A Comprehensive Insight into Māmaki (Pipturus albidus): Its Ethnomedicinal Heritage, Human Health Research, and Phytochemical Properties
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Physical Characteristics of Māmaki
3. Ecological Characteristics of Māmaki
4. Agricultural Propagation, Challenges, and Commercial Industry
5. Cultural and Medicinal Use of Māmaki
6. Anti-Microbial, Anti-Viral, and Anti-Fungal Activity of Māmaki
7. Chemopreventive and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Māmaki Leaves and Extracts
8. Nutrient and Mineral Profile of Dried Māmaki Leaves
9. Nutritional and Mineral Content of Māmaki Dried Leaf Tea Infusions
10. Antioxidant Content of Māmaki Leaves and Infusions
11. Future Directions and Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Price, J.P.; Gon, S.M., III; Jacobi, J.D.; Matsuwaki, D. Mapping Plant Species Ranges in the Hawaiian Islands: Developing a Methodology and Associated GIS Layers; University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa: Honolulu, HI, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Brendler, T. Mamaki—Past & Present. American Botanical Council 2022, 32, 32–41. [Google Scholar]
- POWO. Plants of the World Online. Available online: https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:855908-1 (accessed on 28 July 2023).
- Wagner, W.L.; Herbst, D.R.; Sohmer, S.H. Manual of the Flowering Plants of Hawaii: Revised Edition; University of Hawaii Press: Honolulu, HI, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Kaaiakamanu, D.M.; Akina, J.K. Hawaiian Herbs of Medicinal Value: Found Among the Mountains and Elsewhere in the Hawaiian Islands, and Known to the Hawaiians to Possess Curative and Palliative Properties Most Effective in Removing Physical Ailments; Board of Health of the Territory of Hawaii: Honolulu, HI, USA, 1922; p. 74. [Google Scholar]
- Locher, C.P.; Burch, M.T.; Mower, H.F.; Berestecky, J.; Davis, H.; Van Poel, B.; Lasure, A.; Vanden Berghe, D.A.; Vlietinck, A.J. Anti-microbial activity and anti-complement activity of extracts obtained from selected Hawaiian medicinal plants. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1995, 49, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kartika, H.; Shido, J.; Nakamoto, S.T.; Li, Q.X.; Iwaoka, W.T. Nutrient and mineral composition of dried mamaki leaves (Pipturus albidus) and infusions. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2011, 24, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Locher, C.P.; Witvrouw, M.; De Bethune, M.P.; Burch, M.T.; Mower, H.F.; Davis, H.; Lasure, A.; Pauwels, R.; De Clercq, E.; Vlietinck, A.J. Antiviral activity of Hawaiian medicinal plants against human immunodeficiency Virus Type-1 (HIV-1). Phytomedicine 1996, 2, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, A.; Kondratyuk, T.; Wongwiwatthananukit, S.; Sun, D.; Chang, L.C. Investigation of Antioxidant, Anticancer, and Chemopreventive Properties of Hawaiian Grown Māmaki tea (Pipturus albidus). Nat. Prod. Commun. 2022, 17, 1934578X221080945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MacCaughey, V. The Hawaiian Elepaio. Auk 1919, 36, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swezey, O.H. Entomological Papers; The Springfield Publishing Company: Springfield, OH, USA, 1904. [Google Scholar]
- Sakai, H.F.; Carpenter, J.R. The Variety and Nutritional Value of Foods Consumed by Hawaiian Crow Nestlings, an Endangered Species. Condor 1990, 92, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kaufman, L. Life History, Seasonal Phenology, and Parasitoids of the Hawaiian Endemic Moth Udea Stellata (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2009, 102, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Leeper, J.R.; Hall, G.; Way, M. Vanessa tameamea Esch. and Related Introduced Species: Citations in the Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society (1906–2012); University of Hawaii at Manoa, CTAHR: Honolulu, HI, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Kartika, H.; Li, Q.x.; Wall, M.m.; Nakamoto, S.t.; Iwaoka, W.t. Major Phenolic Acids and Total Antioxidant Activity in Mamaki Leaves, Pipturus albidus. J. Food Sci. 2007, 72, S696–S701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bendes, M.S. Impacts of Root Competition on Growth of Woody Species in Mixed Agroforestry Systems; University of Hawai’i at Manoa: Honolulu, HI, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Little, E.; Skolmen, R. Common Forest Trees of Hawaii, Native and Introduced; US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: Champaign, IL, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Hanapi, R.H. Kahua Kukui: Ethnobotany of the Hawaiians; Honolulu Botanical Gardens, Hoʻomaluhia Botanical Garden: Honolulu, HI, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Handy, E.S.C.; Pukui, M.K.; Handy, E.G. The Polynesian Family System in Ka-’U, Hawai’i: Viii.—Ka-’U, Hawai’i, in Ecological and Historical Perspective. J. Polyn. Soc. 1955, 64, 56–101. [Google Scholar]
- Krauss, B.H. Plants in Hawaiian Medicine; Bess Press: Honolulu, HI, USA, 2001; p. 164. [Google Scholar]
- Culliney, J.L.; Koebele, B.P. A Native Hawaiian Garden: How to Grow and Care for Island Plants; University of Hawaii Press: Honolulu, HI, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Karabourniotis, G.; Horner, H.T.; Bresta, P.; Nikolopoulos, D.; Liakopoulos, G. New insights into the functions of carbon–calcium inclusions in plants. New Phytol. 2020, 228, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sperry, J.H.; O’Hearn, D.; Drake, D.R.; Hruska, A.M.; Case, S.B.; Vizentin-Bugoni, J.; Arnett, C.; Chambers, T.; Tarwater, C.E. Fruit and seed traits of native and invasive plant species in Hawai‘i: Implications for seed dispersal by non-native birds. Biol. Invasions 2021, 23, 1819–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sugano, J.; Okumura, L.; Silva, J.; Uyeda, J.; Wang, K.H. Scaling Up Mamaki (Pipturus albidus) in Non-Forest Areas for Commercial Production. 2018. Available online: https://gms.ctahr.hawaii.edu/gs/handler/getmedia.ashx?moid=30970&dt=3&g=12 (accessed on 3 March 2023).
- Cordell, S.; Ostertag, R.; Rowe, B.; Sweinhart, L.; Vasquez-Radonic, L.; Michaud, J.; Cole, T.C.; Schulten, J.R. Evaluating barriers to native seedling establishment in an invaded Hawaiian lowland wet forest. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142, 2997–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ainsworth, A.; Boone Kauffman, J. Response of native Hawaiian woody species to lava-ignited wildfires in tropical forests and shrublands. In Forest Ecology: Recent Advances in Plant Ecology; Van der Valk, A.G., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 197–209. [Google Scholar]
- Ainsworth, A. Interactive influences of wildfire and nonnative species on plant community succession in Hawaii Volcanoes National Park. Master’s Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Drake, D.R. Relationships among the seed rain, seed bank and vegetation of a Hawaiian forest. J. Veg. Sci. 1998, 9, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McDaniel, S.; Ostertag, R. Strategic light manipulation as a restoration strategy to reduce alien grasses and encourage native regeneration in Hawaiian mesic forests. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2010, 13, 280–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Riper, C.; Scott, J.M. Observations on Distribution, Diet, and Breeding of the Hawaiian Thrush. Condor 1979, 81, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krushelnycky, P.D. Ecology of some lesser-studied introduced ant species in Hawaiian forests. J. Insect Conserv. 2015, 19, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demers, J.E.; McKemy, J.M.; Bushe, B.; Conant, P.; Kumashira, B.; Ko, M.; Castlebury, L.A. First Report of Rust Caused by Pucciniastrum boehmeriae on Māmaki (Pipturus albidus) in Hawaii. Plant Dis. 2014, 98, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shiels, A.B.; Ennis, M.K.; Shiels, L. Trait-based plant mortality and preference for native versus non-native seedlings by invasive slug and snail herbivores in Hawaii. Biol. Invasions 2014, 16, 1929–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Au, M.G.; Wright, M.G. Ramie Moth, Arcte coerula (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): A New Invasive Pest in Hawaii on Endemic Plants. 2022. Available online: https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/2be0fdbe-a7a5-4113-bd5d-514da082a5a4/content (accessed on 28 March 2023).
- Nicharat, S.; Gillett, G.W. A Review of the Taxonomy of Hawaiian Pipturus (Urticaceae) by Anatomical and Cytological Evidence. Brittonia 1970, 22, 191–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donoghue, C. Agroforestry Development Planning in State Correctional Facilities. 2020. Available online: https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/92f29a71-a089-4f23-aca9-9e3ec42a17fe/content (accessed on 2 April 2023).
- Lennard, F.; Mills, A. Material Approaches to Polynesian Barkcloth: Cloth, Collections, Communities; Sidestone Press: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Hilgenkamp, K.; Pescaia, C.; Health, W. Traditional Hawaiian Healing and Western Influence. Californian J. Health Promot. 2003, 1, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pang, B. Identification of Plant Fibers in Hawaiian Kapa: From Ethnology to Botany; University of Hawai’i at Manoa: Honolulu, HI, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Brigham, W.T. Ka Hana Kapa: The Making of Bark-Cloth in Hawaii. Bishhop Museum Press: Honolulu, HI, USA, 1911; p. 456. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, M.J.; Holmes-Smith, A.S.; Lennard, F. Development of non-destructive methodology using ATR-FTIR with PCA to differentiate between historical Pacific barkcloth. J. Cult. Herit. 2019, 39, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aneke, C.I.; Otranto, D.; Cafarchia, C. Therapy and Antifungal Susceptibility Profile of Microsporum canis. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Blutfield, M.S.; Lohre, J.M.; Pawich, D.A.; Vlahovic, T.C. The Immunologic Response to Trichophyton Rubrum in Lower Extremity Fungal Infections. J. Fungi 2015, 1, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Haneke, E. Fungal infections of the nail. Semin. Dermatol. 1991, 10, 41–53. [Google Scholar]
- Xia, L.; Tan, S.; Zhou, Y.; Lin, J.; Wang, H.; Oyang, L.; Tian, Y.; Liu, L.; Su, M.; Wang, H.; et al. Role of the NFκB-signaling pathway in cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2018, 11, 2063–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lawrence, T. The nuclear factor NF-kappaB pathway in inflammation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2009, 1, a001651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sharma, J.N.; Al-Omran, A.; Parvathy, S.S. Role of nitric oxide in inflammatory diseases. Inflammopharmacology 2007, 15, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korde Choudhari, S.; Chaudhary, M.; Bagde, S.; Gadbail, A.R.; Joshi, V. Nitric oxide and cancer: A review. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2013, 11, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Taciak, B.; Białasek, M.; Braniewska, A.; Sas, Z.; Sawicka, P.; Kiraga, Ł.; Rygiel, T.; Król, M. Evaluation of phenotypic and functional stability of RAW 264.7 cell line through serial passages. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0198943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luanpitpong, S.; Chanvorachote, P. Nitric Oxide and Aggressive Behavior of Lung Cancer Cells. Anticancer Res. 2015, 35, 4585–4592. [Google Scholar]
- Napoli, C.; de Nigris, F.; Williams-Ignarro, S.; Pignalosa, O.; Sica, V.; Ignarro, L.J. Nitric oxide and atherosclerosis: An update. Nitric Oxide 2006, 15, 265–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmieri, E.M.; McGinity, C.; Wink, D.A.; McVicar, D.W. Nitric Oxide in Macrophage Immunometabolism: Hiding in Plain Sight. Metabolites 2020, 10, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martemucci, G.; Costagliola, C.; Mariano, M.; D’andrea, L.; Napolitano, P.; D’Alessandro, A.G. Free Radical Properties, Source and Targets, Antioxidant Consumption and Health. Oxygen 2022, 2, 48–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zehiroglu, C.; Ozturk Sarikaya, S.B. The importance of antioxidants and place in today’s scientific and technological studies. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 4757–4774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, N.; Goel, N. Phenolic acids: Natural versatile molecules with promising therapeutic applications. Biotechnol. Rep. 2019, 24, e00370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasouli, H.; Farzaei, M.H.; Khodarahmi, R. Polyphenols and their benefits: A review. Int. J. Food Prop. 2017, 20, 1700–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ganeshpurkar, A.; Saluja, A.K. The Pharmacological Potential of Rutin. Saudi Pharm. J. 2017, 25, 149–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Naveed, M.; Hejazi, V.; Abbas, M.; Kamboh, A.A.; Khan, G.J.; Shumzaid, M.; Ahmad, F.; Babazadeh, D.; FangFang, X.; Modarresi-Ghazani, F.; et al. Chlorogenic acid (CGA): A pharmacological review and call for further research. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 97, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedro, A.C.; Maciel, G.M.; Rampazzo Ribeiro, V.; Haminiuk, C.W.I. Fundamental and applied aspects of catechins from different sources: A review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 429–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chacko, S.M.; Thambi, P.T.; Kuttan, R.; Nishigaki, I. Beneficial effects of green tea: A literature review. Chin. Med. 2010, 5, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- de Vasconcellos, A.C.; Frazzon, J.; Zapata Noreña, C.P. Phenolic compounds present in Yerba mate potentially increase human health: A critical review. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2022, 77, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chopra, A.S.; Lordan, R.; Horbańczuk, O.K.; Atanasov, A.G.; Chopra, I.; Horbańczuk, J.O.; Jóźwik, A.; Huang, L.; Pirgozliev, V.; Banach, M.; et al. The current use and evolving landscape of nutraceuticals. Pharmacol. Res. 2022, 175, 106001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clutter, D.S.; Jordan, M.R.; Bertagnolio, S.; Shafer, R.W. HIV-1 drug resistance and resistance testing. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2016, 46, 292–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Banerjee, S.; Biehl, A.; Gadina, M.; Hasni, S.; Schwartz, D.M. JAK-STAT Signaling as a Target for Inflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases: Current and Future Prospects. Drugs 2017, 77, 521–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braicu, C.; Buse, M.; Busuioc, C.; Drula, R.; Gulei, D.; Raduly, L.; Rusu, A.; Irimie, A.; Atanasov, A.G.; Slaby, O.; et al. A Comprehensive Review on MAPK: A Promising Therapeutic Target in Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brooks, A.J.; Putoczki, T. JAK-STAT Signalling Pathway in Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Deng, H.; Cui, H.; Fang, J.; Zuo, Z.; Deng, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhao, L. Inflammatory responses and inflammation-associated diseases in organs. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 7204–7218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
P. albidus (Māmaki) Extract/Infusion (20 µg/mL) | Inhibition of Proinflammatory NF-κB Signaling Pathway (Luciferase Assay; HEK-293 Reporter Cell Line) | Inhibition of Nitric Oxide Formation (Nitrite Assay; Mouse LPS Stimulated RAW 264.7 Macrophage Cells) | Lung Cancer Cells (LU-1) and Breast Cancer Cells (MCF-1) SRBF Cytotoxicity Assay |
---|---|---|---|
Powdered Freeze- Dried (FD) Māmaki H2O Infusions | H2O FD powder infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in 27.4 ± 10.9% inhibition of NF-κB activity and a HEK-293 percent survival of 82.4 ± 2.6% | H2O FD powder infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a 55.5 ± 0.4% inhibition of NO and a RAW 264.7 macrophage percent survival of 54.9 ± 16.0% | H2O FD powder infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a percent survival of 84.2 ± 2.0% of LU-1 and 80.1 ± 7.1% MCF-7 cell lines following a 72 h treatment period |
H2O FD powder infusion prepared at 60 °C resulted in 28.9 ± 3.3% inhibition of NF-κB activity and an HEK-293 percent survival of 90.2 ± 5.5% | H2O FD powder infusion prepared at 60 °C resulted in a 44.5 ± 10.8% inhibition of NO and a RAW 264.7 macrophage percent survival of 86.6 ± 15.8% | H2O FD powder infusion prepared at 60 °C resulted in a percent survival of 95.8 ± 5.0% of LU-1 and 95.2 ± 9.2% MCF-7 cell lines following a 72 h treatment period | |
H2O FD powder infusion prepared at 100 °C resulted in 54.9 ± 1.0% inhibition of NF-κB activity and an HEK-293 percent survival of 90.6 ± 8.0% | H2O FD powder infusion prepared at 100 °C resulted in a 39.0 ± 14.9% inhibition of NO and a RAW 264.7 macrophage percent survival of 96.6 ± 7.4% | H2O FD powder infusion prepared at 100 °C resulted in a percent survival of 94.1 ± 8.9% of LU-1 and 96.0 ± 6.1% MCF-7 cell lines following a 72 h treatment period | |
Powdered Freeze- Dried (FD) Māmaki Ethanol Infusions | 70% Ethanol FD powder infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in 56.9 ± 7.0% inhibition of NF-κB activity and an HEK-293 percent survival of 102.0 ± 9.7% | 70% ethanol FD powder infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a 38.2 ± 5.6% inhibition of NO and a RAW 264.7 macrophage percent survival of 96.2 ± 9.1% | 70% ethanol FD powder infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a percent survival of 97.2 ± 8.2% of LU-1 and 97.2 ± 3.1% MCF-7 cell lines following a 72 h treatment period |
100% ethanol FD powder infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in 61.9 ± 4.4% inhibition of NF-κB activity and an HEK-293 percent survival of 105.3 ± 8.3% | 100% ethanol FD powder infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a 15.3 ± 17.1% inhibition of NO and a RAW 264.7 macrophage percent survival of 95.0 ± 10.5% | 100% ethanol FD powder infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a percent survival of 98.5 ± 12.3% of LU-1 and 99.3 ± 7.4% MCF-7 cell lines following a 72 h treatment period | |
Freeze-Dried (FD) Māmaki Leaf H2O Infusions | H2O FD leaf infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in 60.6 ± 3.8% inhibition of NF-κB activity and an HEK-293 percent survival of 88.2 ± 7.0% | H2O FD leaf infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a 4.7 ± 9.7% inhibition of NO and a RAW 264.7 macrophage percent survival of 88.8 ± 17.7% | H2O FD leaf infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a percent survival of 99.8 ± 10.2% of LU-1 and 99.2 ± 9.4% MCF-7 cell lines following a 72 h treatment period |
H2O FD leaf infusion prepared at 60 °C resulted in 39.4 ± 6.4% inhibition of NF-κB activity and an HEK-293 percent survival of 101.2 ± 11.4% | H2O FD leaf infusion prepared at 60 °C resulted in a −1.8 ± 1.1% inhibition of NO and a RAW 264.7 macrophage percent survival of 96.2 ± 13.0% | H2O FD leaf infusion prepared at 60 °C resulted in a percent survival of 97.9 ± 11.3% of LU-1 and 99.4 ± 5.8% MCF-7 cell lines following a 72 h treatment period | |
H2O FD leaf infusion prepared at 100 °C resulted in 59.7 ± 4.8% inhibition of NF-κB activity and an HEK-293 percent survival of 96.0 ± 10.8% | H2O FD leaf infusion prepared at 100 °C resulted in a 17.1 ± 7.8% inhibition of NO and a RAW 264.7 macrophage percent survival of 98.1 ± 9.8% | H2O FD leaf infusion prepared at 100 °C resulted in a percent survival of 99.4 ± 11.0% of LU-1 and 102.9 ± 2.9% MCF-7 cell lines following a 72 h treatment period | |
Freeze-Dried (FD) Māmaki Leaf Ethanol Infusions | 70% ethanol FD leaf infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in 58.3 ± 2.8% inhibition of NF-κB activity and an HEK-293 percent survival of 86.4 ± 12.2% | 70% ethanol FD leaf infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a 36.1 ± 6.3% inhibition of NO and a RAW 264.7 macrophage percent survival of 101.2 ± 6.4% | 70% ethanol FD leaf infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a percent survival of 92.2 ± 18.1% of LU-1 and 99.0 ± 2.1% MCF-7 cell lines following a 72 h treatment period |
100% ethanol FD leaf infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in 38.1 ± 12.1% inhibition of NF-κB activity and an HEK-293 percent survival of 81.2 ± 8.0% | 100% ethanol FD leaf infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a 52.6 ± 6.0% inhibition of NO and a RAW 264.7 macrophage percent survival of 96.8 ± 9.7% | 100% ethanol FD leaf infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a percent survival of 96.8 ± 11.3% of LU-1 and 102.8 ± 2.7% MCF-7 cell lines following a 72 h treatment period | |
Powdered Dehydrated Māmaki H2O Infusions | H2O dehydrated powder infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in 73.7 ± 6.8% inhibition of NF-κB activity and an HEK-293 percent survival of 55.9 ± 9.5% | H2O dehydrated powder infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a 32.1 ± 5.2% inhibition of NO and a RAW 264.7 macrophage percent survival of 101.3 ± 3.6% | H2O dehydrated powder infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a percent survival of 101.5 ± 0.7% of LU-1 and 102.7 ± 5.0% MCF-7 cell lines following a 72 h treatment period |
H2O dehydrated powder infusion prepared at 60 °C resulted in 62.7 ± 7.3% inhibition of NF-κB activity and an HEK-293 percent survival of 53.4 ± 2.6% | H2O dehydrated powder infusion prepared at 60 °C resulted in a 27.6 ± 12.3% inhibition of NO and a RAW 264.7 macrophage percent survival of 100.1 ± 3.5% | H2O dehydrated powder infusion prepared at 60 °C resulted in a percent survival of 102.5 ± 4.1% of LU-1 and 103.8 ± 1.4% MCF-7 cell lines following a 72 h treatment period | |
H2O dehydrated powder infusion prepared at 100 °C resulted in 75.0 ± 8.4% inhibition of NF-κB activity and an HEK-293 percent survival of 43.3 ± 1.5% | H2O dehydrated powder infusion prepared at 100 °C resulted in an 18.4 ± 14.1% inhibition of NO and a RAW 264.7 macrophage percent survival of 102.2 ± 0.9% | H2O dehydrated powder infusion prepared at 100 °C resulted in a percent survival of 102.1 ± 2.8% of LU-1 and 105.8 ± 2.8% MCF-7 cell lines following a 72 h treatment period | |
Powdered Dehydrated Māmaki Ethanol Infusions | 70% ethanol dehydrated powder infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in 28.6 ± 8.4% inhibition of NF-κB activity and an HEK-293 percent survival of 47.4 ± 3.8% | 70% ethanol dehydrated powder infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a 44.5 ± 10.8% inhibition of NO and a RAW 264.7 macrophage percent survival of 102.5 ± 0.3% | 70% ethanol dehydrated powder infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a percent survival of 102.8 ± 1.8% of LU-1 and 102.7 ± 3.5% MCF-7 cell lines following a 72 h treatment period |
100% ethanol dehydrated powder infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in 56.2 ± 1.8% inhibition of NF-κB activity and an HEK-293 percent survival of 45.6 ± 0.0% | 100% ethanol dehydrated powder infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a 35.0 ± 4.1% inhibition of NO and a RAW 264.7 macrophage percent survival of 103.2 ± 0.3% | 100% ethanol dehydrated powder infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a percent survival of 106.5 ± 1.9% of LU-1 and 101.9 ± 4.2% MCF-7 cell lines following a 72 h treatment period | |
Dehydrated Māmaki Leaf H2O Infusions | H2O dehydrated leaf infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in 45.3 ± 1.0% inhibition of NF-κB activity and an HEK-293 percent survival of 49.9 ± 8.2% | H2O dehydrated leaf infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a 30.5 ± 9.7% inhibition of NO and a RAW 264.7 macrophage percent survival of 103.6 ± 0.9% | H2O dehydrated leaf infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a percent survival of 101.5 ± 3.3% of LU-1 and 102.0 ± 3.7% MCF-7 cell lines following a 72 h treatment period |
H2O dehydrated leaf infusion prepared at 60 °C resulted in 3.0 ± 13.1% inhibition of NF-κB activity and an HEK-293 percent survival of 49.4 ± 8.4% | H2O dehydrated leaf infusion prepared at 60 °C resulted in a 22.6 ± 5.2% inhibition of NO and a RAW 264.7 macrophage percent survival of 104.1 ± 1.6% | H2O dehydrated leaf infusion prepared at 60 °C resulted in a percent survival of 104.2 ± 0.5% of LU-1 and 104.2 ± 3.3% MCF-7 cell lines following a 72 h treatment period | |
H2O dehydrated leaf infusion prepared at 100 °C resulted in 53.8 ± 11.1% inhibition of NF-κB activity and an HEK-293 percent survival of 56.5 ± 8.1% | H2O dehydrated leaf infusion prepared at 100 °C resulted in a 44.7 ± 0.0% inhibition of NO and a RAW 264.7 macrophage percent survival of 105.0 ± 0.2% | H2O dehydrated leaf infusion prepared at 100 °C resulted in a percent survival of 103.6 ± 2.6% of LU-1 and 100.5 ± 3.2% MCF-7 cell lines following a 72 h treatment period | |
Dehydrated Māmaki Leaf Ethanol Infusions | 70% ethanol dehydrated leaf infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in 68.4 ± 3.1% inhibition of NF-κB activity and an HEK-293 percent survival of 96.4 ± 11.5% | 70% ethanol dehydrated leaf infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a 50.5 ± 4.5% inhibition of NO and a RAW 264.7 macrophage percent survival of 101.7 ± 3.0% | 70% ethanol dehydrated leaf infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a percent survival of 100.1 ± 1.8% of LU-1 and 95.6 ± 9.1% MCF-7 cell lines following a 72 h treatment period |
100% ethanol dehydrated leaf infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in 37.0 ± 8.5% inhibition of NF-κB activity and an HEK-293 percent survival of 97.1 ± 9.5% | 100% ethanol dehydrated leaf infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a 52.1 ± 2.2% inhibition of NO and a RAW 264.7 macrophage percent survival of 70.5 ± 11.1% | 100% ethanol dehydrated leaf infusion prepared at 27 °C resulted in a percent survival of 85.1 ± 2.5% of LU-1 and 71.3 ± 1.4% MCF-7 cell lines following a 72 h treatment period |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Koher, G.; Khan, A.; Suarez-vega, G.; Meesakul, P.; Bacani, A.-J.; Kohno, T.; Zhu, X.; Kim, K.H.; Cao, S.; Jia, Z. A Comprehensive Insight into Māmaki (Pipturus albidus): Its Ethnomedicinal Heritage, Human Health Research, and Phytochemical Properties. Plants 2023, 12, 2924. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12162924
Koher G, Khan A, Suarez-vega G, Meesakul P, Bacani A-J, Kohno T, Zhu X, Kim KH, Cao S, Jia Z. A Comprehensive Insight into Māmaki (Pipturus albidus): Its Ethnomedicinal Heritage, Human Health Research, and Phytochemical Properties. Plants. 2023; 12(16):2924. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12162924
Chicago/Turabian StyleKoher, Grant, Ajmal Khan, Gabriel Suarez-vega, Pornphimon Meesakul, Ann-Janin Bacani, Tomomi Kohno, Xuewei Zhu, Ki Hyun Kim, Shugeng Cao, and Zhenquan Jia. 2023. "A Comprehensive Insight into Māmaki (Pipturus albidus): Its Ethnomedicinal Heritage, Human Health Research, and Phytochemical Properties" Plants 12, no. 16: 2924. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12162924
APA StyleKoher, G., Khan, A., Suarez-vega, G., Meesakul, P., Bacani, A. -J., Kohno, T., Zhu, X., Kim, K. H., Cao, S., & Jia, Z. (2023). A Comprehensive Insight into Māmaki (Pipturus albidus): Its Ethnomedicinal Heritage, Human Health Research, and Phytochemical Properties. Plants, 12(16), 2924. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12162924