Artificial Intelligence Assists in the Detection of Blood Vessels in Whole Slide Images: Practical Benefits for Oncological Pathology
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Automated Blood Vessel Detection in Cancer
2.1. Breast Cancer
2.2. Lung Adenocarcinoma
2.3. Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
2.4. Colorectal Cancer
2.5. Gastric Cancer
2.6. Glioblastoma
2.7. Renal Cell Carcinoma
2.8. Pancreatic Cancer
3. Machine Learning Approaches to Blood Vessel Detection
- -
- DeepLab V3/V3+ [29];
- -
- -
- -
- -
- Approaches based on pixel-wise segmentation (classification of each pixel in the image), referred to as the pixel-wise segmentation approach [43];
- -
- Approaches based on the use of superpixels, where a superpixel is a relatively homogeneous group of adjacent pixels (atomic region), referred to as the superpixel segmentation approach [44];
- -
- -
- Only a small part of the dataset has been annotated;
- -
- Presence of samples with rough/inaccurate labeling;
- -
- Presence of samples with mistakes in the annotation (incorrect markup).
4. Challenges and Perspectives
- (1)
- Variability in slide preparation and staining techniques can lead to inconsistencies in the appearance of blood vessels, which may negatively impact the performance of AI-based methods. This challenge can be mitigated by developing robust models that can handle such variations, incorporating data augmentation techniques during training, and standardizing slide preparation and staining procedures.
- (2)
- AI-based methods, especially deep learning approaches, require large amounts of annotated data for training [21]. The manual annotation of blood vessels in histological slides is time consuming and prone to inter-observer variability. To address this challenge, researchers can employ active learning strategies to optimize the use of annotated data, develop semi-automated annotation tools to assist pathologists and explore the potential of synthetic or simulated data to augment the training dataset. The generalizability of AI models relies on their ability to perform well across different patient populations, histological slide preparations, and staining techniques. Larger and more diverse datasets ensure that AI algorithms are trained and tested on a wider range of variations, which in turn improves the model’s ability to accurately detect blood vessels in different clinical scenarios [22].
- (3)
- Deep learning models can be difficult to interpret and explain, which can hinder their adoption in clinical practice [23]. To overcome this, researchers should focus on developing explainable AI (XAI) methods that provide insights into the underlying decision-making process of the model [56]. Techniques such as saliency maps, layer-wise relevance propagation and attention mechanisms can help improve the interpretability of AI-based methods for blood vessel detection. For AI-based blood vessel detection methods to be successfully adopted in clinical practice, they must be seamlessly integrated into existing clinical workflows [57].
- (4)
- The implementation of AI-based methods in clinical practice raises ethical and legal concerns, such as data privacy, informed consent, and liability for misdiagnosis. Researchers and healthcare professionals should work together to establish guidelines and policies that address these concerns, ensuring the responsible and ethical use of AI-based methods for blood vessel detection.
- (5)
- One of the major challenges associated with AI models, particularly deep learning methods, is their black-box nature, meaning that the decision-making process of the model is not easily understandable by humans. A human-in-the-loop approach can address this issue by involving clinicians in the model development and validation process. By providing feedback on AI-generated results, clinicians can help improve the transparency and interpretability of the models, ensuring that AI technology is more clinically relevant and applicable [24].
5. Projections for Clinical Translation
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lugano, R.; Ramachandran, M.; Dimberg, A. Tumor angiogenesis: Causes, consequences, challenges and opportunities. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 77, 1745–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Teleanu, R.I.; Chircov, C.; Grumezescu, A.M.; Teleanu, D.M. Tumor Angiogenesis and Anti-Angiogenic Strategies for Cancer Treatment. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 9, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brierley, J.D.; Gospodarowicz, M.K.; Wittekind, C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Cancer Protocol Templates|College of American Pathologists. Available online: https://www.cap.org/protocols-and-guidelines/cancer-reporting-tools/cancer-protocol-templates (accessed on 1 July 2023).
- Esteves, M.; Monteiro, M.P.; Duarte, J.A. The effects of vascularization on tumor development: A systematic review and meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2021, 159, 103245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fraz, M.; Shaban, M.; Graham, S.; Khurram, S.A.; Rajpoot, N.M. Uncertainty driven pooling network for microvessel segmentation in routine histology images. In Proceedings of the Computational Pathology and Ophthalmic Medical Image Analysis: First International Workshop, COMPAY 2018, and 5th International Workshop, OMIA 2018, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Granada, Spain, 16–20 September 2018; pp. 156–164. [Google Scholar]
- Raza, S.E.A.; Cheung, L.; Shaban, M.; Graham, S.; Epstein, D.; Pelengaris, S.; Khan, M.; Rajpoot, N.M. Micro-Net: A unified model for segmentation of various objects in microscopy images. Med. Image Anal. 2019, 52, 160–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, Y.; Yang, M.; Wang, S.; Li, X.; Sun, Y. Emerging role of deep learning-based artificial intelligence in tumor pathology. Cancer Commun. 2020, 40, 154–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, J.; Yang, Y.; Luo, B.; Wen, Y.; Chen, Q.; Ma, R.; Huang, Z.; Zhu, H.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y.; et al. Further predictive value of lymphovascular invasion explored via supervised deep learning for lymph node metastases in breast cancer. Hum. Pathol. 2023, 131, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yi, F.; Yang, L.; Wang, S.; Guo, L.; Huang, C.; Xie, Y.; Xiao, G. Microvessel prediction in H&E Stained Pathology Images using fully convolutional neural networks. BMC Bioinform. 2018, 19, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vu, Q.D.; Graham, S.; Kurc, T.; To, M.N.N.; Shaban, M.; Qaiser, T.; Koohbanani, N.A.; Khurram, S.A.; Kalpathy-Cramer, J.; Zhao, T.; et al. Methods for Segmentation and Classification of Digital Microscopy Tissue Images. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraz, M.M.; Khurram, S.A.; Graham, S.; Shaban, M.; Hassan, M.; Loya, A.; Rajpoot, N.M. FABnet: Feature attention-based network for simultaneous segmentation of microvessels and nerves in routine histology images of oral cancer. Neural Comput. Appl. 2019, 32, 9915–9928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasool, A.; Fraz, M.M.; Javed, S. Multiscale unified network for simultaneous segmentation of nerves and micro-vessels in histology images. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Digital Futures and Transformative Technologies (ICoDT2), Islamabad, Pakistan, 20–21 May 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Kather, J.N.; Marx, A.; Reyes-Aldasoro, C.C.; Schad, L.R.; Zollner, F.G.; Weis, C.A. Continuous representation of tumor microvessel density and detection of angiogenic hotspots in histological whole-slide images. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 19163–19176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noh, M.-g.; Lee, J.; Cha, S.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.J.; Kim, N.; Gal, S.G.J.; Choi, Y.-D.; Kang, S.-R.; Song, G.-Y.; et al. Ensemble Deep Learning Model to Predict Lymphovascular Invasion in Gastric Cancer. 2023; preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Castelbajac, M. Automated Segmentation of Blood Vessels in Immuno-Stained Whole Slide Images; PRAT: Paris, France, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Zadeh Shirazi, A.; McDonnell, M.D.; Fornaciari, E.; Bagherian, N.S.; Scheer, K.G.; Samuel, M.S.; Yaghoobi, M.; Ormsby, R.J.; Poonnoose, S.; Tumes, D.J.J.B.J.o.C. A deep convolutional neural network for segmentation of whole-slide pathology images identifies novel tumour cell-perivascular niche interactions that are associated with poor survival in glioblastoma. Br. J. Cancer 2021, 125, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Tang, Q.; Yu, J.; Wang, Y.; Shi, Z. Microvascularity detection and quantification in glioma: A novel deep-learning-based framework. Lab. Investig. 2019, 99, 1515–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiao, R.; Ambrosetti, D.; Descombes, X. Multi-task Semi-supervised Learning for Vascular Network Segmentation and Renal Cell Carcinoma Classification. In Proceedings of the Resource-Efficient Medical Image Analysis: First MICCAI Workshop, REMIA 2022, Singapore, 22 September 2022; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Jayapandian, C.P.; Chen, Y.; Janowczyk, A.R.; Palmer, M.B.; Cassol, C.A.; Sekulic, M.; Hodgin, J.B.; Zee, J.; Hewitt, S.M.; O’Toole, J.; et al. Development and evaluation of deep learning-based segmentation of histologic structures in the kidney cortex with multiple histologic stains. Kidney Int. 2021, 99, 86–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bouteldja, N.; Klinkhammer, B.M.; Bulow, R.D.; Droste, P.; Otten, S.W.; Freifrau von Stillfried, S.; Moellmann, J.; Sheehan, S.M.; Korstanje, R.; Menzel, S.; et al. Deep Learning-Based Segmentation and Quantification in Experimental Kidney Histopathology. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2021, 32, 52–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Holscher, D.L.; Bouteldja, N.; Joodaki, M.; Russo, M.L.; Lan, Y.C.; Sadr, A.V.; Cheng, M.; Tesar, V.; Stillfried, S.V.; Klinkhammer, B.M.; et al. Next-Generation Morphometry for pathomics-data mining in histopathology. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, R.; Liu, Q.; Cui, C.; Yao, T.; Long, J.; Asad, Z.; Womick, R.M.; Zhu, Z.; Fogo, A.B.; Zhao, S.; et al. Omni-Seg+: A Scale-aware Dynamic Network for Pathological Image Segmentation. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2206.13632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hermsen, M.; de Bel, T.; den Boer, M.; Steenbergen, E.J.; Kers, J.; Florquin, S.; Roelofs, J.; Stegall, M.D.; Alexander, M.P.; Smith, B.H.; et al. Deep Learning-Based Histopathologic Assessment of Kidney Tissue. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2019, 30, 1968–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bevilacqua, V.; Pietroleonardo, N.; Triggiani, V.; Brunetti, A.; Di Palma, A.M.; Rossini, M.; Gesualdo, L. An innovative neural network framework to classify blood vessels and tubules based on Haralick features evaluated in histological images of kidney biopsy. Neurocomputing 2017, 228, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salvi, M.; Mogetta, A.; Meiburger, K.M.; Gambella, A.; Molinaro, L.; Barreca, A.; Papotti, M.; Molinari, F. Karpinski Score under Digital Investigation: A Fully Automated Segmentation Algorithm to Identify Vascular and Stromal Injury of Donors’ Kidneys. Electronics 2020, 9, 1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van der Laak, J.; Litjens, G.; Ciompi, F. Deep learning in histopathology: The path to the clinic. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 775–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gadermayr, M.; Eschweiler, D.; Jeevanesan, A.; Klinkhammer, B.M.; Boor, P.; Merhof, D. Segmenting renal whole slide images virtually without training data. Comput. Biol. Med. 2017, 90, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, J.; Warner, E.; Shaikhouni, S.; Bitzer, M.; Kretzler, M.; Gipson, D.; Pennathur, S.; Bellovich, K.; Bhat, Z.; Gadegbeku, C.; et al. Unsupervised machine learning for identifying important visual features through bag-of-words using histopathology data from chronic kidney disease. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 4832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farris, A.B.; Vizcarra, J.; Amgad, M.; Cooper, L.A.D.; Gutman, D.; Hogan, J. Artificial intelligence and algorithmic computational pathology: An introduction with renal allograft examples. Histopathology 2021, 78, 791–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kiemen, A.L.; Braxton, A.M.; Grahn, M.P.; Han, K.S.; Babu, J.M.; Reichel, R.; Jiang, A.C.; Kim, B.; Hsu, J.; Amoa, F.; et al. CODA: Quantitative 3D reconstruction of large tissues at cellular resolution. Nat. Methods 2022, 19, 1490–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiemen, A.L.; Damanakis, A.I.; Braxton, A.M.; He, J.; Laheru, D.; Fishman, E.K.; Chames, P.; Perez, C.A.; Wu, P.H.; Wirtz, D.; et al. Tissue clearing and 3D reconstruction of digitized, serially sectioned slides provide novel insights into pancreatic cancer. Med 2023, 4, 75–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, E.; Jiang, H.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, C.; Chen, M.; Zhu, W.; Shi, F.; Chen, X.; Zheng, J.; Bian, Y.; et al. Automatic multi-tissue segmentation in pancreatic pathological images with selected multi-scale attention network. Comput. Biol. Med. 2022, 151, 106228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niazi, M.K.K.; Hemminger, J.; Kurt, H.; Lozanski, G.; Gurcan, M. Grading vascularity from histopathological images based on traveling salesman distance and vessel size. In Proceedings of the Medical Imaging 2014: Digital Pathology, San Diego, CA, USA, 15–20 February 2014; pp. 76–82. [Google Scholar]
- Chhikara, B.S.; Parang, K. Global Cancer Statistics 2022: The trends projection analysis. Chem. Biol. Lett. 2023, 10, 451. [Google Scholar]
- Szklener, K.; Mazurek, M.; Wieteska, M.; Waclawska, M.; Bilski, M.; Mandziuk, S. New Directions in the Therapy of Glioblastoma. Cancers 2022, 14, 5377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.M.; Luo, B.; Ma, R.; Luo, X.X.; Chen, Y.S.; Li, Y. Lymphatic Endothelial Markers and Tumor Lymphangiogenesis Assessment in Human Breast Cancer. Diagnostics 2021, 12, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AbdulJabbar, K.; Raza, S.E.A.; Rosenthal, R.; Jamal-Hanjani, M.; Veeriah, S.; Akarca, A.; Lund, T.; Moore, D.A.; Salgado, R.; Al Bakir, M.; et al. Geospatial immune variability illuminates differential evolution of lung adenocarcinoma. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 1054–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, S.; Zhang, D.; Yi, S.; Gong, M.; Lu, C.; Cai, Y.; Tang, X.; Zou, L. The relationship of lymphatic vessel density, lymphovascular invasion, and lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 2863–2873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mollberg, N.M.; Bennette, C.; Howell, E.; Backhus, L.; Devine, B.; Ferguson, M.K. Lymphovascular invasion as a prognostic indicator in stage I non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2014, 97, 965–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barisoni, L.; Lafata, K.J.; Hewitt, S.M.; Madabhushi, A.; Balis, U.G.J. Digital pathology and computational image analysis in nephropathology. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2020, 16, 669–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Asadzadeh, S.; Khosroshahi, H.T.; Abedi, B.; Ghasemi, Y.; Meshgini, S. Renal structural image processing techniques: A systematic review. Ren. Fail. 2019, 41, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ronneberger, O.; Fischer, P.; Brox, T. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, 5–9 October 2015; pp. 234–241. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, J.; Luo, X.; Wang, G.; Gilmore, H.; Madabhushi, A. A deep convolutional neural network for segmenting and classifying epithelial and stromal regions in histopathological images. Neurocomputing 2016, 191, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Qi, X.; Yu, L.; Heng, P.-A. DCAN: Deep contour-aware networks for accurate gland segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 27–30 June 2016; pp. 2487–2496. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, H.; Chen, H.; Dou, Q.; Wang, L.; Qin, J.; Heng, P.-A. Scannet: A fast and dense scanning framework for metastastic breast cancer detection from whole-slide image. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), Lake Tahoe, NV, USA, 12–15 March 2018; pp. 539–546. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; David, P.; Foroosh, H.; Gong, B. A curriculum domain adaptation approach to the semantic segmentation of urban scenes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019, 42, 1823–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, H.; Upchurch, P.; Bala, K. Block annotation: Better image annotation with sub-image decomposition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 27 October–2 November 2019; pp. 5290–5300. [Google Scholar]
- Cordts, M.; Omran, M.; Ramos, S.; Rehfeld, T.; Enzweiler, M.; Benenson, R.; Franke, U.; Roth, S.; Schiele, B. The cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 27–30 June 2016; pp. 3213–3223. [Google Scholar]
- Elmore, J.G.; Barnhill, R.L.; Elder, D.E.; Longton, G.M.; Pepe, M.S.; Reisch, L.M.; Carney, P.A.; Titus, L.J.; Nelson, H.D.; Onega, T.; et al. Pathologists’ diagnosis of invasive melanoma and melanocytic proliferations: Observer accuracy and reproducibility study. BMJ 2017, 357, j2813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papandreou, G.; Chen, L.-C.; Murphy, K.P.; Yuille, A.L. Weakly-and semi-supervised learning of a deep convolutional network for semantic image segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Santiago, Chile, 7–13 December 2015; pp. 1742–1750. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.; Kim, E.; Yoon, S. Anti-adversarially manipulated attributions for weakly and semi-supervised semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Nashville, TN, USA, 20–25 June 2021; pp. 4071–4080. [Google Scholar]
- Ru, L.; Du, B.; Zhan, Y.; Wu, C. Weakly-supervised semantic segmentation with visual words learning and hybrid pooling. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2022, 130, 1127–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Z.-H. A brief introduction to weakly supervised learning. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2018, 5, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, J.; Shelhamer, E.; Darrell, T. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, MA, USA, 7–12 June 2015; pp. 3431–3440. [Google Scholar]
- Tosun, A.B.; Pullara, F.; Becich, M.J.; Taylor, D.L.; Chennubhotla, S.C.; Fine, J.L. Histomapr™: An explainable ai (xai) platform for computational pathology solutions. In Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Digital Pathology: State-of-the-Art and Future Challenges; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 204–227. [Google Scholar]
- Ågren, E. Image Segmentation on Lymph Node Images Using Machine Learning to Improve Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis. Master’s Thesis, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Adamo, A.; Bruno, A.; Menallo, G.; Francipane, M.G.; Fazzari, M.; Pirrone, R.; Ardizzone, E.; Wagner, W.R.; D’Amore, A. Blood Vessel Detection Algorithm for Tissue Engineering and Quantitative Histology. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2022, 50, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
No. | Article Title | Cancer Site | AI Model Name and Description | Accuracy | Advantages (+)/ Disadvantages (−) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Chen, Y.; et al. Further predictive value of lymphovascular invasion explored via supervised deep learning for lymph node metastases in breast cancer [9] | Breast | EEKT model (based on DeepLab V3+)— object detection model | 0.9300 | DL (Deep Learning) model showed the ability to quantify LBVI and identify its added predictive value (+) Unable to segment small vessels (−) |
2 | Yi, F.; et al. Microvessel prediction in H&E stained Pathology Images using fully convolutional neural networks [10] | Lung | FCN and FCN-8 models—object detection model | FCN—0.9520; FCN-8—0.9460 | FCN model algorithm may have a false positive problem for background regions where a large number of blood cells appear (−) |
3 | Vu, Q.D.; et al. Methods for Segmentation and Classification of Digital Microscopy Tissue Images [11] | Lung | ResNet50—object detection model | 0.8100 | Method primarily focuses on the diagnostic areas within the image for determining the cancer type (+) |
4 | Fraz, M.M.; et al. FABnet: feature attention-based network for simultaneous segmentation of microvessels and nerves in routine histology images of oral cancer [12] | Oral cavity | FABnet (U-Net, SegNet, DeepLabv3+, FCN-8)— pixel segmentation (heatmaps) plus object detection model | FABnet—0.9705; U-Net—95.18; SegNet—92.34; DeepLabv3+—97.21; FCN-8—94.46 | Segments the microvessels and nerves in routinely used H&E-stained images (+) FCN-8, U-Net and DeepLabv3+ are unable to segment small vessels; SegNet merges the two closely located by vessels into one large vessel |
5 | Fraz, M.M.; et al. Uncertainty Driven Pooling Network for Microvessel Segmentation in Routine Histology Images [6] | Oral cavity | Xception model—the object detection model | 0.9694 | The proposed method successfully segments small vessels and closely located vessels as different ones (+) |
6 | Rasool, A.; et al. Multiscale Unified Network for Simultaneous Segmentation of Nerves and Microvessels in Histology Images [13] | Oral cavity | ResNeXt 50, FCN8, U-Net, SegNet, Deeplabv3+—object detection models | ResNeXt 50—0.9785; FCN8—0.9693; U-Net—0.9518; SegNet—0.9234; Deeplabv3+—0.9721 | It can generate consistent and more refined shapes of irregular dimensional objects (+) |
7 | Kather, J.N.; et al. Continuous representation of tumor microvessel density and detection of angiogenic hotspots in histological whole-slide images [14] | Colon | MATLAB—pixel segmentation model (heatmaps) | Not reported | By turning from microscopic structures like single, small vessels to angiogenic hotspots, it seems to be possible to change the measurement scale from μm to mm. Consequently, histological vascular patterns could be compared with radiological data (+) |
8 | Noh, M.-g.; et al. Ensemble Deep Learning Model to Predict Lymphovascular Invasion in Gastric Cancer [15] | Stomach | YOLOX—object detection models | 0.9648 | YOLOX model can predict the LVI foci using a bounding box (+) A number of LVI(+) foci imbalances may exist for each slide; LVI(+) foci always contain the possibility of false positives or negatives (−) |
9 | de Castelbajac, M. Automated segmentation of blood vessels in immuno-stained whole slide images [16] | Brain | Segmentation based on HSV color model and radial algorithm for detecting open vessels (object detection model) | 0.8600 | Obvious bright and opened vessels are correctly retrieve (+), but not when the lumen is too small or partly stained like on the right (−) |
10 | Zadeh Shirazi, A.; et al. A deep convolutional neural network for segmentation of whole-slide pathology images identifies novel tumor cell-perivascular niche interactions that are associated with poor survival in glioblastoma [17] | Brain | DCNN—pixel segmentation model | 0.8600 | The model can segment unclear regions in the original slide (+), can tackle the problem of over-segmentation of the cellular tumor microvascular (+) |
11 | Li, X.; et al. Microvascularity detection and quantification in glioma: a novel deep-learning-based framework [18] | Brain | GoogLeNet—object detection model | 0.9570 | The accuracy of microvessel recognition has a large margin of improvement due to the segmentation error and the over counting, especially in larger pathological images with complex content (+) |
12 | Xiao, R.; et al. Multi-task Semi-supervised Learning for Vascular Network Segmentation and Renal Cell Carcinoma Classification [19] | Kidney | HRNet—patch-wise segmentation approach | 0.9369 | Model reduces the reliance on manually vascular network masks and achieves automatic segmentation (+). This model can outperform the fully supervised learning model and is versatile in other types of tumors (+) |
13 | O’Toole, J.; et al. Development and evaluation of deep learning–based segmentation of histologic structures in the kidney cortex with multiple histologic stains [20] | Kidney | U-net—object detection model | 0.9705 | Model correctly identified small fragments of tunica media despite the lack of a lumen (+) |
14 | Bouteldja, N.; et al. Deep Learning–Based Segmentation and Quantification in Experimental Kidney Histopathology [21] | Kidney | U-Net—object detection model | 0.8810 | Multiclass segmentation of renal histology and vascular pathology (+) The nonsegmented area comprises peritubular capillaries, arterial adventitia (−) |
15 | Klinkhammer, B.M.; et al. Next-Generation Morphometry for pathomics-data mining in histopathology [22] | Kidney | U-Net—multiclass segmentation model | 0.8700 | Multiclass segmentation of renal histology and vascular pathology (+) Model is unable to segment peritubular capillaries (−) |
16 | Deng, R.; et al. Omni-Seg: A Scale-aware Dynamic Network for Renal Pathological Image Segmentation [23] | Kidney | Omni-Seg+—object detection model | 0.9660 | The proposed method achieves superior segmentation performance with less computational resource consumption (+) |
17 | Hermsen, M.; et al. Hermsen, M.; et al. Deep Learning–Based Histopathologic Assessment of Kidney Tissue [24] | Kidney | U-net—object detection model | 0.8900 | Unable to segment peritubular capillaries (−) |
19 | Bevilacqua, V.; et al. An innovative neural network framework to classify blood vessels and tubules based on Haralick features evaluated in histological images of kidney biopsy [25] | Kidney | BPNN—object detection model | 0.8920 | High accuracy when trained on a limited dataset (+) |
20 | Salvi, M.; et al. Karpinski Score under Digital Investigation: A Fully Automated Segmentation Algorithm to Identify Vascular and Stromal Injury of Donors’ Kidneys [26] | Kidney | RENFAST (Rapid EvaluatioN of Fibrosis And vesselS Thickness)—multiclass segmentation model | 0.9443 | Detection of all structures of the blood vessel (+) |
21 | van der Laak, J.; et al. Deep learning in histopathology: the path to the clinic [27] | Kidney | CPATH (combination of U-Net models)—object detection model | 0.9700 | High accuracy in detecting arteriols (+) |
22 | Gadermayr, M.; et al. Segmenting renal whole slide images virtually without training data [28] | Kidney | Polygon-fitting segmentation method | 0.8600 | Gives an opportunity to segment structures without training data |
23 | Lee, J.; et al. Unsupervised machine learning for identifying important visual features through bag-of-words using histopathology data from chronic kidney disease [29] | Kidney | DeepLab V3+ with ResNet-18 architecture, pre-t ImageNet—object detection model | 0.9500 | Can help to discover previously unknown features that are useful for categorizing and predicting patient outcomes without human input (+) |
24 | Farris, A.B.; et al. Artificial intelligence and algorithmic computational pathology: an introduction with renal allograft examples [30] | Kidney | GoogLeNet—object detection model | 0.9500 | DL segmentation of arteries, arterioles, and peritubular capillaries (+) |
25 | Kiemen, A.L.; et al. CODA: quantitative 3D reconstruction of large tissues at cellular resolution [31] | Pancreas | CODA—multiclass segmentation model with vessel 3D-reconstruction | >90% | CODA gives the pathologist a spatial perspective of the course of blood vessels and their branching, and also allows prediction of the direction of tumor growth into the walls of the blood vessels |
26 | Kiemen, A.L.; et al. Tissue clearing and 3D reconstruction of digitized, serially sectioned slides provide novel insights into pancreatic cancer [32] | Pancreas | CODA—multiclass segmentation model with vessel 3D-reconstruction | >90% | CODA gives the pathologist a spatial perspective of the course of blood vessels and their branching, and also allows prediction of the direction of tumor growth into the walls of the blood vessels |
27 | Gao, E.; et al. Automatic multi-tissue segmentation in pancreatic pathological images with selected multi-scale attention network [33] | Pancreas | SMANet is based on U-Net with 5 levels—object detection mode | 0.7690 | Multi-scale attention network is proposed to realize the segmentation of tumor cells, blood vessels, nerves, islets and ducts in pancreatic pathological images (+) |
28 | Niazi, M.K.K.; et al. Grading vascularity from histopathological images based on traveling salesman distance and vessel size [34] | Bone marrow | MaxLink algorithm—object detection mode | 0.6820 | Gives the opportunity to associate the grading information with the patient outcome (+) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Timakova, A.; Ananev, V.; Fayzullin, A.; Makarov, V.; Ivanova, E.; Shekhter, A.; Timashev, P. Artificial Intelligence Assists in the Detection of Blood Vessels in Whole Slide Images: Practical Benefits for Oncological Pathology. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1327. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13091327
Timakova A, Ananev V, Fayzullin A, Makarov V, Ivanova E, Shekhter A, Timashev P. Artificial Intelligence Assists in the Detection of Blood Vessels in Whole Slide Images: Practical Benefits for Oncological Pathology. Biomolecules. 2023; 13(9):1327. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13091327
Chicago/Turabian StyleTimakova, Anna, Vladislav Ananev, Alexey Fayzullin, Vladimir Makarov, Elena Ivanova, Anatoly Shekhter, and Peter Timashev. 2023. "Artificial Intelligence Assists in the Detection of Blood Vessels in Whole Slide Images: Practical Benefits for Oncological Pathology" Biomolecules 13, no. 9: 1327. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13091327
APA StyleTimakova, A., Ananev, V., Fayzullin, A., Makarov, V., Ivanova, E., Shekhter, A., & Timashev, P. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Assists in the Detection of Blood Vessels in Whole Slide Images: Practical Benefits for Oncological Pathology. Biomolecules, 13(9), 1327. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13091327