Next Article in Journal
Identification of microRNAs That Provide a Low Light Stress Tolerance-Mediated Signaling Pathway during Vegetative Growth in Rice
Next Article in Special Issue
6-Paradol Alleviates Testosterone-Induced Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Rats by Inhibiting AKT/mTOR Axis
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolomic Profiling in Combination with Data Association Analysis Provide Insights about Potential Metabolic Regulation Networks among Non-Volatile and Volatile Metabolites in Camellia sinensis cv Baijiguan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Alpha-Mangostin as a New Therapeutic Candidate for Concanavalin A-Induced Autoimmune Hepatitis: Impact on the SIRT1/Nrf2 and NF-κB Crosstalk
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phenolic Acids and Flavonoids from Pithecellobium dulce (Robx.) Benth Leaves Exhibit Ovicidal Activity against Haemonchus contortus

by
Agustín Olmedo-Juárez
1,
Ana Laura Jimenez-Chino
2,
Alejandro Bugarin
3,*,
Alejandro Zamilpa
4,
Pedro Mendoza-de Gives
1,
Abel Villa-Mancera
5,
María Eugenia López-Arellano
1,
Jaime Olivares-Pérez
6,
Edgar Jesús Delgado-Núñez
7 and
Manases González-Cortazar
4,*
1
National Centre for Disciplinary Research in Animal Health and Innocuity (CENID-SAI), National Institute for Research in Forestry, Agriculture and Livestock, INIFAP, Carr. Fed. Cuernavaca-Cuautla No. 8534, Jiutepec CP 62550, Morelos, Mexico
2
Biotechnology Engineering, Polytechnic University of the State of Morelos, Boulevard Cuauhnáhuac #566, Col. Lomas del Texcal, Jiutepec CP 62550, Morelos, Mexico
3
Department of Chemistry and Physics, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL 33965, USA
4
South Biomedical Research Center, Social Security Mexican Institute (CIBIS-IMSS), Argentina No. 1, Xochitepec CP 62790, Morelos, Mexico
5
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, Meritorious Autonomous University of Puebla, 4 Sur 304 Col. Centro, Tecamachalco CP 75482, Puebla, Mexico
6
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, Autonomous University of Guerrero, Altamirano, Km 3.0 Altamirano-Iguala Highway, Colonia Querendita, Altamirano CP 40660, Guerrero, Mexico
7
Faculty of Agricultural, Livestock and Environmental Sciences, Autonomous University of Guerrero, Iguala CP 40040, Guerrero, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(19), 2555; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11192555
Submission received: 26 August 2022 / Revised: 19 September 2022 / Accepted: 23 September 2022 / Published: 28 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biological and Chemical Activity of Metabolites of Medicinal Plants)

Abstract

:
Pithecellobium dulce (Robx.) Benth is an arboreal legume used in traditional medicine for the treatment of several ailments, including a number of intestinal disorders, and as a natural deworming. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ovicidal activity of a hydroalcoholic extract (HA-E) and its fractions (aqueous, Aq-F and organic, EtOAc-F) from P. dulce leaves, as well as subfractions (C1F1–C17) obtained from EtOAc-F against Haemonchus contortus eggs. The HA-E, Aq-F, and EtOAc-F were assessed at 0.03–5.00 mg/mL and subfractions (C1F1–C17) were assessed at 0.06–1.00 mg/mL. The HA-E and Aq-F showed an ovicidal activity close to 100% at 2.5 mg/mL, and EtOAc-F displayed the highest anthelmintic effect (100% at 0.25 mg/mL). Meanwhile, the sub-fractions with the highest ovicidal effect were C1F6, C1F9, C1F10, C1F11, and CIF13. The main compounds identified in the most active fractions (C1F9, C1F11, and C1F13) were kaempferol (1), quercetin (2), coumaric acid (3), ferulic acid (4), luteolin 7-O-rhamnoside (5), quercetin 3-O-rhamnoside (6), and a caffeoyl derivate (NI). The results indicate that P. dulce leaves exhibit a potent anthelmintic activity and contain bioactive compounds able to inhibit egg hatching in H. contortus. Therefore, this plant could be used for the control of gastrointestinal nematodes in small ruminants.

1. Introduction

Small ruminants feeding under grazing conditions are exposed to several diseases caused by different pathogenic agents, i.e., viruses, bacteria, and parasites that affect the livestock industry [1]. Gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) are important parasites with high prevalence in grazing animals in primarily tropical and subtropical regions. Haemonchus contortus is one of the most prominent pathogenic parasitic nematodes affecting sheep and goats. Due to its hematophagous habits, H. contortus can cause severe damage to the animals, thus affecting their zootechnical potential [2]. In livestock, infections with H. contortus are difficult to control, resulting in high economic losses worldwide (Corwin, 1997; Rodríguez-Vivas et al., 2017) [3,4]. In addition, the frequent and continuous use of chemical anthelmintic drugs has led to anthelmintic resistance worldwide. Recently, there has been a growing number of reports of resistance to commercially available antiparasitic drugs [5,6]. In this context, both the search for alternatives to control GIN and studies about plants/plant extracts rich in secondary metabolites with potential anthelmintic effect have shown encouraging results [7]. Some plants of the family Fabaceae have been assessed against GIN, including H. contortus, with promising results [8,9,10]. In Mexico, some arboreal legumes, such as Lysiloma acapulcensis, L. latisilicum, Leucaena leucocephala, Caesalpinia coriaria, Acacia cochliacantha, A. farnesiana, and Prosopis laevigata, are being explored for their potential anthelmintic activity, also with promising results. These plants contain phenolic compounds with nematocidal activity, such as condensed tannins, myricitrin, gallic acid, coumaric acid, isorhamnetin, caffeoyl and coumaroyl derivatives, and galloyl flavonoids [8,11,12,13,14]. Pithecellobium dulce (Robx.) Benth is an arboreal legume commonly named in Mexico as “guamuchil” or “pinzan” that is used in traditional medicine as a remedy against indigestion, to treat bilious disorders, and as an anthelmintic (e.g., to cure malaria) [15]. There are reports of its antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anthelmintic activities [16,17,18]. Aqueous and methanolic extracts of P. dulce leaves have been reported to have anthelmintic effect against GIN in small ruminants [19,20]. Thus, this study assessed the ovicidal activity of a hydroalcoholic extract (HA-E), two fractions (an aqueous fraction, Aq-F, and an organic fraction, EtOAc-F), and sub-fractions from P. dulce leaves against H. contortus eggs under in vitro conditions.

2. Results

2.1. Egg Hatching Inhibition (EHI) Test

The ovicidal activity of the HA extract and the Aq and EtOAc fractions, as well as their proper controls, are shown in Table 1. The egg hatching inhibition percentage of the HA-E and the Aq fraction were greater than 90% from 0.62 mg/mL concentration. The organic fraction (EtOAc-F) exhibited the best ovicidal effect (100%) at 0.25 mg/mL. The negative controls showed no egg hatching inhibitory effect, and thiabendazole displayed a total ovicidal activity.
Table 2 shows the effective concentrations (50 and 90) required to cause an ovicidal effect of the HA extract and both Aq and EtOAc fractions. The latter fraction had the best anthelmintic effect, with EC50 and EC90 values of 0.08 and 0.14 mg/mL, respectively.
The EHI percentages of subfractions C1F6-C1F13 are shown in Table 3. The highest ovicidal effect was observed in the subfractions C1F9, C1F10, C1F11, and C1F13, with 100% of EHI at 1 mg/mL.
Table 4 shows the effective concentrations (50 and 90) of subfractions with a concentration-dependent effect. The C1F9 and C1F11 fractions were the most active ones, with EC50 = 0.03 and 0.04 mg/mL, a EC90 = 0.06 and 0.07 mg/mL, respectively.

2.2. Identification of Compounds

The HPLC chromatograms of the HA-extract as well as the Aq and EtOAc fractions are shown in Figure 1. The major compounds identified were coumaric acid with a retention time (rt) of 10.01 min and a UV absorption spectrum at λmax of 227.4 and 310.0 nm; and luteolin 7-O-rhamnoside (5) with a rt = 11.07 min and a UV absorption spectrum of 209, 263.9, and 343.4 nm. The percentages of the area under the curve of coumaric acid and luteolin 7-O-rhamnoside in the hydroalcoholic extract were 23.56 and 76.44%, respectively. In the aqueous fraction they were 38.25 and 61.75%, while for the ethyl acetate fraction were 19.77 and 80.23%, respectively.
Figure 2 shows the chemical constituents present in the bioactive subfractions. The major compounds identified in C1F9 were kaempferol (1) with a retention time (rt) of 21.8 min (75.87%) and a UV absorption spectrum at λmax of 209.9, 265, and 363 nm; a compound derived from caffeic acid (unidentified) of 12.5 min (2.29%) and a UV absorption spectrum at λmax of 219.2, 242.7, and 325.5 nm; and coumaric acid (3, rt= 10.01, 21.84%). The C1F10 subfraction showed the presence of (1, rt = 21.94, 25.96%), ferulic acid (4, rt = 10.4 min, 4.39%) and UV absorption spectrum λmax of 218.1, 234.5, and 320.8 nm and (3, rt = 10.01 min, 69.65%). In subfraction C1F11, the presence of kaempferol (1, rt = 21.94, 8.47%), quercetin (2, rt = 14.96 min, 8.79%), (4, rt = 10.4 min, 19.75%), and (3, rt = 10.1 min, 62.99%) were observed. The subfraction C1F13 contained luteolin 7-O-rhamnoside (5, rt = 11.1 min, 90.02%) and coumaric acid (3, rt = 10.1 min, 9.98%), while subfraction C1F15 contained luteolin 7-O-rhamnoside (5, rt = 11.1 min, 93.05%) and quercetin 3-O-rhamnoside (6, rt = 10.03 min, 6.95%). Fingerprint comparison of the bioactive fractions with commercial references (kaempferol, quercetin, coumaric acid, ferulic acid, and quercetin 3-O-rhamnoside) allowed identification of these polyphenols (Figures S6–S10).
Compound (1): analysis of the acquired NMR spectra [1H, 13C, and DEPT (Figures S1–S3)] and its comparison to data reported in the literature [21], this compound is a flavonoid known as Kaempferol (1). Compound 1 displayed a quasimolecular positive ion at m/z 287 [M + H]+ in ESI-MS (Figure S4), with molecular formula C15H10O6.
Compound (5): this compound exhibited a quasimolecular negative ion at m/z 432 [M] in EI-MS (see Figure S5), with the molecular formula C21H20O10. According to electrospray ionization mass spectrum (ESI-MS) analysis, this compound corresponds to a glycosylated flavonoid called luteolin 7-O-rhamnoside.
The chemical structures of the isolated compounds are shown in Figure 3.

3. Discussion

The nematode H. contortus is one of the most pathogenic agents that severely affects the health and production of small ruminant herds. In this scenery, farmers deworm their animals with anthelmintic drugs in a constant and indiscriminate manner, leading to the imminent presence of anthelmintic resistance by the parasites [22]. The use of medicinal plants represents a viable way to discover new molecules for controlling GIN in ruminant herds. The results found in the present study revealed that P. dulce leaves exhibited the highest ovicidal effect against the parasite H. contortus. The HA extract displayed a concentration-dependent effect, with an ovicidal effect close to 100% at 0.62 mg/mL. This finding demonstrates that the anthelmintic potential of this legume and the ovicidal effect of the HA extract were higher than those of other plants belonging to the same family. For instance, Zarza-Albarrán et al. have shown an ovicidal effect close to 100% for a hydroalcoholic extract from Acacia farnesiana pods against H. contortus, using a concentration of 25 mg/mL [14]. In another study, a HA extract obtained from Caesalpinia coriaria fruits was tested against a miscellanea of cattle gastrointestinal nematodes achieved 97% of EHI at 1.56 mg/mL [23]. In the present study, the effective concentration of the HA-E (EC50 = 0.18 mg/mL) was 72.05 times more active than the one shown by A. farnesiana (EC50 = 12.97 mg/mL) pods HA-E and 5.11 times more effective than C. coriaria HA-E fruits (EC50 = 5.11 mg/mL).
After the corroboration of the ovicidal activity of the P. dulce full extract and the organic and the aqueous fractions by bipartition were obtained, a high nematocidal effect was observed for EtOAc-F. After analysis, the EC50 of the EtOAc fraction and comparing it with the HA-E and the aqueous fraction (Aq-F), it was noted that the organic fraction was 12.15 times more active than the other fractions (HA-E and Aq-F). The same analysis was performed with the EC90, showing that the EtOAc-F was 23.85 times more active than the HA extract and the Aq fraction. Similar results have been reported for other arboreal legumes such as Lysiloma acapulcensis and A. cochliacantha, whose organic fractions (EtOAc-F) were assessed against H. contortus eggs, resulting in 94.85% activity at 6.2 mg/mL and 98% at 1.56 mg/mL [12,13]. The liquid-liquid extraction of the HA extract with ethyl acetate, performed in this study and in other studies with legumes, provides the basis for the determination of the biological activity of hydroalcoholic extracts of plant materials from several arboreal legumes. Thus, the constituents present in the EtOAc fraction from P. dulce leaves and their ovicidal activity corroborated this asseveration.
The chromatographic process of EtOAc-F fractionation permitted the isolation of eight bioactive subfractions with an important ovicidal effect. This finding could be explained by the presence of known compounds associated with nematocidal activity, such as kaempferol, ferulic acid, coumaric acid, kaempferol rhamnoside, and quercetin. Similarly, Castillo-Mitre et al. tested a mixture of p-coumaric acid and ferulic acid obtained from Acacia cochliacantha leaves against H. contortus eggs, and demonstrated an ovicidal activity close to 100% at 1 mg/mL [12]. These compounds are present in the C1F11 (Figure 2), and this fraction exhibited a total ovicidal activity at 1 mg/mL (Table 3).
Plants belonging to the Fabaceae family are rich in secondary metabolites such as tannins, flavonoids, and other phenolic compounds [24]. Several studies with arboreal legumes and their secondary compounds have demonstrated an important nematocidal activity against gastrointestinal parasitic nematodes of cattle and small ruminants. This represents a potential strategy for controlling parasitosis, providing a different perspective to the use of anthelmintic drugs chemically synthesised in a laboratory. Several studies have demonstrated that some phenolic compounds play an important role against different stages of GIN. The phenolic compounds produced by other arboreal legumes, such as coumaroyl and caffeic derivatives, caffeic acid, gallic acid, isokaempferide, 4-5-di-O-caffeoylquinic, and naringenin 7-O-(6-galloylglucoside), have contributed to the finding of novel drugs obtained from natural sources, facilitating the development of new anthelmintics for controlling GIN of importance in the livestock industry [14,25].
The arboreal legume P. dulce has been used in traditional medicine to treat gastrointestinal disorders and malaria [15,26,27]. In a study carried out by Olmedo-Juárez et al., a crude extract complex with fresh leaves from P. dulce was assessed against a GIN strain, and the authors achieved an ovicidal effect close to 40% at 0.5 mg/mL [19].
The clear evidence of nematocidal activity found in the present study with P. dulce leaves allowed the identification of several bioactive compounds, such as ferulic acid, coumaric acid, kaempferol rhamnoside, and quercetin (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
Analysing the HPLC sub-fractions showed that the major compounds in one more of the active treatments (C1F11) correspond to ferulic and coumaric acids; meanwhile, quercetin and kaempferol were the compounds found in minor proportions (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The mixture of these compounds could exert a synergic ovicidal effect. On the other hand, analysing the compounds present in the C1F9 subfraction led to the inference that kaempferol was the major constituent and ferulic acid the minor. However, when kaempferol was tested individually, it showed no ovicidal activity against H. contortus eggs (Table 2). Nevertheless, the mixture of ferulic acid and kaempferol, as present in C1F9, displayed the highest anthelmintic effect (Table 3).
Several studies with pure molecules, obtained commercially or directly obtained from plants, indicate two anthelmintic effects (synergism or additive). For instance, Mancilla-Montelongo et al. assessed seven hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives, either individually or combined, against H. contortus eggs and infective larvae [28]. The authors found that ferulic and chlorogenic acids blocked egg hatching at 0.24 and 0.52 mg/mL, respectively. In the same study, when testing ferulic acid and coumaric acid individually, the authors only found ovicidal activity for ferulic acid. Likewise, these authors performed a combination of ferulic, chlorogenic, cinnamic, coumaric, and caffeic acids and reported a high anthelmintic effect (EC50 = 0.923 mg/mL). In another study, phenolic compounds quercetin, rutin, coumarin, and caffeic acid were assayed against eggs of the cattle nematode Cooperia punctata [27]. A synergic effect was observed with the combination of caffeic acid with coumaric acid, quercetin, and rutin [29]. These studies, combined with the findings of the present work, support the hypothesis that the anthelmintic effect is attributed to the hydrocinnamic acid derivatives. Nonetheless, future studies should be performed using the bioactive subfractions from P. dulce leaves to determine the amounts of ferulic and coumaric acids and kaempferol, along with their relations to the ovicidal activity on H. contortus eggs.
According to reports related to anthelmintic activities of several phenolic compounds through in vitro and in vivo studies, and considering the results found herein, the importance of medicinal plants as potential natural anthelmintics is evident. It should be note that the use of extracts or fractions depends on multiple factors such as environmental conditions, phenological stage and plant age, among others. Likewise, the extraction method of the secondary metabolites is associated with the affinity of the solvent used. Thus, the standardisation of these extracts or fractions, according to the contents of bioactive compounds, is necessary to obtain reliable results for controlling H. contortus and other GIN affecting herds worldwide. The in vitro efficacy of the above-mentioned molecules should be tested under in vivo conditions in animal farms to corroborate their anthelmintic effects, thereby improving animal health and increasing farm productivity.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. General

The chemical compounds used in this study were analytical grade. The solvents (ethanol, methanol, ethyl acetate and distilled water), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), p-coumaric acid (≥98%), ferulic acid (≥99%), quercetin (≥95%), and thiabendazole (≥98.0%) were purchased from Merck KGaA® (Darmstadt, Germany) and Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Reagents for the bioassays (ovicidal activity) were purchased from Corning® (Corning, NY, USA). HPLC analyses were performed on a Waters 2695 Separation module system, equipped with a Waters 996 photodiode array detector and the Empower Pro software (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). Mass spectroscopy was performed on a Waters Xevo TQD mass spectrometer with an ESI ion source (Waters Milford, Milford, MA, USA). The ultraviolet (UV) spectra were obtained using a Waters array detector (Waters Co. 2996, Milford, MA, USA). Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed using TLC Silica gel 60, F254 and 20 × 20-cm aluminium sheets (Merck KGaA®, Darmstadt, Germany).

4.2. Plant Material

Pithecellobium dulce leaves were collected from the San Gaspar municipality, Jiutepec, Morelos, Mexico (18°52′53′′ N and 99°10′40′′ W). Fresh leaves (young and mature) were collected between September and October 2018. One specimen was deposited in the herbarium of the Centre for Research in Biodiversity and Conservation at Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Mexico, under voucher code 33948. The name of this plant has been checked in the data bases of the plant list [30]. The plant material was dried at room temperature in the dark for 3 weeks, and subsequently, the leaves were ground using an electrical mill (Wiley mill, TS3375E15) to reduce the size particle to 4–6 mm.

4.3. Hydroalcoholic Extract

Dried leaves (300 g) were subjected to liquid extraction using distilled water (2100 mL) and methanol (900 mL) at room temperature for 24 h, and the liquid extract was filtered using different sieves (gauze, cotton, and Whatman®4 filter paper). The hydroalcoholic extract (HA-E) was concentrated under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator (55 °C, Büchi R-300, Flawil, Switzerland) to obtain a semisolid extract, which was finally freeze-dried, resulting in a brown powder (54 g, 18%).

4.4. Fractionation of the Hydroalcoholic Extract (HA-E)

The HA-E (50 g) was suspended in distilled water (2500 mL) and EtOAc (2500 mL) in a separatory funnel, resulting in two fractions: an aqueous (Aq-F) and an organic fraction (EtOAct-F). The solvents of both fractions were removed using a rotary evaporator and finally dried via lyophilisation, producing residues of 6.18 and 3.1 g, respectively. The HA-E and fractions were stored at −40 °C until pharmacological and phytochemical analysis could be performed [25].

4.5. Fractionation of the Organic Fraction (EtOAc-F) and Identification of Compounds (16)

The organic fraction (9.5 g) was adsorbed in silica gel (10 g normal phase), applied to a glass column with silica gel (5.0 × 40 cm, 30 g, 0.04–0.06-mm mesh, Merck, Darmstadt Germany), and eluded with hexane/ethyl acetate with 5% ascendant polarity, collecting 71 subfractions of 50 mL each. Subsequently, the subfractions were concentrated in a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure and grouped according to their similarity by TLC into 17 subfractions (C1F1-C1F17). The C1F9 fraction (834 g) was absorbed with silica gel (RP-18, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and fractionated on a glass column (350 × 20 mm) packed with silica gel (10 g, RP-18, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The elution system was water; acetonitrile, using four mixtures: 70:30; 65:35, 40:60; and methanol (100%), and obtained 16 sub-fractions of volumes of 10 mL. In fraction 3 and 4, compound (1) was isolated and identified by NMR and MS (see supplementary data Figures S1–S4). Compounds (24) and (6) were identified by comparison of HPLC data with standards and luteolin 7-O-rhamnoside (5) was identified by mass spectrometry (supplementary data, Figure S5). The HA extract, fractions and subfractions were analysed by TLC on silica gel 60 under light at 254 and 360 nm (supplementary data, Figures S11–S17). All structures identified in the bioactive sub-fractions are shown in Figure 3.

4.6. HPLC-PDA and MS

The HA extract, fractions, and subfractions were subjected to chemical analysis using a Supelcosil LC-F column (4.6 × 50 mm i.d., 5-μm particle size) for chemical separation (Sigma-Aldrich, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The mobile phase consisted of 0.5% trifluoroacetic acid aqueous solution (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B). The gradient system used was as follows: 0–1 min, 0% B; 2–3 min, 5% B; 4–20 min, 30% B; 21–23 min, 50% B; 24–25 min, 80% B; 26–27 min 100% B; 28–30 min, 0% B. The flow rate was maintained at 0.9 mL/min, and the sample injection volume was 10 μL. Absorbance was measured at 330 nm. Mass spectrometry (MS) analysis was on a Waters Xevo triple quadrupole (TQD) system equipped with electrospray ionization (ESI) source (Waters, Milford, MA, USA).

4.7. Haemonchus contortus Eggs

The nematode eggs were obtained from faecal samples (4–50 g) of two donor lambs (20 ± 6 kg bodyweight, BW) previously subjected to monospecific infection with 350 infective larvae (L3) of H. contortus per kg of BW (INIFAP, strain). The sheep were housed indoors on a metabolic floor with access to a feeder and drinking trough. The animals were housed following the care/welfare guidelines of the Mexican Official Rule NOM-051-ZOO-1995. Egg recovery was performed according to the technique described by Coles et al. [31].

4.8. Egg Hatching Inhibition (EHI) Test

The assays were performed in 96-microtitration plates. Four repetitions and three replicates in each treatment were considered (n = 12). The treatments were assigned as follows: step (1) hydroalcoholic extract (HA-E), aqueous fraction (Aq-F) at 0.31−5.00 mg/mL and organic fraction (EtOAc-F) at 0.03–5.00 mg/mL; step (2) subfractions (C1F1-C1F17) at 0.06–1.00 mg/mL. Here, only the bioactive subfractions were reported (see results). For each step, two suitable negative controls (methanol 2% and distilled water) were included, and additionally, a group treated with thiabendazole (0.10 mg/mL, SIGMA®, St. Louis, MO, USA) was considered as a positive control. In each well, 50 µL of an aqueous suspension containing 100 ± 15 H. contortus eggs was deposited. Then, 50 µL aliquots of the treatments and controls were deposited, giving a total volume of 100 µL. After this process, plates were incubated at room temperature (25–28 °C) for 48 h, and hatching was stopped using Lugol’s solution. The total eggs and larvae of the first and second stage of each well were counted, and the egg hatching inhibition percentage (EHI%) for each treatment was estimated using the following formula:
EHI %   = number   of   eggs number   of   larvae   +   number   of   eggs × 100

4.9. Statistical Analysis

The EHI percentage of treatments was normalised using a square root transformation and analysed based on a completely random design using ANOVA through a general linear model in SAS. Means were compared among treatments using a Tukey test at 0.05 significance. The treatments with a concentration-dependent effect were subjected to regression analysis to estimate the effective concentrations 50 and 90 (EC50 and EC90), using the PROBIT procedure [32].

5. Conclusions

The results of this study showed that the P. dulce leaves possess ovicidal effects against H. contortus. The mixture of ferulic acid, coumaric acid, luteolin 7-O-rhamnoside, and quercetin, present in the subfractions C1F9, C1F11, and C1F13, could be responsible for the anthelmintic effect. However, additional studies should be performed in order to elucidate/confirm the nematocidal effect of these compounds. The use of this plant species could be an option for the control of gastrointestinal nematodes in ruminants against the background of environmental sustainability. Nevertheless, in vivo studies with sheep experimentally and naturally infected with H. contortus or other GIN will be necessary to confirm these findings.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11192555/s1, Figure S1: 1H NMR (CD3OD, 600 MHz) of Kaempferol (1); Figure S2: 13C NMR (CD3OD, 150 MHz) of Kaempferol (1); Figure S3: 3C (DEPT) NMR (CD3OD, 150 MHz) of Kaempferol (1); Figure S4: Mass spectrum (MS) of Kaempferol (1); Figure S5: Mass spectrum (MS) of Luteolin 7-O-rhamnoside (5); Figure S6: HPLC chromatogram and UV spectrum of Kaempferol (1) standard; Figure S7: HPLC chromatogram and UV spectrum of Quercetin (2) standard; Figure S8: HPLC chromatogram and UV spectrum of Coumaric acid (3) standard; Figure S9: HPLC chromatogram and UV spectrum of Ferulic acid (4) standard; Figure S10: HPLC chromatogram and UV spectrum of Quercetin 3-O-rhamnoside (6) standard; Figure S11: Normal phase TLC of the hydroalcoholic extract (HA-E) and the ethyl acetate fraction (EtOAc-F) compared to compounds 1–4 and 6 (standards). Elution system 85:15 dichloromethane:methanol, (a) UV lamp (366 nm) before being developed and (b) revealed with flavonoids (254 nm); Figure S12: Normal phase TLC of fraction (C1F6) compared to compounds 1-4 and 6 (standards). Elution system 85:15 dichloromethane:methanol, (a) UV lamp (366 nm) before being developed and (b) revealed with flavonoids (254 nm); Figure S13: Normal phase TLC of fraction (C1F9) compared to compounds 1–4 and 6 (standards). Elution system 85:15 dichloromethane:methanol, (a) UV lamp (366 nm) before being developed and (b) revealed with flavonoids (254 nm); Figure S14: Normal phase TLC of fraction (C1F10) compared to compounds 1–4 and 6 (standards). Elution system 85:15 dichloromethane:methanol, (a) UV lamp (366 nm) before being developed and (b) revealed with flavonoids (254 nm); Figure S15: Normal phase TLC of fraction (C1F11) compared to compounds 1–4 and 6 (standards). Elution system 85:15 dichloromethane:methanol, (a) UV lamp (366 nm) before being developed and (b) revealed with flavonoids (254 nm); Figure S16: Normal phase TLC of fraction (C1F13) compared to compounds 1–4 and 6 (standards). Elution system 85:15 dichloromethane:methanol, (a) UV lamp (366 nm) before being developed and (b) revealed with flavonoids (254 nm); Figure S17: Normal phase TLC of fraction (C1F15) compared to compounds 1–4 and 6 (standards). Elution system 85:15 dichloromethane:methanol, (a) UV lamp (366 nm) before being developed and (b) revealed with flavonoids (254 nm).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology A.O.-J.; methodology, A.L.J.-C. and A.O.-J.; validation, A.V.-M., A.Z. and J.O.-P.; formal analysis, P.M.-d.G. and M.G.-C.; investigation, E.J.D.-N.; resources, A.O.-J.; data curation, M.E.L.-A. and M.G.-C.; writing—original draft preparation, P.M.-d.G., A.O.-J. and A.B.; writing—review and editing, A.O.-J. and P.M.-d.G.; visualization, supervision and project administration, A.O.-J.; funding acquisition, P.M.-d.G., A.Z. and A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Helminthology laboratory at CENID-SAI, INFAP-Mexico, and Phytochemical laboratory at CIBIS-IMSS-Mexico for the support provided for carrying the study in its facilities. This study formed part of the thesis work of Ana Laura Jimenez-Chino to obtain a degree in Biotechnology Engineering (Universidad Politécnica del Estado de Morelos) under the direction of Agustín Olmedo-Juárez. A.B. thanks FGCU and the Professional Development Fund.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tariq, K.A. A Review of the epidemiology and control of gastrointestinal nematode infections of small ruminants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 85, 693–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Harder, A. Chapter three- The biochemistry of Haemonchus contortus and other parasitic nematodes. Adv. Parasitol. 2016, 93, 69–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chagas, A.C.S.; Tupuy, O.; Santos, I.B.; Esteves, S.N. Economic impact of gastrointestinal nematodes in Morada Nova sheep in Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. 2022, 31, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rodríguez-Vivas, R.I.; Grisi, L.; Pérez-de-León, A.A.; Silva-Villela, H.; Torres-Acosta, J.F.J.; Fragoso-Sánchez, H.; Romero-Salas, D.; Rosario-Cruz, R.; Saldierna, F.; García-Carrasco, D. Potential economic impact assessment for cattle parasites in Mexico. Review. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Pecu. 2017, 8, 61–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rose-Vineer., H.; Morgan, E.R.; Hertzberg, H.; Bartley, D.J.; Bosco, A.; Charlier, J.; Chartier, C.; Claerebout, E.; de Waal, T.; Hendrickx, G.; et al. Increasing importance of anthelmintic resistance in European livestock: Creation and meta-analysis of an open database. Parasite 2020, 27, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ahuir-Baraja, A.E.; Cibot, F.; Llobat, L.; Garijo, M.M. Anthelmintic resistance: Is a solution possible? Exp. Parasitol. 2021, 230, 108169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jayawardene, K.L.T.D.; Palombo, E.A.; Boag, P.R. Natural products are a promising source for anthelmintic drug discovery. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Delgado-Núñez, E.J.; Zamilpa, A.; González-Cortazar, M.; Olmedo-Juárez, A.; Cardoso-Taketa, A.; Sánchez-Mendoza, E.; Tapia-Maruri, D.; Salinas-Sánchez, D.O.; Mendoza-de Gives, P. Isorhamnetin: A nematocidal flavonoid from Prosopis laevigata leaves against Haemonchus contortus eggs and larvae. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Marie-Magdeleine, C.; Ceriac, S.; Barde, D.J.; Minatchy, N.; Pericarpin, F.; Pommier, F.; Calif, B.; Philibert, L.; Jean-Christophe, J.; Archiméde, H. Evaluation of nutraceutical properties of Leucaena leucocephala leaf pellets fed to goat kids infected with Haemonchus contortus. BMC Vet. Res. 2020, 16, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lima, C.S.; Pereira, M.H.; Gainza, Y.A.; Hoste, H.; Regasini, L.O.; Chagas, A.C.S. Anthelmintic effect of Pterogyne nitens (Fabaceae) on eggs and larvae of Haemonchus contortus: Analyses of structure-activity relationships based on phenolic compounds. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 164, 113348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. von Son-de Fernex, E.; Alonso-Díaz, M.A.; Mendoza-de Gives, P.; Valles-de la Mora, B.; González-Cortazar, M.; Zamilpa, A.; Gallegos, E.C. Elucidation of Leucaena leucocephala anthelmintic-like phytochemicals and the ultrastructural damage generated to eggs of Cooperia spp. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 214, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Castillo-Mitre, G.F.; Olmedo-Juárez, A.; Rojo-Rubio, R.; González-Cortazar, M.; Mendoza de Gives, P.; Hernández-Beteta, E.E.; Reyes-Guerrero, D.E.; López-Arellano, M.E.; Vázquez-Armijo, J.F.; Ramírez-Vargas, G.; et al. Caffeoyl and coumaroyl derivatives from Acacia cochliacantha exhibit ovicidal activity against Haemonchus contortus. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 204, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. González-Cortazar, M.; Zamilpa, A.; López-Arellano, M.E.; Aguilar-Marcelino, L.; Reyes-Guerrero, D.E.; Olazarán-Jenkins, S.; Ramírez-Vargas, G.; Olmedo-Juárez, A.; Mendoza-de-Gives, P. Lysiloma acapulcensis leaves contain anthelmintic metabolites that reduce the gastrointestinal nematode egg population in sheep faeces. Comp. Clinic. Pathol. 2018, 27, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zarza-Albarrán, M.A.; Olmedo-Juárez, A.; Rojo-Rubio, R.; Mendoza-de Gives, P.; González-Cortazar, M.; Tapia-Maruri, D.; Mondragón-Ancelmo, J.; García-Hernández, C.; Blé-González, A.; Zamilpa, A. Galloyl flavonoids from Acacia farnesiana pods possess potent anthelmintic activity against Haemonchus contortus eggs and infective larvae. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 249, 112402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dhanisha, S.S.; Drishya, S.; Guruvayoorappan, C. Traditional knowledge to clinical trials: A review on nutritional and therapeutic potential of Pithecellobium dulce. J. Basic. Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2022, 33, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Katekhaye, S.D.; Kale, M.S. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity of Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb.) Benth wood bark and leaves. Free Rad. Antiox. 2012, 2, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bhat, M.A.; Malik, R.A.; Prakash, P. Preparation and evaluation of antibacterial potential of Pithecellobium dulce root extract against Gram positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 116, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. López-Angulo., G.; Verdugo-Gaxiola, S.E.; Montes-Avila, J.; Díaz-Camacho, S.P.; Miranda-Soto, V.; Salazar-Salas, Y.; Delgado-Vargas, F. Bioguided isolation of N-malonyl-(+)-tryptophan from the fruit of Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb.) Benth. that showed high activity against Hymenolepis nana. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 35, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Olmedo-Juárez, A.; Rojo-Rubio, R.; Arece-García, J.; Salem, A.Z.M.; Kholif, A.E.; Morales-Almaraz, E. In vitro activity of Pithecellobium dulce and Lysiloma acapulcensis on exogenous development stages of sheep gastrointestinal strongyles. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 13, 3104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Romero, N.; Areche, C.; Cubides-Cárdenas, J.; Escobar, N.; García-Beltrán, O.; Simirgiotis, M.J.; Céspedes, A. In vitro anthelmintic evaluation of Gliricidia sepium, Leucaena leucocephala, and Pithecellobium dulce: Fingerprint analysis of extracts by UHPLC-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry. Molecules 2020, 25, 3002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Singh, R.; Singh, B.; Singh, S.; Kumar, N.; Kumar, S.; Arora, S. Anti-free radical activities of kaempferol isolated from Acacia nilotica (L.) Willd. Ex. Del. Toxicol. In Vitro 2008, 22, 1965–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mondragón-Ancelmo, J.; Olmedo-Juárez, A.; Reyes-Guerrero, D.E.; Ramírez-Vargas, G.; Ariza-Román, A.E.; López-Arellano, M.E.; Mendoza-de Gives, P.; Napolitano, F. Detection of gastrointestinal nematode populations resistant to Albendazole and Ivermectin in Sheep. Animals 2019, 9, 775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. García-Hernández, C.; Rojo-Rubio, R.; Olmedo-Juárez, A.; Zamilpa, A.; Mendoza-de Gives, P.; Antonio-Romo, I.A.; Aguilar-Marcelino, L.; Arece-García, J.; Tapia-Maruri, D.; González-Cortazar, M. Galloyl derivatives from Caesalpinia coriaria exhibit in vitro ovicidal activity against cattle gastrointestinal parasitic nematodes. Exp. Parasitol. 2019, 200, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Conti, M.V.; Guzzeti, L.; Panzeri, D.; Giuseppe, R.; Coccetti, P.; Labra, M.; Cena, H. Bioactive compounds in legumes: Implications for sustainable nutrition and health in the elderly population. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 117, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cortes-Morales, J.A.; Olmedo-Juárez, A.; Trejo-Tapia, G.; González-Cortazar, M.; Domínguez-Mendoza, B.E.; Mendoza-de Gives, P.; Zamilpa, A. In vitro ovicidal activity of Baccharis conferta Kunth against Haemonchus contortus. Exp. Parasitol. 2019, 197, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. UNAM. Biblioteca Digital de la Medicina Tradicional Mexicana. Available online: http://www.medicinatradicionalmexicana.unam.mx/apmtm/termino.php?l=3&t=pithecellobium-dulce (accessed on 4 February 2022).
  27. Sneha, D.; Prashanth, S.; Kaveti, V.S.; Boggula, N. Systematic review of Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb.) Benth.: A traditional medicine herb. J. Innov. Dev. Pharm. Tech. Sci. 2020, 38, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mancilla-Montelongo, G.; Castañeda-Ramírez, G.S.; Torres-Acosta, J.F.J.; Sandoval-Castro, C.A.; Borges-Argáez, R. Evaluation of cinnamic acids and six analogues against eggs and larvae of Haemonchus contortus. Vet. Parasitol. 2019, 270, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Escareño-Díaz, S.; Alonso-Díaz, M.A.; Mendoza-de Gives, P.; Castillejo-Gallegos, E.; von Son-de Fernex, E. Anthelmintic-like activity of polyphenolic compounds and their interactions against the cattle nematode Cooperia punctata. Vet. Parasitol. 2019, 274, 108909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Plant List. Available online: www.theplantlist.org (accessed on 6 June 2022).
  31. Coles, G.C.; Bauer, C.; Borgsteede, F.H.M.; Geerts, S.; Klei, T.R.; Taylor, M.A.; Waller, P.J. World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP) methods for the detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance. Vet. Parasitol. 1992, 44, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. SAS. SAS Online Doc, Version 9.1.3. SAS; SAS: Cary, NC, USA, 2014.
Figure 1. HPLC analysis of Pithecellobium dulce leaves showing egg hatching inhibition of Haemonchus contortus eggs. (A) hydroalcoholic extract (HA-E), (B) aqueous fraction (Aq-F) and (C) organic fraction (EtOAc-F). Coumaric acid (3) and luteolin 7-O-rhamnoside (5).
Figure 1. HPLC analysis of Pithecellobium dulce leaves showing egg hatching inhibition of Haemonchus contortus eggs. (A) hydroalcoholic extract (HA-E), (B) aqueous fraction (Aq-F) and (C) organic fraction (EtOAc-F). Coumaric acid (3) and luteolin 7-O-rhamnoside (5).
Plants 11 02555 g001
Figure 2. HPLC analysis of subfractions obtained from EtOAc-F, indicating the presence of kaempferol (1), quercetin (2), coumaric acid (3), ferulic acid (4), luteolin 7-O-rhamnoside (5), quercetin 3-O-rhamnoside (6) and caffeoyl derivate (NI). NI not identified.
Figure 2. HPLC analysis of subfractions obtained from EtOAc-F, indicating the presence of kaempferol (1), quercetin (2), coumaric acid (3), ferulic acid (4), luteolin 7-O-rhamnoside (5), quercetin 3-O-rhamnoside (6) and caffeoyl derivate (NI). NI not identified.
Plants 11 02555 g002
Figure 3. Structure identified in the bioactive subfractions from Pithecellobium dulce leaves.
Figure 3. Structure identified in the bioactive subfractions from Pithecellobium dulce leaves.
Plants 11 02555 g003
Table 1. Haemonchus contortus egg hatching inhibition percentage (EHI%) after 48 h exposure to a hydroalcoholic extract and two fractions from Pithecellobium dulce leaves.
Table 1. Haemonchus contortus egg hatching inhibition percentage (EHI%) after 48 h exposure to a hydroalcoholic extract and two fractions from Pithecellobium dulce leaves.
TreatmentsMeans of Eggs and Larvae (L1 or L2) RecoveredEHI% ± s.d.
EggsLarvae
Distilled water7.12119.563.94 ± 6.61 e
Methanol (2%)7.25111.683.99 ± 2.97 e
Thiabendazole (0.1 mg/mL)105.370100 a
Hydroalcoholic extract (HA-E, mg/mL)
5.099.09298.57 ± 3.52 a
2.573.515.7597.52 ± 5.92 ab
1.2554.8736.3796.21 ± 4.83 ab
0.62114.625.595.15 ± 5.56 ab
0.31109.1275.7558.63 ± 10.09 c
Aqueous fraction (Aq-F, mg/mL)
5.0125.283.1496.87 ± 4.04 ab
2.5138.3622.1894.42 ± 7.71 ab
1.25151.751.2598.47 ± 1.87 ab
0.62125.259.3792.19 ± 7.57 ab
0.3159.3760.1253.53 ± 13.24 c
Organic fraction (EtOAc-F, mg/mL)
5.0120.080100 a
2.5107.000100 a
1.25124.500100 a
0.62154.62199.94 ± 0.16 a
0.31129.000100 a
0.15121.2522.3788.24 ± 13.76 b
0.0761.25173.7525.87 ± 6.06 d
0.0341.51173.7518.95 ± 2.80 d
abcde Means with different literal in the same column indicate statistical differences (p < 0.05), s.d = standard deviation.
Table 2. Effective concentrations required to inhibit 50% and 90% of Haemonchus contortus egg hatching after 48 h exposure to a hydroalcoholic extract and two fractions from Pithecellobium dulce leaves.
Table 2. Effective concentrations required to inhibit 50% and 90% of Haemonchus contortus egg hatching after 48 h exposure to a hydroalcoholic extract and two fractions from Pithecellobium dulce leaves.
TreatmentsEC50
(mg/mL)
Confidence Interval
(95%)
EC90
mg/mL
Confidence Interval
(95%)
LowerUpperLowerUpper
HA-E0.150.120.183.342.844.04
Aq-F0.150.120.181.631.51.78
EtOAc-F0.080.0830.0890.140.130.14
EC = effective concentration, HA-E = hydroalcoholic extract, Aq-F = aqueous fraction, EtOAc-F = organic fraction.
Table 3. Haemonchus contortus egg hatching inhibition percentage (EHI%) after 48 h exposure to subfractions obtained from the EtOAc fraction from Pithecellobium dulce leaves.
Table 3. Haemonchus contortus egg hatching inhibition percentage (EHI%) after 48 h exposure to subfractions obtained from the EtOAc fraction from Pithecellobium dulce leaves.
Subfractions/ControlsConcentration
(mg/mL)
Means of Eggs and Larvae (L1 or L2) RecoveredEHI% ± s.d.
EggsLarvae
C1F61.00113.250100 a
0.50111.500100 a
0.2597.0020.2583.33 ± 6.68 cd
0.1234.7571.7533.03 ± 6.87 e
0.06105.0096.509.67 ± 5.11 hij
C1F91.0094.500100 a
0.5082.000100 a
0.2593.370100 a
0.12119.50.7599.50 ± 0.57 a
0.06115.7516.2588.00 ± 2.58 bc
C1F101.0044.500100 a
0.5047.750100 a
0.2570.870100 a
0.1279.5017.7582.20 ± 3.32 cd
0.0615.2598.7513.38 ± 0.68 ghi
C1F111.0085.750100 a
0.5076.750100 a
0.2588.620100 a
0.12121.251.5098.84 ± 0.90 a
0.06100.2528.5078.15 ± 2.47 cd
C1F131.00128.250100 a
0.5095.250100 a
0.2587.670100 a
0.12116.000100 a
0.0696.0526.0078.42 ± 6.42 cd
C1F151.0054.759.0085.90 ± 6.48 c
0.5013.0054.5020.00 ± 5.89 fg
0.2513.8770.7515.64 ± 9.06 fgh
0.126.0069.757.91 ± 8.43 hij
0.060.00100.750.00 j
C1F18 (kaempferol)1.01.25102.251.27 ± 1.13 j
Methanol (2%)2%6.7567.758.26 ± 8.50 hij
Thiabendazole (0.1 mg/mL)0.5%12.37100100 a
abcdefhij Means with different literal in the same column indicate statistical differences (p < 0.05), s.d. = standard deviation.
Table 4. Effective concentrations required to inhibit 50% and 90% of Haemonchus contortus egg hatching after 48 h exposure to subfractions obtained of the EtOAc fraction.
Table 4. Effective concentrations required to inhibit 50% and 90% of Haemonchus contortus egg hatching after 48 h exposure to subfractions obtained of the EtOAc fraction.
TreatmentsEC50
mg/mL
Confidence Interval
(95%)
EC90
mg/mL
Confidence Interval
(95%)
LowerUpper LowerUpper
C1F60.160.150.170.290.280.31
C1F90.030.020.040.060.060.07
C1F100.090.080.090.130.120.14
C1F110.040.030.040.070.070.08
C1F130.030.030.030.080.070.08
C1F150.670.620.721.301.141.62
EC = effective concentration.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Olmedo-Juárez, A.; Jimenez-Chino, A.L.; Bugarin, A.; Zamilpa, A.; Gives, P.M.-d.; Villa-Mancera, A.; López-Arellano, M.E.; Olivares-Pérez, J.; Delgado-Núñez, E.J.; González-Cortazar, M. Phenolic Acids and Flavonoids from Pithecellobium dulce (Robx.) Benth Leaves Exhibit Ovicidal Activity against Haemonchus contortus. Plants 2022, 11, 2555. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11192555

AMA Style

Olmedo-Juárez A, Jimenez-Chino AL, Bugarin A, Zamilpa A, Gives PM-d, Villa-Mancera A, López-Arellano ME, Olivares-Pérez J, Delgado-Núñez EJ, González-Cortazar M. Phenolic Acids and Flavonoids from Pithecellobium dulce (Robx.) Benth Leaves Exhibit Ovicidal Activity against Haemonchus contortus. Plants. 2022; 11(19):2555. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11192555

Chicago/Turabian Style

Olmedo-Juárez, Agustín, Ana Laura Jimenez-Chino, Alejandro Bugarin, Alejandro Zamilpa, Pedro Mendoza-de Gives, Abel Villa-Mancera, María Eugenia López-Arellano, Jaime Olivares-Pérez, Edgar Jesús Delgado-Núñez, and Manases González-Cortazar. 2022. "Phenolic Acids and Flavonoids from Pithecellobium dulce (Robx.) Benth Leaves Exhibit Ovicidal Activity against Haemonchus contortus" Plants 11, no. 19: 2555. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11192555

APA Style

Olmedo-Juárez, A., Jimenez-Chino, A. L., Bugarin, A., Zamilpa, A., Gives, P. M. -d., Villa-Mancera, A., López-Arellano, M. E., Olivares-Pérez, J., Delgado-Núñez, E. J., & González-Cortazar, M. (2022). Phenolic Acids and Flavonoids from Pithecellobium dulce (Robx.) Benth Leaves Exhibit Ovicidal Activity against Haemonchus contortus. Plants, 11(19), 2555. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11192555

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop