Next Article in Journal
Genetic Diversity of Weedy Rice and Its Potential Application as a Novel Source of Disease Resistance
Next Article in Special Issue
Responses to Airborne Ozone and Soilborne Metal Pollution in Afforestation Plants with Different Life Forms
Previous Article in Journal
Top and Side Lighting Induce Morphophysiological Improvements in Korean Ginseng Sprouts (Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer) Grown from One-Year-Old Roots
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transcriptomics and Metabolomics Reveal the Critical Genes of Carotenoid Biosynthesis and Color Formation of Goji (Lycium barbarum L.) Fruit Ripening
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 15
10.3390/plants12152848
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Heterologous Overexpression of Apple MdKING1 Promotes Fruit Ripening in Tomato

by
Qianyu Yue
1,2,†,
Xinyue Yang
2,†,
Pengda Cheng
2,
Jieqiang He
2,
Wenyun Shen
2,
Yixuan Li
2,
Fengwang Ma
2,
Chundong Niu
1,2,* and
Qingmei Guan
1,2,*
1
Shenzhen Research Institute, Northwest A&F University, Shenzhen 518000, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas/Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Apple, College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2023, 12(15), 2848; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12152848
Submission received: 13 July 2023 / Revised: 29 July 2023 / Accepted: 29 July 2023 / Published: 2 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Plant Physiology and Metabolism)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fruit ripening is governed by a complex regulatory network, and ethylene plays an important role in this process. MdKING1 is a γ subunit of SNF1-related protein kinases (SnRKs), but the function was unclear. Here, we characterized the role of MdKING1 during fruit ripening, which can promote fruit ripening through the ethylene pathway. Our findings reveal that MdKING1 has higher expression in early-ripening cultivars than late-ripening during the early stage of apple fruit development, and its transcription level significantly increased during apple fruit ripening. Overexpression of MdKING1 (MdKING1 OE) in tomatoes could promote early ripening of fruits, with the increase in ethylene content and the loss of fruit firmness. Ethylene inhibitor treatment could delay the fruit ripening of both MdKING1 OE and WT fruits. However, MdKING1 OE fruits turned fruit ripe faster, with an increase in carotenoid content compared with WT. In addition, the expression of genes involved in ethylene biosynthesis (SlACO1, SlACS2, and SlACS4), carotenoid biosynthesis (SlPSY1 and SlGgpps2a), and fruit firmness regulation (SlPG2a, SlPL, and SlCEL2) was also increased in the fruits of MdKING1 OE plants. In conclusion, our results suggest that MdKING1 plays a key role in promoting tomato fruit ripening, thus providing a theoretical basis for apple fruit quality improvement by genetic engineering in the future.

1. Introduction

Ripening, the final stage of fruit development, is governed by an elaborate regulatory network and is of practical importance to the human diet [1]. Fruit quality develops gradually during ripening and is precisely regulated. However, fruit ripening is a complex process that involves a series of biochemical and physiological changes, including decreased firmness of the fruits, increased ethylene content, and accumulation of carotenoids, which affect the development of fruit qualities such as color, aroma, flavor, and texture [2]. Moreover, fruit ripening can be affected by a variety of factors, like genetics, environmental conditions, and hormone levels [3,4], among which the regulation of plant hormones plays an important role, such as ethylene, auxins, abscisic acid, jasmonates, and brassinosteroids [5].
According to ethylene emissions and respiration rates during fruit ripening, fruits can be divided into climacteric fruits (apple, tomato, banana, mango) and non-climacteric fruit (strawberry, grape, cherry, pineapple) [6,7]. From previous studies, abscisic acid (ABA) mainly regulates non-climacteric fruit ripening [8], while ethylene plays a key role in the ripening regulation of climacteric fruits [9]. Ethylene, as the most important phytohormone affecting fruit ripening, is regulated by biosynthesis and signal-transduction pathways in fruit [5,10]. Ethylene biosynthesis reaction consists of two steps, S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM) is transformed into 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic (ACC) by ACC synthase (ACS), and then ACC is catalyzed into ethylene formation by ACC oxidase (ACO) [11]. In apple fruit, MdACS6, MdACS3a, and MdACS1 are the most important ACS genes that play an important role in fruit ripening and ethylene biosynthesis [12,13,14]. Additionally, inhibition of ACS2 and ACS4 gene expression in tomato fruit delayed fruit ripening by reducing ethylene production [15,16]. Chen’s [17] studies show that ACO acts as an accelerator in fruit ripening [17]. In the ethylene signal-transduction pathway, ethylene first binds to the receptor, and then the signal can be transduced into the downstream genes [18]. Ethylene receptors include three families that have been identified, including ethylene resistant (ETR), ethylene response sensor (ERS), and ethylene insensitive 4 (EIN4) [5].
SNF1-related protein kinase 1 (SnRK1) in plants is an ortholog of yeast sucrose non-fermenting 1 (SNF1) and mammalian AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), and they function as heterotrimeric complexes, including an α-catalytic subunit (KINα) and two regulatory subunits (KINβ and KINγ) [19,20]. In plants, a βγ subunit (KINβγ), which seems to be a hybrid β and γ subunit, confers canonical γ subunit functionality, but the γ subunit (KINγ) is not directly involved in SnRK1 signaling [21]. In in vitro analysis, KINγ has the potential to regulate the activity of SNF1-related protein kinase 2s (SnRK2s) [22], but the biological function of KINγ is still unclear. In Arabidopsis, overexpression of SnRK1 could increase the sensitivity of Arabidopsis to glucose and ABA, and the addition of glucose during ABA treatment further enhanced the sensitivity of SnRK1 overexpression plants to ABA [23]. Three SnRK2 subfamily genes, SnRK2.2/SnRK2.3/SnRK2.6, could regulate cuticle development through the ABA pathway [24]. Regardless of SnRK1 or SnRK2, they all play an important role in plant development. The ABA signaling pathways interacted with SnRK signaling pathways to regulate plant growth and metabolism. The phosphorylation level of MdSnRK2.4/2.9 (two MdSnRK2-I members) significantly increased throughout apple fruit development and ripening, MdSnRK2-I increased MdACO1 expression, and MdACS1 protein stability promoted ethylene production in apple fruits [25]. LcSnRK1α modulated litchi fruit senescence by interacting with and phosphorylating two transcription factors, LcbZIP1 and LcbZIP3 [26]. In tomatoes, overexpression of MhSnRK1 and PpSnRK1α promotes fruit ripening [27,28,29]. SnRK1 phosphorylated transcription factor bZIP39 to regulate sorbitol metabolism in “Royal Gala” apple [30]. However, it is not clear whether the KINγ can affect fruit ripening.
Apple has the characteristics of self-incompatibility, high genome heterozygosity, and long childhood. Therefore, the functional verification of genes related to fruit traits in apples still lags behind other crops [31]. Tomato has emerged as a well-defined model system for dissecting the ripening mechanism of climacteric fruit [10], accompanied by a short developmental cycle, while apple is also a typical climacteric fruit. Therefore, we can use tomatoes as background material to verify the regulatory functions of candidate genes related to fruit development in apples through heterologous transformation. Here, we found that MdKING1, which belongs to a SnRK1 γ subunit (KINγ), could play an important role in fruit ripening. Then, we cloned and overexpressed MdKING1 in tomato plants. MdKING1 OE plants exhibited a significantly higher ethylene and carotenoid content and accelerated fruit ripening. Meanwhile, ethylene synthesis, carotenoid synthesis, and fruit firmness-related gene expression are significantly upregulated in MdKING1 OE plants. In conclusion, this study reveals the positive regulatory function of MdKING1 in fruit ripening and provides a theoretical basis for fruit quality improvement and new cultivar breeding.

2. Results

2.1. Identification and Expression Analysis of MdKING1

We previously identified that the homolog of MD06G1142700 was associated with the development of apple (Malus c domestica cv.) fruits [32], in which the expression of early-cultivar “Geneva Early” was significantly higher than that of late-cultivar “Hanfu” at 7 and 24 days after pollination (DAP). During the process of apple fruit development to maturity, the expression of MD06G1142700 maintained an increasing trend and reached the peak at the picking stage (Figure 1A). We also selected five varieties in the early-ripening and late-ripening accessions for verification, and the results showed that the MD06G1142700 gene in the early-ripening accessions was still expressed at a higher level than that in the late-ripening at 24 DAP (Figure 1B,C). Sequence analysis showed this gene contains a putative coding region of 1272 bp, which encodes 432 amino acids with a predicted molecular weight 47.06 kDa. BLASTP analysis of protein sequence alignment showed that it had 69% sequence identity with KINγ in Arabidopsis and 74.29% with tomatoes, which contained four tandem cystathionine β–synthase (CBS) motifs (Figure 2A). Furthermore, the phylogenetic analysis showed that MD06G1142700 is homologous to AtKINγ (Figure 2B); we therefore named it MdKING1. These data suggested that the function of MdKING1 may be related to fruit ripening in apples.

2.2. Overexpression of MdKING1 Accelerates Fruit Ripening in Tomato

To investigate the function of MdKING1 in fruit ripening, we introduced the full-length MdKING1 coding sequence (CDS) into the background of the cultivar Alisa Craig (AC). We generated four stable MdKING1 overexpression (OE) transgenic tomato plants (Supplemental Figure S1A,B). MdKING1 OE #3/#4 transgenic tomato plants were used for the following phenotypic analysis. Since the reddish color of the fruit was a characteristic of tomato fruit ripening [33], we observed and recorded the ripening characteristics of wild-type (WT) and MdKING1 OE lines at seven different ripening stages (MG, Br, Br +3 to 14). Figure 3A showed that MdKING1 OE fruits accumulated pigments more rapidly than WT. At the Br stage, we clearly observed that the MdKING1 OE transgenic fruits were the first to show a color breaker compared with WT. In Br +10 stage, the skin of MdKING1 OE fruits turned red completely, compared with WT fruit (Br +14 stage), suggesting that MdKING1 OE fruits could enter the fruit ripening stage earlier. Characteristic of fruit ripening is the degradation of chlorophyll and the synthesis and accumulation of the carotenoids, lycopene, and β-carotene. A colorimeter was used to measure the color of tomato fruits pericarp by the CIE L*a*b* color system [34]. The values L* (Lightness), a* (color index), and b* (yellowness index) are indicated by the ratio of white to black color, red to green, and yellow to blue, determined by the degradation of chlorophyll and the accumulation of carotenoids, such as β-carotene and lycopene, which produce the characteristic yellow, orange, and red coloration (Figure 3B). The a* and b* values in MdKING1 OE transgenic tomato fruits from coloring to ripening stage, were significantly higher than those in WT, except the b* value in the Br +5 period, and the L* value was significantly lower than WT (Figure 3B).
The respiration rate and ethylene content of climacteric fruit increased significantly during ripening. Ethylene plays a vital role in fruit ripening [35], and the ripening process is accompanied by softening of the fruit [33]. To better observe whether the overexpression of MdKING1 in tomatoes could promote fruit ripening, we determined the ethylene production and fruit firmness at four different developmental stages (MG, Br, Br +5, +10) in WT and MdKING1 OE fruits. The results showed that there was no significant difference in ethylene content between MdKING1 OE fruits and WT at the MG stage, but the ethylene content of MdKING1 OE fruits was significantly higher than WT from Br to Br +10 stage (Figure 3C). During the development period from MG to Br +10, the firmness of MdKING1 OE fruits was lower, which decreased significantly at Br +5 and +10 stages than WT (Figure 3D).
To determine whether MdKING1 was involved in the ethylene signaling pathway, exogenous ethylene and the ethylene perception inhibitor 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) were used to treat WT tomato fruits at MG and Br stages of fruit ripening, respectively [36]. The results showed that the transcription level of the MdKING1 gene in apple fruit was induced by ethylene but inhibited by 1-MCP (Figure 3E,F). Based on the above results, it could be hypothesized that the MdKING1 gene was induced by exogenous ethylene treatment, and it may promote the early ripening of tomatoes by involving in the ethylene signaling pathway.

2.3. MdKING1 Affects Fruit Ripening through the Ethylene Pathway

To further verify that the MdKING1 gene affects tomato fruit ripening by responding to the ethylene signaling pathway, we performed 1-MCP treatment. The tomato fruits of WT and MdKING1 OE at the Br stage were sampled and treated with 1.0 μL 1-MCP for 12 h, with air as the control group, then the phenotypes of fruits in the control were continuously observed and measured and treated at room temperature. After being treated with 1-MCP, the tomato fruits of MdKING1 OE reached the color change 2–3 days earlier than the WT (Figure 4).
With the ripening of tomato fruits, carotenoids (including lycopene, β-carotenoids, and lutein) are gradually increased, and the chlorophyll is degraded [37]. To further investigate how MdKING1 affects fruit ripening, we measured the content of chlorophyll, lycopene, β-carotenoids, and lutein at different stages. The results showed that the chlorophyll content of WT and MdKING1 OE fruits decreased significantly under control conditions, and the decline rate of MdKING1 OE fruits was faster than the WT (Figure 5A). Opposite to the change in chlorophyll in fruit development, the contents of lycopene, β-carotene, and lutein in both WT and MdKING1 OE fruits gradually increased, and the content of carotenoids in MdKING1 OE fruits increased rapidly compared to WT (Figure 5B–D).
Moreover, we measured the contents of chlorophyll and carotenoids in MdKING1 OE and WT fruits at different time periods after 1-MCP treatment. We found the fruit ripening of both WT and MdKING1 OE fruits was delayed, and the decline rate of chlorophyll content in WT fruit was slower than that of MdKING1 OE (Figure 5E). Lycopene, β-carotene, and lutein gradually accumulated in WT and MdKING1 OE with the prolongation of treatment time, and the increase rate of MdKING1 OE fruit was faster than that of WT (Figure 5F–H).
Taken together, these results showed that the ethylene pathway blocked and could delay the fruit ripening of MdKING1 OE lines, but ripened faster than WT, suggesting MdKING1 might be induced by ethylene and respond to the ethylene signaling pathway.

2.4. Transcriptomic Analysis of MdKING1 OE Fruits

To further explore the mechanism of MdKING1 in the fruit ripening process, we performed transcriptome deep sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis of WT and MdKING1 OE fruits at the Br stage. Principal component analysis (PCA) shows a good correlation between the biological replicates (Supplemental Figure S2). As shown in Figure 6A, a total of 3028 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, of which 734 were upregulated and 2294 were downregulated in MdKING1 OE fruits as compared with WT fruits. Consistent with the accelerated ripening in MdKING1 OE lines, Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis revealed that 3028 DEGs were significantly enriched in terms of association with the ethylene biosynthetic process (GO: 0009693), fruit development (GO: 0010154), fruit ripening (GO: 0009835), and the ethylene metabolic process (GO: 0009692) (Figure 6C). Furthermore, multiple metabolic pathways, including carbohydrate metabolic (GO: 0005975), amino acid metabolic (GO: 1901605), secondary metabolite (GO: 0044550), and signal transduction (GO: 0007165), were enriched (Figure 6C). The KEGG pathway analysis revealed the top 16 most enriched metabolic pathways, including flavonoid biosynthesis, phenylalanine metabolism, and galactose metabolism (Supplemental Figure S3).
We also investigated whether the ripening-related genes were modulated in MdKING1 OE lines compared to WT. The heatmap of Figure 6B showed genes involved in ethylene synthesis and signal transduction (SlACO1, SlACS2, SlACS4, and SlERF2) [11,38], carotenoid metabolism (SlPSY1 and SlGgpps2) [39,40], fruit softening (SlPG2a, SlPL, and SlCEL2) [41,42], and the key fruit ripening regulator (SlNR, SlNOR, SlRIN, and SlTAGL1) [43,44]; the expression level of all these genes was significantly increased in the MdKING1 OE lines compared to that of WT. In addition, we verified the expression levels of SlPL, SlPSY1, SlACO1, SlACS2, and SlACS4, which were the DEGs in WT and MdKING1 OE lines at the Br stage (Figure 7), the transcript levels of these five genes were significantly higher in MdKING1 OE lines than WT, consistent with RNA-seq data. Finally, we also detected the expression levels of these five genes at other development stages to determine the role of MdKING1 in promoting fruit ripening. As expected, the expression of all these genes in MdKING1 OE lines was also higher than WT at Br +5 and +10 stages, and these genes were more highly expressed at the Br +5 stage than the other stages (Figure 7). In summary, these results suggest that MdKING1 could affect the expression of genes related to fruit firmness as well as carotenoid and ethylene synthesis, thereby affecting fruit ripening.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

The tomato (Solanum lycopersicum cv. Alisa Craig, AC) was used as the transgenic materials and wild-type (WT). WT and transgenic lines were cultivated in standard greenhouses to ensure consistency of growth conditions. (Yangling City, Shaanxi Province, China) with natural light.

3.2. Generation of Transgenic Plants

The full-length MdKING1 coding sequence (CDS) was amplified from apple (Malus × domestica cv. Golden Delicious) cDNA using the specific primer (Supplemental Table S1) into pENTR then introduced into the plant overexpression vector pK7WGF2. The resulting pro35S, MdKING1, was transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101, then transformed into tomato cultivar AC by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. During tomato infection, tomato seeds were first surface sterilized with 75% alcohol and sodium hypochlorite solution, followed by immersion cleaning in sterilized distilled water to obtain sterile materials. After that, the sterilized seeds were spread on 1/2 MS solid agar medium (pH = 5.8) and left to germinate, and the cotyledons were assessed for Agrobacterium infection. Kanamycin was used for selecting stable transformants based on their resistance. Four independent T2 homozygous progeny were used to identify transgenic materials, in which MdKING1 OE #3 and MdKING1 OE #4 were used for phenotypic characterization.

3.3. Color Measurement

A WR-10QC colorimeter (Shenzhen Weifu Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) with the CIE L*a*b* color system was chosen for the pericarp color assay [34]. At least fifteen biological replicates were used for each assay.

3.4. Ethrel and 1-Methylcyclopropene Treatment

Referring to previous studies [39], apple and tomato fruits were harvested at green stage and treated with 0.4% ethrel for 10 min, double-distilled water (DDW) as a control, then dried and transferred to room temperature conditions. The WT and MdKING1 OE tomato fruits at breaker (Br) stage and color-turning apples were treated with 1.0 μL L−1 ethylene signaling inhibitor 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) for 12 h in a sealed container. After treatment, peel tissue was sliced and frozen in liquid nitrogen for RNA extraction and qRT-PCR verification. For each treatment, there were three biological replicates from the independent sample.

3.5. Determination of Ethylene Content

WT and transgenic tomato fruits were harvested at MG, Br, Br +5, and Br +10 stages, then placed in the open container for 2 h. Then, these fruits were placed in a sealed container at room temperature for 24 h. Measurement of collected sealed container gases (1 mL headspace gas) was carried out using an Agilent gas chromatograph (GC). Samples were compared with reagent-grade ethylene standards of known concentration and normalized for fruit weight. The experiment was performed with three biological replications.

3.6. Determination of Carotenoid Content

Carotenoids of tomato fruits at MG, Br, Br +5, and +10 stages from MdKING1 OE and WT were extracted as previously described [45], and 3 independent extractions were performed. The whole process of carotene extraction was carried out at low temperature, and light was avoided. Carotenoids were identified, and the relative contents were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (LC-2030CD, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) as previously described [45].

3.7. Measurement of Fruit Firmness

Ten fruits of each WT and transgenic tomato fruit were harvested at the MG, Br, Br +5, and +10 stages; their firmness was measured at five directions along the equatorial surface of the fruits with a fruit-firmness tester (GY-3, TOP Instrument, Zhejiang, China); and their average value was calculated. The experiment was performed with ten biological replications.

3.8. RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from tomato fruits using the CTAB method [46,47]. After treatment with RNase-free DNase I (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop One spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to reverse transcribed 1 microgram of total RNA into first-strand cDNA. Detection of gene transcript levels was performed with ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (C601, Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China) on the CFX96 real-time system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The relative expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method with tomato Actin gene (Solyc03g078400) as an internal reference gene. The primers used are listed in Supplemental Table S1.

3.9. Sequence and Phylogenetic Analysis

The full-length protein sequence of KING1 in apple was obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 15 February 2023), AtKINγ and other SnRK1 subunits in Arabidopsis was obtained from the Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR, https://www.arabidopsis.org/index.jsp, accessed on 15 February 2023), and SlKING1 in tomato was obtained from the Plant Genomics Resource (JGI, https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov/, accessed on 18 February 2023). Sequence alignments were performed using the MUSCLE program (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/muscle/, accessed on 18 February 2023), and the domain was predicted using the SMART program (version 9.0) (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/, accessed on 18 February 2023). The phylogenetic tree was inferred from the neighbor-joining method with 2000 bootstrap replications and the Poisson correction method in the MEGA 11 program [47].

3.10. Transcriptome Analysis

For transcriptomic analysis, the WT and MdKING1 OE #3 fruits at the Br stage were selected as the experimental materials, and each sample had three biological replicates. The total RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis were performed as previously described [46,48]. Libraries were produced using the NEBNext® UltraTM RNA Library Prep Kit (New England Biolabs, MA, USA), with which they were sequenced by using the Illumina HiSeq platform at Novogene (Beijing, China). Clean reads were aligned to the tomato reference genome (SL4.0, https://solgenomics.net/, accessed on 14 March 2023) with HISAT2 v2.1.0 (http://daehwankimlab.github.io/hisat2/, accessed on 14 March 2023). SAMTools v1.9 was utilized for subsequent data processing including BAM conversion, sorting, and indexing. Gene reads were detected by htseq-count in HTSeq v0.13.5 using the ITAG4.0 gene annotation file. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified based on a threshold of adjusted p-value < 0.05 and an absolute value of log2 (fold change) > 1 with the R package DESeq2 v1.20.1. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was performed for the accession numbers with DEGs via g:Profiler [49]. KEGG enrichment analysis was performed using the KOBAS (version 3.0) software (http://bioinfo.org/kobas/genelist/, accessed on 20 March 2023).

3.11. Statistical Analysis

Significance analysis of corresponding experimental data was conducted using GraphPad Prism 8.0 software. Student’s two-tailed t test (* p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, and *** p ≤ 0.001) was used for pairwise comparisons statistical analysis.

4. Discussion

Fruit ripening is governed by a complex network, and numerous genes have been identified as playing an important role in this development stage [10,50,51]. SnRKs are a large family of protein kinases, functioning as a heterotrimeric complex, including an α catalytic subunit and two regulatory subunits (KINβ and KINγ), which play an important role in plant development and stress response [20,52,53]. Previous studies have shown that MhSnRK1 promotes fruit ripening through increasing starch and soluble sugars [29]. Yu [28] found that Prunus persica SNF1-related kinase α subunit (PpSnRK1a) interacts with RIN to regulate fruit ripening. However, little is known about the function of the SnRK γ subunit in fruit ripening. Here, we describe the role of the SnRKγ subunit (MdKING1) in fruit ripening, which may be regulated by influencing the expression of ripening-related genes and promoting carotenoid and ethylene content in response to ethylene signaling pathways. Previous research found that the ABA and SnRK signaling pathways could interact in order to regulate plant growth and metabolism [23]. ABA regulates non-climacteric fruit ripening [8] and increases the transcript levels of ACS and ACO in peach and tomato, respectively [54]. Xu [55] found the level of ABA accumulation increased at early fruit development of apple and then decreased at the fruit harvest stage. Similarly, the transcription level of MdKING1 significantly increased during apple fruit ripening (Figure 1A). Meanwhile, the expression level of ethylene biosynthesis genes SlACS2/4 and ethylene release showed the same trend in MdKING1 OE tomato fruits (Figure 3C, Figure 6B and Figure 7). However, whether ABA participated in the fruit ripening which is mediated by MdKING1 is not clear.
Previous studies showed that, in the early stages of fruit development (7 and 24 DAP), the relevant genes regulating fruit development in early-ripening “Geneva Early” were expressed earlier than in late-ripening “Hanfu” [32]. We observed that MdKING1, a homologous gene of AtKINγ, which contained four tandem cystathionine β–synthase (CBS) motifs (Figure 2A), has a higher expression level in early-cultivar “Geneva Early” apple than late-cultivar “Hanfu” at 7 and 24 days after pollination (DAP), and its transcription level significantly increased during apple fruit ripening (Figure 1A). Similarly, the expression of MdKING1 in the five apple varieties of the early-ripening population was higher than that of the late-ripening population (Figure 1B,C). This result implied that MdKING1 may be an important factor affecting the fruit ripening of apples.
Tomato is an ideal model plant for studying climacteric fruit ripening [10]. During the ripening process, the respiration rate of climacteric fruit increases rapidly, accompanied by an increase in ethylene and carotenoid content [35,56,57]. Guo [58] found that MdARD4 regulates the ethylene and carotenoid signaling pathways, increases ethylene and carotenoid content, and accelerates fruit ripening. Knockout of SlMED25, which is the positive ripening regulator, decreases ethylene and carotenoid content of the tomato fruit, thereby delaying the ripening of tomato fruit [38]. We observed that overexpression of MdKING1 in tomatoes accelerated fruit ripening and made tomato fruits reach the Br stage earlier (Figure 3A and Figure 4A), and ethylene and carotenoid content of MdKING1 OE tomato fruits was significantly higher than that of WT with the development of fruits (Figure 3C and Figure 5B–D). This result suggested that MdKING1 may play an important role in fruit ripening via increasing ethylene and carotenoid content.
1-MCP is an ethylene signaling inhibitor that acts by irreversibly binding to ethylene receptors and blocking their normal binding to ethylene [59]. Exogenous application of 1-MCP can significantly suppress ethylene production and delay fruit ripening [60]. Wang [61] screened 12 SlWRKY genes by ethylene and 1-MCP treatment, which could respond to ethylene in tomatoes. In tomato fruits, the expression level of SlACS2 was downregulated under 1-MCP treatment conditions, and the silencing of SlACS2 inhibited fruit ripening by inhibiting ethylene, suggesting that SlACS2 was a positive regulator of tomato fruit ripening [39,62]. Similarly, our results showed that WT and MdKING1 OE tomato fruits significantly delayed ripening after 1-MCP treatment. As the treatment process continued, MdKING1 OE tomato fruits showed earlier ripening than WT (Figure 4). Under the treatment conditions of 1-MCP and ethylene, the expression level of MdKING1 was inhibited and induced, respectively (Figure 3E,F). This also implied that MdKING1 may promote fruit ripening by responding to ethylene signaling. Fruit softening is a key component in an irreversible process during fruit ripening [63]. SlLOB1 regulates fruit softening and promotes fruit ripening by upregulating cell-wall-related genes [64]. This is consistent with our finding that expression levels of fruit firmness-regulating genes (SlPG2a, SlPL, and SlCEL2) were significantly increased in MdKING1 OE tomato fruits (Figure 7B), and MdKING1 OE tomato fruits exhibited lower fruit firmness and earlier fruit ripening than WT (Figure 3). Taken together, these results suggest that MdKING1 plays a positive regulatory role in fruit ripening.
Through RNA-seq analysis of MdKING1 OE and WT fruits at the Br stage, the DEGs were enriched in several maturation-related biological processes, including “fruit ripening”, “fruit development”, “ethylene biosynthetic process”, and “ethylene metabolic process” (Figure 6C), which further indicated that MdKING1 was involved in fruit ripening regulation through the ethylene pathway. Phytohormone ethylene has long been considered the main trigger of climacteric fruit ripening [38]. Ethylene biosynthesis involves two key biosynthetic enzymes, ACO and ACS [11]. In tomato fruit, SlACO1 and SlACO3 are gradually induced during ripening, and silencing of SlACS2 inhibits fruit ripening by inhibiting ethylene [62,65]. In our results, ethylene-synthesis-related genes (SlACO1, SlACS2, SlACS4) and ethylene signal transduction-related genes (SlERF2) were significantly induced in the fruits of MdKING1 OE (Figure 6B), which is also consistent with the faster ethylene production and earlier ripening in the fruits of MdKING1 OE. Moreover, transcription factors (TFs) play an important role in fruit ripening [66]. MADS-RIN (or RIN) is a MADS-box transcription factor, and inhibition or knockout of MADS-RIN inhibits ethylene production because MADS-RIN directly targets ACS2, ACS4, and ETR3/NR [67] and directly regulates the expression of ACO1. Ripening of tomato fruits is controlled by a NAC transcription factor, such as non-ripening (NOR). Gene promoter analysis showed that genes involved in ethylene biosynthesis (SlACS2 and SlACS4), color formation (SlGgpps2 and SlSGR1), and cell wall metabolism (SlPG2a, SlPL, SlCEL2, and SlXP1) are direct targets of NOR-like1 [39]. TAGL1 is a critical transcription factor for fruit development and maturation, regulating chloroplast development and carotenoid accumulation in tomato fruits [68]. Similarly, in this study, we found that SlNR, SlNOR, SlRIN, and SlTAGL1 expression in MdKING1 OE fruit was significantly higher than that of WT (Figure 6B). However, SlPL, SlPSY1, SlACO1, SlACS2, and SlACS4 had higher expression levels in the Br +5 stage than in Br and Br +10 stages (Figure 7), which may be determined by the temporal and spatial expression patterns of genes. Ultimately, the expression changes in this series of key ripening-related genes affect the fruit ripening process.
In summary, our results demonstrated that MdKING1 played an important role in promoting fruit ripening by increasing fruit ethylene release and carotenoid accumulation. In addition, RNAseq analysis showed that MdKING1 may promote ethylene-synthesis-related genes (SlACO1, SlACS2, and SlACS4), ethylene signal transduction-related genes (SlERF2), carotenoid metabolism-related genes (SlPSY1 and SlGgpps2), and key regulators of fruit ripening (SlNR, SlNOR, SlRIN, and SlTAGL1) and ultimately promote fruit ripening. This study reveals the positive regulatory function of MdKING1 in fruit ripening and provides a theoretical basis for fruit quality improvement and new cultivar breeding.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12152848/s1, Figure S1. Identification of transgenic tomatoes. (A) Identification of transgenic tomatoes at DNA level; (B) RT-PCR analysis of MdKING1 in wild-type and MdKING1 OE plants. Figure S2. Principal component analysis of transcriptome data. WT represents wild-type, and OE #3 represents MdKING1 OE #3. Each sample had three biological replicates. Figure S3. KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs between wild-type and MdKING1 OE fruits. The top 16 enriched KEGG pathways are exhibited. Table S1. List of primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.Y., C.N. and Q.G.; Methodology, Q.Y.; Formal analysis, Q.Y., J.H. and W.S.; Investigation, Q.Y., X.Y., W.S. and Y.L.; Resources, F.M.; Data curation, Q.Y.; Writing–original draft, Q.Y., X.Y., P.C. and C.N.; Supervision, Q.G.; Funding acquisition, Q.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Central Funds Guiding the Local Science and Technology Development of Shenzhen (2021Szvup117).

Data Availability Statement

The raw sequence data of RNA-seq have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive (NGDC, https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/), accessed on 30 July 2023, under the accession number BioProject ID: PRJCA018698.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the high-performance computing (HPC) platform of Northwest A&F University (NWAFU) for providing computing resources and Zhao Jing (Horticulture Science Research Center, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China) for providing professional technical assistance with HPLC (LC-2030CD, SHIMADZU) analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adams-Phillips, L.; Barry, C.; Giovannoni, J. Signal transduction systems regulating fruit ripening. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhai, Y.; Fan, Z.; Cui, Y.; Gu, X.; Chen, S.; Ma, H. APETALA2/ethylene responsive factor in fruit ripening: Roles, interactions and expression regulation. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 979348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Carrari, F.; Fernie, A.R. Metabolic regulation underlying tomato fruit development. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 1883–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Seymour, G.B.; Østergaard, L.; Chapman, N.H.; Knapp, S.; Martin, C. Fruit Development and Ripening. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64, 219–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Ji, Y.; Wang, A. Recent Advances in Phytohormone Regulation of Apple-Fruit Ripening. Plants 2021, 10, 2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Giovannoni, J. Molecular biology of fruit maturation and ripening. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 2001, 52, 725–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Palma, J.M.; Corpas, F.J.; del Río, L.A. Proteomics as an approach to the understanding of the molecular physiology of fruit development and ripening. J. Proteom. 2011, 74, 1230–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Li, C.; Jia, H.; Chai, Y.; Shen, Y. Abscisic acid perception and signaling transduction in strawberry: A model for non-climacteric fruit ripening. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 1950–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Zhou, L.; Tang, R.; Li, X.; Tian, S.; Li, B.; Qin, G. N6-methyladenosine RNA modification regulates strawberry fruit ripening in an ABA-dependent manner. Genome Biol. 2021, 22, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, T.; Qin, G.; Tian, S. Regulatory network of fruit ripening: Current understanding and future challenges. New Phytol. 2020, 228, 1219–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Palma, J.M.; Freschi, L.; Rodríguez-Ruiz, M.; González-Gordo, S.; Corpas, F.J. Nitric oxide in the physiology and quality of fleshy fruits. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 4405–4417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, A.; Yamakake, J.; Kudo, H.; Wakasa, Y.; Hatsuyama, Y.; Igarashi, M.; Kasai, A.; Li, T.; Harada, T. Null mutation of the MdACS3 gene, coding for a ripening-specific 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase, leads to long shelf life in apple fruit. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151, 391–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Li, T.; Tan, D.; Liu, Z.; Jiang, Z.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, X.; Yuan, H.; Wang, A. Apple MdACS6 Regulates Ethylene Biosynthesis During Fruit Development Involving Ethylene-Responsive Factor. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 1909–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Li, T.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Tan, D.; Wei, Y.; Yuan, H.; Li, T.; Wang, A. Apple (Malus domestica) MdERF2 negatively affects ethylene biosynthesis during fruit ripening by suppressing MdACS1 transcription. Plant J. 2016, 88, 735–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Oeller, P.W.; Lu, M.-W.; Taylor, L.P.; Pike, D.A.; Theologis, A.A. Reversible Inhibition of Tomato Fruit Senescence by Antisense RNA. Science 1991, 254, 437–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hoogstrate, S.W.; van Bussel, L.J.A.; Cristescu, S.M.; Cator, E.; Mariani, C.; Vriezen, W.H.; Rieu, I. Tomato ACS4 is necessary for timely start of and progression through the climacteric phase of fruit ripening. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, Y.-T.; Lee, Y.-R.; Yang, C.-Y.; Wang, Y.-T.; Yang, S.-F.; Shaw, J.-F. A novel papaya ACC oxidase gene (CP-ACO2) associated with late stage fruit ripening and leaf senescence. Plant Sci. 2003, 164, 531–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guo, H.; Ecker, J.R. The ethylene signaling pathway: New insights. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2004, 7, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Broeckx, T.; Hulsmans, S.; Rolland, F. The plant energy sensor: Evolutionary conservation and divergence of SnRK1 structure, regulation, and function. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 6215–6252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Baena-González, E.; Lunn, J.E. SnRK1 and trehalose 6-phosphate—Two ancient pathways converge to regulate plant metabolism and growth. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2020, 55, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ramon, M.; Ruelens, P.; Li, Y.; Sheen, J.; Geuten, K.; Rolland, F. The hybrid four-CBS-domain KINβγ subunit functions as the canonical γ subunit of the plant energy sensor SnRK1. Plant J. 2013, 75, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Punkkinen, M.; Denessiouk, K.; Fujii, H. Arabidopsis KIN gamma subunit 1 has a potential to regulate activity of sucrose nonfermenting 1-related protein kinase 2s (SnRK2s) in vitro. Biol. Plant. 2019, 63, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Jossier, M.; Bouly, J.P.; Meimoun, P.; Arjmand, A.; Lessard, P.; Hawley, S.; Grahame Hardie, D.; Thomas, M. SnRK1 (SNF1-related kinase 1) has a central role in sugar and ABA signalling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2009, 59, 316–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cui, F.; Brosché, M.; Lehtonen, M.T.; Amiryousefi, A.; Xu, E.; Punkkinen, M.; Valkonen, J.P.; Fujii, H.; Overmyer, K. Dissecting Abscisic Acid Signaling Pathways Involved in Cuticle Formation. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 926–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Jia, M.; Li, X.; Wang, W.; Li, T.; Dai, Z.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, K.; Zhu, H.; Mao, W.; Feng, Q.; et al. SnRK2 subfamily I protein kinases regulate ethylene biosynthesis by phosphorylating HB transcription factors to induce ACO1 expression in apple. New Phytol. 2022, 234, 1262–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhou, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhu, H.; Jiang, Y.; Jiang, G.; Qu, H. Energy homeostasis mediated by the LcSnRK1α-LcbZIP1/3 signaling pathway modulates litchi fruit senescence. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2022, 111, 698–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, G.; Peng, F.; Zhang, L.; Shi, X.; Wang, Z. Cloning and characterization of a SnRK1-encoding gene from Malus hupehensis Rehd. and heterologous expression in tomato. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010, 37, 947–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, W.; Peng, F.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, G.; Luo, J. Overexpression of PpSnRK1α in Tomato Promotes Fruit Ripening by Enhancing RIPENING INHIBITOR Regulation Pathway. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Wang, X.; Peng, F.; Li, M.; Yang, L.; Li, G. Expression of a heterologous SnRK1 in tomato increases carbon assimilation, nitrogen uptake and modifies fruit development. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 1173–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Meng, D.; Cao, H.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, M.; Borejsza-Wysocka, E.; Wang, H.; Dandekar, A.M.; Fei, Z.; Cheng, L. SnRK1 kinase-mediated phosphorylation of transcription factor bZIP39 regulates sorbitol metabolism in apple. Plant Physiol. 2023, 192, 2123–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Velasco, R.; Zharkikh, A.; Affourtit, J.; Dhingra, A.; Cestaro, A.; Kalyanaraman, A.; Fontana, P.; Bhatnagar, S.K.; Troggio, M.; Pruss, D.; et al. The genome of the domesticated apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Nat. Genet. 2010, 42, 833–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Yue, Q.; He, J.; Yang, X.; Cheng, P.; Khan, A.; Shen, W.; Song, Y.; Wang, S.; Ma, F.; Guan, Q. Transcriptomic Analysis Revealed the Discrepancy between Early-Ripening ‘Geneva Early’ and Late-Ripening ‘Hanfu’ Apple Cultivars during Fruit Development and Ripening. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Changwal, C.; Shukla, T.; Hussain, Z.; Singh, N.; Kar, A.; Singh, V.P.; Abdin, M.Z.; Arora, A. Regulation of Postharvest Tomato Fruit Ripening by Endogenous Salicylic Acid. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 663943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, S.; Zhu, B.; Pirrello, J.; Xu, C.; Zhang, B.; Bouzayen, M.; Chen, K.; Grierson, D. Roles of RIN and ethylene in tomato fruit ripening and ripening-associated traits. New Phytol. 2020, 226, 460–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Paul, V.; Pandey, R. Role of internal atmosphere on fruit ripening and storability-a review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 1223–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Sisler, E.C.; Serek, M. Inhibitors of ethylene responses in plants at the receptor level: Recent developments. Physiol. Plant. 1997, 100, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, L.H.; Zabaras, D.; Bennett, L.E.; Aguas, P.; Woonton, B.W. Effects of UV-C, red light and sun light on the carotenoid content and physical qualities of tomatoes during post-harvest storage. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 495–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Deng, H.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Shu, P.; Wang, R.; Hao, Y.; Su, D.; Pirrello, J.; Liu, Y.; et al. SlERF.F12 modulates the transition to ripening in tomato fruit by recruiting the co-repressor TOPLESS and histone deacetylases to repress key ripening genes. Plant Cell 2022, 34, 1250–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gao, Y.; Wei, W.; Zhao, X.; Tan, X.; Fan, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Jing, Y.; Meng, L.; Zhu, B.; Zhu, H.; et al. A NAC transcription factor, NOR-like1, is a new positive regulator of tomato fruit ripening. Hortic. Res. 2018, 5, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ampomah-Dwamena, C.; Tomes, S.; Thrimawithana, A.H.; Elborough, C.; Bhargava, N.; Rebstock, R.; Sutherland, P.; Ireland, H.; Allan, A.C.; Espley, R.V. Overexpression of PSY1 increases fruit skin and flesh carotenoid content and reveals associated transcription factors in apple (Malus × domestica). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 967143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, D.; Samsulrizal, N.H.; Yan, C.; Allcock, N.S.; Craigon, J.; Blanco-Ulate, B.; Ortega-Salazar, I.; Marcus, S.E.; Bagheri, H.M.; Perez Fons, L.; et al. Characterization of CRISPR Mutants Targeting Genes Modulating Pectin Degradation in Ripening Tomato. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 179, 544–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Llop-Tous, I.; Domínguez-Puigjaner, E.; Palomer, X.; Vendrell, M. Characterization of two divergent endo-beta-1,4-glucanase cDNA clones highly expressed in the nonclimacteric strawberry fruit. Plant Physiol. 1999, 119, 1415–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Vrebalov, J.; Ruezinsky, D.M.; Padmanabhan, V.; White, R.; Medrano, D.R.; Drake, R.; Schuch, W.W.; Giovannoni, J.G. A MADS-Box Gene Necessary for Fruit Ripening at the Tomato Ripening-Inhibitor (Rin) Locus. Science 2002, 296, 343–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Itkin, M.; Seybold, H.; Breitel, D.; Rogachev, I.; Meir, S.; Aharoni, A. TOMATO AGAMOUS-LIKE 1 is a component of the fruit ripening regulatory network. Plant J. 2009, 60, 1081–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Fantini, E.; Falcone, G.; Frusciante, S.; Giliberto, L.; Giuliano, G. Dissection of Tomato Lycopene Biosynthesis through Virus-Induced Gene Silencing. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 986–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chang, S.; Puryear, J.; Cairney, J. A simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees. Plant Mol. Biol. Report. 1993, 11, 113–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Niu, C.; Jiang, L.; Cao, F.; Liu, C.; Guo, J.; Zhang, Z.; Yue, Q.; Hou, N.; Liu, Z.; Li, X.; et al. Methylation of a MITE insertion in the MdRFNR1-1 promoter is positively associated with its allelic expression in apple in response to drought stress. Plant Cell 2022, 34, 3983–4006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cheng, P.; Yue, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, S.; Khan, A.; Yang, X.; He, J.; Wang, S.; Shen, W.; Qian, Q.; et al. Application of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) improves fruit quality and rootstock drought tolerance in apple. J. Plant Physiol. 2023, 280, 153890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Raudvere, U.; Kolberg, L.; Kuzmin, I.; Arak, T.; Adler, P.; Peterson, H.; Vilo, J. g:Profiler: A web server for functional enrichment analysis and conversions of gene lists (2019 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W191–W198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Asif, M.H.; Lakhwani, D.; Pathak, S.; Gupta, P.; Bag, S.K.; Nath, P.; Trivedi, P.K. Transcriptome analysis of ripe and unripe fruit tissue of banana identifies major metabolic networks involved in fruit ripening process. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Li, S.; Li, K.; Ju, Z.; Cao, D.; Fu, D.; Zhu, H.; Zhu, B.; Luo, Y. Genome-wide analysis of tomato NF-Y factors and their role in fruit ripening. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Hedbacker, K.; Carlson, M. SNF1/AMPK pathways in yeast. Front. Biosci. 2008, 13, 2408–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Halford, N.G.; Hey, S.; Jhurreea, D.; Laurie, S.; McKibbin, R.S.; Paul, M.; Zhang, Y. Metabolic signalling and carbon partitioning: Role of Snf1-related (SnRK1) protein kinase. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Li, S.; Chen, K.; Grierson, D. Molecular and Hormonal Mechanisms Regulating Fleshy Fruit Ripening. Cells 2021, 10, 1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Xu, J.; Yan, J.; Li, W.; Wang, Q.; Wang, C.; Guo, J.; Geng, D.; Guan, Q.; Ma, F. Integrative Analyses of Widely Targeted Metabolic Profiling and Transcriptome Data Reveals Molecular Insight into Metabolomic Variations during Apple (Malus domestica) Fruit Development and Ripening. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Saladié, M.; Matas, A.J.; Isaacson, T.; Jenks, M.A.; Goodwin, S.M.; Niklas, K.J.; Xiaolin, R.; Labavitch, J.M.; Shackel, K.A.; Fernie, A.R.; et al. A reevaluation of the key factors that influence tomato fruit softening and integrity. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 1012–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Khoo, H.E.; Prasad, K.N.; Kong, K.W.; Jiang, Y.; Ismail, A. Carotenoids and their isomers: Color pigments in fruits and vegetables. Molecules 2011, 16, 1710–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Guo, T.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, C.; Wang, N.; Jiang, Q.; Wu, J.; Ma, F.; Liu, C. Overexpression of MdARD4 Accelerates Fruit Ripening and Increases Cold Hardiness in Tomato. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Phuong, N.; Le, T.; Vissenaekens, H.; Gonzales, G.B.; Camp, J.; Smagghe, G.; Raes, K. In vitro antioxidant activity and phenolic profiles of tropical fruit by-products. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 1169–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yang, Y.Y.; Shan, W.; Kuang, J.F.; Chen, J.Y.; Lu, W.J. Four HD-ZIPs are involved in banana fruit ripening by activating the transcription of ethylene biosynthetic and cell wall-modifying genes. Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 39, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, L.; Zhang, X.L.; Wang, L.; Tian, Y.; Jia, N.; Chen, S.; Shi, N.B.; Huang, X.; Zhou, C.; Yu, Y.; et al. Regulation of ethylene-responsive SlWRKYs involved in color change during tomato fruit ripening. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Yang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, C.; Chen, L.; Ma, J.; Sheng, J.; Shen, L. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis delayed mature-green tomato fruits ripening induced by inhibition of ethylene. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 211, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shi, Y.; Li, B.-J.; Grierson, D.; Chen, K.-S. Insights into cell wall changes during fruit softening from transgenic and naturally occurring mutants. Plant Physiol. 2023, 192, 1671–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Shi, Y.; Vrebalov, J.; Zheng, H.; Xu, Y.; Yin, X.; Liu, W.; Liu, Z.; Sorensen, I.; Su, G.; Ma, Q.; et al. A tomato LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES transcription factor, SlLOB1, predominantly regulates cell wall and softening components of ripening. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2102486118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Alexander, L.; Grierson, D. Ethylene biosynthesis and action in tomato: A model for climacteric fruit ripening. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 2039–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wu, J.; Fu, L.; Yi, H. Genome-Wide Identification of the Transcription Factors Involved in Citrus Fruit Ripening from the Transcriptomes of a Late-Ripening Sweet Orange Mutant and Its Wild Type. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Zhong, S.; Fei, Z.; Chen, Y.R.; Zheng, Y.; Huang, M.; Vrebalov, J.; McQuinn, R.; Gapper, N.; Liu, B.; Xiang, J.; et al. Single-base resolution methylomes of tomato fruit development reveal epigenome modifications associated with ripening. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, G.; Li, C.; Yu, H.; Tao, P.; Yuan, L.; Ye, J.; Chen, W.; Wang, Y.; Ge, P.; Zhang, J.; et al. GREEN STRIPE, encoding methylated TOMATO AGAMOUS-LIKE 1, regulates chloroplast development and Chl synthesis in fruit. New Phytol. 2020, 228, 302–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 12 02848 g001
Figure 1. The expression patterns of MD06G1142700 are consistent with fruit development in apples. (A) Expression levels of MdKING1 during fruit development at different periods in apple cultivars “Geneva Early” and “Hanfu”. (B) MD06G1142700 expression levels in early-ripening cultivars. (C) MD06G1142700 expression levels in late-ripening cultivars. Fragments per kilobase per million mapped fragments (FPKM) of MD06G1142700 in different fruit development stages and different tissues were retrieved from the previous data. Error bars indicate SD (n = 3). Statistical significance analysis was determined using Student’s two-tailed t test (* p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001; ns, no significance).
Figure 1. The expression patterns of MD06G1142700 are consistent with fruit development in apples. (A) Expression levels of MdKING1 during fruit development at different periods in apple cultivars “Geneva Early” and “Hanfu”. (B) MD06G1142700 expression levels in early-ripening cultivars. (C) MD06G1142700 expression levels in late-ripening cultivars. Fragments per kilobase per million mapped fragments (FPKM) of MD06G1142700 in different fruit development stages and different tissues were retrieved from the previous data. Error bars indicate SD (n = 3). Statistical significance analysis was determined using Student’s two-tailed t test (* p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001; ns, no significance).
Plants 12 02848 g001
Plants 12 02848 g002
Figure 2. MdKING1 (MD06G1142700) is the homologous of SnRK1 γ subunit in apple. (A) Sequence alignment of KING1 (KINγ) proteins in apple, tomato, and Arabidopsis; the predicted CBS domains are indicated by squares. (B) Phylogenetic analysis of KING1 (KINγ) proteins, SlKING protein, and other SnRK1 subunits in Arabidopsis. The numbers at the nodes of the branches represent bootstrap values. Md, Malus domestica; Sl, Solanum lycopersicum L.; At, Arabidopsis thaliana. Accession numbers are as follows: MdKING1 (MD06G1142700), SlKING1 (Solyc03g111310.3.1), AtSnRKα1 (At3g01090), AtSnRKα2 (At3g29160), AtSnRKα3 (At5g394400), AtSnRKβ1 (At5g21170), AtSnRKβ2 (At4g16360), AtSnRKβ3 (At2g28060), and AtKINγ (AT3G48530). The orange, red, black, and gray bars represent the 4 CBS domains. The red triangle remarks the protein of MdKING1.
Figure 2. MdKING1 (MD06G1142700) is the homologous of SnRK1 γ subunit in apple. (A) Sequence alignment of KING1 (KINγ) proteins in apple, tomato, and Arabidopsis; the predicted CBS domains are indicated by squares. (B) Phylogenetic analysis of KING1 (KINγ) proteins, SlKING protein, and other SnRK1 subunits in Arabidopsis. The numbers at the nodes of the branches represent bootstrap values. Md, Malus domestica; Sl, Solanum lycopersicum L.; At, Arabidopsis thaliana. Accession numbers are as follows: MdKING1 (MD06G1142700), SlKING1 (Solyc03g111310.3.1), AtSnRKα1 (At3g01090), AtSnRKα2 (At3g29160), AtSnRKα3 (At5g394400), AtSnRKβ1 (At5g21170), AtSnRKβ2 (At4g16360), AtSnRKβ3 (At2g28060), and AtKINγ (AT3G48530). The orange, red, black, and gray bars represent the 4 CBS domains. The red triangle remarks the protein of MdKING1.
Plants 12 02848 g002
Plants 12 02848 g003
Figure 3. Overexpressing MdKING1 in tomatoes accelerates fruit ripening. (A) Morphology of wild type (AC) and MdKING1 OE tomato fruits at the mature green (MG) and breaker (Br) stages. (B) Color development in wild-type and overexpressing MdKING1 tomato fruits. Pericarp color (L*, a*, b*), measured with a handheld colorimeter using the CIE L*a*b* color system, L* indicates lightness, a* indicates red to green, and b* indicates yellow to blue. (C,D) Determination of ethylene (ETH) production and fruit firmness of wild-type and MdKING1 OE tomato fruits at MG and Br stages. (E,F) Accumulation of the MdKING1 gene transcripts in WT fruit after treatment with 1-MCP or ethrel. Error bars indicate SD (n = 15 in (B), n = 3 in (C–F)). Asterisks indicate the significant differences between the MdKING1 OE fruits and the wild-type in each group (* p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001; ns, no significance).
Figure 3. Overexpressing MdKING1 in tomatoes accelerates fruit ripening. (A) Morphology of wild type (AC) and MdKING1 OE tomato fruits at the mature green (MG) and breaker (Br) stages. (B) Color development in wild-type and overexpressing MdKING1 tomato fruits. Pericarp color (L*, a*, b*), measured with a handheld colorimeter using the CIE L*a*b* color system, L* indicates lightness, a* indicates red to green, and b* indicates yellow to blue. (C,D) Determination of ethylene (ETH) production and fruit firmness of wild-type and MdKING1 OE tomato fruits at MG and Br stages. (E,F) Accumulation of the MdKING1 gene transcripts in WT fruit after treatment with 1-MCP or ethrel. Error bars indicate SD (n = 15 in (B), n = 3 in (C–F)). Asterisks indicate the significant differences between the MdKING1 OE fruits and the wild-type in each group (* p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001; ns, no significance).
Plants 12 02848 g003
Plants 12 02848 g004
Figure 4. Overexpressing MdKING1 in tomatoes reduced the fruits sensitivity to 1-MCP treatment. (A) Morphology of wild-type and MdKING1 OE tomato fruits at 0, 2, 5, 10, and 14 days after control and 1-MCP treatment, respectively. DAT represents days after treatment. (B) Days from treatment beginning to color change stage in wild-type and MdKING1 OE fruits under control conditions and 1-MCP treatment conditions, respectively. Air treatment was used as a control. Error bars indicate SD (n = 10). Asterisks indicate the significant differences between the MdKING1 OE fruits and the wild-type in each group (*** p ≤ 0.001).
Figure 4. Overexpressing MdKING1 in tomatoes reduced the fruits sensitivity to 1-MCP treatment. (A) Morphology of wild-type and MdKING1 OE tomato fruits at 0, 2, 5, 10, and 14 days after control and 1-MCP treatment, respectively. DAT represents days after treatment. (B) Days from treatment beginning to color change stage in wild-type and MdKING1 OE fruits under control conditions and 1-MCP treatment conditions, respectively. Air treatment was used as a control. Error bars indicate SD (n = 10). Asterisks indicate the significant differences between the MdKING1 OE fruits and the wild-type in each group (*** p ≤ 0.001).
Plants 12 02848 g004
Plants 12 02848 g005
Figure 5. Several important indexes of fruit ripening in wild-type and MdKING1 OE fruits. (A–D) Chlorophyll, lycopene, β-carotenoids, and lutein content at different days after treatment under control conditions, respectively. (E–H) Chlorophyll, lycopene, β-carotenoids, and lutein content at different days after 1-MCP treatment, respectively. Error bars indicate SD (n = 3). Asterisks indicate the significant differences between the MdKING1 OE fruits and the wild-type in each group (* p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001; ns, no significance).
Figure 5. Several important indexes of fruit ripening in wild-type and MdKING1 OE fruits. (A–D) Chlorophyll, lycopene, β-carotenoids, and lutein content at different days after treatment under control conditions, respectively. (E–H) Chlorophyll, lycopene, β-carotenoids, and lutein content at different days after 1-MCP treatment, respectively. Error bars indicate SD (n = 3). Asterisks indicate the significant differences between the MdKING1 OE fruits and the wild-type in each group (* p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001; ns, no significance).
Plants 12 02848 g005
Plants 12 02848 g006
Figure 6. Transcriptome profiling analysis of wild-type and MdKING1 OE fruits at Br stage. (A) Volcano map of differentially expressed genes (DEGs, log2 (fold change) ≥ 1) between wild-type and MdKING1 OE fruits. Up and down refer to the upregulated and downregulated DEGs, respectively. (B) Heatmap analysis of the fruit ripening-related DEGs between wild-type and MdKING1 OE fruits. (C) GO enrichment analysis of DEGs between wild-type and MdKING1 OE fruits.
Figure 6. Transcriptome profiling analysis of wild-type and MdKING1 OE fruits at Br stage. (A) Volcano map of differentially expressed genes (DEGs, log2 (fold change) ≥ 1) between wild-type and MdKING1 OE fruits. Up and down refer to the upregulated and downregulated DEGs, respectively. (B) Heatmap analysis of the fruit ripening-related DEGs between wild-type and MdKING1 OE fruits. (C) GO enrichment analysis of DEGs between wild-type and MdKING1 OE fruits.
Plants 12 02848 g006
Plants 12 02848 g007
Figure 7. Expression profiles of ethylene biosynthesis, carotenoid biosynthesis, and fruit firmness-related genes affected by MdKING1 overexpression in tomato fruits at Br, Br +5, and Br +10 stages. (A–C) The relative expression level of ethylene biosynthesis-related genes. (D) The relative expression level of carotenoid biosynthesis gene. (E) The relative expression level of cell wall metabolism-related gene. Br, Br +5, and Br +10 represent breaker stage, 5 days after breaker stage, and 10 days after breaker stage, respectively. Error bars indicate SD (n = 3). Asterisks indicate the significant differences between the MdKING1 OE fruits and the wild-type in each group (** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001).
Figure 7. Expression profiles of ethylene biosynthesis, carotenoid biosynthesis, and fruit firmness-related genes affected by MdKING1 overexpression in tomato fruits at Br, Br +5, and Br +10 stages. (A–C) The relative expression level of ethylene biosynthesis-related genes. (D) The relative expression level of carotenoid biosynthesis gene. (E) The relative expression level of cell wall metabolism-related gene. Br, Br +5, and Br +10 represent breaker stage, 5 days after breaker stage, and 10 days after breaker stage, respectively. Error bars indicate SD (n = 3). Asterisks indicate the significant differences between the MdKING1 OE fruits and the wild-type in each group (** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001).
Plants 12 02848 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yue, Q.; Yang, X.; Cheng, P.; He, J.; Shen, W.; Li, Y.; Ma, F.; Niu, C.; Guan, Q. Heterologous Overexpression of Apple MdKING1 Promotes Fruit Ripening in Tomato. Plants 2023, 12, 2848. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12152848

AMA Style

Yue Q, Yang X, Cheng P, He J, Shen W, Li Y, Ma F, Niu C, Guan Q. Heterologous Overexpression of Apple MdKING1 Promotes Fruit Ripening in Tomato. Plants. 2023; 12(15):2848. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12152848

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yue, Qianyu, Xinyue Yang, Pengda Cheng, Jieqiang He, Wenyun Shen, Yixuan Li, Fengwang Ma, Chundong Niu, and Qingmei Guan. 2023. "Heterologous Overexpression of Apple MdKING1 Promotes Fruit Ripening in Tomato" Plants 12, no. 15: 2848. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12152848

APA Style

Yue, Q., Yang, X., Cheng, P., He, J., Shen, W., Li, Y., Ma, F., Niu, C., & Guan, Q. (2023). Heterologous Overexpression of Apple MdKING1 Promotes Fruit Ripening in Tomato. Plants, 12(15), 2848. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12152848

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop