Next Article in Journal
Molecular Characterization, Evolutionary Analysis, and Expression Profiling of BOR Genes in Important Cereals
Next Article in Special Issue
Silver Nanoparticle Effects on Antioxidant Response in Tobacco Are Modulated by Surface Coating
Previous Article in Journal
Extracellular Vesicle-Mediated Secretion of Protochlorophyllide in the Cyanobacterium Leptolyngbya boryana
Previous Article in Special Issue
Carbon-Based Nanomaterials for Sustainable Agriculture: Their Application as Light Converters, Nanosensors, and Delivery Tools
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 7
10.3390/plants11070912
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CuO-NPs Improve Biosynthesis of Bioactive Compounds in Lettuce

by
Jazmín M. Gaucin-Delgado
1,
Adriel Ortiz-Campos
1,
Luis G. Hernandez-Montiel
2,*,
Manuel Fortis-Hernandez
1,
Juan J. Reyes-Pérez
3,
José A. Gonzáles-Fuentes
4 and
Pablo Preciado-Rangel
1,*
1
Tecnológico Nacional de Mexico, Instituto Tecnológico de Torreón, Carretera Torreón-San Pedro km 7.5, Torreón 27170, Mexico
2
Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, Av. Politécnico Nacional 195, Col. Playa Palo Santa Rita, La Paz 23090, Mexico
3
Facultad de Ciencias Pecuarias, Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo, Av. Quito km 1.5 vía a Santo Domingo, Quevedo 120501, Ecuador
4
Horticulture Department, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Calzada Antonio Narro 1923, Buenavista, Saltillo 25315, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(7), 912; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070912
Submission received: 21 February 2022 / Revised: 21 March 2022 / Accepted: 24 March 2022 / Published: 29 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of Nanomaterials on Plant Growth, Development and Metabolism)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The application of metallic nanoparticles improves the yield and content of bioactive compounds in plants. The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of the foliar application of copper nanoparticles (CuO-NPs) in the yield and content of bioactive compounds in lettuce. Different concentrations of CuO-NPs (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 mg mL−1) were applied in lettuce. The yield, nutraceutical quality, and enzymatic activity were determined. Foliar spraying of CuO-NPs induced an increase in the biosynthesis of bioactive compounds. In addition to an increase in the activity of the enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) in lettuce plants, there were no negative effects on yield. Therefore, with the application of CuO-NPs, better quality lettuces are produced for the human diet due to the higher production of bioactive compounds.

1. Introduction

The use of nanoproducts is innovating agriculture by reducing environmental impact and increasing the yield in the plants [1]. Among the main nanoproducts are metallic nanoparticles (NPs), which can induce faster seed germination [2] and increase tolerance in the plants to biotic or abiotic stress, favoring efficient management of nutrients and plant growth [3]. In addition, it improves the yield and the content of bioactive compounds in foods of plant origin [4], which help prevent chronic and degenerative diseases, generating positive effects that allow promoting and restoring the physiological functions of the human organism [5]. In particular, the NPs based on copper (Cu) have attracted attention for agri-food purposes due to their diverse characteristics and polyvalent properties [6]. CuO-NPs have antimicrobial and antiviral properties [7], and they are also a nutritional source [8,9].
Cu is an important element in plants as it regulates various physiological and biochemical processes such as photosynthesis, respiration, carbon and nitrogen metabolism, as well as the protection against oxidative stress, among others [10]. The appropriate range of Cu in most plant species varies in low levels between 3 and 20 ppm [11], which is necessary for the development of plants [12] since most plants have a low capacity to absorb large amounts of Cu [13]. In addition, it has been reported that the copper supplied to lettuce showed tolerance to copper toxicity in concentrations of (400 μM), by altering the absorption of mineral nutrients, enzymatic activity, chlorophyll content, and leaf expansion [14]. Cu is essential for humans; however, Cu deficiency and/or excess negatively affect human health [15]. Cu deficiency leads to serious disorders such as anemia and neutropenia [10], while in excess it produces liver disorders and diseases such as Alzheimer’s, as well as nerve collapse [16,17]. Additionally, an excessive application of metallic NPs on the plants produces stress and/or toxicity, generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) and a cellular metabolism disorder. In this condition, the plants increase the content of antioxidant enzymes and non-enzymatic components for cellular protection [18], these include glutathione, vitamin C, carotenoids, ascorbate peroxidase (APX), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT), among others [19].
Moreover, lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) is one of the most consumed and cultivated green leafy vegetables worldwide [20]. It also has organoleptic characteristics that benefit human health and biofunctional properties related to phenolic compounds, flavonoids, vitamin C, A, E, B, potassium, magnesium, iron, calcium, and phosphorus [21]. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the effect of the foliar application of CuO-NPs on the accumulation of bioactive compounds in lettuce.

2. Results

2.1. CuO-NPs Effects on the Growth and Yield of Lettuce

The foliar application of CuO-NPs did not affect the yield and its components (Table 1); however, the greater number of leaves and weight per lettuce was positively affected in those treated with the dose of 6 mg mL−1.

2.2. Nutraceutical Quality

The foliar spray of CuO-NPs positively modified the biosynthesis of phytochemical compounds such as the content of total phenols, flavonoids, antioxidant capacity, and chlorophyll (Figure 1a–c). The CuO-NPs positively affected the chlorophyll content in lettuce leaves (Figure 1d), inducing an increase in these pigments, the high doses increased the total chlorophyll content by 47% (Figure 1d).

2.3. Enzymatic Activity

The CuO-NPs increased the enzymatic activity (Figure 2a,b) at 125% for glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and 135% for superoxide dismutase (SOD). Cu content in the leaves of lettuce increased as the sprayed doses increased (Figure 2c).

3. Discussion

The response of the crop to the application of CuO-NPs depends on the applied concentration [22]; since at low doses yield is promoted and high doses reduce it due to phytotoxicity [23], similar results are reported by Olkhovych et al. [24], when reporting that high doses of CuO-NPs reduce the yield of the crops, due to the fact that it increases the production of free radicals causing oxidative stress [25], and low doses improve the yield since they avoid cellular oxidation by increasing the capacity of plants to resist oxidative stress caused by reactive oxygen species under stress conditions [26]. In addition to positively affecting growth and yield, they also improve the synthesis of antioxidant compounds [27]. Another additional advantage of biosynthesized CuO-NPs is that they are less toxic than free NPs and copper sulfate [28] since bio fabricated CuO-NPs do not generate polluting by-products [29].
NPs can increase the survival of plants through many mechanisms such as improving the antioxidant defense system, increasing the absorption of water, nutrients, and phytohormones, among others [30]. Hasan et al. [31] reported that Ag-NPs increased the chlorophyll content of lettuce leaves by stabilizing the photosynthetic function; this was due to the optimal penetration into the leaf tissue. Zhao et al., [32] reported that the application of CuO-NPs increased the content of photosynthetic pigments in cucumber leaves, which was reflected in increased photosynthesis. This increase in chlorophyll content is probably due to the protection provided by metallic NPs, which may be caused by antioxidant agents in the chloroplast membrane [33]. This response depends on the dose used since CuO-NPs can induce negative responses at certain doses, while in others they can induce the opposite effect or simply have no effect [1]. This behavior, called hormesis, has been reported when metallic NPs are applied as biostimulants in cultures [34].
The beneficial effects on lettuce by CuO-NPs can be attributed to its modification in the photosynthesis system of plants with a higher transpiration rate and higher stomatal conductance [3,35]. The results indicate that CuO-NPs can be used as an agent that increases these photosynthetic compounds, which benefits the plant by participating as a coenzyme in enzyme systems involved in the formation [13] and conversion of amino acids, as well as in the detoxification of superoxide radicals. In addition, this allows them to form lignin in the cell walls [36], providing support to the vertical position in the plants, likewise, this allows them to interact in the formation of viable pollen, seed formation, and resistance to stress [37]. The vitamin C in lettuce was not affected by the concentrations of CuO-NPs used; however, the highest concentration of vitamin C corresponded to those lettuces treated with 6 mg mL−1 of CuO-NPs, this concentration is 53% higher than the control treatment. This study showed that CuO-NPs increased the amount of vitamin C in lettuce leaves; this could be due to the efficient stimulation of NPs in the photosynthetic apparatus by protecting it from high radiation in the light-harvesting complexes (xanthophyll cycle) [38].
Vitamin C directly influences photosynthesis because it is present in the chloroplasts, cytosol, vacuoles, and apoplastic space. In addition, it participates as an enzymatic cofactor, homeostasis of the redox system, as a precursor in the routes of synthesis of molecules of primary and secondary metabolism [39]. Likewise, green vegetables provide a greater or lesser amount of lutein and/or xanthophylls that, when in contact with vitamin C, intervene in a defense mechanism to protect photosynthesis (and therefore the chloroplast) that allows the elimination of excess energy in the form of heat safety [40]. The action of this cycle prevents the formation of O2 avoiding oxidative damage. It participates in the defense against biotic and abiotic oxidative stress due to its function in the degradation of H2O2 via the glutathione-ascorbate cycle [41]. López-Vargas et al. [20] indicated that applications of 250 mg L−1 CuO-NPs increase vitamin C, which increased the nutraceutical quality of fruits. Hernández-Hernández et al. [1] state that copper participates in the activation of enzymes, in the process of photosynthesis, the respiration of plants, and an adjuvant to these in the metabolism of carbohydrates and proteins. Vitamin C, being the most abundant antioxidant in plants, is used as a cofactor of redox enzymes due to its donation of electrons that participate in the reduction of oxidative stress in human diseases such as cancer.
Copper acts as catalytic centers for proteins in plant cell metabolism [42] and regulates the activities of enzymes such as GPX, SOD, CAT, among others, which are important scavengers of reactive oxygen species since they form the first line of defense against oxidative stress [43]. In other studies, it was shown that CuO-NPs increase CAT activity in tomato leaves [44]. Furthermore, CuO-NPs increase the activity of antioxidant enzymes such as ascorbate peroxidase (APX), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GPX) [45], since these enzymes help to reduce oxidative stress [46]. On the other hand, it has been shown that the application of Cu-NPs at low concentrations (20 to 40 mg L−1) increase the enzymatic activity of SOD, CAT, and GPX in tomato leaves [20], rice [47], bell pepper [48] and lettuce [49]. Therefore, CuO-NPs improve the enzymatic antioxidant system of lettuce plants. In addition, CuO-NPs increase the content of PAL enzymes in plants, which act as inhibitors of the formation of singlet oxygen and free radical scavengers [50].
The use of 6.0 mg mL−1 favored an accumulation of this element in lettuce leaves, in direct weighting to its application. This accumulation agrees with [51], who point out that CuO-NPs increase 18.86% of the copper content in wheat grains. Similar results are also reported by Shams et al. [15], increasing the Cu content in the lettuce crop by 35%. Presumably, the constant exposure of the plant to sprays with CuO-NPs accumulated Cu in the leaves [30], thanks to the COPT1 transporter that allows the entry of Cu into the cell, which allows it to interact with the plant’s cellular metabolism [52], participating in numerous physiological processes in addition to being an essential cofactor for many metalloproteins that help in the process of photosynthesis and repair, allowing a greater translocation of this element by the plant [25]. Although the Cu concentration increased in lettuce leaves by foliar spraying of CuO-NPs, it remained safe for consumption, since between 1 and 3 mg of copper per day is required to prevent any symptoms of deficiency [53], therefore the highest dose used in the present experiment is safe to use, providing the recommended average amount in the daily intake (1200 μg day−1). In this sense, the use of CuO-NPs is an effective way to enrich crops, since transferring Cu to plant tissues will cause an accumulation of this micronutrient, which could help to solve Cu deficiency in the human diet [54].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Growing Conditions

The study was carried out in a greenhouse at the Instituto Tecnologico de Torreon, Coahuila, México, located at 24°30′ north latitude, 102°00′ west longitude and at 1120 m.a.s.l. Lettuce seed (Lactuca sativa L.) cv. Parris Island (Huertas®, La Huerta, México) were used, which were germinated in agricultural foam plates. Twenty days after sowing, the seedlings were transplanted into 5 kg capacity black polyethylene plastic pots containing river sand and perlite (v/v, 80:20) as growing medium previously sterilized with 5% sodium hypochlorite. The pots were distributed in double rows where a density of four plants per square meter was obtained. For crop nutrition, a Steiner nutrient solution [55] was used and applied through a drip irrigation system, providing three irrigations per day. Each plant received 0.200 L in each irrigation event, from transplantation to vegetative stage and from 1 to 1.5 L until harvest. The average temperature was 20 ± 5 °C, and the relative humidity was 40 ± 5%.

4.2. CuO-NPs

The CuO-NPs were donated by the Centro de Investigación en Química Aplicada (CIQA), Saltillo, Coahuila, México. The nanoparticle size was 95 nm, hemispherical morphology, dark-looking black-brown powder, with a purity of 99.8%, and they were obtained by green synthesis [56].

4.3. CuO-NPs Application

The evaluated treatments consisted of foliar application of CuO-NPs using the following concentrations: 0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4 and 6 mg mL−1 [57]. The method to prepare the different doses was using a stock solution of CuO-NPs. Subsequently, the five doses of nanoparticles were prepared in a one-liter volumetric flask, each of the nanoparticle concentrations was poured separately and completed with distilled water. The solutions were placed in manual sprayers with a capacity of 100 mL−1, and the different nanoparticle treatments were applied via foliar spraying during the first hours of the morning, spraying was carried out every fifteen days after transplantation (DAT).

4.4. Sampling

Ten plants were sampled per treatment. At 60 DAT, they were measured and weighed to determine: yield, number of leaves (NL), height leaf (HL, cm), crown diameter (CD, cm), total phenols, flavonoids, antioxidant capacity, chlorophyll, vitamin C, enzymatic activity, catalase, superoxide dismutase, and Cu content.

4.5. Yield

To determine the fresh weight (crop yield, g plant−1), the lettuce were harvested and weighed on an analytical balance (Ohaus Corporation, Pine Brook, NJ, USA).

4.6. Nutraceutical Quality

Preparation extract: For the determination of nutraceutical quality, 2 g of lettuce were mixed with 10 mL of ethanol at 80%. A “Stuart” shaker was used to keep the mixture stirring for 24 h. Next, the tubes were centrifuged at 120× g for 24 h. The supernatant (ethanolic extract, EE) was removed for analytical testing.
Total phenolic content was quantified by the Folin–Ciocalteau method [58] 50 µL of EE were used and the results were expressed as mg GAE 100 g−1 FW. Total antioxidant capacity was measured by the DPPH method [59], 50 µL of the EE were utilized and the results were expressed in µM equivalent Trolox 100 g−1 FW. Total flavonoids were quantified in a UV-Vis [1] spectrophotometer (CGOLDEN-WALL, Seattle, WA, USA) at 510 nm and expressed as mg QE 100 g−1 FW.

4.7. Photosynthetic Pigments

Chlorophyll content (mg 100 g−1 FW) was determined by the method of Nagata and Yamashita [60], using the equations:
Chla = 0.999 × Abs 663 − 0.0989 × Abs 645
Chlb = −0.328 × Abs 663 + 1.77 × Abs 645

4.8. Vitamin C

It was obtained by means of the titration method [61]. Fresh fruit samples of 10 g were used, and vitamin C content was calculated using the equation: Vic C (mg 100 g PF) = (mL of 2.6 dichlorophenolindophenol) (0.088) (total volume) (100)/(aliquot volume) (sample weight).

4.9. Enzymatic Activity

Samples of 200 μL of EE were used for the determination of glutathione peroxidase (GPX) by the method of Flohé and Günzler [62]. The results were expressed as a unit (U) per gram of total proteins (U TP−1). Samples or 100 μL of EE were utilized for the quantification of catalase (CAT) by the method of Dhindsa et al. [63] and expressed as U TP−1. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) was determined by SOD Cayman 706002® kit. The results were expressed as U mL−1, where, U is defined as the amount of enzyme needed to exhibit 50% dismutation of the superoxide radical.

4.10. Cu Content in Lettuce Leaves

The copper concentration in lettuce leaves was determined according to the AOAC [64] by atomic absorption spectrophotometry, with an air-acetylene flame (Varian-Spectr AA 3110, Palo Alto, CA, USA), and the results were expressed in µg kg−1 dry weight (DW).

4.11. Statistical Analysis

The experimental design was completely randomized. The normality and homogeneity of the variances of the data obtained were verified using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Bartlett tests, respectively. Subsequently, the analysis of variance of simple classification and post hoc multiple comparison of means was performed through the Tukey HSD test at a probability of 5%, with the software SAS v 9.0 (SAS Institute, 2004, Cary, NC, USA).

5. Conclusions

The foliar application of CuO-NPs improves the nutraceutical quality, antioxidant capacity, and Cu concentration in lettuce leaves, in addition to increasing the activity of the enzymes (GPX, CAT, and SOD), without effects on the yield. Therefore, with the application of Cu-NPs, better quality lettuces are produced for the human diet due to the accumulation of bioactive compounds.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.M.G.-D. and A.O.-C.; methodology, P.P.-R.; software, M.F.-H.; validation, J.M.G.-D. and L.G.H.-M.; formal analysis, J.J.R.-P.; investigation, A.O.-C.; resources, J.M.G.-D.; data collection, J.A.G.-F.; writing—original draft preparation, J.M.G.-D., L.G.H.-M. and P.P.-R.; writing—review and editing, L.G.H.-M. and P.P.-R.; visualization, M.F.-H. and J.J.R.-P.; supervision, L.G.H.-M.; project administration, P.P.-R.; funding acquisition P.P.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by Tecnologico Nacional de Mexico (project #11215.21P).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in article.

Acknowledgments

Hortensia Ortega-Ortiz from CIQA for the donation of the nanoparticles.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hernández-Hernández, H.; Quiterio-Gutiérrez, T.; Cadenas-Pliego, G.; Ortega-Ortiz, H.; Hernández-Fuentes, A.D.; Cabrera de la Fuente, M.; Valdés-Reyna, J.; Juárez-Maldonado, A. Impact of selenium and copper nanoparticles on yield, antioxidant system, and fruit quality of tomato plants. Plants 2019, 8, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Xin, X.; Zhao, F.; Judy, J.D.; He, Z. Cu stress alleviation in corn (Zea mays L.): Comparative efficiency of carbon nanotubes and carbon nanoparticles. NanoImpact 2022, 25, 100381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kranjc, E.; Drobne, D. Nanomaterials in plants: A review of hazard and applications in the agri-food sector. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kumar, V.K.; Muthukrishnan, S.; Rajalakshmi, R.J. Phytostimulatory effect of phytochemical fabricated nanosilver (AgNPs) on Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC. seed germination: An insight from antioxidative enzyme activities and genetic similarity studies. Curr. Plant Biol. 2020, 23, 100158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yusefi-Tanha, E.; Fallah, S.; Rostamnejadi, A.; Pokhrel, L.R. Root system architecture, copper uptake and tissue distribution in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) grown in copper oxide nanoparticle (CuONP) amended soil and implications for human nutrition. Plants 2020, 9, 1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Das Jana, I.; Kumbhakar, P.; Banerjee, S.; Gowda, C.C.; Kedia, N.; Kuila, S.K.; Banerjee, S.; Das, N.C.; Das, A.K.; Manna, I. Copper nanoparticle-graphene composite-based transparent surface coating with antiviral activity against influenza virus. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 4, 352–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ameen, F. Optimization of the synthesis of fungus-mediated bi-metallic Ag-Cu nanoparticles. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lopez-Lima, D.; Mtz-Enriquez, A.I.; Carrión, G.; Basurto-Cereceda, S.; Pariona, N. The bifunctional role of copper nanoparticles in tomato: Effective treatment for Fusarium wilt and plant growth promoter. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 277, 109810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dawood, M.A. Dietary copper requirements for aquatic animals: A review. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rajput, V.; Minkina, T.; Mazarji, M.; Shende, S.; Sushkova, S.; Mandzhieva, S.; Burachevskaya, M.; Chaplygin, V.; Singh, A.; Jatav, H. Accumulation of nanoparticles in the soil-plant systems and their effects on human health. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2020, 65, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nedelkoska, T.; Doran, P.J. Characteristics of heavy metal uptake by plant species with potential for phytoremediation and phytomining. Miner. Eng. 2000, 13, 549–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pietrini, F.; Carnevale, M.; Beni, C.; Zacchini, M.; Gallucci, F.; Santangelo, E. Effect of different copper levels on growth and morphophysiological parameters in giant cane (Arundo donax L.) in the semi-hydroponic mesocosm experiment. Water 2019, 11, 1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Shabbir, Z.; Sardar, A.; Shabbir, A.; Abbas, G.; Shamshad, S.; Khalid, S.; Murtaza, G.; Dumat, C.; Shahid, M. Copper uptake, essentiality, toxicity, detoxification, and risk assessment in soil-plant environment. Chemosphere 2020, 259, 127436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Napoli, M.; Cecchi, S.; Grassi, C.; Baldi, A.; Zanchi, C.A.; Orlandini, S. Phytoextraction of copper from contaminated soil using arable and horticultural crops. Chemosphere 2019, 219, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shams, M.; Ekinci, M.; Turan, M.; Dursun, A.; Kul, R.; Yildirim, E. Growth, nutrient uptake and enzyme activity response of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) to excess copper. Environ. Sustain. 2019, 2, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Makvandi, P.; Wang, C.y.; Zare, E.N.; Borzacchiello, A.; Niu, L.n.; Tay, F.R. Metal-based nanomaterials in biomedical applications: Antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity aspects. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1910021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pohanka, M. Copper and copper nanoparticles toxicity and their impact on basic functions in the body. J. Bratisl. Lek. Listy 2019, 120, 397–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Jaragh-Alhadad, L.A.; Falahati, M. Copper oxide nanoparticles promote amyloid-β-triggered neurotoxicity through formation of oligomeric species as a prelude to Alzheimer’s diseases. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 207, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Sharma, S.; Singh, V.K.; Kumar, A.; Mallubhotla, S. Effect of nanoparticles on oxidative damage and antioxidant defense system in plants. In Molecular Plant Abiotic Stress: Biology and Biotechnology; Roychoudhury, A., Tripathi, T.K., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 315–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. López-Vargas, E.R.; Ortega-Ortíz, H.; Cadenas-Pliego, G.; de Alba Romenus, K.; Cabrera de la Fuente, M.; Benavides-Mendoza, A.; Juárez-Maldonado, A. Foliar application of copper nanoparticles increases the fruit quality and the content of bioactive compounds in tomatoes. J. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kim, M.J.; Moon, Y.; Tou, J.C.; Mou, B.; Waterland, N.L.J. Nutritional value, bioactive compounds and health benefits of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). J. Food Compos. 2016, 49, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Qayyum, M.F.; Ok, Y.S.; Adrees, M.; Ibrahim, M.; Zia-ur-Rehman, M.; Farid, M.; Abbas, F. Effect of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles on growth and physiology of globally important food crops: A critical review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 322, 2–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Paredes, C.R.E.; Soto, J.C.R.; Quiñones, M.C.; Villalaz, C.A.; Peña, A.C.; Alcántara, E.L.; Roque, B.E.C.; Reyna, C.W.A.; Delgado, J.A.; Alva, M.V. Citotoxicidad y genotoxicidad de nanopartículas de cobre sobre Allium cepa L. (Amaryllidaceae). Arnaldoa 2020, 27, e108–e112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Olkhovych, O.; Volkogon, M.; Taran, N.; Batsmanova, L.; Kravchenko, I.J. The effect of copper and zinc nanoparticles on the growth parameters, contents of ascorbic acid, and qualitative composition of amino acids and acylcarnitines in Pistia stratiotes L. (Araceae). Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Zhang, Z.; Ke, M.; Qu, Q.; Peijnenburg, W.; Lu, T.; Zhang, Q.; Ye, Y.; Xu, P.; Du, B.; Sun, L. Impact of copper nanoparticles and ionic copper exposure on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) root morphology and antioxidant response. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 239, 689–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Younes, N.; Hassan, H.S.; Elkady, M.F.; Hamed, A.; Dawood, M.F. Impact of synthesized metal oxide nanomaterials on seedlings production of three Solanaceae crops. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Juárez-Maldonado, A.; Ortega-Ortíz, H.; Morales-Díaz, A.B.; González-Morales, S.; Morelos-Moreno, Á.; Sandoval-Rangel, A.; Cadenas-Pliego, G.; Benavides-Mendoza, A. Nanoparticles and nanomaterials as plant biostimulants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Hernández-Hernández, H.; González-Morales, S.; Benavides-Mendoza, A.; Ortega-Ortiz, H.; Cadenas-Pliego, G.; Juárez-Maldonado, A. Effects of chitosan-PVA and Cu nanoparticles on the growth and antioxidant capacity of tomato under saline stress. Molecules 2018, 23, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Salas-Herrera, G.; González-Morales, S.; Benavides-Mendoza, A.; Castañeda-Facio, A.O.; Fernández-Luqueño, F.; Robledo-Olivo, A. Impact of microalgae culture conditions over the capacity of copper nanoparticle biosynthesis. J. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 31, 2437–2447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kohatsu, M.Y.; Lange, C.N.; Pelegrino, M.T.; Pieretti, J.C.; Tortella, G.; Rubilar, O.; Batista, B.L.; Seabra, A.B.; de Jesus, T.A. Foliar spraying of biogenic CuO nanoparticles protects the defence system and photosynthetic pigments of lettuce (Lactuca sativa). J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 324, 129264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hasan, M.; Mehmood, K.; Mustafa, G.; Zafar, A.; Tariq, T.; Hassan, S.G.; Loomba, S.; Zia, M.; Mazher, A.; Mahmood, N. Phytotoxic evaluation of phytosynthesized silver nanoparticles on lettuce. Coatings 2021, 11, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, L.; Zhang, H.; Wang, J.; Tian, L.; Li, F.; Liu, S.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L.; White, J.C.; Huang, Y. C60 fullerols enhance copper toxicity and alter the leaf metabolite and protein profile in cucumber. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 2171–2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mosa, K.A.; El-Naggar, M.; Ramamoorthy, K.; Alawadhi, H.; Elnaggar, A.; Wartanian, S.; Ibrahim, E.; Hani, H. Copper nanoparticles induced genotoxicty, oxidative stress, and changes in superoxide dismutase (SOD) gene expression in cucumber (Cucumis sativus) plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Kohatsu, M.Y.; Pelegrino, M.T.; Monteiro, L.R.; Freire, B.M.; Pereira, R.M.; Fincheira, P.; Rubilar, O.; Tortella, G.; Batista, B.L.; de Jesus, T.A.J. Comparison of foliar spray and soil irrigation of biogenic CuO nanoparticles (NPs) on elemental uptake and accumulation in lettuce. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 16350–16367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rawat, S.; Cota-Ruiz, K.; Dou, H.; Pullagurala, V.L.; Zuverza-Mena, N.; White, J.C.; Niu, G.; Sharma, N.; Hernandez-Viezcas, J.A.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.J. Soil-Weathered CuO Nanoparticles compromise foliar health and pigment production in spinach (Spinacia oleracea). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 13504–13512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Morgado, R.G.; Pavlaki, M.D.; Soares, A.M.; Loureiro, S. Terrestrial organisms react differently to nano and non-nano Cu(OH)2 forms. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 807, 150679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lung, I.; Opriş, O.; Soran, M.-L.; Culicov, O.; Ciorîță, A.; Stegarescu, A.; Zinicovscaia, I.; Yushin, N.; Vergel, K.; Kacso, I.J. The impact assessment of CuO nanoparticles on the composition and ultrastructure of Triticum aestivum L. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Paciolla, C.; Fortunato, S.; Dipierro, N.; Paradiso, A.; De Leonardis, S.; Mastropasqua, L.; De Pinto, M.C. Vitamin C in plants: From functions to biofortification. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Smirnoff, N.; Conklin, P.L.; Loewus, F.A. Ascorbic acid metabolism and functions: A comparison of plants and mammals. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2001, 52, 437–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Toth, S.Z.; Nagy, V.; Puthur, J.T.; Kovacs, L.; Garab, G. El papel fisiológico del ascorbato como donante de electrones del fotosistema II: Protección contra la fotoinactivación en hojas estresadas por calor. Fisiol. Veg. 2011, 156, 382–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Akram, N.A.; Shafiq, F.; Ashraf, M. Ascorbic acid-a potential oxidant scavenger and its role in plant development and abiotic stress tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Rastogi, A.; Zivcak, M.; Sytar, O.; Kalaji, H.M.; He, X.; Mbarki, S.; Brestic, M. Impact of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles on plant: A critical review. Front. Chem. 2017, 5, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Rai, M.; Ingle, A.P.; Pandit, R.; Paralikar, P.; Shende, S.; Gupta, I.; Biswas, J.K.; da Silva, S.S. Copper and copper nanoparticles: Role in management of insect-pests and pathogenic microbes. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2018, 7, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Pérez-Labrada, F.; López-Vargas, E.R.; Ortega-Ortiz, H.; Cadenas-Pliego, G.; Benavides-Mendoza, A.; Juárez-Maldonado, A. Responses of tomato plants under saline stress to foliar application of copper nanoparticles. Plants 2019, 8, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Sathiyabama, M.; Manikandan, A. Application of copper-chitosan nanoparticles stimulate growth and induce resistance in finger millet (Eleusine coracana Gaertn.) plants against blast disease. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 1784–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bonilla-Bird, N.; Ye, Y.; Akter, T.; Valdes-Bracamontes, C.; Darrouzet-Nardi, A.; Saupe, G.; Flores-Marges, J.; Ma, L.; Hernandez-Viezcas, J.; Peralta-Videa, J. Effect of copper oxide nanoparticles on two varieties of sweetpotato plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 154, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Peng, C.; Xu, C.; Liu, Q.; Sun, L.; Luo, Y.; Shi, J. Fate and transformation of CuO nanoparticles in the soil-rice system during the life cycle of rice plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 4907–4917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Rawat, S.; Pullagurala, V.L.; Hernandez-Molina, M.; Sun, Y.; Niu, G.; Hernandez-Viezcas, J.A.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L. Impacts of copper oxide nanoparticles on bell pepper (Capsicum annum L.) plants: A full life cycle study. Environ. Sci. Nano 2018, 5, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pelegrino, M.T.; Kohatsu, M.Y.; Seabra, A.B.; Monteiro, L.R.; Gomes, D.G.; Oliveira, H.C.; Rolim, W.R.; de Jesus, T.A.; Batista, B.L.; Lange, C.N. Effects of copper oxide nanoparticles on growth of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) seedlings and possible implications of nitric oxide in their antioxidative defense. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2020, 192, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rajput, V.; Minkina, T.; Suskova, S.; Mandzhieva, S.; Tsitsuashvili, V.; Chapligin, V.; Fedorenko, A. Effects of copper nanoparticles (CuO NPs) on crop plants: A mini review. BioNanoScience 2018, 8, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xiong, T.; Dumat, C.; Dappe, V.; Vezin, H.; Schreck, E.; Shahid, M.; Pierart, A.; Sobanska, S. Copper oxide nanoparticle foliar uptake, phytotoxicity, and consequences for sustainable urban agriculture. Environ. Sci. 2017, 51, 5242–5251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Giampietro, R.; Spinelli, F.; Contino, M.; Colabufo, N.A. The pivotal role of copper in neurodegeneration: A new strategy for the therapy of neurodegenerative disorders. Mol. Pharm. 2018, 15, 808–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Al-Hakkani, M.F. Biogenic copper nanoparticles and their applications: A review. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Taylor, A.A.; Tsuji, J.S.; Garry, M.R.; McArdle, M.E.; Goodfellow, W.L.; Adams, W.J.; Menzie, C.A. Critical review of exposure and effects: Implications for setting regulatory health criteria for ingested copper. Environ. Manag. 2020, 65, 131–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Steiner, A.A. A universal method for preparing nutrient solutions of a certain desired composition. Plant Soil 1961, 15, 134–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Ortega-Ortiz, H.; Gaucin-Delgado, J.M.; Preciado-Rangel, P.; Fortis-Hernandez, M.; Hernandez-Montiel, L.G.; De la Cruz-Lazaro, E.; Lara-Capistran, L. Copper oxide nanoparticles biosynthetized improve germination and bioactive compounds in wheat sprouts. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. 2022, 50, 12657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kasana, R.C.; Panwar, N.R.; Kaul, R.K.; Kumar, P.J.E.C.L. Biosynthesis and effects of copper nanoparticles on plants. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2017, 15, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Singleton, V.L.; Orthofer, R.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol. 1999, 299, 152–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.-E.; Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nagata, M.; Yamashita, I. Simple method for simultaneous determination of chlorophyll and carotenoids in tomato fruit. J. Jpn. Soc. Food Sci. Technol. 1992, 39, 925–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Ordóñez-Santos, L.E.; Martínez-Girón, J.; Arias-Jaramillo, M.E. Effect of ultrasound treatment on visual color, vitamin C, total phenols, and carotenoids content in Cape gooseberry juice. Food Chem. 2017, 233, 96–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Flohe, L.; Günzler, W.; Schock, H. Glutathione peroxidase: A selenoenzyme. FEBS Lett. 1973, 32, 132–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Dhindsa, R.S.; Plumb-Dhindsa, P.; Thorpe, T.A. Leaf senescence: Correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation, and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. J. Exp. Bot. 1981, 32, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Washington, DC, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
Plants 11 00912 g001 550
Figure 1. Content of total phenols (a), flavonoids (b), antioxidant capacity (c), chlorophyll (d), and vitamin C (e) due to the effect of different doses of CuO-NPs applied in lettuce. Data shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Different letters indicate a significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey’s test. GAE = gallic acid equivalents; QE = quercetin; FW = fresh weight.
Figure 1. Content of total phenols (a), flavonoids (b), antioxidant capacity (c), chlorophyll (d), and vitamin C (e) due to the effect of different doses of CuO-NPs applied in lettuce. Data shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Different letters indicate a significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey’s test. GAE = gallic acid equivalents; QE = quercetin; FW = fresh weight.
Plants 11 00912 g001
Plants 11 00912 g002 550
Figure 2. Content of glutathione peroxidase (a), catalase (b), superoxide dismutase (c), and copper (d) due to the effect of different doses of CuO-NPs applied in lettuce. Data shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Different letters indicate a significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey´s test. U = unit (U); TP = total proteins; PW = dry weight.
Figure 2. Content of glutathione peroxidase (a), catalase (b), superoxide dismutase (c), and copper (d) due to the effect of different doses of CuO-NPs applied in lettuce. Data shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Different letters indicate a significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey´s test. U = unit (U); TP = total proteins; PW = dry weight.
Plants 11 00912 g002
Table
Table 1. Yield components due to the effect of the different concentrations of CuO-NPs applied via foliar.
Table 1. Yield components due to the effect of the different concentrations of CuO-NPs applied via foliar.
CuO-NPs
mg mL−1		Yield
g Plant−1		NLHLCD
cm
0137.93 ± 23.63 a *44.33 ± 7.37 a *24.4 a ± 3.92 *33.5 ± 1.77 a *
0.5162.58 ± 21.58 a51.66 ± 8.08 a19.8 ± 4.27 a35.8 ± 1.61 a
1172.97 ± 19.63 a41.67 ± 8.03 a32.8 ± 4.29 a35.1 ±1.79 a
2154.47 ± 17.56 a43.33 ± 9.05 a23.1 ± 4.23 a34.4 ± 1.81 a
4192.73 ± 22.20 a31.00 ± 9.02 a25.7 ± 4.08 a39.1 ± 1.94 a
6200.73 ± 21.03 a53.66 ± 9.32 a25.1 ± 3.97 a36.3 ± 1.94 a
* Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation (SD, n = 30). Different letters indicate a significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey’s test. NL = number of leaves; HL = height leaf; CD = crown diameter.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gaucin-Delgado, J.M.; Ortiz-Campos, A.; Hernandez-Montiel, L.G.; Fortis-Hernandez, M.; Reyes-Pérez, J.J.; Gonzáles-Fuentes, J.A.; Preciado-Rangel, P. CuO-NPs Improve Biosynthesis of Bioactive Compounds in Lettuce. Plants 2022, 11, 912. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070912

AMA Style

Gaucin-Delgado JM, Ortiz-Campos A, Hernandez-Montiel LG, Fortis-Hernandez M, Reyes-Pérez JJ, Gonzáles-Fuentes JA, Preciado-Rangel P. CuO-NPs Improve Biosynthesis of Bioactive Compounds in Lettuce. Plants. 2022; 11(7):912. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070912

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gaucin-Delgado, Jazmín M., Adriel Ortiz-Campos, Luis G. Hernandez-Montiel, Manuel Fortis-Hernandez, Juan J. Reyes-Pérez, José A. Gonzáles-Fuentes, and Pablo Preciado-Rangel. 2022. "CuO-NPs Improve Biosynthesis of Bioactive Compounds in Lettuce" Plants 11, no. 7: 912. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070912

APA Style

Gaucin-Delgado, J. M., Ortiz-Campos, A., Hernandez-Montiel, L. G., Fortis-Hernandez, M., Reyes-Pérez, J. J., Gonzáles-Fuentes, J. A., & Preciado-Rangel, P. (2022). CuO-NPs Improve Biosynthesis of Bioactive Compounds in Lettuce. Plants, 11(7), 912. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070912

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop