitz, H.R. A C9orf72 ALS/FTD Ortholog Acts in Endolysosomal Degradation and Lysosomal Homeostasis. Curr. Biol. 2018, 28, 1522–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Wang, X.; Hao, L.; Saur, T.; Joyal, K.; Zhao, Y.; Zhai, D.; Li, J.; Pribadi, M.; Coppola, G.; Cohen, B.M.; et al. Forward Genetic Screen in Caenorhabditis elegans Suggests F57A10.2 and acp-4 As Suppressors of C9ORF72 Related Phenotypes. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2016, 9, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Van Damme, P.; Robberecht, W.; Van Den Bosch, L. Modelling amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Progress and possibilities. Dis. Model. Mech. 2017, 10, 537–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Cunha-Oliveira, T.; Montezinho, L.; Mendes, C.; Firuzi, O.; Saso, L.; Oliveira, P.J.; Silva, F.S.G. Oxidative Stress in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Pathophysiology and Opportunities for Pharmacological Intervention. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, 5021694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Landis, G.N.; Tower, J. Superoxide dismutase evolution and life span regulation. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2005, 126, 365–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Oeda, T.; Shimohama, S.; Kitagawa, N.; Kohno, R.; Imura, T.; Shibasaki, H.; Ishii, N. Oxidative stress causes abnormal accumulation of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-related mutant SOD1 in transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001, 10, 2013–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  129. Wang, J.; Farr, G.W.; Hall, D.H.; Li, F.; Furtak, K.; Dreier, L.; Horwich, A.L. An ALS-Linked Mutant SOD1 Produces a Locomotor Defect Associated with Aggregation and Synaptic Dysfunction When Expressed in Neurons of Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5, e1000350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  130. Li, J.; Huang, K.-X.; Le, W.-D. Establishing a novel C. elegans model to investigate the role of autophagy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2013, 34, 644–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Baskoylu, S.N.; Yersak, J.; O’Hern, P.; Grosser, S.; Simon, J.; Kim, S.; Schuch, K.; Dimitriadi, M.; Yanagi, K.S.; Lins, J.; et al. Single copy/knock-in models of ALS SOD1 in C. elegans suggest loss and gain of function have different contributions to cholinergic and glutamatergic neurodegeneration. PLoS Genet. 2018, 14, e1007682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Xu, H.; Jia, C.; Cheng, C.; Wu, H.; Cai, H.; Le, W. Activation of autophagy attenuates motor deficits and extends lifespan in a C. elegans model of ALS. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2022, 181, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Arai, T.; Hasegawa, M.; Akiyama, H.; Ikeda, K.; Nonaka, T.; Mori, H.; Mann, D.; Tsuchiya, K.; Yoshida, M.; Hashizume, Y.; et al. TDP-43 is a component of ubiquitin-positive tau-negative inclusions in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 351, 602–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Neumann, M.; Sampathu, D.M.; Kwong, L.K.; Truax, A.C.; Micsenyi, M.C.; Chou, T.T.; Bruce, J.; Schuck, T.; Grossman, M.; Clark, C.M.; et al. Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Science 2006, 314, 130–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Meneses, A.; Koga, S.; O’Leary, J.; Dickson, D.W.; Bu, G.; Na Zhao, N. TDP-43 Pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 2021, 16, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Zhang, T.; Hwang, H.-Y.; Hao, H.; Talbot, C., Jr.; Wang, J. Caenorhabditis elegans RNA-processing Protein TDP-1 Regulates Protein Homeostasis and Life Span. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 8371–8382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Vaccaro, A.; Tauffenberger, A.; Ash, P.E.A.; Carlomagno, Y.; Petrucelli, L.; Parker, J.A. TDP-1/TDP-43 Regulates Stress Signaling and Age-Dependent Proteotoxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Vaccaro, A.; Tauffenberger, A.; Aggad, D.; Rouleau, G.; Drapeau, P.; Parker, J.A. Mutant TDP-43 and FUS Cause Age-Dependent Paralysis and Neurodegeneration in C. elegans. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ash, P.E.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Roberts, C.M.; Saldi, T.; Hutter, H.; Buratti, E.; Petrucelli, L.; Link, C.D. Neurotoxic effects of TDP-43 overexpression in C. elegans. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19, 3206–3218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Liachko, N.F.; Guthrie, C.R.; Kraemer, B.C. Phosphorylation Promotes Neurotoxicity in a Caenorhabditis elegans Model of TDP-43 Proteinopathy. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 16208–16219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Kwiatkowski, T.J., Jr.; Bosco, D.A.; Leclerc, A.L.; Tamrazian, E.; Vanderburg, C.R.; Russ, C.; Davis, A.; Gilchrist, J.; Kasarskis, E.J.; Munsat, T.; et al. Mutations in the FUS/TLS Gene on Chromosome 16 Cause Familial Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Science 2009, 323, 1205–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Deng, H.; Gao, K.; Jankovic, J. The role of FUS gene variants in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2014, 10, 337–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Murakami, T.; Qamar, S.; Lin, J.Q.; Schierle, G.S.K.; Rees, E.; Miyashita, A.; Costa, A.R.; Dodd, R.B.; Chan, F.T.S.; Michel, C.H.; et al. ALS/FTD Mutation-Induced Phase Transition of FUS Liquid Droplets and Reversible Hydrogels into Irreversible Hydrogels Impairs RNP Granule Function. Neuron 2015, 88, 678–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Monahan, Z.; Ryan, V.H.; Janke, A.M.; Burke, K.A.; Rhoads, S.N.; Zerze, G.H.; O’Meally, R.; Dignon, G.L.; Conicella, A.E.; Zheng, W.; et al. Phosphorylation of the FUS low-complexity domain disrupts phase separation, aggregation, and toxicity. EMBO J. 2017, 36, 2951–2967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Yang, L.; Gal, J.; Chen, J.; Zhu, H. Self-assembled FUS binds active chromatin and regulates gene transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 17809–17814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Luo, Y.; Blechingberg, J.; Fernandes, A.M.; Li, S.; Fryland, T.; Børglum, A.D.; Bolund, L.; Nielsen, A.L. EWS and FUS bind a subset of transcribed genes encoding proteins enriched in RNA regulatory functions. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Schwartz, J.C.; Ebmeier, C.C.; Podell, E.R.; Heimiller, J.; Taatjes, D.J.; Cech, T.R. FUS binds the CTD of RNA polymerase II and regulates its phosphorylation at Ser2. Genes Dev. 2012, 26, 2690–2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Therrien, M.; Rouleau, G.A.; Dion, P.A.; Parker, J.A. FET proteins regulate lifespan and neuronal integrity. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  149. Murakami, T.; Yang, S.-P.; Xie, L.; Kawano, T.; Fu, D.; Mukai, A.; Bohm, C.; Chen, F.; Robertson, J.; Suzuki, H.; et al. ALS mutations in FUS cause neuronal dysfunction and death in Caenorhabditis elegans by a dominant gain-of-function mechanism. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011, 21, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Jorgensen, E.M. Gaba. WormBook 2005, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Labarre, A.; Tossing, G.; Maios, C.; Doyle, J.J.; Parker, J.A. A single copy transgenic mutant FUS strain reproduces age-dependent ALS phenotypes in C. elegans. Micropublication Biol. 2021, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Markert, S.M.; Skoruppa, M.; Yu, B.; Mulcahy, B.; Zhen, M.; Gao, S.; Sendtner, M.; Stigloher, C. Overexpression of an ALS-associated FUS mutation in C. elegans disrupts NMJ morphology and leads to defective neuromuscular transmission. Biol. Open 2020, 9, bio055129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. MacDonald, M.E.; Ambrose, C.M.; Duyao, M.P.; Myers, R.H.; Lin, C.; Srinidhi, L.; Barnes, G.; Taylor, S.A.; James, M.; Groot, N.; et al. A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington’s disease chromosomes. Cell 1993, 72, 971–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Reiner, A.; Dragatsis, I.; Dietrich, P. Genetics and Neuropathology of Huntington’s Disease. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2011, 98, 325–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Duyao, M.; Ambrose, C.; Myers, R.; Novelletto, A.; Persichetti, F.; Frontali, M.; Folstein, S.; Ross, C.; Franz, M.; Abbott, M.; et al. Trinucleotide repeat length instability and age of onset in Huntington’s disease. Nat. Genet. 1993, 4, 387–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Morley, J.F.; Brignull, H.R.; Weyers, J.J.; Morimoto, R.I. The threshold for polyglutamine-expansion protein aggregation and cellular toxicity is dynamic and influenced by aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 10417–10422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Faber, P.W.; Alter, J.R.; MacDonald, M.E.; Hart, A.C. Polyglutamine-mediated dysfunction and apoptotic death of a Caenorhabditis elegans sensory neuron. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Parker, J.A.; Connolly, J.B.; Wellington, C.; Hayden, M.; Dausset, J.; Neri, C. Expanded polyglutamines in Caenorhabditis elegans cause axonal abnormalities and severe dysfunction of PLM mechanosensory neurons without cell death. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 13318–13323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Cordeiro, L.M.; Machado, M.L.; da Silva, A.F.; Baptista, F.B.O.; da Silveira, T.L.; Soares, F.A.A.; Arantes, L.P. Rutin protects Huntington’s disease through the insulin/IGF1 (IIS) signaling pathway and autophagy activity: Study in Caenorhabditis elegans model. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 141, 111323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Cordeiro, L.M.; Soares, M.V.; da Silva, A.F.; Machado, M.L.; Baptista, F.B.O.; da Silveira, T.L.; Arantes, L.P.; Soares, F.A.A. Neuroprotective effects of rutin on ASH neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans model of Huntington’s disease. Nutr. Neurosci. 2022, 25, 2288–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Jia, K.; Hart, A.C.; Levine, B. Autophagy Genes Protect Against Disease Caused by Polyglutamine Expansion Proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans. Autophagy 2007, 3, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Baptista, F.B.O.; Arantes, L.P.; Machado, M.L.; da Silva, A.F.; Cordeiro, L.M.; da Silveira, T.L.; Soares, F.A.A. Diphenyl diselenide protects a Caenorhabditis elegans model for Huntington’s disease by activation of the antioxidant pathway and a decrease in protein aggregation. Metallomics 2020, 12, 1142–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Tauffenberger, A.; Vaccaro, A.; Aulas, A.; Velde, C.V.; Parker, J.A. Glucose delays age-dependent proteotoxicity. Aging Cell 2012, 11, 856–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Lee, A.L.; Ung, H.M.; Sands, L.P.; Kikis, E.A. A new Caenorhabditis elegans model of human huntingtin 513 aggregation and toxicity in body wall muscles. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Machiela, E.; Rudich, P.D.; Traa, A.; Anglas, U.; Soo, S.K.; Senchuk, M.M.; Van Raamsdonk, J.M. Targeting Mitochondrial Network Disorganization is Protective in C. elegans Models of Huntington’s Disease. Aging Dis. 2021, 12, 1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Traa, A.; Machiela, E.; Rudich, P.D.; Soo, S.K.; Senchuk, M.M.; Van Raamsdonk, J.M. Identification of Novel Therapeutic Targets for Polyglutamine Diseases That Target Mitochondrial Fragmentation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Fan, H.-C.; Ho, L.-I.; Chi, C.-S.; Chen, S.-J.; Peng, G.-S.; Chan, T.-M.; Lin, S.-Z.; Harn, H.-J. Polyglutamine (PolyQ) Diseases: Genetics to Treatments. Cell Transplant. 2014, 23, 441–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  168. Karikkineth, A.C.; Scheibye-Knudsen, M.; Fivenson, E.; Croteau, D.L.; Bohr, V.A. Cockayne syndrome: Clinical features, model systems and pathways. Ageing Res. Rev. 2017, 33, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  169. Scheibye-Knudsen, M.; Croteau, D.L.; Bohr, V.A. Mitochondrial deficiency in Cockayne syndrome. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2013, 134, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. van der Horst, G.T.; Meira, L.; Gorgels, T.G.; de Wit, J.; Velasco-Miguel, S.; Richardson, J.A.; Kamp, Y.; Vreeswijk, M.P.; Smit, B.; Bootsma, D.; et al. UVB radiation-induced cancer predisposition in Cockayne syndrome group A (Csa) mutant mice. DNA Repair 2002, 1, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Liakos, A.; Lavigne, M.D.; Fousteri, M. Nucleotide Excision Repair: From Neurodegeneration to Cancer. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017, 1007, 17–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Lee, M.H.; Ahn, B.; Choi, I.S.; Koo, H.-S. The gene expression and deficiency phenotypes of Cockayne syndrome B protein in Caenorhabditis elegans. FEBS Lett. 2002, 522, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  173. Babu, V.; Hofmann, K.; Schumacher, B. A C. elegans homolog of the Cockayne syndrome complementation group A gene. DNA Repair 2014, 24, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  174. Mueller, M.M.; Castells-Roca, L.; Babu, V.; Ermolaeva, M.A.; Müller, R.-U.; Frommolt, P.; Williams, A.B.; Greiss, S.; Schneider, J.I.; Benzing, T.; et al. DAF-16/FOXO and EGL-27/GATA promote developmental growth in response to persistent somatic DNA damage. Nature 2014, 16, 1168–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  175. Lopes, A.F.C.; Bozek, K.; Herholz, M.; Trifunovic, A.; Rieckher, M.; Schumacher, B. A C. elegans model for neurodegeneration in Cockayne syndrome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, 10973–10985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Liakos, A.; Konstantopoulos, D.; Lavigne, M.D.; Fousteri, M. Continuous transcription initiation guarantees robust repair of all transcribed genes and regulatory regions. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. Babu, V.; Schumacher, B. A C. elegans homolog for the UV-hypersensitivity syndrome disease gene UVSSA. DNA Repair 2016, 41, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Zaninello, M.; Palikaras, K.; Naon, D.; Iwata, K.; Herkenne, S.; Quintana-Cabrera, R.; Semenzato, M.; Grespi, F.; Ross-Cisneros, F.N.; Carelli, V.; et al. Inhibition of autophagy curtails visual loss in a model of autosomal dominant optic atrophy. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Alexander, C.; Votruba, M.; Pesch, U.E.A.; Thiselton, D.L.; Mayer, S.; Moore, A.; Rodriguez, M.; Kellner, U.; Leo-Kottler, B.; Auburger, G.; et al. OPA1, encoding a dynamin-related GTPase, is mutated in autosomal dominant optic atrophy linked to chromosome 3q28. Nat. Genet. 2000, 26, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Delettre, C.; Lenaers, G.; Griffoin, J.-M.; Gigarel, N.; Lorenzo, C.; Belenguer, P.; Pelloquin, L.; Grosgeorge, J.; Turc-Carel, C.; Perret, E.; et al. Nuclear gene OPA1, encoding a mitochondrial dynamin-related protein, is mutated in dominant optic atrophy. Nat. Genet. 2000, 26, 207–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Zaninello, M.; Palikaras, K.; Sotiriou, A.; Tavernarakis, N.; Scorrano, L. Sustained intracellular calcium rise mediates neuronal mitophagy in models of autosomal dominant optic atrophy. Cell Death Differ. 2021, 29, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Palikaras, K.; Tavernarakis, N. Mitophagy in neurodegeneration and aging. Front. Genet. 2012, 3, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. Weinhouse, C.; Truong, L.; Meyer, J.N.; Allard, P. Caenorhabditis elegans as an emerging model system in environmental epigenetics. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2018, 59, 560–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Maloy, S.R.; Hughes, K.T. Brenner’s Encyclopedia of Genetics, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  185. O’Reilly, L.P.; Luke, C.J.; Perlmutter, D.H.; Silverman, G.A.; Pak, S.C. C. elegans in high-throughput drug discovery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2013, 69–70, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  186. Ma, L.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Cheng, B.; Peng, A.; Huang, K. Caenorhabditis elegans as a model system for target identification and drug screening against neurodegenerative diseases. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 819, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. McIntyre, R.L.; Molenaars, M.; Schomakers, B.V.; Gao, A.W.; Kamble, R.; Jongejan, A.; van Weeghel, M.; van Kuilenburg, A.B.; Possemato, R.; Houtkooper, R.H.; et al. Anti-retroviral treatment with zidovudine alters pyrimidine metabolism, reduces translation, and extends healthy longevity via ATF-4. Cell Rep. 2022, 42, 111928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Chen, X.; Barclay, J.W.; Burgoyne, R.D.; Morgan, A. Using C. elegans to discover therapeutic compounds for ageing-associated neurodegenerative diseases. Chem. Central J. 2015, 9, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  189. Patten, S.A.; Aggad, D.; Martinez, J.; Tremblay, E.; Petrillo, J.; Armstrong, G.A.; La Fontaine, A.; Maios, C.; Liao, M.; Ciura, S.; et al. Neuroleptics as therapeutic compounds stabilizing neuromuscular transmission in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. JCI Insight 2017, 2, e97152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Wong, S.Q.; Pontifex, M.G.; Phelan, M.M.; Pidathala, C.; Kraemer, B.C.; Barclay, J.W.; Berry, N.G.; O’Neill, P.M.; Burgoyne, R.D.; Morgan, A. α-Methyl-α-phenylsuccinimide ameliorates neurodegeneration in a C. elegans model of TDP-43 proteinopathy. Neurobiol. Dis. 2018, 118, 40–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Matlack, K.E.S.; Tardiff, D.F.; Narayan, P.; Hamamichi, S.; Caldwell, K.A.; Caldwell, G.A.; Lindquist, S. Clioquinol promotes the degradation of metal-dependent amyloid-β (Aβ) oligomers to restore endocytosis and ameliorate Aβ toxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 4013–4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  192. Pujols, J.; Peña-Díaz, S.; Lázaro, D.F.; Peccati, F.; Pinheiro, F.; González, D.; Carija, A.; Navarro, S.; Conde-Giménez, M.; García, J.; et al. Small molecule inhibits α-synuclein aggregation, disrupts amyloid fibrils, and prevents degeneration of dopaminergic neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 10481–10486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  193. Murray, K.A.; Hu, C.J.; Pan, H.; Lu, J.; Abskharon, R.; Bowler, J.T.; Rosenberg, G.M.; Williams, C.K.; Elezi, G.; Balbirnie, M.; et al. Small molecules disaggregate alpha-synuclein and prevent seeding from patient brain-derived fibrils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2217835120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Mondal, S.; Hegarty, E.; Martin, C.; Gökçe, S.K.; Ghorashian, N.; Ben-Yakar, A. Large-scale microfluidics providing high-resolution and high-throughput screening of Caenorhabditis elegans poly-glutamine aggregation model. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  195. Sohrabi, S.; Mor, D.E.; Kaletsky, R.; Keyes, W.; Murphy, C.T. High-throughput behavioral screen in C. elegans reveals Parkinson’s disease drug candidates. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Xie, C.; Zhuang, X.-X.; Niu, Z.; Ai, R.; Lautrup, S.; Zheng, S.; Jiang, Y.; Han, R.; Gupta, T.S.; Cao, S.; et al. Amelioration of Alzheimer’s disease pathology by mitophagy inducers identified via machine learning and a cross-species workflow. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2022, 6, 76–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Kraemer, B.C.; Schellenberg, G.D. SUT-1 enables tau-induced neurotoxicity in C. elegans. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2007, 16, 1959–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Knight, A.L.; Yan, X.; Hamamichi, S.; Ajjuri, R.R.; Mazzulli, J.R.; Zhang, M.W.; Daigle, J.G.; Zhang, S.; Borom, A.R.; Roberts, L.R.; et al. The Glycolytic Enzyme, GPI, Is a Functionally Conserved Modifier of Dopaminergic Neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s Models. Cell Metab. 2014, 20, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Mor, D.E.; Tsika, E.; Mazzulli, J.R.; Gould, N.S.; Kim, H.; Daniels, M.J.; Doshi, S.; Gupta, P.; Grossman, J.L.; Tan, V.X.; et al. Dopamine induces soluble α-synuclein oligomers and nigrostriatal degeneration. Nat. Neurosci. 2017, 20, 1560–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  200. Gitler, A.D.; Chesi, A.; Geddie, M.L.; Strathearn, K.E.; Hamamichi, S.; Hill, K.J.; Caldwell, K.A.; Caldwell, G.A.; Cooper, A.A.; Rochet, J.-C.; et al. α-Synuclein is part of a diverse and highly conserved interaction network that includes PARK9 and manganese toxicity. Nat. Genet. 2009, 41, 308–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  201. Qiao, L.; Hamamichi, S.; Caldwell, K.A.; Caldwell, G.A.; Yacoubian, T.A.; Wilson, S.; Xie, Z.-L.; Speake, L.D.; Parks, R.; Crabtree, D.; et al. Lysosomal enzyme cathepsin D protects against alpha-synuclein aggregation and toxicity. Mol. Brain 2008, 1, 17–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Examples of C. elegans models used to study neurodegenerative disorders by expressing human disease-associated genes in specific cell types. The GABAergic neurons are illustrated in green, and magnified are the body wall muscle cells (red) and the dopaminergic neurons (orange). AD = Alzheimer’s disease, PD = Parkinson’s disease, ALS = amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, HD = Huntington’s disease, ADOA = Autosomal Dominant Optic Atrophy.
Figure 1. Examples of C. elegans models used to study neurodegenerative disorders by expressing human disease-associated genes in specific cell types. The GABAergic neurons are illustrated in green, and magnified are the body wall muscle cells (red) and the dopaminergic neurons (orange). AD = Alzheimer’s disease, PD = Parkinson’s disease, ALS = amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, HD = Huntington’s disease, ADOA = Autosomal Dominant Optic Atrophy.
Biomolecules 13 00478 g001
Figure 2. Selected advantages of C. elegans that render it an ideal animal model.
Figure 2. Selected advantages of C. elegans that render it an ideal animal model.
Biomolecules 13 00478 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Roussos, A.; Kitopoulou, K.; Borbolis, F.; Palikaras, K. Caenorhabditis elegans as a Model System to Study Human Neurodegenerative Disorders. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 478. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13030478

AMA Style

Roussos A, Kitopoulou K, Borbolis F, Palikaras K. Caenorhabditis elegans as a Model System to Study Human Neurodegenerative Disorders. Biomolecules. 2023; 13(3):478. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13030478

Chicago/Turabian Style

Roussos, Antonis, Katerina Kitopoulou, Fivos Borbolis, and Konstantinos Palikaras. 2023. "Caenorhabditis elegans as a Model System to Study Human Neurodegenerative Disorders" Biomolecules 13, no. 3: 478. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13030478

APA Style

Roussos, A., Kitopoulou, K., Borbolis, F., & Palikaras, K. (2023). Caenorhabditis elegans as a Model System to Study Human Neurodegenerative Disorders. Biomolecules, 13(3), 478. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13030478

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop