Next Article in Journal
Climate-Driven Plant Response and Resilience on the Tibetan Plateau in Space and Time: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Cellular Phosphorylation Signaling and Gene Expression in Drought Stress Responses: ABA-Dependent and ABA-Independent Regulatory Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Chlorella sorokiniana Growth in Anaerobic Digester Effluent
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 10
Issue 3
10.3390/plants10030479
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genomic Characterization and Expression Analysis of the SnRK Family Genes in Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo (Orchidaceae)

by
Yue Wang
1,2 and
Aizhong Liu
3,*
1
Key Laboratory of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Yunnan Key Laboratory for Wild Plant Resources, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
2
Bio-Innovation Center of DR PLANT, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
3
Key Laboratory for Forest Resources Conservation and Utilization in the Southwest Mountains of China, Ministry of Education, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(3), 479; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10030479
Submission received: 30 January 2021 / Revised: 24 February 2021 / Accepted: 26 February 2021 / Published: 3 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Protein Kinases and Plant Stress Response)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Sucrose non-fermenting1-related protein kinases (SnRKs) are a type of Ser/Thr protein kinases, and they play an important role in plant life, especially in metabolism and responses to environmental stresses. However, there is limited information on SnRK genes in Dendrobium officinale. In the present research, a total of 36 DoSnRK genes were identified based on genomic data. These DoSnRKs could be grouped into three subfamilies, including 1 member of DoSnRK1, 7 of DoSnRK2, and 28 of DoSnRK3. The gene structure analysis of DoSnRK genes showed that 17 members had no introns, while 16 members contained six or more introns. The conserved domains and motifs were found in the same subfamily. The various cis-elements present in the promoter regions showed that DoSnRK genes could respond to stresses and hormones. Furthermore, the expression patterns of DoSnRK genes in eight tissues were investigated according to RNA sequencing data, indicating that multiple DoSnRK genes were ubiquitously expressed in these tissues. The transcript levels of DoSnRK genes after drought, MeJA, and ABA treatments were analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR and showed that most DoSnRK genes could respond to these stresses. Therefore, genomic characterization and expression analyses provide valuable information on DoSnRK genes for further understanding the functions of SnRKs in plants.

1. Introduction

Protein kinases are important regulators in response to stresses that can activate downstream genes in different signal pathways through phosphorylation [1,2]. One of the well-known kinases is the sucrose nonfermenting1 (SNF1) kinase that is widely found in living organisms, including the SNF1 protein in yeast, the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) in mammals, and the sucrose non-fermenting1-related protein kinase (SnRK) in plants [2,3]. Studies have showed that SnRKs play vital roles in plant growth and development, especially in stress responses and global metabolism [1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9].
In plants, SnRK proteins can be divided into three subfamilies based on the sequences and structures, including SnRK1, SnRK2, and SnRK3 [10,11]. The SnRK1 subfamily contains a highly conserved protein kinase (Pkinase) domain at the N-terminus, which is the homolog of SNF1 in yeast and AMPKs in mammals [3]. SnRK2 and SnRK3 subfamilies are specific to plants and contain more members than the SnRK1 subfamily. SnRK2 and SnRK3 subfamilies are thought to evolve from SnRK1 and form more functions during evolution [12]. The SnRK2 subfamily contains a kinase domain and an ATP-binding domain. According to the dependence on abscisic acid (ABA), the SnRK2 subfamily can be classified into three groups [2]. The members of group 1 are independent of ABA, the members of group 2 are independent or weakly dependent on ABA, while the members of group 3 are strongly dependent on ABA [2,13]. The SnRK3 subfamily can bind to calcineurin B-like (CBL) proteins and participate in the stress response through the Ca2+ pathway, and therefore, SnRK3 proteins are called calcineurin B-like calcium sensor-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) [2]. Except for a protein kinase domain at the N-terminus, SnRK3 proteins contain Asn-Ala-Phe (NAF) domains and protein–protein interaction (PPI) domains at the C-terminus. The NAF domain is named due to the prominent presence of conserved Asn-Ala-Phe amino acids and is responsible for interactions with CBL proteins, while the PPI domain is responsible for interactions with phosphatase 2C [14].
The functions of SnRK1, SnRK2, and SnRK3 in plants have been investigated and shown to diverge often. SnRK1 is thought to be an essential energy sensor in plants to regulate global metabolism [7,15]. In potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), SnRK1 was demonstrated to regulate the gene expression level and activity of sucrose synthase, which showed its important role in carbohydrate metabolism [15]. The decreased activity of SnRK1 in pea (Pisum sativum) resulted in more sucrose accumulation, with defects in seed maturation [14]. SnRK1s can directly phosphorylate some enzymes in different metabolic pathways, such as hydroxy-3-methyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase, sucrose phosphate synthase, and trehalose phosphate synthase [2]. Other functions of SnRK1 have been recently reported [16]. OsSnRK1a conferred broad-spectrum resistance through regulation of the salicylic acid and jasmonic acid pathways in rice [17]. Overexpression of soybean GmSnRK1.1 resulted in increased resistance to Phytophthora sojae, while silencing GmSnRK1.1 reduced its resistance [18]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, SnRK1 positively regulated somatic embryogenesis, seed yield, and growth under high temperature through phosphorylation of FUSCA3, a transcription factor [19].
SnRK2 has been extensively studied, and it has been demonstrated that it is involved in the ABA signaling pathway, glucose metabolism, and various stresses [4,6,11,20,21]. In particular, as an essential factor in the ABA pathway, it plays an important role in the regulation of stomatal closure, flowering time, seed development, and dormancy [22,23]. The first reported SnRK2 gene (PKABA1) was identified in wheat, which was triggered by ABA and dehydration [2]. It has been confirmed that three SnRK2 members (AtSnRK2.2, AtSnRK2.3, and AtSnRK2.6) in Arabidopsis participate in the ABA signaling pathway and function in response to water stress [24]. The seedlings of the triple-knockout mutant snrk2.2/2.3/2.6 were not sensitive to ABA, featuring phenotypes of early flowering and producing less seeds [25]. AtSnRK2.6 (AtOST1) phosphorylates INDUCER OF CBF EXPRESSION1 (ICE1) and enhances its stability and transcription, which results in stronger cold tolerance [9]. Overexpression of AtSnRK2.6 enhances the metabolism of sucrose and fatty acids in leaves, which facilitates physiological processes [4]. SnRK2 genes can be induced by ABA, salt, and other stresses [4]. Overexpression of SnRK2 genes from different species in Arabidopsis and tobaccos can improve tolerance to drought and/or salt in transgenic plants [26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. For example, transgenic tobaccos with overexpression of TaSnRK2.9 showed a significant increase in tolerance to salt and drought stress through stronger abilities to conduct reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging, ABA signal transduction, and specific interaction between SnRKs and ABA-responsive element (ABRE)-binding factor (ABF) [33].
SnRK3 proteins can interact with CBL proteins to form a calcium signaling complex, which plays an important role in response to various stresses, including salt, drought, cold, and ABA [34]. The most famous function of SnRK3s (CIPKs) is as important components in the salt overly sensitive (SOS) pathway in Arabidopsis. Salt overly sensitive2 (SOS2; AtSnRK3.11) and SOS3 (CBL4) interact to form a complex, which can moderate the gene expression and activity of SOS1, a Na+/H+ exchanger in the plasma membrane [2,35]. Although the functions of SnRKs in plants have been deeply investigated, detailed functions could vary across different plant species. Therefore, it is necessary to dissect their functions in different types of plants.
Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo (also known as D. catenatum Lindl.) is an epiphytic plant in the family Orchidaceae. D. officinale has been used as a traditional medicinal plant in China and is also valued as an ornamental plant. D. officinale plants contain abundant polysaccharides as well as other metabolites, including alkaloids and bibenzyl compounds, which have been shown to be bioactive in immune modulation, as well as having anticancer and anti-oxidant properties, among others [36,37,38]. D. officinale plants prefer to grow in hot tropical areas and show strong resistance to stresses, particularly to drought [37]. Although SnRK members have been identified in various plants, such as Arabidopsis [10,39], apple [40], Brachypodium distachyon L. [41], Eucalyptus grandis [16], strawberry [12], and Brassica napus [42], there is no report on the SnRK family in orchid plants. In the present research, a comprehensive investigation of the SnRK family in D. officinale was carried out. A total of 36 DoSnRK members were identified, and their phylogenetic relationship was analyzed. The conserved domains and motifs, exon–intron structures, as well as the cis-elements in the promoter regions were characterized. The expression profiles of DoSnRK genes across eight tissues were analyzed based on transcriptomic data. The transcript levels of some DoSnRK genes under drought and hormone treatments were examined using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Therefore, the results provide important information on the SnRK family genes and pave the way for further understanding their functions in D. officinale.

2. Results

2.1. Genome-Wide Identification of DoSnRK Members in Dendrobium officinale

A total of 36 SnRK members, including 1 SnRK1, 7 SnRK2s, and 28 SnRK3s, were identified from the genome database of D. officinale using hidden Markov model (HMM). According to the conserved domains and nomenclature in Arabidopsis, they were named DoSnRK1.1, DoSnRK2.1 to DoSnRK2.7, and DoSnRK3.1 to DoSnRK3.28. Because the genome of D. officinale is presently assembled to the scaffold level, these 36 DoSnRK genes were distributed across 30 scaffolds. Basic information is presented in Table 1. The coding sequence (CDS) lengths of DoSnRKs are 1005–1530 bp. DoSnRK1.1 encodes the longest protein of 509 aa, while deduced proteins of DoSnRK2s have 334–387aa, and those of DoSnRK3 have 417–502 aa. The molecular weights of DoSnRK proteins are 37.87–58.01 kD, and isoelectric points are 4.77–9.37. The predicted subcellular localization showed that DoSnRK1.1 and most DoSnRK2 members were localized in the cytoplasm and nucleus, while most DoSnRK3 members were cytoplasmic, nuclear, and mitochondrial. Two members (DoSnRK3.10 and DoSnRK3.11) were at the endoplasmic reticulum.

2.2. Phylogenetic Relationship of DoSnRK Proteins

To analyze the phylogenetic relationship of SnRK proteins from D. officinale and Arabidopsis, an unrooted tree was constructed using MEGA 7.0 with the neighbor-joining (NJ) method (Figure 1). These 75 SnRK proteins were clearly grouped into three subfamilies: SnRK1, SnRK2, and SnRK3. The SnRK1 subfamily contained the fewest members, including one DoSnRK1 and three AtSnRK1 members. The SnRK2 subfamily consisted of 7 DoSnRK2 and 10 AtSnRK2 members, while The SnRK3 subfamily had the most members, including 28 DoSnRK3 proteins and 26 AtSnRK3 proteins. It was found that most of the DoSnRK proteins had corresponding homologs in Arabidopsis. The members of each subfamily from both species closely clustered, which suggests that these genes emerged before the two species diverged. Moreover, some SnRK members within species clustered together, implying expansion after speciation.

2.3. Gene Structures and Conserved Motifs of DoSnRK Genes

The gene structure could facilitate understanding of gene evolution. The exon-intron structures of 36 DoSnRK genes were analyzed with the GSGD. As shown in Figure 2, all the members of DoSnRK1 and DoSnRK2 subfamilies contained eight introns. Members from the DoSnRK3 subfamily varied in intron numbers and were divided into two types, one intron-free type and one intron-rich type. There were as many as 17 DoSnRK3 genes without introns. Eight DoSnRK3 genes contained 12–14 introns, and the rest of the three DoSnRK3 genes harbored 1, 2, and 6 introns, respectively.
Multiple alignments of DoSnRK protein sequences showed that conserved domains were present (Figure 3). The highly conserved kinase domain was found in all the DoSnRK proteins, while less conserved and distinct domains were also found, including the ATP-binding domain and Domain I in DoSnRK2 members, while the NAF and PPI domains were found in the C-terminus of DoSnRK3 proteins.
To further reveal the structure of DoSnRK and AtSnRK proteins, 10 conserved motifs were searched with Multiple EM for Motif Elicitation (MEME). It was found that these 10 motifs were widely distributed in these proteins (Figure 4). Among them, eight motifs (motifs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, and 10) were present in all the DoSnRK members, with an exception of DoSnRK3.6, which lacked motif 4. Among them, motifs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 9 consisted of the protein kinase domain. DoSnRK1.1 contained nine motifs, without motif 8. All members of the DoSnRK2 subfamily had eight motifs and lacked motif 7 and motif 8. In the DoSnRK3 subfamily, 21 members contained 10 motifs, while 4 members did not include motif 8. Most members of AtSnRK proteins in the same subfamily contained the same motifs as DoSnRK proteins.

2.4. Cis-Elements in the Promoter Regions of DoSnRK Genes

The cis-element plays an important role in the control of gene expression. To explore the potential regulatory factors, cis-elements in 2 kb of the promoter regions of DoSnRK genes were predicted (Table S1). The most frequent cis-elements were ethylene-responsive elements (ERE) and G-box, and they were present in the promoter regions of 27 and 28 DoSnRK genes, respectively, indicating that they could respond to ethylene and light. Other hormone-responsive elements such as CGTCA-motif, ABA-responsive element (ABRE), and TCA-element were found in the promoter regions of 25, 28, and 15 DoSnRK genes, respectively, which can respond to methyl jasmonate (MeJA), ABA, and salicylic acid, responsively. The other cis-elements involved in stress responses were also predicted in the promoter regions of DoSnRK genes, including anaerobic responsiveness element (ARE) in 28 DoSnRKs, the wound (WUN)-motif in 19 DoSnRKs, MYB binding site (MBS) in 15 DoSnRKs, and low temperature responsiveness (LTR) in 15 DoSnRKs. These cis-elements are responsible for stresses, including anaerobic, wounding, drought, and low temperature, respectively.

2.5. Expression Analysis of DoSnRK Genes in Eight Tissues

The expression profiles of 36 DoSnRK genes were investigated in eight tissues according to previous transcriptomic data. The tested tissues included the column, flower bud, lip, sepal, leaf, stem, white root, and green root tip. In orchid flowers, the column is the reproductive organ including the gynoecium (female organ) and androecium (male organ) and the lip is a highly specialized petal. Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million Fragments (FPKM) were used to determine levels of gene expression. Three DoSnRK members (DoSnRK3.6, DoSnRK3.20, and DoSnRK3.27) were hardly detectable in any of the eight tissues due to very low FPKM values (less than 2), while other 33 DoSnRK genes were expressed in at least one tissue with FPKM values of more than 2. The heatmaps of DoSnRK genes were constructed using the R language (Figure 5). According to the expression patterns, these genes could be clustered into six groups.
Group I contained five members from the SnRK3 subfamily, including DoSnRK3.12, DoSnRK3.16, DoSnRK3.18, DoSnRK3.24, and DoSnRK3.28. They were mainly expressed in roots and flower tissues with low transcripts, while no transcript could be found in the stem or leaves. Most of them showed slightly higher expression in the white root than in the green root tip. DoSnRK3.16 had abundant transcripts in the column and sepal, especially in the column with an FPKM of 239.56. Group II contained five members from the SnRK3 subfamily (DoSnRK3.3, DoSnRK3.5, DoSnRK3.10, DoSnRK3.13, and DoSnRK3.14). They showed moderate expression levels in various tissues with FPKM values of less than 25.89. Group III consisted of six members, including DoSnRK2.3 and five members from the SnRK3 subfamily. These six genes were expressed in all the eight tissues, and most of the members showed medium transcripts and the FPKM was between 5.67 and 54.06. Group IV contained 15 members, including DoSnRK1.1, 6 from the SnRK2 subfamily, and 8 from the SnRK3 subfamily. Most genes from this group showed extensive expression in eight tissues, while a few genes were lowly expressed in certain tissues. Group V included three genes (DoSnRK3.6, DoSnRK3.7, and DoSnRK3.17). DoSnRK3.17 was expressed only in the lip tissue with a low level and not expressed in other tissues. The remaining two genes were not expressed or expressed with very low transcripts in all the tissue. Group VI had two members, DoSnRK3.20 and DoSnRK3.27, that were not expressed in any tissue.
To further confirm the expression patterns of DoSnRK genes from the RNA sequencing, 10 genes and 3 tissues were selected to perform qRT-PCR assays (Figure S1). The results showed that the expression patterns from two methods exhibited similar results. All these genes could be detected in roots, stems, and leaves. For example, DoSnRK2.3 was expressed the highest in roots and the lowest in leaves. However, there was a slight difference in DoSnRK2.2 between the two analysis methods.

2.6. DoSnRK Gene Expression after Drought, MeJA, and ABA Treatments

To investigate the potential function of DoSnRKs in response to exogenous factors, three treatments were carried out on D. officinale plants, including drought, MeJA, and ABA. The expression levels of 27 DoSnRK genes were detected using qRT-PCR assays. The results are shown in Figure 6.
After drought treatment, 2 genes (DoSnRK2.7 and DoSnRK3.23) showed no change in transcripts, while the other 25 DoSnRK genes showed various changes at the transcriptional level. Among them, six DoSnRK genes showed decreased expression levels, while eight DoSnRK genes showed increased expression levels. Eight DoSnRK genes exhibited decreased or increased changes 3 h after treatment but recovered to the control level 6 h after treatment. Two DoSnRK genes (DoSnRK3.21 and DoSnRK3.24) did not show transcriptional changes until 6 h after treatment. In particular, the expression of DoSnRK3.8 gene increased at 3 h and decreased at 6 h but continued to remain higher than the control.
After MeJA treatment, 3 genes (DoSnRK3.2, DoSnRK3.5, and DoSnRK3.23) had no response at the transcriptional level, while the other 24 DoSnRK genes exhibited differential expression changes. There were 3 and 11 DoSnRK genes that showed increased and decreased transcripts, respectively. Four DoSnRK genes were responsive to treatment at 3 h but eventually returned to levels similar to the control. Three genes did not respond to the treatment until 6 h after treatment. The expression levels of DoSnRK2.6 and DoSnRK3.8 increased at 3 h but decreased at 6 h.
After ABA treatment, four DoSnRK genes kept similar transcripts as those in the control, four DoSnRK genes showed increased expression, while seven genes showed decreased expression. Moreover, the transcripts of five DoSnRK genes changed at 3 h but eventually returned to the control level. Four genes were responsive to ABA 6 h after treatment. Notably, the expression of the DoSnRK2.6 gene sharply increased at 3 h but was lower than the control at 6 h.
It was found that some genes could respond to multiple treatments. For example, the expression levels of DoSnRK1.1 were down-regulated by three treatments, and the transcripts of DoSnRK2.2 were enhanced by three treatments. These results showed their specific expression changes. To dissect the relationship between the transcriptional change and the cis-elements in the promoter region, the cis-elements in the stress-responsive DoSnRK genes were investigated. It was found that 10 members of 25 drought-responsive DoSnRK genes contained the MBS-binding site that is responsive to drought, while 16 members of 24 drought-responsive DoSnRK genes contained the CGTCA-motif that is responsible for the response to MeJA, and 15 members of 23 ABA-responsive DoSnRK genes included the ABRE motif that can respond to ABA. These results suggest that these cis-elements in their promoter regions of DoSnRK genes play a role in response to stress.

3. Discussion

As one type of Ser/Thr protein kinases, the SnRK family has been demonstrated to function in plant metabolism, signaling transduction, and stress response [2,7]. In the present research, SnRK members were first comprehensively identified from the genome of D. officinale, which will provide useful information to investigate their functions in the future.
A total of 36 DoSnRK members were identified in D. officinale. Compared with the number of SnRK members in other species, the number in D. officinale was similar to that in Arabidopsis and in Eucalyptus grandis [16], but D. officinale has 10 more than strawberry [12] and fewer than Brassica napus [42] and Brachypodium distachyon [41]. Among the three subfamilies, the DoSnRK1 subfamily had only one member (DoSnRK1.1), which is the same as that in strawberry [12] but less than that in other species. The DoSnRK2 subfamily contained moderate members, as in sugar beet [13], tea [44], E. grandis [16], and strawberry [12], but some species contained more than 10 members [41,42,45,46,47,48,49]. The DoSnRK3 subfamily contained the most members, similar to B. distachyon [41] and E. grandis [16], but fewer than Brassica. napus [42]. These results support the previous view that the SnRK2 and SnRK3 subfamilies evolved from the SnRK1 subfamily and increased their number during evolution [12].
The analyses of gene structures and conserved motifs showed that DoSnRKs exhibited high conservation during evolution. DoSnRK1.1 contained eight introns, fewer found than in strawberry [12], E. grandis [16], and B. distachyon [41]. The entire DoSnRK2 subfamily included eight introns, as most SnRK2 members from other species such as Arabidopsis [10] and rice [11]. The DoSnRK3 subfamily included the intron-free type and the intron-rich type, which was found in strawberry [12]. These results suggest that the SnRK2 subfamily contained the same number of introns as in the SnRK1 family, while some members from the SnRK3 subfamily lost introns during evolution.
The functions of genes could be implied based on their expression. In the study, as many as 26 members of 36 DoSnRK genes were expressed in multiple tissues. The ubiquitous expression pattern of SnRK genes has been found in other species [41]. For example, there were eight SnRK2 genes that were widely transcribed in a variety of tissues in Brachypodium distachyon [41]. The extensive expression of SnRK genes indicates that SnRKs could be necessary for plants to grow and develop different tissues (root, stem, leaf, flower, etc.). For the same subfamily gene from different species, there is a difference in their expression. For example, FvSnRK1.1 in strawberry was specifically expressed in certain tissues [12], while DoSnRK1.1 was abundantly expressed in different tissues, which could be species specific.
Previous studies have found that SnRK genes can respond to a variety of environmental stresses at the transcriptional level [40,50]. In B. distachyon, there were nine SnRK2 genes that were induced by ABA [41]. Similarly, multiple SnRK2 genes in Arabidopsis were responsive to ABA [25]. In our studies, it was found there were a total of 23 DoSnRK genes that could respond to ABA. Moreover, some SnRK genes were found to be responsive to multiple stresses as in D. officinale. These different SnRK subfamilies and different members from them showed distinct changes after different treatments. Based on expression changes under three treatments, it was found that 27 DoSnRK genes could be classified into three types. The first type had the lowest fold changes, including 19 members from all the three DoSnRK subfamilies. Most of them showed less than onefold increase or decrease after at least one treatment. The second type contained six members from the DoSnRK2 and DoSnRK3 subfamilies, and they showed medium fold changes (more than onefold but less than fivefold changes). The third type included two members (DoSnRK2.6 and DoSnRK3.16) that showed sharp fold changes after treatment. For them, as many as more than 150-fold changes were detected after MeJA and ABA treatment. In B. napus, extreme expression changes of BnSnRK2.24 after treatments including ABA were also observed [42]. Other SnRK genes from other species responding to various stresses were also reported, suggesting their similar functions in response to environmental changes. However, certain SnRK genes exhibiting distinct responses to different treatments have indicated the specificity of SnRK during evolution [41,42,48].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

Healthy and well-grown in vitro plants of D. officinale were kept by tissue culture in our lab. The basic medium was Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium [51] (Solarbio, Beijing, China) supplemented with 30 g/L sucrose, and plants were grown with 12 h light/12 h dark at 25 °C. For RNA extraction, the leaves, stems, and roots from three six-month-old plants were sampled, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and kept at −80 °C until use.

4.2. Plant Treatments

Two kinds of hormone treatments were performed on six-month-old plants. MeJA (Coolaber, Beijing, China) and ABA (Sangon, Shanghai, China) were dissolved in ethanol, and then deionized water was added to produce a 10 mM stock solution. The stock solution was diluted to a concentration of 100 µM. For each treatment, at least three plants were sprayed with MeJA or ABA for three or six hours, while the control plants were sprayed with the corresponding solution without MeJA or the ABA reagent. For drought treatment, plants were taken out of the medium and put on filter paper for three or six hours. The leaves from treatment and control plants were harvested, immediately frozen, and saved at −80 °C for RNA purification.

4.3. Identification of the SnRK Family in D. officinale

The protein sequences of D. officinale were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) [52]. The protein kinase domain (PF00069) was used to search potential DoSnRK proteins using HMMER [53]. The protein kinase domain was further confirmed using SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/, accessed on 3 October 2020) and CDD (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cdd, accessed on 3 October 2020). Redundant and incomplete sequences were removed, and the remaining sequences containing PF00069 were considered as candidate SnRK members. The molecular weight point and isoelectric point (pI) of deduced DoSnRK proteins were calculated using ProtParam [54]. The possible subcellular localization of DoSnRKs was forecasted using WOLF PSORT (https://www.genscript.com/psort.html, accessed on 3 October 2020).

4.4. Phylogenetic Relationship of DoSnRK Proteins

The protein sequences of AtSnRKs in Arabidopsis were acquired from The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR). To analyze the phylogenetic relationship between DoSnRK proteins and AtSnRK proteins, their full-length sequences were aligned using ClustalW [55], and the phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 7.0 with a neighbor-joining (NJ) method and a bootstrap of 1000 replicates [56].

4.5. Exon–Intron Structures and Conserved Motifs in DoSnRK Genes

The exon–intron structures of 36 DoSnRK genes were analyzed using the Gene Structure Display Server (GSDS) program by comparing the coding sequences (CDS) and the genomic sequences [57]. The conserved motifs in DoSnRK and AtSnRK proteins were searched using Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation (MEME) [58], and motifs were further analyzed using the InterPro database [59].

4.6. Expression Profiles of DoSnRK Genes in Eight Tissues

The expression levels of DoSnRK genes in eight D. officinale tissues were estimated according to the published RNA sequencing data [43]. The FPKM values were calculated as in our previous method in these tissues, including the column, flower bud, lip, sepal, leaf, stem, white root, and green root tip [60,61]. An expression heatmap of DoSnRK genes was produced using the R package pheatmap, v1.0.10 (https://rdrr.io/cran/pheatmap/, accessed on 13 January 2021).

4.7. qRT-PCR Assays

Total RNA from each sample was purified using the RNAprep Pure Plant Plus Kit (Cat. DP441, Tiangen, Beijing, China) as per the instructions. For cDNA synthesis, the concentration and quality of total RNA samples were tested on the machine Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Next, 200 ng of total RNA for each sample was used to prepare cDNA in the same reaction system of 20 µL using the cDNA Synthesis kit (Cat. AT341, Transgen, Beijing, China). The SuperReal PreMix Plus SYBR Green Kit (Tiangen, Beijing,China) was used to perform qRT-PCR. In brief, 1 µL of the cDNA mixture was mixed with SYBR Green mix in 20 µL of the reaction system. qRT-PCR was performed on the Applied Biosystems QuantStudio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System (ThemoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The primers for qRT-PCR assays of DoSnRK genes were designed on Primer3 (https://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/, accessed on 13 October 2020) and further aligned with the DoSnRK sequences to make specific sequences at the 3’-end. The sequences of primers used in qRT-PCR are listed in Table S2. The PCR conditions were as follows: pre-denaturation at 95 °C for 15 min and then 40 cycles at 95 °C for 10 s, at 60 °C for 20 s, and finally at 72°C for 30 s. The melt curves were carried out at 95 °C for 15 s, at 60 °C for 1 min, and at 95 °C for 15 s. The DoActin gene was used as an internal reference. The levels of gene expression were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method [62], and the values of CT represent an average of cycle times from three repeats.

4.8. Cis-Element Analysis in Promoter Regions of DoSnRK Genes

To analyze the possible cis-elements in the promoter regions of DoSnRK genes, sequences of 2 kb upstream of the translation start site were obtained from the NCBI and submitted to PlantCARE to search.

5. Conclusions

This study presents the first instance of comprehensive information about SnRK family genes in D. officinale. The phylogenetic analysis showed that 36 DoSnRKs could be grouped into three subfamilies (DoSnRK1, DoSnRK2, and DoSnRK3) with conserved domains and motifs. The expression analyses of DoSnRK genes in eight tissues showed that multiple DoSnRK genes were ubiquitously expressed. Drought, MeJA, and ABA treatments could induce transcriptional changes in most DoSnRK genes. Therefore, our results provide valuable information about DoSnRK genes for further understanding the functions of SnRKs in plants.

Supplementary Materials

Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/10/3/479/s1. Figure S1: Expression profiles of 10 DoSnRK genes in leaf, stem, and root tissues by qRT-PCR assay. The relative expression levels were obtained from the average of three repeats. The bars stand for the standard deviation. Table S1: The predicted cis-elements in the promoter regions of DoSnRK genes. Table S2: The primer sequences used in the qRT-PCR assay.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.L.; data curation, Y.W.; investigation, Y.W.; methodology, Y.W.; supervision, A.L.; writing—original draft, Y.W.; writing—review and editing, A.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present work was financed by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 31701465 and 31771839) and the Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department (grant number 2016FB060), as well as the Beijing DR PLANT Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (E0514832C1).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found in NCBI (PRJNA348403).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Halford, N.G.; Hey, S.J. Snf1-related protein kinases (SnRKs) act within an intricate network that links metabolic and stress signalling in plants. Biochem. J. 2009, 419, 247–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Kulik, A.; Wawer, I.; Krzywińska, E.; Bucholc, M.; Dobrowolska, G. SnRK2 protein kinases--key regulators of plant response to abiotic stresses. OMICS 2011, 15, 859–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Crozet, P.; Margalha, L.; Confraria, A.; Rodrigues, A.; Martinho, C.; Adamo, M.; Elias, C.A.; Baena-González, E. Mechanisms of regulation of SNF1/AMPK/SnRK1 protein kinases. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zheng, Z.; Xu, X.; Crosley, R.A.; Greenwalt, S.A.; Sun, Y.; Blakeslee, B.; Wang, L.; Ni, W.; Sopko, M.S.; Yao, C.; et al. The protein kinase SnRK2.6 mediates the regulation of sucrose metabolism and plant growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Coello, P.; Hey, S.J.; Halford, N.G. The sucrose non-fermenting-1-related (SnRK) family of protein kinases: Potential for ma-nipulation to improve stress tolerance and increase yield. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 883–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Fujii, H.; Verslues, P.E.; Zhu, J.K. Arabidopsis decuple mutant reveals the importance of SnRK2 kinases in osmotic stress re-sponses in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 1717–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Emanuelle, S.; Doblin, M.S.; Stapleton, D.I.; Bacic, A.; Gooley, P.R. Molecular Insights into the Enigmatic Metabolic Regulator, SnRK1. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lou, D.; Wang, H.; Liang, G.; Yu, D. OsSAPK2 Confers Abscisic Acid Sensitivity and Tolerance to Drought Stress in Rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Zhong, R.; Wang, Y.; Gai, R.; Xi, D.; Mao, C.; Ming, F. Rice SnRK protein kinase OsSAPK8 acts as a positive regulator in abiotic stress responses. Plant Sci. 2020, 292, 110373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hrabak, E.M.; Chan, C.W.; Gribskov, M.; Harper, J.F.; Choi, J.H.; Halford, N.; Kudla, J.; Luan, S.; Nimmo, H.G.; Sussman, M.R.; et al. The Arabidopsis CDPK-SnRK superfamily of protein kinases. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 666–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kobayashi, Y.; Yamamoto, S.; Minami, H.; Kagaya, Y.; Hattori, T. Differential activation of the rice sucrose nonferment-ing1-related protein kinase2 family by hyperosmotic stress and abscisic acid. Plant Cell. 2004, 16, 1163–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Zhang, Y.T.; Ye, Y.Y.; Jiang, L.Y.; Lin, Y.X.; Gu, X.J.; Chen, Q.; Sun, B.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, Y.; Wang, Y.; et al. Genome-Wide Characterization of Snf1-Related Protein Kinases (SnRKs) and Expression Analysis of SnRK1.1 in Strawberry. Gene 2020, 11, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, G.Q.; Liu, Z.X.; Xie, L.L.; Wang, J.L. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of the BvSnRK2 Genes Family in Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Under Salt Conditions. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wurzinger, B.; Nukarinen, E.; Nägele, T.; Weckwerth, W.; Teige, M. The SnRK1 Kinase as Central Mediator of Energy Signaling between Different Organelles. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 1085–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Purcell, P.C.; Smith, A.M.; Halford, N.G. Antisense expression of a sucrose nonfermenting-1-related protein kinase sequence in potato results in decreased expression of sucrose synthase in tubers and loss of sucrose-inducibility of sucrose synthase tran-scripts in leaves. Plant J. 1998, 14, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Wang, Y.; Yan, H.; Qiu, Z.; Hu, B.; Zeng, B.; Zhong, C.; Fan, C. Comprehensive Analysis of SnRK Gene Family and their Re-sponses to Salt Stress in Eucalyptus grandis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Filipe, O.; De Vleesschauwer, D.; Haeck, A.; Demeestere, K.; Höfte, M. The energy sensor OsSnRK1a confers broad-spectrum disease resistance in rice. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Wang, L.; Wang, H.; He, S.; Meng, F.; Zhang, C.; Fan, S.; Wu, J.; Zhang, S.; Xu, P. GmSnRK1.1, a Sucrose Non-fermenting-1(SNF1)-Related Protein Kinase, Promotes Soybean Resistance to Phytophthora sojae. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Chan, A.; Carianopol, C.; Tsai, A.Y.; Varatharajah, K.; Chiu, R.S.; Gazzarrini, S. SnRK1 phosphorylation of FUSCA3 positively regulates embryogenesis, seed yield, and plant growth at high temperature in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 4219–4231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Shin, R.; Alvarez, S.; Burch, A.Y.; Jez, J.M.; Schachtman, D.P. Phosphoproteomic identification of targets of the Arabidopsis sucrose nonfermenting-like kinase SnRK2.8 reveals a connection to metabolic processes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 6460–6465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Sun, L.; Wang, Y.P.; Chen, P.; Ren, J.; Ji, K.; Li, Q.; Li, P.; Dai, S.J.; Leng, P. Transcriptional regulation of SlPYL, SlPP2C, and SlSnRK2 gene families encoding ABA signal core components during tomato fruit development and drought stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 5659–5669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Umezawa, T.; Yoshida, R.; Maruyama, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. SRK2C, a SNF1-related protein kinase 2, improves drought tolerance by controlling stress-responsive gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 17306–17311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Dey, A.; Samanta, M.K.; Gayen, S.; Maiti, M.K. The sucrose non-fermenting 1-related kinase 2 gene SAPK9 improves drought tolerance and grain yield in rice by modulating cellular osmotic potential, stomatal closure and stress-responsive gene expres-sion. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Kobayashi, Y.; Murata, M.; Minami, H.; Yamamoto, S.; Kagaya, Y.; Hobo, T.; Yamamoto, A.; Hattori, T. Abscisic acid-activated SNRK2 protein kinases function in the gene-regulation pathway of ABA signal transduction by phosphorylating ABA response element-binding factors. Plant J. 2005, 44, 939–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Nakashima, K.; Fujita, Y.; Kanamori, N.; Katagiri, T.; Umezawa, T.; Kidokoro, S.; Maruyama, K.; Yoshida, T.; Ishiyama, K.; Kobayashi, M.; et al. Three Arabidopsis SnRK2 protein kinases, SRK2D/SnRK2.2, SRK2E/SnRK2.6/OST1 and SRK2I/SnRK2.3, involved in ABA signaling are essential for the control of seed development and dormancy. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 1345–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Mao, X.; Zhang, H.; Tian, S.; Chang, X.; Jing, R. TaSnRK2.4, an SNF1-type serine/threonine protein kinase of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), confers enhanced multistress tolerance in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 683–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zhang, H.; Mao, X.; Jing, R.; Chang, X.; Xie, H. Characterization of a common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) TaSnRK2.7 gene involved in abiotic stress responses. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 975–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Tian, S.; Mao, X.; Zhang, H.; Chen, S.; Zha, C.; Yang, S.; Jing, R. Cloning and characterization of TaSnRK2.3, a novel SnRK2 gene in common wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 2063–2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Song, X.; Yu, X.; Hori, C.; Demura, T.; Ohtani, M.; Zhuge, Q. Heterologous overexpression of poplar SnRK2 genes enhanced salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Phan, T.T.; Sun, B.; Niu, J.Q.; Tan, Q.L.; Li, J.; Yang, L.T.; Li, Y.R. Overexpression of sugarcane gene SoSnRK2.1 confers drought tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Rep. 2016, 35, 1891–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lou, D.; Wang, H.; Yu, D. The sucrose non-fermenting-1-related protein kinases SAPK1 and SAPK2 function collaboratively as positive regulators of salt stress tolerance in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Szymanska, K.P.; Polkowska-Kowalczyk, L.; Lichocka, M.; Maszkowska, J.; Dobrowolska, G. SNF1-Related Protein Kinases SnRK2.4 and SnRK2.10 Modulate ROS Homeostasis in Plant Response to Salt Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Feng, J.; Wang, L.; Wu, Y.; Luo, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Qiu, D.; Han, J.; Su, P.; Xiong, Z.; Chang, J.; et al. TaSnRK2.9, a Sucrose Non-fermenting 1-Related Protein Kinase Gene, Positively Regulates Plant Response to Drought and Salt Stress in Transgenic Tobacco. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 9, 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Xiang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Xiong, L. Characterization of stress-responsive CIPK genes in rice for stress tolerance improvement. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 1416–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Fujii, H.; Zhu, J.K. An autophosphorylation site of the protein kinase SOS2 is important for salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2009, 2, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Ng, T.B.; Liu, J.; Wong, J.H.; Ye, X.; Sze, S.C.W.; Tong, Y.; Zhang, K.Y. Review of research on Dendrobium, a prized folk medicine. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 93, 1795–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yan, L.; Wang, X.; Liu, H.; Tian, Y.; Lian, J.; Yang, R.; Hao, S.; Wang, X.; Yang, S.; Li, Q.; et al. The Genome of Dendrobium officinale Illuminates the Biology of the Important Traditional Chinese Orchid Herb. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 922–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Tang, H.; Zhao, T.; Sheng, Y.; Zheng, T.; Fu, L.; Zhang, Y. Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo: A Review on Its Eth-nopharmacology, Phytochemistry, Pharmacology, and Industrialization. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2017, 2017, 7436259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Saha, J.; Chatterjee, C.; Sengupta, A.; Gupta, K.; Gupta, B. Genome-wide analysis and evolutionary study of sucrose non-fermenting 1-related protein kinase 2 (SnRK2) gene family members in Arabidopsis and Oryza. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2014, 49, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Shao, Y.; Qin, Y.; Zou, Y.; Ma, F. Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of the SnRK2 gene family in Malus prunifolia. Gene 2014, 552, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, L.; Hu, W.; Sun, J.; Liang, X.; Yang, X.; Wei, S.; Wang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Xiao, Q.; Yang, G.; et al. Genome-wide analysis of SnRK gene family in Brachypodium distachyon and functional characterization of BdSnRK2.9. Plant Sci. 2015, 237, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhu, W.; Wu, D.; Jiang, L.; Ye, L. Genome-wide identification and characterization of SnRK family genes in Brassica napus. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, G.Q.; Liu, K.W.; Li, Z.; Lohaus, R.; Hsiao, Y.Y.; Niu, S.C.; Wang, J.Y.; Lin, Y.C.; Xu, Q.; Chen, L.J.; et al. The Apostasia genome and the evolution of orchids. Nature 2017, 549, 379–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Zhang, Y.H.; Wan, S.Q.; Wang, W.D.; Chen, J.F.; Huang, L.L.; Duan, M.S.; Yu, Y.B. Genome-wide identification and charac-terization of the CsSnRK2 family in Camellia sinensis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 132, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Li, C.; Nong, Q.; Xie, J.; Wang, Z.; Liang, Q.; Solanki, M.K.; Malviya, M.K.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Htun, R.; et al. Molecular Charac-terization and Co-expression Analysis of the SnRK2 Gene Family in Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 17659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Huai, J.; Wang, M.; He, J.; Zheng, J.; Dong, Z.; Lv, H.; Zhao, J.; Wang, G. Cloning and characterization of the SnRK2 gene family from Zea mays. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27, 1861–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yoo, M.J.; Ma, T.; Zhu, N.; Liu, L.; Harmon, A.C.; Wang, Q.; Chen, S. Genome-wide identification and homeolog-specific expression analysis of the SnRK2 genes in Brassica napus guard cells. Plant Mol. Biol. 2016, 91, 211–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, Z.; Ge, X.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, G.; Chen, E.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, F. Genome-wide identification and characterization of SnRK2 gene family in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). BMC Genet. 2017, 18, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhao, W.; Cheng, Y.H.; Zhang, C.; Shen, X.J.; You, Q.B.; Guo, W.; Li, X.; Song, X.J.; Zhou, X.A.; Jiao, Y.Q. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of the GmSnRK2 Family in Soybean. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Shen, X.; Guo, X.; Zhao, D.; Zhang, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Peng, X.; Wei, Y.; Zhai, Z.; Zhao, W.; et al. Cloning and expression profiling of the PacSnRK2 and PacPP2C gene families during fruit development, ABA treatment, and dehydration stress in sweet cherry. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 119, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant 1962, 15, 437–497. [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhang, G.Q.; Xu, Q.; Bian, C.; Tsai, W.C.; Yeh, C.M.; Liu, K.W.; Yoshida, K.; Zhang, L.S.; Chang, S.B.; Chen, F.; et al. The Dendrobium catenatum Lindl. genome sequence provides insights into polysaccharide synthase, floral development and adaptive evolution. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Finn, R.D.; Clements, J.; Arndt, W.; Miller, B.L.; Wheeler, T.J.; Schreiber, F.; Bateman, A.; Eddy, S.R. HMMER web server: 2015 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, W30–W38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wilkins, M.R.; Gasteiger, E.; Bairoch, A.; Sanchez, J.C.; Williams, K.L.; Appel, R.D.; Hochstrasser, D.F. Protein identification and analysis tools in the ExPASy server. Methods Mol. Biol. 1999, 112, 531–552. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. McWilliam, H.; Li, W.; Uludag, M.; Squizzato, S.; Park, Y.M.; Buso, N.; Cowley, A.P.; Lopez, R. Analysis Tool Web Services from the EMBL-EBI. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, W597–W600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Hu, B.; Jin, J.; Guo, A.Y.; Zhang, H.; Luo, J.; Gao, G. GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1296–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Bailey, T.L.; Boden, M.; Buske, F.A.; Frith, M.; Grant, C.E.; Clementi, L.; Ren, J.; Li, W.W.; Noble, W.S. MEME SUITE: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, W202–W208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Apweiler, R.; Attwood, T.K.; Bairoch, A.; Bateman, A.; Birney, E.; Biswas, M.; Bucher, P.; Cerutti, L.; Corpet, F.; Croning, M.D.; et al. The InterPro database, an integrated documentation resource for protein families, domains and functional sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Pertea, M.; Kim, D.; Pertea, G.M.; Leek, J.T.; Salzberg, S.L. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat. Protoc. 2016, 11, 1650–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Wang, Y.; Liu, A. Genomic Characterization and Expression Analysis of Basic Helix-Loop-Helix (bHLH) Family Genes in Traditional Chinese Herb Dendrobium officinale. Plants 2020, 8, 1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Plants 10 00479 g001 550
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of sucrose non-fermenting1-related protein kinase (SnRK) proteins from D. officinale and Arabidopsis.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of sucrose non-fermenting1-related protein kinase (SnRK) proteins from D. officinale and Arabidopsis.
Plants 10 00479 g001
Plants 10 00479 g002 550
Figure 2. Gene structures of DoSnRK genes in D. officinale.
Figure 2. Gene structures of DoSnRK genes in D. officinale.
Plants 10 00479 g002
Plants 10 00479 g003 550
Figure 3. The multiple sequence alignment of DoSnRK2 and DoSnRK3 proteins.
Figure 3. The multiple sequence alignment of DoSnRK2 and DoSnRK3 proteins.
Plants 10 00479 g003
Plants 10 00479 g004 550
Figure 4. The conserved motifs of SnRK proteins predicted using Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation (MEME). The colored rectangles with numbers stand for 10 conserved motifs/ and the gray lines are non-conserved sequences.
Figure 4. The conserved motifs of SnRK proteins predicted using Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation (MEME). The colored rectangles with numbers stand for 10 conserved motifs/ and the gray lines are non-conserved sequences.
Plants 10 00479 g004
Plants 10 00479 g005 550
Figure 5. Expression patterns of 36 DoSnRK genes in eight tissues of D. officinale. The expression levels were based on the RNA sequencing data [43]. The eight tissues tested included the column, flower bud, lip, sepal, leaf, stem, white root, and green root tip. The color scale stands for the values of log2(FPKM + 0.001).
Figure 5. Expression patterns of 36 DoSnRK genes in eight tissues of D. officinale. The expression levels were based on the RNA sequencing data [43]. The eight tissues tested included the column, flower bud, lip, sepal, leaf, stem, white root, and green root tip. The color scale stands for the values of log2(FPKM + 0.001).
Plants 10 00479 g005
Plants 10 00479 g006 550
Figure 6. Expression levels of 27 DoSnRK genes under three treatments using qRT-PCR assays. The mock-treated leaves at the beginning (0 h) were used as the control to calculate the relative expression levels at 3 and 6 h after treatment. Each experiment was performed with at least three individual plants with three replications. The bars denote the standard deviation.
Figure 6. Expression levels of 27 DoSnRK genes under three treatments using qRT-PCR assays. The mock-treated leaves at the beginning (0 h) were used as the control to calculate the relative expression levels at 3 and 6 h after treatment. Each experiment was performed with at least three individual plants with three replications. The bars denote the standard deviation.
Plants 10 00479 g006
Table
Table 1. The list of 36 DoSnRK genes identified in Dendrobium officinale.
Table 1. The list of 36 DoSnRK genes identified in Dendrobium officinale.
Gene NameGene IDScaffoldLength of Coding Sequences (CDS)
(bp)		Protein
Length
(aa)		 Mol. Wt. (kDa)pILocation
DoSnRK1.1LOC1100939057371530509 58.018.77a,b
DoSnRK2.1LOC1101048072311086361 41.65.81a,b
DoSnRK2.2LOC11010747011051080359 41.395.58a,b
DoSnRK2.3LOC1100944032096361164387 44.665.17b,a
DoSnRK2.4LOC1101021482111026341 39.045.62a,b
DoSnRK2.5LOC1100926715261005334 37.875.69a,b
DoSnRK2.6LOC1101125774591092363 41.174.90a,c
DoSnRK2.7LOC1101163246011086361 40.924.77c,a
DoSnRK3.1LOC1101161074561350449 50.979.25b,c,a
DoSnRK3.2LOC1100990743131347448 50.979.07b,c,a
DoSnRK3.3LOC11011251812171389462 52.439.08c,a
DoSnRK3.4LOC110112938613221305434 49.769.18a,c,b
DoSnRK3.5LOC11010063410561323440 50.239.16b,a,c
DoSnRK3.6LOC1101048082311263420 46.879.37c,a
DoSnRK3.7LOC1101136866241341446 49.929.37b,c,a
DoSnRK3.8LOC1100944396291281426 47.159.04a,b
DoSnRK3.9LOC11009340710381311436 48.199.10d,c,b
DoSnRK3.10LOC1100952657681416471 53.468.79d
DoSnRK3.11LOC1101138653701422473 53.57.99d
DoSnRK3.12LOC1101090951174101461486 54.748.01b,a
DoSnRK3.13LOC11009340810381344447 49.788.59d,c,b
DoSnRK3.14LOC1100954998271290429 48.29.32b,a
DoSnRK3.15LOC1101026871231350449 50.58.28b,a,c
DoSnRK3.16LOC1100980843131419472 52.829.30a,b,c
DoSnRK3.17LOC11010063310561467488 54.699.10a,b,c
DoSnRK3.18LOC110112951613221371456 50.948.80a,b,c
DoSnRK3.19LOC1101057142601353450 51.068.37a,b
DoSnRK3.20LOC1100982082311254417 47.595.91a,c
DoSnRK3.21LOC11011355915571350449 51.098.01a
DoSnRK3.22LOC11011005912201299432 48.828.94b,c,a
DoSnRK3.23LOC1101018789741509502 57.149.24b,c,a
DoSnRK3.24LOC1101037567161293430 48.828.87a,b,c
DoSnRK3.25LOC11011352617211356451 51.478.70b,a,c
DoSnRK3.26LOC11011448216081305434 49.368.32b,c,a
DoSnRK3.27LOC1101126806271407468 52.977.51b,c,a
DoSnRK3.28LOC1101076801421299432 48.788.01b,a,c
a, Cytoplasmic; b, nuclear; c, mitochondrial; d, endoplasmic reticulum.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Liu, A. Genomic Characterization and Expression Analysis of the SnRK Family Genes in Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo (Orchidaceae). Plants 2021, 10, 479. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10030479

AMA Style

Wang Y, Liu A. Genomic Characterization and Expression Analysis of the SnRK Family Genes in Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo (Orchidaceae). Plants. 2021; 10(3):479. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10030479

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yue, and Aizhong Liu. 2021. "Genomic Characterization and Expression Analysis of the SnRK Family Genes in Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo (Orchidaceae)" Plants 10, no. 3: 479. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10030479

APA Style

Wang, Y., & Liu, A. (2021). Genomic Characterization and Expression Analysis of the SnRK Family Genes in Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo (Orchidaceae). Plants, 10(3), 479. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10030479

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop