Next Article in Journal
Responses of Caribbean Mangroves to Quaternary Climatic, Eustatic, and Anthropogenic Drivers of Ecological Change: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Exogenous Phytohormones and Fertilizers Enhance Jatropha curcas L. Growth through the Regulation of Physiological, Morphological, and Biochemical Parameters
Previous Article in Journal
Strigolactones in Plants and Their Interaction with the Ecological Microbiome in Response to Abiotic Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of the Impacts of Potassium Bicarbonate, Moringa oleifera Seed Extract, and Bacillus subtilis on Sugar Beet Powdery Mildew
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Induction of Male Sterility by Targeted Mutation of a Restorer-of-Fertility Gene with CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Brassica napus L.

1
National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Rapeseed Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
2
Soybean Research Institute, National Center for Soybean Improvement, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Soybean (General Ministry of Agriculture), Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
3
Wuhan Vegetable Research Institute, Wuhan Academy of Agricultural Science and Technology, Wuhan 430065, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(24), 3501; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243501
Submission received: 13 September 2022 / Revised: 14 November 2022 / Accepted: 29 November 2022 / Published: 13 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Regulation of Crop Quality and Stress Responses)

Abstract

:
Brassica napus L. (canola, oil seed rape) is one of the world’s most important oil seed crops. In the last four decades, the discovery of cytoplasmic male-sterility (CMS) systems and the restoration of fertility (Rf) genes in B. napus has improved the crop traits by heterosis. The homologs of Rf genes, known as the restoration of fertility-like (RFL) genes, have also gained importance because of their similarities with Rf genes. Such as a high non-synonymous/synonymous codon replacement ratio (dN/dS), autonomous gene duplications, and a possible engrossment in fertility restoration. B. napus contains 53 RFL genes on chromosomes A9 and C8. Our research aims to study the function of BnaRFL11 in fertility restoration using the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technique. A total of 88/108 (81.48%) T0 lines, and for T1, 110/145 (75%) lines carried T-DNA insertions. Stable mutations were detected in the T0 and T1 generations, with an average allelic mutation transmission rate of 81%. We used CRISPR-P software to detect off-target 50 plants sequenced from the T0 generation that showed no off-target mutation, signifying that if the designed sgRNA is specific for the target, the off-target effects are negligible. We also concluded that the mutagenic competence of the designed sgRNAs mediated by U6-26 and U6-29 ranged widely from 31% to 96%. The phenotypic analysis of bnarfl11 revealed defects in the floral structure, leaf size, branch number, and seed production. We discovered a significant difference between the sterile line and fertile line flower development after using a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope. The pollen visibility test showed that the pollen grain had utterly degenerated. The cytological observations of homozygous mutant plants showed an anther abortion stage similar to nap-CMS, with a Orf222, Orf139, Ap3, and nad5c gene upregulation. The bnarfl11 shows vegetative defects, including fewer branches and a reduced leaf size, suggesting that PPR-encoding genes are essential for the plants’ vegetative and reproductive growth. Our results demonstrated that BnaRFL11 has a possible role in fertility restoration. The current study’s findings suggest that CRISPR/Cas9 mutations may divulge the functions of genes in polyploid species and provide agronomically desirable traits through a targeted mutation.

1. Introduction

Rapeseed is a globally important crop that provides ingestion products for humans and animal feed, such as oil products, proteins, and raw materials for industrialized products worldwide [1,2]. Male sterility is one of the most effective heterosis techniques for increasing crop production. Maternal inheritance is essential for hybrid breeding programs and mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes. CMS is a maternally inherited trait in flowering plants that cannot produce functional pollen [3]. Several cellular metabolic processes mandatory for higher plants, such as ATP production by oxidative phosphorylation, occur in mitochondria. Due to a mitochondrial impairment, cytoplasmic male sterility offers unique mechanisms for revealing the genetic association between nuclear genomes and mitochondria in plants [4]. The most common male sterility induction mechanisms in rapeseed are GMS, CMS, and chemical gametocide [5]. In many plants, CMS traits are determined by ORFs encoded by the mitochondrial genome. Typically, rapeseed has two CMS mitotypes, nap and Pol. According to previous studies, the CMS in rapeseed is of the following types: nap CMS [6], ogu CMS [7], pol CMS, Moricandia arvensis [8], shan2A [9], Tour CMS [10], Nca CMS [11], oxa CMS [12], Nsa [13], inap CMS, and hau CMS [14].
The effects of mitochondrial genes controlling cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) can be suppressed by fertility restoration genes (Rf). Several Rf genes in rapeseed and other crops encode the pentatricopeptide repeat protein (PPR) family [15]. PPR proteins are a group of pattern-specific single-stranded RNA-associated proteins found in terrestrial plants that regulate post-transcriptional mechanisms, such as RNA degradation, cleavage, stability, splicing, and genome editing in mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes [16].
According to previous research, the Rf genes found in petunia [17], rice [18,19], radish [20,21], and sorghum [22] are members of the pentatricopeptide repeat gene family. In Brassicaceae, crops have multiple fertility restorer genes (Rf) encoding PPR proteins such as Nap-orf222-Rfn [23], Pol-orf224-Rfp [23], Ogu-orf138-Rfo [24], Tour-orf263-Rf1_Rf2_ [25,26], Kos-orf125-Rfk [24,27], Nsa-orf224,orf309, orf346-unknown [28], and Shaan2a-orf224-1-Shaan2b [29]. Previous studies have revealed that both Rf-CMS genes interact throughout evolution, which may explain why all cloned Rf-PPR genes share a common ancestor [30,31].
According to several studies, Rf-PPR genes are also recruited to mitochondria, which block CMS gene products’ accretion [32]. Additionally, many Rf genes encoding PPR proteins are invariably present in clusters of linked Rf-PPR-like genes (RFL) [33,34]. RFL-rich areas contain many Rf-PPR genes, and it is hypothesized that most RFL genes in the same chromosomal region are functional restorer genes. For instance, the rice chromosome 10 RFL-rich area contains Rf1 and Rf4 [35,36]. The Rf8 locus in maize is located in an RFL cluster on chromosome 2 [37].
Fortunately, recent research has revealed that 53 RFL genes have been discovered in Brassica napus. It has been demonstrated that 10 and 18 BnaRFLs assemble into highly dense clusters on chromosomes A9 and C8, respectively. These nominated restorer BnaRFLs on chromosomes A9 and C8 likely play a conserved role in mitochondrial RNA processing. It can be concluded that six BnaRFLs are candidates for fertility restorer genes (RFL3, RFL4, RFL5, RFL8, RFL15, and RFL41), four genes are similar to restorer genes (RFL2, RFL10, RFL11, and RFL42), and two restore genes (Rfn-RFL6 and Rfp-RFL13) clustered together in the phylogenetic tree, indicating that these genes were the most likely restorer gene members in the CMS rapeseed model. When comparing BnaRFL to other known restorer genes, it was discovered that all the identified BnaRFLs had 80 amino acid motifs, suggesting that BnaRFL could help in a rapeseed fertility restoration. It indicates that the RFL genes revealed in rapeseed have a possible role in fertility restoration on the A9 and C8 chromosomes [29].
Furthermore, they discovered BnRFL13 (Rfp) and BnRFL6 (Rfn), which have already been proven to be restorer genes in Pol and nap CMS in rapeseed [37,38,39]. RFL genes, grouped on chromosomes A9 and C8, have been identified as restorer genes in the rapeseed CMS system. These genes have a significant impact on mitochondrial RNA processing [29].
Consequently, we can learn how putative RFL genes restore rapeseed fertility. The CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing method has recently been extensively used in rapeseed to develop BnTT8 plants with a double mutant phenotype, displaying increased oil and protein levels with a changed fatty acid (F.A.) content but no major yield defects [40]. In the current study, we used this technique to develop a BnaRFL11 mutant to induce mutations by knocking out the RFL gene, a candidate for fertility restoration in rapeseed CMS.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

In the present study, a pure line of B. napus Westar (nap-cytoplasm) was used as the source of transformation. The seeds were obtained from the National Engineering Research Center of Rapeseed (Wuhan, China). Wild-type plants and transgenic lines were grown in a greenhouse under (16/8 h (h) light/dark cycle at 22 °C).

2.2. Phylogenetic and Bioinformatics Analysis

All Brassica napus selected gene sequences, and other species’ homologs, were subjected to Mega 7 (https://www.megasoftware.net/ accessed on 20 May 2019) for phylogenetic analysis using the neighbor-joining method. The sequences for the trees that only contained Brassica and Arabidopsis were downloaded from BRAD and TAIR, respectively, and conserved motifs were identified using the MEME online suit (http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme, accessed on 25 May 2019) with the default settings [41].

2.3. Computational sgRNA Design and Selection

The sgRNAs were designed using the CRISPR-P web tool (http://cbi.hzau.edu.cn/cgi-bin/CRISPR accessed on 25 May 2019) [42]. First, we found all possible sgRNA sequences in specific target genes with a G.C. content (45~60%) and an on-target score (score value > 0.6). The off-target scores were then calculated based on a previous study’s scoring system of off-target sites [43].

2.4. Construction of Binary Vectors and Genetic Transformation of Plants

To construct Cas9/sgRNA-expressing binary vectors, variant sgRNAs with a sequence specificity were designed for the gene of interest using the web-based tool CRISPR-P (http://cbi.hzau.edu.cn/cgi-bin/CRISPR, accessed on 25 May 2019). For constructing vectors using a multiplex genome targeting system, the binary pHSE401-2gR/Cas9 was arranged by Prof. Wang Zhiping (Chen Qijun, College of Biology, China Agricultural University China) and used to construct a library according to the findings of [44]. The desired constructs were monitored by sequencing and finally transformed into B. napus using the Agrobacterium-mediated hypocotyl method, as reported previously [45]. The transgenic lines were confirmed using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and antibiotic selection markers. The oligo primers used for preparing the sgRNA vectors are listed in (Table S1).

2.5. Identification of Transgenic Mutant Plants and Potential Off-Targets

The presence of the T-DNA construct was assessed by PCR using CPA F/R gene-specific primers. A PCR was performed to amplify the genomic region surrounding the CRISPR target sites using specific primers (Table S1), and the mutations were screened using the PAGE method previously described [46]. To confirm the PAGE-based genotyping results, we used the high-throughput tracking of mutations via the T.A. cloning of the PCR products. The pMD18-T vector (Takara) was used for T.A. cloning and sequencing. The potential off-target sites were identified using CRISPR-P (http://cbi.hzau.edu.cn/cgi-bin/CRISPR, accessed on 5 June 2020). The PCR amplified an approximately 250-bp DNA sequence covering each off-target site. The primers used are listed in (Table S1). For each target gene, the mixed genomic DNA from T0-edited plants was used as the template, and wild-type DNA was included as a control. All the PCR products were purified and mixed in equal amounts (50 ng each) as a single sample. The DNA library construction and sequencing were performed using the T.A. cloning method.

2.6. RNA Extraction, RT-PCR

The total RNA was extracted by Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). The total RNA (5 μg) was treated with DNase (Thermo Fermentas, Waltham, MA, USA), purified, and precipitated using ethanol. The cDNA was obtained by reverse transcription using Superscript III according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The SYBR Green I master PCR kit was used for real-time PCR with gene-specific primers on a Light Cycler 480.

2.7. Histological Analyses

2.7.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis

Fresh WT (Westar) and mutant plant pollen grains were air-dried for approximately 30 min before viewing with a Hitachi S 4700 scanning electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV.

2.7.2. Pollen Fertility Examination

The pollen sampled from the W.T. and mutant plants’ rapeseed buds immediately before flowering were stained with 1% (w/v) acetocarmine solution to analyze the pollen viability. Three biological replicates were used for this study. The stained pollen grains were visualized, and the images were recorded using a Leica DMIRB fluorescence microscope.

2.7.3. Cytological Analysis

The sections of flower buds from the CMS and fertile plants were obtained following the method described in [47]. The sample was embedded and sectioned at a 6 to 10 μm thickness using a Leica 2035 Biocut. The sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (0.5%) for the anthers. The images were captured using a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope.

2.8. Field Experiments and Phenotyping

Wild-type plants and T0 and T1 transgenic lines were kept in a greenhouse under a photoperiod (16/8 h light/dark at 22 °C) in 2019 and 2020. After screening, the homozygous mutant lines were grown during the rapeseed crop season (2020–2021) in the experimental field of Huazhong Agriculture University, Wuhan, China. The experiment was performed on field plants, followed by three replicates with a complete block design. In one row, approximately 11–12 plants were planted; each row followed the same procedure, with a distance observed in one row of 21 cm, followed by a 30 cm distance in each row. The field management of each line was performed using a standard breeding method.

3. Results

3.1. Bioinformatic Analysis of BnaRFL11 Gene in Westar

According to the genome information, B. napus contains one copy of BnaRFL11. (http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/brassicanapus/, accessed on 20 May 2019). The DNA and protein sequence alignments were similar for a single copy of the BnaA09g45590D, At1g12300, and At1g12620 genes (Figures S1 and S2). BnaRFL11 and Arabidopsis homologs DNA sequence were given in to MEME “(http://meme-suite.org/, accessed on 25 May 2019)” to search for the conserved motifs between the selected gene protein sequences (Figure 1b). According to the output, all the motifs were highly conserved in these DNA sequences, suggesting a similarity in function (Figure 1b). The phylogenetic tree showed that a single copy of BnaRFL11 was highly similar to its homologs in A. thaliana and Rfn (RFL6) (Figure 1a).

3.2. CRISPR/Cas9 Vector Construction to Knock out the BnaRFL11 Gene in Rapeseed

Many fertility restorer genes have been reported to encode the PPR protein family essential for a fertility restoration in petunia, radish, rice, Arabidopsis, and Brassica species [48,49]. Thus, the modification of PPR-encoding genes may induce male sterility in rapeseed. We used the pure Westar line of B. napus, which is amenable to an Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. A single copy of BnaRFL11 (BnaA09.PPR.AA09) has six exons, similar to the Arabidopsis sister genes. Two sgRNA (S1–S2) were designated, employing the “CRISPR-P” [44] to generate point mutations in a single copy of BnaRFL11 using a Cas9 gene-editing technique (Figure 2 and Figure S3). S1 and S2 are located on the different exons of the BnaRFL11 gene.
We used a multiplex genome-editing technique with a single CRISPR/Cas9 vector. The CRISPR vector based on pCAMBIA was arranged with these two sgRNAs with Cas9 driven by U6-26p as the promoter of the Arabidopsis U6 gene; U6-26t is the terminator of the U6-26 gene with the downstream sequence. The CaMV35S promoter was used for the Cas9 protein expression analysis. In addition, the U6-26p and U6-29p promoters were used to drive S1 and S2 from Arabidopsis [44] (Figure 2b). Such a design will determine which promoter is best for generating an adequate mutation in the desired gene sequence with the Cas9 protein expression in B. napus.

3.3. Identification of Mutation Patterns in the Transgenic Plants

The BnaRFL11 CRISPR/Cas9 vector was positively transferred into Westar by an Agrobacterium transformation, and 108 independent lines were developed for bnarfl11 (Figure 3). To check the positive transgenic plants through a PCR using the construct-specific primers, 88/108 (81.48%) of the T0 lines carried T-DNA insertions, and for T1, 110/145 (75%) lines carried T-DNA insertions (Table 1). Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) was used to identify the edited lines. Following the standard procedure, the PCR products from each target site were denatured, renatured, and separated. This method is based on the slower migration of heteroduplex DNA (mutation) than of homoduplex DNA (non-mutation) on native PAGE [46]. The genotyping results of many plants displayed band profiles that differed from those on the non-denaturing PAGE gels in wild-type plants (W.T.), showing the presence of mutations at the target sites (Figure S4).
We used a high-throughput tracking system of mutations, the T.A. cloning of PCR products (gel recovery and ligation of DNA), to detect T0 and T1 positive transgenic plant mutations to authenticate the PAGE results. The site-specific primers for each target were designed based on the SNP differences. For each target, forward and reverse primers covered the target site, and both primers were designed within 20–80 nucleotides from the target site (Figure S5).
Transgenic plants were sequenced for each targeted area following T.A. cloning to calculate the mutation rate correctly. The sequencing chromatograms of each line were manually examined. When the sequencing chromatograms demonstrated a nucleotide substitution (deletion, insertion, or substitution) or several indications (overlapping peaks) at the sgRNA target locations, we concluded that mutations were successfully induced (Table S2), indicating that T. A. clone-based sequencing is an effective and valuable technique for identifying plant mutations. CRISPR/Cas9 induces mutations in the designed S1 and S2 targets in a single copy of the BnaRFL11. Of the 88 transgenic plants, a total of 70 T0 mutant lines were examined; 25/70 (35.71%) loci of bnarfl11 showed putative heterozygous (Hetro) alterations, 7/70 (10%) loci had chimeric changes, and more than half 38/70 (54.28%) of the loci were homozygous (Homo) mutations. Mutant lines with single and quadruple mutations were selected for the genotyping and phenotypic analysis. Seventeen mutant lines were selected from the 70 for the T1 generation for a further confirmation (Table S2).

3.4. Isolation of Mutants with Transgenic Elements in T0 and T1 Generations

To develop stable mutant lines, 17 T0 lines carrying mutations and a male-sterile phenotype in bnarfl11 were crossed with the wild type to obtain the seeds, and an individual T1 generation was genotyped through the T.A. clone. The observed transmission rate of the allelic mutations from T0 mutant plants to T1 progenies ranged from 35% to 100% in bnarfl11, but the average transmission rate from T0 to T1 plants with allelic mutations was 81% (Table S3). For example, the detected mutations in the T1 generation matched the observed mutations in the related T0 lines (Table S2). Homozygous mutations were detected in the T1 plants generated at more than two loci, indicating that the next-generation mutant was stably inherited and permanently exhibited homozygous genotypes (Table S3). Interestingly, one and two new mutations were identified in the T1 lines.
In contrast, these mutations were not present in T0 lines at the S2 site of bnarfl11 (Table S2), indicating that wild-type sites were modified during the development of independent lines with a low efficiency. Consistently, the observed mutation and male sterility phenotypes in the corresponding bnarfl11-1, bnarfl11-5, and bnarfl11-8 T0 plants matched the detected changes and detected phenotypes in the next T1 (bnarfl11-1-5, bnarfl11-5-8, and bnarfl11-8-3) progeny lines (Table S3 and Figure 4). Thus, the sequencing data of the heritable changes at both target sites of bnarfl11 (BnaA09g45590D) after a T0 to T1 generation provides strong evidence that the constant Cas9-induced germline mutation transfer of mutations in B. napus is achievable (Figure 4). To screen the mutants with a targeted modification without integrating foreign DNA into the B. napus genome, we performed a PCR analysis of the T0 and T1 generations using Cas9-888 and U6-26p primers to confirm the positive transgenic plants. The Cas9 vector with T-DNA was not detected in 20 of 108 (18.51%) T0 plants and 35/145 (24.1%) T1 plants originating from 17 independent T0 lines (Table 1). Altogether, various bnarfl11 single, double, triple, and quadruple homozygous transgene-free T-DNA mutants were obtained in the T1 generation. Thus, transgene-free T-DNA plants carry out the desired gene modifications that might be obtained through heritable segregation in B. napus.

3.5. CRISPR’s Off-Target Effects on Mutant Lines (T0) in B. napus

In the current study, we used CRISPR-P software to detect off-targets. We searched for putative off-targets with similar identities to the two sgRNAs used for an on-target mutation in Brassica napus with the help of “CRISPR-P” [50]. Some off-target genes were identified for the selected sgRNAs (Table S4). There were four off-targets for S1 with a maximum of four mismatches, whereas S2 had three off-targets with a maximum of four mismatches in BnaRFL11. We sequenced 50 plants from the T0 generation that showed no off-target mutations, signifying that if the designed sgRNA is specific for the target, the off-target effects are negligible. It also emphasized that the male-sterile phenotype detected in bnarfl11 was due to an induced mutation in BnaA09g45590D and not by off-target effects. Therefore, the CRISPR/Cas9 system can induce stable and specific mutations in the B. napus genome.

3.6. Editing Efficiency of sgRNAs in BnaRFL11

Different sgRNAs have different mutation rates. Therefore, the two sgRNAs for the gene ensured a high rate of mutation (Table S5). Interestingly, these sgRNAs created a targeted mutation in a single copy of BnaRFL11 and developed single, double, triple, and quadrable mutations in the T0 generation (Table S2, Figure 4). The highest sgRNA editing efficiency was recorded at S1 (64.81%) in bnarfl11 and S2 (46.29%) in bnarfl11 (Table S5). This suggests that the practical selection of sgRNAs is crucial for effectively generating mutations in the target sequence. The efficiency of sgRNA depends on the promoters expressing the Cas9 protein in B. napus. The mutagenic competence of the designed sgRNAs mediated by U6-26 and U6-29 ranged from 31% to 96% (Table S5), indicating that not every promoter can effectively mediate genome editing in B. napus. This is the first time a highly conserved bnarfl11 gene has been knocked out in B. napus to generate quadrable mutations. The generation of quadrable mutations in a single copy of bnarfl11 was due to the highly efficient design of sgRNAs.

3.7. Morphological Analysis of bnarfl11 Mutant Plants and Pollen Viability Test

For bnarfl11 gene-phenotype analysis, all homozygous mutant T1 lines were grown in the experimental field of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
There were no morphological differences between sterile and fertile plants during the shoot and root growth cycles. The morphology of fertile flower buds and flowers of bnarfl11 differed significantly during the later stages of development. We discovered a significant difference between the sterile line and fertile line anther development after using a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy. The petals shrank and contracted; there was no pollen and much less nectary in the sterile plants, whereas the fertile plant was stable, with wild-type stamen and petal growth and regular nectary. The fertile flowers were larger than the bnarfl11 flowers. During the growth process, the filaments and anthers of sterile flowers are often smaller than those of fertile flowers. (Figure 5a,b) shows the wild-type side view and upper view with normal anther development (Figure 5c,d). The bnarfl11 side view and upper view mutant anther development (Figure 5a–d).
Furthermore, sterile anthers produced very diminutive but degenerated pollen and did not affect the pistil growth. For the pollen viability test, staining with a 1% (w/v) acetocarmine solution showed that bnarfl11 had no pollen if some flowers succeeded in producing anthers. The pollen visibility test showed that the pollen grains were degenerated entirely (Figure 6a,b). As mentioned in many research articles, the PPR mutant showed many morphological defects; therefore, bnarfl11 showed vegetative defects, including fewer branches and a reduced leaf size. (Figure 7a–f) shows various stages from bud development to seed production, and sterile plants produced significantly less seed than W.T. while crossing with the wild type to produce pure F1 hybrid seeds with a stable Cas9 vector transmission.

3.8. Cytological Analysis of Anther Abortion in bnarfl11

Theis and Robbelen (1990) described all the fertile anther stages of development; according to them, the results were as follows.

Development of bnarfl11 Anthers

There was no structural distinction between fertile and non-fertile individuals in the 1st stage named primordial. Distinctions emerge when primordial tissue is divided into sporogenous, vascular, and parenchymal tissues. During the early stages, the sterile buds lose one to three locks per anther than fertile buds, producing four horizontal, angular locules. In sterile flowers, the number of locules varies from one to another.
Furthermore, in sterile buds, the development of locules inside an anther has polarity: adaxial locks often grow, while other locks are mostly sterile. The tapetum is frequently dense and disconnected from the microspore mother cells (MMC) of growing CMS locules. Surprisingly, this has little effect on their inconsistency: sexual cell division occurs in locules, and Tds segregate into immature pollen in the same way as fertile lines do. Both locules inside and between the fertile anthers mature simultaneously, going through various stages of development simultaneously. The fusion of two adaxial locks and the early displacement of a tapetum from its locule layer are typical defects in CMS anthers. Rather than dividing fibrous tissue throughout the MMC stage, the tapetum in sterile anthers is frequently distinguished during the MMC process. The pollen grains that grew within the formed locules grew as fertile pollen but became degenerated, considering the numerous structural variations detected in the CMS anthers (Figure 8a–p and Figure 9a–d).

3.9. The Behavior of nap-CMS Causing Gene in bnarfl11

First, we checked the cytoplasm type using the specific primers designed by [23] (Table S1) and found that the cytoplasm type was nap-cytoplasm (Figure 10a). Therefore, we can say that the sterility type observed was nap-CMS. To determine the expression of the nap-CMS-causing gene, we performed qRT-PCR. Because AP3 is essential for determining the individuality and behavioral symmetry of petals and stamens, its expression was significantly high in buds and petals. Furthermore, the expression of orf222, orf139, and nad5c was significantly upregulated in the stamens and petals in the sterile bud compared to other organs of plants and the wild type (Figure 10b–f).

4. Discussion

4.1. In B. napus, the CRISPR/Cas9 System Is Highly Effective in Producing Targeted Mutations

Since it is easy to produce mutations in single genes or various genetic sequences with unknown functions, the CRISPR/Cas9 system has enormous potential for facilitating plant functional studies [51]. However, the challenge of rapidly producing and detecting high-efficiency stable homozygous mutations and the ability to mutate multiple targeted genes simultaneously is a real benefit of CRISPR for functional genomics in plants [52]. In the present study, we used Cas9 as a single guided RNA to generate targeted rapeseed mutations and to support a stable mutation transmission across the generations (Tables S2 and S3). In comparison to Pubi, we used the U6-26p promoter, which showed a higher Cas9 epigenetic modification and editing ability in rapeseed, which contradicted a previous study [44] that suggested the Pubi promoter in dicot plants for Cas9 proteins than U6-26p [53]. The efficient knockout of bnarfl11 rapeseed homologs via the CRISPR/Cas9 system induced male sterility and similar observations in Arabidopsis and demonstrated the use of sgRNA via the CRISPR/Cas9 system to induce targeted mutations in the most critical Brassica crop cultivation traits based on the knowledge of the model plant gene function. This study evaluated the editing accuracy of a single copy of BnaRFL11. We examined 15 possible off-target loci from T0 mutant plants, none of which showed induced CRISPR/Cas9 mutations, suggesting that well-designed specific sgRNA does not target any other site, and there is a marginal risk of off-target effects (Table S4).
Several main factors affect the sgRNA potency in plants, including Cas9 and sgRNA expression values, G.C. content %, targeting circumstances, and the key targeted structure of sgRNAs [53]. In the present study, targeted deletions in most transgenic positives, S1 and S2, resulted in high levels of single-target DSBs. We also discovered that the G.C. content of the current study sgRNAs ranged from 45% to 65%, optimal for sgRNAs, and the mutagenesis performance ranged from 0% to 65.10% at T0 for the two sgRNAs (Table S5), suggesting that almost all the promoters were involved in rapeseed genome editing. The effectiveness of the target site, the guiding RNA design, the adequacy of the Cas9 expression, and the inter-analysis of the transformants for more numerous sgRNA-based plant editing are all factors that limit the editing performance. The editing efficacy of sgRNA (S1–S2) has been evaluated using a single copy of the bnarfl11. These sgRNAs demonstrated a dramatic efficiency in genome editing for targeting the same gene, such as 64.81% at S1 and 46.29% at S2. We also compared the editing efficiency of sgRNA in our present study with that of the previous study. [54] targeted three genes, BnCLV1, BnCLV2, and BnCLV3, with ten different sgRNA driven by the same promoter. [40] also targeted three genes, BnIND, BnALC, and BnTT8, using 12 different sgRNAs driven by the same promoter. The data in (Table S5) represent that the editing efficiency of the U6-26p promoter was higher than that of the other promoters. In short, variations in the efficacy of the genome editing of several sgRNAs most likely indicate changes in the nucleotide composition of the sgRNAs.

4.2. Precise Identification of Allelic Variation with T.A. Clone following Sequencing

A PAGE-based genotyping method for analyzing CRISPR/Cas9-related mutagenesis at the targets of bnarfl11 was used in the current study. This helped develop a highly efficient and straightforward mutational detection method (Figure S4). Although the time efficiency of the PAGE-based genotyping method is evident, there is still a limited use, such as small nucleotide indels or substitution replacements in homozygous mutant plants, which are very difficult to detect [46]. T0 validated the results of the PAGE screening, we used the high-throughput tracking of the T. A. clone. A total of 88 targeted mutant lines were identified in the T0 generation using Sanger sequencing. In both mutant lines, various mutations were detected, including inserting and deleting different nucleotides at the S1 and S2 target sites (Figure 4). Thus, the TA clone-based sequencing method for mutation detection is an efficient and straightforward method with a high mutation frequency. Seventeen mutant lines were selected out of 88 for further generation mutation analyses (Figure S4, Table S3).
For the successful use of B. napus, it is essential to recognize desirable allelic variations and candidate genes for male sterility and proper leaf growth for photosynthesis in China’s tri-annual crop rotation systems. Male sterility is a complex quantitative trait. Male sterility is induced only by mitochondrial ORFs when Rf, a nuclear gene, fails to diminish the ORF function. In the current study, BnaRFL11 triple and quadrable homozygous mutants had severe male sterility and an abnormal leaf phenotype (Figure 4, Figure 5a–f, Figure 8a–p and Figure 9a–d). CRISPR/Cas9 has not yet developed impulsive or induced male sterility mutants in B. napus.

4.3. BnaRFL11 Gene Plays an Essential Role in Fertility Restoration in B. napus

Rf genes are well known in Arabidopsis and other crops, as they restore male fertility. RFL is a class of PPR-encoding genes; RFL genes have functions similar to PPR in RNA modification, stabilization, and cleavage. Thus, RFL is a successful Rf candidate that could play a key role in fertility restoration. However, we still have limited knowledge of the RFL genes in other species, such as rapeseed. In a previous study, 53 BnaRFLs were identified, of which BnRFL13 (Rfp) and BnaRFL6 (Rfn) were found on chromosome A9 inside the gene cluster [29]. The first study on the loss of the RFL mutant in Arabidopsis showed that the AtRFL2 mutant had an abnormal phenotype [55].
RPF8 is an RFL-PPR protein [21,56]. A linkage study validated the involvement of the RFP8 protein in producing the −141 5′ ends of the nad3-rps12 mRNA in Van−0 [57]. The endonucleolytic cleavage of the mitochondrial gene orf291, which prevents transcript accumulation, is mediated by the Arabidopsis mitochondrial protein RFL2. PRORP1, a proteinaceous protein involved in mitochondrial RNA processing, facilitates this cleavage [48,58]. RPF8 and RFL2 from A. thaliana were similar to a single copy of BnaRFL11 (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
In the current study, all homozygous variations of the T0 and T1 lines were grown in the Hubei province to characterize the BnaRFL11 mutant phenotypes. Compared to wild-type plants, all transgenic lines showed a dramatic change in the floral structure with stable male sterility, as explained previously [59]. Microsporocytes and other locule features are uncommon, and all sites within CMS anthers rarely fail to form, as shown by nap CMS in rapeseed. Because of the disturbance of the anther development symmetry and the polarity of the developmental anomalies, the locules proximal to the carpel have a much greater risk of forming than locules distal to the carpel; as a result, they are among the additional and hyper sexualized features of the morphology of Brassica CMS. The cytological analysis (Figure 8) and expression analysis by qRT-PCR (Figure 10) of orf222/orf139/nad5c in sterile transgenic lines confirmed that the anther abortion stage is closely similar to the nap-CMS type. The dramatic rise in mitochondrial transcripts, particularly in anther tissues in CMS plants, also includes copies of the CMS-related gene orf222. The N-terminal encoding segment of orf222 is provided by atp8, which encodes a cellular ATP synthase moiety. As recommended by [60], by interfering with the function of its regular counterpart, the expression of a CMS-related gene product that mimics a regular mitochondrial product can cause mitochondrial damage. ATP8 is essential for ATP synthase aggregation. It is conceivable that in rapeseed CMS, a dysfunctional synthase array throughout phases of the successful mitochondrial function in sporogenous tissue causes oxidative damage that is severe enough to disrupt the average anther development [61]. AP3 and other B function genes regulate the identification and functional symmetry of the stamen and petals. According to our findings, an AP3 predictor array’s CMS activity timing differs from that of fertile stamens and petals.
As a result, the specific elements of CMS morphology that we examined here, comprising both stamen and petal modifications, may be caused by changes in the AP3 function. Our findings indicate that early in stamen growth, the cell-specific expression of orf222 prevents sporogenesis from starting at specific sites, resulting in sterile anthers. Since the Rfn gene failed to restore fertility, our findings suggest that this consequence could be regulated by orf222 activity on the output of the nuclear genes involved in anther processing, such as AP3.
Flowering plants have also developed a unique method for controlling organelle gene expression, in which post-transcriptional courses play a significant role in determining gene stoichiometry. The pentatricopeptide repeat function (PPR) proteins in plant RNA research have been among the most significant breakthroughs in the last few decades. Restorer of fertility (Rf) genes are nuclear loci suppressing CMS development. The Rf genes also encode pentatricopeptide repeat proteins. RFL genes have been implicated in the post-transcriptional alteration of mito-RNA in many studies. In Arabidopsis, pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein RNA processing factor8 (RPF8) and RFL2 are involved in the 5′ processing of various mitochondrial mRNAs. Both factors are similar to Rf, found in various plant species’ CMS/restoration systems. These results indicate that Rf-like PPR proteins play a crucial role in post-transcriptional 5′-processing. Collectively, the RFL gene family provides a new way to explore restorer genes in other CMS systems to complement traditional genetic mapping to locate the candidate genes. The mutants of BnaRFL11 developed in the current study might help researchers further investigate the molecular mechanism of RFL genes in fertility restoration and Mendelian inheritance in hybrid breeding (Figure 11).

5. Conclusions

The present study utilized the CRISPR/Cas9 system to knock out a single copy of the BnaRFL11 gene (BnaA09g45590D) to develop plants with male sterility in B. napus.
(1)
In a single copy of bnarfl11, heritable mutant plants develop different mutant lines with a constant mutation transmission in the T0 and T1 generations. Free T-DNA mutant lines were generated across two successive generations.
(2)
The phenotypic analysis of bnarfl11 revealed defects in the floral structure, leaf size, branch number, and seed production. The phenotypic analysis showed that the mutant plant lines had male sterility with multiple branches and a reduced leaf size compared to the W.T. plant lines.
(3)
To determine whether the off-target effect occurred in this study, we used the “CRISPR-P” software to identify a supposed off-target site in the rapeseed genome that is homologous to the two designed sgRNAs. The locations of potential off-target sites in the genome were noted. According to the sequencing (TA-Clone) of the PCR products, seven possible off-target sites from several T0 mutated plants showed no mutations.
(4)
The editing efficiency of the two sgRNAs of the bnarfl11 gene ranged from 0% to 65.10% in T0. We analyzed the editing efficiency of each sgRNA (S1–S2) that targets the bnarfl11 gene.
The current study’s findings suggest that CRISPR/Cas9 mutations may divulge the functions of genes in polyploid species and provide agronomically desirable traits through a targeted mutation.

6. Future Prospective

Future work can be conducted in the following ways.
(1)
To further identify the signaling pathway and molecular mechanism of BnaRFL11 in controlling other related genes involved in male sterility.
(2)
The development of markers for the polymorphic identification of variations in different mutation sites for CMS breeding in B. napus.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11243501/s1, Figure S1: Sequence alignment of BnaRFL11 with Arabidopsis homologs genes; Figure S2: Protein sequence alignment from B. napus (BnaA09g45590D) and A. thaliana (AT1G12300, AT1G12620); Figure S3: Sequence alignment of single functional RFL11 gene copy in Westar; Figure S4: Positive, Transgenic and mutation screening in bnarfl11; Figure S5: The BnaRFL11 gene contains a single copy with two target sites S1 and S2; Figure S6: Sequence alignment of BnaRFL11 with BnaRFL6; Table S1: The primer used in all studies; Table S2: Genotypical study of bnarfl11 transgenic plants and next-generation transmission analysis; Table S3: Molecular investigation of CRISPR/Cas9-tempted transmutations in bnarfl11 and it has spread to from T0 to T1 generations; Table S4: Exposure of off-effects for designed guiding-RNA in mutant lines; Table S5: Comparison of editing efficiency for BnaRFL11-promoters with other published gene-editing studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.F. and B.W.; methodology, Z.F. and M.N.R.; software, Z.F.; validation, H.W. and Y.L.; formal analysis, Z.F. and B.W.; investigation, Z.F. and M.S.F.; resources, J.T., B.Y., T.F., J.S., S.Y., C.M., J.W. and C.D.; data curation, Z.F.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.F. and M.N.R.; writing—review and editing, Z.F., M.S.F. and M.A.; visualization, Z.F. and B.W.; supervision, B.Y.; project administration, B.Y. and T.F.; funding acquisition, B.Y. and B.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China supported this project (Grant No. 32201883) and the Hubei Key Research Project of CRISPR Gene-Editing Technology in Fruit Vegetable Crops (2022BBA0062). Funding agencies had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, or interpretation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Materials).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xiang, N.T.; Barbetti, M.J.; Jacqueline, B. Current Status and Challenges in Identifying Disease Resistance Genes in Brassica napus. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1788. [Google Scholar]
  2. Van de Wouw, A.P.; Idnurm, A.; Davidson, J.A.; Sprague, S.J.; Khangura, R.K.; Ware, A.H.; Lindbeck, K.D.; Marcroft, S.J. Fungal diseases of canola in Australia: Identification of trends, threats and potential therapies. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2016, 45, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bharti, S.; Pedro, M.J.; Chrungu, K.B.; Aparajita, M. Chloroplast DNA Variations in Wild Brassicas and Their Implication in Breeding and Population Genetics Studies. Scientifica 2015, 2015, 952395. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yamagishi, H.; Bhat, S.R. Cytoplasmic male sterility in Brassicaceae crops. Breed. Sci. 2014, 64, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Yang, L.Y.; Liu, P.W.; Yang, G.S. Development of Polima temperature-sensitive cytoplasmic male sterile lines of Brassica napus through isolated microspore culture. Plant Breed. 2010, 125, 368–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hompson, K.F. Cytoplasmic male-sterility in oil-seed rape. Heredity 1972, 29, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ogura, H. Studies on the new male sterility in Japanese radish, with special references on the utilization of this sterility towards the practical raising of hybrid seeds. Mem. Fac. Agric. Kagoshima Univ. 1968, 6, 40–75. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hu, Q.; Hua, W.; Yin, Y.; Zhang, X.; Liu, L.; Shi, J.; Zhao, Y.; Qin, L.; Chen, C.; Wang, H. Rapeseed research and production in China. Crop J. 2017, 5, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Liu, J.; Li, M.; Wang, H.; Yu, L.; Li, D. Sequence analysis and expression of orf224 gene associated with two types of cytoplasmic male sterility in Brassica napus L. Z. Nat. C J. Biosci. 2010, 65, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Banga, S.S.; Labana, K.S.; Banga, S.K. Male sterility in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Coss.)—A biochemical characterization. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1984, 67, 515–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, J.; Xiang, R.; Wang, W.; Mei, D.; Li, Y.; Mason, A.S.; Fu, L.; Hu, Q. Cytological and molecular analysis of Nsa CMS in Brassica napus L. Euphytica 2015, 206, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Heng, S.; Wei, C.; Jing, B.; Wan, Z.; Wen, J.; Yi, B.; Ma, C.; Tu, J.; Fu, T.; Shen, J. Comparative analysis of mitochondrial genomes between the hau cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) line and its iso-nuclear maintainer line in Brassica juncea to reveal the origin of the CMS-associated gene orf288. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Hu, Q.; Andersen, S.; Dixelius, C.; Hansen, L. Production of fertile intergeneric somatic hybrids between Brassica napus and Sinapis arvensis for the enrichment of the rapeseed gene pool. Plant Cell Rep. 2002, 21, 147–152. [Google Scholar]
  14. Li, P.; Kang, L.; Wang, A.; Cui, C.; Li, Z. Development of a Fertility Restorer for inap CMS (Isatis indigotica) Brassica napus through Genetic Introgression of One Alien Addition. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Castandet, B.; Araya, A. The nucleocytoplasmic conflict, a driving force for the emergence of plant organellar RNA editing. IUBMB Life 2012, 64, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Barkan, A.; Small, I. Pentatricopeptide Repeat Proteins in Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2014, 65, 415–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bentolila, S.; Alfonso, A.A.; Hanson, M.R. A pentatricopeptide repeat-containing gene restores fertility to cytoplasmic male-sterile plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 10887–10892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Akagi, H.; Nakamura, A.; Yokozeki-Misono, Y.; Inagaki, A.; Takahashi, H.; Mori, K.; Fujimura, T. Positional cloning of the rice Rf-1 gene, a restorer of BT-type cytoplasmic male sterility that encodes a mitochondria-targeting PPR protein. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2004, 108, 1449–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fujii, S.; Kazama, T.; Ito, Y.; Kojima, S.; Toriyama, K. A candidate factor that interacts with RF2, a restorer of fertility of Lead rice-type cytoplasmic male sterility in rice. Rice 2014, 7, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Brown, G.G.; Formanová, N.; Jin, H.; Wargachuk, R.; Dendy, C.; Patil, P.; Laforest, M.; Zhang, J.; Cheung, W.Y.; Landry, B.S. The radish Rfo restorer gene of Ogura cytoplasmic male sterility encodes a protein with multiple pentatricopeptide repeats. Plant J. 2003, 35, 262–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Desloire, S.; Gherbi, H.; Laloui, W.; Marhadour, S.; Clouet, V.; Cattolico, L.; Falentin, C.; Giancola, S.; Renard, M.; Budar, F. Identification of the fertility restoration locus, Rfo, in radish, as a member of the pentatricopeptide-repeat protein family. EMBO Rep. 2003, 4, 588–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Klein, R.; Klein, P.; Mullet, J.; Minx, P.; Rooney, W.; Schertz, K. Fertility restorer locus Rf1 of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) encodes a pentatricopeptide repeat protein not present in the colinear region of rice chromosome 12. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2005, 111, 994–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Heng, S.; Chen, F.; Wei, C.; Hu, K.; Yang, Z.; Wen, J.; Yi, B.; Ma, C.; Tu, J.; Si, P.; et al. identification of different cytoplasms based on newly developed mitotype-specific markers for marker-assisted selection breeding in Brassica napus L. Plant Cell Rep. 2017, 36, 901–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kim, Y.J.; Zhang, D. Molecular Control of Male Fertility for Crop Hybrid Breeding. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pahwa, R.; Banga, S.; Gogna, K.; Banga, S. Tournefortii male sterility system in Brassica napus. Identification, expression and genetic characterization of male fertility restorers. Plant Breed. 2004, 123, 444–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kang, L.; Li, P.; Wang, A.; Ge, X.; Li, Z. A Novel Cytoplasmic Male Sterility in Brassica napus (inap CMS) with Carpelloid Stamens via Protoplast Fusion with Chinese Woad. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Iwabuchi, M.; Koizuka, N.; Fujimoto, H.; Sakai, T.; Imamura, J. Identification and expression of the kosena radish (Raphanus sativus cv. Kosena) homologue of the ogura radish CMS-associated gene, orf138. Plant Mol. Biol. 1999, 39, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sang, S.-F.; Mei, D.-S.; Liu, J.; Zaman, Q.U.; Zhang, H.-Y.; Hao, M.-Y.; Fu, L.; Wang, H.; Cheng, H.-T.; Hu, Q. Organelle genome composition and candidate gene Identification for Nsa cytoplasmic male sterility in Brassica napus. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ning, L.; Wang, H.; Li, D.; Li, Y.; Chen, K.; Chao, H.; Li, H.; He, J.; Li, M. Genome-wide identification of the restorer-of-fertility-like (RFL) gene family in Brassica napus and expression analysis in Shaan2A cytoplasmic male sterility. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Melonek, J.; Stone, J.D.; Small, I. Evolutionary plasticity of restorer-of-fertility-like proteins in rice. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sykes, T.; Yates, S.; Nagy, I.; Asp, T.; Small, I.; Studer, B. In silico identification of candidate genes for fertility restoration in cytoplasmic male sterile perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Genome Biol. Evol. 2017, 9, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Kazama, T.; Nakamura, T.; Watanabe, M.; Sugita, M.; Toriyama, K. Suppression mechanism of mitochondrial ORF79 accumulation by Rf1 protein in BT-type cytoplasmic male sterile rice. Plant J. 2008, 55, 619–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Uyttewaal, M.; Arnal, N.; Quadrado, M.; Martin-Canadell, A.; Vrielynck, N.; Hiard, S.; Gherbi, H.; Bendahmane, A.; Budar, F.; Mireau, H. Characterization of Raphanus sativus pentatricopeptide repeat proteins encoded by the fertility restorer locus for Ogura cytoplasmic male sterility. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 3331–3345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Barr, C.M.; Fishman, L. The nuclear component of a cytonuclear hybrid incompatibility in Mimulus maps to a cluster of pentatricopeptide repeat genes. Genetics 2010, 184, 455–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fujii, S.; Yamada, M.; Fujita, M.; Itabashi, E.; Hamada, K.; Yano, K.; Kurata, N.; Toriyama, K. Cytoplasmic–nuclear genomic barriers in rice pollen development revealed by comparison of global gene expression profiles among five independent cytoplasmic male sterile lines. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51, 610–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Luo, D.; Xu, H.; Liu, Z.; Guo, J.; Li, H.; Chen, L.; Fang, C.; Zhang, Q.; Bai, M.; Yao, N. A detrimental mitochondrial-nuclear interaction causes cytoplasmic male sterility in rice. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 573–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Meyer, J.; Pei, D.; Wise, R.P. Rf8-mediated T-urf13 transcript accumulation coincides with a pentatricopeptide repeat cluster on maize chromosome 2L. Plant Genome 2011, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, Z.; Yang, Z.; Wang, X.; Li, K.; An, H.; Liu, J.; Yang, G.; Fu, T.; Yi, B.; Hong, D. A Mitochondria-Targeted PPR Protein Restores pol Cytoplasmic Male Sterility by Reducing orf224 Transcript Levels in Oilseed Rape. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 1082–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Liu, X.-Q.; Liu, Z.-Q.; Yu, C.-Y.; Dong, J.-G.; Hu, S.-W.; Xu, A.-X. TGMS in rapeseed (Brassica napus) resulted in aberrant transcriptional regulation, asynchronous microsporocyte meiosis, defective tapetum, and fused sexine. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Zhai, Y.; Yu, K.; Cai, S.; Hu, L.; Amoo, O.; Xu, L.; Yang, Y.; Ma, B.; Jiao, Y.; Zhang, C. Targeted mutagenesis of BnTT8 homologs controls yellow seed coat development for effective oil production in Brassica napus L. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 1153–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Bailey, T.L.; Boden, M.; Buske, F.A.; Frith, M.; Grant, C.E.; Clementi, L.; Ren, J.; Li, W.W.; Noble, W.S. MEME SUITE: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, W202–W208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Liu, H.; Ding, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Jin, W.; Xie, K.; Chen, L.L. CRISPR-P 2.0: An improved CRISPR-Cas9 tool for genome editing in plants. Mol. Plant 2017, 10, 530–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Hsu, P.D.; Scott, D.A.; Weinstein, J.A.; Ran, F.; Konermann, S.; Agarwala, V.; Li, Y.; Fine, E.J.; Wu, X.; Shalem, O. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 827–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Xing, H.-L.; Dong, L.; Wang, Z.-P.; Zhang, H.-Y.; Han, C.-Y.; Liu, B.; Wang, X.-C.; Chen, Q.-J. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhou, Y.; Wang, H.; Gilmer, S.; Whitwill, S.; Keller, W.; Fowke, L. Control of petal and pollen development by the plant cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor ICK1 in transgenic Brassica plants. Planta 2002, 215, 248–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhu, X.; Xu, Y.; Yu, S.; Lu, L.; Ding, M.; Cheng, J.; Song, G.; Gao, X.; Yao, L.; Fan, D. An efficient genotyping method for genome-modified animals and human cells generated with CRISPR/Cas9 system. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Peng, Y.; Shi, D.; Zhang, T.; Li, X.; Fu, T.; Xu, Y.; Wan, Z. Development and utilization of an efficient cytoplasmic male sterile system for Cai-xin (Brassica rapa L.). Sci. Hortic. 2015, 190, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fujii, S.; Suzuki, T.; Giegé, P.; Higashiyama, T.; Koizuka, N.; Shikanai, T. The Restorer-of-fertility-like 2 pentatricopeptide repeat protein and R.N. ase P are required for the processing of mitochondrial orf291 RNA in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2016, 86, 504–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Bohra, A.; Jha, U.C.; Adhimoolam, P.; Bisht, D.; Singh, N.P. Cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) in hybrid breeding in field crops. Plant Cell Rep. 2016, 35, 967–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lei, Y.; Lu, L.; Liu, H.-Y.; Li, S.; Xing, F.; Chen, L.-L. CRISPR-P: A web tool for synthetic single-guide RNA design of CRISPR-system in plants. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 1494–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Hussain, B.; Lucas, S.J.; Budak, H. CRISPR/Cas9 in plants: At play in the genome and at work for crop improvement. Brief. Funct. Genom. 2018, 17, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Sander, J.D.; Joung, J.K. CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ma, X.; Zhang, Q.; Zhu, Q.; Liu, W.; Chen, Y.; Qiu, R.; Wang, B.; Yang, Z.; Li, H.; Lin, Y. A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 1274–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yang, Y.; Zhu, K.; Li, H.; Han, S.; Meng, Q.; Khan, S.U.; Fan, C.; Xie, K.; Zhou, Y. Precise editing of CLAVATA genes in Brassica napus L. regulates multilocular silique development. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 1322–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Jonietz, C.; Forner, J.; Hildebrandt, T.; Binder, S. RNA PROCESSING FACTOR3 is crucial for the accumulation of mature ccmC transcripts in mitochondria of Arabidopsis accession Columbia. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 1430–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Fujii, S.; Bond, C.S.; Small, I.D. Selection patterns on restorer-like genes reveal a conflict between nuclear and mitochondrial genomes throughout angiosperm evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 1723–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Schleicher, S.; Binder, S. In Arabidopsis thaliana mitochondria 5’ end polymorphisms of nad4L-atp4 and nad3-rps12 transcripts are linked to RNA PROCESSING FACTORs 1 and 8. Plant Mol. Biol. 2021, 106, 335–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gutmann, B.; Gobert, A.; Giegé, P. PRORP proteins support RNase P activity in both organelles and the nucleus in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2012, 26, 1022–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Geddy, R.; Mahé, L.; Brown, G.G. Cell-specific regulation of a Brassica napus CMS-associated gene by a nuclear restorer with related effects on a floral homeotic gene promoter. Plant J. 2005, 41, 333–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sabar, M.; Gagliardi, D.; Balk, J.; Leaver, C.J. ORFB is a subunit of F1 FO-ATP synthase: Insight into the basis of cytoplasmic male sterility in sunflower. EMBO Rep. 2003, 4, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Devenish, R.J.; Prescott, M.; Roucou, X.; Nagley, P. Insights into ATP synthase assembly and function through the molecular genetic manipulation of subunits of the yeast mitochondrial enzyme complex. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA) Bioenerg. 2000, 1458, 428–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conserved motif analysis and phylogenetic relationship of BnaRFL11 with other gene species. (a) Phylogenetic tree showing an association between BnaRFL11 and its sister genes in Arabidopsis. Protein sequences were obtained from the GenBank with the following gene ID: BnaA09g45590D, AT1G12300, and AT1G12620. (b) Presence of similar motifs between sequences. (c,d) The conserved motifs among BnaRFL11, known fertility restore genes Rfn and Rfp, and Arabidopsis thaliana sister genes.
Figure 1. Conserved motif analysis and phylogenetic relationship of BnaRFL11 with other gene species. (a) Phylogenetic tree showing an association between BnaRFL11 and its sister genes in Arabidopsis. Protein sequences were obtained from the GenBank with the following gene ID: BnaA09g45590D, AT1G12300, and AT1G12620. (b) Presence of similar motifs between sequences. (c,d) The conserved motifs among BnaRFL11, known fertility restore genes Rfn and Rfp, and Arabidopsis thaliana sister genes.
Plants 11 03501 g001
Figure 2. Model of BnaRFL11 with target sequences and the binary plasmid Cas9 vector. (a) The BnaRFL11 gene structure is shown in black. The vertical line indicates the gene model, and the arrow shows the sgRNA direction. The target sequences of sgRNAs are represented by PAM sites highlighted in red. (b) The kanamycin resistance cassette is driven by the CaMV35S promoter of the cauliflower mosaic virus. Two sgRNAs are driven by the U6-26p and U6-29p promoters and the U6-26t terminator.
Figure 2. Model of BnaRFL11 with target sequences and the binary plasmid Cas9 vector. (a) The BnaRFL11 gene structure is shown in black. The vertical line indicates the gene model, and the arrow shows the sgRNA direction. The target sequences of sgRNAs are represented by PAM sites highlighted in red. (b) The kanamycin resistance cassette is driven by the CaMV35S promoter of the cauliflower mosaic virus. Two sgRNAs are driven by the U6-26p and U6-29p promoters and the U6-26t terminator.
Plants 11 03501 g002
Figure 3. Different stages of the tissue culture process for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in rapeseed. (a) Sowing of wild-type Westar seeds on the seedling medium (M0). (b) Growth of plants on seedling medium after 6–7 days. (c) Spreading of hypocotyls for 48 h in the dark on (M1) media. (d) After 48 h, transfer explants were transferred to (M2) media and placed in a growth room for 15–20 days. (e) After 15–20 days, explants were on (M3) media for callus induction until the plants were regenerated. (f) Regenerated plants were transferred into (M4) rooting media to obtain better roots. (g) After obtaining roots, transgenic plants were transferred into pots under controlled conditions for their survival. (h) Transgenic plants were transferred to the field under normal conditions after survival. Bar = 4 cm.
Figure 3. Different stages of the tissue culture process for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in rapeseed. (a) Sowing of wild-type Westar seeds on the seedling medium (M0). (b) Growth of plants on seedling medium after 6–7 days. (c) Spreading of hypocotyls for 48 h in the dark on (M1) media. (d) After 48 h, transfer explants were transferred to (M2) media and placed in a growth room for 15–20 days. (e) After 15–20 days, explants were on (M3) media for callus induction until the plants were regenerated. (f) Regenerated plants were transferred into (M4) rooting media to obtain better roots. (g) After obtaining roots, transgenic plants were transferred into pots under controlled conditions for their survival. (h) Transgenic plants were transferred to the field under normal conditions after survival. Bar = 4 cm.
Plants 11 03501 g003
Figure 4. Mutation transmission from T0 to T1 generations. At both target sites in bnarfl11 mutant plants. Red font and red hyphens signify CRISPR-based alterations, whereas PAM is underlined and highlighted in red. The altered alleles of RFL11 on chromosome A were expressed as aa09. “−” and “+” signify losses.
Figure 4. Mutation transmission from T0 to T1 generations. At both target sites in bnarfl11 mutant plants. Red font and red hyphens signify CRISPR-based alterations, whereas PAM is underlined and highlighted in red. The altered alleles of RFL11 on chromosome A were expressed as aa09. “−” and “+” signify losses.
Plants 11 03501 g004
Figure 5. Phenotypic analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 mutated bnarfl11 plants. (a,b) Shows wild type with normal flower development. (c,d) Shows bnarfl11 flower.
Figure 5. Phenotypic analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 mutated bnarfl11 plants. (a,b) Shows wild type with normal flower development. (c,d) Shows bnarfl11 flower.
Plants 11 03501 g005
Figure 6. Pollen viability test staining with 1% (w/v) acetocarmine solution. (a) Shows WT pollens. (b) Arrows indicating bnarfl11 degenerated pollens.
Figure 6. Pollen viability test staining with 1% (w/v) acetocarmine solution. (a) Shows WT pollens. (b) Arrows indicating bnarfl11 degenerated pollens.
Plants 11 03501 g006
Figure 7. Plant growth stages of bnarfl11 compared to W.T. (a) Male-sterile plant at the close flower stage. (b) Male-sterile plant at the open-flower stage. (c) Male-sterile plants after crossing with the wild type with significantly fewer seeds. (df) Wild-type growth stages compared with those of bnarfl11.
Figure 7. Plant growth stages of bnarfl11 compared to W.T. (a) Male-sterile plant at the close flower stage. (b) Male-sterile plant at the open-flower stage. (c) Male-sterile plants after crossing with the wild type with significantly fewer seeds. (df) Wild-type growth stages compared with those of bnarfl11.
Plants 11 03501 g007
Figure 8. Cytological analysis of bnarfl11 (ip) compared to the wild type (ah). There is no significant difference at early stages (a,b,i,j), but at later stages (c,d,k,l), the loss of one or two locules per anther is evident. In (l), MMCs are intermittently formed with an intact tapetum in the locks compared to W.T. Ar, archesporial cell; E, epidermis; PSC, primary sporogenous cell; MMC, microspore mother cells; S.P., sporogenous cell; En, endothecium; SPC, secondary parietal cell; ML, middle layer; T, tapetum; V, vascular region; PPC, primary parietal cell Bar = 10 μm. Cytological analysis of bnarfl11 compared to the wild type. (eh) Stages of the wild type from 5–8. (mp) displays the stages of the sterile flower from 5–8. (m) The Meiocyte stage with a highly dense callose wall around them and vacuolation in the tapetum was more confirmed than W.T. (e,n) At the tetrad stage, clumps of dense tissue in CMS locules, while in W.T. (f) locules and MC are typical. (o) At the pre-dehiscent stage, the locule increases in size, microspores form a cell clump, and the tapetum starts degrading; however, in W.T. (g), they have four large locules and normal microspores. (p) Degenerated pollen grains in the CMS flowers. (h) Normal pollen grains. T, tapetum; MC, meiotic cell; E, epidermis; St, stomium; Msp, microspores; S.P., sporogenous cell; Tds, tetrads; V, vascular region; P.G., pollen grain; DGP, degenerated pollen grains Bar = 10 μm.
Figure 8. Cytological analysis of bnarfl11 (ip) compared to the wild type (ah). There is no significant difference at early stages (a,b,i,j), but at later stages (c,d,k,l), the loss of one or two locules per anther is evident. In (l), MMCs are intermittently formed with an intact tapetum in the locks compared to W.T. Ar, archesporial cell; E, epidermis; PSC, primary sporogenous cell; MMC, microspore mother cells; S.P., sporogenous cell; En, endothecium; SPC, secondary parietal cell; ML, middle layer; T, tapetum; V, vascular region; PPC, primary parietal cell Bar = 10 μm. Cytological analysis of bnarfl11 compared to the wild type. (eh) Stages of the wild type from 5–8. (mp) displays the stages of the sterile flower from 5–8. (m) The Meiocyte stage with a highly dense callose wall around them and vacuolation in the tapetum was more confirmed than W.T. (e,n) At the tetrad stage, clumps of dense tissue in CMS locules, while in W.T. (f) locules and MC are typical. (o) At the pre-dehiscent stage, the locule increases in size, microspores form a cell clump, and the tapetum starts degrading; however, in W.T. (g), they have four large locules and normal microspores. (p) Degenerated pollen grains in the CMS flowers. (h) Normal pollen grains. T, tapetum; MC, meiotic cell; E, epidermis; St, stomium; Msp, microspores; S.P., sporogenous cell; Tds, tetrads; V, vascular region; P.G., pollen grain; DGP, degenerated pollen grains Bar = 10 μm.
Plants 11 03501 g008aPlants 11 03501 g008b
Figure 9. Dehiscence stage of bnarfl11 compared with W.T. (a,b) bnarfl11 dehiscence stage. (a) Heap of scarring in exine (Ex) if four locks succeed in development. (b) The loss of adaxial or abaxial locules is evident in the bnarfl11. (c,d) Wild-type flowers at dehiscence, with four locules and normal mature pollen grains. Bar = 10 μm.
Figure 9. Dehiscence stage of bnarfl11 compared with W.T. (a,b) bnarfl11 dehiscence stage. (a) Heap of scarring in exine (Ex) if four locks succeed in development. (b) The loss of adaxial or abaxial locules is evident in the bnarfl11. (c,d) Wild-type flowers at dehiscence, with four locules and normal mature pollen grains. Bar = 10 μm.
Plants 11 03501 g009
Figure 10. RT-PCR and qRT-PCR of bnarfl11 plants. (a) RT-PCR analysis of nap-CMS cytoplasm in bnarfl11 plants. For RT-PCR, total DNA was extracted from the Cas9 transgenic line, and the W.T. leaves. (bf) qRT-PCR analysis of CMS-causing genes in bnarfl11 plants. For qRT-PCR analysis, total RNA was extracted from leaves, stems, buds, and petals of the Cas9 transgenic line. Values represent the mean and standard deviation. Error bars indicate the standard deviation among triplicate experiments.
Figure 10. RT-PCR and qRT-PCR of bnarfl11 plants. (a) RT-PCR analysis of nap-CMS cytoplasm in bnarfl11 plants. For RT-PCR, total DNA was extracted from the Cas9 transgenic line, and the W.T. leaves. (bf) qRT-PCR analysis of CMS-causing genes in bnarfl11 plants. For qRT-PCR analysis, total RNA was extracted from leaves, stems, buds, and petals of the Cas9 transgenic line. Values represent the mean and standard deviation. Error bars indicate the standard deviation among triplicate experiments.
Plants 11 03501 g010
Figure 11. Putative model for male sterility in the current study on rapeseed. Red arrow indicating upregulation.
Figure 11. Putative model for male sterility in the current study on rapeseed. Red arrow indicating upregulation.
Plants 11 03501 g011
Table 1. Statistical results for the bnarfl11 transgenic generations.
Table 1. Statistical results for the bnarfl11 transgenic generations.
Target GeneNumber of TargetsGenerationTransgene Rate (%)Positive Rate (%)
BnaRFL112T081% (88/108)89% (97/108)
2T175% (110/145)90% (131/145)
Numbers in brackets indicate the number of mutated plants divided by the total number of plants developed.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Farooq, Z.; Nouman Riaz, M.; Farooq, M.S.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Ahmad, M.; Tu, J.; Ma, C.; Dai, C.; Wen, J.; et al. Induction of Male Sterility by Targeted Mutation of a Restorer-of-Fertility Gene with CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Brassica napus L. Plants 2022, 11, 3501. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243501

AMA Style

Farooq Z, Nouman Riaz M, Farooq MS, Li Y, Wang H, Ahmad M, Tu J, Ma C, Dai C, Wen J, et al. Induction of Male Sterility by Targeted Mutation of a Restorer-of-Fertility Gene with CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Brassica napus L. Plants. 2022; 11(24):3501. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243501

Chicago/Turabian Style

Farooq, Zunaira, Muhammad Nouman Riaz, Muhammad Shoaib Farooq, Yifan Li, Huadong Wang, Mayra Ahmad, Jinxing Tu, Chaozhi Ma, Cheng Dai, Jing Wen, and et al. 2022. "Induction of Male Sterility by Targeted Mutation of a Restorer-of-Fertility Gene with CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Brassica napus L." Plants 11, no. 24: 3501. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243501

APA Style

Farooq, Z., Nouman Riaz, M., Farooq, M. S., Li, Y., Wang, H., Ahmad, M., Tu, J., Ma, C., Dai, C., Wen, J., Shen, J., Fu, T., Yang, S., Wang, B., & Yi, B. (2022). Induction of Male Sterility by Targeted Mutation of a Restorer-of-Fertility Gene with CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Brassica napus L. Plants, 11(24), 3501. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243501

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop