Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Relationship between the Spatial Distribution of Different Age Populations and Points of Interest (POI) in China
Next Article in Special Issue
Parametric and Visual Programming BIM Applied to Museums, Linking Container and Content
Previous Article in Journal
Is One-Way Multi-Station Feasible? Influence of Value and Cost on Travel Intention of Urban Agglomeration in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modeling as a Critical Process of Knowledge: Survey of Buildings in a State of Ruin
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation Method for the Ming and Qing Dynasties’ Official-Style Architecture Roof Considering the Construction Regulations

ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11(4), 214; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11040214
by Youqiang Dong, Yihao Li and Miaole Hou *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11(4), 214; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11040214
Submission received: 9 March 2022 / Revised: 17 March 2022 / Accepted: 19 March 2022 / Published: 22 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heritage Building Information Modeling: Theory and Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I have recently reviewed the original version of the manuscript entitled "The Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation Method for the Ming and Qing Dynasty Official-style Architectures Roof Considering the Construction Regulations" on 2022-01-17 which was previously rejected pending revisions. The authors have now revised their manuscript and have responded to all my comments, so I don't have any more suggestions.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thanks for your comments. 

Best wishes.

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors adressed my comments. 

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thanks for your comments. 

Best wishes.

Reviewer 3 Report

Some minor comments: 

  • Fig 5, and 8 color bars are not readable.
  • Table 3: row s0: the OA is bold, row S1: there are 4 values for column average value, 
  • Table 4: "average values" is appeared in a wrong format
  •  

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thanks for your comments. We have revised the manuscript according to the comments. The response have upload an attachment.

Best wishes.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop