Next Article in Journal
Arnica montana Cell Culture Establishment, and Assessment of Its Cytotoxic, Antibacterial, α-Amylase Inhibitor, and Antioxidant In Vitro Bioactivities
Next Article in Special Issue
The Endemic Vascular Flora of Sardinia: A Dynamic Checklist with an Overview of Biogeography and Conservation Status
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of Hop Latent Viroid (HLVd) Infection on Gene Expression and Secondary Metabolite Contents in Hop (Humulus lupulus L.) Glandular Trichomes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Variations in Plant Richness, Biogeographical Composition, and Life Forms along an Elevational Gradient in a Mediterranean Mountain
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/plants10112298
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Niche Differentiation at Multiple Spatial Scales on Large and Small Mediterranean Islands for the Endemic Silene velutina Pourr. ex Loisel. (Caryophyllaceae)

by
Valentina Murru
1,
Emmanuele Farris
2,*,
Andrea Santo
1,
Oscar Grillo
1,
Carole Piazza
3,
Antonella Gaio
4,
Gianluigi Bacchetta
1,5 and
John D. Thompson
6
1
Centro Conservazione Biodiversità (CCB), Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e dell’Ambiente (DISVA), Università degli Studi di Cagliari, V.le S. Ignazio da Laconi 13, 09123 Cagliari, Italy
2
Dipartimento di Chimica e Farmacia, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Via Piandanna, 4-07100 Sassari, Italy
3
Conservatoire Botanique National de Corse, Avenue Jean Nicoli, 20250 Corte, France
4
Parco Nazionale Arcipelago di La Maddalena, Via Giulio Cesare, 7-07024 La Maddalena, Italy
5
Hortus Botanicus Karalitanus (HBK), Università degli Studi di Cagliari, V.le S. Ignazio da Laconi 9-11, 09123 Cagliari, Italy
6
Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionelle et Evolutive, UMR 5175, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Université Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, Route de Mende 1919, 34293 Montpellier, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(11), 2298; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112298
Submission received: 9 September 2021 / Revised: 7 October 2021 / Accepted: 19 October 2021 / Published: 26 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ecology and Evolution of Plants in the Mediterranean Basin: From Knowledge to Conservation)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The aim of this work is to investigate niche variations in endemic Silene velutina (Caryophyllaceae, Angiosperms) on Mediterranean islands that differ in size. Six populations on both large and small islands were sampled across the geographic range of the species. For each population, 10 plots (1 × 2 m, with a 25 cm grill) were randomly placed to quantify environmental (abiotic and biotic factors and disturbance) and population (demographic structure and reproductive success) parameters. Niche parameters related to substrate, plant cover, community diversity and composition and disturbance showed significant variation in relation to island size. At the regional scale, we detected a broader niche on large islands associated with spatial heterogeneity and island size. In contrast, at the local scale, populations on small islands showed a broader niche, potentially due to a release from competition (low diversity and plant cover and absence of phanerophytes). Populations on large islands had a demographic structure biased towards vegetative individuals (seedlings and juveniles) with few reproductive individuals, while those on small islands had a majority of adults. Together, the results on niche breadth and demographic structure concord with the idea of a strategy based on adult persistence on small islands.

1. Introduction

Island archipelagos have long fascinated biologists because of the originality of their fauna and flora [1,2]. As a result of their isolation, patterns and processes of biodiversity evolution often differ on islands compared to mainland situations, as observed for population and community dynamics, species composition and species richness [3,4,5,6].
The rate at which species increase in number with the augmentation of island surface area is a fundamental issue in island ecology and biogeography [3,7]. A major correlate of increasing species diversity with island size is habitat diversity [8,9,10,11,12,13]. In fact, an increase in island size is often associated with increasing ecological complexity, which takes the form of a landscape mosaic of different environments. In addition, since the formulation of the Theory of Island Biogeography and the so-called “species–area relationship” on islands [3], anomalous patterns for this relationship have been detected on small islands, the so-called “small island effect” [14,15,16,17]. In addition, species diversity can be modified by disturbance, which can alter the environmental conditions and relationships among individuals, populations and species, by producing new open areas and reduced competition [18,19].
The Mediterranean Basin, with its recurrent juxtaposition of large islands and more than 1000 minor islands in the western Mediterranean Sea [20], represents an ideal natural laboratory for studies of insular ecology and biogeography. Most Mediterranean islands are once-connected continental fragments or land-bridge islands [21] that were historically linked to adjacent continents (“continental islands” sensu [22]). On these islands, species richness is often significantly correlated with both area and elevation, but poorly with distance from continental areas, because their floras were very similar prior to isolation [21,23,24,25,26]. Of major importance for species diversity on large Mediterranean islands is thus the elevation gradient and habitat diversity [21].
Vascular plants can respond to environmental changes with different demographic strategies [27,28]. Two alternative strategies may evolve in habitats that differ in terms of stability, stress gradients and inter-specific competitive interactions [27,29,30,31]. A strategy of persistence is often observed in stable habitats with the in situ maintenance of established, adult plants. In contrast, a preponderant role of regeneration and the turnover and replacement of individuals by seedlings are favored in more dynamic successional or disturbed habitats.
These different demographic strategies may also reflect variation in the ecological niche. In the Mediterranean flora, endemic species have a distinct ecology compared to widespread congeners. The main element of their niche concerns their occurrence in rocky habitats on steep slopes in low, open vegetation with low species richness [21,32,33,34]. A characteristic of these habitats that may be crucial for the persistence of endemic species is that they are relatively stable, both in relation to vegetation succession and human activities. It is thus probable that the persistence of endemics may have been favored by their persistence in rocky habitats where competitive interactions are limited. In addition, Lavergne et al. [34,35] reported a clear trend for endemic species to be smaller in size and produce fewer seeds than widespread congeners and evidence that individual populations of endemic species have a greater temporal stability than that of widespread species. Populations of endemic species thus have traits, an ecological niche and recent history that all suggest high persistence and low turnover [21]. However, studies that investigate the spatial scale of ecological patterns of endemic species on Mediterranean islands remain rare, even though the realized niche is highly scale dependent [28,36,37,38].
In this study, we quantify the ecological niche and population structure of populations of Silene velutina Pourr. ex Loisel., a species that is endemic to Sardinia, Corsica and several small islands around their coastline. This study has three main objectives. First, we examine whether the species shows niche differentiation among populations on large and small islands, and, if so, whether niche differences are associated with particular types of habitat variables. Second, we examine whether there are differences in niche breadth at two different spatial scales (both local and regional scales). Third, we quantify the demographic structure of populations on small and large islands to test whether small island populations show a greater reliance on persistence due to their small size and isolation.

2. Results

2.1. Multivariate Analyses

We used linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to investigate niche differentiation among populations of Silene velutina large and small islands and among sites on each type of island. The two groups of islands were well distinguished, with an overall percentage of correct attribution of 91.6%, and a low percentage of misleading assignments. Large islands were correctly identified at 86.7% while small islands at 96.6% both with original data and after cross validation (Table S1). Elevation, sand, trampling, alien species and rockiness were the five variables with the greatest weight in the distinction between large and small islands. In addition, we found a correct discrimination among sites of 32.7% (considering large and small islands together; data not shown), while separate analysis showed a higher correct identification of sites on large islands (58.3%) compared to small islands (25%) (Tables S2 and S3).
Three principal components conjointly explained 53% of the total variance in the ecological dataset with a clear separation of large and small islands in ecological niche space (Figure 1). The first axis (PC1) was primarily influenced by biotic factors (total number of species, evenness, other species cover and total cover), the second axis was strongly influenced by substrate characteristics (slope, stoniness and sand cover) and disturbance (alien species and trampling) and the third axis was principally influenced by S. velutina cover and the presence of grazing (Eigenvectors of PCA are given in Table S4).
At the local scale, mean values of the CV for abiotic (elevation, distance from the sea, slope and litter cover) and biotic (S. velutina cover, other species cover) variables and disturbance were higher on small islands than on large islands (Figure 2). In contrast, on a regional scale, for total abiotic factors, the mean CV values were higher on large islands.

2.2. Abiotic Niche Components

Elevation, distance from the sea and slope were not significantly different for sites on large and small islands (Figure 3a,b). On large islands, there were significant differences (p < 0.05) among sites for both elevation and distance from the sea. The Src and Cfn sites were at higher elevation (ca. 60 m a.s.l.) and further from the sea (ca. 40 m) than the other sites. On small islands, significant differences among sites were found only for the distance from the sea (p < 0.05). Slope was highly heterogeneous among sites (p < 0.01) on both groups of islands.
On both groups of islands, well-drained substrates were more common than poor-drained substrates (51 plots on LI; 48 plots on SI), with no significant differences (p > 0.05) in their frequency on the two groups of islands (Figure 4a). Significant heterogeneity was observed among sites both on large islands (p < 0.01) and small islands (p < 0.02), where drainage was significantly higher in five and four sites, respectively. With regard to cover variables (Figure 4b–f), on large islands there was a significantly higher (p < 0.01) cover of stones, sand and litter (9.7%, 31.8% and 63.4%, respectively) than on small islands (2.6%, 0%, and 47.1%, respectively) and a significantly lower cover (p < 0.01) of rocks (18.7% vs. 59.7%). For bare soil cover there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between large and small islands (ca. 39% of soil coverage on both groups of islands). On large islands, the frequency of stones, rocks, sand, soil and litter was highly heterogeneous (p < 0.01) among sites (Figure 4b–f). On small islands, stone cover (p < 0.05) and rock, soil and litter cover (p < 0.01) were significantly heterogeneous among sites, and sand was absent from all monitored sites (Figure 4b–f).

2.3. Biotic Niche Components

Overall, we found 57 vascular plant taxa on the 12 studied islands and islets (Table S5), with a maximum of 22 taxa on Src and a minimum of 7 on Ist1, Ipr and Ids. Species diversity indices were calculated per plot (2 m2). The Shannon index (Figure 5a) and the total number of species (Figure 5b) were significantly higher (p < 0.02) on large islands than on small islands, while there was no effect of island size on the Pielou’s Evenness index (p > 0.05, Figure 5c). For the Shannon index and the total number of species, significant differences among sites (p < 0.05) were found on the large islands, where the Agl and Src sites showed the highest values (respectively 7.1 ± 0.5; 7.6 ± 0.4). The Pielou’s Evenness index did not show statistically significant differences among sites both on large and on small islands. The number of species per plot was statistically higher on large islands than on small islands for phanerophytes but did not differ for other growth forms. The number of species per plot was statistically different (p < 0.05) among sites on large islands for therophytes, hemicryptophytes and chamaephytes but showed no significant variation on small islands.
Species frequency in one, two and three or more plots showed significantly higher values on large islands than on small islands despite the fact that, in both groups of islands, the number of species detected in three or more plots was significantly higher than that of the species detected in one or two plots. For plant cover per plot, both total cover (56,4% and 41.1% on large and small islands, respectively) and S. velutina cover (13.6% and 22.4% on large and small islands, respectively) were not significantly different, while other species cover was significantly higher (p < 0.01) on large islands (42.9%) than on small islands (17.3%). We observed highly significant differences (p < 0.02) among sites only for other species cover on small islands (ranging from ca. 7.6% of Ibc to ca. 45.3% of Ids). Cover per plot was significantly higher (p < 0.05) on large islands for phanerophytes (ca. 23.7% on LI; ca. 0.9% on SI) and showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) among sites on large islands for therophytes and on small islands for geophytes (see Figure S1 for life form cover on LI and SI).

2.4. Disturbance

The presence of fire and phytophagy did not differ in relation to island size (p > 0.05), while significantly higher levels (p < 0.05) of disturbance were observed on large islands for grazing (LI ca. 12%; SI ca. 0%), trampling (LI ca. 37%; SI ca. 3%), presence of alien species (LI ca. 20%; SI ca. 0%) and garbage (LI ca. 25%; SI ca. 7%). Significant differences (p > 0.05) were detected among sites for all types of disturbance, except fire on large islands but not on small islands.

2.5. Population Parameters

The total number of individuals of S. velutina was not significantly different (p > 0.05) between populations on large and small islands; however, the number of vegetative plants (seedlings and juveniles) was significantly higher on large islands, and the number of reproductive individuals (adults) was significantly higher on small islands (Figure 6). For the size of adult individuals (major axis, minor axis, height), there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the two groups of islands. Significant differences in various elements of adult size were observed among sites on large islands but not on small islands (data not shown). The reproductive success of adult individuals (the number of floral stems, mature fruits, seeds per fruit and seed set per adult individual) showed no significant differences (p > 0.05) in relation to island size. Again, some traits (number of floral stems and seed set per adult individual) showed significant differences (p < 0.05) among sites on large but not small islands.

3. Discussion

In a literature search prior to our work, we were unable to find examples of studies that had investigated the niche dynamics in plant populations on islands that differ in size. Our study thus provides novel and clear evidence for niche differentiation between populations of Silene velutina on large and small islands in the western Mediterranean. In particular, we found significant effects of island size on several parameters related to substrate characteristics (notably the presence/absence of sandy soils and rock cover), elevation, plant cover, community composition and the occurrence of disturbance. We detected a higher variability of environmental conditions on large islands compared to small islands. Our data concord with previous findings that highlight niche differences that are determined by spatial fluctuations in environmental conditions (including disturbance regime) and biological interactions, such as competition [17,38,39]. In addition, other factors not analyzed in this study, such as local adaptation and phenotypic plasticity, may also play a role in niche differentiation at the local level [38].
On large islands, we found that variability in substrate composition of populations of S. velutina was higher than on small islands, as was the presence of organic matter and species diversity (Shannon index and total number of species) and cover of other species. Habitats on large islands are in a more advanced successional stage (presence of woody vegetation), than on small islands, where woody vegetation is almost absent. In populations on large islands, individuals of S. velutina occur in ecological conditions that encompass both sandy and rocky coastal locations, along an environmental stress gradient, from early successional stages close to the sea, to a more inland coastal edge of more mature vegetation (woody communities with Juniperus spp.), where environmental stress is lower and resource availability higher, but with more potential competition [40]. On large islands, populations occur in a more heterogeneous array of habitats as a result of disturbance due to grazing, trampling, presence of alien species and rubbish deposition. They also contain a higher proportion of vegetative (younger) individuals, indicative of a life-history strategy dominated by seedling recruitment and turnover. Examples of such a regeneration niche strategy [41] have been reported elsewhere for species and populations in disturbed environments [42]. Indeed, disturbance can create local dynamics of extinction–colonization, in which empty habitat patches are efficiently colonized [18,43]. In particular, disturbance can favor species with high dispersal ability (e.g., high number of juveniles and propagules) and high fecundity [43], but can also produce positive effects for non-competitive species [18].
In contrast, small-island populations of S. velutina tend to occur in rocky habitats with less litter cover, the presence of dwarf hemicryptophyte vegetation (ca. 70% of total cover), an absence of phanerophytes and a reduced cover of other species. These populations are characterized by fewer species and an almost complete absence of human-induced disturbance. The ecological niche of populations on small islands is determined by harsh but more homogeneous environments (absence of heterogeneity among sites for 14 of the 22 environmental variables), with low disturbance levels and potentially low competition. A similar type of ecological niche was reported in a comparative study of endemic Mediterranean vascular plants, which were typically found in rocky areas on relatively unfertile substrates, and were associated with stressful habitats with low competition and infrequent human disturbance [34,44].
In addition, although we found no differences in the abundance of individuals in populations on small or large islands, the proportion of reproductive individuals was higher on the former. Small island populations of S. velutina may thus have a life-history strategy based more on persistence of adult individuals than on recruitment of juveniles. In particular, the persistence niche strategy [31] is thought to be typical of populations in harsh and/or nutrient-poor environments such as rocky escarpments [45,46], where re-sprouting is prevented by resource limitation, and also in habitats with low levels of disturbance [42].
Populations can reduce or expand their niche breadth when exposed to different disturbance regimes, different competition levels, etc. [39,47]. In particular, niche expansion due to reduced competition (ecological release) is often illustrated for species on islands, where ecological release can be manifested [48,49]. The western Mediterranean endemic Cyclamen balearicum Willk. has a narrower ecological amplitude than its more widespread congener C. repandum Sm., and its realized niche variability is less among populations in continental France than among populations on the Balearic Islands [44]. Indeed, several endemic species on large Mediterranean islands may show wider niche breadth in relation to reduced competition [21 and references therein].
At the regional scale, we detected a wider niche breadth among S. velutina populations on large islands compared to small islands, while at the local scale, the opposite pattern was observed. At the regional scale, the result is probably due to spatial heterogeneity, which is positively correlated with island size, and to the occurrence of disturbance, a factor that can strongly modify species niche breadth due to the production of space that is free from competition [43]. Several studies have reported that generalist species are more frequent in heterogeneous and disturbed environments, while specialist species tend to favor less variable and less disturbed habitats [50,51]. At the local scale, the higher niche breadth of populations on small islands may be due to niche expansion associated with low biodiversity, plant cover and absence of phanerophytes. In the presence of interspecific competition, species can show a space use restriction and a niche shift [39,47]. Consequently, species do not always occupy all their fundamental niche with optimal conditions [52], but only the part in which they are competitively dominant [39]. Similar results have been found for both animals and plants [53,54,55].
Both specialization and niche breadth are conditioned by the methods used for the estimation of niche characteristics [55,56], by the set of considered variables and by the spatial scale at which they are evaluated [28,38]. Consequently, species may be specialist for certain variables on a given spatial scale, but generalist for other variables and on different scales [36,37,55]. However, few studies have considered the effect of spatial scale on niche breadth, and most studies have been based on a few variables that are relatively easy to measure or to detect in spatial datasets [57,58]. Examination of a large number of potential niche axes can, however, help to statistically identify the most important variables and thus better explain observed patterns.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Species and Sites

Silene velutina belongs to the Western Mediterranean Silene mollissima (L.) Pers. aggregate (included in the section Siphonomorpha Otth.), that may be considered an effective example of allopatric speciation of 11 disjunct “schizo-endemic” species [59]. Five of these species (S. badaroi Bestr., S. ichnusae Brullo, De Marco and De Marco f., S. hicesiae Brullo and Signorello, S. oenotriae Brullo and S. velutina Pourr. ex Loisel.) have a distribution centered on islands in the Tyrrhenian Sea and on the surrounding coastline [60].
Silene velutina is endemic to coastal habitats on northeastern Sardinia and southern Corsica and on several adjacent small islands. This chamaephytic species can grow on a variety of rocky, stony and sandy soil substrates derived from both siliceous bedrock degradation and carbonates of organogenic origin [60]. This species has a rosette with floral stems with a maximum height of 80 cm. Flowering is in late spring. Fruits are dehiscent capsules. Seeds tolerate salinity at concentrations similar to seawater and germination can occur until early spring [60]. Silene velutina is protected by the 1979 Berne Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats and has a priority status in Annex II of the EU Habitats Directive 43/92/EEC. It is considered vulnerable (VU) in France and endangered (EN) in Italy [61,62,63], but has not been evaluated (NE) in the IUCN International Red Lists [64].
In this study, we sampled populations located on the large islands (LI) of Sardinia, Corsica and La Maddalena (surface area > 49 km2) and populations on small islands (SI) that have a surface area < 6 km2. Within each group, six sites were randomly selected (Figure 7) from a list of populations [63].

4.2. Sampling Design and Response Variables

At each site, within the surface occupied by the species, ten 1 × 2 m plots with a 25 cm grill (45 nodes per plot) were randomly distributed in the population where the plant occurred (following [34,65]).
In each plot, we quantified a range of environmental and population parameters (Table S6). Qualitative variables were quantified in two ways. First, substrate composition in terms of the cover of stones, rocks, sand, soil and litter was assessed as point data for the presence of each element at each node of the plot grid for a total of 5400 point data. Second, drainage and presence of different types of disturbance (grazing, trampling, fire, alien plants, garbage and other unspecified disturbance) were quantified as present or absent in each plot, for a total of 120 replicates. Fire disturbance was derived from public inventories of burnt areas in the last decade. Quantitative variables related to plot localization (elevation, distance from the sea and slope) were noted for each plot (120 replicates). For the study of quantitative biotic variables, the presence of vascular plants was recorded by us at each plot node (5400 replicates) and each species was classified, named and assigned to a particular growth form and chorologic type (also to discriminate alien from native taxa) following Arrigoni [66], Jeanmonod and Gamisans [67] and Pignatti et al. [68]. The plant names follow Euro + Med PlantBase [69] and Bartolucci et al. [70]. Species presence data were used to calculate the total number of species, Shannon and Pielou’s Evenness indices [71,72], the total cover of vascular plants, S. velutina cover and other species cover per plot and community composition (number of species for each different life form and coverage of each life form). Moreover, in order to observe whether the community was composed mostly of rare or dominant species, species frequency in one, two or three or more plots was also quantified.
To quantify population structure, all individuals of S. velutina in each plot were counted, measured and attributed to one of three life-history stages: (1) seedlings: individuals with cotyledons often with one or two pairs of leaves and foliage diameter < 3 cm; (2) juveniles: non-reproductive individuals in the year of the study with foliage diameter ≥ 3 cm; (3) adults: reproductive individuals in the year of the study. For analyses of population structure, we regrouped seedlings and juveniles as vegetative plants, and adults as reproductive plants. In order to study reproductive success, we noted the number of floral stems for each adult, estimated the number of mature fruits for each floral stem and the number of seeds for each adult plant. Because of the dehiscence of capsules, the number of seeds per fruit was calculated including seed loss, that was estimated for each site by enveloping 6 fruits for 15 individuals in a cotton mesh sachet at the beginning of fruiting. Fieldwork was conducted in July 2014, when all populations were at the same phenological phase (end of fruiting).

4.3. Data Analysis

In order to verify whether the frequencies of qualitative variables were related to island size (LI vs. SI), χ2 tests were carried out to compare observed values with expected values. Within these analyses, G-tests of heterogeneity were conducted to compare how variables varied among the different sites on each type of island [73]. For the quantitative response variables, including reproductive success, two-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) was used to test the effect of island size (fixed factor) and site (random factor nested within island size). The homogeneity of variances was tested using Cochran’s C-test, and, where necessary, data were appropriately transformed. Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) tests were carried out to compare mean values when significant differences were detected [74].
Stepwise linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was applied to characterize and discriminate the realized niche in different sites and on the two groups of islands. As an output of the analysis, we obtained a percentage of correct assignment of islands on the basis of their abiotic and biotic features, described above. This method is useful to identify unknown groups characterized both by quantitative and qualitative variables [75]. A combination of predictor variables was found with the aim of minimizing within-group distances and maximizing between group distances to achieve maximum group discrimination [76,77,78]. To reduce overall complexity, differences in the ecological niche of S. velutina on large and small islands were visualized by means of principal components analysis (PCA) and graphically represented on three-dimensional axes using the first three discriminant functions. Finally, one-way ANOVA was conducted on the coefficient of variation (CV) to test for an effect of island size on niche breadth at the local and regional spatial scales. On a local scale, the CV was calculated using values of each variable per plot, and on the regional scale the CV was calculated using mean values per site (i.e., mean values of the 10 plots) for groups of variables (e.g., biotic and abiotic variables).
χ2 and G-tests of heterogeneity were conducted using an Excel spreadsheet, ANOVA was performed with GMAV5 software package (University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia), and PCA and LDA were carried out by means of SPSS software package release 16.0 (SPSS Inc. for Windows, Chicago, IL, USA).

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study revealed marked differences in population demographic structures associated with changing environmental parameters at different spatial scales on Mediterranean islands. It provides novel results concerning the ecological niche of the coastal endemic S. velutina, particularly in relation to niche differentiation between populations on large and small islands, variations in niche breadth at different spatial scales and changes in demographic structure of island populations. The work clearly shows the need to consider detailed quantitative data, concerning both environmental and population parameters, to correctly characterize the species niche in populations located in different ecological and/or geographical contexts, within the distribution range of each species. Our results confirm the value of obtaining detailed quantitative data concerning both environmental and population parameters on a highly localized scale to correctly characterize the species’ niche in populations located in different ecological and geographic contexts across their distribution range (e.g., [64]). The results provide important information for our understanding of niche differentiation and for the conservation and management of rare endemic species, many of which suffer from a lack of information regarding their ecology and population dynamics.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants10112298/s1, Figure S1: Total cover for life forms on LI and SI. Phanerophytes (P), hemicryptophytes (H), chamaephytes (Ch), therophytes (T), geophytes (G), Table S1: LDA: Group classification. Percentages of correct identification after cross-validation, Table S2: LDA: LI sites classification. Percentages of correct identification after cross-validation. Population codes as in Figure 7, Table S3: LDA: SI sites classification. Percentages of correct identification after cross-validation. Population codes as in Figure 7, Table S4: Eigenvectors of the PCA, Table S5: list of vascular plant taxa found at each studied island (BF = Biological Forms). Population codes as in Figure 7, Table S6: Detected environmental and population variables. Response variables that were detected as presence/absence per plot (n = 1) and frequency per plot (n = 45) are indicated with * and **, respectively. See sampling design for method of sampling.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.M., E.F., G.B. and J.D.T.; Data curation, V.M., A.S. and O.G.; Formal analysis, V.M., A.S. and O.G.; Funding acquisition, G.B.; Investigation, V.M., C.P. and A.G.; Methodology, V.M., E.F. and G.B.; Resources, G.B.; Supervision, G.B. and J.D.T.; Visualization, V.M.; Writing—original draft, V.M., E.F., G.B. and J.D.T.; Writing—review and editing, V.M., E.F., A.S., O.G., G.B. and J.D.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by University of Sassari, grant number FAR-2020 for E.F.

Acknowledgments

The data presented are part of the PhD Thesis of V.M., presented at the University of Cagliari, which is acknowledged for the PhD grant benefited by V.M. The “Parco Nazionale Arcipelago della Maddalena”, the “Réserve Naturelle des Bouches de Bonifacio” and the “Conservatoire Botanique National de Corse (CBNC)” are acknowledged for the authorisation to access the areas managed on several remote islets. Franco Piga, Mario Gallo, Perrine Gauthier, Stefania Pisanu, Alfredo Maccioni, Arianna Marengo, Giuseppe Fenu, Luca Frigau, Virginie Pons and Guillaume Papuga are also acknowledged for their precious help and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Darwin, C. On the Origin of the Species by Natural Selection; D. Appleton and Company: New York, NY, USA, 1859; p. 466. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wallace, A.R. Island Life: Or the Phenomena and Causes of Insular Faunas and Floras, Including a Revision and Attempted Solution of the Problem of Geological Climates; Macmillan and Co.: London, UK, 1880; p. 526. [Google Scholar]
  3. MacArthur, R.H.; Wilson, E.O. The Theory of Island Biogeography; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1967; p. 224. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wardle, D.A.; Zackrisson, O.; Hornberg, G.; Gallet, C. The influence of island area on ecosystem properties. Science 1997, 277, 1296–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Cody, M.L. Plants on Islands: Diversity and Dynamics on a Continental Archipelago; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2006; p. 269. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yu, M.; Hu, G.; Feeley, K.J.; Wu, J.; Ding, P. Richness and composition of plants and birds on land-bridge islands: Effects of island attributes and differential responses of species groups. J. Biogeogr. 2012, 39, 1124–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hubbell, S.P. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2001; p. 392. [Google Scholar]
  8. Williams, C.B. Patterns in the Balance of Nature and Related Problems in Quantitative Ecology; Academic Press: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1964; p. 324. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kohn, D.D.; Walsh, D.M. Plant species richness—The effect of island size and habitat diversity. J. Ecol. 1994, 82, 367–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Triantis, K.A.; Mylonas, M.; Lika, K.; Vardinoyannis, K. A model for the species–area–habitat relationship. J. Biogeogr. 2003, 30, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Panitsa, M.; Tzanoudakis, D.; Sfenthourakis, S. Turnover of plants on small islets of the eastern Aegean Sea within two decades. J. Biogeogr. 2008, 35, 1049–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Panitsa, M.; Trigas, P.; Iatrou, G.; Sfenthourakis, S. Factors affecting plant species richness and endemism on land-bridge islands: An example from the East Aegean archipelago. Acta Oecol. 2010, 36, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hortal, J.; Triantis, K.A.; Meiri, S.; Thébault, E.; Sfenthourakis, S. Island species richness increases with habitat diversity. Am. Nat. 2009, 174, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Whitehead, D.R.; Jones, C.E. Small islands and the equilibrium theory of insular biogeography. Evolution 1969, 23, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lomolino, M.V.; Weiser, M.D. Towards a more general species–area relationship: Diversity on all islands, great and small. J. Biogeogr. 2001, 28, 431–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Triantis, K.A.; Vardinoyannis, K.; Tsolaki, E.P.; Botsaris, I.; Lika, K.; Mylonas, M. Re-approaching the small island effect. J. Biogeogr. 2006, 33, 914–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, C.W.; Yang, X.R.; Tan, X.W.; Wang, Y.P. The role of habitat diversity in generating the small island effect. Ecography 2020, 43, 1241–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Farris, E.; Pisanu, S.; Ceccherelli, G.; Filigheddu, R. Effects of the management regime on the performance of the endangered Mediterranean Centaurea horrida Badarò (Asteraceae). J. Nat. Conserv. 2009, 17, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sheil, D. Disturbance and distributions: Avoiding exclusion in a warming world. Ecol. Soc. 2016, 21, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Fois, M.; Fenu, G.; Bacchetta, G. Global analyses underrate part of the story: Finding applicable results for the conservation planning of small Sardinian islets′ flora. Biodivers. Conserv. 2016, 25, 1091–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Thompson, J.D. Plant Evolution in the Mediterranean. Insignts for Conservation, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2020; p. 464. [Google Scholar]
  22. Whittaker, R.J.; Fernandez-Palacios, J.M. Island Biogeography: Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2007; p. 416. [Google Scholar]
  23. Médail, F.; Vidal, E. Organisation de la richesse et de la composition floristiques d’iles de la Méditerranée occidentale (sud-est de la France). Can. J. Bot. 1998, 76, 321–331. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kallimanis, A.S.; Mazaris, A.D.; Tzanopoulos, J.; Halley, J.M.; Pantis, J.D.; Sgardelis, S.P. How does habitat diversity affect the species–area relationship? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2008, 17, 532–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fois, M.; Podda, L.; Médail, F.; Bacchetta, G. Endemic and alien vascular plant diversity in the small Mediterranean islands of Sardinia: Drivers and implications for their conservation. Biol. Conserv. 2020, 244, 108519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Médail, F. Plant Biogeography and Vegetation Patterns of the Mediterranean Islands. Bot. Rev. 2021, 1–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. García, D.; Zamora, R. Persistence, multiple demographic strategies and conservation in long-lived Mediterranean plants. J. Veg. Sci. 2003, 14, 921–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Baumel, A.; Affre, L.; Véla, E.; Auda, P.; Torre, F.; Youssef, S.; Tatoni, T. Ecological magnitude and fine scale dynamics of the Mediterranean narrow endemic therophyte, Arenaria provincialis (Caryophyllaceae). Acta Bot. Gall. 2009, 156, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Grime, J.P. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am. Nat. 1977, 111, 1169–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bellingham, P.J.; Sparrow, A.D. Resprouting as a life history strategy in woody plant communities. Oikos 2000, 89, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bond, W.J.; Midgley, J.J. Ecology of sprouting in woody plants: The persistence niche. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Grove, A.T.; Rackham, O. The Nature of Mediterranean Europe: An Ecological History; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 2001; p. 384. [Google Scholar]
  33. Quézel, P.; Médail, F. Ecologie et Biogéographie des Forêts du Bassin Méditerranéen; Elsevier: Paris, France, 2003; p. 576. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lavergne, S.; Thompson, J.D.; Garnier, E.; Debussche, M. The biology and ecology of narrow endemic and widespread plants: A comparative study of trait variation in 20 congeneric pairs. Oikos 2004, 107, 505–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lavergne, S.; Thuiller, W.; Molina, J.; Debussche, M. Environmental and human factors influencing rare plant local occurrence, extinction and persistence: A 115-year study in the Mediterranean region. J. Biogeogr. 2005, 32, 799–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gaston, K.J.; Blackburn, T.M.; Lawton, J.H. Interspecific abundance range size relationships: An appraisal of mechanisms. J. Anim. Ecol. 1997, 66, 579–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Hughes, J.B. The scale of resource specialization and the distribution and abundance of lycaenid butterflies. Oecologia 2000, 123, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Devictor, V.; Clavel, J.; Julliard, R.; Lavergne, S.; Mouillot, D.; Thuiller, W.; Venail, P.; Villeger, S.; Mouquet, N. Defining and measuring ecological specialization. J. Appl. Ecol. 2010, 47, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Bolnick, D.I.; Ingram, T.; Stutz, W.E.; Snowberg, L.K.; Lau, O.L.; Paull, J.S. Ecological release from interspecific competition leads to decoupled changes in population and individual niche width. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2010, 277, 1789–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bertness, M.D.; Callaway, R.M. Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1994, 9, 191–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Grubb, P.J. The maintenance of species richness in plant communities: The importance of the regeneration niche. Biol. Rev. 1977, 52, 107–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Grime, J.P. Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2001; p. 456. [Google Scholar]
  43. Büchi, L.; Vuilleumier, S. Ecological strategies in stable and disturbed environments depend on species specialisation. Oikos 2016, 125, 1408–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Debussche, M.; Thompson, J.D. Habitat differentiation between two closely related Mediterranean plant species, the endemic Cyclamen balearicum and the widespread C. Repandum. Acta Oecol. 2003, 24, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Larson, D.W.; Matthes, U.; Gerrath, J.A.; Gerrath, J.M.; Nekola, J.C.; Walker, G.L.; Porembski, S.; Charlton, A.; Larson, N.W.K. Ancient stunted trees on cliffs. Nature 1999, 398, 382–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Larson, D.W.; Matthes, U.; Kelly, P.E. Cliff Ecology. Pattern and Process in Cliff Ecosystems; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000; p. 360. [Google Scholar]
  47. Van Valen, L. Morphological variation and width of ecological niche. Am. Nat. 1965, 99, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Givnish, T.J. Adaptive radiation and molecular systematics: Issues and approaches. In Molecular Evolution and Adaptive Radiation; Givnish, T.J., Sytsma, K.J., Eds.; Oxford University Press: London, UK, 1997; pp. 1–54. [Google Scholar]
  49. Gillespie, R.G.; Clague, D.A. Encyclopedia of Islands; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2009; p. 1111. [Google Scholar]
  50. Futuyma, D.J.; Moreno, G. The evolution of ecological specialisation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1988, 19, 207–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Devictor, V.; Julliard, R.; Jiguet, F. Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation. Oikos 2008, 117, 507–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Smith, T.M.; Smith, R.L. Elements of Ecology, 6th ed.; Pearson Benjamin Cummings: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2006; p. 655. [Google Scholar]
  53. Shimizu, Y.; Tabata, H. Forest structure, composition, and distribution on a Pacific island, with reference to ecological release and speciation. Pac. Sci. 1991, 45, 28–49. [Google Scholar]
  54. Mesquita, D.O.; Colli, G.R.; Vitt, L.J. Ecological release in lizard assemblages of neotropical savannas. Oecologia 2007, 153, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pannek, A.; Manthey, M.; Diekmann, M. Comparing resource-based and co-occurrence-based methods for estimating species niche breadth. J. Veg. Sci. 2016, 27, 596–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Slatyer, R.A.; Hirst, M.; Sexton, J.P. Niche breadth predicts geographical range size: A general ecological pattern. Ecol. Lett. 2013, 16, 1104–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Vetaas, O.R. Realized and potential climate niches: A comparison of four Rhododendron tree species. J. Biogeogr. 2002, 29, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chase, J.M.; Leibold, M.A. Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2003; p. 221. [Google Scholar]
  59. Jeanmonod, D. Révision de la section Siphonomorpha Otth du genre Silene, L. en Méditerranée occidentale. II: Le Group Du Silene mollissima. Candollea 1984, 39, 195–259. [Google Scholar]
  60. Murru, V.; Santo, A.; Piazza, C.; Hugot, L.; Bacchetta, G. Seed germination, salt-stress tolerance, and the effect of nitrate on three Tyrrhenian coastal species of the Silene mollissima aggregate (Caryophyllaceae). Botany 2015, 93, 881–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Olivier, L.; Galland, J.P.; Maurin, H.; Roux, J.P. Livre Rouge de la Flore Menacée de France. Tome I: Espèces Prioritaires. Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle; Ministère de l’Environnement, Service Patrimoine Naturel, Conservatoire Botanique National de Porquerolles: Paris, France, 1995; p. 135.
  62. Conti, F.; Manzi, A.; Pedrotti, F. Liste Rosse Regionali delle Piante d’Italia; WWF Italia, MATTM, Società Botanica Italiana, Poligrafica Editrice: Camerino, Italy, 1997; p. 637. [Google Scholar]
  63. Pisanu, S.; Caria, M.C.; Sotgiu, S.; Bagella, S. Silene velutina Loisel. Inf. Bot. Ital. 2014, 46, 148–150. [Google Scholar]
  64. Buord, S.; Gargano, D.; Gigot, G.; Montagnani, C. Silene Velutina. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2011. Version 3.1, e.T161830A5501371. Available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2011-1.RLTS.T161830A5501371.en (accessed on 23 August 2021).
  65. Papuga, G.; Gauthier, P.; Pons, V.; Farris, E.; Thompson, J.D. Ecological niche differentiation in peripheral populations: A comparative analysis of eleven Mediterranean plant species. Ecography 2018, 41, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Arrigoni, P.V. La Flora dell'Isola di Sardegna; Carlo Delfino Editore: Sassari, Italy, 2006; Volume 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  67. Jeanmonod, D.; Gamisans, J. Flora Corsica, 2nd ed.; Société Botanique du Centre Ouest: Jarnac, France, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  68. Pignatti, S.; Guarino, R.; La Rosa, M. Flora d'Italia, 2nd ed.; Edagricole: Bologna, Italy, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  69. Euro+Med. The Euro+Med PlantBase, the Information Resource for Euro-Mediterranean Plant Diversity. 2006. Available online: http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/ (accessed on 23 August 2021).
  70. Bartolucci, F.; Peruzzi, L.; Galasso, G.; Albano, A.; Alessandrini, A.N.M.G.; Ardenghi, N.M.G.; Astuti, G.; Bacchetta, G.; Ballelli, S.; Banfi, E.; et al. An updated checklist of the vascular flora native to Italy. Plant Biosyst. 2018, 152, 179–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Shannon, C.E.; Weaver, W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication; University of Illinois Press: Urbana, IL, USA, 1949; p. 144. [Google Scholar]
  72. Pielou, E.C. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J. Theor. Biol. 1966, 13, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sokal, R.R.; Rohlf, F.J. Biometry, 3rd ed.; Freeman and Company: New York, NY, USA, 1995; p. 887. [Google Scholar]
  74. Underwood, A.J. Experiments in Ecology: Their Logic Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1997; p. 504. [Google Scholar]
  75. Duda, R.; Hart, P.; Stork, D. Pattern Classification, 2nd ed.; Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2000; p. 680. [Google Scholar]
  76. Holden, J.E.; Finch, W.H.; Kelley, K. A comparison of two-group classification methods. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 2011, 20, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kuhn, M.; Johnson, K. Applied Predictive Modeling; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; p. 600. [Google Scholar]
  78. Rencher, A.C.; Christensen, W.F. Methods of Multivariate Analysis; John Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2012; p. 800. [Google Scholar]
Plants 10 02298 g001 550
Figure 1. Principal component analysis (PCA) of environmental variables on three axes that explain 53% of the variation in the dataset. Dots represent plots in populations on large (blue) and small (green) Mediterranean islands.
Figure 1. Principal component analysis (PCA) of environmental variables on three axes that explain 53% of the variation in the dataset. Dots represent plots in populations on large (blue) and small (green) Mediterranean islands.
Plants 10 02298 g001
Plants 10 02298 g002 550
Figure 2. Coefficient of variation (CV) at local (a–c) and regional (d–f) scales among populations on large (LI) and small (SI) Mediterranean islands. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences at p < 0.05 (by SNK test).
Figure 2. Coefficient of variation (CV) at local (a–c) and regional (d–f) scales among populations on large (LI) and small (SI) Mediterranean islands. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences at p < 0.05 (by SNK test).
Plants 10 02298 g002
Plants 10 02298 g003 550
Figure 3. Mean elevation (a), distance from the sea (b) and slope (c) on large (LI) and small (SI) Mediterranean islands. A two-way ANOVA was conducted to detect differences between the two groups of islands and among sites in a and b; data are the mean of six sites (±1SE) and of ten plots (±1SE), respectively; different lowercase letters show significant differences at p < 0.05 (SNK test). In c a χ2 test with a G-test of heterogeneity were conducted to detect differences between the two groups of islands and among sites, respectively. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3. Mean elevation (a), distance from the sea (b) and slope (c) on large (LI) and small (SI) Mediterranean islands. A two-way ANOVA was conducted to detect differences between the two groups of islands and among sites in a and b; data are the mean of six sites (±1SE) and of ten plots (±1SE), respectively; different lowercase letters show significant differences at p < 0.05 (SNK test). In c a χ2 test with a G-test of heterogeneity were conducted to detect differences between the two groups of islands and among sites, respectively. *** p < 0.001.
Plants 10 02298 g003
Plants 10 02298 g004 550
Figure 4. Number of point contacts (presence) with features associated with (low–high) drainage (a), and with stones (b), rock (c), sand (d), soil (e) and litter (f) on large (LI) and small (SI) Mediterranean islands, and in each site. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001; ns = not significant.
Figure 4. Number of point contacts (presence) with features associated with (low–high) drainage (a), and with stones (b), rock (c), sand (d), soil (e) and litter (f) on large (LI) and small (SI) Mediterranean islands, and in each site. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001; ns = not significant.
Plants 10 02298 g004
Plants 10 02298 g005 550
Figure 5. Biodiversity indexes (Shannon index (a), number of species (b) and Pielou’s Evenness index (c)) for populations on large (LI) and small (SI) Mediterranean islands. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences at p < 0.05 (by SNK test).
Figure 5. Biodiversity indexes (Shannon index (a), number of species (b) and Pielou’s Evenness index (c)) for populations on large (LI) and small (SI) Mediterranean islands. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences at p < 0.05 (by SNK test).
Plants 10 02298 g005
Plants 10 02298 g006 550
Figure 6. Population structure of Silene velutina: mean number of individuals of vegetative plants (seedlings and juveniles), reproductive plants (adults) and total plants per plot on large (dark grey) and small (light grey) Mediterranean islands. A one-way ANOVA was performed to compare the number of individual islands in different age classes; different lowercase letters represent significant differences for each life stage (p < 0.05 by SNK test).
Figure 6. Population structure of Silene velutina: mean number of individuals of vegetative plants (seedlings and juveniles), reproductive plants (adults) and total plants per plot on large (dark grey) and small (light grey) Mediterranean islands. A one-way ANOVA was performed to compare the number of individual islands in different age classes; different lowercase letters represent significant differences for each life stage (p < 0.05 by SNK test).
Plants 10 02298 g006
Plants 10 02298 g007 550
Figure 7. Study area and study sites in the Mediterranean Sea (A,B). LI (large islands, in blue): Abt—Abbatoggia, La Maddalena; Agl—Riu di Li Saldi, Aglientu; Cbi—Casetta Bianca, Porto Vecchio; Src—Saint Roch, Bonifacio; Cfn—Capu di Fenu, Ajaccio; Tmr—Tamaricciu, Porto Vecchio. SI (small islands, in green): Ibc—Isolotto Baccà, La Maddalena; Ist1—Isolotto Stramanaro 1, La Maddalena; Ist2—Isolotto Stramanaro 2, La Maddalena; Icl—Isolotto Colombo, La Maddalena; Ipr—Isolotto Porro, La Maddalena; Ids—Ilot du Silene, Bonifacio (C).
Figure 7. Study area and study sites in the Mediterranean Sea (A,B). LI (large islands, in blue): Abt—Abbatoggia, La Maddalena; Agl—Riu di Li Saldi, Aglientu; Cbi—Casetta Bianca, Porto Vecchio; Src—Saint Roch, Bonifacio; Cfn—Capu di Fenu, Ajaccio; Tmr—Tamaricciu, Porto Vecchio. SI (small islands, in green): Ibc—Isolotto Baccà, La Maddalena; Ist1—Isolotto Stramanaro 1, La Maddalena; Ist2—Isolotto Stramanaro 2, La Maddalena; Icl—Isolotto Colombo, La Maddalena; Ipr—Isolotto Porro, La Maddalena; Ids—Ilot du Silene, Bonifacio (C).
Plants 10 02298 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Murru, V.; Farris, E.; Santo, A.; Grillo, O.; Piazza, C.; Gaio, A.; Bacchetta, G.; Thompson, J.D. Niche Differentiation at Multiple Spatial Scales on Large and Small Mediterranean Islands for the Endemic Silene velutina Pourr. ex Loisel. (Caryophyllaceae). Plants 2021, 10, 2298. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112298

AMA Style

Murru V, Farris E, Santo A, Grillo O, Piazza C, Gaio A, Bacchetta G, Thompson JD. Niche Differentiation at Multiple Spatial Scales on Large and Small Mediterranean Islands for the Endemic Silene velutina Pourr. ex Loisel. (Caryophyllaceae). Plants. 2021; 10(11):2298. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112298

Chicago/Turabian Style

Murru, Valentina, Emmanuele Farris, Andrea Santo, Oscar Grillo, Carole Piazza, Antonella Gaio, Gianluigi Bacchetta, and John D. Thompson. 2021. "Niche Differentiation at Multiple Spatial Scales on Large and Small Mediterranean Islands for the Endemic Silene velutina Pourr. ex Loisel. (Caryophyllaceae)" Plants 10, no. 11: 2298. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112298

APA Style

Murru, V., Farris, E., Santo, A., Grillo, O., Piazza, C., Gaio, A., Bacchetta, G., & Thompson, J. D. (2021). Niche Differentiation at Multiple Spatial Scales on Large and Small Mediterranean Islands for the Endemic Silene velutina Pourr. ex Loisel. (Caryophyllaceae). Plants, 10(11), 2298. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112298

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop