Next Article in Journal
Complete Genome Characterization of Penicillimonavirus gammaplasmoparae, a Bipartite Member of the Family Mymonaviridae
Next Article in Special Issue
Regulation of Flowering Time by Environmental Factors in Plants
Previous Article in Journal
First Report and Complete Genome Characterization of Cherry Virus A and Little Cherry Virus 1 from Russia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Two Arabidopsis Splicing Factors, U2AF65a and U2AF65b, Differentially Control Flowering Time by Modulating the Expression or Alternative Splicing of a Subset of FLC Upstream Regulators
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Beyond NPK: Mineral Nutrient-Mediated Modulation in Orchestrating Flowering Time

1
Department of Molecular Genetics, Dong-A University, Busan 49315, Republic of Korea
2
School of Biological Science and Technology, College of Natural Sciences, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Biological Sciences and Research Center of Ecomimetics, College of Natural Sciences, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(18), 3299; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12183299
Submission received: 21 August 2023 / Revised: 11 September 2023 / Accepted: 12 September 2023 / Published: 18 September 2023

Abstract

:
Flowering time in plants is a complex process regulated by environmental conditions such as photoperiod and temperature, as well as nutrient conditions. While the impact of major nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium on flowering time has been well recognized, the significance of micronutrient imbalances and their deficiencies should not be neglected because they affect the floral transition from the vegetative stage to the reproductive stage. The secondary major nutrients such as calcium, magnesium, and sulfur participate in various aspects of flowering. Micronutrients such as boron, zinc, iron, and copper play crucial roles in enzymatic reactions and hormone biosynthesis, affecting flower development and reproduction as well. The current review comprehensively explores the interplay between microelements and flowering time, and summarizes the underlying mechanism in plants. Consequently, a better understanding of the interplay between microelements and flowering time will provide clues to reveal the roles of microelements in regulating flowering time and to improve crop reproduction in plant industries.

1. Introduction

Flowering time is one of the important agricultural traits alongside germination rate, plant height, yield, drought tolerance, and nutrient use efficiency (NUE). The uniformity and time of flowering, and the transition from vegetative to reproductive stage are influenced by its surrounding environmental conditions such as daylength (photoperiodic flowering pathway), phytohormones such as gibberellic acid (GA) (hormonal flowering pathway), temperature, especially long-period cold temperature (wintertime) (vernalization), plant age, and endogenous signals (autonomous pathway). The molecular mechanisms for each pathway have been characterized for the past two decades [1,2].
Abiotic stress is the adverse impact of non-living factors on plants and their surrounding environment such as drought (dehydration), high and low (or freezing) temperatures, salt, and nutrient deficiency. The type of abiotic stress, duration of the unfavorable condition, and/or recombination of more than one stress condition influence the potential of the plant to perceive input signal(s) and respond to the stress. Environmental stress, especially during the reproductive stage, induces pollen sterility, pollen tube deformation, ovule abortion, and changes in flowering time, which eventually cause decreased yield and crop quality [1,3,4,5,6,7]. Fertilizers and plant nutrient solutions are applied as a common practice to alleviate abiotic stress and enhance crop yield [3,8,9]. Recently, nutrient deficiency (references in [10,11,12]), imbalance of nutrients [13,14,15,16], and heavy metal accumulation in soil [17,18] have been reported to influence flowering time [8], leading to altered plant growth.
The deficiency or imbalance of three major and primary nutrients, nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K), results in altered flowering time in plants [10]. Previously, NPK fertilizers have been used to control flowering time in crop plants [19,20]. A recent study documented the process of how major nutrient elements influence flowering time and the genes involved in NPK nutrient-mediated regulation of flowering time [10]. Largely, loss of function of genes encoding nutrient transporter proteins localized in the plasma membrane or subcellular organelles and signaling genes involved in nutrient assimilation, consequently responsible for nutrient (N, P, and K) deficiency, are reported to induce flowering [10]. The deficiency or excessive accumulation (or supply) of nutrient elements in the soil might directly affect changes in flowering timing. However, the intricate network involving all elements participating in regulating flowering time in plants has not yet been explored.
This study focuses on how secondary nutrients (calcium, magnesium, and sulfur) and micronutrients (boron, zinc, iron, and copper) influence the flowering process in plants. In addition, we summarize the genes and pathways involved in the nutrient element-mediated regulation of the switch to flower or flowering time in various plants.

2. Secondary Nutrients and Flowering Time

2.1. Calcium (Ca)

Calcium is critical for plant growth and development, hormonal response, and environmental stress adaptation [21]. Ca2+ is also a ubiquitous second messenger in living organisms [22]. Cytosolic calcium ion (Ca2+) oscillates in a 24-h rhythmic pattern, and the amplitude and kinetics of calcium fluctuations, the calcium signature, reflect the day-length (photoperiod) and light intensity [23,24]. The circadian clock regulates calcium levels in the cytosolic compartment and integrates oscillator time with environmental signals [23]. The intracellular Ca2+ interacts with (i) calmodulin (CaM) and CaM-like (CML) proteins; (ii) calcineurin-B-like (CBL) proteins; and (iii) Ca2+—dependent protein kinases (CDPKs or CPKs). These proteins perceive transient changes in calcium levels upon various environmental stresses. Further, they transduce and regulate stress response by interacting with a broad range of target proteins, including membrane transporters (channels, pumps, and ion antiporters), transcription factors, protein kinases, protein phosphatases, and metabolic enzymes [25,26,27,28,29].
The research on how calcium influences flowering began in the late 1980s by applying calcium ions (CaCl2) and calcium ionophores, calcium blockers (La3+, LaCl3), calmodulin inhibitors (chlorpromazine and W7), and calcium chelator (EGTA) in Pharbitis nil, which is a short-day (SD, shorter daylength than nightlength) flowering plant and exhibits photoperiodic floral induction at the early seedling stage [30,31]. Since calcium ions and CaM proteins were considered involved in flower induction in P. nil [32], functions of CML proteins in other plants related to flowering time have also been characterized. The Arabidopsis deficient mutants of CML24 or both CML23 and CML24 are insensitive to ABA and tolerant to CoCl2, molybdic acid (Na2MoO4), and ZnSO4. Interestingly, the mutants exhibit delayed flowering in long-day (LD, longer daylength than nightlength) conditions with higher expression of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC), a floral repressor in LD [33,34]. Recently, CML24, known to regulate circadian oscillation of cytosolic Ca2+, was characterized to decipher the information about photoperiod, timing, and light intensity [35]. However, whether CML24 directly regulates photoperiodic flowering or flowering time indirectly by regulating the circadian oscillator(s), which senses the changes in light periods and influences flowering, needs further clarification.
In P. nil, CML was shown to be a critical flowering regulator. However, PnCDPK1 potentially controls the transition of a vegetative shoot apex to a flower bud, as kinases can transduce calcium signals via reversible phosphorylation of target proteins [36,37]. CDPKs and calcium/calmodulin-binding kinases are involved in flowering time in other plants (Arabidopsis, soybean, and tobacco). The knockout mutant of AtCPK32 exhibits late flowering by increasing the FLC expression. CPK32 was found to interact with and phosphorylate FLOWERING CONTROL LOCUS A (FCA) in a Ca2+-dependent manner, which induces distal polyadenylation of FCA and reduces the FLC expression [38]. A mutation in CDPK38 (or CPK38) developed using CRISPR techniques showed late flowering with lower expression of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and flowering-related genes in soybean [39]. Tobacco Ca2+/calmodulin-binding protein kinase 1 (CBK1) is a negative regulator of flowering. CBK1 binds to calmodulin in a Ca2+-dependent manner and phosphorylates itself and its substrates. Transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing NtCBK1 display a late-flowering phenotype, but not through influencing either the expression of neurofilament light chain (NFL), a tobacco homolog of LEAFY (LFY) affecting floral structure, or by blocking demethylation, a treatment that causes early flowering in tobacco [40]. AtCBK3, also known as AtCRK1 (CDPK-related protein kinase 1), binds to calmodulin (CaM) in a Ca2+-dependent manner, while autophosphorylation and substrate phosphorylation activities are independent of Ca2+ [41]. In addition, it interacts with CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) and LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY), two-morning circadian oscillator proteins [42,43]. The CKB3-overexpressing transgenic plants display shorter periods of CCA1 and LHY and exhibit early flowering compared to wild-type in both LD and SD conditions [43].
Altogether, CaM, CPK, and Ca2+ transporters appear to regulate flowering, including a Ca2+-regulated Na+/Ca2+ exchanger AtNCL [44], a vacuolar H+/Ca2+ transporter and calcium exchanger1 (CAX1) [45], and a chloroplast-localizing calcium ion transporter ALBINO3/PPF1 [46,47]. AtNCL is a tonoplast-localized Ca2+ transporter with EF-hand domains and regulates Na+ and Ca2+ homeostasis. The atncl mutants are Ca2+ tolerant but sensitive to Na+ stress and show early flowering in LD due to high expression of CONSTANS (CO) and FT [44]. Another tonoplast Ca2+ transporter, CAX1, regulates flowering time. The cax1-1 mutant delays flowering and is tolerant to Mg2+ and Mn2+ stresses but can survive Ca2+ deficiency stress [45]. Interestingly, AtNCL and CAX1 are both implicated in auxin signaling. Endogenous auxin accumulation is higher in atncl than in wild-type, while the auxin level is reduced in cax1-1 [44,45]. AtNCL transcript is downregulated following the exogenous auxin treatment, whereas the root growth of cax1-1 is insensitive to auxin treatment. However, how the intercellular Ca2+ homeostasis, controlled by vacuolar-localizing Ca2+ transporters and simultaneous auxin signaling, regulates flowering time is unclear. Another calcium transporter, PPF1/ALBINO3, which regulates flowering time, is localized at chloroplast sub-organelles [47]. Overexpression of PPF1 causes higher Ca2+ accumulation in the chloroplasts, while PPF1 antisense transgenic plants contain a low level of calcium ion. PPF1/ALBINO3 delays flowering by upregulating the expression of floral repressor TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1), without altering the FLC expression [46]. Antisense transgenic plants of ALBINO3, ALBINO3(-) display early flowering due to high expression of LFY, whose transcription is negatively regulated by TFL1 [46,48]. Experimental evidence suggests that calcium transporters and calcium-dependent kinases are involved in the flowering transition; however, the detailed molecular mechanism remains to be clarified. Moreover, it would be interesting to determine how the changes in subcellular Ca2+ storage capacity and cytosolic Ca2+ oscillation is related to flowering. Also, further investigation is required to identify the molecules that sense the changes and integrate and transfer the signals to flowering pathways.

2.2. Magnesium (Mg)

Magnesium participates in the growth and reproduction of plants [49], as Mg is critical for the conformational stabilization of macromolecules such as nucleic acids, proteins, and chlorophylls. It controls the activities of several enzymes such as kinases, H+-ATPases, and DNA and RNA polymerases. Thus, Mg deficiency in plants results in a reduced photosynthetic rate, chlorophyll degradation, ROS generation and oxidative damage [50], and the disruption of sucrose loading to the phloem [51,52]. Regarding flowering, several Mg2+ transporters (MGT) in Arabidopsis are known to be essential for pollen development. Disruption of specific Mg2+ transporters, mitochondria-localizing AtMGT5, plasma membrane-localizing AtMGT9, and ER-localizing AtMGT1 and AtMGT10 leads to pollen abortion and defective male gametophyte development and male fertility [53,54,55,56]. In addition, Mg2+-dependent exonucleases encoded by the nuclear genes, DEFECTIVE IN POLLEN ORGANELLE DNA DEGRADATION1 (DPD1; localized in plastids and mitochondria) and AtMGT20 (localized in mitochondria in developing pollen), degrade the paternal organelle DNA [50,57]. DPD1 homologs are present in angiosperm but not in moss, algae, or animals [58]. A previous study revealed that Mg2+ localizes in the shoot apex during flowering induction in P. nil, an SD flowering plant model [59], which is clear evidence of the involvement of Mg in flower development. During the vegetative stage or continuous light conditions, Mg2+ accumulates in the top layers of shoot apical meristem (SAM). However, an SD treatment reduces the Mg2+ content in the top layers and triggers floral induction. Mg is considered an important environmental factor in maintaining plant circadian rhythms because Mg deficiency causes longer periods of circadian oscillators, CCA1 [60,61]. Thus, an altered circadian rhythm induced by Mg malnutrition in the soil might affect the photoperiodic flowering pathway in plants.

2.3. Sulfur (S)

Sulfur is a critical macronutrient for plants. As it is present in amino acids such as cysteine and methionine, it plays important roles in the activities of proteins and co-enzymes, prosthetic groups, and vitamins and antioxidants [62,63]. FIERY1 (FRY1), an inositol polyphosphate 1-phosphatase, involves sulfur metabolism by dephosphorylating 3′-phosphoadenosine 5′-phosphosulfate (PAPS) and converting it into adenosyl phosphosulfate (APS) [64,65]. Interestingly, it has a 3′(2′), 5′-bisphosphate nucleotidase activity, dephosphorylating 3’-phosphoadenosine 5’-phosphate (PAP) to produce adenosine monophosphate (AMP) and inorganic phosphate [64,65]. The loss-of-function mutants of FRY1 possess pleiotropic phenotypes. FRY1 is involved in various biological processes such as sulfate assimilation [66], abscisic acid and stress signaling [67], cold and drought tolerance and signaling [68,69], RNA silencing and miRNA accumulation [70,71], fatty acid oxygenation regulation [72], oxidative stress response [73,74] leaf morphology [75], lateral root formation [76], circadian rhythm [77], and light-regulated responses, including hypocotyl and petiole growth, and flowering [78]. The fry1 mutant exhibits late flowering due to the reduced FT transcript [78]. The major stress-related responses and physiological phenotypes of the fry1 mutant could be due to the high accumulation of PAP, which goes to the nucleus from chloroplast as a retrograde signal during abiotic stress [68]. However, the molecular explanation for delayed flowering in fry1 mutants remains to be investigated.
Glutathione (GSH), a cysteine-containing tripeptide (γ-glutamyl-cysteinyl-glycine), participates in homeostasis and cellular defense, including redox status, redox signal transduction, and detoxification of ROS and toxic compounds [79,80]. GSH biosynthesis from three constituent amino acids, L-glutamate, L-cysteine, and glycine, needs two ATP-dependent enzymes, γ-glutamyl-cysteine synthetase (γ-ECS or GSH1) and GSH synthetase (GS or GSH2). The plastid-localizing GSH1 catalyzes the first rate-limiting step to produce γ-glutamyl-cysteine (γ-EC). Plastid and cytosolic GSH2 sequentially adds glycine to γ-EC, generating GSH [81]. GSH increases plant tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses [82,83,84] and delays senescence and flowering [85]. GSH1 overexpressing transgenic plants show delayed flowering due to a high FLC transcript level and a low FT level. In contrast, pad2-1 (phytoalexin deficient 2-1), a mutant allele of GSH1, shows an earlier flowering phenotype [85]. However, further studies are required to understand the molecular connection between the antioxidant enzyme and flowering time.

3. Micronutrients and Flowering Time

3.1. Boron (B)

Boron (B) is an essential micronutrient for plant growth and development as it is involved in cell wall assembly, maintenance of plasma membrane functions, developmental processes in root and shoot meristems, stimulation of reproductive tissues, improvement of seed quality, and biosynthesis of a few metabolic compounds such as antioxidants and polyphenols [86,87,88]. It also participates in carbohydrate metabolism and translocation, pollen germination and pollen tube developmental process, cell division, and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) oxidase activity (increasing IAA amount) [86,87,88]. Thus, boron deficiency causes inhibition of root elongation and pollen tube growth, retarded growth with reduced leaf expansion, and fertility loss [89]. In contrast, boron is toxic to plants at high concentrations by interrupting cell division and limiting root growth [90] because the optimum boron concentration required for plant growth and development is narrow [91,92]. Boric acid and borate anions form complexes with cis-hydroxyl groups (-OH). One of the main functions of boron is to cross-link the pectic polysaccharide rhamnogalacturonan-II (RG-II) in the cell wall [93]. In the context of maintaining the cell wall structure and cell division, initial studies focused on the role of boron in pollen development and germination [87,88]. Boric acid channels exhibit distinct cell expressions such as plasma membrane localizing nodulin 26-like intrinsic proteins (NIPs), and borate transporters (BORs). Among them, AtNIP7;1 [94], AtNIP4;1, and AtNIP4;2 [95] are expressed in anther tapetum cells, pollen, and the pollen tube, respectively, participating in pollen germination and elongation. BOR1, predominantly expressed in anthers, is involved in pollen germination and elongation in rice [96].
Boron homeostasis appears to be involved in flower development because the sensitivity to boron deficiency is higher at the reproductive stage than the vegetative stage. A few boron transporters are expressed in shoot meristems and regulate floral development [89,97]. BRAHMA/BRM protein, degraded via 26S proteasome-mediated degradation upon high-boron stress, is involved in flowering and boron-tolerance by alleviating boron-induced DNA damage [98,99,100]. AtBRM, a chromatin-remodeling ATPase, is a constitutive subunit of an ATP-dependent SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex. It binds to acetylated lysine residue of histone tails through its bromodomains [100]. AtBRM-silenced and null mutants exhibit various defect phenotypes, including dwarf and small plants [99,100], altered leaf and root development with curled leaves [99,101], defects in floral organ patterning [99,102], hypersensitivity to ABA and drought tolerance [103], hypersensitivity to P deficiency [104], and boron tolerance [98]. In addition, the loss-of-function mutants of BRM show early flowering both in LD and SD due to high expression of floral activators, CO, FT, and SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO 1 (SOC1) [99,100], and reduced expression of a floral repressor, SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE (SVP) [105]. Interestingly, the late flowering of the brm mutant was due to the high expression of FLC, which is also a floral repressor [106]. BRM controls the FLC expression through the methylation status of histones on the FLC locus with reduced H3K4me3 and increased H3K27me3 levels, though it is not dependent on the vernalization pathway [106]. A genome-wide analysis using chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by next-generation sequencing (ChIP-seq) showed that the H3K27me3 level is significantly increased at the SVP locus in brm mutants compared to wild-type [105]. In addition, the SVP transcript is decreased in the brm mutant, suggesting that BRM promotes the expression of SVP, a floral repressor [105]. Moreover, the chromatin remodeler BRM physically interacts with a histone demethylase, RELATIVE OF EARLY FLOWERING 6 (REF6, an H3K27me3 demethylase) to facilitate transcriptional activation of target genes through the removal of the repressive histone mark H3K27me3. One of its target genes is TARGET OF FLC AND SVP1 (TFS1), a transcription factor expressing on the flanks of SAM and promoting floral transition or induction both in LD and SD. BRM and REF6 complex is recruited to the TFS1 loci in a SOC1-dependent manner to increase chromatin accessibility and promote TFS1 transcription [107]. Recently, it has been reported that BRM protein interacts with a transcription factor GNC (GATA, NITRATE-INDUCIBLE, CARBON METABOLISM INVOLVED), and this complex directly binds to the SOC1 genomic locus to suppress SOC1 expression [108]. In addition, BRM appears to be involved in gibberellic acid (GA) signaling-mediated flowering by forming a complex with DELLA proteins (GA-negative regulators) and another transcription factor, NUCLEAR FACTOR Y-C (NF-YC). In normal conditions (without GA), DELLA protein promotes the interaction of BRM with NF-YC; thus, NF-YC is not able to bind to SOC1, resulting in late flowering. Meanwhile, DELLA-RBM binds to the SOC1 gene locus, repressing the expression of SOC1 through decreasing the H3K4me3 level at the SOC1 chromatin. These processes subsequently prevent floral transition. However, GA induces the 26S proteasome ubiquitination-mediated degradation of DELLA proteins. Consequently, NF-YCs, transcriptional activators of FT and SOC1, become free from BRM protein, promoting flowering [109]. In addition, high boron increases histone acetylation in chromatin, inducing relaxed chromatin and consequent high susceptibility to double-strand DNA break. Meanwhile high boron degrades BRM protein, a chromatin-remodeling ATPase, reducing chromatin opening, which provide less chance for DNA damage [98]. These studies indicate that boron homeostasis and flowering (upon boron stress) implicate genetic regulations of autonomous and epigenetic regulation and hormonal response.

3.2. Zinc (Zn)

Zinc is an essential micronutrient in enzyme-mediated catabolic reactions, plant growth, and development. Zinc deficiency causes a significant reduction in carbohydrate and protein levels, which in turns restricts chlorophyll biosynthesis and leads to chlorosis in newly formed leaves. Suppression of stem elongation due to zinc deficiency reduces flowering and yield because of poor bud development [110]. High Zn concentration (not very high at the stress level) induces early flowering in Arabidopsis arenosa [111]. Supply of exogenous zinc to Rhynchostylis retusa L. promotes flowering induction, consistent with the previous study that high zinc concentration (750 ppm) induced early flowering [112]. A horticulture crop, gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.), also exhibited early flowering after exogenous Zn and Fe application [113]. In addition to flowering time, applying Zn and Fe increases flower longevity, showing the synergistic effect of simultaneous application of Zn and Fe [113]. Applying micronutrient fertilizer containing Zn, B, Fe, and Mn shortens the days to first flower emergence in gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii L.) [114]. Application of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) caused the promotion of plant growth, early germination and flowering, and a significant increase in fruit yield and seed weight in wheat, barley, and onion, indicating the positive impacts of Zn on overall plant growth and yield [115,116,117].
The zinc ion binds to amino acid residues and forms zinc finger (ZnF) motifs, which allow proper functionality and structural stability. Zinc finger proteins (ZFPs) with zinc finger motifs are classified into C2H2, C2HC, C2HC5, CCCH, C3HC4, and others according to the order and number of Zn-binding amino acid residues [118]. ZFPs play important roles in growth and development, abiotic stress response, and immunity against pathogens [119,120,121,122]. Various ZnF transcription factors belonging to distinct clades are involved in flowering regulation by modulating the transcription of floral regulators such as FT, CO, and FLC. Arabidopsis FILAMENTOUS FLOWER (FIL)/YABBY1 (YAB1) containing N-terminal CH2C6 ZnF domain and C-terminal YABBY domain participates in the formation of inflorescence and floral meristems by coordinating with AP1 and LFY [123,124]. Arabidopsis RING-domain or C3H2C3-type zinc finger protein, RED and FAR-RED INSENSITIVE 2 (RFI2), was reported to suppress the expression of CO and FT in the phytochrome B (phyB) signaling-mediated photoperiodic flowering pathway. The rfi2-1 mutant showed increased CO and FT expression and early flowering under both LD and SD [125]. PhyB-interacting Zn transcription factors, VASCULAR PLANT ONE-ZINC FINGERs (AtVOZ1 and AtVOZ2), are positive regulators of a vernalization-induced flowering pathway, as the late-flowering phenotype due to elevated FLC transcript level in voz1_voz2 double mutant is suppressed by vernalization [126,127,128].
Overexpression of Arabidopsis CCCH-type ZnF protein AtZFP1 leads to late flowering with decreased FT and SOC1 and increased FLC and CO expression. Contrastingly, mutant plants show early flowering with increased FT and SOC1 and decreased FLC and CO, indicating that AtZFP1 suppresses flowering by promoting FLC expression [129]. Additionally, AtZFP1 is involved in resistance to salt stress by elevating unsaturated fatty acid content [129]. The overexpression of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) CCCH-type ZnF, MsZFN in Arabidopsis exhibits delayed flowering with increased FLC levels and decreased FT, SOC1, and GI expression in LD [130]. However, Arabidopsis overexpressing another CCCH-type ZnF ZFP3 from Adonis amurensis can flower at very cold temperatures. It also shows early flowering under normal and low temperatures due to higher expression of FT and lower FLC [131]. A double mutant khz1khz2 in CCCH-ZnF and K-homolog domain KHZ1 and KHZ2 proteins exhibit late flowering with high expression of FLC [132]. In rice (Oryza sativa), an SD flowering plant, Early heading date 4 (Ehd4) encoding CCCH-type ZnF protein promotes the expression of Heading date 3a (Hd3a), a rice counterpart of Arabidopsis FT and RICE FLOWERING LOCUS T (RFT1, a homolog of Hd3a) in the Ehd1-dependent manner, which is a rice-specific floral inducer in SD [133,134].
Arabidopsis C2H2-type ZnF factor, LATE FLOWERING (LATE), participates in the photoperiod pathway of FT. The overexpression of LATE delays flowering with impaired inflorescence growth and sterile and incomplete flower formation [135]. LATE can interfere with the activity of FT upstream regulatory factors to block photoperiodic flowering since LATE expression in leaf vasculature suppresses FT expression in LD. However, whether LATE regulates FT by directly binding to the FT promoter locus or through other FT repressor complexes is unknown. The plant-specific C2H2-type ZnF-SET domain protein, AtCZS, functions as a repressor of FLC through chromatin remodeling in Arabidopsis. The CZS mutation causes hyperacetylation of histone H4 and reduces demethylation of histone H3 in the FLC locus, consequently leading to increased FLC and delayed flowering [136]. However, another C2H2 ZnF protein with a proline-rich domain, SUPPRESSOR OF FRIGIDA 4 (SUF4), activates FLC transcription by binding to the FLC promoter region after forming a complex with FRIGIDA (FRI) and FRI-LIKE 1 (FRL1) [137,138]. suf4 mutants strongly suppress the late flowering of FRI mutants with reduced H3K4 trimethylation at FLC [137,139]. SUF4 may recruit histone H3 methyltransferase EFS (EARLY FLOWERING IN SHORT DAYS), a flowering inhibitor, and the PAF1-like complex to the FLC locus [140]. Another rice FCS-like divergent C2H2 ZnF group protein, FCS-LIKE ZINC FINGER 2 (OsFLZ2), destabilizes an SD floral activator, OsMADS51, to repress its transcriptional activity, resulting in lower expression of Early heading date 1 (Ehd1) [141].
Maize ZnF INDETERMINATE 1 (ZmID1) was suggested to act as a transcriptional regulator of the floral transition in a non-cell-autonomous manner due to late flowering in the id1 mutant [142,143]. Rice EARLY HEADING DATE 2 (Ehd2), an ortholog of maize ZmID1, was later called Rice Indeterminate 1 (RID1), a C2H2-type ZnF transcription factor. It promotes flowering by positively regulating Ehd1 in SD conditions, showing the mutation in Ehd2 causes extremely late flowering with decreased transcription levels of Ehd1, Hd3a (an ortholog of FT), and RFT1 [144]. SUPPRESSOR OF RID1 (SID1)/Oryza sativa INDETERMINATE DOMAIN 4 (OsIDD4) is identified as a suppressor of the never-flowering phenotype of rid1 [145]. SID1, an IDD family member, induces Hd3a and RFT1 expression by directly binding to the Hd3a and RFT1 promoter region [145]. The conserved IDDs of OsIDD4, OsIDD1, and OsIDD6 also rescue the never-flowering phenotype of rid1, indicating that OsIDD1 and OsIDD6 redundantly function in the regulation of flowering time with SID1/OsIDD4 [145].
A few ZnF proteins with histone demethylase activity can participate in histone modification of FLC due to the presence of the JmjC-domain. EARLY FLOWERING 6 (ELF6)/JmjC DOMAIN-CONTAINING PROTEIN 11 (JMJ11) and RELATIVE OF EARLY FLOWERING 6 (REF6)/JMJ12 are plant-specific C2H2-type ZnF-containing Jumonji C-terminal (JmjC) proteins. These proteins modulate the demethylase activity of H3K27me3. The ref6 mutant is late flowering because of high FLC expression, while the elf6 mutant is early flowering due to the downregulated FLC and sequential upregulation of FT [146]. ELF6/JMJ11 binds to the FLC locus to activate its expression [147]. Also, REF6/JMJ12 associates with SOC1 locus to promote SOC1 expression in LD [148]. Another H3K27me3 demethylase, JMJ13, contains a C4HCHC-type ZnF domain and is a repressor of flowering time in response to photoperiod and high temperature. The jmj13 mutant is early flowering under the LD at normal (22 °C) and high (28 °C) temperatures, and under the SD at high temperatures but not at normal temperatures due to reduced expression of floral repressor gene SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE (SVP) [149]. Rice Se14 containing JmjC domain and C2H2-type zinc finger motifs exhibits upregulated RFT1, a florigen-like gene, and increases trimethylated H3K4 in the RFT1 promoter region, resulting in early flowering [150]. JMJ14, another H3K4 demethylase with a C5HC2-type ZnF domain from Arabidopsis, represses floral transition but does not regulate FLC expression. Nevertheless, it inhibits the expression of several floral integrators such as FT, SOC1, AP1, and LFY [151,152,153]. Additionally, JMJ14 forms a complex with EMBRYONIC FLOWER 1 (EMF1, a component of polycomb group (PcG) complex) and LIKE HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN1 (LHP1). This complex binds to the FT locus and represses the expression of FT from dawn until dusk and at night, whereas the occupation of this complex on FT promoter is alleviated to promote FT transcription at dusk [154]. However, two H3K4 demethylases with a C5HC2-type ZnF domain, JMJ15 and JMJ18, reduce H3K4me3 at the FLC locus, thus inducing flowering with repressed FLC and increased FT transcript levels [155,156,157].
CO/B-Box domain protein 1 (BBX1), a well-characterized ZnF protein in flowering regulation, possesses a B-box characterized with a zinc finger binding domain with conserved cysteine and histidine residues. BBX1 is a positive flowering regulator promoting FT expression [158]. Including the CO gene, Arabidopsis CO-LIKE 9 (COL9)/BBX7, COL5/BBX6, and EMF1-INTERACTING PROTEIN 6 (EIP6)/BBX32 are involved in the regulation of flowering time [159,160,161]. The COL3/BBX4 and BBX32 complex activates FT transcription by binding to the FT promoter region, initiating floral transition [162]. A rice ortholog of Arabidopsis CO, HEADING DATE 1 (Hd1) with two B-boxes is also well known as a central integrator of the SD-photoperiod-induced flowering pathway in rice. On the other hand, OsCOL3 with a single B-box suppresses flowering, exhibiting decreased FT-LIKE (FTL) expression and late flowering in OsCOL3-overexpressing plants under SD conditions [163,164]. The suppression of CmBBX24, a Chrysanthemum morifolium ZnF transcription factor, leads to early flowering and increased photoperiod- and GA biosynthesis-associated gene expression. In contrast, the CmBBX24 overexpression causes late flowering and decreased photoperiod- and GA biosynthesis-associated gene expression, suggesting that CmBBX24 might regulate flowering via both photoperiod and gibberellin biosynthesis pathways [165].
ZFPs are present in approximately 0.8% of the Arabidopsis genome [166]. They contribute to overall plant development, including flowering induction and floral morphogenesis through transcriptional and chromatin regulation. However, the exact role of zinc in ZFP activation and action has not been elucidated completely. Thus, further work on flowering induction and ZFP modification according to Zn status will help interpret the critical roles of zinc in the functional activation of ZFPs and the regulation of plant development.

3.3. Iron (Fe)

As mentioned in Section 3.2, several JmjC domain proteins with demethylase activities modulate flowering time by regulating FLC expression through histone remodeling. These JmjC domain histone demethylases require Fe2+ and α-ketoglutarate as cofactors [167]. JMJ30 directly binds to the FLC locus, enhances FLC transcription by demethylating histone H3K27me or reducing the level of H3K27me3, an epigenetic FLC-silencing marker, and suppresses flowering. The double mutant of JMJ30 and its homologous JMJ32, jmj30_jmj32, shows early flowering under vernalized conditions with a high accumulation level of H3K27me3 and a reduced level of FLC transcription [168,169]. JMJ27 also shows delayed flowering by demethylating H3K9 in the promoter regions of major flowering regulators such as FLC, CO, FT, and SOC1 [155,170,171,172].
In addition to being a cofactor of histone methylase enzymes, iron (Fe) is an essential micronutrient because it is required for redox reaction, electron transport chain, chlorophyll biosynthesis and photosynthesis, and nitrate and sulfate reduction [173]. Fe, one of the most abundant elements in soil, is absorbed in the form of ferrous (Fe2+, reduced state) by plants. Fe uptake, translocation, distribution, compartmentalization, and storage are important processes for Fe homeostasis [174]. Several genes in Fe homeostasis (Fe transport and storage) are circadian regulated [175], and Fe deficiency lengthens the periods of circadian oscillations. Fe-dependent circadian rhythms are lost in GIGANTEA (GI) mutants, a circadian clock gene regulating photoperiodic flowering, or ZEITLUPE (ZTL). ZTL is a component of the circadian clock and an interactor of GI protein [175,176]. Moreover, the longer period upon Fe deficiency is impaired in Fe uptake mutants of IRON-REGULATED TRANSPORTER 1 (IRT1) and FER-LIKE IRON DEFICIENCY INDUCED TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR (FIT) [175,176,177], suggesting that Fe nutrient homeostasis works as a feedback signal for plant circadian rhythms and vice versa.
Plants have developed regulatory systems to maintain Fe uptake and homeostasis. Strategy I in dicot and non-graminaceous monocots adapts a reduction approach, secreting acidic solution via H+-ATPase2 (AHA2) and reducing Ferric (Fe3+) to Fe2+ by FERRIC REDUCTION OXIDASE 2 (FRO2), which is a Fe3+ chelate reductase. The reduced and soluble Fe2+ is transported via IRT1 at the plasma membrane of root epidermal cells [174]. Strategy II in grass monocot utilizes siderophores secreted to the rhizosphere to chelate Fe3+. The chelated Fe complex is transported via YELLOW STRIPE1 (YS1) transporters [174]. Iron deficiency induces significant changes in the expression of genes involved in Fe uptake. The basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) proteins work as key regulators in the Fe deficiency-induced transcriptional regulatory network [178,179]. In Arabidopsis, which exploits strategy I for Fe uptake, at least 17 bHLH transcription factors from 6 subfamilies are involved in Fe homeostasis [174]. FIT/bHLH29, specifically localized in roots, is induced under Fe deficiency. The expression of many Fe-regulated genes, including FRO2, is dependent on FIT/bHLH29.
Arabidopsis bHLH38, bHLH100, and bHLH101 regulate Fe homeostasis by transcriptional activation of Fe uptake-associated genes, IRT1 and FRO2 [180]. The bhlh38 bhlh100 bhlh101 triple mutant shows severe chlorosis, reduced Fe contents, early flowering, and increased FT expression [181,182]. Previous reports suggest that Fe deficiency suppresses flowering via bHLH38-bHLH100-bHLH101-dependent mechanisms [181,182]. In addition, FIT/bHLH29 and its interactors bHLH38 and bHLH39 physically interact with GA-negative regulator DELLA proteins [183]. FIT/bHLH29 and DELLA heterodimer complex do not inhibit the heterodimer formation of FIT and Ib bHLH proteins (a subgroup including bLHL38, 39, 100, and 101); however, FIT transcription is inhibited by preventing the binding of the heterodimer (FIT and Ib bHLH) to the FIT promoter locus [183]. Furthermore, in response to Fe deficiency, DELLA proteins accumulate in the root meristem to inhibit root growth but are degraded in the epidermal cells of the root differentiation zone. Further, the FIT protein released from the DELLA-FIT complex activates Fe uptake, while DELLA proteins are distributed in all root tissues in normal conditions, suggesting that GA signaling is involved in Fe deficiency response through the interaction of DELLA and FIT [183]. GA signaling through DELLA proteins regulates flowering time, as DELLAs repress the expression of LFY and SOC1 (floral meristem identity genes), especially in SD [184]. As a superfamily containing at least 162 members in Arabidopsis, bHLH proteins participate in mineral nutrient and abiotic stress responses as well as in developmental processes such as flowering and hormone signaling [179]. Further studies on Fe’s roles in the functional activation of bHLH proteins will enrich our understanding of Fe homeostasis and plant flowering, which would help improve plant productivity.
Iron is an important enzyme catalyst, especially in electron transport chains. Iron-sulfur (Fe-S) is a type of catalytic iron center (or cofactor) hemes. A central member of the cytosolic Fe-S cluster, MMS19/MET18, is reported to increase the efficiency of Fe-S cluster assembly on DNA polymerase. The Fe-S cluster of MET18 is required for DNA glycosylase ROS1-mediated DNA methylation [185,186]. Interestingly, the mms19 mutant shows early flowering due to the upregulation of FT, AP1, and AP2 and the downregulation of FLC [185]. The met18 mutant shows DNA hypermethylation at hundreds of genetic loci and subsequently induces transcriptional silencing of those genes. However, the methylation in transposable element (TE) regions is reduced in the met18 mutant [187]. Thus, DNA methylation status changed by MMS19/MET18 and its interacting proteins seems to influence the expression of genes associated with flowering, though clear molecular analysis remains to be elucidated.

3.4. Copper (Cu)

Copper is an essential redox-active transition metal, which changes its oxidation status between cuprous (Cu(I), Cu+, reduced form) and cupric (Cu(II), Cu2+, oxidized form) and acts as a structural element in regulatory proteins [188,189]. While Cu deficiency can negatively affect developmental processes such as photosynthesis, respiration, and reproductive success, copper excess causes phytotoxicity because free Cu ions can produce toxic hydroxyl radicals, which can damage macromolecules and bind to a thiol (or sulfhydryl) group [190,191]. Cu homeostasis is tightly regulated by Cu transporters and metallo-chaperones [188,189].
Copper participates in photosynthetic electron transport, mitochondrial respiration, oxidative stress responses, lignification of cell walls, and ethylene hormone signaling [188], as it serves as a cofactor of plastocyanin, an electron carrier (between the cytochrome-b6f complex and photosystem I located in the thylakoid membrane) in the thylakoid lumen [192,193,194], cytochrome c oxidase in the mitochondrial inner membrane [195], copper/zinc superoxide dismutase (Cu/ZnSOD) in stroma and cytosol [196], laccase and amine oxidase in the apoplast [197,198], polyphenol oxidase in the thylakoid lumen [199,200], and phytocyanin (or plantacyanin) in the apoplast [201,202]. In addition, Cu is involved in developing male and female reproductive organs, affecting grain, seed, and fruit formation [203]. Phytocyanins, another group of Cu proteins, are secreted to extracellular matrices of pollen and pistil and are involved in pollen tube guidance [201,204]. In addition, the distribution or reallocation of Cu seems to regulate the development of reproductive organs. Among six Cu transporters (CTR) in Arabidopsis, Copper Transporter Protein 1 (COPT1) [205] and COPT6 [206,207] are mostly expressed in the root tips and pollen and at the vasculature of green tissues and reproductive organs, respectively, to facilitate Cu redistribution under its scarcity.
SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE7 (SPL7) is a key regulator of Cu homeostasis [208,209]. Cu+ binds to the highly conserved cysteine and histidine residues in SPL7 [209,210], though Cu does not change the expression of SPL7 at the transcriptional level. During Cu deficiency, it binds to GTAC promoter sequences in copper response elements (CuREs) of target genes and activates the transcription of several genes involved in copper homeostasis [208,209], indicating the possibility of post-translational modification in the SPL7 protein in response to Cu availability. SPL7 directly regulates Cu transporters and chaperons such as COPT1, COPT2, COPT6, and Yellow Stripe-Like2 (YSL2, a transporter of nicotianamine-metal complexes) [202,209]. Additionally, it activates specific microRNA transcription, including miRNA397, miRNA398, miRNA409, and miRNA857 [209,211,212,213]. The Cu-miRNAs inhibit the expression of Cu proteins such as phytocyanin, laccase, and Cu/ZnSOD, thereby regulating Cu allocation and homeostasis [214,215]. The spl7-1 mutant exhibits lightly delayed flowering both in Cu-deficient medium and normal conditions, probably due to high miRNA156 accumulation, whose overexpression in Arabidopsis and other plants delays flowering and prolongs the juvenile phase [216]. miRNA156 expresses highly in the juvenile phase, and its expression reduces before the transition to flowering and controls the vegetative-to-reproductive transition [217,218]. Limited Cu conditions delay flowering time with reduced expression of the floral activator FT [219]. However, further study is required to understand how Cu deficiency also induces miRNA172 accumulation, which promotes flowering through the posttranscriptional regulation of floral organ identity gene APETALA2 (AP2), AP2-like transcriptional factors, including TARGET OF EAT1 (TOE1), TOE2, TOE3, SCHLAFMUTZE (SMZ), and SCHNARCHZAPFEN (SNZ), and floral repressors and functions upstream of FT in a CO-independent manner [219,220,221,222,223].
The excess of copper during heavy metal treatment (concentrations above 50 μM and 100 μM), such as copper sulfate (CuSO4), induces ethylene production [224]. Ethylene causes delayed flowering via an enhanced accumulation of DELLA proteins, which represses floral meristem identity genes LFY and SOC1 [225] and induces ethylene signaling-associated chromatin remodeling to promote the expression of FLC, a floral repressor [226]. Moreover, ethylene activates downstream signaling through ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR 1 (ERF1), which binds to the FT promoter and delays flowering time by reducing FT expression [227]. It appears that the ethylene-response pathway is regulated by copper homeostasis. Arabidopsis heavy metal transporting ATPase 7 (HMA7)/RESPONSIVE TO ANTAGONIST 1 (RAN1), a P-type ATPase Cu transporter that is localized in the endomembrane reticulum (ER) of root and flower tissues, is required to deliver Cu to the ER-localizing ethylene receptors including Ethylene Response 1 (ETR1). The Cu binding to ETR1 is also needed for ethylene binding and functional receptors [228,229,230,231,232,233]. Two weak alleles of ran1 mutants (ran1-1 and ran1-2) only show ethylene phenotypes upon the treatment of trans-cyclooctene, an ethylene-response antagonist, but not to ethylene, and the phenotype is suppressed by adding Cu ions [228]. Two strong mutant alleles of RNA1 (ran1-3 and ran1-4) [229,234] exhibit ethylene responses, including short root and hypocotyl, radial expansion of the hypocotyl, and exaggerated curvature of the apical hook. These phenotypes correspond to the loss-of-function phenotypes of ethylene receptor mutants. Thus, Cu-limited conditions and excess amount up to the toxic level can both alter flowering time or affect reproduction, suggesting that Cu homeostasis influences flowering.

3.5. Manganese (Mn)

Manganese is an essential element as an enzyme cofactor in several biological processes, including photosynthesis, lipid biosynthesis, and oxidative stress response, although excessive Mn is toxic to plants [235,236,237]. Mn is interchangeable with other divalent cations such as Ca, Cu, Mg, and Zn, but Mg mostly replaces Mn because soluble Mn2+ (reduced form) is rapidly oxidized to plant-unavailable Mn oxides, particularly in high pH soil. In addition, Mg2+ is present 50 to 100 times more in the cell [235,236]. Mn is an important cofactor for enzymes involved in various biochemical reactions such as RNA polymerases, terpene synthases in isoprenoid biosynthesis, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) in lipid biosynthesis, decarboxylases in the Kelvin Cycle, and various Golgi-localized glycosyl transferases [235,237,238]. However, Mn is indispensably required as a catalyst in the oxygen-evolving complex (OEC) of photosystem II (PSII), which splits water (H2O) into oxygen (O2) and produces electrons (light-induced water oxidation or photolysis of water, H2O → 2H+ + 2e + 1/2 O2) [239]. In addition, it serves as a cofactor of an antioxidant Mn superoxide dismutase (MnSOD, MSD) in mitochondria [196,240] and oxalate oxidase, which is secreted to apoplast catalyzing oxygen-dependent degradation of oxalate to CO2 and H2O2 and is involved in the pathogen defense response [241,242]. Various Mn transporters and ion chaperones are involved in Mn tissue and subcellular allocation and Mn homeostasis [235,236]. Thus, Mn deficiency or incorrect position of Mn results in a low photosynthetic rate and higher susceptibility to biotic and abiotic stresses [235]. Regarding reproductive development, Mn deficiency is reported to cause poor tasseling and to reduce anther development and pollen grain germination in maize [243]. Also, Mn homeostasis in the Golgi apparatus and protein glycosylation in Golgi seem important for pollen tube growth because the loss-of-function mutant of a cis-Golgi-localized Mn transporter, PML3 (photosynthesis-affected mutant 72-like3), exhibits impaired pollen tube growth and Golgi glycosylation [244,245]. Mn cation is required for Golgi-localized transferases for protein N-glycosylation and cytoplasmic UDP-glycosyl transferases (UGT) transferring a glycosyl moiety from UDP-sugars (uridine 5′-diphospho sugar) to various small acceptor molecules during secondary metabolites and phytohormone biosynthesis [246,247,248]. UGT87A2, an Arabidopsis UGT, regulates flowering time by reducing the expression of FLC, a floral repressor. The ugt87a2 mutant exhibits late flowering both in LD and SD with a high transcription level of FLC [249]. In addition, Arabidopsis MTM1 and MTM2, homologs of yeast MTM1 (manganese trafficking factor for mitochondrial SOD2), which activates mitochondrial MnSOD1 (MSD1) [250,251], regulate flowering time. The mtm1 mtm2 double mutant shows early flowering than wild-type and both single mutants [252]. However, the underlying mechanism of how these Mn-dependent proteins regulate flowering time in plants needs to be depicted further.

3.6. Molybdenum (Mo)

Molybdenum (Mo) is an essential element for plants, though only a minute amount is required because it serves as the active site for Mo-requiring enzymes (molybdoenzymes) involved in different redox reactions in plants. It is biologically inactive until it forms a molybdenum cofactor (Moco), a complex with proteins [253,254]. More than 50 proteins are predicted to contain Mo; however, only 5 molybdoenzymes are characterized in plants, including sulfite oxidase (which catalyzes the conversion of sulfite to sulfate, the final step in the oxidative degradation of sulfur-containing amino acids cysteine and methionine) [255], xanthine dehydrogenase (which catalyzes the oxidation of purines) [256], aldehyde oxidase [which oxidizes a range of aldehydes to their corresponding carboxylic acid and is critical for the biosynthesis of phytohormones such as abscisic acid (ABA) and indoleacetic acid (IAA)] [257], nitrate reductase (NR) [which catalyzes the first reaction in nitrate assimilation, the reduction of nitrate (NO3) to nitrite (NO2)] [258], and (mitochondrial) amidoxime reducing component ((m)ARC) (which reduces N-hydroxylated compounds) [259]. Thus, the symptoms of Mo deficiency are similar to those of loss of function of Mo transporters and carrier proteins, impaired assembly of Moco, and defective molybdoenzymes [254,260,261,262].
Regarding flowering time, Mo-deficient medium induced flowering in a free-floating aquatic plant, duckweed (Lemna paucicostata), independently from daylength, and the nitrate reductase (NR) activity was inhibited [263]. The NR activity was reduced during flowering and seed development in soybean (Glycine max) [264]. Molybdoenzymes, nitrate reductase (NR), and amidoxime-reducing component (ARC) are involved in nitrogen assimilation producing nitric oxide (NO), an important signaling molecule [259,265]. Nitrate delays the flowering time at SAM through the master regulators of nitrate signaling, NIN-LIKE PROTEIN (NLP6) and NPL7, and by repressing SOC1, SPL3 (SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE3), and SPL4 [266,267]. A mutant overproducing NO, nox1, shows delayed flowering, while a mutant with less NO, nos1, exhibits early flowering [268]. It turns out that NO delays flowering by downregulating CO and GI and their downstream LFY and by increasing FLC [268,269]. Also, a low amount of NO in the NR double mutant nia1 nia2 shows early flowering [270,271]. Notably, NO increases the amplitudes of circadian transcripts of CRYPTOCHROME1 (CRY1), LHY, CCA1, and TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1 (TOC1), but decreases the amplitudes of the circadian transcripts of CO and GI [269]. In addition, CO and GI proteins (but not other clock oscillators) were increased following enhanced NO level [269], suggesting that NO is involved in light and circadian regulation of flowering. Thus, Mo appears to participate in flowering time via nitrogen assimilation.

4. Perspectives and Conclusions

Recent studies have characterized the transcriptional regulation of floral-inducing or floral-identifying factors by transcription factors and enzymes. Secondary nutrients such as calcium, magnesium, and sulfur play vital roles in flowering and flower development through their involvement in various signal transduction pathways and the regulation of enzyme activities in diverse metabolisms. Additionally, these studies have underscored the importance of micronutrients as cofactors, as well as the roles of ion channels and transporters in plant growth and reproduction (Table 1). Although we suggested transcription factors and enzymes which possess microelement binding domains such as ZnFs and bHLHs, it is unclear how activities or stabilities of these proteins are altered under the microelement deficiency or excess. Additionally, due to the dosage-dependent photo-toxicity and the requirement of lower amounts for optimal plant nutrition, the biological and physiological mechanisms underlying the plant growth and flowering response to micronutrients are poorly understood. Specifically, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the conformational changes of proteins by microelements and the biochemical and molecular mechanisms that directly promote plant growth and flowering through micronutrients.
This review aims to comprehensively summarize various transcription factors and enzymes that rely on micronutrients as cofactors for their functional activation or catalytic activity enhancement, including ZnFs, bHLHs, and JMJs (Table 1). Further research is required to uncover the specific roles of micronutrients in functional activation of microelement-containing proteins and to establish the correlation between micronutrient homeostasis and flowering regulation. The studies on essential micronutrients and their influence on regulating flowering time will enhance our understanding of nutrient-mediated floral induction and floral regulatory mechanisms. The outcomes of these studies would help researchers plan potential strategies for crop breeding and productivity improvement as a long-term goal because control of flowering time in agricultural and horticultural plants is crucial for pollinator visitation, disease and pest management, and ultimately, crop yield and quality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.J.P.; writing—original draft preparation, S.E.J. and H.J.P.; writing—review and editing, J.S.S. and H.J.P.; supervision, H.J.P.; funding acquisition, H.J.P. and J.S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. 2022R1F1A1067928 to H.J.P. and 2021R1F1A1060339 to J.S.S.) and by Chonnam National University (2022-2672 to H.J.P. and 202233830001 to J.S.S.).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cho, L.-H.; Yoon, J.; An, G. The Control of Flowering Time by Environmental Factors. Plant J. 2017, 90, 708–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jackson, S.D. Plant Responses to Photoperiod. New Phytol. 2009, 181, 517–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kumari, V.V.; Banerjee, P.; Verma, V.C.; Sukumaran, S.; Chandran, M.A.S.; Gopinath, K.A.; Venkatesh, G.; Yadav, S.K.; Singh, V.K.; Awasthi, N.K. Plant Nutrition: An Effective Way to Alleviate Abiotic Stress in Agricultural Crops. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hajiboland, R. Effect of Micronutrient Deficiencies on Plants Stress Responses. In Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants: Metabolism, Productivity and Sustainability; Ahmad, P., Prasad, M.N.V., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 283–329. ISBN 978-1-4614-0634-1. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kazan, K.; Lyons, R. The Link between Flowering Time and Stress Tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Takeno, K. Stress-Induced Flowering: The Third Category of Flowering Response. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 4925–4934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Park, H.J.; Kim, W.-Y.; Pardo, J.M.; Yun, D.-J. Molecular Interactions between Flowering Time and Abiotic Stress Pathways. In International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; Volume 327, pp. 371–412. ISBN 978-0-12-804804-7. [Google Scholar]
  8. Munns, R.; Millar, A.H. Seven Plant Capacities to Adapt to Abiotic Stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 4308–4323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ye, J.Y.; Tian, W.H.; Jin, C.W. Nitrogen in Plants: From Nutrition to the Modulation of Abiotic Stress Adaptation. Stress Biol. 2022, 2, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Y.; Liu, B.; Kong, F.; Chen, L. Nutrient-Mediated Modulation of Flowering Time. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1101611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kumari, S.; Chhillar, H.; Chopra, P.; Khanna, R.R.; Khan, M.I.R. Potassium: A Track to Develop Salinity Tolerant Plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 167, 1011–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, S.; Liu, Y.; Du, M.; Shou, G.; Wang, Z.; Xu, G. Nitrogen as a Regulator for Flowering Time in Plant. Plant Soil 2022, 480, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kronzucker, H.J.; Coskun, D.; Schulze, L.M.; Wong, J.R.; Britto, D.T. Sodium as Nutrient and Toxicant. Plant Soil 2013, 369, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, K.; Wang, Y.; Han, C.; Zhang, W.; Jia, H.; Li, X. GA Signaling and CO/FT Regulatory Module Mediate Salt-Induced Late Flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Growth Regul. 2007, 53, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, W.-Y.; Ali, Z.; Park, H.J.; Park, S.J.; Cha, J.-Y.; Perez-Hormaeche, J.; Quintero, F.J.; Shin, G.; Kim, M.R.; Qiang, Z.; et al. Release of SOS2 Kinase from Sequestration with GIGANTEA Determines Salt Tolerance in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Park, H.J.; Gámez-Arjona, F.M.; Lindahl, M.; Aman, R.; Villalta, I.; Cha, J.-Y.; Carranco, R.; Lim, C.J.; García, E.; Bressan, R.A.; et al. S-Acylated and Nucleus-Localized SALT OVERLY SENSITIVE3/CALCINEURIN B-LIKE4 Stabilizes GIGANTEA to Regulate Arabidopsis Flowering Time under Salt Stress. Plant Cell 2023, 35, 298–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Brun, L.A.; Le Corff, J.; Maillet, J. Effects of Elevated Soil Copper on Phenology, Growth and Reproduction of Five Ruderal Plant Species. Environ. Pollut. 2003, 122, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ryser, P.; Sauder, W.R. Effects of Heavy-Metal-Contaminated Soil on Growth, Phenology and Biomass Turnover of Hieracium Piloselloides. Environ. Pollut. 2006, 140, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ye, T.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Hou, W.; Zhou, W.; Lu, J.; Xing, Y.; Li, X. Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium Fertilization Affects the Flowering Time of Rice (Oryza Sativa L.). Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2019, 20, e00753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Agbaje, G.O.; Oloyede, F.M.; Obisesan, I.O. Effects of NPK Fertilizer and Season on the Flowering and Sex Expression of Pumpkin (Cucurbita Pepo Linn.). Int. J. Agric. Sci. 2012, 2, 291–295. [Google Scholar]
  21. Reddy, A.S.N.; Ali, G.S.; Celesnik, H.; Day, I.S. Coping with Stresses: Roles of Calcium- and Calcium/Calmodulin-Regulated Gene Expression. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 2010–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kudla, J.; Becker, D.; Grill, E.; Hedrich, R.; Hippler, M.; Kummer, U.; Parniske, M.; Romeis, T.; Schumacher, K. Advances and Current Challenges in Calcium Signaling. New Phytol. 2018, 218, 414–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dodd, A.N.; Love, J.; Webb, A.A.R. The Plant Clock Shows Its Metal: Circadian Regulation of Cytosolic Free Ca2+. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Love, J.; Dodd, A.N.; Webb, A.A.R. Circadian and Diurnal Calcium Oscillations Encode Photoperiodic Information in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 956–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zeng, H.; Xu, L.; Singh, A.; Wang, H.; Du, L.; Poovaiah, B.W. Involvement of Calmodulin and Calmodulin-like Proteins in Plant Responses to Abiotic Stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Boudsocq, M.; Sheen, J. Stress Signaling II: Calcium Sensing and Signaling. In Abiotic Stress Adaptation in Plants; Pareek, A., Sopory, S.K., Bohnert, H.J., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 75–90. ISBN 978-90-481-3111-2. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yip Delormel, T.; Boudsocq, M. Properties and Functions of Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinases and Their Relatives in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2019, 224, 585–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Dekomah, S.D.; Bi, Z.; Dormatey, R.; Wang, Y.; Haider, F.U.; Sun, C.; Yao, P.; Bai, J. The Role of CDPKs in Plant Development, Nutrient and Stress Signaling. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 996203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Atif, R.M.; Shahid, L.; Waqas, M.; Ali, B.; Rashid, M.A.R.; Azeem, F.; Nawaz, M.A.; Wani, S.H.; Chung, G. Insights on Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinases (CPKs) Signaling for Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Friedman, H.; Goldschmidt, E.E.; Halevy, A.H. Involvement of Calcium in the Photoperiodic Flower Induction Process of Pharbitis Nil. Plant Physiol. 1989, 89, 530–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tretyn, A.; Czaplewska, J.; Cymerski, M.; Kopcewicz, J.; Kendrick, R.E. The Mechanism of Calcium Action on Flower Induction in Pharbitis Nil. J. Plant Physiol. 1994, 144, 562–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jaworski, K.; Szmidt-Jaworska, A.; Tretyn, A.; Kopcewicz, J. Calmodulin from Pharbitis Nil: Purification and Characterization. Biol. Plant. 2004, 48, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Delk, N.A.; Johnson, K.A.; Chowdhury, N.I.; Braam, J. CML24, Regulated in Expression by Diverse Stimuli, Encodes a Potential Ca2+ Sensor That Functions in Responses to Abscisic Acid, Daylength, and Ion Stress. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139, 240–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tsai, Y.-C.; Delk, N.A.; Chowdhury, N.I.; Braam, J. Arabidopsis Potential Calcium Sensors Regulate Nitric Oxide Levels and the Transition to Flowering. Plant Signal. Behav. 2007, 2, 446–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Martí Ruiz, M.C.; Hubbard, K.E.; Gardner, M.J.; Jung, H.J.; Aubry, S.; Hotta, C.T.; Mohd-Noh, N.I.; Robertson, F.C.; Hearn, T.J.; Tsai, Y.-C.; et al. Circadian Oscillations of Cytosolic Free Calcium Regulate the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock. Nat. Plants 2018, 4, 690–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jaworski, K.; Szmidt-Jaworska, A.; Tretyn, A.; Kopcewicz, J. Biochemical Evidence for a Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase from Pharbitis Nil and Its Involvement in Photoperiodic Flower Induction. Phytochemistry 2003, 62, 1047–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Jaworski, K.; Pawełek, A.; Kopcewicz, J.; Szmidt-Jaworska, A. The Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase (PnCDPK1) Is Involved in Pharbitis Nil Flowering. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 1578–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Li, X.; Chen, L.; Yao, L.; Zou, J.; Hao, J.; Wu, W. Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase CPK32 Mediates Calcium Signaling in Regulating Arabidopsis Flowering Time. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2022, 9, nwab180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Li, X.; Hu, D.; Cai, L.; Wang, H.; Liu, X.; Du, H.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Hu, Z.; Huang, F.; et al. CALCIUM-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE38 Regulates Flowering Time and Common Cutworm Resistance in Soybean. Plant Physiol. 2022, 190, 480–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Hua, W.; Zhang, L.; Liang, S.; Jones, R.L.; Lu, Y.-T. A Tobacco Calcium/Calmodulin-Binding Protein Kinase Functions as a Negative Regulator of Flowering. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 31483–31494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, Y.; Liang, S.; Xie, Q.-G.; Lu, Y.-T. Characterization of a Calmodulin-Regulated Ca2+-Dependent-Protein-Kinase-Related Protein Kinase, AtCRK1, from Arabidopsis. Biochem. J. 2004, 383, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sugano, S.; Andronis, C.; Green, R.M.; Wang, Z.-Y.; Tobin, E.M. Protein Kinase CK2 Interacts with and Phosphorylates the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock-Associated 1 Protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 11020–11025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sugano, S.; Andronis, C.; Ong, M.S.; Green, R.M.; Tobin, E.M. The Protein Kinase CK2 Is Involved in Regulation of Circadian Rhythms in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 12362–12366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, P.; Zhang, G.; Gonzales, N.; Guo, Y.; Hu, H.; Park, S.; Zhao, J. Ca2+-Regulated and Diurnal Rhythm-Regulated Na+/Ca2+ Exchanger AtNCL Affects Flowering Time and Auxin Signalling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 39, 377–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cheng, N.-H.; Pittman, J.K.; Barkla, B.J.; Shigaki, T.; Hirschi, K.D. The Arabidopsis Cax1 Mutant Exhibits Impaired Ion Homeostasis, Development, and Hormonal Responses and Reveals Interplay among Vacuolar Transporters. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 347–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, A.X.; Wang, D.Y. Regulation of the ALBINO3-Mediated Transition to Flowering in Arabidopsis Depends on the Expression of CO and GA1. Biol. Plant. 2009, 53, 484–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, D.; Xu, Y.; Li, Q.; Hao, X.; Cui, K.; Sun, F.; Zhu, Y. Transgenic Expression of a Putative Calcium Transporter Affects the Time of Arabidopsis Flowering. Plant J. 2003, 33, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Wang, D.-Y.; Li, Q.; Cui, K.-M.; Zhu, Y.-X. PPF1 May Suppress Plant Senescence via Activating TFL1 in Transgenic Arabidopsis Plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2008, 50, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Hermans, C.; Verbruggen, N. Physiological Characterization of Mg Deficiency in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 2153–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Matsushima, R.; Tang, L.Y.; Zhang, L.; Yamada, H.; Twell, D.; Sakamoto, W. A Conserved, Mg2+-Dependent Exonuclease Degrades Organelle DNA during Arabidopsis Pollen Development. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 1608–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Guo, W.; Nazim, H.; Liang, Z.; Yang, D. Magnesium Deficiency in Plants: An Urgent Problem. Crop J. 2016, 4, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chaudhry, A.H.; Nayab, S.; Hussain, S.B.; Ali, M.; Pan, Z. Current Understandings on Magnesium Deficiency and Future Outlooks for Sustainable Agriculture. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, J.; Huang, Y.; Tan, H.; Yang, X.; Tian, L.; Luan, S.; Chen, L.; Li, D. An Endoplasmic Reticulum Magnesium Transporter Is Essential for Pollen Development in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2015, 231, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xu, X.-F.; Wang, B.; Lou, Y.; Han, W.-J.; Lu, J.-Y.; Li, D.-D.; Li, L.-G.; Zhu, J.; Yang, Z.-N. Magnesium Transporter 5 Plays an Important Role in Mg Transport for Male Gametophyte Development in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2015, 84, 925–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Li, L.-G.; Sokolov, L.N.; Yang, Y.-H.; Li, D.-P.; Ting, J.; Pandy, G.K.; Luan, S. A Mitochondrial Magnesium Transporter Functions in Arabidopsis Pollen Development. Mol. Plant 2008, 1, 675–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Chen, J.; Li, L.; Liu, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Guo, L.; Mao, D.; Tian, L.; Chen, L.; Luan, S.; Li, D. Magnesium Transporter AtMGT9 Is Essential for Pollen Development in Arabidopsis. Cell Res. 2009, 19, 887–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ma, F.; Qi, H.; Hu, Y.-F.; Jiang, Q.-R.; Zhang, L.-G.; Xue, P.; Yang, F.-Q.; Wang, R.; Ju, Y.; Uchida, H.; et al. The Mitochondrial Endonuclease M20 Participates in the Down-Regulation of Mitochondrial DNA in Pollen Cells. Plant Physiol. 2018, 178, 1537–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Tang, L.Y.; Sakamoto, W. Tissue-Specific Organelle DNA Degradation Mediated by DPD1 Exonuclease. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 1391–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kobayashi, N.I.; Tanoi, K.; Nakanishi, T.M. Magnesium Localization in Shoot Apices during Flower Induction in Pharbitis Nil. Can. J. Bot. 2006, 84, 1908–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. De Melo, J.R.F.; Gutsch, A.; Caluwé, T.D.; Leloup, J.-C.; Gonze, D.; Hermans, C.; Webb, A.A.R.; Verbruggen, N. Magnesium Maintains the Length of the Circadian Period in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2021, 185, 519–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Rivière, Q.; Xiao, Q.; Gutsch, A.; Defrance, M.; Webb, A.A.R.; Verbruggen, N. Mg Deficiency Interacts with the Circadian Clock and Phytochromes Pathways in Arabidopsis. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2021, 178, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kopriva, S.; Mugford, S.G.; Matthewman, C.; Koprivova, A. Plant Sulfate Assimilation Genes: Redundancy versus Specialization. Plant Cell Rep. 2009, 28, 1769–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gläser, K.; Kanawati, B.; Kubo, T.; Schmitt-Kopplin, P.; Grill, E. Exploring the Arabidopsis Sulfur Metabolome. Plant J. 2014, 77, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Günal, S.; Hardman, R.; Kopriva, S.; Mueller, J.W. Sulfation Pathways from Red to Green. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 12293–12312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kopriva, S.; Mugford, S.G.; Baraniecka, P.; Lee, B.-R.; Matthewman, C.A.; Koprivova, A. Control of Sulfur Partitioning between Primary and Secondary Metabolism in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Lee, B.-R.; Huseby, S.; Koprivova, A.; Chételat, A.; Wirtz, M.; Mugford, S.T.; Navid, E.; Brearley, C.; Saha, S.; Mithen, R.; et al. Effects of Fou8/Fry1 Mutation on Sulfur Metabolism: Is Decreased Internal Sulfate the Trigger of Sulfate Starvation Response? PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e39425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Xiong, L.; Lee, B.; Ishitani, M.; Lee, H.; Zhang, C.; Zhu, J.-K. FIERY1 Encoding an Inositol Polyphosphate 1-Phosphatase Is a Negative Regulator of Abscisic Acid and Stress Signaling in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 1971–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Estavillo, G.M.; Crisp, P.A.; Pornsiriwong, W.; Wirtz, M.; Collinge, D.; Carrie, C.; Giraud, E.; Whelan, J.; David, P.; Javot, H.; et al. Evidence for a SAL1-PAP Chloroplast Retrograde Pathway That Functions in Drought and High Light Signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 3992–4012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Xiong, L.; Lee, H.; Huang, R.; Zhu, J.-K. A Single Amino Acid Substitution in the Arabidopsis FIERY1/HOS2 Protein Confers Cold Signaling Specificity and Lithium Tolerance: FIERY1/HOS2 Signaling. Plant J. 2004, 40, 536–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Gy, I.; Gasciolli, V.; Lauressergues, D.; Morel, J.-B.; Gombert, J.; Proux, F.; Proux, C.; Vaucheret, H.; Mallory, A.C. Arabidopsis FIERY1, XRN2, and XRN3 Are Endogenous RNA Silencing Suppressors. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 3451–3461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. You, C.; He, W.; Hang, R.; Zhang, C.; Cao, X.; Guo, H.; Chen, X.; Cui, J.; Mo, B. FIERY1 Promotes MicroRNA Accumulation by Suppressing RRNA-Derived Small Interfering RNAs in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rodríguez, V.M.; Chételat, A.; Majcherczyk, P.; Farmer, E.E. Chloroplastic Phosphoadenosine Phosphosulfate Metabolism Regulates Basal Levels of the Prohormone Jasmonic Acid in Arabidopsis Leaves. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 1335–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chan, K.X.; Mabbitt, P.D.; Phua, S.Y.; Mueller, J.W.; Nisar, N.; Gigolashvili, T.; Stroeher, E.; Grassl, J.; Arlt, W.; Estavillo, G.M.; et al. Sensing and Signaling of Oxidative Stress in Chloroplasts by Inactivation of the SAL1 Phosphoadenosine Phosphatase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, e4567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wilson, P.B.; Estavillo, G.M.; Field, K.J.; Pornsiriwong, W.; Carroll, A.J.; Howell, K.A.; Woo, N.S.; Lake, J.A.; Smith, S.M.; Harvey Millar, A.; et al. The Nucleotidase/Phosphatase SAL1 Is a Negative Regulator of Drought Tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009, 58, 299–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Robles, P.; Fleury, D.; Candela, H.; Cnops, G.; Alonso-Peral, M.M.; Anami, S.; Falcone, A.; Caldana, C.; Willmitzer, L.; Ponce, M.R.; et al. The RON1/FRY1/SAL1 Gene Is Required for Leaf Morphogenesis and Venation Patterning in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 1357–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Chen, H.; Xiong, L. The Bifunctional Abiotic Stress Signalling Regulator and Endogenous RNA Silencing Suppressor FIERY1 Is Required for Lateral Root Formation: FIERY1 and Lateral Root Formation. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 2180–2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Litthauer, S.; Chan, K.X.; Jones, M.A. 3′-Phosphoadenosine 5′-Phosphate Accumulation Delays the Circadian System. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 3120–3135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Kim, B.-H.; Von Arnim, A.G. FIERY1 Regulates Light-Mediated Repression of Cell Elongation and Flowering Time via Its 3′(2′),5′-Bisphosphate Nucleotidase Activity. Plant J. 2009, 58, 208–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Noctor, G.; Queval, G.; Mhamdi, A.; Chaouch, S.; Foyer, C.H. Glutathione. Arab. Book 2011, 9, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Noctor, G.; Mhamdi, A.; Chaouch, S.; Han, Y.; Neukermans, J.; Marquez-Garcia, B.; Queval, G.; Foyer, C.H. Glutathione in Plants: An Integrated Overview: Glutathione Status and Functions. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 454–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Noctor, G.; Gomez, L.; Vanacker, H.; Foyer, C.H. Interactions between Biosynthesis, Compartmentation and Transport in the Control of Glutathione Homeostasis and Signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 1283–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chen, J.-H.; Jiang, H.-W.; Hsieh, E.-J.; Chen, H.-Y.; Chien, C.-T.; Hsieh, H.-L.; Lin, T.-P. Drought and Salt Stress Tolerance of an Arabidopsis Glutathione S-Transferase U17 Knockout Mutant Are Attributed to the Combined Effect of Glutathione and Abscisic Acid. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158, 340–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Parisy, V.; Poinssot, B.; Owsianowski, L.; Buchala, A.; Glazebrook, J.; Mauch, F. Identification of PAD2 as a γ-Glutamylcysteine Synthetase Highlights the Importance of Glutathione in Disease Resistance of Arabidopsis: Glutathione Deficiency and Arabidopsis Disease Resistance. Plant J. 2006, 49, 159–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wingate, V.P.M.; Lawton, M.A.; Lamb, C.J. Glutathione Causes a Massive and Selective Induction of Plant Defense Genes. Plant Physiol. 1988, 87, 206–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Cheng, M.; Ko, K.; Chang, W.; Kuo, W.; Chen, G.; Lin, T. Increased Glutathione Contributes to Stress Tolerance and Global Translational Changes in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2015, 83, 926–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Blevins, D.G.; Lukaszewski, K.M. Boron in Plant Structure and Function. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1998, 49, 481–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Brown, P.H.; Bellaloui, N.; Wimmer, M.A.; Bassil, E.S.; Ruiz, J.; Hu, H.; Pfeffer, H.; Dannel, F.; Römheld, V. Boron in Plant Biology. Plant Biol. 2002, 4, 205–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Pereira, G.L.; Siqueira, J.A.; Batista-Silva, W.; Cardoso, F.B.; Nunes-Nesi, A.; Araújo, W.L. Boron: More than an Essential Element for Land Plants? Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 610307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Dell, B.; Huang, L. Physiological Response of Plants to Low Boron. Plant Soil 1997, 193, 103–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Landi, M.; Margaritopoulou, T.; Papadakis, I.E.; Araniti, F. Boron Toxicity in Higher Plants: An Update. Planta 2019, 250, 1011–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Brdar-Jokanović, M. Boron Toxicity and Deficiency in Agricultural Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Eaton, F. Deficiency, Toxicity and Accumulation of Boron in Plants. J. Agricutural Res. 1944, 69, 2237. [Google Scholar]
  93. Funakawa, H.; Miwa, K. Synthesis of Borate Cross-Linked Rhamnogalacturonan II. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Routray, P.; Li, T.; Yamasaki, A.; Yoshinari, A.; Takano, J.; Choi, W.G.; Sams, C.E.; Roberts, D.M. Nodulin Intrinsic Protein 7;1 Is a Tapetal Boric Acid Channel Involved in Pollen Cell Wall Formation. Plant Physiol. 2018, 178, 1269–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Di Giorgio, J.A.P.; Bienert, G.P.; Ayub, N.D.; Yaneff, A.; Barberini, M.L.; Mecchia, M.A.; Amodeo, G.; Soto, G.C.; Muschietti, J.P. Pollen-Specific Aquaporins NIP4;1 and NIP4;2 Are Required for Pollen Development and Pollination in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2016, 28, 1053–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Tanaka, N.; Uraguchi, S.; Saito, A.; Kajikawa, M.; Kasai, K.; Sato, Y.; Nagamura, Y.; Fujiwara, T. Roles of Pollen-Specific Boron Efflux Transporter, OsBOR4, in the Rice Fertilization Process. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013, 54, 2011–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Diehn, T.A.; Bienert, M.D.; Pommerrenig, B.; Liu, Z.; Spitzer, C.; Bernhardt, N.; Fuge, J.; Bieber, A.; Richet, N.; Chaumont, F.; et al. Boron Demanding Tissues of Brassica Napus Express Specific Sets of Functional Nodulin26-like Intrinsic Proteins and BOR 1 Transporters. Plant J. 2019, 100, 68–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Sakamoto, T.; Tsujimoto-Inui, Y.; Sotta, N.; Hirakawa, T.; Matsunaga, T.M.; Fukao, Y.; Matsunaga, S.; Fujiwara, T. Proteasomal Degradation of BRAHMA Promotes Boron Tolerance in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Hurtado, L.; Farrona, S.; Reyes, J.C. The Putative SWI/SNF Complex Subunit BRAHMA Activates Flower Homeotic Genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 62, 291–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Farrona, S.; Hurtado, L.; Bowman, J.L.; Reyes, J.C. The Arabidopsis thaliana SNF2 Homolog AtBRM Controls Shoot Development and Flowering. Development 2004, 131, 4965–4975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Tang, X.; Hou, A.; Babu, M.; Nguyen, V.; Hurtado, L.; Lu, Q.; Reyes, J.C.; Wang, A.; Keller, W.A.; Harada, J.J.; et al. The Arabidopsis BRAHMA Chromatin-Remodeling ATPase Is Involved in Repression of Seed Maturation Genes in Leaves. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 1143–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wu, M.-F.; Sang, Y.; Bezhani, S.; Yamaguchi, N.; Han, S.-K.; Li, Z.; Su, Y.; Slewinski, T.L.; Wagner, D. SWI2/SNF2 Chromatin Remodeling ATPases Overcome Polycomb Repression and Control Floral Organ Identity with the LEAFY and SEPALLATA3 Transcription Factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 3576–3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Han, S.-K.; Sang, Y.; Rodrigues, A.; BIOL425 F2010; Wu, M.-F.; Rodriguez, P.L.; Wagner, D. The SWI2/SNF2 Chromatin Remodeling ATPase BRAHMA Represses Abscisic Acid Responses in the Absence of the Stress Stimulus in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 4892–4906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Li, T.; Zhang, R.; Satheesh, V.; Wang, P.; Ma, G.; Guo, J.; An, G.; Lei, M. The Chromatin Remodeler BRAHMA Recruits HISTONE DEACETYLASE6 to Regulate Root Growth Inhibition in Response to Phosphate Starvation in Arabidopsis. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2022, 64, 2314–2326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Li, C.; Chen, C.; Gao, L.; Yang, S.; Nguyen, V.; Shi, X.; Siminovitch, K.; Kohalmi, S.E.; Huang, S.; Wu, K.; et al. The Arabidopsis SWI2/SNF2 Chromatin Remodeler BRAHMA Regulates Polycomb Function during Vegetative Development and Directly Activates the Flowering Repressor Gene SVP. PLOS Genet. 2015, 11, e1004944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Farrona, S.; Hurtado, L.; March-Díaz, R.; Schmitz, R.J.; Florencio, F.J.; Turck, F.; Amasino, R.M.; Reyes, J.C. Brahma Is Required for Proper Expression of the Floral Repressor FLC in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Richter, R.; Kinoshita, A.; Vincent, C.; Martinez-Gallegos, R.; Gao, H.; Van Driel, A.D.; Hyun, Y.; Mateos, J.L.; Coupland, G. Floral Regulators FLC and SOC1 Directly Regulate Expression of the B3-Type Transcription Factor TARGET OF FLC AND SVP 1 at the Arabidopsis Shoot Apex via Antagonistic Chromatin Modifications. PLOS Genet. 2019, 15, e1008065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Yang, J.; Xu, Y.; Wang, J.; Gao, S.; Huang, Y.; Hung, F.-Y.; Li, T.; Li, Q.; Yue, L.; Wu, K.; et al. The Chromatin Remodelling ATPase BRAHMA Interacts with GATA-Family Transcription Factor GNC to Regulate Flowering Time in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 835–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Zhang, C.; Jian, M.; Li, W.; Yao, X.; Tan, C.; Qian, Q.; Hu, Y.; Liu, X.; Hou, X. Gibberellin Signaling Modulates Flowering via the DELLA–BRAHMA–NF-YC Module in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2023, 35, 3470–3484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Saleem, M.H.; Usman, K.; Rizwan, M.; Al Jabri, H.; Alsafran, M. Functions and Strategies for Enhancing Zinc Availability in Plants for Sustainable Agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1033092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Przedpelska-Wasowicz, E.; Wasowicz, P. Does Zinc Concentration in the Substrate Influence the Onset of Flowering in Arabidopsis arenosa (Brassicaceae)? Plant Growth Regul. 2013, 69, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Saikia, P.; Talukdar, M.C.; Das, P. Optimization of Zinc, Magnesium and Calcium on Growth and Flowering of Rhynchostylis Retusa L. Acta Sci. Agric. 2018, 2, 12–15. [Google Scholar]
  113. Kumar, D.; Sahu, T.L.; Netam, N.; Patel, S.; Mandavi, G.; Kumar, N. Effect of Foliar Application of Zinc and Iron on Growth, Flowering and Yield of Gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.). Pharma Innov. J. 2022, 11, 2587–2589. [Google Scholar]
  114. Khosa, S.S.; Younis, A.; Rayit, A.; Yasmeen, S.; Riaz, A. Effect of Foliar Application of Macro and Micro Nutrients on Growth and Flowering of Gerbera Jamesonii L. Am.-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2011, 11, 736–757. [Google Scholar]
  115. Yilmaz, A.; Ekiz, H.; Gültekin, I.; Torun, B.; Barut, H.; Karanlik, S.; Cakmak, I. Effect of Seed Zinc Content on Grain Yield and Zinc Concentration of Wheat Grown in Zinc-deficient Calcareous Soils. J. Plant Nutr. 1998, 21, 2257–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ajouri, A.; Asgedom, H.; Becker, M. Seed Priming Enhances Germination and Seedling Growth of Barley under Conditions of P and Zn Deficiency. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2004, 167, 630–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Laware, S.L.; Raskar, S. Influence of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles on Growth, Flowering and Seed Productivity in Onion. Ina. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2014, 3, 874–881. [Google Scholar]
  118. Xie, M.; Sun, J.; Gong, D.; Kong, Y. The Roles of Arabidopsis C1-2i Subclass of C2H2-Type Zinc-Finger Transcription Factors. Genes 2019, 10, 653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Han, G.; Lu, C.; Guo, J.; Qiao, Z.; Sui, N.; Qiu, N.; Wang, B. C2H2 Zinc Finger Proteins: Master Regulators of Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Han, G.; Qiao, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, B. The Roles of CCCH Zinc-Finger Proteins in Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ciftci-Yilmaz, S.; Mittler, R. The Zinc Finger Network of Plants. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2008, 65, 1150–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Lyu, T.; Cao, J. Cys2/His2 Zinc-Finger Proteins in Transcriptional Regulation of Flower Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Sawa, S.; Ito, T.; Shimura, Y.; Okada, K. FILAMENTOUS FLOWER Controls the Formation and Development of Arabidopsis Inflorescences and Floral Meristems. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 69–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Sawa, S.; Watanabe, K.; Goto, K.; Kanaya, E.; Morita, E.H.; Okada, K. FILAMENTOUS FLOWER, a Meristem and Organ Identity Gene of Arabidopsis, Encodes a Protein with a Zinc Finger and HMG-Related Domains. Genes Dev. 1999, 13, 1079–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Chen, M.; Ni, M. RFI2, a RING-Domain Zinc Finger Protein, Negatively Regulates CONSTANS Expression and Photoperiodic Flowering. Plant J. 2006, 46, 823–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Yasui, Y.; Mukougawa, K.; Uemoto, M.; Yokofuji, A.; Suzuri, R.; Nishitani, A.; Kohchi, T. The Phytochrome-Interacting VASCULAR PLANT ONE–ZINC FINGER1 and VOZ2 Redundantly Regulate Flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 3248–3263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Celesnik, H.; Ali, G.S.; Robison, F.M.; Reddy, A.S.N. Arabidopsis thaliana VOZ (Vascular Plant One-Zinc Finger) Transcription Factors Are Required for Proper Regulation of Flowering Time. Biol. Open 2013, 2, 424–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Yasui, Y.; Kohchi, T. VASCULAR PLANT ONE-ZINC FINGER1 and VOZ2 Repress the FLOWERING LOCUS C Clade Members to Control Flowering Time in Arabidopsis. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2014, 78, 1850–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Wang, W.; Zheng, H.; Wang, Y.; Han, G.; Sui, N. Overexpression of CCCH Zinc Finger Protein Gene Delays Flowering Time and Enhances Salt Tolerance in Arabidopsis by Increasing Fatty Acid Unsaturation. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2018, 40, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Chao, Y.; Zhang, T.; Yang, Q.; Kang, J.; Sun, Y.; Gruber, M.Y.; Qin, Z. Expression of the Alfalfa CCCH-Type Zinc Finger Protein Gene MsZFN Delays Flowering Time in Transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci. 2014, 215–216, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Wang, M.; Zhang, H.; Dai, S.; Feng, S.; Gong, S.; Wang, J.; Zhou, A. AaZFP3, a Novel CCCH-Type Zinc Finger Protein from Adonis Amurensis, Promotes Early Flowering in Arabidopsis by Regulating the Expression of Flowering-Related Genes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Yan, Z.; Jia, J.; Yan, X.; Shi, H.; Han, Y. Arabidopsis KHZ1 and KHZ2, Two Novel Non-Tandem CCCH Zinc-Finger and K-Homolog Domain Proteins, Have Redundant Roles in the Regulation of Flowering and Senescence. Plant Mol. Biol. 2017, 95, 549–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Gao, H.; Zheng, X.-M.; Fei, G.; Chen, J.; Jin, M.; Ren, Y.; Wu, W.; Zhou, K.; Sheng, P.; Zhou, F.; et al. Ehd4 Encodes a Novel and Oryza-Genus-Specific Regulator of Photoperiodic Flowering in Rice. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Doi, K.; Izawa, T.; Fuse, T.; Yamanouchi, U.; Kubo, T.; Shimatani, Z.; Yano, M.; Yoshimura, A. Ehd1, a B-Type Response Regulator in Rice, Confers Short-Day Promotion of Flowering and Controls FT-like Gene Expression Independently of Hd1. Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 926–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Weingartner, M.; Subert, C.; Sauer, N. LATE, a C2H2 Zinc-Finger Protein That Acts as Floral Repressor. Plant J. 2011, 68, 681–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Krichevsky, A.; Gutgarts, H.; Kozlovsky, S.V.; Tzfira, T.; Sutton, A.; Sternglanz, R.; Mandel, G.; Citovsky, V. C2H2 Zinc Finger-SET Histone Methyltransferase Is a Plant-Specific Chromatin Modifier. Dev. Biol. 2007, 303, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Kim, S.; Choi, K.; Park, C.; Hwang, H.-J.; Lee, I. SUPPRESSOR OF FRIGIDA4, Encoding a C2H2-Type Zinc Finger Protein, Represses Flowering by Transcriptional Activation of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS C. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 2985–2998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Kim, S.Y.; Michaels, S.D. SUPPRESSOR OF FRI 4 Encodes a Nuclear-Localized Protein That Is Required for Delayed Flowering in Winter-Annual Arabidopsis. Development 2006, 133, 4699–4707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Jiang, D.; Gu, X.; He, Y. Establishment of the Winter-Annual Growth Habit via FRIGIDA -Mediated Histone Methylation at FLOWERING LOCUS C in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 1733–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Kim, S.Y.; He, Y.; Jacob, Y.; Noh, Y.-S.; Michaels, S.; Amasino, R. Establishment of the Vernalization-Responsive, Winter-Annual Habit in Arabidopsis Requires a Putative Histone H3 Methyl Transferase. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 3301–3310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Ma, Y.; Dong, J.; Yang, W.; Chen, L.; Wu, W.; Li, W.; Zhou, L.; Wang, J.; Chen, J.; Yang, T.; et al. OsFLZ2 Interacts with OsMADS51 to Fine-Tune Rice Flowering Time. Development 2022, 149, dev200862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Colasanti, J.; Yuan, Z.; Sundaresan, V. The Indeterminate Gene Encodes a Zinc Finger Protein and Regulates a Leaf-Generated Signal Required for the Transition to Flowering in Maize. Cell 1998, 93, 593–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Kozaki, A.; Hake, S.; Colasanti, J. The Maize ID1 Flowering Time Regulator Is a Zinc Finger Protein with Novel DNA Binding Properties. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1710–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Matsubara, K.; Yamanouchi, U.; Wang, Z.-X.; Minobe, Y.; Izawa, T.; Yano, M. Ehd2, a Rice Ortholog of the Maize INDETERMINATE1 Gene, Promotes Flowering by Up-Regulating Ehd1. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148, 1425–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Deng, L.; Li, L.; Zhang, S.; Shen, J.; Li, S.; Hu, S.; Peng, Q.; Xiao, J.; Wu, C. Suppressor of Rid1 (SID1) Shares Common Targets with RID1 on Florigen Genes to Initiate Floral Transition in Rice. PLOS Genet. 2017, 13, e1006642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Noh, B.; Lee, S.-H.; Kim, H.-J.; Yi, G.; Shin, E.-A.; Lee, M.; Jung, K.-J.; Doyle, M.R.; Amasino, R.M.; Noh, Y.-S. Divergent Roles of a Pair of Homologous Jumonji/Zinc-Finger–Class Transcription Factor Proteins in the Regulation of Arabidopsis Flowering Time. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 2601–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Yang, H.; Howard, M.; Dean, C. Physical Coupling of Activation and Derepression Activities to Maintain an Active Transcriptional State at FLC. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 9369–9374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Hou, X.; Zhou, J.; Liu, C.; Liu, L.; Shen, L.; Yu, H. Nuclear Factor Y-Mediated H3K27me3 Demethylation of the SOC1 Locus Orchestrates Flowering Responses of Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Zheng, S.; Hu, H.; Ren, H.; Yang, Z.; Qiu, Q.; Qi, W.; Liu, X.; Chen, X.; Cui, X.; Li, S.; et al. The Arabidopsis H3K27me3 Demethylase JUMONJI 13 Is a Temperature and Photoperiod Dependent Flowering Repressor. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Yokoo, T.; Saito, H.; Yoshitake, Y.; Xu, Q.; Asami, T.; Tsukiyama, T.; Teraishi, M.; Okumoto, Y.; Tanisaka, T. Se14, Encoding a JmjC Domain-Containing Protein, Plays Key Roles in Long-Day Suppression of Rice Flowering through the Demethylation of H3K4me3 of RFT1. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e96064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Lu, F.; Cui, X.; Zhang, S.; Liu, C.; Cao, X. JMJ14 Is an H3K4 Demethylase Regulating Flowering Time in Arabidopsis. Cell Res. 2010, 20, 387–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Jeong, J.-H.; Song, H.-R.; Ko, J.-H.; Jeong, Y.-M.; Kwon, Y.E.; Seol, J.H.; Amasino, R.M.; Noh, B.; Noh, Y.-S. Repression of FLOWERING LOCUS T Chromatin by Functionally Redundant Histone H3 Lysine 4 Demethylases in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e8033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Yang, W.; Jiang, D.; Jiang, J.; He, Y. A Plant-Specific Histone H3 Lysine 4 Demethylase Represses the Floral Transition in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2010, 62, 663–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Wang, Y.; Gu, X.; Yuan, W.; Schmitz, R.J.; He, Y. Photoperiodic Control of the Floral Transition through a Distinct Polycomb Repressive Complex. Dev. Cell 2014, 28, 727–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. He, X.; Wang, Q.; Pan, J.; Liu, B.; Ruan, Y.; Huang, Y. Systematic Analysis of JmjC Gene Family and Stress -Response Expression of KDM5 Subfamily Genes in Brassica Napus. PeerJ 2021, 9, e11137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Yang, H.; Han, Z.; Cao, Y.; Fan, D.; Li, H.; Mo, H.; Feng, Y.; Liu, L.; Wang, Z.; Yue, Y.; et al. A Companion Cell–Dominant and Developmentally Regulated H3K4 Demethylase Controls Flowering Time in Arabidopsis via the Repression of FLC Expression. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Yang, H.; Mo, H.; Fan, D.; Cao, Y.; Cui, S.; Ma, L. Overexpression of a Histone H3K4 Demethylase, JMJ15, Accelerates Flowering Time in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2012, 31, 1297–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Putterill, J.; Robson, F.; Lee, K.; Simon, R.; Coupland, G. The CONSTANS Gene of Arabidopsis Promotes Flowering and Encodes a Protein Showing Similarities to Zinc Finger Transcription Factors. Cell 1995, 80, 847–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Hassidim, M.; Harir, Y.; Yakir, E.; Kron, I.; Green, R.M. Over-Expression of CONSTANS-LIKE 5 Can Induce Flowering in Short-Day Grown Arabidopsis. Planta 2009, 230, 481–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Cheng, X.-F.; Wang, Z.-Y. Overexpression of COL9, a CONSTANS-LIKE Gene, Delays Flowering by Reducing Expression of CO and FT in Arabidopsis thaliana: Overexpression of COL9 Delays Flowering. Plant J. 2005, 43, 758–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Park, H.-Y.; Lee, S.-Y.; Seok, H.-Y.; Kim, S.-H.; Sung, Z.R.; Moon, Y.-H. EMF1 Interacts with EIP1, EIP6 or EIP9 Involved in the Regulation of Flowering Time in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 1376–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Tripathi, P.; Carvallo, M.; Hamilton, E.E.; Preuss, S.; Kay, S.A. Arabidopsis B-BOX32 Interacts with CONSTANS-LIKE3 to Regulate Flowering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Yano, M.; Katayose, Y.; Ashikari, M.; Yamanouchi, U.; Monna, L.; Fuse, T.; Baba, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Umehara, Y.; Nagamura, Y.; et al. Hd1, a Major Photoperiod Sensitivity Quantitative Trait Locus in Rice, Is Closely Related to the Arabidopsis Flowering Time Gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 2473–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Kim, S.-K.; Yun, C.-H.; Lee, J.H.; Jang, Y.H.; Park, H.-Y.; Kim, J.-K. OsCO3, a CONSTANS-LIKE Gene, Controls Flowering by Negatively Regulating the Expression of FT-like Genes under SD Conditions in Rice. Planta 2008, 228, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Yang, Y.; Ma, C.; Xu, Y.; Wei, Q.; Imtiaz, M.; Lan, H.; Gao, S.; Cheng, L.; Wang, M.; Fei, Z.; et al. A Zinc Finger Protein Regulates Flowering Time and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Chrysanthemum by Modulating Gibberellin Biosynthesis. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 2038–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Englbrecht, C.C.; Schoof, H.; Böhm, S. Conservation, Diversification and Expansion of C2H2 Zinc Finger Proteins in the Arabidopsis thaliana Genome. BMC Genom. 2004, 5, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Huang, Y.; Chen, D.; Liu, C.; Shen, W.; Ruan, Y. Evolution and Conservation of JmjC Domain Proteins in the Green Lineage. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2016, 291, 33–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Gan, E.-S.; Xu, Y.; Wong, J.-Y.; Geraldine Goh, J.; Sun, B.; Wee, W.-Y.; Huang, J.; Ito, T. Jumonji Demethylases Moderate Precocious Flowering at Elevated Temperature via Regulation of FLC in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Maruoka, T.; Gan, E.-S.; Otsuka, N.; Shirakawa, M.; Ito, T. Histone Demethylases JMJ30 and JMJ32 Modulate the Speed of Vernalization Through the Activation of FLOWERING LOCUS C in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 837831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Klose, R.J.; Kallin, E.M.; Zhang, Y. JmjC-Domain-Containing Proteins and Histone Demethylation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006, 7, 715–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Mosammaparast, N.; Shi, Y. Reversal of Histone Methylation: Biochemical and Molecular Mechanisms of Histone Demethylases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2010, 79, 155–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Dutta, A.; Choudhary, P.; Caruana, J.; Raina, R. JMJ 27, an Arabidopsis H3K9 Histone Demethylase, Modulates Defense against Pseudomonas Syringae and Flowering Time. Plant J. 2017, 91, 1015–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Briat, J.-F.; Dubos, C.; Gaymard, F. Iron Nutrition, Biomass Production, and Plant Product Quality. Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Gao, F.; Dubos, C. Transcriptional Integration of Plant Responses to Iron Availability. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 2056–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Hong, S.; Kim, S.A.; Guerinot, M.L.; McClung, C.R. Reciprocal Interaction of the Circadian Clock with the Iron Homeostasis Network in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2013, 161, 893–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Chen, Y.-Y.; Wang, Y.; Shin, L.-J.; Wu, J.-F.; Shanmugam, V.; Tsednee, M.; Lo, J.-C.; Chen, C.-C.; Wu, S.-H.; Yeh, K.-C. Iron Is Involved in the Maintenance of Circadian Period Length in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2013, 161, 1409–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Salomé, P.A.; Oliva, M.; Weigel, D.; Krämer, U. Circadian Clock Adjustment to Plant Iron Status Depends on Chloroplast and Phytochrome Function. EMBO J. 2012, 32, 511–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Gao, F.; Robe, K.; Gaymard, F.; Izquierdo, E.; Dubos, C. The Transcriptional Control of Iron Homeostasis in Plants: A Tale of BHLH Transcription Factors? Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Hao, Y.; Zong, X.; Ren, P.; Qian, Y.; Fu, A. Basic Helix-Loop-Helix (BHLH) Transcription Factors Regulate a Wide Range of Functions in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Wang, N.; Cui, Y.; Liu, Y.; Fan, H.; Du, J.; Huang, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Wu, H.; Ling, H.-Q. Requirement and Functional Redundancy of Ib Subgroup BHLH Proteins for Iron Deficiency Responses and Uptake in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 503–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Chen, W.; Zhao, L.; Liu, L.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Liang, G.; Wang, H.; Yu, D. Iron Deficiency-Induced Transcription Factors BHLH38/100/101 Negatively Modulate Flowering Time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci. 2021, 308, 110929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Sivitz, A.B.; Hermand, V.; Curie, C.; Vert, G. Arabidopsis BHLH100 and BHLH101 Control Iron Homeostasis via a FIT-Independent Pathway. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Wild, M.; Davière, J.-M.; Regnault, T.; Sakvarelidze-Achard, L.; Carrera, E.; Lopez Diaz, I.; Cayrel, A.; Dubeaux, G.; Vert, G.; Achard, P. Tissue-Specific Regulation of Gibberellin Signaling Fine-Tunes Arabidopsis Iron-Deficiency Responses. Dev. Cell 2016, 37, 190–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Cheng, H.; Qin, L.; Lee, S.; Fu, X.; Richards, D.E.; Cao, D.; Luo, D.; Harberd, N.P.; Peng, J. Gibberellin Regulates Arabidopsis Floral Development via Suppression of DELLA Protein Function. Development 2004, 131, 1055–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Han, Y.-F.; Huang, H.-W.; Li, L.; Cai, T.; Chen, S.; He, X.-J. The Cytosolic Iron-Sulfur Cluster Assembly Protein MMS19 Regulates Transcriptional Gene Silencing, DNA Repair, and Flowering Time in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0129137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Duan, C.-G.; Wang, X.; Tang, K.; Zhang, H.; Mangrauthia, S.K.; Lei, M.; Hsu, C.-C.; Hou, Y.-J.; Wang, C.; Li, Y.; et al. MET18 Connects the Cytosolic Iron-Sulfur Cluster Assembly Pathway to Active DNA Demethylation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2015, 11, e1005559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Wang, X.; Li, Q.; Yuan, W.; Cao, Z.; Qi, B.; Kumar, S.; Li, Y.; Qian, W. The Cytosolic Fe-S Cluster Assembly Component MET18 Is Required for the Full Enzymatic Activity of ROS1 in Active DNA Demethylation. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Burkhead, J.L.; Gogolin Reynolds, K.A.; Abdel-Ghany, S.E.; Cohu, C.M.; Pilon, M. Copper Homeostasis. New Phytol. 2009, 182, 799–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Ravet, K.; Pilon, M. Copper and Iron Homeostasis in Plants: The Challenges of Oxidative Stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 19, 919–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Sandmann, G.; Böger, P. Copper-Mediated Lipid Peroxidation Processes in Photosynthetic Membranes. Plant Physiol. 1980, 66, 797–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Yruela, I.; Alfonso, M.; Ortiz De Zarate, I.; Montoya, G.; Picorel, R. Precise Location of the Cu(II)-Inhibitory Binding Site in Higher Plant and Bacterial Photosynthetic Reaction Centers as Probed by Light-Induced Absorption Changes. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 1684–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Katoh, S. A New Copper Protein from Chlorella Ellipsoidea. Nature 1960, 186, 533–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Redinbo, M.R.; Yeates, T.O.; Merchant, S. Plastocyanin: Structural and Functional Analysis. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 1994, 26, 49–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Weigel, M.; Varotto, C.; Pesaresi, P.; Finazzi, G.; Rappaport, F.; Salamini, F.; Leister, D. Plastocyanin Is Indispensable for Photosynthetic Electron Flow in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 31286–31289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Carr, H.S.; Winge, D.R. Assembly of Cytochrome c Oxidase within the Mitochondrion. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Bowler, C.; Montagu, M.V.; Inze, D. Superoxide Dismutase and Stress Tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1992, 43, 83–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Gavnholt, B.; Larsen, K. Molecular Biology of Plant Laccases in Relation to Lignin Formation. Physiol. Plant 2002, 116, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Rea, G.; Metoui, O.; Infantino, A.; Federico, R.; Angelini, R. Copper Amine Oxidase Expression in Defense Responses to Wounding and Ascochyta Rabiei Invasion. Plant Physiol. 2002, 128, 865–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Sullivan, M.L. Beyond Brown: Polyphenol Oxidases as Enzymes of Plant Specialized Metabolism. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 5, 783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Mayer, A.M. Polyphenol Oxidases in Plants and Fungi: Going Places? A Review. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 2318–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Dong, J.; Kim, S.T.; Lord, E.M. Plantacyanin Plays a Role in Reproduction in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138, 778–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Cohu, C.M.; Pilon, M. Cell Biology of Copper. In Cell Biology of Metals and Nutrients; Hell, R., Mendel, R.-R., Eds.; Plant Cell Monographs; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; Volume 17, pp. 55–74. ISBN 978-3-642-10612-5. [Google Scholar]
  203. Owuoche, J.O.; Briggs, K.G.; Taylor, G.J.; Penney, D.C. Response of Eight Canadian Spring Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) Cultivars to Copper: Copper Content in the Leaves and Grain. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1995, 75, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Kim, S.; Mollet, J.-C.; Dong, J.; Zhang, K.; Park, S.-Y.; Lord, E.M. Chemocyanin, a Small Basic Protein from the Lily Stigma, Induces Pollen Tube Chemotropism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 16125–16130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Sancenón, V.; Puig, S.; Mateu-Andrés, I.; Dorcey, E.; Thiele, D.J.; Peñarrubia, L. The Arabidopsis Copper Transporter COPT1 Functions in Root Elongation and Pollen Development. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 15348–15355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Jung, H.; Gayomba, S.R.; Rutzke, M.A.; Craft, E.; Kochian, L.V.; Vatamaniuk, O.K. COPT6 Is a Plasma Membrane Transporter That Functions in Copper Homeostasis in Arabidopsis and Is a Novel Target of SQUAMOSA Promoter-Binding Protein-like 7. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 33252–33267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Garcia-Molina, A.; Andrés-Colás, N.; Perea-García, A.; Neumann, U.; Dodani, S.C.; Huijser, P.; Peñarrubia, L.; Puig, S. The Arabidopsis COPT6 Transport Protein Functions in Copper Distribution Under Copper-Deficient Conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013, 54, 1378–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Bernal, M.; Casero, D.; Singh, V.; Wilson, G.T.; Grande, A.; Yang, H.; Dodani, S.C.; Pellegrini, M.; Huijser, P.; Connolly, E.L.; et al. Transcriptome Sequencing Identifies SPL7 -Regulated Copper Acquisition Genes FRO4 / FRO5 and the Copper Dependence of Iron Homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 738–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Yamasaki, H.; Hayashi, M.; Fukazawa, M.; Kobayashi, Y.; Shikanai, T. SQUAMOSA Promoter Binding Protein–Like7 Is a Central Regulator for Copper Homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 347–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Yamasaki, K.; Kigawa, T.; Inoue, M.; Tateno, M.; Yamasaki, T.; Yabuki, T.; Aoki, M.; Seki, E.; Matsuda, T.; Nunokawa, E.; et al. A Novel Zinc-Binding Motif Revealed by Solution Structures of DNA-Binding Domains of Arabidopsis SBP-Family Transcription Factors. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 337, 49–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Abdel-Ghany, S.E.; Pilon, M. MicroRNA-Mediated Systemic Down-Regulation of Copper Protein Expression in Response to Low Copper Availability in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 15932–15945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Yamasaki, H.; Abdel-Ghany, S.E.; Cohu, C.M.; Kobayashi, Y.; Shikanai, T.; Pilon, M. Regulation of Copper Homeostasis by Micro-RNA in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 16369–16378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Pilon, M.; Cohu, C.M.; Ravet, K.; Abdel-Ghany, S.E.; Gaymard, F. Essential Transition Metal Homeostasis in Plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Sunkar, R.; Kapoor, A.; Zhu, J.-K. Posttranscriptional Induction of Two Cu/Zn Superoxide Dismutase Genes in Arabidopsis Is Mediated by Downregulation of MiR398 and Important for Oxidative Stress Tolerance. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 2051–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Pilon, M. The Copper MicroRNAs. New Phytol. 2017, 213, 1030–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Schulten, A.; Pietzenuk, B.; Quintana, J.; Scholle, M.; Feil, R.; Krause, M.; Romera-Branchat, M.; Wahl, V.; Severing, E.; Coupland, G.; et al. Energy Status-Promoted Growth and Development of Arabidopsis Require Copper Deficiency Response Transcriptional Regulator SPL7. Plant Cell 2022, 34, 3873–3898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Wang, J.-W. Regulation of Flowering Time by the MiR156-Mediated Age Pathway. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 4723–4730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Teotia, S.; Tang, G. To Bloom or Not to Bloom: Role of MicroRNAs in Plant Flowering. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 359–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Rahmati Ishka, M.; Vatamaniuk, O.K. Copper Deficiency Alters Shoot Architecture and Reduces Fertility of Both Gynoecium and Androecium in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Direct 2020, 4, e00288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Jung, J.-H.; Seo, Y.-H.; Seo, P.J.; Reyes, J.L.; Yun, J.; Chua, N.-H.; Park, C.-M. The GIGANTEA -Regulated MicroRNA172 Mediates Photoperiodic Flowering Independent of CONSTANS in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 2736–2748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Zhu, Q.-H.; Helliwell, C.A. Regulation of Flowering Time and Floral Patterning by MiR172. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 487–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Mathieu, J.; Yant, L.J.; Mürdter, F.; Küttner, F.; Schmid, M. Repression of Flowering by the MiR172 Target SMZ. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7, e1000148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Aukerman, M.J.; Sakai, H. Regulation of Flowering Time and Floral Organ Identity by a MicroRNA and Its APETALA2 -Like Target Genes. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 2730–2741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Arteca, R.N.; Arteca, J.M. Heavy-Metal-Induced Ethylene Production in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Physiol. 2007, 164, 1480–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Achard, P.; Baghour, M.; Chapple, A.; Hedden, P.; Van Der Straeten, D.; Genschik, P.; Moritz, T.; Harberd, N.P. The Plant Stress Hormone Ethylene Controls Floral Transition via DELLA-Dependent Regulation of Floral Meristem-Identity Genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 6484–6489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Maric, A. Beyond the Genetics of Flowering: Integration of Ethylene Signaling and Histone Methylation Controls Flowering Time. Plant Physiol. 2023, 192, 2224–2226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Chen, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, H.; Chen, L.; Yu, D. ERF1 Delays Flowering through Direct Inhibition of FLOWERING LOCUS T Expression in Arabidopsis. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 1712–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Hirayama, T.; Kieber, J.J.; Hirayama, N.; Kogan, M.; Guzman, P.; Nourizadeh, S.; Alonso, J.M.; Dailey, W.P.; Dancis, A.; Ecker, J.R. RESPONSIVE-TO-ANTAGONIST1, a Menkes/Wilson Disease–Related Copper Transporter, Is Required for Ethylene Signaling in Arabidopsis. Cell 1999, 97, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Woeste, K.E.; Kieber, J.J. A Strong Loss-of-Function Mutation in RAN1 Results in Constitutive Activation of the Ethylene Response Pathway as Well as a Rosette-Lethal Phenotype. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 443–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Rodríguez, F.I.; Esch, J.J.; Hall, A.E.; Binder, B.M.; Schaller, G.E.; Bleecker, A.B. A Copper Cofactor for the Ethylene Receptor ETR1 from Arabidopsis. Science 1999, 283, 996–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Chen, Y.-F.; Randlett, M.D.; Findell, J.L.; Schaller, G.E. Localization of the Ethylene Receptor ETR1 to the Endoplasmic Reticulum of Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 19861–19866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Azhar, B.J.; Abbas, S.; Aman, S.; Yamburenko, M.V.; Chen, W.; Müller, L.; Uzun, B.; Jewell, D.A.; Dong, J.; Shakeel, S.N.; et al. Basis for High-Affinity Ethylene Binding by the Ethylene Receptor ETR1 of Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2215195120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Binder, B.M.; Rodríguez, F.I.; Bleecker, A.B. The Copper Transporter RAN1 Is Essential for Biogenesis of Ethylene Receptors in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 37263–37270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Himelblau, E.; Amasino, R.M. Nutrients Mobilized from Leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana during Leaf Senescence. J. Plant Physiol. 2001, 158, 1317–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Alejandro, S.; Höller, S.; Meier, B.; Peiter, E. Manganese in Plants: From Acquisition to Subcellular Allocation. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  236. Socha, A.L.; Guerinot, M.L. Mn-Euvering Manganese: The Role of Transporter Gene Family Members in Manganese Uptake and Mobilization in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Schmidt. Husted The Biochemical Properties of Manganese in Plants. Plants 2019, 8, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  238. Burnell, J.N. The Biochemistry of Manganese in Plants. In Manganese in Soils and Plants: Proceedings; Graham, R.D., Hannam, R.J., Uren, N.C., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1988; pp. 125–137. ISBN 978-94-009-2817-6. [Google Scholar]
  239. Schmidt, S.B.; Jensen, P.E.; Husted, S. Manganese Deficiency in Plants: The Impact on Photosystem II. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 622–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. Bannister, J.V.; Bannister, W.H.; Rotilio, G. Aspects of the Structure, Function, and Applications of Superoxide Dismutas. Crit. Rev. Biochem. 1987, 22, 111–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  241. Requena, L.; Bornemann, S. Barley (Hordeum Vulgare) Oxalate Oxidase Is a Manganese-Containing Enzyme. Biochem. J. 1999, 343, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Lane, B.G. Oxalate, Germins, and Higher-Plant Pathogens. IUBMB Life 2002, 53, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Sharma, C.P.; Sharma, P.N.; Chatterjee, C.; Agarwala, S.C. Manganese Deficiency in Maize Affects Pollen Viability. Plant Soil 1991, 138, 139–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Yang, C.-H.; Wang, C.; Singh, S.; Fan, N.; Liu, S.; Zhao, L.; Cao, H.; Xie, W.; Yang, C.; Huang, C.-F. Golgi-Localised Manganese Transporter PML3 Regulates Arabidopsis Growth through Modulating Golgi Glycosylation and Cell Wall Biosynthesis. New Phytol. 2021, 231, 2200–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Zhang, B.; Zhang, C.; Liu, C.; Fu, A.; Luan, S. A Golgi-Localized Manganese Transporter Functions in Pollen Tube Tip Growth to Control Male Fertility in Arabidopsis. Plant Commun. 2021, 2, 100178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. He, J.; Rössner, N.; Hoang, M.T.T.; Alejandro, S.; Peiter, E. Transport, Functions, and Interaction of Calcium and Manganese in Plant Organellar Compartments. Plant Physiol. 2021, 187, 1940–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Kosuth, T.; Leskova, A.; Castaings, L.; Curie, C. Golgi in and out: Multifaceted Role and Journey of Manganese. New Phytol. 2023, 238, 1795–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Zeng, W.; Chatterjee, M.; Faik, A. UDP-Xylose-Stimulated Glucuronyltransferase Activity in Wheat Microsomal Membranes: Characterization and Role in Glucurono(Arabino)Xylan Biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 78–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  249. Wang, B.; Jin, S.; Hu, H.; Sun, Y.; Wang, Y.; Han, P.; Hou, B. UGT87A2, an Arabidopsis Glycosyltransferase, Regulates Flowering Time via FLOWERING LOCUS C. New Phytol. 2012, 194, 666–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  250. Luk, E.; Carroll, M.; Baker, M.; Culotta, V.C. Manganese Activation of Superoxide Dismutase 2 in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Requires MTM1, a Member of the Mitochondrial Carrier Family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 10353–10357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  251. Su, Z.; Chai, M.-F.; Lu, P.-L.; An, R.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.-C. AtMTM1, a Novel Mitochondrial Protein, May Be Involved in Activation of the Manganese-Containing Superoxide Dismutase in Arabidopsis. Planta 2007, 226, 1031–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  252. Hu, S.-H.; Lin, S.-F.; Huang, Y.-C.; Huang, C.-H.; Kuo, W.-Y.; Jinn, T.-L. Significance of AtMTM1 and AtMTM2 for Mitochondrial MnSOD Activation in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 690064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  253. Schwarz, G.; Mendel, R.R. Molybdenum Cofactor Biosynthesis and Molybdenum Enzymes. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 623–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Hille, R.; Nishino, T.; Bittner, F. Molybdenum Enzymes in Higher Organisms. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255, 1179–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Hänsch, R.; Lang, C.; Rennenberg, H.; Mendel, R.R. Significance of Plant Sulfite Oxidase. Plant Biol. 2007, 9, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Yesbergenova, Z.; Yang, G.; Oron, E.; Soffer, D.; Fluhr, R.; Sagi, M. The Plant Mo-Hydroxylases Aldehyde Oxidase and Xanthine Dehydrogenase Have Distinct Reactive Oxygen Species Signatures and Are Induced by Drought and Abscisic Acid. Plant J. 2005, 42, 862–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  257. Wu, J.; Kamanga, B.M.; Zhang, W.; Xu, Y.; Xu, L. Research Progress of Aldehyde Oxidases in Plants. PeerJ 2022, 10, e13119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  258. Campbell, W.H. Nitrate reductase structure, function and regulation: Bridging the gap between biochemistry and physiology. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1999, 50, 277–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  259. Tejada-Jimenez, M.; Chamizo-Ampudia, A.; Calatrava, V.; Galvan, A.; Fernandez, E.; Llamas, A. From the Eukaryotic Molybdenum Cofactor Biosynthesis to the Moonlighting Enzyme MARC. Molecules 2018, 23, 3287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  260. Kaiser, B.N.; Gridley, K.L.; Ngaire Brady, J.; Phillips, T.; Tyerman, S.D. The Role of Molybdenum in Agricultural Plant Production. Ann. Bot. 2005, 96, 745–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  261. Mayr, S.J.; Mendel, R.-R.; Schwarz, G. Molybdenum Cofactor Biology, Evolution and Deficiency. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Mol. Cell Res. 2021, 1868, 118883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  262. Mendel, R.R. The History of the Molybdenum Cofactor—A Personal View. Molecules 2022, 27, 4934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Tanaka, O.; Horikawa, W.; Nishimura, H.; Nasu, Y. Flower Induction by Suppression of Nitrate Assimilation in Lemna paucicostata 6746. Plant Cell Physiol. 1986, 27, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Nelson-Schreiber, B.M.; Schweitzer, L.E. Limitations on Leaf Nitrate Reductase Activity during Flowering and Podfill in Soybean. Plant Physiol. 1986, 80, 454–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Maia, L.B.; Moura, J.J.G. Nitrite Reduction by Molybdoenzymes: A New Class of Nitric Oxide-Forming Nitrite Reductases. JBIC J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 20, 403–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Olas, J.J.; Van Dingenen, J.; Abel, C.; Działo, M.A.; Feil, R.; Krapp, A.; Schlereth, A.; Wahl, V. Nitrate Acts at the Arabidopsis thaliana Shoot Apical Meristem to Regulate Flowering Time. New Phytol. 2019, 223, 814–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  267. Marchive, C.; Roudier, F.; Castaings, L.; Bréhaut, V.; Blondet, E.; Colot, V.; Meyer, C.; Krapp, A. Nuclear Retention of the Transcription Factor NLP7 Orchestrates the Early Response to Nitrate in Plants. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  268. He, Y.; Tang, R.-H.; Hao, Y.; Stevens, R.D.; Cook, C.W.; Ahn, S.M.; Jing, L.; Yang, Z.; Chen, L.; Guo, F.; et al. Nitric Oxide Represses the Arabidopsis Floral Transition. Science 2004, 305, 1968–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  269. Zhang, Z.-W.; Fu, Y.-F.; Zhou, Y.-H.; Wang, C.-Q.; Lan, T.; Chen, G.-D.; Zeng, J.; Chen, Y.-E.; Yuan, M.; Yuan, S.; et al. Nitrogen and Nitric Oxide Regulate Arabidopsis Flowering Differently. Plant Sci. 2019, 284, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  270. Seligman, K.; Saviani, E.E.; Oliveira, H.C.; Pinto-Maglio, C.A.F.; Salgado, I. Floral Transition and Nitric Oxide Emission During Flower Development in Arabidopsis thaliana Is Affected in Nitrate Reductase-Deficient Plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49, 1112–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  271. Planchet, E.; Jagadis Gupta, K.; Sonoda, M.; Kaiser, W.M. Nitric Oxide Emission from Tobacco Leaves and Cell Suspensions: Rate Limiting Factors and Evidence for the Involvement of Mitochondrial Electron Transport: NO Production by Plants. Plant J. 2005, 41, 732–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. A summary of transcription factors and enzymes relying on micronutrients as cofactors for their functional activation or catalytic activity enhancement.
Table 1. A summary of transcription factors and enzymes relying on micronutrients as cofactors for their functional activation or catalytic activity enhancement.
PlantGene NameProtein FunctionElementEffectDescriptionReference
ArabidopsisCML24Calmodulin-like proteinCalciumPromotioncml24 mutant delays flowering in LD with high expression of CO.[34,35]
ArabidopsisCML23 and CML24Calmodulin-like proteinCalciumPromotioncml23 cml24 double mutant delays flowering in LD through increased FLC.[34,35]
ArabidopsisCPK32KinaseCalciumPromotioncpk32 exhibits delayed and late flowering. CPK32 protein interacts with FCA and phosphorylates it in a Ca2+-dependent manner. [38]
ArabidopsisCBK3/CRK1KinaseCalciumPromotionCKB3-overexpression transgenic line exhibits early flowering in both LD and SD with shorter periods of circadian rhythm of CCA1 and LHY. [42,43]
ArabidopsisNCLNa+/Ca2+ exchangerCalciumInhibitionNCL overexpressing transgenic plants delays flowering with less expression of CO and FT, and atncl-1 mutant flowers earlier in LD, not SD, due to high expression of CO and FT.[44]
ArabidopsisCAX1Vacuolar H+/Ca2+ transporterCalciumPromotioncax1 displays late flowering.[45]
ArabidopsisALBINO3/PPF1Chloroplast-localizing calcium ion transporterCalciumInhibitionPPF1 overexpressing plants flower late, while PPF1 antisense transgenic plants flower earlier.[46,47]
SoybeanGmCDPK38KinaseCalciumPromotiongmcdpk38 mutant flowers later and alters the expression of several flowering genes.[39]
TobaccoNtCBK1KinaseCalciumInhibitionTransgenic tobacco overexpressing NtCBK1 exhibits late flowering.[40]
ArabidopsisGSH1Gamma-glutamyl cysteine synthaseSulfurInhibitionGSH1 overexpressing transgenic plants exhibit delayed flowering due to high levels of FLC and low FT expression, while pad2-1, a GSH1 mutant allele, flowers earlier than wild-type.[85]
ArabidopsisFRY13’(2’),5’-bisphosphate nucleotidaseSulfurPromotionfry1 mutant flowers late due to reduced FT expression.[78]
ArabidopsisFILZnF TFZincInhibitionfil mutant shows early flowering.[123,124]
ArabidopsisLATEZnF TFZincInhibitionLATE ectopic expression results in late flowering.[135]
ArabidopsisAtVOZ1 and AtVOZ2ZnF TFZincPromotionvoz1voz2 double mutant exhibits severely delayed flowering due to increased FLC transcription level.[127]
RiceFLZ2ZnF TFZincInhibitionFLZ2 overexpressing plants display late flowering, and flz2 mutant exhibits early flowering, showing alterations in floral integrator gene expression.[141]
AlfalfaMsZFNPutative znf TFZincInhibitionMsZFN overexpression in Arabidopsis causes late flowering under LD.[130]
MaizeID1Transcription factor, IDD familyZincPromotionid mutant exhibits late flowering.[142]
ArabidopsisCOZnF TF, BBX familyZincPromotionco mutant exhibits late flowering.[158]
ArabidopsisCOL3/BBX4ZnF TF, BBX familyZincInhibitioncol3 exhibits early flowering with increased FT expression. COL3/BBX4 interacts with BBX32.[162]
ArabidopsisCOL5/BBX6ZnF TF, BBX familyZincPromotionOverexpression of COL5/BBX6 promotes flowering.[159]
ArabidopsisCOL9/BBX7ZnF TF, BBX familyZincInhibitionCOL9 overexpressing plants display delayed flowering, while suppression of COL9 flowers earlier.[160]
ArabidopsisEIP6/BBX32ZnF TF, BBX familyZincInhibitioneip6/bbx32 mutant displays early flowering, while overexpressing plants exhibit late flowering.[161]
RiceHD1ZnF TF, BBX familyZincPromotionhd1 exhibits late flowering.[163]
RiceOsCOL3ZnF TF, BBX familyZincInhibitionOsCOL3 overexpression causes late flowering through decrease in FTL expression.[164]
ChrysanthemumBBX24ZnF TF, BBX familyZincInhibitionSuppression of BBX24 causes early flowering via photoperiod and GA biosynthesis pathways.[165]
ArabidopsisJMJ11/ELF6Histone methyltransferase, znf and jmjcZinc, ironInhibitionelf6 mutant is early flowering due to the downregulation of FLC and sequential upregulation of FT.[146,147]
ArabidopsisJMJ12/REF6Histone methyltransferase, znf and jmjcZinc, ironPromotionref6 mutant is late flowering because of high FLC expression. And REF6 /JMJ12 associates with SOC1 locus to promote SOC1 expression in LD.[146,148]
ArabidopsisJMJ13Histone methyltransferase, znf and jmjcZinc, ironInhibitionjmj13 mutant is early flowering both in LD and SD.[149]
ArabidopsisJMJ14Histone methyltransferase, znf and jmjcZinc, ironInhibitionjmj14 mutant shows increase in FT, SOC1, AP1, and LFY expression and early flowering. JMJ14 interacts with EMF1, a component of a polycomb group complex, and suppresses FT transcription and flowering.[151,152,154]
ArabidopsisJMJ15Histone methyltransferase, znf and jmjcZinc, ironPromotionJMJ15 overexpression results in early flowering and repression of FLC level and reduced H3K4me3 at the FLC locus, resulting in increased FT expression.[157]
ArabidopsisJMJ18Histone methyltransferase, znf and jmjcZinc, ironPromotionJMJ18 overexpression results in early flowering and repression of FLC level and reduced H3K4me3 at the FLC locus, resulting in increased FT expression.[156]
ArabidopsisJMJ27Histone methyltransferase, jmjc domainIronInhibitionjmj27 mutant displays an increase in CO, FT, and SOC1 expression and a decrease in FLC expression, resulting in early flowering.[172]
ArabidopsisJMJ30 and JMJ32Histone methyltransferase, jmjc domainIronInhibitionjmj30 jmj32 shows early flowering under vernalized conditions with a high accumulation level of H3K27me3 and less FLC transcription.[168,169]
ArabidopsisbHLH38, bHLH100, and bHLH101bHLH transcription factorsIronInhibitionbhlh38 bhlh100 bhlh101 triple mutant shows early flowering.[181]
ArabidopsisMMS19A component of Fe-S clusterIron, sulfurInhibitionmms19 mutant shows reduced Fe contents and early flowering.[185]
ArabidopsisBRMChromatin-remodeling atpase with bromodomainBoronInhibitionThe protein accumulation of BRAHMA is reduced through proteasomal degradation. BRM-silenced and loss-of-function mutation in BRM exhibits early flowering under both long days and short days.[98,99,100]
ArabidopsisSPL7SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING and transcription factorCopperPromotionspl7-1 mutant exhibits lightly delayed flowering both in Cu-deficient medium and normal conditions, probably due to high accumulation of miRNA156.[216]
ArabidopsisMTM1 and MTM2MnSOD1 activatorManganeseInhibitionmtm1 mtm2 double mutant flowers earlier than wild-type and single mutants.[252]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jun, S.E.; Shim, J.S.; Park, H.J. Beyond NPK: Mineral Nutrient-Mediated Modulation in Orchestrating Flowering Time. Plants 2023, 12, 3299. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12183299

AMA Style

Jun SE, Shim JS, Park HJ. Beyond NPK: Mineral Nutrient-Mediated Modulation in Orchestrating Flowering Time. Plants. 2023; 12(18):3299. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12183299

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jun, Sang Eun, Jae Sun Shim, and Hee Jin Park. 2023. "Beyond NPK: Mineral Nutrient-Mediated Modulation in Orchestrating Flowering Time" Plants 12, no. 18: 3299. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12183299

APA Style

Jun, S. E., Shim, J. S., & Park, H. J. (2023). Beyond NPK: Mineral Nutrient-Mediated Modulation in Orchestrating Flowering Time. Plants, 12(18), 3299. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12183299

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop