Next Article in Journal
A Novel Strategy to Reveal the Landscape of Crossovers in an F1 Hybrid Population of Populus deltoides and Populus simonii
Next Article in Special Issue
Adnate Leaf-Base and the Origin of Ribs in Succulent Stems of Euphorbia L.
Previous Article in Journal
CRISPR/Cas9 in Planta Hairy Root Transformation: A Powerful Platform for Functional Analysis of Root Traits in Soybean
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design of Experiments-Based Optimization of Flavonoids Extraction from Daphne genkwa Flower Buds and Flavonoids Contents at Different Blooming Stages
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Striga hermonthica Suicidal Germination Activity of Potent Strigolactone Analogs: Evaluation from Laboratory Bioassays to Field Trials

1
The BioActives Lab, Center for Desert Agriculture, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
2
Institut de l’Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles (INERA), Ouagadougou 04 BP 8645, Burkina Faso
3
Applied Biological Chemistry, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
4
Institute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
5
Plant Science Program, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(8), 1045; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11081045
Submission received: 11 March 2022 / Revised: 4 April 2022 / Accepted: 11 April 2022 / Published: 12 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 10th Anniversary of Plants—Recent Advances and Perspectives)

Abstract

:
The obligate hemiparasite Striga hermonthica is one of the major global biotic threats to agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa, causing severe yield losses of cereals. The germination of Striga seeds relies on host-released signaling molecules, mainly strigolactones (SLs). This dependency opens up the possibility of deploying SL analogs as “suicidal germination agents” to reduce the accumulated seed bank of Striga in infested soils. Although several synthetic SL analogs have been developed for this purpose, the utility of these compounds in realizing the suicidal germination strategy for combating Striga is still largely unknown. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of three potent SL analogs (MP3, MP16, and Nijmegen-1) under laboratory, greenhouse, and farmer’s field conditions. All investigated analogs showed around a 50% Striga germination rate, equivalent to a 50% reduction in infestation, which was comparable to the standard SL analog GR24. Importantly, MP16 had the maximum reduction of Striga emergence (97%) in the greenhouse experiment, while Nijmegen-1 appeared to be a promising candidate under field conditions, with a 43% and 60% reduction of Striga emergence in pearl millet and sorghum fields, respectively. These findings confirm that the selected SL analogs appear to make promising candidates as simple suicidal agents both under laboratory and real African field conditions, which may support us to improve suicidal germination technology to deplete the Striga seed bank in African agriculture.

1. Introduction

Cereal crops, particularly maize (Zea mays), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), and pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum), are important nutrient and livelihood sources for people in the region of sub-Saharan Africa [1]. However, the average yield of these cereals in Africa is very low, as compared to the world average. Increasing the per hectare yield of crops is one of the major challenges to alleviate hunger and poverty in sub-Saharan Africa [2]. Indeed, the agriculture practiced by the majority of smallholder farmers in Africa is facing a wide range of threats, such as low soil fertility, recurrent drought, and many biotic constraints, particularly parasitic weeds. One of the most troublesome and noxious weeds is Striga hermonthica (Striga), which hinders crop production and causes more than 50% cereal yield losses in sub-Saharan Africa [3,4].
Striga hermonthica (also known as purple witchweed) is an obligate and hemiparasitic plant that parasitizes the root systems of cereals. It is now even becoming a persistent threat to crop production in sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and parts of Asia [5,6,7,8]. It is estimated that Striga causes more than 50% cereal yield losses in sub-Saharan Africa and has already infested up to 40% (approximately 50 million hectares) of cropland in this region [9,10,11], thus building a large reservoir for further propagation and spreading of this weed. Although Striga has infested several regions of Africa, the most severely infested countries are Burkina Faso, Gambia, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Togo (West Africa), Ethiopia, Eritrea, Kenya, Mozambique, Malawi, Somalia, Tanzania (East Africa), and Sudan. Beyond those, Striga infestation is gradually spreading to other African countries, such as Cameron, Rwanda, Congo, Burundi, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. The ever-increasing Striga problem incurs an annual loss of US $7–10 billion per annum to the livelihoods of African farmers, and its elevated levels in vast areas will further worsen situations of food insecurity, hunger, and poverty for millions of subsistence farmers [12,13,14,15]. Hence, developing suitable Striga control strategies to minimize the damage is of urgent need for African agriculture.
Despite the debilitating yield losses caused by Striga, effective control measures are still far beyond success. Production of more than 200,000 tiny (0.3 nm  ×  0.15 nm), light (4–7 μg), and long-lived (>15 years) viable seeds by a single Striga plant, characterized by a complex life cycle and underground parasitism, makes Striga control burdensome [16,17]. Even though local farmers are aware of the Striga problem, many factors, such as poverty, limited resources, and harsh weather have impeded the control of this parasite in infested areas. In such cases, the key principles for effective control of Striga should be prevention of new seed production, significant reduction in the soil seed bank, and avoiding spreading of seeds from infested to non-infested soils [18,19,20,21].
The tiny Striga seeds have developed a host detection strategy by perceiving host-released signaling molecules, mainly the phytohormone strigolactones (SLs), which trigger their germination [22,23,24]. Strigolactones (SLs) are a group of evolutionarily conserved carotenoid-derived plant hormones that regulate many aspects of plant biology [25,26,27]. The well-known reason why plants release SLs is to successfully communicate with the surrounding arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) for symbiotic interactions [23,28]. In the parasitic plant Striga, the receptors responsible for SL-induced seed germination are Striga hermonthica hyposensitive to light (ShHTLs), a group of α/β s that are assumed to be evolutionarily derived from a karrikin-insensitive2 (KAI2) receptor and to arise through gene duplication with functional replacement by SLs [29]. Among the several SL receptors, ShHTL7 is the most sensitive to SLs, suggesting a major role in modulating the seed germination of Striga [30,31]. Recently, ShHTL7 has been further characterized as a non-canonical receptor by noting how covalently linked intermediate molecule (CLIM), the SL hydrolysis intermediate, interacts with the F-box proteins ShMAX2 and SMAX1 to mediate SL signaling transduction [32], in a similar way as to rice D14. After successful germination and attachment to the host roots, Striga seedlings start siphoning off nutrients and water [33,34]. This dependency of Striga germination on host-released SLs and host attachment can be utilized as an effective management strategy [15,35]. The induction of Striga seeds’ germination through synthetic SL analogs in the absence of the host leads to the death of germinating seedlings at the latest a few days after germination [36,37]. This mechanism builds the basis for a promising control strategy, known as “suicidal germination”, which can reduce the Striga seed bank in the infested soils [38,39,40]. However, the assessment of utility and the employment of suicidal germination relies on the development of cheap and potent SL analogs. Although this technology has been suggested and advocated in several studies to combat not only Striga [37,38,39,40,41,42,43] but also other root parasites of the Orobanchaceae family, in the past 40 years, its application in real African fields remains contested. Despite the availability of several SL analogs and mimics, the selection of simple SL analogs to be used as potential Striga suicidal agents, especially under field conditions, is still a challenge. In the present study, we selected two potent methyl phenlactonoates (MP3 and MP16) [24,37] and a well-known, easy-to-synthesize SL analog, Nijmegen-1 [43], for a comparative study on inducing Striga seed germination, first under laboratory conditions.

2. Results

2.1. Striga Seed Germination Bioassays in Response to Various Strigolactone Analogs

The structures of the selected SL analogs are shown in Figure 1. All selected SL analogs at the 1 μM concentration showed a 49–52% Striga germination rate, which is statistically equal to the standard SL analog GR24 (64%) (Figure 2). However, Striga seeds were more sensitive to a lower concentration of GR24 (0.1 μM) with a maximum germination rate (66%), compared to the two other analogs at the same concentration (34–37%). Interestingly, higher concentrations, (1–10 μM) did not show any significant differences between SL analogs. Next, we applied these SL analogs to Striga seeds collected from Kenya, Burkina, and Niger to account for differences between Striga populations from different origins (Supplementary Figure S1). At a concentration of 1 μM, GR24 and MP3 showed a higher germination rate (20–22%) than MP16 and Nijmegen-1 (14%) in the Striga seeds collected from Burkina Faso. In contrast, the four SL analogs exhibited statistically equal Striga germinating activity (11–16%) on the seeds collected from Kenya and Niger. These results unraveled differences in the sensitivity of Striga populations toward SL analogs but also indicated that the selected analogs could be candidates for testing and realizing the introduction of suicidal germination technology in various parts of Africa.

2.2. Striga Emergence on Strigolactone Analogs’ Treatment under Greenhouse Conditions

Surprisingly, all three SL analogs showed a significant reduction in Striga emergence in comparison to the control treatment (Figure 3A–C). The reducing effect of MP16 on Striga emergence was strongest (97%), followed by Nijmegen-1 (89%) and MP3 (73%). As expected, the application of SLs led to improved growth of the host plant due to lower infection of viable Striga plants. In particular, MP16-treated pots had the same plant heights as non-infested plants. Application of MP3 and Nijmegen-1 also improved plant growth as compared to the control treatment, but to a lesser extent than MP16, which indicated that the latter is the most potent suicidal agent among the selected analogs under greenhouse conditions (Figure 3C).

2.3. Effect of Strigolactone Analogs on Striga Infection under Field Conditions

In the pearl millet field, application of Nijmegen-1 led a smaller number of Striga plants to emerge (32 ± 6.1), followed by MP16 (33 ± 9.8) and MP3 (37 ± 6.7), as compared to the control plot (56 ± 16.4). In other words, treatment with Nijmegen-1, MP16, and MP3 led to a 43%, 41%, and 33% reduction of Striga emergence, respectively (Figure 4C). In the sorghum field, formulated Nijmegen-1 also exhibited the highest reduction of Striga emergence (60%), followed by formulated MP3 (52%) and MP16 (11%) (Figure 5C). With respect to the host plants, we observed a 38% increase in pearl millet grain yield and 64% for the stalk yield on MP16 application, whereas MP3 showed a moderate effect on grain yield (9%) and biomass yield (30%). Surprisingly, the application of Nijmegen-1 showed a reduction of pearl millet grain yield (13% less than blank), accompanied by a 31% increase in biomass yield (Figure 4D) In contrast, the application of this SL analog to sorghum led to the maximum observed increase in grain yield (13% higher than blank), while MP3 and MP16 did not show a pronounced effect (−4% and 3%, respectively). All the treatments showed a 1–37% increase in sorghum biomass yield over the blank treatment (Figure 5D). These results indicate the applicability of the selected SL analogs under real field conditions and their potential to solve the severe food security threats caused by Striga.

3. Discussion

The performance of three selected synthetic SL analogs (Figure 1) for Striga control was first assessed and confirmed using in vitro bioassays. The results showed that MP3, MP16, and Nijmegen-1 are all potent SL analogs inducing Striga seed germination (Figure 2). Previously, the moderate activity of Nijmegen-1 was reported for Striga germination [43,44,45], but our bioassays showed its comparable Striga germination activity at a high dose (1–10 μM). Similarly, we recently reported that MP3 and MP16 exhibit high bioactivity in stimulating Striga seed germination [24,37], which is in agreement with the outcome of this work. In addition, these SL analogs were also tested on different Striga batches collected from Burkina Faso, Niger, and Kenya. Although all SL analogs (at 1 μM) induce Striga seed germination ranging from 12–20%, this activity level is not as high as we observed in a Striga batch collected from Sudan. This result demonstrates that the sensitivity toward a certain SL analog depends on the ecotype of the Striga population. In addition, it shows the need to have an array of SL analogs to realize the suicidal germination strategy in different parts of Africa. Nevertheless, the results obtained with different Striga populations indicate that the selected SL analogs can be used in different regions of Africa, although with different efficiency levels.
The bioactivity of Nijmegen-1 was previously tested under pot conditions at a lower concentration (0.5 μM) and reported to be relatively weak [39]. In the present pot study, we modified the testing protocol by increasing the concentration of SL analogs to 1 μM and the number of applications to two. The results obtained indicated that increasing the dose and frequency of SL analogs might be an effective way to improve their efficacy as suicidal agents against Striga. The maximum 97% reduction in Striga emergence on the application of MP16 showed its potential to be used as a suicidal agent (Figure 3). Although we reported a high Striga germination-inducing activity of MP1, which carries a 4-nitro substituent on the benzene ring of MP3 [24,39], its synthesis is complex and expensive due to the involvement of additional synthesis steps and introduction of a 4-nitro group. So, alternately, we redesigned and synthesized another SL analog MP16, which is comparatively simple and easy to synthesize at a low cost. The Striga germination-inducing activity of the proposed MP16 was comparable to MP1. Similarly, the selected SL analogs might also potentially regulate the plant root architecture and above-ground shoot development when applied to a field [46]. However, there is still a lack of experimental evidence to support our understanding of the mechanisms involved. The actual molecular basis for the SL analogs on crop plants and crosstalk with other phytohormones still needs to be further investigated.
In field trials, we observed that all selected analogs caused a reduction in Striga emergence for both pearl millet and sorghum fields; however, these differences were statistically non-significant (Figure 4 and Figure 5). This might be attributed to the great variation in Striga infestation level between each plot. Moreover, the Striga seed density in the soil, soil texture, structure, pH, farmer’s cultural practices, and the amount of rainfall to the field are all possible factors affecting the observed variations between two fields and their replications. Weak activity of MP3 and Nijmegen-1 in clay soil and high in sandy loam-mixture soil has already been reported [39]. In addition, the inconsistency in the performance of MP3 and Nijmegen-1 for farmer’s fields has been indicated in a previous study [39], showing reductions of 55% and 65% in Striga emergence in a pearl millet field (sandy soil) but no significant impact (12–20%) in a sorghum field (clay soil). In the present study, we increased the number of applications from two to four and observed 33–43% and 60–52% reductions in Striga emergence by MP3 and Nijmegen-1 in a pearl millet and sorghum field, respectively. Due to seed dormancy or pre-conditioning requirements, Striga seeds are not synchronous in their germination response to SL analogs; hence, we suggested at least four-time repeated applications of SL analogs for maximum eradication of the seed bank in the infested soil. Then, the compound should reach Striga seeds to induce their germination. The success of the suicidal germination depends on many factors that are not restricted to the frequency and concentration of the suicidal agents but also include the type of the soil, climate conditions, and amount and frequency of rainfall [39,47]. In addition, it is very important to develop a handy, cost-effective, and stable formulation of suicidal agents that must be easily accessible to African farmers [48].
In summary, our results demonstrate the potential of the three selected simple SL analogs in combating Striga. The selected SL analogs will allow the development of further analogs as well as testing and optimizing of formulations and application protocols that aim at depleting the Striga seed bank and increasing food security. Moreover, combining the suicidal germination strategy with resistant crop varieties and/or suitable crop rotation or intercropping will likely alleviate the Striga problem significantly in the infested regions of Africa.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Chemicals

The SL analogs rac-GR24, MP3, and Nijmegen-1 were synthesized and provided by Prof. Binne Zawanenburg, Radboud University, The Netherlands. The SL analog MP16 was synthesized and provided by Prof. Tadao Asami, University of Tokyo, Japan. The procedure for the synthesis of SL analogs has already been described previously [24,37,43,49]. Striga hermonthica seeds were collected from an infested sorghum field during 2020 in Sudan (Prof. A. G. Babiker), from a maize field during 2018 in Kenya (Prof. Steven Runo, Kenyata University), from a pearl millet field during 2020 in Burkina Faso (Dr. Djibril Yonli, INERA), and a pearl millet field during 2019 in Niger (Dr. Mohammed Riyazaddin, ICRISAT). Seeds of rice IAC-165 were obtained from Africa Rice, Tanzania (Dr. Jonne Rodenburg). The emulsifier Atlas G-1086, a polyoxyethylene sorbitol hexaoleate, was obtained from CRODA, The Netherlands.

4.2. Striga Seed Germination Bioassays

The germination activity of the selected SL analogs on Striga hermonthica seeds was determined by using a previously described procedure [50,51]. For pre-conditioning, Striga seeds were surface sterilized with 50% commercial bleach for seven minutes, followed by six washing steps with MiliQ water in a laminar fume hood. Then, about 50–100 surface-sterilized Striga seeds were uniformly spread on a glass-fiber filter-paper disc (9 mm), and 12 discs with Striga seeds were put in a Petri dish on sterilized filter paper moistened with 3 mL MiliQ water. The sealed Petri dishes were incubated in the dark at 30 °C for 10 days. On the 11th day, the discs were dried under a laminar flow cabinet, and the SL analogs (50 μL) were applied to each disc with various concentration ranges (10−5 M to 10−7 M). Being very active, the synthetic SL analog GR24 was used as a standard positive control instead of natural SL, which is very scarce in plants, unstable, and difficult to extract. After application, the Striga seeds were induced to germinate in the dark for 24 h at 30 °C. The discs were scanned under a binocular microscope and germinated, and non-germinated seeds were counted by SeedQuant [52], with a germination rate (in %) then calculated.

4.3. Striga Emergence under Greenhouse Conditions

To further evaluate their bioactivity, we tested the three SL analogs in Striga-infested pots under greenhouse conditions, using a highly susceptible rice cv. IAC 165 as a host crop. The SL analogs were applied twice at 1 μM concentration to artificially infested preconditioned Striga pots. After 10 days of application, three one-week-old rice seedlings were planted in each pot, and Striga emergence was counted at 10 weeks after sowing (WAS). A mixture of soil (Stender, Basissubstrat) with sand (3:1 ratio) was prepared [53] and about 0.5 L of this mixture without Striga seeds was added to the bottom of a 3-L perforated plastic pot. Then, about 20 mg (~8000) Striga seeds were thoroughly mixed in a 1.5-L soil mixture and added on the top of clean soil in the same pot. The Striga seeds were preconditioned in a greenhouse under hot (30 °C) and moist conditions for 10 days. On the 11th day, each pot was supplied with 500 ml (1 μM) SL analogs, and Striga seeds were allowed to germinate for suicidal death without a host for another 10 days. Then, three one-week-old rice seedlings (IAC-165, a Striga-sensitive variety) were planted in the middle of each pot. The rice plants were allowed to grow under normal growth conditions (30 °C, 65% RH, normal sunlight). After 10 weeks, Striga emergence was observed in each pot and compared with the mock treatment.

4.4. Striga Emergence under Field Conditions

Next, the suicidal germinating bioactivity of three selected SL analogs was further investigated under naturally infested rainfed farmer’s field conditions in Burkina Faso (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Formulated SL analogs were applied at a 1 μM final concentration four times on the onset of rainfall. The three selected candidate SL analogs were further evaluated under field conditions in eastern Burkina Faso. Two highly Striga-infested pearl millet and sorghum fields, located near the Kouaré research station (11°58′49″ N, 0°18′30″ E) of INERA (Institut de l’Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles), were selected. Trials were established in each farmer’s field, following a randomized complete block design with four independent replications using 4 m × 4 m (or 16 m2) plots. Each plot consisted of five (5) ridges/rows, and the distance between ridge/row was 0.80 m; all plots were spaced with four (4) ridges/rows to avoid any SL contamination through run-off. The emulsifier Atlas G-1086 was used to formulate MP3, MP16, and Nijmegen-1. Each SL analog was applied (25 mL/m2 at 400 µM) in formulated form four times in each field after the onset of rainfall (≥10 mm) to make a final concentration of 1 µM. A blank treatment (Atlas-G only) was included as the control. The experimental crops pearl millet (local cultivar Idipiéni) and sorghum (local cultivar Itchoari) were sown at least one week after the last application. The rainfall was 391.5 mm recorded in 25 days and 617 mm in 27 days during the pearl millet and sorghum growth period, respectively. Plots were weeded twice (15 and 30 days after sowing (DAS)) with hand hoeing before Striga emergence. Then, weeds other than Striga plants were hand-pulled until crop harvest. The emerged Striga plants were counted at 80 DAS, corresponding to the period of maximum emergence of Striga plants in the plots.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

Collected data were analyzed using statistical software package R (version 3.2.2) and GraphPad Prism (version 9.1.1). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the least significant difference (LSD) multiple range test and unpaired t-test were used to analyze the effect of different SL analogs on Striga infestation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11081045/s1, Figure S1: Striga seed germination in response to MP3, MP16, and Nijmegen-1 treatments.

Author Contributions

S.A.-B. and M.J. conceived and designed the experiments. M.J., J.Y.W. and L.B. performed laboratory and greenhouse studies. D.Y., H.T. and O.M. conducted field trials. B.Z., T.O. and T.A. helped with the synthesis of SL analogs. J.Y.W., M.J. and S.A.-B. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (grant number OPP1136424 to S.A.), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, and a JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (grant number 18H05266 to T.A.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Abdel Gabar Babiker, The National Research Center, Sudan; Steven Runo, Kenyatta University, Kenya; Mohammed Riyazaddin, ICRISAT, Niger for providing S. hermonthica seeds. We are thankful to Jonne Rodenburg, Africa Rice, Tanzania for providing seeds of rice cv. IAC-165. We thank Boubacar A. Kountché for his valuable time spent discussing this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ejeta, G. Breeding for Striga Resistance in Sorghum: Exploitation of an Intricate Host-Parasite Biology. Crop Sci. 2007, 47, 216–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Khan, Z.R.; Midega, C.A.O.; Pittchar, J.O.; Murage, A.W.; Birkett, M.A.; Bruce, T.J.A.; Pickett, J.A. Achieving Food Security for one Million Sub-Saharan African Poor Through Push-Pull Innovation by 2020. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 2014, 369, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Scott, D.; Scholes, J.D.; Randrianjafizanaka, M.T.; Randriamampianina, J.A.; Autfray, P.; Freckleton, R.P. Identifying Existing Management Practices in the Control of Striga asiatica within Rice–Maize Systems in Mid-West Madagascar. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 11, 13579–13592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rodenburg, J.; Riches, C.R.; Kayeke, J.M. Addressing Current and Future Problems of Parasitic Weeds in Rice. Crop Prot. 2010, 29, 210–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gressel, J.; Hanafi, A.; Head, G.; Marasas, W.; Obilana, A.B.; Ochanda, J.; Souissi, T.; Tzotzos, G. Major Heretofore Intractable Biotic Constraints to African Food Security that may be Amenable to Novel Biotechnological Solutions. Crop Prot. 2004, 23, 661–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ejeta, G. The Striga Scourge in Africa: A Growing Pandemic. In Integrating New Technologies for Striga Control: Towards Ending the Witch-Hunt, 2nd ed.; Ejeta, G., Gressel, J., Eds.; World Scientific: Singapore, 2007; pp. 3–16. [Google Scholar]
  7. Scholes, J.D.; Press, M.C. Striga Infestation of Cereal Crops–an Unsolved Problem in Resource Limited Agriculture. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2008, 11, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Parker, C. Parasitic Weeds: A World Challenge. Weed Sci. 2012, 60, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rich, P.J.; Grenier, U.; Ejeta, G. Striga Resistance in the Wild Relatives of Sorghum. Crop Sci. 2004, 44, 2221–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pennisi, E. Armed and Dangerous. Science 2010, 327, 804–805. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rodenburg, J.; Demont, M.; Zwart, S.J.; Bastiaans, L. Parasitic Weed Incidence and Related Economic Losses in Rice in Africa. Agri. Econ. Environ. 2016, 235, 306–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Rodenburg, J.; Bastiaans, L.; Weltzien, E.; Hess, D.E. How can Field Selection for Striga Resistance and Tolerance in Sorghum be Improved? Field Crop. Res. 2005, 93, 34–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Westwood, J.H.; Depamphilis, C.W.; Das, M.; Fernández-Aparicio, M.; Honaas, L.A.; Timko, M.P.; Wafula, E.K.; Wickett, N.J.; Yoder, J.I. The Parasitic Plant Genome Project: New Tools for Understanding the Biology of Orobanche and Striga. Weed Sci. 2012, 60, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pennisi, E. How Crop-Killing Witchweed Senses its Victims. Science 2015, 350, 146–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jamil, M.; Kountche, B.A.; Al-Babili, S. Current Progress in Striga Management. Plant Physiol. 2021, 185, 1339–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bebawi, F.F.; Eplee, R.E.; Harris, C.E.; Norris, R.S. Longevity of Witchweed (Striga asiatica) Seed. Weed Sci. 1984, 32, 494–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gbèhounou, G.; Pieterse, A.H.; Verkleij, J.A. Longevity of Striga Seeds Reconsidered: Results of a Field Study on Purple Witchweed (Striga hermonthica) in Benin. Weed Sci. 2003, 51, 940–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Berner, D.; Kling, J.; Singh, B. Striga Research and Control. A Perspective from Africa. Plant Dis. 1995, 79, 652–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Joel, D.M. The Long-term Approach to Parasitic Weeds Control: Manipulation of Specific Developmental Mechanisms of the Parasite. Crop Prot. 2000, 19, 753–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, S.; Adetimirin, V.; The, C.; Dossou, R. Yield Losses in Maize due to Striga hermonthica in West and Central Africa. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2002, 48, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gbèhounou, G.; Adango, E. Trap Crops of Striga hermonthica: In vitro Identification and Effectiveness in situ. Crop Prot. 2003, 22, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yoneyama, K.; Awad, A.A.; Xie, X.; Yoneyama, K.; Takeuchi, Y. Strigolactones as Germination Stimulants for Root Parasitic Plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51, 1095–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Al-Babili, S.; Bouwmeester, H.J. Strigolactones, a Novel Carotenoid-Derived Plant Hormone. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2015, 66, 161–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jamil, M.; Kountche, B.A.; Haider, I.; Guo, X.J.; Ntui, V.O.; Jia, K.P.; Ali, S.; Hameed, U.S.; Nakamura, H.; Lyu, Y.; et al. Methyl Phenlactonoates are Efficient Strigolactone Analogs with Simple Structure. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 2319–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Xie, X.N.; Yoneyama, K.; Yoneyama, K. The Strigolactone Story. Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 2010, 48, 93–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Felemban, A.; Braguy, J.; Zurbriggen, M.D.; Al-Babili, S. Apocarotenoids Involved in Plant Development and Stress Response. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wang, J.Y.; Lin, P.-Y.; Al-Babili, S. On the Biosynthesis and Evolution of Apocarotenoid Plant Growth Regulators. Sem. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 109, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fiorilli, V.; Wang, J.Y.; Bonfante, P.; Lanfranco, L.; Al-Babili, S. Apocarotenoids: Old and New Mediators of the Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Conn, C.E.; Nelson, D.C. Evidence that KARRIKIN-INSENSITIVE2 (KAI2) Receptors may Perceive an Unknown Signal that is not Karrikin or Strigolactone. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 6, 1219–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tsuchiya, Y.; Yoshimura, M.; Sato, Y.; Kuwata, K.; Toh, S.; Holbrook-Smith, D.; Zhang, H.; Mccourt, P.; Itami, K. Probing strigolactone receptors in Striga hermonthica with fluorescence. Science 2015, 349, 864–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zarban, R.A.; Hameed, U.F.S.; Jamil, M.; Ota, T.; Wang, J.Y.; Arold, S.; Asami, T.; Al-Babili, S. Rational Design of Striga hermonthica-Specific Seed Germination Inhibitors. Plant Physiol. 2022, 188, 1369–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yao, R.; Wang, F.; Ming, Z.; Du, X.; Chen, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Deng, H.; Xie, D. ShHTL7 is a Non-canonical Receptor for Strigolactones in Root Parasitic Weeds. Cell Res. 2017, 27, 838–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Shen, H.; Ye, W.; Hong, L.; Huang, H.; Wang, Z.; Deng, X.; Yang, Q.; Xu, Z. Progress in Parasitic Plant Biology: Host Selection and Nutrient Transfer. Plant Biol. 2006, 8, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Westwood, J.H. The Physiology of the Established Parasite–Host Association. In Parasitic Orobanchaceae; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 87–114. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rubiales, D.; Fernández-Aparicio, M.; Vurro, M.; Eizenberg, H. Advances in Parasitic Weed Research. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Zwanenburg, B.; Pospíšil, T. Structure and Activity of Strigolactones: New Plant Hormones with a Rich Future. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 38–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Jamil, M.; Kountche, B.A.; Wang, J.Y.; Haider, I.; Jia, K.-P.; Takahashi, I.; Ota, T.; Asami, T.; Al-Babili, S. A New Series of Carlactonoic Acid Based Strigolactone Analogs for Fundamental and Applied Research. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Zwanenburg, B.; Pospisil, T.; Zeljkovic, S.C. Strigolactones: New Plant Hormones in Action. Planta 2016, 243, 1311–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kountche, B.A.; Jamil, M.; Yonli, D.; Nikiema, M.P.; Blanco-Ania, D.; Asami, T.; Zwanenburg, B.; Al-Babili, S. Suicidal Germination as a Control Strategy for Striga hermonthica (Benth.) in Smallholder Farms of Sub-Saharan Africa. Plants People Planet 2019, 1, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Eplee, R.E. Ethylene: A Witchweed Seed Germination Stimulant. Weed Sci. 1975, 23, 433–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Samejima, H.; Babiker, A.G.; Takikawa, H.; Sasaki, M.; Sugimoto, Y. Practicality of the Suicidal Germination Approach for Controlling Striga hermonthica. Pest Manag. Sci. 2016, 72, 2035–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zwanenburg, B.; Blanco-Ania, D. Strigolactones: New Plant Hormones in the Spotlight. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 2205–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nefkens, G.H.; Thuring, J.W.J.; Beenakkers, M.F.; Zwanenburg, B. Synthesis of a Phthaloylglycine-Derived Strigol Analogue and its Germination Stimulatory Activity Toward Seeds of the Parasitic Weeds Striga hermonthica and Orobanche crenata. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45, 2273–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Mwakaboko, A.S.; Zwanenburg, B. Single Step Synthesis of Strigolactone Analogues from Cyclic Keto Enols, Germination Stimulants for Seeds of Parasitic Weeds. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011, 19, 5006–5011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Jamil, M.; Kountche, B.A.; Haider, I.; Wang, J.Y.; Aldossary, F.; Zarban, R.A.; Jia, K.P.; Yonli, D.; Hameed, U.F.S.; Takahashi, I.; et al. Methylation at the C-3′ in D-Ring of Strigolactone Analogs Reduces Biological Activity in Root Parasitic Plants and Rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Aliche, E.B.; Screpanti, C.; De Mesmaeker, A.; Munnik, T.; Bouwmeester, H.J. Science and Application of Strigolactones. New Phytol. 2020, 227, 1001–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Wigchert, S.; Kuiper, E.; Boelhouwer, G.; Nefkens, G.; Verkleij, J.; Zwanenburg, B. Dose—Response of Seeds of the Parasitic Weeds Striga and Orobanche Toward the Synthetic Germination Stimulants GR24 and Nijmegen 1. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 1705–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jamil, M.; Wang, J.Y.; Yonli, D.; Patil, R.H.; Riyazaddin, M.; Gangashetty, P.; Berqdar, L.; Chen, G.-T.E.; Traore, H.; Margueritte, O.; et al. A New Formulation for Strigolactone Suicidal Germination Agents, Towards Successful Striga Management. Plants 2022, 11, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mangnus, E.M.; Dommerholt, F.J.; De Jong, R.L.; Zwanenburg, B. Improved Synthesis of Strigol Analog GR24 and Evaluation of the Biological Activity of its Diastereomers. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1992, 40, 1230–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jamil, M.; Charnikhova, T.; Houshyani, B.; van Ast, A.; Bouwmeester, H.J. Genetic Variation in Strigolactone Production and Tillering in Rice and its Effect on Striga hermonthica Infection. Planta 2012, 235, 473–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Jamil, M.; Kanampiu, F.K.; Karaya, H.; Charnikhova, T.; Bouwmeester, H.J. Striga hermonthica Parasitism in Maize in Response to N and P Fertilisers. Field Crop. Res. 2012, 134, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Braguy, J.; Ramazanova, M.; Giancola, S.; Jamil, M.; Kountche, B.A.; Zarban, R.A.Y.; Felemban, A.; Wang, J.Y.; Lin, P.-Y.; Haider, I.; et al. SeedQuant: A Deep Learning-Based Tool for Assessing Stimulant and Inhibitor Activity on Root Parasitic Seeds. Plant Physiol. 2021, 186, 1632–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, J.Y.; Jamil, M.; Lin, P.-Y.; Ota, T.; Fiorilli, V.; Novero, M.; Zarban, R.A.; Kountche, B.A.; Takahashi, I.; Martínez, C. Efficient Mimics for Elucidating Zaxinone Biology and Promoting Agricultura Applications. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1654–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Chemical structures of strigolactone analogs (A) MP3, (B) MP16, (C) Nijmegen-1, (D) GR24, and (E) strigol, a natural strigolactone.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of strigolactone analogs (A) MP3, (B) MP16, (C) Nijmegen-1, (D) GR24, and (E) strigol, a natural strigolactone.
Plants 11 01045 g001
Figure 2. Striga seed germination rate in response to MP3, MP16, Nijmegen-1, and GR24. Various concentrations (10−5–10−7 M) of selected SL analogs were applied to 10-day preconditioned Striga seeds. GR24 was used as a positive control and water as a negative control. For each SL analog, treatments with various letters differed significantly according to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.
Figure 2. Striga seed germination rate in response to MP3, MP16, Nijmegen-1, and GR24. Various concentrations (10−5–10−7 M) of selected SL analogs were applied to 10-day preconditioned Striga seeds. GR24 was used as a positive control and water as a negative control. For each SL analog, treatments with various letters differed significantly according to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.
Plants 11 01045 g002
Figure 3. Striga emergence in response to the application of various SL analogs in pots under greenhouse conditions. (A) Representative pots of greenhouse study, showing Striga emergence under different treatments. (B) Number of Striga plants that emerged in mock, MP3, MP16, or Nijmegen-1 treatment. The selected SL analogs were applied twice at a 1 μM concentration to 10-day preconditioned Striga-infested pots. (C) Rice plant height in response to different treatments. Data are means ± SE (n = 6). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Values in parenthesis show the percentage increase (+) or decrease (−) over mock treatment. For each SL analog, treatments with various asterisks differ significantly according to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.0005).
Figure 3. Striga emergence in response to the application of various SL analogs in pots under greenhouse conditions. (A) Representative pots of greenhouse study, showing Striga emergence under different treatments. (B) Number of Striga plants that emerged in mock, MP3, MP16, or Nijmegen-1 treatment. The selected SL analogs were applied twice at a 1 μM concentration to 10-day preconditioned Striga-infested pots. (C) Rice plant height in response to different treatments. Data are means ± SE (n = 6). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Values in parenthesis show the percentage increase (+) or decrease (−) over mock treatment. For each SL analog, treatments with various asterisks differ significantly according to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.0005).
Plants 11 01045 g003
Figure 4. Striga emergence in response to different SL analogs for a naturally infested pearl millet field in Burkina Faso. (A) Representative pearl millet plots of farmer’s field, showing Striga emergence under different treatments. (B) Number of Striga plants that emerged in pearl millet field under mock, MP3, MP16, or Nijmegen-1 treatment. (C) Pearl millet grain yield per plot. (D) Pearl millet stalk yield per plot. Data are means ± SE (n = 4). Values in parenthesis show the percentage increase (+) or decrease (−) over mock treatment.
Figure 4. Striga emergence in response to different SL analogs for a naturally infested pearl millet field in Burkina Faso. (A) Representative pearl millet plots of farmer’s field, showing Striga emergence under different treatments. (B) Number of Striga plants that emerged in pearl millet field under mock, MP3, MP16, or Nijmegen-1 treatment. (C) Pearl millet grain yield per plot. (D) Pearl millet stalk yield per plot. Data are means ± SE (n = 4). Values in parenthesis show the percentage increase (+) or decrease (−) over mock treatment.
Plants 11 01045 g004
Figure 5. Striga emergence in response to different SL analogs for a naturally infested sorghum field in Burkina Faso. (A) Representative sorghum plots of farmer field, showing Striga emergence under different treatments. (B) Number of Striga plants that emerged in sorghum field under mock, MP3, MP16, or Nijmegen-1 treatment. (C) Sorghum grain yield per plot. (D) Sorghum stalk yield per plot. Data are means ± SE (n = 4). Values in parenthesis are showing the percentage increase (+) or decrease (−) over mock treatment.
Figure 5. Striga emergence in response to different SL analogs for a naturally infested sorghum field in Burkina Faso. (A) Representative sorghum plots of farmer field, showing Striga emergence under different treatments. (B) Number of Striga plants that emerged in sorghum field under mock, MP3, MP16, or Nijmegen-1 treatment. (C) Sorghum grain yield per plot. (D) Sorghum stalk yield per plot. Data are means ± SE (n = 4). Values in parenthesis are showing the percentage increase (+) or decrease (−) over mock treatment.
Plants 11 01045 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jamil, M.; Wang, J.Y.; Yonli, D.; Ota, T.; Berqdar, L.; Traore, H.; Margueritte, O.; Zwanenburg, B.; Asami, T.; Al-Babili, S. Striga hermonthica Suicidal Germination Activity of Potent Strigolactone Analogs: Evaluation from Laboratory Bioassays to Field Trials. Plants 2022, 11, 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11081045

AMA Style

Jamil M, Wang JY, Yonli D, Ota T, Berqdar L, Traore H, Margueritte O, Zwanenburg B, Asami T, Al-Babili S. Striga hermonthica Suicidal Germination Activity of Potent Strigolactone Analogs: Evaluation from Laboratory Bioassays to Field Trials. Plants. 2022; 11(8):1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11081045

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jamil, Muhammad, Jian You Wang, Djibril Yonli, Tsuyoshi Ota, Lamis Berqdar, Hamidou Traore, Ouedraogo Margueritte, Binne Zwanenburg, Tadao Asami, and Salim Al-Babili. 2022. "Striga hermonthica Suicidal Germination Activity of Potent Strigolactone Analogs: Evaluation from Laboratory Bioassays to Field Trials" Plants 11, no. 8: 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11081045

APA Style

Jamil, M., Wang, J. Y., Yonli, D., Ota, T., Berqdar, L., Traore, H., Margueritte, O., Zwanenburg, B., Asami, T., & Al-Babili, S. (2022). Striga hermonthica Suicidal Germination Activity of Potent Strigolactone Analogs: Evaluation from Laboratory Bioassays to Field Trials. Plants, 11(8), 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11081045

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop