Next Article in Journal
A 14-3-3 Protein-Encoding Gene, BdGF14g, Confers Better Drought Tolerance by Regulating ABA Biosynthesis and Signaling
Next Article in Special Issue
Physiological and Agronomical Response of Coffee to Different Nitrogen Forms with and without Water Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Anglana et al. Dittrichia viscosa Selection Strategy Based on Stress Produces Stable Clonal Lines for Phytoremediation Applications. Plants 2023, 12, 2499
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimizing Nitrogen Application for Jojoba under Intensive Cultivation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 23
10.3390/plants12233974
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhancing Wheat Gluten Content and Processing Quality: An Analysis of Drip Irrigation Nitrogen Frequency

by
Tianjia Hao
1,2,3,
Rong Chen
1,
Jing Jia
1,
Changxing Zhao
1,*,
Yihang Du
1,
Wenlu Li
1,
Ludi Zhao
1 and
Hongxiao Duan
1
1
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Dryland Farming Technology, College of Agronomy, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
2
Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in Downstream of Yangtze Plain, Ministry of Agriculture Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
3
College of Agronomy, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(23), 3974; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12233974
Submission received: 21 October 2023 / Revised: 22 November 2023 / Accepted: 24 November 2023 / Published: 26 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of Nitrogen in Plant Growth and Development)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Drip irrigation is a water-saving and fertilizer-saving application technology used in recent years, with which the frequency of drip irrigation nitrogen application has not yet been determined. In order to investigate the effects of different drip irrigation nitrogen application frequencies on the processing quality of medium-gluten wheat (Jimai22) and strong-gluten wheat (Jimai20 and Shiluan02-1), a two-year field experiment was carried out. Two frequencies of water and N application were set under the same conditions of total N application (210 kg·ha−1) and total irrigation (120 mm): DIF4, consisting of four equal applications of water and N (each of 30 kg·ha−1 of N application and 30 mm of irrigation) and DIF2, consisting of two equal applications of water and N (each of 60 kg·ha−1 of N application and 60 mm of irrigation). The results showed that IF4 significantly increased protein content by 2–8.6%, wet gluten content by 4.5–22.1%, and hardness value (p > 0.05), and PC2 was considered as a protein factor; the sedimentation value was highly significantly correlated with most of the parameters of the flour stretch (p < 0.01). DIF4 improved the stretching quality, and the flour quality of Jima22 was decreased, the flour quality of strong-gluten wheats Jimai20 and Shiluan02-1 was improved, and PC1 was considered to be the dough factor. In conclusion, although the frequency of nitrogen application by drip irrigation increased the protein factor and improved the tensile quality, the flour quality was not necessarily enhanced.

1. Introduction

Nitrogen fertilizer plays a crucial role in the continuous increase in wheat yield in China [1,2]. It has been difficult to improve yield using traditional fertilization methods [3,4], and it is increasingly important to improve quality and efficiency. The sustainable development of the wheat industry requires the synergistic improvement of wheat yield and quality, so the improvement of grain quality while emphasizing the improvement of yield has become an urgent problem in China [5]. Nowadays, people are gradually changing from “eating enough” to “eating well”, and there is an urgent need for field cultivation to realize the synergistic improvement of grain yield and quality [6,7].
China’s traditional mode of irrigation is border irrigation (heavy flooding of fields with ridges), and the mode of fertilizer application is to spread fertilizers (sprinkle fertilizer on the surface of the field), resulting in serious losses of water and nitrogen and harming the environment [8,9]. China feeds 21% of the world’s population with 9% of its arable land and 6% of its fresh water, and limited resources and environmental sustainability are severely constraining the supply of agricultural products [9]. Water–fertilizer integration technology originated in Israel in the 1960s, and drip irrigation equipment was introduced in China in the 1970s, and is now in the stage of vigorous promotion and application in China [10]. Drip irrigation realizes the coupled application of water and nitrogen into the soil at the root system [11], which not only improves the efficiency of water and nitrogen utilization and reduces the irrational use of resources [12], but also protects the environment and reduces N wetting [13] and C emissions [14].
Nitrogen is an important factor affecting the protein and wet gluten content of wheat [15], and the quality of wheat dough and pasta is largely influenced by protein content and gluten quality [16,17]. Changes in grain color may affect the color of the flour and the final product and may be influenced by changes in other grain traits [18]. Hardness is related to protein content [19,20]. The rheological properties of wheat have improved significantly since 1986, while the flour properties have remained relatively stable [21]. Xue et al. downscaled the relevant quality traits of wheat and concluded that flour quality is mainly influenced by the rheological properties of dough [22]. Gliadins and glutens comprise the GSPs (Grain Storage proteins), which are the main body of gluten [23,24] and together account for 60–80% of the total seed proteins, determining the elasticity (tensile area) and ductility of the dough, and determining the processing qualities of the various end-products [25]. Nitrogen treatment alters the expression levels of genes involved in storage protein production [26]. Wheat gluten proteins have a high molecular weight and form a network skeleton that provides gluten strength (resistance to deformation) as well as dough elasticity [27,28], which is decisive for the rheological properties of dough [29]. Sedimentation values show a highly significant positive correlation with quality traits [30] and can be used as a comprehensive indicator of quality [21].
The net productivity of N from jointing to flowering was significantly correlated with yield [31]. Rational regulation of leaf senescence can improve yield and quality by influencing photosynthesis and nutrient remobilization [32], and less research has been conducted on water N application during the irrigation period. Whether split application of nitrogen fertilizer through drip irrigation facilities can further improve wheat quality is yet to be investigated. It is particularly important to establish crop management measures for drip irrigation fertilization. In this study, different varieties of medium-gluten and strong-gluten wheat were selected by setting up high and low frequencies of drip irrigation nitrogen application, comparing the differences in processing quality and exploring the following: (1) the effects of drip irrigation nitrogen application frequency on the dough quality traits of medium-gluten and strong-gluten wheats and (2) the relationship between the dough quality traits.

2. Results

2.1. CIE, Hardness Value, Protein Content, Wet/Dry Gluten Content, Sedimentation Value

Year had a significant effect (p < 0.05) on CIE a*, and a highly significant effect (p < 0.01) on CIE L*, CIE b*, protein content, and gluten content (Table 1), but not on hardness value and settling value. The hardness values in this study were not affected by the variety factor, probably because the hardness of these three varieties was similar. All these traits were highly significantly affected (p < 0.01) when only water nitrogen frequency was considered, and it is necessary to regulate seed appearance color CIE L*a*b* (Commission Internationale d’Eclairage LAB color space), hardness attributes, protein content, gluten content, and sedimentation value by improving water nitrogen frequency. There were highly significant (p < 0.01) changes in protein content and gluten content when year, variety, and frequency interacted.
The protein content of the three varieties with high frequency of nitrogen application was significantly higher than that with low frequency by 2–8.6% (Figure 1), and applying nitrogen fertilizer at all critical periods instead of separately at the nodulation and flowering stages resulted in higher protein content. Shiluan02-1 had the highest protein content (14.3–17.2%), followed by Jimai20 (12.8–15.3%) and Jimai22 (12.8–14.1%). The protein content of the second year was lower than the first year, which might have been antagonized by the yield [33,34], which was 43% higher than the first year as shown in our previous study [35]. High frequency of nitrogen application increased the hardness of the grains, but it was possible that the large differences between the grains resulted in no significant differences between treatments (Figure 2). High frequency of nitrogen application reduced the brightness of wheat kernels, increased redness, and reduced yellowness; CIE L* was lower in DIF4 than in DIF2; CIE a* was higher than in DIF2; and CIE b* was lower than in DIF2 (Figure 3).
Wet gluten content was significantly increased by 4.5–22.1% under high-frequency drip irrigation with nitrogen application, and the difference in dry gluten content of Jimai20 in the second year was not significant, with the three varieties increasing by 7.1–37% (Figure 4). The wet gluten content of Jimai20 and Shiluan02-1 varied little between the two years, and the wet gluten content of Jimai22 in the second year was higher than that of the first year, although the gluten index of Jimai22 in the second year was lower than that of the first year by 17.6–28.3%. Although the wet gluten content of Jimai22 was slightly higher than that of Jimai20 and Shiluan02-1, the gluten index was lower than that of both. High-frequency nitrogen application decreased the sedimentation value of Jimai22 and increased the sedimentation value of Jimai20 and Shiluan02-1 (Figure 5). There was no significant difference in the sedimentation values of Jimai22, except for Shiluan02-1 in the second year, where the sedimentation values of DIF4 were significantly higher than those of DIF2 by 3.1–12.8%.

2.2. Flour Quality

Year had a significant effect (p < 0.05) on stabilization time (Table 2). Variety had a significant effect (p < 0.05) on water absorption, and both had highly significant effects (p < 0.01) on the other flour quality traits, respectively. Different frequencies of nitrogen application had a highly significant effect (p < 0.01) on stabilization time of dough and a significant effect (p < 0.05) on FQC; frequency of nitrogen application can affect flour quality. When the three factors interacted with each other, the stabilization time, moisture content, and tolerance index were affected, and the final flour quality was also affected.
Medium-gluten wheat Jimai22 had higher flour quality under two drip fertilization applications, while the opposite was true for strong-gluten wheats Jimai20 and Shiluan02-1 (Table 2). In both years, the FQC (flour quality index) of DIF4 was significantly 23–80% higher than that of DIF2 for the strong-gluten varieties Jimai20 and Shiluan02-1, with the exception of Shiluan02-1 in the second year, which had higher stability time and development time, and lower values of tolerance index as well as a decrease in consistency after 10 min. The FQC of DIF4 of Jimai22 was lower than that of DIF2, but there was no significant difference. In both years, the water absorption, development time, and stability time of Jimai22 were higher for DIF2 than for DIF4, and the degree of weakening after 10 min was higher for DIF4 than for DIF2, while the opposite was true for the strong-gluten wheats Jimai20 and Shiluan02-1. This may be due to the fact that the gluten index of DIF4 was lower than that of DIF2 in Jimai22, which reached a significant level in the second year (Table 3). The gluten indexes of strong wheats Jimai20 and Shiluan02-1 were close to 100%, and there was no difference between the different drip irrigation N application frequencies.

2.3. Tensile Quality

Frequency of water nitrogen application had significant (p < 0.05) effect on tensile area (Table 4); year, variety and frequency had highly significant (p < 0.01) effects on other tensile traits, respectively; and when all the three were inter-cropped, extensibility was highly significantly affected (p < 0.01).
High-frequency drip irrigation application of nitrogen increased the tensile area and extensibility of wheat dough, reduced the maximum resistance to extension as well as the resistance value at 5 cm, and improved the tensile quality (Table 4). The extensibility of DIF4 was significantly higher than that of DIF2 by 9.3–23.7%, except for the second year’s Shiluan02-1. The maximum drag of DIF4 of the two years’ Shiluan02-1 was significantly lower than that of DIF2 by 9.4% and 9.9%, respectively, and there was no significant difference in the maximum drag of Jimai22.
The tensile area and maximum drag of Shiluan02-1 were higher than that of Jimai20, and Jimai22 was the weakest. Except for the extensibility of Jimai22 in the first year, the linear fits of extensibility and maximum drag of all three varieties were significant or highly significant above the 0.05 level, with extensibility showing a parabola with an upward opening and maximum drag showing a parabola with a downward opening (Figure 6). The trend of wheat flour tensile quality with time was similar to a parabola.

2.4. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

PCA was used to visualize the variation in rheological properties of wheat by simplifying a large number of traits into PCs, with PC1 and PC2 describing 49.9% and 19.3% of the overall variance, respectively (Figure 7). Powdery stretching traits were strongly positively correlated with PC1, protein content and extensibility were strongly positively correlated with PC2, and CIE L*a*b*of the kernel was strongly negatively correlated with PC2. Compared to DIF4, DIF2 scored lower in PC2 due to lower protein content, extensibility, hardness value, and wet/dry gluten content in DIF2 than in DIF4. In the second year, Jimai20 and Shiluan02-1 scored higher in PC1, and the two-year-old Jimai22 scored negative in PC1. The flour stretch, sedimentation value, and protein content of Shiluan02-1 were higher of the two years.

2.5. Correlation Analysis

Positive and significant correlation (p ≤ 0.01) was found between CIE a* values and wet/dry gluten content of seeds, while negative and significant correlation (p ≤ 0.01) was found between CIE L* and b* values and PC (protein content), HV (hardness value), and E (extensibility), respectively (Figure 8). There was a highly significant positive correlation (p ≤ 0.05) between S (Sedimentation) and PC, and a significant correlation (p ≤ 0.01) between S and powder stretching parameters, except for WA (water absorption), MC (moisture content), and E, i.e., there was a significant positive correlation (p ≤ 0.01) between S and the powder stretching properties. Significant negative correlations (p ≤ 0.01) were found between DT (development time) and ST (stability time) and the decreasing values of TA (tensile area) and consistency after 10 min (lowering value in the 20th minute, weakening degree, lowering value in the 20th minute) as well as SR (stretch ratio), respectively, and a significant positive correlation (p ≤ 0.01) was found between DT and ST and FQC. Significant positive correlations were found between DT and ST at p ≤ 0.01 and stretch parameters except E. Very significant positive correlations were found between stretch parameters except E (p ≤ 0.01).

3. Discussion

In the actual sale of grain by Chinese farmers, weight and moisture are determined empirically by the buyer, and the actual purchase price is thus determined. Kernel color may be a more intuitive way to determine quality and thus price. Seed color L* and b* were highly correlated and both were negatively correlated with protein content [36,37], and grain color may be closely related to other grain traits [18]. This is consistent with this study where PC (p ≤ 0.01) and HV (p ≤ 0.05) showed significant negative correlation with L*, a* and b*, indicating that the lower the hardness and protein content, the brighter and yellower the grains were, increasing the frequency of nitrogen chasing with drip irrigation reduced the brightness and yellowness of the grains, and higher frequency of nitrogen application increased the redness of the grains. Grain a* and b* were inversely correlated with quality [36]; a* showed significant negative correlation with ST, TA, and E, but b* was not observed to show significant correlation with flour stretch.
Nitrogen application at the stage of booting to flowering increases the nitrogen content of the nutrient organs and thus ensures more transfer to the seed [38], where 1/3 of the nitrogen in the seed comes from retransfer from the nutrient organs and 2/3 comes from the newly absorbed nitrogen from the soil during the filling stage [39]. The nitrogen fertilizer application at the later stages of growth of the different plants or split nitrogen application is beneficial to increase the protein content [40]. In this study, DIF4 plants were supplied a greater amount of nitrogen at later growth stages and increasing the frequency of nitrogen application increased the protein content and wet gluten content versus dry gluten content. Nitrogen increases the protein content, changes its composition, and affects the rheological properties of dough; higher protein content leads to more stretchable dough [16] and flour from wheat with higher protein content has higher extensibility and lower maximum drag leading to a reduction in the maximum stretch ratio [41]. In this study, by increasing the frequency of nitrogen application through drip irrigation, the TA and E of the dough were increased and the stretch resistance was decreased, which led to a lower stretch ratio and an increase in the tensile quality. Wheat gluten strength varies in different genetic origins, which makes it difficult to determine the effect of protein content [17]. Higher gluten index resulted in higher water absorption, development time, and stabilization time [42]. The gluten index of medium-gluten wheat in this study was opposite to the gluten content, which may be due to the different protein fractions. A higher gluten index resulted in higher dough development time and stabilization time, decreased tolerance index, and increased flour’s flour quality. Numerous studies have demonstrated that higher protein content implies higher gluten proteins, which prolongs the dough development time [43]. In this study, the gluten index of strong-gluten varieties was nearly 100%, while the wet gluten content increased with the frequency of nitrogen application, which resulted in higher WA, DT, ST, and FQC for DIF4 than DF2, and increased flour quality. Numerous studies have shown that the sedimentation value is significantly correlated with other quality traits [30,44], and the sedimentation value can be used as a comprehensive index for evaluating wheat flour milling quality [21,44]. In this study, the sedimentation values were highly significantly correlated with other flour stretching parameters except E, WA, and WC; the flour quality of medium-gluten wheat may be affected by the gluten index; and the sedimentation values can be used as a comprehensive index for evaluating the flour stretching of strong-gluten wheat. Li et al. reported that after downscaling the processing quality of strong-gluten wheat, PC1 was representing the dough factor and PC2 was representing the protein factor [45], and the results of the present study are similar to them.
In fact, this study does not show a synergistic improvement effect of flour quality and tensile properties, although they are significantly correlated. In terms of the water and nitrogen frequency factor alone, high nitrogen application frequency had better tensile quality, and all stretching parameters were significantly affected by frequency, but not all of the flour quality parameters were affected and showed a more stable performance. Yang et al. previously reported that Chinese wheat varieties had improved dough rheological properties with more stable flour quality [21], so could this be attributed to improved stretch quality? In other studies, a consistent increase in tensile quality has been observed when factors are changed, but the corresponding change in flour quality has not been consistent [21,46]. It is difficult to synergize yield and quality at present, although there are some reports on the effects of fertilization and gene regulation on yield and protein content [47], but the improvement of processing quality in fact does not have much relationship with protein content. After all, glutenin determines the processing quality, and the content of gliadins, as a kind of harmful protein, should be reduced. Therefore, reducing the total protein content and increasing the content of glutenin fractions should be an important way to synergize the improvement of yield and quality.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Experimental Design

A 2-year field study was conducted in the Jiaozhou Modern Agricultural Science and Technology Demonstration Park, Qingdao, China (35.53°/N, 119.58°/E) during the winter wheat growing seasons of 2020–2022 on the soil type mortar-black soil, with rainfall of 226.7 mm and 145.1 mm in the two years, respectively. Deep tilling was followed by rotary tillage after straw was returned to the field. The seeds and compound fertilizer (N, P2O5, and K2O were all applied at 90 kg·ha−1) were sown by seed and fertilizer co-sowing machines each on 11 October 2020 and 28 October 2021, and wheat was harvested on 17 June 2021 and 18 June 2022. The sowing date of the second year was delayed by successive rainy days. The basic wheat seedlings were about 2.2 million plants-ha−1 in rows spaced 20 cm apart. Three rows of wheat were laid with one drip irrigation capillary tube (spaced 60 cm apart) and irrigated using drip heads. A more detailed overview of the pilot site can be found in a previously published article [35].
In this study, the medium-gluten wheat variety Jimai22, and the strong-gluten wheats Jimai20 and Shiluan02-1 were used, with a total nitrogen application rate of 210 kg·ha−1 (urea dissolved in water applied) and a total irrigation volume of 120 mm (measured by water meter). Two drip irrigation N application frequencies were set up: high-frequency drip irrigation N application (DIF4) and low-frequency drip irrigation N application (DIF2). In DIF4, water (40 mm) and nitrogen fertilizer (40 kg·ha−1) were applied equally at the jointing stage, booting stage, flowering stage, and filling stage, respectively, and in DIF2, water (60 mm) and nitrogen fertilizer (60 kg·ha−1) were applied equally at the jointing stage and flowering stage, respectively (Table 5).

4.2. Measurements

4.2.1. Preparation of Flour and Whole Wheat Flour

In each plot, 14 m2 of wheat was harvested, replicated three times and after maturation, flour was ground using a Laboratory Mill (the manufacturer is CHOPIN, the model number is MOULINCD1, the country is France). Some of the seeds were taken and whole wheat flour was ground using Grain Grinder (Retsch GmbH, TWISTER, German).

4.2.2. Determination of Protein Content

In total, 0.5000 g of whole wheat flour was taken and cooked at 400 °C for one and a half hours using a decoction oven, after which it was cooled for half an hour and analyzed using Kjeldahl Automatic Nitrogen Determination (Gerhardf, VAP50S-K20, German) to obtain the nitrogen content multiplied by a factor of 5.7 to give the crude protein content.

4.2.3. Determination of Gluten Content and Gluten Index

In total, 10.00 g of flour was taken and washed with 2% NaCl solution using the Gluten Washing Device (YUCEBAS-N2, Y07, Türkiye) to obtain wet gluten, weighed and recorded as M1, centrifuged using Gluten Index Device (YUCEBAS-N2, Y08, Türkiye), and the weight of the gluten on the tumbleweed was recorded as M2. After that, the gluten under the sieve and on the sun screen were dried together in the Gluten Dryer (YUCEBAS, Y09, Türkiye) and recorded as M3. This was calculated using the following formula:
WGC = M 1 10 × 100 %
GI = M 2 M 1 × 100 %
DGC = M 3 10 × 100 %
where WGC (%) is wet gluten content, GI (%) is gluten index and DGC (%) is dry gluten content.

4.2.4. Determination of Sedimentation Value

The sedimentation value of wheat flour was determined using the AACC-56-61-02. In total, 4.00 g of flour (14%) and 50 mL of distilled water were added to a 100 mL stoppered measuring cylinder, which was shaken well and allowed to stand for 5 min. Next, 2–3 drops of methyl blue indicator were added and then 25 mL of lactic acid/isopropanol solution (1:1) was added, after which it was mixed well and allowed to stand for 5 min and then volume of sediment was read as the sedimentation value.

4.2.5. Determination of Hardness Value

The hardness values of single kernels (30 kernels were determined) were determined using the Grain Hardness Tester (Hangzhou Dacheng Photoelectric Instrument Co., GWJ-2, Hangzhou, China) in kg or N; this was repeated 3 times.
Determination of the hardness value of a single grain (30 grains measured) using the Grain Hardness Tester (GWJ-2) was repeated 3 times. The grains were placed on the load table, the top bar was pressurized upwards, and the value displayed when the grains were broken was the hardness value in kg or N.

4.2.6. Powder and Tensile Parameters Testing

Flour stretching quality was determined using a flour stretching machine (YUCEBAS, Y01, Türkiye). In total, 300 g of flour (14%) and 6 g of NaCl were prepared for each sample and water was added (30 °C) within 20 s. The highest peak of consistency during the test was in the range of 500 ± 20 BU indicating accurate data. The powder quality parameters used were water absorption (WA), moisture content (WC), development time (DT), stability time (ST), tolerance index (TI), lowering value in the 10th minute (LV-10th), weakening degree (WD), lowering value in the 20th minute (LV-20th), and FQC. A tensile test was performed at 45 min, 90 min, and 135 min of awakening to determine the tensile parameters tensile area (TA), resistance value at 5 cm (RVF), extensibility (E), maximum drag (MD), stretch ratio (SR), and maximum stretch ratio (MSR).

4.2.7. Determination of CIE L*a*b*

The same volume (about 600–1000 kernels) of wheat kernels was placed in SeedCount trays, and the CIE L*a*b* (Commission Internationale d’Eclairage LAB color space) of the kernels was determined in three replicates by scanning the wheat kernels into an image through reflection using the Seed Image Analysis System (SeedCount, SC6000TR, Australia). CIE L*a*b*: L* was used for brightness with range 0–100 (dark (black)–light (white)), a* for red–green, negative–positive (green–red), b* for yellow–blue, negative–positive (blue–yellow).

4.3. Data Analysis

The data were organized in Excel. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26 to test the effect of the frequency of water and nitrogen applied to different drip irrigation follow-ups on protein content, gluten content, gluten index, CIE L*a*b*, sedimentation value, flour quality parameters and tensile quality parameters, and interactions between years, varieties, and treatments were examined using reciprocal effects analysis. Differences were compared at p < 0.05 using the Waller–Duncan test (Tukey’s HSD test) and plotted using Origin2021pro. Correlations between dough quality traits were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

5. Conclusions

Increasing the frequency of nitrogen application by drip irrigation significantly increased the protein content by 2–8.6%, and significantly increased the wet gluten content by 4.5–22.1%. The gluten index of medium-gluten wheat Jimai22 was decreased by 6.5–18.8%. CIE L*a*b* was significantly correlated with protein content and wet/dry gluten content (p < 0.01), and increasing the frequency of nitrogen application by drip irrigation decreased brightness and yellowness and increased redness. There was a highly significant correlation between sedimentation value and flour stretching parameters (except water absorption and water content), which can be used as a comprehensive index for evaluating the stretching parameters of gluten wheat flour. Increasing the frequency of nitrogen application by drip irrigation increased the flour tensile quality of strong-gluten wheat, and the tensile quality of medium-gluten wheat improved while the flour quality was decreased, which may have been the effect of the gluten index. After dimensionality reduction, PC1 for processing quality represented the dough factor and PC2 represented the protein factor. In conclusion, the protein and gluten contents can be increased by increasing the frequency of drip irrigation nitrogen application appropriately. In order to obtain higher processing quality, the strong-gluten wheats Jimai20 and Shiluan02-1 are suitable for four drip irrigation applications of nitrogen, and the medium-gluten wheat Jimai22 will obtain higher tensile quality and lower flour quality at four drip irrigation applications of nitrogen.

Author Contributions

T.H.: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing—original draft, and Writing—review and editing. R.C.: Investigation. J.J.: Investigation. C.Z.: Funding Acquisition; Project administration; Resources; Supervision. Y.D.: Investigation. W.L.: Investigation. L.Z.: Investigation. H.D.: Investigation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Project of Shandong Province (2022CXPT009), the Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Shandong Province (2019JZZY010716), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD0300604), and the Key Industrial Projects to Replace Old and New Driving Forces in Shandong Province (2021–2054).

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fan, M.; Shen, J.; Yuan, L.; Jiang, R.; Chen, X.; Davies, W.J.; Zhang, F. Improving crop productivity and resource use efficiency to ensure food security and environmental quality in China. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huang, P.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, A.; Xin, X.; Zhang, C.; Ma, D.; Yang, S.; Mirza, Z.; Wu, S. Coupled water and nitrogen (n) management as a key strategy for the mitigation of gaseous N losses in the Huang-Huai-Hai plain. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2014, 51, 333–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, H.; Wang, H.; Fang, Q.; Jia, B.; Li, D.; He, J.; Li, R. Effects of irrigation and nitrogen application on NO3−-N distribution in soil, nitrogen absorption, utilization and translocation by winter wheat. Agric. Water Manag. 2023, 276, 108058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, S.; Li, Z.; Si, J.; Bi, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, F.; Feng, B.; Shi, J.; Liu, K. Nitrogen fertilizer management on wheat yield and nitrogen utilization. J. Plant Nutr. 2022, 45, 1953–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hu, X.; Sun, L.; Zhou, G.; Wu, L.; Lu, W.; Li, W.; Wang, S.; Yang, X.; Song, J.; Wang, B. Variations of wheat quality in China from 2006 to 2015. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2016, 49, 3063–3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, H.; Hu, Y.; Dai, Q.; Xing, Z.; Wei, H.; Sun, C.; Gao, H.; Hu, Q. Discussions on frontiers and directions of scientific and technological innovation in China’s field crop cultivation. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2022, 55, 4373–7382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pramanick, B.; Mahapatra, B.S.; Datta, D.; Dey, P.; Singh, S.P.; Kumar, A.; Paramanik, B.; Awasthi, N. An innovative approach to improve oil production and quality of mustard (Brassica juncea L.) with multi-nutrient-rich polyhalite. Heliyon 2023, 9, e13997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Deng, X.; Shan, L.; Zhang, H.; Turner, N.C. Improving agricultural water use efficiency in arid and semiarid areas of China. Agric. Water Manag. 2006, 80, 23–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kang, S.; Hao, X.; Du, T.; Tong, L.; Su, X.; Lu, H.; Li, X.; Huo, Z.; Li, S.; Ding, R. Improving agricultural water productivity to ensure food security in China under changing environment: From research to practice. Agric. Water Manag. 2017, 179, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shi, X.; Pei, X.; Dang, J.; Zhang, D. Research progress on high-yield, high-quality, high-efficiency and ecology cultivation of wheat micro-sprinkling and drip fertigation. Crops 2022, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ma, C.; Liu, S.; Wang, X.; Wang, L.; Muhammad, T.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Sun, Z.; Li, Y. Coupling regulation of root-zone soil water and fertilizer for summer maize with drip irrigation. Water 2022, 14, 3680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, X.; Cai, X.; Li, Q.; Ren, B.; Bi, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, D. Effects of nitrogen application rate on summer maize (Zea mays L.) yield and water–nitrogen use efficiency under micro–sprinkling irrigation in the huang–huai–hai plain of China. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2022, 68, 1915–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sui, J.; Wang, J.; Gong, S.; Xu, D.; Zhang, Y. Effect of nitrogen and irrigation application on water movement and nitrogen transport for a wheat crop under drip irrigation in the north China plain. Water 2015, 7, 6651–6672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Feng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, C.; Yin, X.; Chu, Q.; Chen, F. Sustainable options for reducing carbon inputs and improving the eco-efficiency of smallholder wheat-maize cropping systems in the huanghuaihai farming region of China. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 244, 118887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Blandino, M.; Marinaccio, F.; Reyneri, A. Effect of late-season nitrogen fertilization on grain yield and on flour rheological quality and stability in common wheat, under different production situations. Ital. J. Agron. 2016, 11, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Trevisan, S.; Salimi Khorshidi, A.; Scanlon, M.G. Relationship between nitrogen functionality and wheat flour dough rheology: Extensional and shear approaches. Food Res. Int. 2022, 162 Pt B, 112049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Edwards, N.M.; Dexter, J.E.; Scanlon, M.G.; Cenkowski, S. Relationship of creep-recovery and dynamic oscillatory measurements to durum wheat physical dough properties. Cereal Chem. 1999, 76, 638–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Peterson, C.J.; Shelton, D.R.; Martin, T.J.; Sears, R.G.; Williams, E.; Graybosch, R.A. Grain color stability and classification of hard white wheat in the U.S. Euphytica 2001, 119, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pasha, I.; Anjum, F.M.; Morris, C.F. Grain hardness: A major determinant of wheat quality. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2010, 16, 511–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Symes, K.J. The inheritance of grain hardness in wheat as measured by the particle size index. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1964, 16, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, X.; Wu, L.; Zhu, Z.; Ren, G.; Liu, S. Variation and trends in dough rheological properties and flour quality in 330 chinese wheat varieties. Crop J. 2014, 2, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xue, X.; Gao, Q.; Yang, Z. Principal components analysis on major quality traits of winter wheat. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2011, 27, 38–41. [Google Scholar]
  23. Belton, P.S. Mini review on the elasticity of wheat gluten. J. Cereal Sci. 1999, 29, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ewart, J.A.D. A modified hypothesis for the structure and rheology of glutelins. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1972, 23, 687–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Rasheed, A.; Xia, X.; Yan, Y.; Appels, R.; Mahmood, T.; He, Z. Wheat seed storage proteins: Advances in molecular genetics, diversity and breeding applications. J. Cereal Sci. 2014, 60, 11–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yu, X.; Chen, X.; Wang, L.; Yang, Y.; Zhu, X.; Shao, S.; Cui, W.; Xiong, F. Novel insights into the effect of nitrogen on storage protein biosynthesis and protein body development in wheat caryopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2259–2274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cornec, M.; Popineau, Y.; Lefebvre, J. Characterisation of gluten subfractions by se-hplc and dynamic rheological analysis in shear. J. Cereal Sci. 1994, 19, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Khatkar, B.S.; Bell, A.E.; Schofield, J.D. The dynamic rheological properties of glutens and gluten sub-fractions from wheats of good and poor bread making quality. J. Cereal Sci. 1995, 22, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dhaka, V.; Khatkar, B.S. Influence of gluten addition on rheological, pasting, thermal, textural properties and bread making quality of wheat varieties. Qual. Assur. Saf. Crops Foods 2015, 7, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, P.; Zhao, W.; Luo, H.; Zhai, Z.; Li, B.; Gou, S. The main quality traits of wheat: Correlation analysis and principal components analysis. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2019, 35, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Duan, J.; Shao, Y.; He, L.; Li, X.; Hou, G.; Li, S.; Feng, W.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xie, Y. Optimizing nitrogen management to achieve high yield, high nitrogen efficiency and low nitrogen emission in winter wheat. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 697, 134088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, M.; Yang, J. Delaying or promoting? Manipulation of leaf senescence to improve crop yield and quality. Planta 2023, 258, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Acreche, M.M.; Slafer, G.A. Variation of grain nitrogen content in relation with grain yield in old and modern spanish wheats grown under a wide range of agronomic conditions in a mediterranean region. J. Agric. Sci. 2009, 147, 657–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Munier-Jolain, N.G.; Salon, C. Are the carbon costs of seed production related to the quantitative and qualitative performance? An appraisal for legumes and other crops. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28, 1388–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hao, T.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, S.; Xu, Y.; Xu, X.; Zhao, C. Effects of drip irrigation and fertilization frequency on yield, water and nitrogen use efficiency of medium and strong gluten wheat in the Huang-Huai-Hai plain of China. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lukow, O.M.; Adams, K.; Suchy, J.; DePauw, R.M.; Humphreys, G. The effect of the environment on the grain colour and quality of commercially grown canada hard white spring wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Snowbird’. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2013, 93, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Matuscadiz, M.A.; Hucl, P.; Perron, C.E.; Tyler, R.T. Genotype × environment interaction for grain color in hard white spring wheat. Crop Sci. 2003, 43, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Oury, F.X.; Brancourthulmel, M.; Depatureaux, C.; Doussinault, G.; Galic, N.; Giraud, A.; Heumez, E.; Lecomte, C.; Pluchard, P.; Rolland, B. Yield and grain protein concentration in bread wheat: A review and a study of multi-annual data from a french breeding program. J. Genet. Breed. 2003, 57, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, S.; Wang, R.j.; Zhang, X.; Wu, W.; Shao, M. Research advancement of wheat nitrogen nutrition and nitrogen transportation in wheat grain filling. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2004, 18, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fuertes-Mendizabal, T.; Aizpurua, A.; Gonzalez-Moro, M.B.; Estavill, J.M. Improving wheat breadmaking quality by splitting the n fertilizer rate. Eur. J. Agron. 2010, 33, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Godfrey, D.; Hawkesford, M.J.; Powers, S.J.; Millar, S.; Shewry, P.R. Effects of crop nutrition on wheat grain composition and end use quality. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 3012–3021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cao, Y.; Zhao, G.; Xin, Y.; Hao, X.; Hu, W.; Yu, D.; Chai, H.; Feng, D.; Pei, J.; Liu, J. Flour blending of weak gluten wheat and its effect on processing quality. J. Triticeae Crops 2022, 42, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Park, H.; Clay, D.E.; Hall, R.G.; Rohila, J.S.; Kharel, T.P.; Clay, S.A.; Lee, S. Winter wheat quality responses to water, environment, and nitrogen fertilization. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2014, 45, 1894–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hao, T.; Qu, W.; Zhao, J.; Deng, X.; Zhang, X.; Li, K.; Xu, X.; Zhao, C. Trends of yield and quality related traits of the wheat varieties released in China from 1991 to 2018. J. Chin. Cereals Oils Assoc. 2023, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, X.; Jiang, L.; Ma, X.; Wang, M.; Cao, Y.; Hao, J.; Zhang, D.; Ji, H. Comprehensive processing quality evaluation of strong gluten wheat basedon principal component analysis. J. Triticeae Crops 2022, 42, 1473–1483. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhou, Y.; Cui, L.; You, X.; Chen, J.; Li, X.; Geng, Q.; Liu, J.; Fang, X. Effect of quinoa flour on the rheological properties of wheat dough and the quality of crisp biscuits. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 47, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Peng, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Yu, Z.; Zeng, J.; Xu, D.; Dong, J.; Ma, W. Wheat quality formation and its regulatory mechanism. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 834654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 12 03974 g001
Figure 1. Effect of nitrogen application by high-frequency versus low-frequency drip irrigation on protein content of medium-gluten and strong-gluten wheat. JM22, JM20, and SL02-1 refer to the medium-gluten wheat variety Jimai22, and the strong-gluten wheats Jimai20 and shiluan02-1, respectively. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Effect of nitrogen application by high-frequency versus low-frequency drip irrigation on protein content of medium-gluten and strong-gluten wheat. JM22, JM20, and SL02-1 refer to the medium-gluten wheat variety Jimai22, and the strong-gluten wheats Jimai20 and shiluan02-1, respectively. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Plants 12 03974 g001
Plants 12 03974 g002
Figure 2. Effect of different frequencies of nitrogen application by drip irrigation on hardness value of medium-gluten and strong-gluten wheat. JM22, JM20, and SL02-1 refer to the medium-gluten wheat variety Jimai22, and the strong-gluten wheats Jimai20 and shiluan02-1, respectively. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Effect of different frequencies of nitrogen application by drip irrigation on hardness value of medium-gluten and strong-gluten wheat. JM22, JM20, and SL02-1 refer to the medium-gluten wheat variety Jimai22, and the strong-gluten wheats Jimai20 and shiluan02-1, respectively. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Plants 12 03974 g002
Plants 12 03974 g003
Figure 3. Effect of different frequencies of nitrogen application by drip irrigation on CIE L*a*b* of medium-gluten and strong-gluten wheat. JM22, JM20, and SL02-1 refer to the medium-gluten wheat variety Jimai22, and the strong-gluten wheats Jimai20 and shiluan02-1, respectively. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Effect of different frequencies of nitrogen application by drip irrigation on CIE L*a*b* of medium-gluten and strong-gluten wheat. JM22, JM20, and SL02-1 refer to the medium-gluten wheat variety Jimai22, and the strong-gluten wheats Jimai20 and shiluan02-1, respectively. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Plants 12 03974 g003
Plants 12 03974 g004
Figure 4. Effect of different frequencies of nitrogen application by drip irrigation on wet/dry gluten content of medium-gluten and strong-gluten wheat. JM22, JM20, and SL02-1 refer to the medium-gluten wheat variety Jimai22, and the strong-gluten wheats Jimai20 and shiluan02-1, respectively. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Effect of different frequencies of nitrogen application by drip irrigation on wet/dry gluten content of medium-gluten and strong-gluten wheat. JM22, JM20, and SL02-1 refer to the medium-gluten wheat variety Jimai22, and the strong-gluten wheats Jimai20 and shiluan02-1, respectively. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Plants 12 03974 g004
Plants 12 03974 g005
Figure 5. Effect of different frequencies of nitrogen application by drip irrigation on sedimentation of medium-gluten and strong-gluten wheat. JM22, JM20, and SL02-1 refer to the medium-gluten wheat variety Jimai22, and the strong-gluten wheats Jimai20 and shiluan02-1, respectively. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Effect of different frequencies of nitrogen application by drip irrigation on sedimentation of medium-gluten and strong-gluten wheat. JM22, JM20, and SL02-1 refer to the medium-gluten wheat variety Jimai22, and the strong-gluten wheats Jimai20 and shiluan02-1, respectively. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Plants 12 03974 g005
Plants 12 03974 g006
Figure 6. Trend of key tensile parameters over time. JM22, JM20, and SL02-1 refer to the medium-gluten wheat variety Jimai22, and the strong-gluten wheats Jimai20 and shiluan02-1, respectively. * indicates a significant difference at p < 0.05 and ** indicates a significant difference at p < 0.01.
Figure 6. Trend of key tensile parameters over time. JM22, JM20, and SL02-1 refer to the medium-gluten wheat variety Jimai22, and the strong-gluten wheats Jimai20 and shiluan02-1, respectively. * indicates a significant difference at p < 0.05 and ** indicates a significant difference at p < 0.01.
Plants 12 03974 g006
Plants 12 03974 g007
Figure 7. Principal component analysis of quality traits of wheat grain and its flour. HV stands for hardness value; PC stands for protein content; WGC means wet gluten content; DGC means dry gluten content; S means sedimentation; L*, a*, and b* represent CIE L*, CIE a*, and CIE b*, respectively; WA stands for water absorption; MC stands for moisture content; DT stands for development time; ST stands for stability time; TI stands for tolerance index; LV-10th stands for lowering value in the 10th minute; WD stands for weakening degree; LV-20th stands for lowering value in the 20th minute; FQC stands for flour quality index; TA stands for tensile area; RVF stands for resistance value at 5 cm; E stands for extensibility; MD stands for maximum drag; SR stands for stretch ratio; MSR stands for maximum stretch ratio.
Figure 7. Principal component analysis of quality traits of wheat grain and its flour. HV stands for hardness value; PC stands for protein content; WGC means wet gluten content; DGC means dry gluten content; S means sedimentation; L*, a*, and b* represent CIE L*, CIE a*, and CIE b*, respectively; WA stands for water absorption; MC stands for moisture content; DT stands for development time; ST stands for stability time; TI stands for tolerance index; LV-10th stands for lowering value in the 10th minute; WD stands for weakening degree; LV-20th stands for lowering value in the 20th minute; FQC stands for flour quality index; TA stands for tensile area; RVF stands for resistance value at 5 cm; E stands for extensibility; MD stands for maximum drag; SR stands for stretch ratio; MSR stands for maximum stretch ratio.
Plants 12 03974 g007
Plants 12 03974 g008
Figure 8. Correlation analysis of quality traits of wheat grain and its flour. HV stands for hardness value; PC stands for protein content; WGC means wet gluten content; DGC means dry gluten content; S means sedimentation; L*, a*, and b* represent CIE L*, CIE a*, and CIE b*, respectively; WA stands for water absorption; MC stands for moisture content; DT stands for development time; ST stands for stability time; TI stands for tolerance index; LV-10th stands for lowering value in the 10th minute; WD stands for weakening degree; LV-20th stands for lowering value in the 20th minute; FQC stands for flour quality index; TA stands for tensile area; RVF stands for resistance value at 5 cm; E stands for extensibility; MD stands for maximum drag; SR stands for stretch ratio; MSR stands for maximum stretch ratio. * denotes significant differences at p ≤ 0.05, ** denotes significant differences at p ≤ 0.01.
Figure 8. Correlation analysis of quality traits of wheat grain and its flour. HV stands for hardness value; PC stands for protein content; WGC means wet gluten content; DGC means dry gluten content; S means sedimentation; L*, a*, and b* represent CIE L*, CIE a*, and CIE b*, respectively; WA stands for water absorption; MC stands for moisture content; DT stands for development time; ST stands for stability time; TI stands for tolerance index; LV-10th stands for lowering value in the 10th minute; WD stands for weakening degree; LV-20th stands for lowering value in the 20th minute; FQC stands for flour quality index; TA stands for tensile area; RVF stands for resistance value at 5 cm; E stands for extensibility; MD stands for maximum drag; SR stands for stretch ratio; MSR stands for maximum stretch ratio. * denotes significant differences at p ≤ 0.05, ** denotes significant differences at p ≤ 0.01.
Plants 12 03974 g008
Table 1. Interaction effects between year, species, and frequency.
Table 1. Interaction effects between year, species, and frequency.
FactorProtein ContentHardness ValueAvg CIE L*Avg CIE a*Avg CIE b*Wet Gluten ContentDry Gluten ContentSedimentation Value
Year**ns*********ns
Variety**ns************
Frequency****************
Year * Variety**************
Year * Frequency*ns*ns*****ns
Variety * Frequencynsnsnsns**ns***
Year * Variety * Frequency*nsnsns*****ns
* indicates a significant difference at p < 0.05, ** indicates a significant difference at p < 0.01, and ns indicates no significant difference.
Table 2. Effect of different frequency of nitrogen application by drip irrigation on flour parameters.
Table 2. Effect of different frequency of nitrogen application by drip irrigation on flour parameters.
YearVarietyDrip
Irrigation Fertilization Frequency		Water Absorption (%)Moisture Content (%)Development Time (min)Stability Time (min)Tolerance IndexLowering Value in the 10th Minute (B·U)Weakening DegreeLowering Value in the 20th Minute (B·U)FQC
JM22DIF454.4 b12.8 a1.4 b1.7 d245.0 a306.0 a331.0 a372.7 a19.5 d
DIF260.1 a12.7 a1.7 b1.9 d262.0 a292.0 a316.7 a362.0 a22.0 d
2021JM20DIF455.8 b10.8 b2.4 ab6.4 c94.0 b134.0 b158.5 b185.7 b45.5 b
DIF251.1 c11.6 ab2.1 b5.8 c103.0 b136.0 b162.5 b203.0 b37.0 c
SL02-1DIF454.0 bc11.6 ab3.9 a9.2 a70.3 c79.7 c139.0 b180.7 b64.7 a
DIF253.5 bc11.6 ab2.5 ab8.0 b60.0 c119.0 b144.0 b200.0 b36.0 c
JM22DIF449.4 ab9.2 b1.9 b3.5 d142.3 a191.3 a211.7 a232.7 a28.7 c
DIF252.1 a10.1 ab2.1 b3.7 d118.7 a158.7 a170.0 b183.7 b34.0 bc
2022JM20DIF452.3 a10.0 ab4.0 a11.5 b48.7 c63.7 bc91.0 cd101.3 cd72.0 a
DIF247.1 b9.0 b2.9 ab8.7 c84.3 b99.7 b116.3 c129.3 c49.0 b
SL02-1DIF449.9 ab9.7 ab3.1 ab18.9 a37.3 c53.3 c59.0 d60.3 d55.7 ab
DIF249.8 ab11.0 a3.0 ab18.8 a33.3 c62.0 bc77.3 d78.0 d49.3 b
Year*****************
Variety*****************
Frequencynsnsns**nsnsnsns**
Year * Varietynsnsns***********
Year * Frequencynsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsns
Variety * Frequency**nsns************
Year * Variety * Frequencyns*ns***nsnsns*
JM22, JM20, and SL02-1 refer to the medium-gluten wheat variety Jimai22, and the strong-gluten wheats Jimai20 and Shiluan02-1, respectively. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. * indicates a significant difference at p < 0.05, ** indicates a significant difference at p < 0.01, and ns indicates no significant difference.
Table 3. Effect of drip irrigation nitrogen application frequency on gluten index of Jimai22.
Table 3. Effect of drip irrigation nitrogen application frequency on gluten index of Jimai22.
YearTreatmentGluten Index (%)
2021DIF480.5 a
DIF286.2 a
2022DIF457.7 b
DIF271.0 a
Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Table 4. Effect of different number of drip irrigation nitrogen applications on stretching parameters of medium-gluten and strong-gluten wheat.
Table 4. Effect of different number of drip irrigation nitrogen applications on stretching parameters of medium-gluten and strong-gluten wheat.
YearVarietyDrip Irrigation Fertilization FrequencyTensile Area (cm2)Resistance Value at 5 cm (B·U)Extensibility (mm)Maximum Drag (B·U)Stretch RatioMaximum Stretch Ratio
2021JM22DIF439.7 bc172.7 d129.0 c200.7 d1.6 e1.6 d
DIF232.0 c178.0 d118.0 d210.7 d1.7 e1.8 d
JM20DIF458.0 b380.7 c97.7 e385.0 c4.0 b4.0 b
DIF257.0 b468.7 a85.0 f468.7 ab5.6 a5.6 a
SL02-1DIF4129.0 a417.3 b165.7 a445.7 b2.6 d3.4 c
DIF2117.0 a419.7 b137.7 b491.7 a3.2 c3.6 c
2022JM22DIF478.0 cd437.0 d118.3 a441.0 d3.7 d3.8 e
DIF273.7 d480.7 d102.7 bc485.0 d4.7 d4.8 de
JM20DIF4107.7 b627.0 c113.0 ab695.7 c5.6 d6.3 d
DIF292.0 c716.3 c91.3 c723.0 c8.0 c8.1 c
SL02-1DIF4147.7 a1044.3 b101.7 bc1111.7 b10.4 b11.0 b
DIF2145.7 a1171.3 a95.7 c1233.3 a12.3 a13.0 a
Year************
Variety************
Frequency***********
Year * Variety***********
Year * Frequencyns*nsns**
Variety * Frequencynsnsnsns*ns
Year * Variety * Frequencynsns**nsnsns
JM22, JM20, and SL02-1 refer to the medium-gluten wheat variety Jimai22, and the strong-gluten wheats Jimai20 and shiluan02-1, respectively. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. * indicates a significant difference at p < 0.05, ** indicates a significant difference at p < 0.01, and ns indicates no significant difference.
Table 5. Irrigation and nitrogen application during the critical fertility period of wheat.
Table 5. Irrigation and nitrogen application during the critical fertility period of wheat.
Amount of Water and Nitrogen FertilizerTreatmentWheat Growth Period
SeedingJointingBootingFloweringFillingTotal
N application (kg·ha−1)DIF49030303030210
DIF29060 60 210
Irrigation volumes (mm)DIF4 30303030120
DIF2 60 60 120
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hao, T.; Chen, R.; Jia, J.; Zhao, C.; Du, Y.; Li, W.; Zhao, L.; Duan, H. Enhancing Wheat Gluten Content and Processing Quality: An Analysis of Drip Irrigation Nitrogen Frequency. Plants 2023, 12, 3974. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12233974

AMA Style

Hao T, Chen R, Jia J, Zhao C, Du Y, Li W, Zhao L, Duan H. Enhancing Wheat Gluten Content and Processing Quality: An Analysis of Drip Irrigation Nitrogen Frequency. Plants. 2023; 12(23):3974. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12233974

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hao, Tianjia, Rong Chen, Jing Jia, Changxing Zhao, Yihang Du, Wenlu Li, Ludi Zhao, and Hongxiao Duan. 2023. "Enhancing Wheat Gluten Content and Processing Quality: An Analysis of Drip Irrigation Nitrogen Frequency" Plants 12, no. 23: 3974. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12233974

APA Style

Hao, T., Chen, R., Jia, J., Zhao, C., Du, Y., Li, W., Zhao, L., & Duan, H. (2023). Enhancing Wheat Gluten Content and Processing Quality: An Analysis of Drip Irrigation Nitrogen Frequency. Plants, 12(23), 3974. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12233974

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop