Next Article in Journal
Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Key Genes and Pathways Associated with the Regulation of Flowering Time in Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata)
Next Article in Special Issue
Novel Mechanisms Underlying Rubber Accumulation and Programmed Cell Death in Laticiferous Canals of Decaisnea insignis Fruits: Cytological and Transcriptomic Analyses
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Net Primary Productivity Variation and Quantitative Assessment of Driving Forces—A Case Study of the Yangtze River Basin
Previous Article in Special Issue
First Report of Colleters in Araceae: A Case Study in Anthurium andraeanum Reveals Diverse Mucilage Glands Associated with the Developing Shoot
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 19
10.3390/plants12193411
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Inaugural Description of Extrafloral Nectaries in Sapindaceae: Structure, Diversity and Nectar Composition

by
Danielle Maximo
,
Marcelo J. P. Ferreira
and
Diego Demarco
*
Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-090, SP, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(19), 3411; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12193411
Submission received: 7 September 2023 / Revised: 23 September 2023 / Accepted: 25 September 2023 / Published: 28 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Decoding the Secretory Structure in Plants: From Biology to Interaction Networks)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Sapindales is a large order with a great diversity of nectaries; however, to date, there is no information about extrafloral nectaries (EFN) in Sapindaceae, except recent topological and morphological data, which indicate an unexpected structural novelty for the family. Therefore, the goal of this study was to describe the EFN in Sapindaceae for the first time and to investigate its structure and nectar composition. Shoots and young leaves of Urvillea ulmacea were fixed for structural analyses of the nectaries using light and scanning electron microscopy. For nectar composition investigation, GC-MS and HPLC were used, in addition to histochemical tests. Nectaries of Urvillea are circular and sunken, corresponding to ocelli. They are composed of a multiple-secretory epidermis located on a layer of transfer cells, vascularized by phloem and xylem. Nectar is composed of sucrose, fructose, xylitol and glucose, in addition to amino acids, lipids and phenolic compounds. Many ants were observed gathering nectar from young leaves. These EFNs have an unprecedented structure in the family and also differ from the floral nectaries of Sapindaceae, which are composed of secretory parenchyma and release nectar through stomata. The ants observed seem to protect the plant against herbivores, and in this way, the nectar increases the defence of vegetative organs synergistically with latex.

1. Introduction

A nectary is a gland that secretes nectar, a secretion mainly composed of sugars [1]. The fact that the concept of nectary is functional implies a great morphological diversity. Nectaries can be trichomes, epidermal surfaces, as well as glands composed of nectariferous and subnectariferous tissues, which can be vascularized or not [1,2].
The type of nectary found in a given clade is directly related to the morphological evolution of secretory structures of this group and their ecological relationships. This fact can be especially noted in Sapindales, a morphologically multidiverse order that shows an unusual diversification of their glands [3].
Different types of nectaries have already been reported for Sapindales, an uncommon diversity for the same order. Moreover, extrafloral nectaries have been recorded only in Neotropical lineages, i.e., Anacardiaceae, Burseraceae, Sapindaceae, Simaroubaceae, Meliaceae and Rutaceae [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12], and data on their anatomical structures are rare, creating a huge gap of knowledge, especially for nectaries of Sapindaceae.
Despite the large number of species in this family and the morphological studies of its representatives, the first report of extrafloral nectaries in Sapindaceae has only occurred recently in Paullinia, Serjania and Urvillea [3], and there is no structural information about them. Extrafloral nectaries vary in shape and size in the different families of Sapindales and could be trichomes, stalked glands or ocelli located on leaves, cataphylls, bracts, inflorescence axis and fruits [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].
Despite the morphological and ontogenetic variation, all nectaries recorded in Sapindales are composed of nectariferous parenchyma, vascularized by xylem and phloem, and release nectar through stomata occurring in a non-secretory epidermis [3,12,13]. Although nectaries of Sapindaceae would supposedly have a similar tissue composition [3], there is no anatomical information to date.
Previous personal field observations indicate a relationship between the nectar produced by these nectaries and the attraction of a large number of ants that patrol the young branches, as reported by Villatoro-Moreno et al. [14] in a largely well-known mutualistic relationship [15,16,17,18,19]. Although nectar is composed basically of water and sugar, other minor components may occur in this secretion, such as amino acids and proteins, lipids, and even phenolic compounds and alkaloids [1,20,21,22]. There is no information about nectar composition in Sapindaceae. The analysis of secretion composition is fundamental to correctly classify a gland and perform ecological inferences [23].
Due to the scarcity of information about the extrafloral nectaries in Sapindaceae and their likely distinct constitution from all other nectaries of Sapindales, the goal of this study was to analyse the structure of extrafloral nectaries and the main chemical classes of metabolites in Urvillea nectar to better understand their morphological, anatomical and functional diversity in Sapindaceae.

2. Results

2.1. Morphology

The leaves of Urvillea ulmacea are trifoliolate with leaflets exhibiting a dentate margin (Figure 1A) and nectaries in the tooth apex (Figure 1B). These nectaries are inconspicuous, forming a small submarginal rounded bulge on the abaxial surface of the leaflets (Figure 2A), where the nectariferous tissue is found slightly sunken, corresponding to an ocellus (Figure 2B). This secretory epidermis is formed of cells with an irregular pattern of organization, covered by a smooth cuticle, and there are no stomata (Figure 2C,D).

2.2. Anatomy

Anatomically, Urvillea nectaries are comprised of a multiseriate secretory epidermis (Figure 3A) covered by a thin cuticle, with three to six layers of cells located on a layer of transfer cells (Figure 3B). The secretory cells are isodiametric and have thin, pecto-cellulosic walls, dense cytoplasm with several vacuoles full of secretion (Figure 3C), and a prominent nucleus with evident nucleolus. These cells are juxtaposed and irregularly grouped since the beginning of their ontogeny (Figure 3D). However, these cells split, forming deep slits in the secretory tissue during the secretory phase (Figure 3B,E), indicating a likely relation to the release of nectar, which reaches the nectary surface without rupture of the cuticle (Figure 2D or Figure 3C). The transfer cells, beneath the secretory epidermis, have thick, primary (Figure 3C,F) and suberized anticlinal walls (Figure 4A,B) and a single central vacuole containing phenolic compounds (Figure 3C).
The nectaries are vascularized by ramifications of the vascular bundles of the leaf tooth (Figure 3A,B), composed mainly of phloem (Figure 3E) but also containing xylem vessels (Figure 3F). The vascular terminations expand beneath the transfer layer throughout the nectary extension. The leaf mesophyll underlying the nectaries has a large amount of laticifers, phenolic (Figure 3A,B) and crystalliferous idioblasts (Figure 3F) containing druses in a similar distribution to the rest of the leaf.

2.3. Nectar

The histochemical analysis detected the presence of carbohydrates (sugars), proteins and/or amino acids and phenolic compounds in the nectar (Figure 4C–F and Table 1). No starch storage was found in the nectariferous or subnectariferous tissue. Lipids are present in the nectar but were not histochemically detected (Table 1) due to their very low concentration (Figure 5 and Table 2).
The chemical analysis revealed the nectar is mainly composed of sucrose, fructose, xylitol and glucose, in addition to some minor components, such as amino acids, lipids (Figure 5 and Table 2) and phenolic compounds (Figure 6 and Figure 7). Comparing the phenolic derivatives of nectaries and leaves, four flavones were found exclusively in the nectaries of Urvillea ulmacea (Figure 6 and Figure 7; compounds 1–3 and 6).
After the release of nectar on the surface of the nectary, it is gathered by a large number of ants that forage the plant. Although nectar droplets have been rarely observed, the ants collect the secretion without damaging the nectary. During field collection of the plants, several leaves were analysed, and no wounds were observed.

3. Discussion

In this study, we unravelled the structure of extrafloral nectaries in Sapindaceae, revealing an unexpected gland formed by multiple epidermis, subtended by a layer of transfer cells, which has no parallel in Sapindales. Despite the large number of ants foraging leaves and shoots of several species of Sapindaceae (pers. obs.), the first reports of leaf nectaries in the family are recent [3,14], probably due to its greatly reduced size.
Extrafloral nectaries vary in position within Sapindaceae. They have been noted on the teeth of leaflet margin in Paullinia seminuda Radlk. [3], as observed in this study for Urvillea ulmacea. However, the nectaries were found at the leaflet apex in Paullinia carpopoda Cambess. [3] and in the apical region or along the midrib in Nephelium lappaceum L. [14]. The morphology of these nectaries also varies in the family. They are sunken ocelli in Urvillea, elevated ocelli in Nephelium [14] and stalked glands in Paullinia [3].
The structure of the extrafloral nectaries is highly diverse in Sapindales, but the histological composition described for those of Urvillea represents a novelty for the order. In Anacardiaceae, they are trichomatous, found clustered in depressions on the leaf surface and often confused with domatia [5,8]. In Meliaceae and Rutaceae, nectaries are ocelli formed by nectariferous epidermis and parenchyma [4,6,7,9,10,11]. Although Simaroubaceae also has ocelli on the surface of the leaf blade, nectaries formed only by secretory parenchyma, which release nectar through stomata, were recently observed at the apex of Homalolepis and Simaba leaflets [3,12].
Unlike the other families, Burseraceae and some Simaroubaceae have stalked nectaries, generally occurring on the leaves (petiole, blade and/or stipule) and cataphylls [13,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. They are elongated, vascularized emergences, usually located on the margin of leaflets [12,31] but vary in Ailanthus, where they are found on the petiole (or stipule), lamina and margin of the cataphylls [13].
Although the nectaries of Urvillea stand out for being formed of a multiple epidermis with irregular cell arrangement, the irregularity in the organization of epidermal secretory cells is common in Sapindales. Glandular trichomes of Sapindaceae, Meliaceae and Simaroubaceae are characterized by the irregular arrangement of their secretory cells [3,12], which seems to be the pattern of cell organization in the members of these families, denoting an unusual activity of the protoderm during the ontogenesis of these glands. Furthermore, we observed that secretory cells, grouped in distinct clusters, split during secretory activity. These slits formed during nectary differentiation indicate that the nectar may be released laterally to the inner cells of the secretory tissue, similar to that observed in some colleters [32,33,34,35]. In Plumeria (Apocynaceae), the separation of the epidermal cells is due to the dissolution of the middle lamella [32]. More studies are needed to verify the mode of secretion release in nectaries in Sapindaceae and the formation of these slits.
The multiple secretory epidermis of Urvillea are situated on a layer of transfer cells. Despite the large number of cells that form these nectaries, the presence of a layer of transfer cells under the secretory portion is similar to that reported for nectariferous trichomes of Adenocalymma (Bignoniaceae) [36]. This transfer layer is associated with the short-distance transport of solutes via the transmembrane. Apparently, transfer cells occur when the area for transport is much smaller than the volume of the destination structure and the transported solute is accompanied by minimal solvent flux [37,38]. In Adenocalymma nectaries, cell wall invaginations are also located in anticlinal regions, and a large number of mitochondria are associated with the polarized cell transport of solute [36].
The absence of stomata in the nectaries of Urvillea is also an unusual feature for the order, except for the trichomatous ones [3]. The release of nectar directly through the wall and cuticle would not be expected even for the family since the floral nectaries of Sapindaceae are formed of secretory parenchyma that release the nectar through stomata [3,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49].
The nectar of Urvillea is composed of sugars, amino acids, lipids and phenolic compounds. Sucrose, fructose and glucose are the main components of the nectar of most plants [1] and are among the major compounds of the nectar in Urvillea. However, a fourth sugar was found in large amounts—xylitol. The occurrence of this sugar in the nectar is unexpected since xylitol is not commonly produced by plants. Its presence may be related to the growth inhibition of bacteria provided by xylitol [50]. Further studies are necessary to investigate the production and functions of this sugar in nectar.
Phenolic compounds, commonly found in the nectar, also have antimicrobial activity [1,51]. The phenolics detected in this study were identified as flavones, which have these properties [52,53,54]. The presence of these compounds is very important in secretions composed basically of water and carbohydrates [55] to avoid proliferation of microorganisms that may cause necrosis of the nectariferous tissues. Additionally, flavonoids provide photoprotection to the secretion, preventing the oxidation of compounds. Therefore, the occurrence of flavonoids in the nectar of Urvillea may prolong the secretory activity of the leaf nectaries.
The second major class of compounds in nectar is amino acids, which account for about 14% in Urvillea. This high concentration of amino acids in the nectar is unusual. In general, amino acids are 100–1000 times less concentrated than sugars in nectar. However, a higher concentration of amino acids has a greater potential to attract ants since it influences the taste of nectar, increasing its attractiveness and its nutritional importance, especially for animals whose only food resource is nectar [56,57,58,59]. Perhaps the high concentration of amino acids in the nectar of Urvillea is one of the factors responsible for the large number of ants observed continuously foraging the plants. Although the formation of droplets on the surface of the nectary is rarely observed, it is likely stored in the slits of the epidermis, where the nectar is collected, especially in young leaves.
Extrafloral nectaries have a well-known mutualistic relationship with ants that protects the plant against herbivores [15,17,19,60], and this interaction in Sapindaceae has been studied by Villatoro-Moreno et al. [14], who reported 10 species from five subfamilies of ants visiting the nectaries of Nephelium lappaceum. The ants were observed continuously foraging Urvillea ulmacea in the field, effectively protecting the plant. This protection associated with the occurrence of laticifers and phenolic idioblasts [61] inhibits herbivory; no wounds were observed in the leaves.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material

Shoots of Urvillea ulmacea Kunth were collected from the Forest Reserve of the Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira (CUASO) in São Paulo (Brazil) and the voucher was deposited in the Herbarium SPF (Maximo, D. 1). This species was selected based on previous observations that identified nectaries occurring on the margins of its leaflets [3].

4.2. Structural Analyses

Shoot apices and young leaves were fixed in formalin–acetic acid–alcohol (FAA) solution for 24 h [62] and buffered neutral formalin in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) for 48 h [63]. For the micromorphological study, mature nectaries were isolated, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, dried by the critical point method, mounted on aluminium stub, and sputter-coated with gold, with subsequent observation in a Zeiss Sigma VP scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
For anatomical analyses, shoot apices and young leaves were isolated, dehydrated through a tertiary butyl alcohol series [62], embedded in Paraplast® (Leica Microsystems Inc., Heidelberg, Germany), and serial-sectioned at a 12 µm thickness on a Leica RM2145 rotary microtome. Longitudinal and transverse sections were stained with astra blue and safranin O [64] and the slides were mounted with resin Permount (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Observations and photographs were performed using a Leica DMLB light microscope.

4.3. Nectar Composition

4.3.1. Histochemical Tests

The main chemical classes of the constituents of nectar were investigated using the following histochemical tests in the embedded nectaries: periodic acid–Schiff’s (PAS) reaction for carbohydrates [65], ruthenium red for acidic mucilage [66], tannic acid and ferric chloride for mucilage [67], Lugol’s reagent for starch [62], aniline blue black for proteins [68], Sudan black B and Sudan IV for lipids [69], Nile blue for acidic and neutral lipids [70], copper acetate and rubeanic acid for fatty acids [71,72], ferric chloride and fixation in ferrous sulphate–formalin for phenolic compounds [62], and Dragendorff’s [73] and Wagner’s [74] reagents for alkaloids. Standard control procedures were carried out according to Demarco [23]. The autofluorescence of the secretion and suberized walls were also analysed under UV and blue light. All observations and photographs were performed using a Leica DMLB light microscope equipped with an HBO 100 W mercury vapor lamp and a blue light filter block (excitation filter BP 420–490, dichromatic mirror RKP 510, suppression filter LP 515) and UV filter block (excitation filter BP340-380, dichromatic mirror RKP400, suppression filter LP425).

4.3.2. Derivatization of the Sample and Identification of Compounds through GC-MS

The extrafloral nectaries of Urvillea were derivatized using methoxyamine hydrochloride dissolved in pyridine (28 μL, CAS 593-56-6, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 2 h at 37 °C and N-Methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide (48 μL, MSTFA, CAS 24589-78-4, Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min at 37 °C [75]. The metabolites were analysed by GC-MS equipped with the HP-5MS column (Agilent, length 30 m, ID 250 μm, 0.25 μm film thickness, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The initial column temperature was adjusted to 70 °C for 5 min and ramped at 5 °C min−1 to a final temperature of 320 °C, which was maintained for 8 min with a total run time of 58 min. The injection volume was 1 μL in splitless mode with helium as a carrier gas at 1 mL min−1. The injector, ion source, and quadrupole temperatures were 300 °C, 200 °C, and 280 °C, respectively. MS detection was performed with electron ionization (EI) at 70 eV, working in the full-scan acquisition mode ranging between 50–800 m/z at 2.66 scan s−1.
Compound identification was made by comparison of mass fragmentation using NIST digital library spectra (v2.0, 2008) employing comparison values of Match e R-Match above 900 as well as by retention time and mass fragmentation pattern of commercial standards.

4.3.3. Crude Extracts Preparation and HPLC-DAD Analysis of Methanol Extracts

For phenolic extraction, fresh fragments of leaves and nectaries were extracted with 1 mL of HPLC-grade methanol for 15 min in an ultrasonic bath at room temperature followed by the collection of the supernatants by centrifugation (13000× g, 4 min, 25 °C). The obtained solutions were filtered using a 0.45 µm syringe filter.
Phenolic compounds were analysed using HPLC-DAD (model: 1260 system, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with an autosampler, using a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 column (150 × 4.6 mm, 3.5 µm particle diameter) at 45 °C with a flow rate of 1 mL·min−1, and an injection volume of 3 μL. The detection wavelengths were registered at 254, 280, and 352 nm. The chromatographic method was constituted by a gradient of mixtures of solvents A (water acidified with 0.1% acetic acid) and B (acetonitrile) of 0–6 min: 10%B; 6–7 min: 10–15%B; 7–22 min: 15%B; 22–23 min: 15–20%B; 23–33 min: 20%B; 33–34 min: 20–25%B; 34–44 min: 25%B; 44–54 min: 25–50%B; 54–60 min: 50–100%B.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we described the structure of extrafloral nectaries in Sapindaceae for the first time. Urvillea ulmacea have nectaries of the ocelli type composed of multiple secretory epidermises positioned on a layer of transfer cells, vascularized by phloem and xylem. This nectary stands out due to an irregular arrangement of the secretory cells that split, forming deep slits where the nectar is temporarily stored. Nectar is mainly composed of sucrose, fructose, xylitol and glucose, in addition to amino acids and other minor compounds, such as lipids and phenolics. After the release of nectar onto the gland surface, it is gathered by many ants, which continuously forage the plant. This novel description reveals a new type of nectary that differs structurally from all others of Sapindales and display a high concentration of amino acids, which can be related to a more effective attraction of ants. The redundancy in defensive secretory systems of Urvillea may be related to the low predation rate of its leaves, which contain extrafloral nectaries, laticifers and phenolic idioblasts. Further studies of nectaries of Sapindaceae are needed to verify whether the peculiar characteristics observed in this study are typical of the genus or family.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: D.M. and D.D.; Data curation: D.M., M.J.P.F. and D.D.; Funding acquisition: D.M. and D.D.; Investigation: D.M., M.J.P.F. and D.D.; Methodology: D.M., M.J.P.F. and D.D.; Resources: M.J.P.F. and D.D.; Supervision: D.D.; Validation: D.M., M.J.P.F. and D.D.; Visualization: D.M., M.J.P.F. and D.D.; Writing—original draft: D.M., M.J.P.F. and D.D.; Writing—review and editing: D.M., M.J.P.F. and D.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP; proc. #22/06272-1 and #20/16554-9).

Data Availability Statement

All figures and tables of this manuscript have been unpublished and were made specifically for this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank FAPESP for financial support and José R. Pirani (Universidade de São Paulo) for his help with the identification of the plant.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nicolson, S.W.; Nepi, M.; Pacini, E. Nectaries and Nectar; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fahn, A. Secretory Tissues in Plants; Academic Press: London, UK, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tölke, E.D.; Medina, M.C.; Souto, A.L.; Marques, J.P.R.; Alves, G.G.N.; Gama, R.L.; Pirani, J.R.; Demarco, D. Diversity and evolution of secretory structures in Sapindales. Braz. J. Bot. 2022, 45, 251–279. [Google Scholar]
  4. Morellato, L.P.C.; Oliveira, O.S. Extrafloral nectaries in the tropical tree Guarea macrophylla (Meliaceae). Can. J. Bot. 1994, 72, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rickson, F.R.; Rickson, M.M. The cashew nut, Anacardium occidentale (Anacardiaceae), and its perennial association with ants: Extrafloral nectary location and the potential for ant defense. Am. J. Bot. 1998, 85, 835–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Paiva, E.A.S.; Buono, R.A.; Delgado, M.N. Distribution and structural aspects of extrafloral nectaries in Cedrela fissilis (Meliaceae). Flora 2007, 202, 455–461. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kenfak, D.; Tindo, M.; Gueye, M. Extranuptial nectaries in Carapa Aubl. (Meliaceae-Cedreloideae). Adansonia 2014, 36, 335–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lacchia, A.P.S.; Tölke, E.D.; Demarco, D.; Carmello-Guerreiro, S.M. Presumed domatia are actually extrafloral nectaries on leaves of Anacardium humile (Anacardiaceae). Rodriguésia 2016, 67, 19–28. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tilney, P.M.; Nel, M.; van Wyk, A.E. Foliar secretory structures in Melia azedarach (Meliaceae), a widely cultivated and often invasive tree. N. Z. J. Bot. 2018, 56, 198–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tilney, P.M.; Nel, M.; van Wyk, A.E. Foliar secretory structures in Ekebergia capensis (Meliaceae). Helyion 2018, 4, e00541. [Google Scholar]
  11. Andrade, C.R.B.; Martins, F.M.; Brandão, H.N.; Alves, C.K.; Freitas-Silva, L. Leaf anatomy and histochemistry of secretory structures of Zanthoxylum caribaeum Lam. (Rutaceae). Braz. J. Bot. 2020, 43, 961–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cortez, P.A.; Ferreira, C.L.; Santos, G.N.H.; Pirani, J.R.; Urbano, K.D.; Devecchi, M.F.; Cruz, R.; Gabia, V.S.; Melo-de-Pinna, G.F.A. Strategies for the protection of shoot buds in phanerophyte and geophyte species of Homalolepis Turcz. (Simaroubaceae, Sapindales). Braz. J. Bot. 2022, 45, 497–513. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bory, G.; Clair-Maczulajtys, D. Importance of foliar nectaries in the physiology of tree of heaven (Ailanthus glandulosa Desf., Simaroubaceae). Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. Lett. Bot. 1990, 137, 139–155. [Google Scholar]
  14. Villatoro-Moreno, H.; Solís-Montero, L.; González-Gómez, R.; Maza-Villalobos, S.; Hernández, J.C.; Castillo-Vera, A. Extrafloral nectaries in Nephelium lappaceum (Sapindaceae). Bot. Sci. 2023, 101, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. O’Dowd, D.J. Foliar nectar production and ant activity on a Neotropical tree Ochroma pyramidale. Oecologia 1979, 43, 233–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Rico-Gray, V.; Thien, L.B. Effect of different ant species on the reproductive fitness of Schomburgkia tibicinis (Orchidaceae). Oecologia 1989, 81, 487–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Oliveira, P.S. The ecological function of extrafloral nectaries: Herbivore deterrence by visiting ants and reproductive output in Cariocar brasiliense (Caryocaraceae). Funct. Ecol. 1997, 11, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Marazzi, B.; Bronstein, J.L.; Koptur, S. The diversity, ecology and evolution of extrafloral nectaries: Current perspectives and future challenges. Ann. Bot. 2013, 111, 1243–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Heil, M. Extrafloral nectar at the plant-insect interface: A spotlight on chemical ecology, phenotypic plasticity, and food webs. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 2015, 60, 213–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Carter, C.; Thornburg, R.W. Is the nectar redox cycle a floral defense against microbial attack? Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 320–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Raguso, R.A. Why some floral nectars scented? Ecology 2004, 85, 1486–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Monteiro, M.M.; Demarco, D. Corona development and floral nectaries of Asclepiadeae (Asclepiadoideae, Apocynaceae). Acta Bot. Bras. 2017, 31, 420–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Demarco, D. Histochemical analysis of plant secretory structures. In Histochemistry of Single Molecules. Methods and Protocols, 2nd ed.; Pellicciari, C., Biggiogera, M., Malatesta, M., Eds.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2023; Volume 2566, pp. 291–310. [Google Scholar]
  24. Morellato, L.P.C.; Oliveira, P.S. Distribution of extrafloral nectaries in different vegetation types of Amazonian Brazil. Flora 1991, 185, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Acevedo-Rodríguez, P. A revision of Lophostigma (Sapindaceae). Syst. Bot. 1993, 18, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Acevedo-Rodríguez, P. Systematics of Serjania (Sapindaceae). Part I: A revision of Serjania sect. Platycoccus. Mem. N. Y. Bot. Gard. 1993, 67, 1–93. [Google Scholar]
  27. Fiala, B.; Linsenmair, E. Distribution and abundance of plants with extrafloral nectaries in the woody flora of a lowland primary forest in Malaysia. Biodivers. Conserv. 1995, 4, 165–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Koptur, S.; William, P.; Olive, Z. Ants and plants with extrafloral nectaries in fire successional habitats on Andros (Bahamas). Fla. Entomol. 2010, 93, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Boudouris, J.; Queenborough, S.A. Diversity and distribution of extra-floral nectaries in the Cerrado savanna vegetation of Brazil. PeerJ 2013, 1, e219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Devecchi, M.F.; Pirani, J.R. A new species of Simaba sect. Grandiflorae (Simaroubaceae) from Jalapão region, Tocantins, Brazil. Phytotaxa 2015, 227, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pirani, J.R.; Majure, L.C.; Devecchi, M.F. An updated account of Simaroubaceae with emphasis on American taxa. Braz. J. Bot. 2022, 45, 201–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mohan, J.S.S.; Inamdar, J.A. Ultrastructure and secretion of extrafloral nectaries of Plumeria rubra L. Ann. Bot. 1986, 57, 389–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Thomas, V.; Dave, Y. Histochemistry and senescence of colleters of Allamanda cathartica L. (Apocynaceae). Ann. Bot. 1989, 64, 201–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Thomas, V.; Dave, Y. The colleters of Alstonia scholaris L. (Apocynaceae). Indian Bot. Contact. 1989, 6, 25–29. [Google Scholar]
  35. Appezzato-da-Glória, B.; Estelita, M.E.M. Development, structure and distribution of colleters in Mandevilla illustris and M. velutina (Apocynaceae). Rev. Bras. Bot. 2000, 23, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gama, T.S.S.; Aguiar-Dias, A.C.A.; Demarco, D. Transfer cells in trichomatous nectary in Adenocalymma magnificum (Bignoniaceae). An. Acad. Bras. Ciências 2016, 88, 527–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Gunning, B.E.S.; Pate, J.S. “Transfer cells”: Plant cells with wall ingrowths, specialized in relation to short distance transport of solutes—Their occurrence, structure, and development. Protoplasma 1969, 68, 107–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pate, J.S.; Gunning, B.E.S. Transfer cells. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1972, 23, 173–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ning-Xi, H.N.; Wu, P. The structural and developmental characteristics of floral nectaries of Litchi chinensis and their biological significance. Acta Phytotaxon. Sin. 2005, 44, 523–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bachelier, J.B.; Endress, P.K. Floral structure of Kirkia (Kirkiaceae) and its position in Sapindales. Ann. Bot. 2008, 102, 539–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bachelier, J.B.; Endress, P.K. Comparative floral morphology and anatomy of Anacardiaceae and Burseraceae (Sapindales), with a special focus on gynoecium structure and evolution. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2009, 159, 499–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Solís, S.M.; Ferrucci, M.S. The floral nectary of Cardiospermum grandiflorum and Urvillea chacoënsis (Sapindaceae): Morphoanatomy and ontogeny. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 2009, 46, 485–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kubitzki, K. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Vol. X. Flowering Plants. Eudicots. Sapindales, Cucurbitales, Myrtales; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  44. Tölke, E.E.A.D.; Galetto, L.; Machado, S.R.; Lacchia, A.P.S.; Carmello-Guerreiro, S.M. Stages of development of the floral secretory disk in Tapirira guianensis Aubl. (Anacardiaceae), a dioecious species. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2015, 179, 533–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tölke, E.D.; Bachelier, J.B.; Lima, E.A.; Galetto, L.; Demarco, D.; Carmello-Guerreiro, S.M. Diversity of floral nectary secretions and structure, and implications for their evolution in Anacardiaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2018, 187, 209–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Avalos, A.A.; Lattar, E.C.; Galati, B.G.; Ferrucci, M.S. Nectary structure and ultrastructure in two floral morphs of Koelreuteria elegans subsp. formosana (Sapindaceae). Flora 2017, 226, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Solís, S.M.; Zini, L.M.; González, V.V.; Ferrucci, M.S. Floral nectaries in Sapindaceae s.s.: Morphological and structural diversity, and their systematic implications. Protoplasma 2017, 254, 2169–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. El Ottra, J.H.L.; Demarco, D.; Pirani, J.R. Comparative floral structure and evolution in Galipeinae (Galipeeae: Rutaceae) and its implications at different systematic levels. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2019, 191, 30–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gama, R.L.; El Ottra, J.H.L.; Pirani, J.R.; Demarco, D. Gynodioecy in Trichilia (Meliaceae) and a peculiar case of male sterility due to tapetal necrotic cell death. Braz. J. Bot. 2022, 45, 449–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jackson, S.; Nicolson, S.W. Xylose as a nectar sugar: From biochemistry to ecology. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 2002, 131, 613–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Castro, M.M.; Demarco, D. Phenolic compounds produced by secretory structures in plants: A brief review. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2008, 3, 1273–1284. [Google Scholar]
  52. Grayer, R.J.; Harborne, J.B. A survey of antifungal compounds from higher plants, 1982–1993. Phytochemistry 1994, 37, 19–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Treutter, D. Significance of flavonoids in plant resistance: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2006, 4, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Samanta, A.; Das, G.; Das, S.K. Roles of flavonoids in plants. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Tech. 2011, 6, 12–35. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ribeiro, J.C.; Ferreira, M.J.P.; Demarco, D. Colleters in Asclepiadoideae (Apocynaceae): Protection of meristems against desiccation and new functions assigned. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2017, 178, 465–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lanza, J.; Vargo, E.L.; Pulim, S.; Chang, Y.Z. Preferences of the fire ants Solenopsis invicta and S. geminata (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) for amino acid and sugar components of extrafloral nectars. Environ. Entomol. 1993, 22, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Blüthgen, N.; Fiedler, K. Preferences for sugars and amino acids and their conditionality in a diverse nectar-feeding ant community. J. Anim. Ecol. 2004, 73, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nicolson, S.W.; Thornburg, R.G. Nectar chemistry. In Nectaries and Nectar; Nicolson, S.W., Nepi, M., Pacini, E., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 215–264. [Google Scholar]
  59. Grasso, D.A.; Pandolfi, C.; Bazihizina, N.; Nocentini, D.; Nepi, M.; Mancuso, S. Extrafloral-nectar-based partner manipulation in plant–ant relationships. AoB Plants 2015, 7, plv002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Marazzi, B.; Conti, E.; Sanderson, M.J.; McMahon, M.M.; Bronstein, J.L. Diversity and evolution of a trait mediating ant—Plant interactions: Insights from extrafloral nectaries in Senna (Leguminosae). Ann. Bot. 2013, 111, 1263–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Medina, M.C.; Sousa-Baena, M.S.; Prado, E.; Acevedo-Rodríguez, P.; Dias, P.; Demarco, D. Laticifers in Sapindaceae: Structure, evolution and phylogenetic importance. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 612985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Johansen, D.A. Plant Microtechnique; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1940. [Google Scholar]
  63. Lillie, R.D. Histopathologic Technic and Practical Histochemistry, 3rd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1965. [Google Scholar]
  64. Gerlach, D. Botanish Mikrotechnik: Eine Einführung, 3rd ed.; Georg Thieme: Stuttgart, Germany, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  65. McManus, J.F.A. Histological and histochemical uses of periodic acid. Stain Technol. 1948, 23, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gregory, M.; Baas, P. A survey of mucilage cells in vegetative organs of the dicotyledons. Isr. J. Bot. 1989, 38, 125–174. [Google Scholar]
  67. Pizzolato, T.D. Staining of Tilia mucilages with Mayer’s tannic acid-ferric chloride. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 1977, 104, 277–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Fisher, D.B. Protein staining of ribboned epon sections for light microscopy. Histochemie 1968, 16, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pearse, A.G.E. Histochemistry: Theoretical and Applied, 4th ed.; C. Livingstone: Edinburgh, UK, 1985; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  70. Cain, A.J. The use of Nile Blue in the examination of lipids. Quart. J. Microsc. Sci. 1947, 88, 383–392. [Google Scholar]
  71. Ganter, P.; Jollés, G. Histochimie Normale et Pathologique; Gauthier-Villars: Paris, France, 1969; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  72. Ganter, P.; Jollés, G. Histochimie Normale et Pathologique; Gauthier-Villars: Paris, France, 1970; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  73. Svendsen, A.B.; Verpoorte, R. Chromatography of Alkaloids; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  74. Furr, M.; Mahlberg, P.G. Histochemical analyses of laticifers and glandular trichomes in Cannabis sativa. J. Nat. Prod. 1981, 44, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lisec, J.; Schauer, N.; Kopka, J.; Willmitzer, L.; Fernie, A.R. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-based metabolite profiling in plants. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 387–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Plants 12 03411 g001
Figure 1. Leaf of Urvillea ulmacea Kunth. (A) Leaflets with dentate margin. Note nectaries in the tooth apex. (B) Detail of image A. (Arrow = extrafloral nectary).
Figure 1. Leaf of Urvillea ulmacea Kunth. (A) Leaflets with dentate margin. Note nectaries in the tooth apex. (B) Detail of image A. (Arrow = extrafloral nectary).
Plants 12 03411 g001
Plants 12 03411 g002
Figure 2. Micromorphology of the extrafloral nectaries of Urvillea ulmacea Kunth. Scanning electron microscopy. (A) EFN on the abaxial surface of the tooth apex. (B) General view of the nectary (ocellus). (C) Nectariferous epidermis composed of irregularly arranged cells. (D) Detail of the secretory epidermis. Note the smooth cuticle and the absence of stomata.
Figure 2. Micromorphology of the extrafloral nectaries of Urvillea ulmacea Kunth. Scanning electron microscopy. (A) EFN on the abaxial surface of the tooth apex. (B) General view of the nectary (ocellus). (C) Nectariferous epidermis composed of irregularly arranged cells. (D) Detail of the secretory epidermis. Note the smooth cuticle and the absence of stomata.
Plants 12 03411 g002
Plants 12 03411 g003
Figure 3. Structure of the extrafloral nectaries of Urvillea ulmacea Kunth. Light microscopy. (A–C,E) Bright field. (A) General view of the nectary on abaxial surface of the leaflet. (B) Nectariferous tissue situated on a layer of transfer cells. (C) Detail of the nectary. Note the secretory cells full of secretion, and the transfer cells containing phenolic compounds. (D) Developing nectary. Note numerous cells in different phases of cell division. Section stained with astra blue and safranin observed under blue light. (E) Vascular bundle of the nectary mainly composed of phloem. (F) Xylem vessels and crystals beneath the nectary evidenced by polarized light. (L = laticifer; NT = nectariferous tissue; PI = phenolic idioblast; TL = transfer layer; VB = vascular bundle; Xy = xylem).
Figure 3. Structure of the extrafloral nectaries of Urvillea ulmacea Kunth. Light microscopy. (A–C,E) Bright field. (A) General view of the nectary on abaxial surface of the leaflet. (B) Nectariferous tissue situated on a layer of transfer cells. (C) Detail of the nectary. Note the secretory cells full of secretion, and the transfer cells containing phenolic compounds. (D) Developing nectary. Note numerous cells in different phases of cell division. Section stained with astra blue and safranin observed under blue light. (E) Vascular bundle of the nectary mainly composed of phloem. (F) Xylem vessels and crystals beneath the nectary evidenced by polarized light. (L = laticifer; NT = nectariferous tissue; PI = phenolic idioblast; TL = transfer layer; VB = vascular bundle; Xy = xylem).
Plants 12 03411 g003
Plants 12 03411 g004
Figure 4. Histochemical analysis of the extrafloral nectaries of Urvillea ulmacea Kunth. (A,B) Fluorescence microscopy. (C–F) Bright field. (A,B) Suberized walls of the transfer cells evidenced by yellow fluorescence under blue light (A) and blue fluorescence under UV (B). Sections stained with astra blue and safranin. (C) Suberin of the transfer cells stained with Sudan black B. (D) Carbohydrates detected by PAS reaction. (E) Proteins and/or amino acids identified using aniline blue black. (F) Phenolic compounds evidenced by ferric chloride (NT = nectariferous tissue; TL = transfer layer).
Figure 4. Histochemical analysis of the extrafloral nectaries of Urvillea ulmacea Kunth. (A,B) Fluorescence microscopy. (C–F) Bright field. (A,B) Suberized walls of the transfer cells evidenced by yellow fluorescence under blue light (A) and blue fluorescence under UV (B). Sections stained with astra blue and safranin. (C) Suberin of the transfer cells stained with Sudan black B. (D) Carbohydrates detected by PAS reaction. (E) Proteins and/or amino acids identified using aniline blue black. (F) Phenolic compounds evidenced by ferric chloride (NT = nectariferous tissue; TL = transfer layer).
Plants 12 03411 g004
Plants 12 03411 g005
Figure 5. Chromatogram of compounds detected in the nectary of Urvillea ulmacea Kunth. Compounds exclusively detected in the nectar (arrows) are described in Table 2.
Figure 5. Chromatogram of compounds detected in the nectary of Urvillea ulmacea Kunth. Compounds exclusively detected in the nectar (arrows) are described in Table 2.
Plants 12 03411 g005
Plants 12 03411 g006
Figure 6. Chromatograms detected at 352 nm from the methanol extracts of nectaries (above) and leaves (below) of Urvillea ulmacea Kunth.
Figure 6. Chromatograms detected at 352 nm from the methanol extracts of nectaries (above) and leaves (below) of Urvillea ulmacea Kunth.
Plants 12 03411 g006
Plants 12 03411 g007
Figure 7. UV spectra of phenolic compounds (1–3 and 6) found exclusively in the nectaries of Urvillea ulmacea Kunth.
Figure 7. UV spectra of phenolic compounds (1–3 and 6) found exclusively in the nectaries of Urvillea ulmacea Kunth.
Plants 12 03411 g007
Table 1. Histochemical tests applied to extrafloral nectaries of Urvillea ulmacea Kunth to identify the chemical classes of metabolites that compose the nectar.
Table 1. Histochemical tests applied to extrafloral nectaries of Urvillea ulmacea Kunth to identify the chemical classes of metabolites that compose the nectar.
Histochemical TestTarget SubstanceNectar
PAS reactioncarbohydrates+
Ruthenium redacidic mucilage−
Tannic acid and ferric chloridemucilage−
Lugol’s reagentstarch−
Aniline blue blackproteins+
Sudan black Blipids−
Sudan IVlipids−
Nile blueacidic and neutral lipids−
Copper acetate and rubeanic acidfatty acids−
Ferric chloridephenolic compounds+
Ferrous sulphate-formalinphenolic compounds+
Dragendorff’s reagentalkaloids−
Wagner’s reagentalkaloids−
Note. + = present; − = absent.
Table 2. Identification of compounds, chemical classes, and their respective relative percentual found in the nectar of Urvillea ulmacea Kunth.
Table 2. Identification of compounds, chemical classes, and their respective relative percentual found in the nectar of Urvillea ulmacea Kunth.
CompoundChemical ClassRetention Time (Rt; min)Relative Percentual (%)
N-acetyl-valineamino acid15.732.61
8-aminooctanoic acidamino acid16.3611.58
Xylitolsugar20.3619.66
D-fructosesugar24.0121.29
D-glucosesugar24.5117.84
1-Monopalmitin *lipid35.823.24
Sucrosesugar37.3523.78
amino acids 14.19
lipids 3.24
sugars 82.57
Note: * 1-monopalmitin: glyceryl palmitate.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maximo, D.; Ferreira, M.J.P.; Demarco, D. Inaugural Description of Extrafloral Nectaries in Sapindaceae: Structure, Diversity and Nectar Composition. Plants 2023, 12, 3411. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12193411

AMA Style

Maximo D, Ferreira MJP, Demarco D. Inaugural Description of Extrafloral Nectaries in Sapindaceae: Structure, Diversity and Nectar Composition. Plants. 2023; 12(19):3411. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12193411

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maximo, Danielle, Marcelo J. P. Ferreira, and Diego Demarco. 2023. "Inaugural Description of Extrafloral Nectaries in Sapindaceae: Structure, Diversity and Nectar Composition" Plants 12, no. 19: 3411. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12193411

APA Style

Maximo, D., Ferreira, M. J. P., & Demarco, D. (2023). Inaugural Description of Extrafloral Nectaries in Sapindaceae: Structure, Diversity and Nectar Composition. Plants, 12(19), 3411. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12193411

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop