Next Article in Journal
Salinity-Induced Physiological Changes in Pea (Pisum sativum L.): Germination Rate, Biomass Accumulation, Relative Water Content, Seedling Vigor and Salt Tolerance Index
Next Article in Special Issue
Mutation in the Endo-β-1,4-glucanase (KORRIGAN) Is Responsible for Thick Leaf Phenotype in Sorghum
Previous Article in Journal
Grassland Degradation Has Stronger Effects on Soil Fungal Community Than Bacterial Community across the Semi-Arid Region of Northern China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Understanding the Modus Operandi of Class II KNOX Transcription Factors in Secondary Cell Wall Biosynthesis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Protoplast-Based Transient Expression and Gene Editing in Shrub Willow (Salix purpurea L.)

1
Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA
2
School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell AgriTech, Cornell University, Geneva, NY 14456, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(24), 3490; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243490
Submission received: 11 November 2022 / Revised: 30 November 2022 / Accepted: 10 December 2022 / Published: 13 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biotechnological Advances in Biomass and Bioenergy Production)

Abstract

:
Shrub willows (Salix section Vetrix) are grown as a bioenergy crop in multiple countries and as ornamentals across the northern hemisphere. To facilitate the breeding and genetic advancement of shrub willow, there is a strong interest in the characterization and functional validation of genes involved in plant growth and biomass production. While protocols for shoot regeneration in tissue culture and production of stably transformed lines have greatly advanced this research in the closely related genus Populus, a lack of efficient methods for regeneration and transformation has stymied similar advancements in willow functional genomics. Moreover, transient expression assays in willow have been limited to callus tissue and hairy root systems. Here we report an efficient method for protoplast isolation from S. purpurea leaf tissue, along with transient overexpression and CRISPR-Cas9 mediated mutations. This is the first such report of transient gene expression in Salix protoplasts as well as the first application of CRISPR technology in this genus. These new capabilities pave the way for future functional genomics studies in this important bioenergy and ornamental crop.

1. Introduction

Willow (Salix spp.) is a diverse genus containing over three hundred species, with a native range spanning across every continent except Australia and Antarctica, including particularly high genetic diversity in the temperate regions of North America and Eurasia [1]. Willows are used for a variety of human purposes, including bioenergy and biomass production, phytoremediation and ecological restoration, as ornamentals, and in cultural applications including basket weaving and cricket bat production [2]. Biomass production of willows for carbon sequestration and bioenergy is of particular interest due to their perennial nature, low inputs, and ability to grow on marginal land [3]. One of the greatest limitations to the advancement of willow genetics and biology for biomass production is an inability to regenerate Salix shoots from tissue culture, preventing the development of stable transgenic lines and hindering further functional genomics studies. Transformation and transient expression have so far been limited to callus tissue and hairy root systems [4,5]. However, both expression systems are technically demanding, requiring at least several weeks for a single experiment as well as the use of tissue culture and antibiotic selection protocols.
Protoplast expression experiments offer a tractable alternative to callus and hairy root expression systems as they can be completed in as little as two days, are obtained in large quantities, and for Salix do not require the use of tissue culture. Protoplast transformation, CRISPR/Cas9 knockout, and expression protocols are well established in the closely related genus Populus [6]. Protoplast isolation has also been demonstrated in Salix [7], although overexpression and CRISPR/Cas9—based gene editing have not been reported. In this study, we show transient overexpression of multiple reporter genes in Salix leaf protoplasts and report on the first application of gene editing technology in willow through CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutations. These results represent a substantial advancement in willow functional genomics and biotechnology and establish the ability to perform a variety of future studies to validate the precise molecular mechanisms and function of genes in willows.

2. Results and Discussion

Six technical replicates of the S. purpurea protoplast extractions were performed, and typical protoplast yields for preparations using six leaves ranged from 8 × 105 to 20 × 105 protoplasts mL−1. This represents an improvement over current protoplast isolation methods in Populus, which require using leaves grown in tissue culture conditions. We demonstrated that large numbers of protoplasts can be obtained from greenhouse-grown leaves within two weeks of starting cuttings. This, coupled with the speed and ease of propagating willow cuttings under greenhouse conditions, provides an effectively unlimited supply of protoplasts and suggests that there is great potential for the development of high-throughput protoplast applications in this genus.
Transient expression in leaf protoplasts was successful using four vectors expressing different fluorescent proteins (Figure 1A–D). Transformation of protoplasts with constructs containing 35S: sfGFP (Figure 1A), 35S: eGFP (Figure 1B), 35S: eYGFPuv (Figure 1C), and 35S: mCherry (Figure 1D) all produced easily detectable fluorescence signals after 24–48 h of incubation. Overall, we obtained satisfactory transformation efficiencies, with all but one construct showing greater than 45% efficiency (Figure 1E). The observed variation in transformation efficiency between constructs is likely due to many factors, including cell viability and technical error during transformation. Improvement in transformation efficiency can be made through future experimental optimization for S. purpurea and other species in the same genus. These results are the first report of successful Salix protoplast transformation.
In this study, we demonstrated that CRISPR/Cas9 is functional in willow using our protoplast transient assay platform. Illumina sequencing of PCR amplicons for each target gene revealed mutations at each of six gRNA target sites (Figure 2A,B). Total sequenced reads were 351,532 for the ANGUSTIFOLIA amplicon, 434,833 for the PHYA amplicon, and 70,575 for the FRIGIDA amplicon. Gene-editing efficiencies for each gRNA were 0.44% and 0.40% for ANGUSTIFOLIA gRNA1 and gRNA2, respectively, 0.14% and 0.17% for PHYA, and 17.27% and 0.54% for FRIGIDA. Most of the mutations occurred at 3 bp upstream of PAM sequence. Only small deletions ranging from one to seven bp and single bp substitutions were observed in each individual target site. One high activity gRNA, FRIGIDA gRNA1, was identified by our transient assay, suggesting that our system may be used to test the activity of different gRNAs (Figure 2B). Large deletions were also observed between the target regions of two ANGUSTIFOLIA-specific gRNAs, indicating that multiplexed gene editing can be achieved in willow using CRISPR/Cas9. However, all but one gRNA had an editing efficiency of below 1%, whereas typical protoplast CRISPR knockout experiments analyzed with next-generation sequencing produce 2% efficiency or greater [8,9]. This low rate of mutation may be due to either poor transformation efficiency or low gRNA activity. In the future, a fluorescent marker can be included in the CRISPR/Cas9 construct as a reporter of transformation efficiency. Refinement of gRNA and PAM sites to optimize for use in Salix and testing of different promoters and terminators for Cas9 and gRNAs such as CmYLCB, NOS, or ACTIN could also improve efficiency in the future [10]. Nevertheless, the result obtained from this study provides compelling evidence that the CRISPR/Cas9 system is indeed viable in Salix protoplasts.
Taken together, the findings in this study represent a substantial advancement in Salix genomics research and can serve as the basis for future functional genomics experiments in this understudied crop. In demonstrating that both transient overexpression and CRIPSR/Cas9-based gene editing are active in Salix, we propose that additional experimental approaches involving cell suspension cultures, expression of protein-protein interaction constructs, and RNA-Seq and proteomic analysis following gene perturbation are potentially tractable methods. Such studies will dramatically advance our understanding of the Salix gene function associated with the traits related to biomass yield, bioenergy production, and horticultural applications.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Materials and Growth Condition

The plant material for protoplast isolation was obtained from fully expanded young leaves harvested from two-week-old greenwood cuttings of S. purpurea “94006” grown in a 16h photoperiod at 22 °C in the greenhouse (Figure 3).

3.2. Guide RNA Design and Vector Construction

Two CRISPR gRNAs were designed via CHOPCHOP [11] to target the single-copy genes Sapur.002G150400 (ANGUSTIFOLIA), Sapur.013G000400 (PHYA), and Sapur.15WG127800 (FRIGIDA) based on the S. purpurea genome (v5.1) from Phytozome [12]. The two gRNAs targeted sites 100–200 bp apart in the first exon of each gene (Figure 2A). The gRNAs and scaffolds for each target gene were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, USA) and separated by tRNA sequences. Each pair of gRNAs was ligated into a pKSE401 vector (Addgene, Plasmid #62202) containing an Arabidopsis U3 promoter driving the gRNAs and scaffolds, as well as a SpCas9 nuclease from Streptococcus pyogenes driven by a cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter [13]. The gene editing constructs were created using PARA [14].

3.3. Protoplast Isolation

Protoplast isolation and PEG-mediated transformation protocol described by Yuan et al., 2021 was used to isolate S. purpurea protoplasts with the following modifications: leaf digestion was performed in dark conditions at 30 rpm for four hours and following digestion, the enzyme-protoplast solution was immediately diluted without handshaking [15]. The final concentration of S. purpurea protoplasts was adjusted to approximately 8 × 105 protoplasts/mL. Protoplasts were transformed with constructs containing each of the following reporter proteins: sfGFP (Addgene, Plasmid #80129), eGFP (Addgene, Plasmid #64401), eYGFPuv [15], and mCherry (modified Addgene Plasmid #64401), each with a hygromycin plant selectable marker and kanamycin bacteria selectable marker. Protoplasts were incubated for 24–48 h prior to imaging. The percentage of cells with fluorescence signal for each fluorescent protein was calculated based on confocal microscope imaging. The images of three independent scopes were taken under a confocal microscope with 10 μL protoplasts per sample. Cell counting in each image was conducted manually.

3.4. Analysis of CRISPR/Cas9-Induced Mutation Efficiency

Following transformation with each of the three constructs containing CRISPR gRNAs, protoplasts were incubated for 48 h. Protoplast DNA was extracted according to a protocol by Weigel and Glazebrook, 2009 [16] PCR amplification of each target region was performed using Q5 polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). Next-generation sequencing of amplicons was performed via Illumina 2 × 150 bp platform (Genewiz, South Plainfield, NJ, USA) and the mutation profile for each gRNA was quantified using Cas-Analyzer [17]. The efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 mutations was determined by calculating the number of Illumina reads supporting mutation events at each gRNA divided by the total number of sequenced reads.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.H. and G.Y.; Methodology, B.H., G.Y. and Y.L.; Formal Analysis, B.H.; Investigation, B.H.; Resources, B.H., G.Y., Y.L. and X.Y.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, B.H.; Writing-Review and Editing, B.H., G.Y., Y.L., L.B.S., G.A.T. and X.Y.; Visualization, B.H.; Supervision, X.Y. and L.B.S. Project Administration, X.Y., Funding Acquisition, B.H., X.Y. and G.A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science Graduate Student Research (SCGSR) Program and the Center for Bioenergy Innovation, a DOE Bioenergy Research Center supported by the Biological and Environmental Research program. Oak Ridge National Laboratory is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract Number DE-AC05-00OR22725. A Pre-doctoral Research Fellowship from the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute supported BLH for Food and Agriculture (award #2021-67034-35116).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Disclosure

This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The Department of Energy will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan).

References

  1. Argus, G.W. Infrageneric classification of Salix (Salicaceae) in the new world. Syst. Bot. Monogr. 1997, 52, 1–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kuzovkina, Y.A.; Weih, M.; Romero, M.A.; Charles, J.; Hust, S.; McIvor, I.; Karp, A.; Trybush, S.; Labrecque, M.; Teodorescu, T.I. Salix: Botany and global horticulture. Hortic. Rev. 2007, 34, 447–489. [Google Scholar]
  3. Stoof, C.R.; Richards, B.K.; Woodbury, P.B.; Fabio, E.S.; Brumbach, A.R.; Cherney, J.; Das, S.; Geohring, L.; Hansen, J.; Hornesky, J. Untapped potential: Opportunities and challenges for sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the Northeast USA. BioEnergy Res. 2015, 8, 482–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Guan, Q.; He, M.; Ma, H.; Liao, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, S. Construction of genetic transformation system of Salix mongolica: In vitro leaf-based callus induction, adventitious buds differentiation, and plant regeneration. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2018, 132, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gomes, C.; Dupas, A.; Pagano, A.; Grima-Pettenati, J.; Paiva, J.A.P. Hairy Root Transformation: A Useful Tool to Explore Gene Function and Expression in Salix spp. Recalcitrant to Transformation. Front Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Guo, J.; Morrell-Falvey, J.L.; Labbé, J.L.; Muchero, W.; Kalluri, U.C.; Tuskan, G.A.; Chen, J.-G. Highly efficient isolation of Populus mesophyll protoplasts and its application in transient expression assays. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Vahala, T.; Eriksson, T. Callus production from willow (Salix viminalis L.) protoplasts. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1991, 27, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brandt, K.M.; Gunn, H.; Moretti, N.; Zemetra, R.S. A streamlined protocol for wheat (Triticum aestivum) protoplast isolation and transformation with CRISPR-Cas ribonucleoprotein complexes. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Woo, J.W.; Kim, J.; Kwon, S.I.; Corvalán, C.; Cho, S.W.; Kim, H.; Kim, S.-G.; Kim, S.-T.; Choe, S.; Kim, J.-S. DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 1162–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hassan, M.M.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, G.; De, K.; Chen, J.-G.; Muchero, W.; Tuskan, G.A.; Qi, Y.; Yang, X. Construct design for CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2021, 26, 1133–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Labun, K.; Montague, T.G.; Krause, M.; Torres Cleuren, Y.N.; Tjeldnes, H.; Valen, E. CHOPCHOP v3: Expanding the CRISPR web toolbox beyond genome editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W171–W174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Goodstein, D.M.; Shu, S.; Howson, R.; Neupane, R.; Hayes, R.D.; Fazo, J.; Mitros, T.; Dirks, W.; Hellsten, U.; Putnam, N.; et al. Phytozome: A comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 40, D1178–D1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Xing, H.-L.; Dong, L.; Wang, Z.-P.; Zhang, H.-Y.; Han, C.-Y.; Liu, B.; Wang, X.-C.; Chen, Q.-J. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Yuan, G.; Martin, S.; Hassan, M.M.; Tuskan, G.A.; Yang, X. PARA: A New Platform for the Rapid Assembly of gRNA Arrays for Multiplexed CRISPR Technologies. Cells 2022, 11, 2467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yuan, G.; Lu, H.; Tang, D.; Hassan, M.M.; Li, Y.; Chen, J.-G.; Tuskan, G.A.; Yang, X. Expanding the application of a UV-visible reporter for transient gene expression and stable transformation in plants. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Weigel, D.; Glazebrook, J. Quick miniprep for plant DNA isolation. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2009, 2009, pdb.prot5179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Park, J.; Lim, K.; Kim, J.-S.; Bae, S. Cas-analyzer: An online tool for assessing genome editing results using NGS data. Bioinformatics 2017, 33, 286–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (A) sfGFP overexpression; (B) eGFP overexpression; (C) eYGFPuv overexpression; (D) mCherry overexpression; (E) percent transformation efficiency of each fluorescent protein tested shown as mean ± standard deviation of three independent scopes.
Figure 1. (A) sfGFP overexpression; (B) eGFP overexpression; (C) eYGFPuv overexpression; (D) mCherry overexpression; (E) percent transformation efficiency of each fluorescent protein tested shown as mean ± standard deviation of three independent scopes.
Plants 11 03490 g001
Figure 2. (A) Schematic showing the T-DNA design for CRIPSR/Cas9 mediated knockout, exons are shown in blue and gRNA binding sites in red, relative gene lengths are not shown to scale; (B) Alignments of CRISPR mutations with read counts (left) and mutation type (right) for each of the six gRNAs. For brevity, alternative haplotypes with the same mutation were combined, PAM sequences are highlighted in red, and substitutions are highlighted in green.
Figure 2. (A) Schematic showing the T-DNA design for CRIPSR/Cas9 mediated knockout, exons are shown in blue and gRNA binding sites in red, relative gene lengths are not shown to scale; (B) Alignments of CRISPR mutations with read counts (left) and mutation type (right) for each of the six gRNAs. For brevity, alternative haplotypes with the same mutation were combined, PAM sequences are highlighted in red, and substitutions are highlighted in green.
Plants 11 03490 g002
Figure 3. Image of two-week-old cuttings of Salix purpurea clone 94006, arrows point to leaves used for protoplast extraction.
Figure 3. Image of two-week-old cuttings of Salix purpurea clone 94006, arrows point to leaves used for protoplast extraction.
Plants 11 03490 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hyden, B.; Yuan, G.; Liu, Y.; Smart, L.B.; Tuskan, G.A.; Yang, X. Protoplast-Based Transient Expression and Gene Editing in Shrub Willow (Salix purpurea L.). Plants 2022, 11, 3490. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243490

AMA Style

Hyden B, Yuan G, Liu Y, Smart LB, Tuskan GA, Yang X. Protoplast-Based Transient Expression and Gene Editing in Shrub Willow (Salix purpurea L.). Plants. 2022; 11(24):3490. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243490

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hyden, Brennan, Guoliang Yuan, Yang Liu, Lawrence B. Smart, Gerald A. Tuskan, and Xiaohan Yang. 2022. "Protoplast-Based Transient Expression and Gene Editing in Shrub Willow (Salix purpurea L.)" Plants 11, no. 24: 3490. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243490

APA Style

Hyden, B., Yuan, G., Liu, Y., Smart, L. B., Tuskan, G. A., & Yang, X. (2022). Protoplast-Based Transient Expression and Gene Editing in Shrub Willow (Salix purpurea L.). Plants, 11(24), 3490. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243490

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop