Next Article in Journal
Effect of Zinc Excess in Substrate on Physiological Responses of Sinapis alba L.
Next Article in Special Issue
Duckweeds for Phytoremediation of Polluted Water
Previous Article in Journal
Cell Division and Meristem Dynamics in Fern Gametophytes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Microplastic Contamination on the Aquatic Plant Lemna minuta (Least Duckweed)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ammonium Uptake, Mediated by Ammonium Transporters, Mitigates Manganese Toxicity in Duckweed, Spirodela polyrhiza

by
Olena Kishchenko
1,2,3,†,
Anton Stepanenko
1,2,3,†,
Tatsiana Straub
4,†,
Yuzhen Zhou
1,
Benjamin Neuhäuser
4,* and
Nikolai Borisjuk
1,*
1
Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Eco-Agricultural Biotechnology around Hongze Lake, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Centre of Regional Modern Agriculture and Environmental Protection, Huaiyin Normal University, West Changjiang Road 111, Huai’an 223000, China
2
Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), 06466 Gatersleben, Germany
3
Institute of Cell Biology and Genetic Engineering, National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Acad. Zabolotnogo Str. 148, 03143 Kyiv, Ukraine
4
Institute of Crop Science, Nutritional Crop Physiology, University of Hohenheim, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2023, 12(1), 208; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010208
Submission received: 14 November 2022 / Revised: 27 December 2022 / Accepted: 30 December 2022 / Published: 3 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Duckweed: Research Meets Applications)

Abstract

:
Nitrogen is an essential nutrient that affects all aspects of the growth, development and metabolic responses of plants. Here we investigated the influence of the two major sources of inorganic nitrogen, nitrate and ammonium, on the toxicity caused by excess of Mn in great duckweed, Spirodela polyrhiza. The revealed alleviating effect of ammonium on Mn-mediated toxicity, was complemented by detailed molecular, biochemical and evolutionary characterization of the species ammonium transporters (AMTs). Four genes encoding AMTs in S. polyrhiza, were classified as SpAMT1;1, SpAMT1;2, SpAMT1;3 and SpAMT2. Functional testing of the expressed proteins in yeast and Xenopus oocytes clearly demonstrated activity of SpAMT1;1 and SpAMT1;3 in transporting ammonium. Transcripts of all SpAMT genes were detected in duckweed fronds grown in cultivation medium, containing a physiological or 50-fold elevated concentration of Mn at the background of nitrogen or a mixture of nitrate and ammonium. Each gene demonstrated an individual expression pattern, revealed by RT-qPCR. Revealing the mitigating effect of ammonium uptake on manganese toxicity in aquatic duckweed S. polyrhiza, the study presents a comprehensive analysis of the transporters involved in the uptake of ammonium, shedding a new light on the interactions between the mechanisms of heavy metal toxicity and the regulation of the plant nitrogen metabolism.

1. Introduction

Together with carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, nitrogen (N) is an essential nutrient that affects all aspects of the growth, development and metabolic responses of plants [1,2,3]. Nitrate ( NO 3 ) and ammonium ( NH 4 + ) are the two major forms of N supply for plants [4]. With different plant species demonstrating preferences for either nitrate or ammonium as a preferential source of nitrogen [5,6,7,8,9], many studies revealed the dependence between nitrogen resource and the plants’ responses to stresses [10,11]. A number of studies also demonstrated that the form of supplied nitrogen affects the response of different plant species to stress caused by heavy metals such as aluminum, cadmium, copper, iron or mercury [12,13,14,15,16].
For example, the alleviating effect of NH 4 +   compared to NO 3 related to Al [15,17] and Cd toxicity [16] has been demonstrated in rice and wheat [18]. Similarly, increasing the ratio of NH 4 +   to NO 3 slowed down Cd absorption and reduce Cd toxicity in tomato [19]. Ammonium was demonstrated to interact with iron homeostasis in Brachypodium [20], and alleviate iron deficiency in rice [21]. The NO 3 / NH 4 +   ration influenced copper phytoextraction causing oxidative stress, and activating the antioxidant system in Tanzania guinea grass [22].
Manganese (Mn) plays a crucial role as a cofactor for numerous key enzymes [23] in all living organisms and occurs naturally in soil, sediment, air borne particulates and at relatively low levels in water reservoirs. It is of special importance for plants, where it is required for proper functioning and oxygen generation by photosystem II [24]. Despite its importance, Mn is required in relatively low amounts, usually between 20 and 40 µg/kg of the crop’s dry biomass [11,23]. Deficiency of Mn may cause inhibition of growth, reduction in biomass [25] and could result in tissue necrosis due to decrease in Mn-dependent superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) and corresponding increase in free oxygen radicals [26]. On the other hand, excessive levels of Mn may be toxic for green vegetation. Plants are able to accumulate Mn in great access [27], which could lead to the Mn toxicity, usually manifested by symptoms of chlorosis, necrosis, deformation of young leaves [28,29] and characteristic brown spots on mature leaves [30]. High concentrations of this microelement can also prevent the uptake and translocation of other essential elements such as Ca, Mg and Fe inducing their deficiencies which is considered as an explanation for the inhibition of chlorophyll biosynthesis and growth [31,32]. Moreover, modern human activities such as mining, metal smelting and the application of fertilizers and fungicides to agricultural land have raised the Mn content in soil, sediments and groundwater [33,34,35,36]. These developments pollute the environment, negatively affect ecosystems and lead to accumulation of Mn in the food chain [37,38].
Duckweeds are a group of small fast growing aquatic plants, attracting increasing interest of the scientific community not only as a new model plant for various physiological, biochemical and molecular research [39], but also as a source of viable biomass [40] and a plant of choice for wastewater phytoremediation of many heavy metals [41]. Similar to rice growing on paddy fields [5,7], aquatic duckweeds have clear bias for ammonium as a source of nitrogen when given a choice between ammonium and nitrate [42]. In our previous study [43], we have demonstrated that great duckweed, Spirodela polyrhiza, is sensible to Mn toxicity and manifests characteristic symptoms of Mn stress when concentrations of Mn exceed 40 mg/L (0.73 mM).
In this study, we analysed the effects of 50-fold excessed Mn on various growth parameters of S. polyrhiza at the background of different combinations of NO 3   and NH 4 + . The revealed physiological characteristics of biomass accumulation, N consumption and changes in cultivation medium pH, were related to comprehensive characterization of the molecular and biochemical properties of the four ammonium transporters SpAMT1;1, SpAMT1;2, SpAMT1;3 and SpAMT2, considered as the major entry pathways for NH 4 + uptake.

2. Results

2.1. Parameters of the Experimental System: Dynamics of Biomass Accumulation, Nitrogen Uptake, Changes in Medium pH, during 12-Days of Duckweed Cultivation

The effects of Mn at 2.95 mM MnSO 4 , 50-fold higher compared to the routinely used concentration in SH duckweed cultivation medium, were evaluated in dependence of two sources of inorganic nitrogen, supplied in form of nitrate (5 mM KNO 3 ) or a mixture of nitrate and ammonium (2.5 mM KNO 3 plus 2.5 mM NH 4 H 2 PO 4 ) during 12 days. No significant differences either in the biomass accumulation or plant appearance were observed up to four days of cultivation. However, by day 12 we observed significant, almost two-fold reduction in S. polyrhiza biomass accumulation in a medium supplied with nitrate and high Mn (N-Mn50) compared to nitrate medium with usual concentration of Mn (N-Mn1). Simultaneously, almost no difference in biomass accumulation was registered between duckweed grown on a mixture of nitrate and ammonium supplied with high (M-Mn50) of normal (M-Mn1) amounts of Mn (Figure 1).
Suppression of biomass accumulation in the N-Mn50 medium was accompanied by severe chlorosis and death of whole duckweed fronds profoundly manifested at day 12. To the contrary, after 12 days cultivation, duckweed grown in the medium supplied with NH 4 + (M-Mn50), mostly remained green with partial local browning of frond apexes, but no total chlorosis observed. In course of duckweed growth, the relevant changes in media such as consumption of nitrogen and pH have been monitored (Figure 1).
The dynamics of NO 3 consumption by S. polyrhiza growing on N-Mn1 and N-Mn50 media were pretty similar, with the available nitrogen reduced by about a half by day 12. Duckweed cultivated in the media containing both NO 3 and NH 4 + (M-Mn1 and M-Mn50) preferentially utilized ammonium, with nitrate almost untouched in the M-Mn50 and only slightly consumed in M-Mn1 by day 12 (Figure 1C).
During the growth period, we observed contrasting dynamics of medium acidity between medium containing NO 3 , as a soul source of nitrogen and a mixture of NO 3 and NH 4 + . The original medium pH of 5.8 climbed up to 7.01–7.18 in the medium supplied with nitrate, whereas the pH gradually dropped to 3.94–4.02 on day 12 in the medium containing both nitrate and ammonium. There were no differences in pH dynamics in the pairs of media containing usual or high concentration of Mn, N-Mn1 and N-Mn50 or M-Mn1 and M-Mn50 (Figure 1D).

2.2. Genome of S. polyrhiza Containes Four Genes Coding for Ammonium Transporters

A blast search on the S. polyrhiza genome (ecotype Sp9509 [44]), available on the NCBI website (taxid: 29656, GCA_900492545.1), using the protein sequences of rice ammonium transporters in the queries revealed four genes potentially encoding ammonium transporters SpAMT1;1, SpAMT1;2, SpAMT1;3 and SpAMT2. The exon/intron structures of the gene sequences were deduced by their similarities with the corresponding rice sequences, showing three intron-free genes belonging to the AMT1 subfamily and only SpAMT2 containing two short introns. A similar arrangement of the AMT genes has been revealed also for the second species in the genus Spirodela, S. intermedia (Figure S1) by using BLAST against the corresponding genome at the NCBI website (taxid: 51605). To validate the sequences available in the GenBank, we sequenced the amplification products for the four SpAMTs derived from cDNA of ecotype NB5548 used in this study (the corresponding sequence accession numbers are: OP730321, OP730322, OP730323 and OP730324).
Analysis of the deduced polypeptide sequences using InterPro software (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/ accessed on 10 September 2022) revealed structural organization typical for ammonium transmembrane transporters with characteristic N-terminal non-cytoplasmic domains of different length (53 and 50aa for SpAMT1;1 and SpAMT1;2, and 15 and 23aa for SpAMT1;3 and SpAMT2) and cytoplasmic C-terminal domains ranging from 51aa for SpAMT1;3 to 62aa for SpAMT1;2 [45] (Figure S2).
Phylogenetic analysis of the deduced protein sequences showed that SpAMT1;1 and SpAMT1;2 are closely related to each other, clustering together with their homologues from S. intermedia and taro, Colocasia esculenta, a representative of Araceae, the sister family to Lemnaceae [46]. The sequences also demonstrate significant similarity to more remote monocotyledonous species (date palm, Phoenix dactylifera; Cocos, rice and wheat), as well as the representative of dicotyledonous, Arabidopsis thaliana (Figure 2). Similar phylogenetic distances relative to other monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous were revealed also for SpAMT1;3 and SpAMT2.

2.3. Functional Activity of the Ammonium Transporters in Yeast and Xenopus Oocytes Systems

To test general transport function of the identified potential SpAMTs we performed a complementation analysis by expressing the four duckweed ammonium transporter proteins from the pDR199 vector in a yeast strain deficient in AMT function (31019b, ΔΔΔmep; [49]). The yeast was grown on medium supplied with NH 4 + as a sole source of Nitrogen at two concentrations, 0.3 and 1 mM and three different pH: 4.5, 5.5 and 6.5 (Figure 3). The highest complementation activity in all experimental settings, demonstrated the duckweed ammonium transporter SpAMT1;3, followed by the SpAMT1;1. The complementation efficiency of SpAMT1;3 was comparable to that of Arabidopsis AtAMT1;1, with the activity of SpAMT1;1 resembling that of AtAMT2. We were not able to detect any complementing activity of SpAMT1;2. The SpAMT2 showed some activity slightly above the pDR199 control only at 1 mM concentration of NH 4 + and medium pH 6.5. In general, there was no pH effect on any of the transporters. When grown on 60 mM methylammonia (MeA), a toxic analog of NH 4 + , the active transporters conferred transport activity of MeA as well, which led to strongly reduced yeast growth.
To analyse the two functional duckweed AMTs in more detail, the proteins were expressed in Xenopus leavis oocytes and the ammonium induced currents where recorded by two electrode voltage clamp. Ammonium induced significant inward currents in the oocytes expressing SpAMT1;1 and SpAMT1;3 (Figure 4). As expected, the currents increased with more negative membrane potential (Figure 4A). Total currents by SpAMT1;3 were in the low nano ampere range and increased with increasing ammonium concentration with a low affinity Km = 5.4 mM. The SpAMT1;1 mediated currents were about three times higher than the currents by SpAMT1;3 (Figure 4B) and saturated with a high affinity Km = 116 µM tipical for plant AMTs (Figure 4C). No currect induction was detected in the oocytes transfected with SpAMT1;2 or SpAMT2 (data not shown). Based on the obtained results, we can characterise SpAMT1;1 as a tipical high affinity plant ammonium transporter while SpAMT1;3 showed uncommon low affinity for ammonium.

2.4. Expression Profiling of S. polyrhiza AMT Genes by qRT-PCR

The expression of the SpAMT genes was evaluated at the growth stage following 4 days of cultivation in the four media formulations mentioned above, using the primers represented in Table S1 according a previously described RT-qPCR protocol [42]. All RT-qPCR reactions were performed in triplicate, normalized against the expression of two housekeeping genes (β-actin and histone H3), and normalized to the gene expression levels at the starting point (SP). The expression of S. polyrhiza genes encoding AMT1;1 and AMT1;3, which demonstrated clear activity in oocytes and yeast tests, showed a complex and distinct regulation by Mn and the source of nitrogen. Adding of nitrogen in form of NO 3   at the background of physiological concentration of Mn (N-Mn1) led to a slight activation of both SpAMT1;1 and SpAMT1;3, whereas a mixture of NO 3   and NH 4 + stimulated expression of SpAMT1;3 but did not SpAMT1;1 (Figure 5). The 50-fold elevated concentration of Mn affected the expression of SpAMT1;1 and SpAMT1;3 in opposite directions, enhancing SpAMT1;1 and suppressing SpAMT1;3, with these effects manifested much stronger in the presence of nitrate as a sole source of N, N-Mn50, compared to nitrate and ammonium mixture, M-Mn50.
The expression of SpAMT1;2, was downregulated in all experimental samples compared to SP. On the contrary, SpAMT2, which similar to SpAMT1;2, did not show a function either in oocyte or in the yeast test, demonstrated a 3.3-fold increased level of transcripts in the N-Mn50 sample, while expression was downregulated both in the M-Mn1 and the M-Mn50 samples compared to the starting point.

2.5. Regulatory Cis-Elements in the Promoters of Spirodela AMT Genes

To get further insights into the expression regulation of S. polyrhiza AMT genes, we conducted an in silico analysis of cis-elements in the gene promoters. The 1.5 kb long promoter sequences upstream from the protein translation starts, extracted from the available online genome sequence, version 3 of S. polyrhiza, strain 9509 (GCA_900492545.1) were analyzed using the New Place promoter analysis software (https://www.dna.affrc.go.jp/PLACE, accessed on 7 October 2022) [50]. In parallel, we conducted a similar analysis of corresponding gene promoters in a recently published genome of S. intermedia (taxid: 51605) a closely related duckweed species, with the aim to further highlight the evolutionary conserved regulatory elements (Figure 6).
A prominent structural feature revealed in all analyzed promoters, was the abundant presence of GAGA motifs or its complement CTCT, involved in regulation of eukaryotic genomes through chromatin modulations [51,52,53]. Especially intriguing is the presence of a more than 50 bp long GAGA stretch in promoters of AMT1;1 gene of S. polyrhiza and S. intermedia, closely adjacent to the ATG of protein translation start. Within the first 500 bp upstream of the translation start, all analyzed promoters feature one (AMT1;1 and AMT1;3) or multiple (AMT1;2 and AMT2) TATA motifs. The TATA-box is recognized as binding sites for a basic transcription factor TBP (TATA box-binding protein) involved in transcription initiation of many eukaryotic genes [54]. Moreover, inside 500 bp proximity to the ATG, all AMT1 genes promoters contain general eukaryotic cis-element CCAAT-box [55] a target for transcription complex NF-Y (Nuclear Factor Y), which plays an essential role in many processes related to plant development, productivity and stress responses [56,57]. The SpAMT2 and SiAMT2 promoters have multiple CCAAT sites located between −1000 and −500 bp relating to the first ATG.
Transcription factors IDD (Indeterminate Domain) and DOF (DNA binding with one finger) were shown to be involved in regulation of the AMT genes in a number of different plants [58]. We located the recognition site for IDD, with the signature ACAAA, within the first 500 bp at the identical positions in the AMT2 promoters of both S. polyrhiza and S. intermedia. In the promoters of the AMT1 genes the site is scattered at various locations more remote from the translation start. As for the DNA motif recognized by DOF, T/AAAAG, multiple copies are found within the first 500 bp of all AMT1 promoters, as well as scattered at more distant locations in promoters of both AMT1 and AMT2 genes.
The members of the NIGT1 (Nitrate-Inducible GARP-Type Transcriptional Repressor-1) subfamily in the superfamily of GARP transcription factors [59], participate in fine-tuning of gene expression in response to the plant nitrogen and phosphorus status [60]. The proteins bind to two types of cis-elements, GAATC and GAATATTC demonstrating dual modes of promoter recognition [61,62]. The GAATATTC site has been identified only in the AMT2 promoters of S. polyrhiza and S. intermedia about 550 bp upstream of the first ATG, while the GAATC recognition site was located along the sequence of all promoters with the highest representation in the promoters of AMT1;2 and AMT2 genes.

3. Discussion

Our previous study demonstrated that the extend on Mn toxicity in four aquatic species of duckweed (Lemnaceae) depends on the source and concentration of nitrogen in the cultivation medium [43]. In particular, in great duckweed, Spirodela polyrhiza, the first characteristic symptoms of Mn stress appeared in form of characteristic brown spots when concentration of Mn was 40 mg/L (0.73 mM); however, the symptoms were largely reduced by the presence of ammonium in the medium in addition to nitrate. This observation, together with (i) increasing pollution of water resources with heavy metals [34,35,36,37], (ii) multiple previous reports linking the level of toxicity caused by various heavy metals to the nitrogen metabolism [12,13,14,15,16] and (iii) availability of the solid set of data on whole Spirodela genome sequences [45,63,64], encouraged us to take a closer look at Mn toxicity in S. polyrhiza in relation to the source of inorganic nitrogen with a special attention on the species’s ammonium transporters (AMTs).

3.1. N H 4 + Alleviated Mn Stress Symptoms for S. polyrhiza Compared with N O 3

Monitoring of S. polyrhiza fronds cultivated in the medium containing either a basic (0.059 mM) or 50-fold elevated (2.95 mM) concentration of Mn revealed profoundly different growth outcome, depending on the nitrogen source. Duckweed grown in the medium with basic Mn supplemented with NO 3 , as a sole nitrogen source (N-Mn1), looked perfectly healthy and produced higher biomass compared to the medium with a mixture of a 50% of NO 3 and 50% of NH 4 + (Figure 1A). This observation is in accordance with the previously published data showing that growth rate of two duckweed species, S. polyrrhiza and Lemna aequinoctialis was lower in the medium containing ammonia compared to the medium with nitrate [65]. In addition to reduced biomass, selected fronds in the M-Mn1 medium showed some signs of chlorosis. These symptoms can be attributed to general ammonium toxicity [29,30,31], which we also observed in our previous study on six duckweed species, including S. polyrhiza [42].
The picture dramatically changed when the cultivation medium was supplied with elevated Mn. The fronds’ appearance and biomass accumulation remained practically the same for duckweed in the medium with mixture of NO 3 - and NH 4 + (M-Mn50) compared to M-Mn1, except of occasional brown spots characteristic for Mn-mediated stress. In contrast, duckweed cultivated in the N-Mn50 medium with NO 3 as a sole N source, manifests severe senescence, probably even death, and significant reduction in biomass accumulation compared not only to the N-Mn1 medium, but also to duckweed grown in medium containing the mixture of NO 3 and NH 4 + supplied with either normal (M-Mn1) or high concentration of Mn (M-Mn50). It is worth to notice that high concentration of Mn had no effect on the dynamics of NO 3 and NH 4 + uptake or the dynamics of pH during the cultivation period (Figure 1C,D). Confirming our previous study [42], utilization of NO 3 led to a pH increase in the medium, whereas the uptake of NH 4 + resulted in acidification of the nutrient medium, as has been shown earlier for a number of plants [42,66,67].
The lowering of pH in the media containing NH 4 + might be a part of the mechanism of the observed alleviation of Mn toxicity mediated by NH 4 + in S. polyrhiza. For example, NH 4 + was shown to alleviate Mn stress symptoms in spruce and rice [68,69], and the decrease in Mn uptake by medium acidification was proposed as a mechanism underlying this phenomenon [69]. pH sensitivity has been reported as a general feature of transmembrane solute movement [70] as well as for many kinds of specific transporters in different organisms [71,72,73,74]. The reported data demonstrate that conformation and functionality of the plant transmembrane transporters are dependent upon cellular and intercellular pH. Dependence on pH, is especially well established in relation to the activity of aquaporins [75,76]. Aquaporins represent a large family of plant proteins with members in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana [77] responsible not only for the plants water homeostasis, but for transporting many other molecules including ammonia and other small solutes [78]. Amounting evidence from across phyla suggests that some aquaporin types act as ion channels, and are modulated by divalent cations such as Ca 2 + and Cd 2 + [79]). Moreover, in Arabidopsis, in addition to pH, manganese was identified as potent inhibitors of aquaporin AtPIP2;1 [80].
In order to check the possibility that aquaporins could contribute to Mn stress in our system by responding to Mn and/or ammonium/pH, we have tested expression of two duckweed homologues of Arabidopsis aquaporins, SpTIP2;1 and SpPIP2;2 by quantitative RT-qPCR (Figure 7, Table S1). Indeed, both genes showed differential expression in response to the applied experimental conditions. The SpTIP2;1 was significantly suppressed in the N-Mn50 environment but slightly upregulated in the M-Mn1 and M-Mn50, whereas SpPIP2;2 was upregulated in all experimental medium, especially in the medium containing NH 4 +   (M-Mn1 and M-Mn50).
We can assume that the acidification of the cultivation media and probably Mn itself may inactivate the transporters supporting inward Mn transport into the cytosol and lead to Mn exclusion from plant tissues. The presented data on differential expression of aquaporins may pave a way for future research in this area.

3.2. Ammonium Transporter (AMT) Genes in the Genome of S. polyrhiza

Ammonium transporters (AMTs) are transmembrane proteins, usually consisting of a N-terminal non-cytoplasmic domain, 11 transmembrane helices and C-terminal cytoplasmic domain [81,82], responsible for transporting NH 4 +   from the outside into the inside of the cell. Intensive studies on AMTs from different plant species revealed that this protein family is divided into two distinct subfamilies, the AMT1 and the AMT2, represented by different number of members in different species [58,83]. Compared to other plants, S. polyrhiza contains fewer genes coding for the AMTs. For example, Arabidopsis thaliana has five genes coding for AMT1 variants and one gene for AMT2 [83], and rice has three members of the AMT1 subfamily [84] and nine representatives of AMT2 [85]. Our analysis of the S. polyrhiza genome revealed three variants of AMT1: SpAMT1;1, SpAMT1;2, SpAMT1;3 and a single SpAMT2, all encoded by single copy genes located on different chromosomes. This finding further illustrates the reduced number of protein-coding genes in S. polyrhiza originally observed by the first genome sequencing [63], where a 28% reduction in genes compared to Arabidopsis thaliana and 50% reduction compared to rice was shown. This was later confirmed by Michael et al. (2017) [45] showing that most gene families in Spirodela have less members as compared with the model dicotyledonous plant Arabidopsis and monocotyledonous Brachypodium. Sequence analysis of the cloned cDNA from the Chinese ecotype NB5548 shows very high homology to the corresponding sequences of European ecotype 9509 (BlastN GCA_900492545.1) at the level of 99.6–99.8% similarity, with just a few observed C↔T or G↔A substitutes in the 1500 bp long sequences of the three SpAMT1 genes, and 100% similarity for SpAMT2. This level of sequence conservation between ecotypes of S. polyrhiza is in a good agreement with the previously postulated extremely low rate of mutations revealed by comparing genomes of 68 worldwide geographic ecotypes of this species [86]. The SpAMT gene sequences also show similar arrangement, no introns in all three AMT1 gene sequences, two short introns within the AMT2 gene, and 95–97% sequences similarities with their homologues in the genome of the closely related S. intermedia [64], as represented in Figure S1.
The deduced SpAMT protein sequences demonstrate most close phylogenetic relationship to their counterparts from S. intermedia, followed by taro, Colocasia esculenta [87], a plant species which belongs to the group of early-branching monocotyledonous family Araceae [88], a sister family to Lemnaceae [46]. The SpAMT proteins also demonstrate significant levels of similarity to the homologues from other monocotyledonous banana, cocos, oil palm, rice and wheat, as well as dicotyledonous Arabidopsis (Figure 2), stressing strong evolutionary conservation of this important protein family along the plants [83,89]. Among S. polyrhiza AMTs, SpAMT1;1 and SpAMT1;2 share the highest homology, whereas the two proteins have certain differences in their C-termini (Figure S2). This offers possibilities for differential post-translational regulation since the proteins’ C-terminal domain was reported as a target for environmental regulation through phosphorylation by protein kinases [82,90,91,92].

3.3. SpAMT1;1 and SpAMT1;3 Demonstrate Clear Activity in Yeast and Oocytes

From the four SpAMT proteins expressed in yeast and Xenopus oocytes, SpAMT1;1 and SpAMT1;3 demonstrated highly specific activity in parallel with the Arabidopsis controls (Figure 3). Interestingly, the homologues of these transporters in Arabidopsis, AtAMT1;1 and AtAMT1;3, have been reported for conferring 60% of total ammonium uptake combined [93,94]. To the contrary, SpAMT1;2 showed no activity in all of the experimental conditions and SpAMT2 was slightly activated at elevated pH in yeast complementation test. One might ponder about the silence of the SpAMT1;2, considering its phylogenetic closeness with the SpAMT1;1 (Figure 2) which shows a quite good activity in transporting NH 4 + . However, when looking on the structure of both proteins in more details, one can see that despite a high homology of the transmembrane part in the middle of the proteins, the non-cytoplasmic N-termini domains and the cytoplasmic C-termini domains show significant differences (Figure S2). For example, specific mutations of a conserved Gly in this domain was shown to inactivate AMTs from yeast and plants [49,95]. The mentioned mutation, however, cannot explain the functional differences between SpAMT1;1 and SpAMT1;2. The Gly is intact within the conserved first half of the C-terminal domain in both proteins. Another well-documented option of AMT regulation, is by post-translational phosphorylation of the Thr, located 4 residues downstream of the above mentioned Gly [96]. This position also does not differ between SpAMT1;1 and SpAMT1;2, as evident from the protein alignment in Figure S2. However, additional Thr residues uniquely positioned within both N-terminal and C-terminal domains of SpAMT1;2 (Figure S2), offer an opportunity of differential regulation of this protein compared to SpAMT1;1, through phosphorylation. These suggestions are purely speculative at the moment, and require an experimental verification.

3.4. The Four S. polyrhiza AMT Genes Show Different Expression Patterns in Response to Nitrogen Source and Mn

Our data show that both nitrogen source and elevated concentration of Mn affect expression of each of the SpAMT genes in a unique and in some instances opposite direction under the applied experimental conditions (Figure 3). Although NO 3 slightly stimulated expression of SpAMT1;1 and SpAMT1;3, it downregulated SpAMT1;2 and SpAMT2. NH 4 + was rather neutral on SpAMT1;1, upregulated SpAMT1;3 and downregulated SpAMT1;2 and SpAMT2. The revealed wide spectrum of SpAMT gene expression patterns in response to nitrogen is not too surprising. It is well in line with multiple previous reports showing diversity of AMT responses in other species such as Arabidopsis [97], rice [98], maize [99], poplar [14,100], apple [101] or tobacco [102]. The availability of multiple AMT genes with individual expression patterns, and multiple capacity of the expressed transporters for NH 4 + uptake is considered to provide plants with great flexibility to respond differentially to varying environmental and nutritional conditions by fine tuning gene expression.
Simultaneous, presence of high concentrations of Mn in the cultivation media containing nitrate, N-Mn50, or a mixture of nitrate and ammonium, M-Mn50, dramatically changes the expression of SpAMT genes compared to the media with physiological concentration of Mn, N-Mn1 and M-Mn1. Thus, we observed drastic increase in expression of SpAMT1;1 and SpAMT2 in the medium containing NO 3 as a sole source of nitrogen, N-Mn50, whereas the increase in the M-Mn50 medium was rather mild (Figure 5). Based on this specific expression dynamics, we are inclined to explain the observed expression boost not by direct influence of Mn, but rather by the process of senescence started by Mn toxicity and manifested in fronds cultivated in the N-Mn50 to a significantly greater extend, compared to the duckweed grown in the M-Mn50 (Figure 1). Observations in other plants, showing upregulation of the SpAMT1;1 and SpAMT2 homologues in old tissues, suggesting the role of these proteins in nitrogen remobilization [103], might be used in support of this notion. For example, van der Graaff et al., (2006) [104] revealed enhanced expression of AtAMT1.1 in senescing leaves of Arabidopsis, and more recently, Liu et al., (2018) [102] showed that of nine AMT transporter genes identified in tobacco, only two, NtAMT1.1 and NtAMT2.1, were strongly expressed in the old leaves, implying their dominant roles in N remobilization from senescent tissues.
Contrary to SpAMT1;1 and SpAMT2, expression of the SpAMT1;2 and SpAMT1.3 seems to be influenced by Mn in a more direct manner. High Mn concentration suppressed expression of both genes independent of the: (i) supplied nitrogen formulation, N-Mn50 or M-Mn50 as, respectively, compared with N-Mn1 or M-Mn1 (Figure 5) and (ii) the differences in the acidity of the cultivation medium, correspondingly pH~6.5 for N-Mn1 and N-Mn50 and pH~ 4.0 for M-Mn1 and M-Mn50 (Figure 1). The question whether expression of SpAMT1;2 and SpAMT1.3 is directly controlled by Mn or through some Mn-mediated physiological changes such as hormonal status, generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), or some other signaling pathway remains to be investigated.

3.5. Distinctive Promoter Elements in the AMT Genes in S. polyrhiza

Many environmental and physiological factors, nitrogen status, soil pH, photoperiod, developmental stage [58], have been recognized to influence ammonium transporter expression in plants. These factors regulate expression of AMT genes primarily via interaction of various transcription factors with specific cis-elements in the promoter of the genes [55]. Our analysis of AMT gene promoters in Spirodela, revealed characteristic cis-element patterns which might affect transcriptional regulation of ammonium uptake, and are distinctive from the genes encoding major nitrogen assimilation genes responsible to both NO 3 and NH 4 + [42].
The promoters of AMT genes are populated by (GA/CT)n repeats (Figure 6), targets for GAGA/TCTC-binding transcription factors (GAFs). Abundance of the GAGA in the promoters is not very surprising, considering that genomes of both S. polyrhiza and S. intermedia, are un-proportionally enriched in these motifs [45,64]. However, the contrast in distribution of the sequences in AMTs and nitrogen assimilation genes promoters is noticeable. In the analyzed AMT promoters, relatively short GAGA-stretches are more or less evenly distributed along the 1.5 kb length of the promoter, with a unique ~50 bp GAGA-stretch located just upstream of the ATG in the AMT1;1 promoter (Figure 6), whereas in most of the promoters of nitrogen assimilation genes the (GA/CT)n repeats are represented by long stretches located outside of the 500 bp region adjacent to the genes’ translation start.
Among prominent conservative cis-elements present within the 500 bp region upstream of translation start in all analyzed Spirodela AMTs are the TATA-box, a binding site for the general eukaryotic transcription factor TBP [54]. All AMT promoters also contain another general eukaryotic cis-element CCAAT-box [55], a binding site for NF-Y (nuclear factor Y) [105], involved in many important growth and developmental processes [106], including stress and hormone responses [107,108].
Overall, the range of cis-elements revealed in the Sprirodela AMT genes promoters in combination with the wide selection of corresponding transcription factors provide huge flexibility to regulate the AMT transcripts in response to various developmental, environmental and nutritional challenges faced by a plant during the life span.

4. Summary

Here we showed that the toxicity of manganese in duckweed plants could be mitigated by addition of ammonium as a nitrogen source. This mitigation effect might be pH related since the preferential uptake of ammonium by S. polyrhiza resulted in a pH decrease in the media which in turn might lead to a decreased activity of Mn uptake transporters e.g., aquaporins. The uptake of ammonium from the media could be mediated by four SpAMT proteins. The expression of the AMT genes was uniquely regulated by Mn and the available nitrogen source and two of the AMT proteins showed strong activity in heterologous systems. Their interesting unique transcriptional regulation is orchestrated by multiple transcription factor binding sites in the AMT promoters. The exact mechanism of Mn resistance by ammonium as well as the identification of transcription factors involved in SpAMT regulation are interesting questions which should be addressed in future studies.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Plant Material

The S. polyrhiza ecotype (collection ID: NB5548) used in this study was selected from the duckweed live in vitro collection recently established in the School of Life Sciences at Huaiyin Normal University, Huai’an, China. The NB5548 ecotype was originally collected in fall 2017 (N 33″17′40; E 118″49′45), surface sterilized and propagate on solid agar medium supplemented with SH salts [109] under sterile conditions.

5.2. Duckweed Cultivation Parameters

To accumulate biomass, duckweed plants grown on solid agar medium were initially transferred into 200 mL sterile liquid SH medium supplemented with 5 g/l sucrose contained in 500-mL flasks and cultivated at 23 ± 1 °C with a photon flux density of 50–60 μmol·m−2s−1 provided by cool white fluorescent bulbs in a 16-h light/8-h dark cycle. After four weeks of growth, the accumulated fronds were washed 3 times with autoclaved water, and 200 mL sterile N- and sugar-free basal salt SH medium was added. After 3 days cultivation, 0.5-g portions were blotted and weighed in aseptic condition and then inoculated into 100-mL flasks containing 60 mL of autoclaved basic SH medium (no sugar) supplemented with two different formulations of N (N and M) and two concentrations of MnSO 4 (0.059 mM or 2.95 mM), namely N-Mn1, N-Mn50, M-Mn1 and M-Mn50. The basic medium labeled Mn1 contained 0.059 mM Mn that correspondent to SH medium formula, whereas experimental medium Mn50 contained 50-fold elevated concentration of Mn (2.95 mM). The media N-Mn1 and N-Mn50 contained NO 3   as the sole N source (5 mM KNO 3 , with 5 mM KH 2 PO 4 replacing NH 4 H 2 PO 4 of the standard SH medium), and the media M-Mn1 and M-Mn50 had a mixture of NO 3 and NH 4 + (2.5 mM KNO 3 , 2.5 mM KH 2 PO 4 , 2.5 mM NH 4 H 2 PO 4 and 2.5 mM K 2 SO 4 ). The medium pH was adjusted to 5.5 and autoclaved. In total, 18 flasks with growing duckweed have been prepared for every variant of tested media. Three flasks (as 3 independent biological repeats) were randomly taken after 4 and 12 days for each of the analyses (RNA isolation for RT-qPCR, biomass measurement, determination of the total concentration of N). The duckweed biomass was also collected at the starting point (designated as SP), which corresponds to the moment before washing and 3-days cultivation on a medium containing no nitrogen (starvation).

5.3. Determination of N Concentration

The total nitrogen concentration was determined using standard alkaline potassium persulfate digestion followed by UV spectrophotometry as previously described [110]. The NO 3 concentration in the growth media was measured spectrophotometrically as the difference in absorption between 220 and 275 nm [111]. The NH 4 + concentration in the growth media was measured calorimetrically using the Nessler method [112].

5.4. Cloning and Analysis of S. polyrhiza Genes Encoding Ammonium Transporters

The AMT1;1, AMT1;2, AMT1;3 and AMT2 genes were obtained by sequencing and cloning the PCR-amplified gene regions using cDNA prepared from local S. polyrhiza, ecotype NB5548, mRNA as a template. The PCR fragments were amplified with gene-specific primers designed according to the in silico sequence information available at NCBI (taxid: 29656, GCA_900492545.1) for S. polyrhiza, ecotype 9509. The generated DNA fragments, cloned into the vector pMD19 (Takara, Dalian, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions were custom sequenced (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China), and the obtained nucleotide sequences were analyzed using the CLC Main Workbench (Version 6.9.2, Qiagen) software. The specific primers used for gene amplification are listed in Table S2.

5.5. Phylogenetic Analysis

Protein sequences of AMT proteins were compared with a selection sequence available in public databases. The corresponding sequences available for monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous were extracted from the GenBank (National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accessed on 15 August 2022) by blasting with the S. polyrhiza sequences as a query. The maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees were constructed using NGPhylogeny webservice accessible through the https://ngphylogeny.fr [47] using MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment [113] and PhyML algorithm [114] with the Jones–Taylor–Thornton (JTT) model. Cleaning aligned sequences was made by utilizing BMGE tools [115]. Bootstrap support (BS) was estimated with 100 bootstrap replicates. iTOL (https://itol.embl.de) was used for displaying and annotating the generated phylogenetic trees [48].

5.6. Construction of Expression Vectors and Testing AMTs Functionality in Yeast and Xenopus oocytes

For testing in yeast and oocytes the coding sequences of SpAMP1;1, SpAMP1;2, SpAMP1;3 and SpAMP2 were cut out from the original plasmid pMD19 and ligated into the vector pDR199 for expression in yeast [82] or the oocyte expression vector pOO2 [116]. Following verification by sequencing, the resulting vectors pDR199-SpAMP1;1, pDR199-SpAMP1;2, pDR199-SpAMP1;3 and pDR199-SpAMP2 were introduced into the AMT-deficient yeast strain 31019b [49]. The complementation analysis was performed according to the earlier described procedure [81], using the pDR199 vector as negative control and the pDR199 featuring Arabidopsis thaliana genes AtAMT1;2 and AtAMT2 as positive controls. Correspondingly, the four S. polyrhiza AMT genes were fitted into the pOO2 vector, and the resulting expression cassettes were used to test the proteins’ abilities for transporting NH 4 + in the oocyte according to an earlier established protocol [92]. Oocytes were ordered at EcoCyte Bioscience (Castrop-Rauxel, Germany), selected, washed and injected with 50 nl of linearized cRNA (0.4 µg/µL) of SpAMTs. Oocytes were kept in ND96 for 3 days at 18 °C and then placed in a recording chamber containing the recording solution (in mM): 110 CholineCl, 2 CaCl 2 , MgCl 2 , 5 N-morpholinoethane sulfonate (MES), pH adjusted to 5.5 with Tris(hydroxymethyl) aminomethane (TRIS). Ammonium was added as Cl salts. Oocytes were impaled with 3 M KCl-filled glass capillaries of around 0.8 Mohm resistance connected to a two-electrode voltage clamp amplifier (Dagan CA-1). Transport was measured at an array of NH 4 + concentrations (10, 30, 100, 300, 1000, 3000 and 10,000 µM). Currents without ammonium were subtracted from currents with ammonium to give ammonium induced current.

5.7. Analysis of AMT Genes Expression in S. polyrhiza by RT-qPCR

After DNAase treatment, 600 ng of total RNA was reverse transcribed using Reverse Transcriptase cDNA synthesis kit (Takara, Beijing, China) following the manufacturer’s manual. The qPCR reactions were performed using CFX Connect Real-Time detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) using the UltraSybr Mixture (High Rox) supplied by CWBio (Taizhou, China). The cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, and 20 s at the annealing temperature of the respective primers (Table S1). The SYBR Green I fluorescence was monitored consecutively after the annealing step. The quality of products was checked by a thermal denaturation cycle. Only results providing a single peak were considered. The coefficient amplification efficiency for each pair of primers was determined by 10-fold serial dilutions. The level of relative expression was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method [117]. Expression data for the target genes were normalized using the average expression of two S. polyrhiza ecotype NB5548 housekeeping genes, histone H3 (GenBank ID: MZ605911) and β-actin (GenBank ID: MZ605912), according to the geNorm protocol [118]. Three replicates were performed for all samples. Normalized expression was estimated using the ΔΔCq algorithm All data were analyzed using the program BIO-RAD CFX Manager 3.1 (Bio-Rad, USA) and Microsoft Excel 2016 software.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12010208/s1, Figure S1: Schematic structure of AMT coding regions in genomes of S. polyrhiza and S. intermedia; Figure S2: Schematic structure of AMTs of S. polyrhiza; Figure S3: Sequence alignment of AMT1 proteins from S. polyrhiza and A. thaliana. Table S1: List of RT-qPCR primers used for evaluating expression of AMTs and aquaporin genes in S. polyrhiza line NB5548; Table S2: List of primer used for cloning AMT genes of S.polyrhiza ecotype NB5548.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.K., B.N. and N.B.; data curation and formal analysis, O.K., A.S., B.N. and N.B.; investigation and methodology, O.K., A.S., Y.Z. and T.S.; project administration, Y.Z., B.N. and N.B.; resources, Y.Z., B.N. and N.B.; software, O.K., A.S. and T.S.; supervision, O.K., B.N. and N.B.; validation, O.K., A.S. and T.S.; writing—original draft, O.K., A.S., B.N. and N.B.; writing—review and editing, B.N and N.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by an individual grant provided by the Huaiyin Normal University (Huai’an, China) to NB as well as general funding of BN by the University of Hohenheim (Stuttgart, Germany).

Data Availability Statement

GenBank accession numbers for Spirodela polyrhiza AMT genes are: SpAMT1;1—OP730321; SpAMT1;2—OP730322; SpAMT1;3—OP730323; SpAMT2—OP730324.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Scheible, W.-R.; Morcuende, R.; Czechowski, T.; Fritz, C.; Osuna, D.; Palacios-Rojas, N.; Schindelasch, D.; Thimm, O.; Udvardi, M.K.; Stitt, M. Genome-Wide Reprogramming of Primary and Secondary Metabolism, Protein Synthesis, Cellular Growth Processes, and the Regulatory Infrastructure of Arabidopsis in Response to Nitrogen. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136, 2483–2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Xu, G.; Fan, X.; Miller, A.J. Plant Nitrogen Assimilation and Use Efficiency. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 153–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Saloner, A.; Bernstein, N. Nitrogen Source Matters: High NH4/NO3 Ratio Reduces Cannabinoids, Terpenoids, and Yield in Medical Cannabis. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 830224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bloom, A.J. The Increasing Importance of Distinguishing among Plant Nitrogen Sources. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2015, 25, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, P.; Xu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Nie, T. “Preferential” Ammonium Uptake by Rice Does Not Always Turn into Higher N Recovery of Fertilizer Sources under Water-Saving Irrigation. Agric. Water Manag. 2022, 272, 107867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cui, J.; Yu, C.; Qiao, N.; Xu, X.; Tian, Y.; Ouyang, H. Plant Preference for NH4+ versus NO3 at Different Growth Stages in an Alpine Agroecosystem. Field Crops Res. 2017, 201, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Duan, Y.H.; Zhang, Y.L.; Ye, L.T.; Fan, X.R.; Xu, G.H.; Shen, Q.R. Responses of Rice Cultivars with Different Nitrogen Use Efficiency to Partial Nitrate Nutrition. Ann. Bot. 2007, 99, 1153–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hajari, E.; Snyman, S.J.; Watt, M.P. Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sugarcane (Saccharum Spp.) Varieties under in Vitro Conditions with Varied N Supply. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2015, 122, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Patterson, K.; Cakmak, T.; Cooper, A.; Lager, I.; Rasmusson, A.G.; Escobar, M.A. Distinct Signalling Pathways and Transcriptome Response Signatures Differentiate Ammonium- and Nitrate-Supplied Plants: Transcriptome Signatures of Ammonium and Nitrate Responses. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 1486–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Ding, L.; Lu, Z.; Gao, L.; Guo, S.; Shen, Q. Is Nitrogen a Key Determinant of Water Transport and Photosynthesis in Higher Plants Upon Drought Stress? Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jiang, W.Z. Mn Use Efficiency in Different Wheat Cultivars. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Carrasco-Gil, S.; Estebaranz-Yubero, M.; Medel-Cuesta, D.; Millán, R.; Hernández, L.E. Influence of Nitrate Fertilization on Hg Uptake and Oxidative Stress Parameters in Alfalfa Plants Cultivated in a Hg-Polluted Soil. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2012, 75, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Huo, K.; Shangguan, X.; Xia, Y.; Shen, Z.; Chen, C. Excess Copper Inhibits the Growth of Rice Seedlings by Decreasing Uptake of Nitrate. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 190, 110105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huang, J.; Wu, X.; Tian, F.; Chen, Q.; Luo, P.; Zhang, F.; Wan, X.; Zhong, Y.; Liu, Q.; Lin, T. Changes in Proteome and Protein Phosphorylation Reveal the Protective Roles of Exogenous Nitrogen in Alleviating Cadmium Toxicity in Poplar Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 21, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Zhao, X.Q.; Guo, S.W.; Shinmachi, F.; Sunairi, M.; Noguchi, A.; Hasegawa, I.; Shen, R.F. Aluminium Tolerance in Rice Is Antagonistic with Nitrate Preference and Synergistic with Ammonium Preference. Ann. Bot. 2013, 111, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Zhu, C.Q.; Cao, X.C.; Zhu, L.F.; Hu, W.J.; Hu, A.Y.; Bai, Z.G.; Zhong, C.; Sun, L.M.; Liang, Q.D.; Huang, J.; et al. Ammonium Mitigates Cd Toxicity in Rice (Oryza Sativa) via Putrescine-Dependent Alterations of Cell Wall Composition. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 132, 189–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, X.Q.; Shen, R.F. Aluminum–Nitrogen Interactions in the Soil–Plant System. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Yu, L.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Kang, H.; Chen, G.; Fan, X.; Sha, L.; Zhou, Y.; Zeng, J. Protective Effect of Different Forms of Nitrogen Application on Cadmium-Induced Toxicity in Wheat Seedlings. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 13085–13094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Afef, N.-H.; Chiraz, C.-H.; Houda, M.D.; Habib, G.; Houda, G. Substitution of NO3 by NH4 + Increases Ammonium-Assimilating Enzyme Activities and Reduces the Deleterious Effects of Cadmium on the Growth of Tomatoes. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2012, 21, 665–671. [Google Scholar]
  20. De la Peña, M.; Marín-Peña, A.J.; Urmeneta, L.; Coleto, I.; Castillo-González, J.; van Liempd, S.M.; Falcón-Pérez, J.M.; Álvarez-Fernández, A.; González-Moro, M.B.; Marino, D. Ammonium Nutrition Interacts with Iron Homeostasis in Brachypodium Distachyon. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, X.; Liu, H.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Wei, C. NH4+-N Alleviates Iron Deficiency in Rice Seedlings under Calcareous Conditions. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 12712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. de Souza, J.C., Jr.; Nogueirol, R.C.; Monteiro, F.A. Nitrate and Ammonium Proportion Plays a Key Role in Copper Phytoextraction, Improving the Antioxidant Defense in Tanzania Guinea Grass. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 171, 823–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Broadley, M.; Brown, P.; Cakmak, I.; Rengel, Z.; Zhao, F. Function of Nutrients: Micronutrients. In Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 191–248. ISBN 978-0-12-384905-2. [Google Scholar]
  24. Schmidt, S.B.; Husted, S. The Biochemical Properties of Manganese in Plants. Plants 2019, 8, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Schmidt, S.B.; Jensen, P.E.; Husted, S. Manganese Deficiency in Plants: The Impact on Photosystem II. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 622–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Socha, A.L.; Guerinot, M.L. Mn-Euvering Manganese: The Role of Transporter Gene Family Members in Manganese Uptake and Mobilization in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Pittman, J.K. Managing the Manganese: Molecular Mechanisms of Manganese Transport and Homeostasis. New Phytol. 2005, 167, 733–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Foy, C.D.; Scott, B.J.; Fisher, J.A. Genetic Differences in Plant Tolerance to Manganese Toxicity. In Manganese in Soils and Plants; Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences; ©Kluwer Academic Publishers: Norwell, MA, USA, 1988; Volume 33, pp. 293–307. ISBN 978-94-010-7768-2. [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, J.; Jia, Y.; Dong, R.; Huang, R.; Liu, P.; Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, G.; Chen, Z. Advances in the Mechanisms of Plant Tolerance to Manganese Toxicity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Wissemeier, A.H.; Horst, W.J. Effect of Light Intensity on Manganese Toxicity Symptoms and Callose Formation in Cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata (L.) Walp.). Plant Soil 1992, 143, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Alejandro, S.; Höller, S.; Meier, B.; Peiter, E. Manganese in Plants: From Acquisition to Subcellular Allocation. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Quartin, V.M.L.; Antunes, M.L.; Muralha, M.C.; Sousa, M.M.; Nunes, M.A. Mineral Imbalance Due to Manganese Excess in Triticales. J. Plant Nutrit. 2001, 24, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. El Khalil, H.; El Hamiani, O.; Bitton, G.; Ouazzani, N.; Boularbah, A. Heavy Metal Contamination from Mining Sites in South Morocco: Monitoring Metal Content and Toxicity of Soil Runoff and Groundwater. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2008, 136, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, P.; Qian, H.; Howard, K.W.F.; Wu, J.; Lyu, X. Anthropogenic Pollution and Variability of Manganese in Alluvial Sediments of the Yellow River, Ningxia, Northwest China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014, 186, 1385–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liu, Z.; Kuang, Y.; Lan, S.; Cao, W.; Yan, Z.; Chen, L.; Chen, Q.; Feng, Q.; Zhou, H. Pollution Distribution of Potentially Toxic Elements in a Karstic River Affected by Manganese Mining in Changyang, Western Hubei, Central China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Helth 2021, 18, 1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Trueman, B.F.; Gregory, B.S.; McCormick, N.E.; Gao, Y.; Gora, S.; Anaviapik-Soucie, T.; L’Hérault, V.; Gagnon, G.A. Manganese Increases Lead Release to Drinking Water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 4803–4812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pinsino, A.; Matranga, V.; Roccheri, M.C. Manganese: A New Emerging Contaminant in the Environment. In Environmental Contamination; Srivastava, J., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2012; pp. 17–37. ISBN 978-953-51-0120-8. [Google Scholar]
  38. Queiroz, H.M.; Ying, S.C.; Abernathy, M.; Barcellos, D.; Gabriel, F.A.; Otero, X.L.; Nóbrega, G.N.; Bernardino, A.F.; Ferreira, T.O. Manganese: The Overlooked Contaminant in the World Largest Mine Tailings Dam Collapse. Environ. Int. 2021, 146, 106284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Acosta, K.; Appenroth, K.J.; Borisjuk, L.; Edelman, M.; Heinig, U.; Jansen, M.A.K.; Oyama, T.; Pasaribu, B.; Schubert, I.; Sorrels, S.; et al. Return of the Lemnaceae: Duckweed as a Model Plant System in the Genomics and Post-Genomics Era. Plant Cell 2021, 33, 3207–3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhou, Y.; Borisjuk, N. Small Aquatic Duckweed Plants with Big Potential for the Production of Valuable Biomass and Wastewater Remediation. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Nat. Resour. 2019, 16, 555942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ziegler, P.; Sree, K.S.; Appenroth, K.-J. Duckweeds for Water Remediation and Toxicity Testing. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2016, 98, 1127–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhou, Y.; Kishchenko, O.; Stepanenko, A.; Chen, G.; Wang, W.; Zhou, J.; Pan, C.; Borisjuk, N. The Dynamics of NO3 and NH4+ Uptake in Duckweed Are Coordinated with the Expression of Major Nitrogen Assimilation Genes. Plants 2022, 11, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhou, Y.; Bai, T.; Kishchenko, O. Potential of Lemnoideae Species for Phytoremediation of Fresh Water with Elevated Manganese Concentration. Innov. Biosyst. Bioeng. 2019, 3, 232–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Michael, T.P.; Bryant, D.; Gutierrez, R.; Borisjuk, N.; Chu, P.; Zhang, H.; Xia, J.; Zhou, J.; Peng, H.; El Baidouri, M.; et al. Comprehensive Definition of Genome Features in Spirodela Polyrhiza by High-Depth Physical Mapping and Short-Read DNA Sequencing Strategies. Plant J. 2017, 89, 617–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Omasits, U.; Ahrens, C.H.; Müller, S.; Wollscheid, B. Protter: Interactive Protein Feature Visualization and Integration with Experimental Proteomic Data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 884–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Tippery, N.P.; Les, D.H. Tiny Plants with Enormous Potential: Phylogeny and Evolution of Duckweeds. In The Duckweed Genomes; Cao, X.H., Fourounjian, P., Wang, W., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 19–38. ISBN 978-3-030-11044-4. [Google Scholar]
  47. Lemoine, F.; Correia, D.; Lefort, V.; Doppelt-Azeroual, O.; Mareuil, F.; Cohen-Boulakia, S.; Gascuel, O. NGPhylogeny.Fr: New Generation Phylogenetic Services for Non-Specialists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W260–W265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (ITOL) v5: An Online Tool for Phylogenetic Tree Display and Annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W293–W296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Marini, A.M.; Soussi-Boudekou, S.; Vissers, S.; Andre, B. A Family of Ammonium Transporters in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 1997, 17, 4282–4293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Higo, K.; Ugawa, Y.; Iwamoto, M.; Korenaga, T. Plant Cis-Acting Regulatory DNA Elements (PLACE) Database: 1999. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, 297–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Lehmann, M. Anything Else but GAGA: A Nonhistone Protein Complex Reshapes Chromatin Structure. Trends Genet. 2004, 20, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hecker, A.; Brand, L.H.; Peter, S.; Simoncello, N.; Kilian, J.; Harter, K.; Gaudin, V.; Wanke, D. The Arabidopsis GAGA-Binding Factor BASIC PENTACYSTEINE6 Recruits the POLYCOMB-REPRESSIVE COMPLEX1 Component LIKE HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN1 to GAGA DNA Motifs. Plant Physiol. 2015, 168, 1013–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tsai, S.-Y.; Chang, Y.-L.; Swamy, K.B.S.; Chiang, R.-L.; Huang, D.-H. GAGA Factor, a Positive Regulator of Global Gene Expression, Modulates Transcriptional Pausing and Organization of Upstream Nucleosomes. Epigenet. Chromatin 2016, 9, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Hernandez, N. TBP, a Universal Eukaryotic Transcription Factor? Genes Dev. 1993, 7, 1291–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Komarnytsky, S.; Borisjuk, N. Functional Analysis of Promoter Elements in Plants. Genet. Eng. 2003, 25, 113–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Leyva-González, M.A.; Ibarra-Laclette, E.; Cruz-Ramírez, A.; Herrera-Estrella, L. Functional and Transcriptome Analysis Reveals an Acclimatization Strategy for Abiotic Stress Tolerance Mediated by Arabidopsis NF-YA Family Members. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Petroni, K.; Kumimoto, R.W.; Gnesutta, N.; Calvenzani, V.; Fornari, M.; Tonelli, C.; Holt, B.F.; Mantovani, R. The Promiscuous Life of Plant NUCLEAR FACTOR Y Transcription Factors. Plant Cell 2013, 24, 4777–4792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Hao, D.-L.; Zhou, J.-Y.; Yang, S.-Y.; Qi, W.; Yang, K.-J.; Su, Y.-H. Function and Regulation of Ammonium Transporters in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhao, X.; Yang, J.; Li, X.; Li, G.; Sun, Z.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Xia, M.; Li, Y.; Yao, L.; et al. Identification and Expression Analysis of GARP Superfamily Genes in Response to Nitrogen and Phosphorus Stress in Spirodela Polyrhiza. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, X.; Wang, H.-F.; Chen, Y.; Sun, M.-M.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.-F. The Transcription Factor NIGT1.2 Modulates Both Phosphate Uptake and Nitrate Influx during Phosphate Starvation in Arabidopsis and Maize. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 3519–3534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yanagisawa, S. Characterization of a Nitrate-Inducible Transcriptional Repressor NIGT1 Provides New Insights into DNA Recognition by the GARP Family Proteins. Plant Signal. Behav. 2013, 8, e24447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Li, Q.; Zhou, L.; Li, Y.; Zhang, D.; Gao, Y. Plant NIGT1/HRS1/HHO Transcription Factors: Key Regulators with Multiple Roles in Plant Growth, Development, and Stress Responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, W.; Haberer, G.; Gundlach, H.; Gläßer, C.; Nussbaumer, T.; Luo, M.C.; Lomsadze, A.; Borodovsky, M.; Kerstetter, R.A.; Shanklin, J.; et al. The Spirodela Polyrrhiza Genome Reveals Insights into Its Neotenous Reduction Fast Growth and Aquatic Lifestyle. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Hoang, P.T.N.; Fiebig, A.; Novák, P.; Macas, J.; Cao, H.X.; Stepanenko, A.; Chen, G.; Borisjuk, N.; Scholz, U.; Schubert, I. Chromosome-Scale Genome Assembly for the Duckweed Spirodela Intermedia, Integrating Cytogenetic Maps, PacBio and Oxford Nanopore Libraries. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 19230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chong, Y.X.; Hu, H.Y.; Qian, Y. Growth feature of biomass of Lemna aequinoctialis and Spirodela polyrrhiza in medium with nutrient character of wastewater. Huan Jing Ke Xue 2004, 25, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Feng, H.; Fan, X.; Miller, A.J.; Xu, G. Plant Nitrogen Uptake and Assimilation: Regulation of Cellular PH Homeostasis. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 4380–4392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Hachiya, T.; Sakakibara, H. Interactions between Nitrate and Ammonium in Their Uptake, Allocation, Assimilation, and Signaling in Plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 68, 2501–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Hu, A.Y.; Zheng, M.M.; Sun, L.M.; Zhao, X.Q.; Shen, R.F. Ammonium Alleviates Manganese Toxicity and Accumulation in Rice by Down-Regulating the Transporter Gene OsNramp5 Through Rhizosphere Acidification. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Langheinrich, U.; Tischner, R.; Godbold, D.L. Influence of a High Mn Supply on Norway Spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) Seedlings in Relation to the Nitrogen Source. Tree Physiol. 1992, 10, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Gerbeau, P.; Amodeo, G.; Henzler, T.; Santoni, V.; Ripoche, P.; Maurel, C. The Water Permeability of Arabidopsis Plasma Membrane Is Regulated by Divalent Cations and PH. Plant J. 2002, 30, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Franz, M.C.; Pujol-Giménez, J.; Montalbetti, N.; Fernandez-Tenorio, M.; DeGrado, T.R.; Niggli, E.; Romero, M.F.; Hediger, M.A. Reassessment of the Transport Mechanism of the Human Zinc Transporter SLC39A2. Biochemistry 2018, 57, 3976–3986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chauvigné, F.; Zapater, C.; Stavang, J.A.; Taranger, G.L.; Cerdà, J.; Finn, R.N. The PH Sensitivity of Aqp0 Channels in Tetraploid and Diploid Teleosts. FASEB J. 2015, 29, 2172–2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Eide, D.J. Transcription Factors and Transporters in Zinc Homeostasis: Lessons Learned from Fungi. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020, 55, 88–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wang, J.; Yu, X.; Ding, Z.J.; Zhang, X.; Luo, Y.; Xu, X.; Xie, Y.; Li, X.; Yuan, T.; Zheng, S.J.; et al. Structural Basis of ALMT1-Mediated Aluminum Resistance in Arabidopsis. Cell Res. 2022, 32, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Tournaire-Roux, C.; Sutka, M.; Javot, H.; Gout, E.; Gerbeau, P.; Luu, D.-T.; Bligny, R.; Maurel, C. Cytosolic PH Regulates Root Water Transport during Anoxic Stress through Gating of Aquaporins. Nature 2003, 425, 393–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Scochera, F.; Zerbetto De Palma, G.; Canessa Fortuna, A.; Chevriau, J.; Toriano, R.; Soto, G.; Zeida, A.; Alleva, K. PIP Aquaporin PH-sensing Is Regulated by the Length and Charge of the C-terminal Region. FEBS J. 2022, 289, 246–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Soto, G.; Alleva, K.; Amodeo, G.; Muschietti, J.; Ayub, N.D. New Insight into the Evolution of Aquaporins from Flowering Plants and Vertebrates: Orthologous Identification and Functional Transfer Is Possible. Gene 2012, 503, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Maurel, C.; Boursiac, Y.; Luu, D.-T.; Santoni, V.; Shahzad, Z.; Verdoucq, L. Aquaporins in Plants. Physiol. Rev. 2015, 95, 1321–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kourghi, M.; Nourmohammadi, S.; Pei, J.; Qiu, J.; McGaughey, S.; Tyerman, S.; Byrt, C.; Yool, A. Divalent Cations Regulate the Ion Conductance Properties of Diverse Classes of Aquaporins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Verdoucq, L.; Grondin, A.; Maurel, C. Structure–function Analysis of Plant Aquaporin AtPIP2;1 Gating by Divalent Cations and Protons. Biochem. J. 2008, 415, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Schwacke, R.; Schneider, A.; van der Graaff, E.; Fischer, K.; Catoni, E.; Desimone, M.; Frommer, W.B.; Flügge, U.-I.; Kunze, R. ARAMEMNON, a Novel Database for Arabidopsis Integral Membrane Proteins. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Neuhäuser, B.; Dynowski, M.; Mayer, M.; Ludewig, U. Regulation of NH4 + Transport by Essential Cross Talk between AMT Monomers through the Carboxyl Tails. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1651–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Ludewig, U.; Neuhäuser, B.; Dynowski, M. Molecular Mechanisms of Ammonium Transport and Accumulation in Plants. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 2301–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Sonoda, Y.; Ikeda, A.; Saiki, S.; von Wirén, N.; Yamaya, T.; Yamaguchi, J. Distinct Expression and Function of Three Ammonium Transporter Genes (OsAMT1;1–1;3) in Rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44, 726–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Li, B.; Merrick, M.; Li, S.; Li, H.; Zhu, S.; Shi, W.; Su, Y. Molecular Basis and Regulation of Ammonium Transporter in Rice. Rice Sci. 2009, 16, 314–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Xu, S.; Stapley, J.; Gablenz, S.; Boyer, J.; Appenroth, K.J.; Sree, K.S.; Gershenzon, J.; Widmer, A.; Huber, M. Low Genetic Variation Is Associated with Low Mutation Rate in the Giant Duckweed. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Bellinger, M.R.; Paudel, R.; Starnes, S.; Kambic, L.; Kantar, M.B.; Wolfgruber, T.; Lamour, K.; Geib, S.; Sim, S.; Miyasaka, S.C.; et al. Taro Genome Assembly and Linkage Map Reveal QTLs for Resistance to Taro Leaf Blight. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2020, 10, 2763–2775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Shi, T.; Huneau, C.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Salse, J.; Wang, Q. The Slow-Evolving Acorus Tatarinowii Genome Sheds Light on Ancestral Monocot Evolution. Nat. Plants 2022, 8, 764–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wu, Z.; Gao, X.; Zhang, N.; Feng, X.; Huang, Y.; Zeng, Q.; Wu, J.; Zhang, J.; Qi, Y. Genome-Wide Identification and Transcriptional Analysis of Ammonium Transporters in Saccharum. Genomics 2021, 113, 1671–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Straub, T.; Ludewig, U.; Neuhäuser, B. The Kinase CIPK23 Inhibits Ammonium Transport in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 409–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Wu, X.; Liu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Duan, F.; Neuhäuser, B.; Ludewig, U.; Schulze, W.X.; Yuan, L. Ammonium and Nitrate Regulate NH4+ Uptake Activity of Arabidopsis Ammonium Transporter AtAMT1;3 via Phosphorylation at Multiple C-Terminal Sites. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 4919–4930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Ganz, P.; Porras-Murillo, R.; Ijato, T.; Menz, J.; Straub, T.; Stührwohldt, N.; Moradtalab, N.; Ludewig, U.; Neuhäuser, B. Abscisic Acid Influences Ammonium Transport via Regulation of Kinase CIPK23 and Ammonium Transporters. Plant Physiol. 2022, 190, 1275–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kaiser, B.N. Functional Analysis of an Arabidopsis T-DNA “Knockout” of the High-Affinity NH4+ Transporter AtAMT1;1. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 1263–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Loqué, D.; Lalonde, S.; Looger, L.L.; von Wirén, N.; Frommer, W.B. A Cytosolic Trans-Activation Domain Essential for Ammonium Uptake. Nature 2007, 446, 195–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ludewig, U.; Wilken, S.; Wu, B.; Jost, W.; Obrdlik, P.; El Bakkoury, M.; Marini, A.-M.; André, B.; Hamacher, T.; Boles, E.; et al. Homo- and Hetero-Oligomerization of Ammonium Transporter-1 NH 4 + Uniporters. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 45603–45610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Nühse, T.S.; Stensballe, A.; Jensen, O.N.; Peck, S.C. Phosphoproteomics of the Arabidopsis Plasma Membrane and a New Phosphorylation Site Database. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 2394–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Gazzarrini, S.; Lejay, L.; Gojon, A.; Ninnemann, O.; Frommer, W.B.; von Wirén, N. Three Functional Transporters for Constitutive, Diurnally Regulated, and Starvation-Induced Uptake of Ammonium into Arabidopsis Roots. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 937–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Kumar, A.; Silim, S.N.; Okamoto, M.; Siddiqi, M.Y.; Glass, A.D.M. Differential Expression of Three Members of the AMT1 Gene Family Encoding Putative High-Affinity NH4+ Transporters in Roots of Oryza Sativa Subspecies Indica: Regulation of AMT1 Genes in Rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2003, 26, 907–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Gu, R.; Duan, F.; An, X.; Zhang, F.; von Wirén, N.; Yuan, L. Characterization of AMT-Mediated High-Affinity Ammonium Uptake in Roots of Maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Cell Physiol. 2013, 54, 1515–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wu, X.; Yang, H.; Qu, C.; Xu, Z.; Li, W.; Hao, B.; Yang, C.; Sun, G.; Liu, G. Sequence and Expression Analysis of the AMT Gene Family in Poplar. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Li, H.; Yang, Q.; Liu, W.; Lin, J.; Chang, Y. The AMT1 Family Genes from Malus Robusta Display Differential Transcription Features and Ammonium Transport Abilities. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2017, 44, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Liu, L.-H.; Fan, T.-F.; Shi, D.-X.; Li, C.-J.; He, M.-J.; Chen, Y.-Y.; Zhang, L.; Yang, C.; Cheng, X.-Y.; Chen, X.; et al. Coding-Sequence Identification and Transcriptional Profiling of Nine AMTs and Four NRTs From Tobacco Revealed Their Differential Regulation by Developmental Stages, Nitrogen Nutrition, and Photoperiod. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Masclaux-Daubresse, C.; Reisdorf-Cren, M.; Orsel, M. Leaf Nitrogen Remobilization for Plant Development and Grain Filling. Plant Biol. 2008, 10, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Van der Graaff, E.; Schwacke, R.; Schneider, A.; Desimone, M.; Flügge, U.-I.; Kunze, R. Transcription Analysis of Arabidopsis Membrane Transporters and Hormone Pathways during Developmental and Induced Leaf Senescence. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 776–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Zhao, H.; Wu, D.; Kong, F.; Lin, K.; Zhang, H.; Li, G. The Arabidopsis thaliana Nuclear Factor Y Transcription Factors. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 7, 2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Myers, Z.A.; Holt, B.F. NUCLEAR FACTOR-Y: Still complex after all these years? Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018, 45, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Swain, S.; Myers, Z.A.; Siriwardana, C.L.; Holt, B.F. The multifaceted roles of NUCLEAR FACTOR-Y in Arabidopsis thaliana development and stress responses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 2017, 1860, 636–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Du, W.; Yang, J.; Li, Q.; He, C.; Pang, Y. Identification and Characterization of Abiotic Stress-Responsive NF-YB Family Genes in Medicago. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Schenk, R.U.; Hildebrandt, A.C. Medium and Techniques for Induction and Growth of Monocotyledonous and Dicotyledonous Plant Cell Cultures. Can. J. Bot. 1972, 50, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhou, Y.; Chen, G.; Peterson, A.; Zha, X.; Cheng, J.; Li, S.; Cui, D.; Zhu, H.; Kishchenko, O.; Borisjuk, N. Biodiversity of Duckweeds in Eastern China and Their Potential for Bioremediation of Municipal and Industrial Wastewater. J. Geosci. Environ. Protect. 2018, 06, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Cedergreen, N.; Madsen, T.V. Nitrogen Uptake by the Floating Macrophyte Lemna Minor. New Phytol. 2002, 155, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. American Water Works Association (AWWA). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st ed.; AWWA: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  113. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Guindon, S.; Dufayard, J.-F.; Lefort, V.; Anisimova, M.; Hordijk, W.; Gascuel, O. New Algorithms and Methods to Estimate Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies: Assessing the Performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Criscuolo, A.; Gribaldo, S. BMGE (Block Mapping and Gathering with Entropy): A New Software for Selection of Phylogenetic Informative Regions from Multiple Sequence Alignments. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Ludewig, U.; von Wirén, N.; Frommer, W.B. Uniport of NH 4 + by the Root Hair Plasma Membrane Ammonium Transporter LeAMT1;1. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 13548–13555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Pfaffl, M.W. A New Mathematical Model for Relative Quantification in Real-Time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29, e45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Vandesompele, J.; De Preter, K.; Pattyn, F.; Poppe, B.; Van Roy, N.; De Paepe, A.; Speleman, F. Accurate Normalization of Real-Time Quantitative RT-PCR Data by Geometric Averaging of Multiple Internal Control Genes. Genome Biol. 2002, 3, RESEARCH0034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Dynamic parameters related to duckweed cultivation in media with different formulations of N and Mn: (A) Duckweed biomass at the beginning of the experiment, (light green) and following 4 days (green) and 12 days (dark green) cultivation in media supplied with different concentrations of nitrate, ammonium and Mn. N-Mn1—medium containing 5 mM NO 3 and 0.059 mM Mn; N-Mn50—medium containing 5 mM NO 3 and 2.95 mM Mn; M-Mn1—medium containing a mixture of 2.5 mM NO 3 , 2.5 mM NH 4 + and 0.059 mM Mn; M-Mn50—medium containing a mixture of 2.5 mM NO 3 , 2.5 mM NH 4 + and 2.95 mM Mn. (B) Images of S. polyrhiza fronds taken at day 12 following cultivation in media supplied with different concentrations of nitrate, ammonium and Mn; (C) Comparative dynamics of nitrogen uptake, supplied in the medium in form of nitrate ( NO 3 ) or ammonium ( NH 4 + ); (D) Comparative dynamics of pH of four cultivation media in course of duckweed growth. Bar is 1 cm.
Figure 1. Dynamic parameters related to duckweed cultivation in media with different formulations of N and Mn: (A) Duckweed biomass at the beginning of the experiment, (light green) and following 4 days (green) and 12 days (dark green) cultivation in media supplied with different concentrations of nitrate, ammonium and Mn. N-Mn1—medium containing 5 mM NO 3 and 0.059 mM Mn; N-Mn50—medium containing 5 mM NO 3 and 2.95 mM Mn; M-Mn1—medium containing a mixture of 2.5 mM NO 3 , 2.5 mM NH 4 + and 0.059 mM Mn; M-Mn50—medium containing a mixture of 2.5 mM NO 3 , 2.5 mM NH 4 + and 2.95 mM Mn. (B) Images of S. polyrhiza fronds taken at day 12 following cultivation in media supplied with different concentrations of nitrate, ammonium and Mn; (C) Comparative dynamics of nitrogen uptake, supplied in the medium in form of nitrate ( NO 3 ) or ammonium ( NH 4 + ); (D) Comparative dynamics of pH of four cultivation media in course of duckweed growth. Bar is 1 cm.
Plants 12 00208 g001
Figure 2. Clustering of AMT protein sequences from selected plant species. The phylograms shows a maximum likelihood tree obtained using available AMT protein sequences from different plants. Multiple alignment and phylogenetic tree were generated in NGPhylogeny webservice (https://ngphylogeny.fr, accessed on 27 September 2022) [47] and iTOL (https://itol.embl.de, accessed on 29 September 2022) [48].
Figure 2. Clustering of AMT protein sequences from selected plant species. The phylograms shows a maximum likelihood tree obtained using available AMT protein sequences from different plants. Multiple alignment and phylogenetic tree were generated in NGPhylogeny webservice (https://ngphylogeny.fr, accessed on 27 September 2022) [47] and iTOL (https://itol.embl.de, accessed on 29 September 2022) [48].
Plants 12 00208 g002
Figure 3. Transport activity of SpAMTs in yeast. Top panel represents growth on 0.3 or 1 mM NH4Cl as sole nitrogen source, 0.1 % (w/v) Arginine was used as a positive control. Growth on 60 mM MeA was used as a toxicity test, with 0.1 % (w/v) Arginine as nitrogen source. The bottom panel shows growth on 1 mM NH4Cl when media was buffered at pH 4.5, 5.5 or 6.5 unbuffered media with 0.1 % (w/v) Arginine was used as dilution control. Spotted were five 10 times dilutions starting with OD595 = 5. Pictures are representatives of four independent repetitions.
Figure 3. Transport activity of SpAMTs in yeast. Top panel represents growth on 0.3 or 1 mM NH4Cl as sole nitrogen source, 0.1 % (w/v) Arginine was used as a positive control. Growth on 60 mM MeA was used as a toxicity test, with 0.1 % (w/v) Arginine as nitrogen source. The bottom panel shows growth on 1 mM NH4Cl when media was buffered at pH 4.5, 5.5 or 6.5 unbuffered media with 0.1 % (w/v) Arginine was used as dilution control. Spotted were five 10 times dilutions starting with OD595 = 5. Pictures are representatives of four independent repetitions.
Plants 12 00208 g003
Figure 4. Functional characterization of SpAMT1;1 and SpAMT1;3 in Xenopus laevis oocytes: (A) Current/Voltage plot of ammonium induced currents in SpAMT1;1 and SpAMT1;3 expressing oocytes. Currents without ammonium were subtracted from currents with 3 mM ammonium; (B) For comparison of current intensities, ammonium induced (wash subtracted) currents by 3 mM and 100 mV are given as a bar chart; (C) Saturation kinetics of SpAMT1;1 and SpAMT1;3 mediated ammonium transport in oocytes using concentrations of ammonium from 0–10 mM NH 4 Cl . Data show means +/− SEM; n ≥ 8.
Figure 4. Functional characterization of SpAMT1;1 and SpAMT1;3 in Xenopus laevis oocytes: (A) Current/Voltage plot of ammonium induced currents in SpAMT1;1 and SpAMT1;3 expressing oocytes. Currents without ammonium were subtracted from currents with 3 mM ammonium; (B) For comparison of current intensities, ammonium induced (wash subtracted) currents by 3 mM and 100 mV are given as a bar chart; (C) Saturation kinetics of SpAMT1;1 and SpAMT1;3 mediated ammonium transport in oocytes using concentrations of ammonium from 0–10 mM NH 4 Cl . Data show means +/− SEM; n ≥ 8.
Plants 12 00208 g004
Figure 5. Expression patterns of the four SpAMT genes in duckweed cultivated in different media (N-Mn1, M-Mn1, N-Mn50 and M-Mn50). The gene expression was determined at cultivation day 4 by RT-qPCR relative to day 0, starting point (SP). Gene expression levels are in relative units. Error bars show ± SD of 3 replicates (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Expression patterns of the four SpAMT genes in duckweed cultivated in different media (N-Mn1, M-Mn1, N-Mn50 and M-Mn50). The gene expression was determined at cultivation day 4 by RT-qPCR relative to day 0, starting point (SP). Gene expression levels are in relative units. Error bars show ± SD of 3 replicates (p < 0.05).
Plants 12 00208 g005
Figure 6. Schematic representation of promoters of the four AMT genes (AMT1;1, AMT1;2, AMT1;3 and AMT2) in the genomes of Spirodela polyrhiza (Sp) and Spirodela intermedia (Si). The negative numbers represent distance from the first ATG codon in nucleotides (bp). Colored boxes indicate locations of the corresponding promoter cis-elements. The conservation bar refers to the level of similarity between the homologous promoter sequences of Spirodela polyrhiza (Sp) and Spirodela intermedia (Si).
Figure 6. Schematic representation of promoters of the four AMT genes (AMT1;1, AMT1;2, AMT1;3 and AMT2) in the genomes of Spirodela polyrhiza (Sp) and Spirodela intermedia (Si). The negative numbers represent distance from the first ATG codon in nucleotides (bp). Colored boxes indicate locations of the corresponding promoter cis-elements. The conservation bar refers to the level of similarity between the homologous promoter sequences of Spirodela polyrhiza (Sp) and Spirodela intermedia (Si).
Plants 12 00208 g006
Figure 7. Expression patterns of two aquaporin genes, SpTIP2;1 and SpPIP2;2, in duckweed cultivated in different media (N-Mn1, M-Mn1, N-Mn50 and M-Mn50). The genes expression was estimated at the cultivation day 4 by RT-qPCR relating to day 0, starting point (SP). Gene expression levels are in relative units. Error bars show ± SD of 3 replicates (p < 0.05).
Figure 7. Expression patterns of two aquaporin genes, SpTIP2;1 and SpPIP2;2, in duckweed cultivated in different media (N-Mn1, M-Mn1, N-Mn50 and M-Mn50). The genes expression was estimated at the cultivation day 4 by RT-qPCR relating to day 0, starting point (SP). Gene expression levels are in relative units. Error bars show ± SD of 3 replicates (p < 0.05).
Plants 12 00208 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kishchenko, O.; Stepanenko, A.; Straub, T.; Zhou, Y.; Neuhäuser, B.; Borisjuk, N. Ammonium Uptake, Mediated by Ammonium Transporters, Mitigates Manganese Toxicity in Duckweed, Spirodela polyrhiza. Plants 2023, 12, 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010208

AMA Style

Kishchenko O, Stepanenko A, Straub T, Zhou Y, Neuhäuser B, Borisjuk N. Ammonium Uptake, Mediated by Ammonium Transporters, Mitigates Manganese Toxicity in Duckweed, Spirodela polyrhiza. Plants. 2023; 12(1):208. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010208

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kishchenko, Olena, Anton Stepanenko, Tatsiana Straub, Yuzhen Zhou, Benjamin Neuhäuser, and Nikolai Borisjuk. 2023. "Ammonium Uptake, Mediated by Ammonium Transporters, Mitigates Manganese Toxicity in Duckweed, Spirodela polyrhiza" Plants 12, no. 1: 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010208

APA Style

Kishchenko, O., Stepanenko, A., Straub, T., Zhou, Y., Neuhäuser, B., & Borisjuk, N. (2023). Ammonium Uptake, Mediated by Ammonium Transporters, Mitigates Manganese Toxicity in Duckweed, Spirodela polyrhiza. Plants, 12(1), 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010208

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop