Next Article in Journal
Genome Size, Cytotype Diversity and Reproductive Mode Variation of Cotoneaster integerrimus (Rosaceae) from the Balkans
Next Article in Special Issue
In Silico Conformation of the Drug Colchicine into Tubulin Models and Acute Phytotoxic Activity on Cucumis sativus Radicles
Previous Article in Journal
Usefulness of Tree Species as Urban Health Indicators
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/plants10122800
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Toxicity of meta-Tyrosine

by
Marcin Tyminski
*,
Katarzyna Ciacka
,
Pawel Staszek
,
Agnieszka Gniazdowska
and
Urszula Krasuska
Department of Plant Physiology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(12), 2800; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122800
Submission received: 19 November 2021 / Revised: 10 December 2021 / Accepted: 13 December 2021 / Published: 17 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Toxicity Mechanisms of Phytotoxins)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
L-Tyrosine (Tyr) is one of the twenty proteinogenic amino acids and also acts as a precursor for secondary metabolites. Tyr is prone to modifications, especially under conditions of cellular redox imbalance. The oxidation of Tyr precursor phenylalanine leads to the formation of Tyr non-proteinogenic isomers, including meta-Tyr (m-Tyr), a marker of oxidative stress. The aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on m-Tyr toxicity. The direct m-Tyr mode of action is linked to its incorporation into proteins, resulting in their improper conformation. Furthermore, m-Tyr produced by some plants as an allelochemical impacts the growth and development of neighboring organisms. In plants, the direct harmful effect of m-Tyr is due to its modification of the proteins structure, whereas its indirect action is linked to the disruption of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species metabolism. In humans, the elevated concentration of m-Tyr is characteristic of various diseases and ageing. Indeed, m-Tyr is believed to play an important role in cancer physiology. Thus, since, in animal cells, m-Tyr is formed directly in response to oxidative stress, whereas, in plants, m-Tyr is also synthesized enzymatically and serves as a chemical weapon in plant–plant competition, the general concept of m-Tyr role in living organisms should be specified.

1. Introduction

Twenty canonical amino acids (AAs) are the base of the proteins structure in living organisms. Besides them, numerous non-proteinogenic amino acids (NPAAs) are produced in plants [1]. Some of the NPAAs are described as antimetabolites, analogs of proteinogenic AAs, and serve as toxins. The negative effect of a specific NPAA may be removed by the application of its proteinogenic analog.
Tyrosine (Tyr-α-amino-β-(p-hydroxyphenyl)propionic acid) belongs to the group of aromatic amino acids (AAAs), and occurs as two optical isomers (enantiomers) L-Tyr and D-Tyr [2]. Most living organisms utilize L-Tyr to form proteins/peptides. The content of this AA in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Henh.) leaves is about 5 pmol mg−1 fresh weight (FW) ([3] and citations herein). Tyr is a Phe derivative, with a hydroxyl group located in the para- position on the benzyl ring (p-Tyr) [4]. In proteins, Tyr residues are often located on the surface and are prone to various post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation or nitration [5]. In plants, AAAs are precursors for many secondary metabolites belonging to, e.g., groups of flavonoids, tannins or lignins [6], and alkaloids [6,7]. Although the main precursor for lignins biosynthesis is Phe, recent investigations on stiff brome (Brachypodium distachyon (L.) P.Beauv.) revealed that the synthesis of these compounds directly from Tyr is also possible [8,9]. As Tyr is implicated in the plastoquinones biosynthesis, its deficiency may disturb the electron transport chain in photosystems [4,10]. In plants, the increased concentration of Tyr is observed during the reaction against biotic stresses. The Tyr content in shimbillo (Inga umbellifera (Vahl) Steud. ex DC) expanding leaves is about 6.6 to 10% of the dry weight (DW), although, in mature leaves, it decreases to only 0.05% of the DW [11]. Herbivore attacks on this tropical legume tree increased the Tyr concentration in the leaves [12]. In response to herbivores, Coley et al. [13] correlated the Tyr accumulation in the young leaves of genus Inga to the overexpression of the genes encoding the enzymes of Tyr biosynthesis.
In sorgo (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench.), Tyr is a precursor in the synthesis of dhurrin, a cyanogenic glucoside, which has a defensive role against herbivores [14]. The toxicity of Tyr (mixture of L-Tyr and D-Tyr isomers) at elevated concentrations was confirmed for insects [11]. The adddition of the Tyr racemate (at the level of 4%) into the diet of the tobacco budworm (Heliothis virescens) completely inhibited larvae growth [11]. Ten times higher than the physiological concentration of L-Tyr in plasma led to severe brain damage and DNA damage in Wistar rats (Rattus norvegicus domestica), possibly because of an oxidative stress [15]. Such a toxic concentration of L-Tyr is observed in patients suffering from tyrosinemia type II [15].
The de novo synthesis of Tyr occurs only in plants and microbes. Chorismate, the final product of the shikimate pathway, is a precursor for Phe and Tyr biosynthesis in plants, bacteria, and fungi ([16] and references herein). In plants, chorismate mutase (CM) converts chorismate into prephenate, the main substrate for these AAs’ biosynthesis (Figure 1). Then, prephenate may be quickly transformed into arogenate in the reaction catalyzed by prephenate aminotransferase (PPA-AT), and further to Tyr by arogenate dehydrogenase (ADH). Another possible pathway of Tyr biosynthesis is the alteration of prephenate, in the presence of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP+), in the reaction catalyzed by prephenate dehydrogenase (PDH). The product, p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate (HPP), undergoes transamination into Tyr in the reaction catalyzed by Tyr aminotransferase (Tyr-AT) [4]. In plants, Phe and Tyr are synthesized mostly in plastids, and most likely exported to the cytosol via plastid located AAA-transporters [7,17]. Animals obtain Tyr from the diet; it has been demonstrated that Phe may be converted to p-Tyr in the reaction catalyzed by Phe hydroxylase [18].
The catabolism of Tyr is a multi-step process occurring mostly under stress conditions and senescence. It is suggested that it takes place in the cytosol ([3] and citations herein). The degradation of Tyr starts through its transamination into HPP by Tyr-AT (Figure 1). Next, the 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) converts HPP to homogentisate (HGA), a precursor for plastoquinones or vitamin E [19]. The formation of HGA in the AAs’ degradation pathway is followed by the conversion into maleylacetoacetate by homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase (HGO). The role of maleylacetoacetate isomerase (MAAI) is to produce fumarylacetoacetate—the next intermediate of Tyr catabolism. The degradation of Tyr in the oxidative pathway ends with the release of the acetoacetate and fumarate from fumarylacetoacetate in the reaction catalyzed by fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase (FAH) [4]. Further, these compounds can be reintegrated into the shikimate pathway (Figure 1).

2. Tyrosine Structural Isomers: meta-, ortho-, para-Tyr

Depending on the location of a hydroxyl group in the benzyl ring, three structural Tyr isomers are described: (i) para-(p-Tyr), which is the most common product of metabolic reactions integrated into proteins; and (ii) meta-(m-Tyr) and (iii) ortho-(o-Tyr), which are both products of the oxidation of Phe, known also as markers of oxidative stress [18] (Figure 2). Although the o-Tyr has been proven to have a deteriorative effect in animal cells [20], its toxicity in plants is still not fully described.
Various biotic and abiotic stressors lead to the induction of oxidative stress in plants [21]. Oxidative stress is an imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants in favor of the oxidants, leading to a disruption of redox signaling and molecular damage [22]. Under the conditions of ROS over-accumulation, m-Tyr and o-Tyr may be formed non-enzymatically via Phe hydroxylation or oxidation. The hydroxyl radical attack on the Phe ring initiates a two-step process, producing the highly reactive hydroxyphenylalanine radical intermediate. The formation of a stable isomer from the intermediate terminates the reaction. The mechanism of the stable end product generation may be the result of one of three possible mechanisms: abstraction, oxygenation, or disproportionation ([18] and citations herein). Tyr non-proteinogenic isomers can also emerge during the exposure of Phe to highly energetic radiation or in the reaction with peroxynitrite (ONOO−), a compound formed from the superoxide anion (O2−) and nitric oxide (NO). The hydroxylation of Phe in the presence of ONOO− occurs partially via hydroxyl radicals formation [23].

3. Fescue as the Biological Source of m-Tyr

The genus of fescue (Festuca L.) includes about 450 species around the world [24]. Of agronomical importance are mainly fine leaf fescues (Festuca rubra L. spp. rubra, Festuca rubra L. spp. trichophylla Gaud., and spp. littoralis (Meyer) Auquiz), fescues forming clumps (Festuca rubra L. spp. commutata Gaud.), and sheep fescue (Festuca ovina L.) [25]. Fine leaf fescues were used as golf grasslands in the 16th century and are still typical for golf courses, sports fields, and lawns in temperate climate regions of North and South America and Europe [24]. The name “festuca” comes from the old Latin name “grass weed”. Fescues’ popularity is due to their high resistance to drought and low nitrogen demand; they do not require intensive care, while low sensitivity to lead allows their use nearby the communication routes [24]. Fescue grasslands do not contain other species characteristic for grassland habitats e.g., clover (Trifolium L. sp.), dandelion (Taraxacum F.H. Wigg. sp.), or daisies (Bellis L. sp.). This is because most of the fescues produce allelopathic compounds that inhibit the growth and development of neighboring plants. The use of fescue to reduce excess weeds in crops was intensively studied in the second half of the XX century. The water extracts of the dried shoots and roots of reed fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) inhibited the growth of black cabbage (Brassica nigra L.) [26] and negatively affected the seed germination, growth, and development of seedlings and the yield of trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) [27]. The application of an aqueous extract of fescue leaves resulted in the reduction of the yield of red clover (Trifolium pratensis L.) [28]. At the beginning of the 21st century, 78 species of fescue were examined, among which the seven most strongly limiting the weed infestation in field conditions were selected [25]. Further laboratory analyses have shown that the allelopathic potential of fescues corresponds to their root exudates. Fescues’ shoot extract inhibited the root growth of cress seedlings (Lepidium sativum L.) in 40%, while the root exudates limited the growth in 70% [25]. The main fescues’ root exudates component is m-Tyr, and the highest content of m-Tyr was recorded in the exudates of F. rubra spp. commutata and F. rubra spp. rubra [25]. The content of m-Tyr in the roots of fescue seedlings (about 6500 pmol mg−1 FW) was about 10 times higher than in leaves (590 pmol mg−1 FW). In dry seeds, m-Tyr was present at a much lower concentration, about 24 pmol mg−1 FW [29]. In fescues, epidermal cells of the root apex are responsible for the synthesis and release of exudates containing m-Tyr into the environment [25]. Fescues tolerate the presence of m-Tyr in the tissues possibly through its accumulation in intracellular or intercellular spaces [30]. The half-life of m-Tyr is rather short; it is estimated that, in filter paper bioassays, the m-Tyr half-life is less than 2 days and, in soil bioassays, less than 24 h [31].
Additionally, m-Tyr was detected in the donkey-tail spurge (Euphorbia myrsinites L.), but this plant does not exudate this NPAA into the environment [29]. As a secondary metabolite, m-Tyr is produced by some bacteria and may be a component of antibiotics, for example, pactamycin [32].
Contrary to the spontaneous formation under high ROS concentration, in fescues and donkey-tail spurge, m-Tyr is produced via enzymatic pathways by the transamination of m-hydroxyphenylpyruvate or the hydroxylation of Phe, respectively [33].

4. Mode of Action of m-Tyr

The direct mode of action linked to m-Tyr toxicity is its incorporation into the proteins, which alters physiological functionality [34]. In Escherichia coli, the incorporation occurs through the binding of m-Tyr to the tRNAPhe [35]. As was shown for bacteria and human cells, the cytoplasmic or mitochondrial aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are prone to catalyzing the binding of tRNAPhe with m-Tyr [36]; thus, Tyr isomers at higher concentrations compete with Phe for tRNAPhe ([37] and references herein).
The incorporation of m-Tyr into plant proteins was also demonstrated for 5-days-old arabidopsis seedlings [38]. The authors demonstrated that application of 10 μM m-Tyr reduced chlorophyll content, altered organellar biogenesis, and decreased photosynthesis and respiration rates.
As was mentioned, the toxicity of m-Tyr might be overcome by the Phe application. The recovery effect was described for tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seedlings [39] and confirmed for arabidopsis [38]. The mechanism of the recovery effect is most probably based on the competition between Phe and m-Tyr [29]. The resistance to m-Tyr observed in arabidopsis mutants was linked to the accumulation of free Phe in leaves due to the overexpression of the genes encoding ADH, one of the enzymes of the Phe synthesis pathway [40].
In tomato seedlings, the mechanism of toxicity of m-Tyr is linked to altered ROS metabolism [39,41]. The treatment of tomato seedlings with m-Tyr led to the overproduction of ROS and the accumulation of carbonylated proteins ([39,41] and citations herein). Carbonyl groups in proteins are considered as markers of oxidative stress and ageing [42]. Similar to m-Tyr, the mode of action has been proven for another NPAA–canavanine (L-2-amino-4-guanidooxy-butanoic acid–CAN). This arginine analog, found in some Fabaceae plants, is considered as a toxic compound, protecting plants against herbivores ([43] and references herein). The direct mode of action of CAN is similar to m-Tyr; CAN is incorporated into proteins producing aberrant molecules [44]. Moreover, CAN supplementation into the growing medium of tomato seedlings stimulated ROS accumulation in roots and increased the level of carbonylated proteins [45]. Furthermore, m-Tyr decreased the enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant activity in the roots of tomato seedlings [39] and decreased the generation of ONOO− [46]. This indicates, that besides the alteration of the ROS metabolism, m-Tyr has an impact on the reactive nitrogen species (RNS) content [41,46]. In plants, the biological action of RNS is linked to post-translational protein modifications, including Tyr nitration. The formation of 3-nitro-tyrosine (3-NT) occurs through the addition of a nitro group (-NO2) in the ortho position of the Tyr ring via covalent binding [47]. Such modified, nitrated proteins lose their function [48,49]. There are no data indicating the possibility of the prevention of free p-Tyr nitration due to the m-Tyr formation. May m-Tyr incorporated into the protein structure also be nitrated? Does it physiologically matter? These questions need further investigation.
Duke [30] suggested that the possible mechanism of m-Tyr toxicity in plant cells is that m-Tyr could be converted into dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA), a compound of physiological meaning. The currently described action of m-Tyr in plants, observed after the application of synthetic DL m-Tyr, has been summarized in Table 1.
The inhibition of the growth of Sacchromyces cerevisiae after the addition of m-Tyr into the growing media was observed [35]. In Escherichia coli, m-Tyr altered a major part of the proteome as misfolded proteins crowded and formed aggregates [50]. To prevent this kind of damage, bacteria have a protective mechanism against mischarged AA. The activity of some tRNA synthetases is regulated by the quality control system that hydrolyzes the invalid AA before or after binding with the tRNA [50]. In Escherichia coli cells lacking the tRNAPhe synthetase quality control, the exposure of m-Tyr led to protein aggregates accumulation. This was followed by the up-regulation of genes involved in the unfolded protein stress response [50].
The mode of action of m-Tyr in animals is mostly based on the incorporation of this NPAA into the proteins. This phenomenon was confirmed by Gurer-Orhan et al. [34] using radiolabeled m-Tyr added into the culture of hamster ovary cells. L-m-Tyr (0.2 mM) inhibited colony formation by 30% [34]. The simultaneous application of m-Tyr (0.2 mM) and Phe (1 mM) completely preserved the ability to proliferate. In humans, the elevated concentration of this Tyr isomer occurs in neurodegenerative diseases and diseases associated with oxidative stress and/or ageing: diabetes, artherosclerosis, and others ([18] and references herein) (Table 2). Moreover, m-Tyr can play a significant role in the cancer cells in animals. The concomitant tumor resistance is the phenomenon of the inhibition of secondary tumor implants or metastasis development in hosts that are already affected by the primary tumor [51]. Indeed, m-Tyr and o-Tyr were found to be factors leading to that resistance as they were discovered in the serum of tumor-bearing mice (Mus musculus). Administration of these NPAAs inhibited the growth of tumors in the murine models of cancer [52]. As was discussed, while secondary tumors are inhibited by circulating m-Tyr, the primary tumor microenvironment is protected by an accumulation of AA with counteracting properties (i.e. Phe) [53]. The primary tumor affected ROS generation, resulting in the increased m-Tyr and o-Tyr content [52]. This effect was observed in different human tumor types (prostate tumor, lung anaplastic, and nasopharyngeal carcinoma), where the application of m-Tyr led to the inhibition of cancer proliferation [54]. The treatment of cancer cells with m-Tyr induced the autophagy; however, the application of Phe reversed the toxic effect of m-Tyr on secondary cancer growth [52,54]. Studies on the key role of non-proteinogenic Tyr isomers in the mechanism of concomitant tumor resistance have shown an antiproliferative and anti-metastaic effect of m-Tyr [52,53,54]. These findings may be useful in the prevention of tumor metastasis. Moreover, m-Tyr can stop the growth of cells from tumor fragments that could have remained post-surgery. Importantly, for the therapeutic use of m-Tyr, no evidence of toxic effects of this NPAA at the concentration used for humans was found. After the oral application of 28 µmole m-Tyr kg−1 given to adults, the majority of the load was metabolized to 3-hydroxymandelic acid, 4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, and 3-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, detected in urine. In this experiment, no side effects have been observed [55]. Various examples of the m-Tyr mode of action in animals are presented in Table 2.
As was mentioned, exogeneous Phe might overcome the toxic effect of m-Tyr as the pool of free Phe in cells increases. An increased Phe level may be achieved by the inhibition of the activity of Phe hydroxylase (the enzyme responsible for Phe catabolism). On the other hand, the degradation of Tyr isomers may occur by the higher activity of Tyr-AT—the first enzyme in the Tyr catabolism pathway ([18] and citations herein). It was revealed that oxidative stress promotes the up-regulation of genes coding Tyr-AT in Caenorhabditis elegans [56]. The authors discussed that it might be the first step in the response against m-Tyr toxicity.

5. Summary

In animal cells, m-Tyr is formed as a product of Phe oxidation and thus is commonly accepted as a marker of the oxidative stress accompanying various pathological processes and diseases. In plants, besides Phe oxidation, m-Tyr is synthesized enzymatically, predominantly as a chemical weapon necessary for successful competition with neighbors in the environment. Despite the direct action of m-Tyr based on its incorporation into the protein structure, which is characteristic for both animal and plant tissues, there are several proofs that, in plants, m-Tyr alters the ROS and RNS metabolism [39,41].
Based on several data, the question as to why plants are more sensitive to m-Tyr than animals arose. According to previously published data, the Phe content in the leaves of arabidopsis is around 13.6 nmol g−1 FW [62], whereas the concentration of this AA in human skeletal muscles is about 2000-fold higher—around 46 µmol g−1 FW [63]. Such a difference in the Phe concentration may partially explain the m-Tyr toxicity in plants’ organs due to the limitation of the endogenous Phe necessary for the recovery effect. On the other hand, it may justify the existence of various enzymatic pathways of m-Tyr biosynthesis in plants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, U.K. and M.T.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T.; writing—review and editing, K.C., P.S., A.G. and U.K.; visualization, M.T.; supervision, U.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was performed during realization of the project financed by National Science Centre, Poland 2016/23/B/NZ9/03462 given to U.K.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vranova, V.; Rejsek, K.; Skene, K.R.; Formanek, P. Non-Protein Amino Acids: Plant, Soil and Ecosystem Interactions. Plant Soil 2011, 342, 31–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Grishin, D.V.; Zhdanov, D.D.; Pokrovskaya, M.V.; Sokolov, N.N. D-Amino Acids in Nature, Agriculture and Biomedicine. All Life 2020, 13, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Hildebrandt, T.M.; Nunes Nesi, A.; Araújo, W.L.; Braun, H.-P. Amino Acid Catabolism in Plants. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 1563–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Schenck, C.A.; Maeda, H.A. Tyrosine Biosynthesis, Metabolism, and Catabolism in Plants. Phytochemistry 2018, 149, 82–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Abello, N.; Kerstjens, H.A.M.; Postma, D.S.; Bischoff, R. Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Selectivity, Physicochemical and Biological Consequences, Denitration, and Proteomics Methods for the Identification of Tyrosine-Nitrated Proteins. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 3222–3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Santos-Sánchez, N.F.; Salas-Coronado, R.; Hernández-Carlos, B.; Villanueva-Cañongo, C. Shikimic Acid Pathway in Biosynthesis of Phenolic Compounds. In Plant Physiological Aspects of Phenolic Compounds; Soto-Hernández, M., García-Mateos, R., Palma-Tenango, M., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019; pp. 35–50. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, M.; Toda, K.; Maeda, H.A. Biochemical Properties and Subcellular Localization of Tyrosine Aminotransferases in Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytochemistry 2016, 132, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Barros, J.; Serrani-Yarce, J.C.; Chen, F.; Baxter, D.; Venables, B.J.; Dixon, R.A. Role of Bifunctional Ammonia-Lyase in Grass Cell Wall Biosynthesis. Nat. Plants 2016, 2, 16050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Maeda, H.A. Lignin Biosynthesis: Tyrosine Shortcut in Grasses. Nat. Plants 2016, 2, 16080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, M.; Lu, S. Plastoquinone and Ubiquinone in Plants: Biosynthesis, Physiological Function and Metabolic Engineering. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Lokvam, J.; Brenes-Arguedas, T.; Lee, J.S.; Coley, P.D.; Kursar, T.A. Allelochemic Function for a Primary Metabolite: The Case of L-Tyrosine Hyper-production in Inga umbellifera (Fabaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2006, 93, 1109–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Bixenmann, R.J.; Coley, P.D.; Weinhold, A.; Kursar, T.A. High Herbivore Pressure Favors Constitutive over Induced Defense. Ecol. Evol. 2016, 6, 6037–6049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Coley, P.D.; Endara, M.; Ghabash, G.; Kidner, C.A.; Nicholls, J.A.; Pennington, R.T.; Mills, A.G.; Soule, A.J.; Lemes, M.R.; Stone, G.N.; et al. Macroevolutionary Patterns in Overexpression of Tyrosine: An Anti-herbivore Defence in a Speciose Tropical Tree Genus. Inga (Fabaceae). J. Ecol. 2019, 107, 1620–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Laursen, T.; Borch, J.; Knudsen, C.; Bavishi, K.; Torta, F.; Martens, H.J.; Silvestro, D.; Hatzakis, N.S.; Wenk, M.R.; Dafforn, T.R.; et al. Characterization of a Dynamic Metabolon Producing the Defense Compound Dhurrin in Sorghum. Science 2016, 354, 890–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. De Prá, S.D.T.; Ferreira, G.K.; Carvalho-Silva, M.; Vieira, J.S.; Scaini, G.; Leffa, D.D.; Fagundes, G.E.; Bristot, B.N.; Borges, G.D.; Ferreira, G.C.; et al. L-Tyrosine Induces DNA Damage in Brain and Blood of Rats. Neurochem. Res. 2014, 39, 202–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tzin, V.; Galili, G. New Insights into the Shikimate and Aromatic Amino Acids Biosynthesis Pathways in Plants. Mol. Plant 2010, 3, 956–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Widhalm, J.R.; Gutensohn, M.; Yoo, H.; Adebesin, F.; Qian, Y.; Guo, L.; Jaini, R.; Lynch, J.H.; McCoy, R.M.; Shreve, J.T.; et al. Identification of a Plastidial Phenylalanine Exporter That Influences Flux Distribution through the Phenylalanine Biosynthetic Network. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ipson, B.R.; Fisher, A.L. Roles of the Tyrosine Isomers Meta-Tyrosine and Ortho-Tyrosine in Oxidative Stress. Ageing Res. Rev. 2016, 27, 93–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Parthasarathy, A.; Cross, P.J.; Dobson, R.C.J.; Adams, L.E.; Savka, M.A.; Hudson, A.O. A Three-Ring Circus: Metabolism of the Three Proteogenic Aromatic Amino Acids and Their Role in the Health of Plants and Animals. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2018, 5, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Molnár, G.A.; Kun, S.; Sélley, E.; Kertész, M.; Szélig, L.; Csontos, C.; Böddi, K.; Bogár, L.; Miseta, A.; Wittmann, I. Role of Tyrosine Isomers in Acute and Chronic Diseases Leading to Oxidative Stress-A Review. Curr. Med. Chem. 2016, 23, 667–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.B.; Parvin, K.; Bhuiyan, T.F.; Anee, T.I.; Nahar, K.; Hossen, M.S.; Zulfiqar, F.; Alam, M.M.; Fujita, M. Regulation of ROS Metabolism in Plants under Environmental Stress: A Review of Recent Experimental Evidence. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sies, H. On the History of Oxidative Stress: Concept and Some Aspects of Current Development. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 2018, 7, 122–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kaur, H.; Whiteman, M.; Halliwell, B. Peroxynitrite-Dependent Aromatic Hydroxylation and Nitration of Salicylate and Phenylalanine. Is Hydroxyl Radical Involved? Free Radic. Res. 1997, 26, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ruemmele, B.A.; Wipff, J.; Brilman, L.; Hignight, K. Fine-Leaved Fescue Species. In Turfgrass Biology, Genetics and Breeding; Casler, M.D., Duncan, R.R., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2003; pp. 129–174. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bertin, C.; Paul, R.N.; Duake, S.O.; Weston, L.A. Laboratory Assessment of the Allelopathic Effects of Fine Leaf Fescues. J. Chem. Ecol. 2003, 29, 1919–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Peters, E.J. Toxicity of Tall Fescue to Rape and Birdsfoot Trefoil Seeds and Seedlings. Crop Sci. 1968, 8, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Stephenson, R.; Posler, G. The Influence of Tall Fescue on the Germination, Seedling Growth and Yield of Birdsfoot Trefoil. Grass Forage Sci. 1988, 43, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Peters, E.J.; Mohammed Zam, A.H.B. Allelopathic Effects of Tall Fescue Genotypes. Agron. J. 1981, 73, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bertin, C.; Weston, L.A.; Huang, T.; Jander, G.; Owens, T.; Meinwald, J.; Schroeder, F.C. Grass Roots Chemistry: Meta-Tyrosine, an Herbicidal Nonprotein Amino Acid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 16964–16969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Duke, S.O. The Emergence of Grass Root Chemical Ecology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 16729–16730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Bertin, C.; Harmon, R.; Akaogi, M.; Weidenhamer, J.D.; Weston, L.A. Assessment of the Phytotoxic Potential of m-Tyrosine in Laboratory Soil Bioassays. J. Chem. Ecol. 2009, 35, 1288–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhang, W.; Ames, B.D.; Walsh, C.T. Identification of Phenylalanine 3-Hydroxylase for Meta-Tyrosine Biosynthesis. Biochemistry 2011, 50, 5401–5403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Huang, T.; Rehak, L.; Jander, G. Meta-Tyrosine in Festuca rubra Ssp. commutata (Chewings Fescue) Is Synthesized by Hydroxylation of Phenylalanine. Phytochemistry 2012, 75, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gurer-Orhan, H.; Ercal, N.; Mare, S.; Pennathur, S.; Orhan, H.; Heinecke, J.W. Misincorporation of Free m-Tyrosine into Cellular Proteins: A Potential Cytotoxic Mechanism for Oxidized Amino Acids. Biochem. J. 2006, 395, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Bullwinkle, T.J.; Reynolds, N.M.; Raina, M.; Moghal, A.; Matsa, E.; Rajkovic, A.; Kayadibi, H.; Fazlollahi, F.; Ryan, C.; Howitz, N.; et al. Oxidation of Cellular Amino Acid Pools Leads to Cytotoxic Mistranslation of the Genetic Code. Elife 2014, 3, e02501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Klipcan, L.; Moor, N.; Kessler, N.; Safro, M.G. Eukaryotic Cytosolic and Mitochondrial Phenylalanyl-tRNA Synthetases Catalyze the Charging of tRNA with the Meta-Tyrosine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 11045–11048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Rodgers, K.J.; Samardzic, K.; Main, B.J. Toxic Nonprotein Amino Acids. In Plant Toxins. Toxicology; Gopalakrishnakone, P., Regina Carlini, C., Ligabue-Braun, R., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 263–285. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zer, H.; Mizrahi, H.; Malchenko, N.; Avin-Wittenberg, T.; Klipcan, L.; Ostersetzer-Biran, O. The Phytotoxicity of Meta-Tyrosine Is Associated with Altered Phenylalanine Metabolism and Misincorporation of This Non-Proteinogenic Phe-Analog to the Plant’s Proteome. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Andrzejczak, O.; Krasuska, U.; Olechowicz, J.; Staszek, P.; Ciacka, K.; Bogatek, R.; Hebelstrup, K.; Gniazdowska, A. Destabilization of ROS Metabolism in Tomato Roots as a Phytotoxic Effect of Meta-Tyrosine. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 123, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Huang, T.; Tohge, T.; Lytovchenko, A.; Fernie, A.R.; Jander, G. Pleiotropic Physiological Consequences of Feedback-Insensitive Phenylalanine Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2010, 63, 823–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Staszek, P.; Gniazdowska, A. Peroxynitrite Induced Signaling Pathways in Plant Response to Non-Proteinogenic Amino Acids. Planta 2020, 252, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ciacka, K.; Tymiński, M.; Gniazdowska, A.; Krasuska, U. Carbonylation of Proteins—An Element of Plant Ageing. Planta 2020, 252, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Staszek, P.; Weston, L.A.; Ciacka, K.; Krasuska, U.; Gniazdowska, A. L-Canavanine: How Does a Simple Non-Protein Amino Acid Inhibit Cellular Function in a Diverse Living System? Phytochem. Rev. 2017, 16, 1269–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rosenthal, G.A. L-Canavanine: A Higher Plant Insecticidal Allelochemical. Amino Acids 2001, 21, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Krasuska, U.; Andrzejczak, O.; Staszek, P.; Bogatek, R.; Gniazdowska, A. Canavanine Alters ROS/RNS Level and Leads to Post-Translational Modification of Proteins in Roots of Tomato Seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Krasuska, U.; Andrzejczak, O.; Staszek, P.; Borucki, W.; Gniazdowska, A. Meta-Tyrosine Induces Modification of Reactive Nitrogen Species Level, Protein Nitration and Nitrosoglutathione Reductase in Tomato Roots. Nitric Oxide 2017, 68, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Bartesaghi, S.; Radi, R. Fundamentals on the Biochemistry of Peroxynitrite and Protein Tyrosine Nitration. Redox Biol. 2018, 14, 618–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Staszek, P.; Krasuska, U.; Otulak-Kozieł, K.; Fettke, J.; Gniazdowska, A. Canavanine Induced Decrease in NO Synthesis Alters Activity of Antioxidant System but Does Not Impact GSNO Catabolism in Tomato Roots. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Staszek, P.; Krasuska, U.; Ciacka, K.; Gniazdowska, A. ROS Metabolism Perturbation as an Element of Mode of Action of Allelochemicals. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Howitz, N.; Su, T.; Lazazzera, B.A. Meta-Tyrosine Induces Cytotoxic Misregulation of Metabolism in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 2020, 432, 166716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Chiarella, P.; Bruzzo, J.; Meiss, R.P.; Ruggiero, R.A. Concomitant Tumor Resistance. Cancer Lett. 2012, 324, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ruggiero, R.A.; Bruzzo, J.; Chiarella, P.; di Gianni, P.; Isturiz, M.A.; Linskens, S.; Speziale, N.; Meiss, R.P.; Bustuoabad, O.D.; Pasqualini, C.D. Tyrosine Isomers Mediate the Classical Phenomenon of Concomitant Tumor Resistance. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 7113–7124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Ruggiero, R.A.; Bruzzo, J.; Chiarella, P.; Bustuoabad, O.D.; Meiss, R.P.; Pasqualini, C.D. Concomitant Tumor Resistance: The Role of Tyrosine Isomers in the Mechanisms of Metastases Control. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 1043–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Gueron, G.; Anselmino, N.; Chiarella, P.; Ortiz, E.G.; Lage Vickers, S.; Paez, A.V.; Giudice, J.; Contin, M.D.; Leonardi, D.; Jaworski, F.; et al. Game-Changing Restraint of ROS-Damaged Phenylalanine, upon Tumor Metastasis. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Fell, V.; Greenway, A.M.; Hoskins, J.A. The Metabolism of L-m-Tyrosine in Man. Biochem. Med. 1979, 22, 246–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ipson, B.R.; Green, R.A.; Wilson, J.T.; Watson, J.N.; Faull, K.F.; Fisher, A.L. Tyrosine Aminotransferase Is Involved in the Oxidative Stress Response by Metabolizing Meta-Tyrosine in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 9536–9554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Molnár, G.A.; Nemes, V.; Biró, Z.; Ludány, A.; Wagner, Z.; Wittmann, I. Accumulation of the Hydroxyl Free Radical Markers Meta-, Ortho-Tyrosine and DOPA in Cataractous Lenses Is Accompanied by a Lower Protein and Phenylalanine Content of the Water-Soluble Phase. Free Radic. Res. 2005, 39, 1359–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ogihara, T.; Hirano, K.; Ogihara, H.; Misaki, K.; Hiroi, M.; Morinobu, T.; Kim, H.-S.; Ogawa, S.; Ban, R.; Hasegawa, M.; et al. Non-Protein-Bound Transition Metals and Hydroxyl Radical Generation in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Newborn Infants with Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy. Pediatr. Res. 2003, 53, 594–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Kaur, H.; Edmonds, S.E.; Blake, D.R.; Halliwell, B. Hydroxyl Radical Generation by Rheumatoid Blood and Knee Joint Synovial Fluid. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1996, 55, 915–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Molnár, G.A. Tyrosine Isomers and Hormonal Signaling: A Possible Role for the Hydroxyl Free Radical in Insulin Resistance. World J. Diabetes 2015, 6, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Mikolás, E.; Kun, S.; Laczy, B.; Molnár, G.A.; Sélley, E.; Koszegi, T.; Wittmann, I. Incorporation of Ortho- and Meta-Tyrosine into Cellular Proteins Leads to Erythropoietin-Resistance in an Erythroid Cell Line. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2013, 38, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Voll, L.M.; Allaire, E.E.; Fiene, G.; Weber, A.P.M. The Arabidopsis Phenylalanine Insensitive Growth Mutant Exhibits a Deregulated Amino Acid Metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136, 3058–3069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Kaufman, S. A Model of Human Phenylalanine Metabolism in Normal Subjects and in Phenylketonuric Patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 3160–3164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Plants 10 02800 g001 550
Figure 1. Tyr synthesis (solid line) and Tyr catabolism (dashed line). Enzymes: chorismate mutase (CM), prephenate aminotransferase (PPA-AT), arogenate dehydrogenase (ADH), prephenate dehydrogenase (PDH), Tyr aminotransferase (Tyr-AT), 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD), homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase (HGO), maleylacetoacetate isomerase (MAAI), fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase (FAH). Substrates or products: p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate (HPP), homogentisate (HGA). According to [4] with some modifications.
Figure 1. Tyr synthesis (solid line) and Tyr catabolism (dashed line). Enzymes: chorismate mutase (CM), prephenate aminotransferase (PPA-AT), arogenate dehydrogenase (ADH), prephenate dehydrogenase (PDH), Tyr aminotransferase (Tyr-AT), 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD), homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase (HGO), maleylacetoacetate isomerase (MAAI), fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase (FAH). Substrates or products: p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate (HPP), homogentisate (HGA). According to [4] with some modifications.
Plants 10 02800 g001
Plants 10 02800 g002 550
Figure 2. Structural isomers of Tyr: para-Tyr, meta-Tyr, ortho-Tyr.
Figure 2. Structural isomers of Tyr: para-Tyr, meta-Tyr, ortho-Tyr.
Plants 10 02800 g002
Table
Table 1. Action of m-Tyr in various plants. Information on the methods/analytical procedure used in the experiments is given in parentheses.
Table 1. Action of m-Tyr in various plants. Information on the methods/analytical procedure used in the experiments is given in parentheses.
Plant Material,
m-Tyr Concentration		Effect of m-Tyr Application References
Lettuce
(Lactuca sativa L.)
(DL-m-Tyr: 10–320 µM)		Inhibition of root growth
(filter paper bioassays, soil bioassays)		[29,31]
Tomato
(Solanum lycopersicum L.)
(DL-m-Tyr: 50–250 µM)		Inhibition of root growth
(filter paper bioassays)
Accumulation of ROS
(spectrophotometry)
Increased emission of NO
(fluorimetry)
Modification of enzymatic and nonenzymatic cellular
antioxidant system
(spectrophotometry)
Increased protein carbonylation level and protein nitration level
(ELISA)		[39,46]
Arabidopsis
(Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia (Col-0))
(DL-m-Tyr: 2.5–320 µM, according to personal information)		Inhibition of root growth and decreased leaves number
(agar plate bioassays)
Decreased total chlorophyll content (spectrophotometry), aberration in chloroplast ultrastructure (TEM), lowered
photosynthesis rate (Clark-type electrode)
Modification of mitochondria structure (TEM), lowered respiration rate (Clark-type electrode)		[38]
Table
Table 2. Examples of pathophysiological effects related to the presence or application of m-Tyr in animal cells. Information on the methods/analytical procedure used in the experiments is given in parentheses.
Table 2. Examples of pathophysiological effects related to the presence or application of m-Tyr in animal cells. Information on the methods/analytical procedure used in the experiments is given in parentheses.
Tissue/Biological MaterialLevel of m-TyrPhysiological Effect
Linked to m-Tyr and Accompanied Biochemical Changes		References
Human lenses20.3 nmol g−1 proteinCataract related with the lower content of soluble proteins (spectrophotometry) and Phe (HPLC)[57]
Cerebrospinal fluid of newborn
infants		20.5 nMHypoxic ischemic encephalopathy related with the increased content of ascorbic acid (HPLC), the higher
ortho-Tyr/Phe and m-Tyr/Phe ratio (GC/MS), and the detection of
non-protein-bound iron
(spectrophotometry)		[58]
Human synovial fluid0.5–3.5 µMRheumatoid arthritis. Determination of hydroxyradical attack on Phe (HPLC)[59]
Human tumors (prostate, murine mammary carcinomas) in mice* Injection of m-Tyr
(67 mg kg−1 day−1)		Inhibition of the implantation of
metastases
(all treated and control mice were killed and metastases were counted)		[54]
T-lymphoma in BALB/c mice* Injection of m-Tyr
(0.2 mL of 500 μg mL−1 m-Tyr, daily for 5 days)		Decrease of tumor volume (histopathologic studies), the low expression of proliferation marker Ki-67 protein (immunostaining)[52]
TF-1 erythroblast cell culture* Treatment with m-Tyr
(20 mg L−1)		Inhibition of cells proliferation (Bürker cell counting chamber)
Induction of erythropoietin
resistance (erythropoietin-response, cell counting)		[60,61]
* no information about used optical isomers.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tyminski, M.; Ciacka, K.; Staszek, P.; Gniazdowska, A.; Krasuska, U. Toxicity of meta-Tyrosine. Plants 2021, 10, 2800. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122800

AMA Style

Tyminski M, Ciacka K, Staszek P, Gniazdowska A, Krasuska U. Toxicity of meta-Tyrosine. Plants. 2021; 10(12):2800. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122800

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tyminski, Marcin, Katarzyna Ciacka, Pawel Staszek, Agnieszka Gniazdowska, and Urszula Krasuska. 2021. "Toxicity of meta-Tyrosine" Plants 10, no. 12: 2800. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122800

APA Style

Tyminski, M., Ciacka, K., Staszek, P., Gniazdowska, A., & Krasuska, U. (2021). Toxicity of meta-Tyrosine. Plants, 10(12), 2800. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122800

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop