Next Article in Journal
Optimum Nitrogen, Phosphorous, and Potassium Fertilizer Application Increased Chrysanthemum Growth and Quality by Reinforcing the Soil Microbial Community and Nutrient Cycling Function
Next Article in Special Issue
Multifunctional Adjuvants Affect Sulfonylureas with Synthetic Auxin Mixture in Weed and Maize Grain Yield
Previous Article in Journal
Physiological and Physical Strategies to Minimize Damage at the Branch–Stem Junction of Trees: Using the Finite Element Method to Analyze Stress in Four Branch–Stem Features
Previous Article in Special Issue
Allelopathic Effect of Aqueous Extracts of Grass Genotypes on Eruca Sativa L.
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 23
10.3390/plants12234061
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Post-Emergence Water-Dispersal Application Provides Equal Herbicidal Activity against Echinochloa crus-galli and Rice Safety as Foliar Spraying of Penoxsulam

by
Jinqiu Sun
1,
Xiaoyue Yu
1,
Hongxing Xu
2,
Yongjie Yang
1,
Mengjie Liu
1,
Yanchao Zhang
3,
Yongliang Lu
1 and
Wei Tang
1,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology and Breeding, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 311400, China
2
Institute of Plant Protection and Microbiology, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China
3
School of Information Science and Enzhegineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(23), 4061; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12234061
Submission received: 25 October 2023 / Revised: 30 November 2023 / Accepted: 1 December 2023 / Published: 3 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Weed Management II)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Penoxsulam is an acetolactate synthase (ALS)-inhibiting herbicide usually applied by post-emergence foliar spraying (PFS) for the control of Echinochloa crus-galli and numerous annual weeds in paddy fields. Herbicides applied by foliar spraying can have negative impacts on the environment, ecosystems, and human health. In this study, the response of E. crus-galli and rice to the PFS and post-emergence water-dispersal (PWD) applications of penoxsulam, and the differences in the detoxification displayed by them between the two treatment methods were compared. The results showed that the PWD application of penoxsulam provides a similar control efficacy against E. crus-galli as PFS at the 1-, 3-, and 5-leaf stages. Meanwhile, the PWD application had a higher safety for the rice. After being treated with 30 g a.i. ha−1 penoxsulam, residues were not detected in the rice treated by the PWD application method, whereas, with the PFS treatment, there was 59.0 µg/kg penoxsulam remaining. With the PFS application, there were many more residues of penoxsulam in the E. crus-galli than with the PWD method; the amount of residues was 32-fold higher 12 h after treatment. The in vitro enzyme activity assays revealed that the activities of ALS, glutathione-S-transferase (GST), and cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (P450) were increased in the PWD treatments, and were 1.5-, 1.3-, and 2.3-fold higher than with PFS 72 h after treatment. The real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) revealed that the GST1 and P450 genes, CYP81A14, CYP81A12, CYP81A18, and CYP81A21 were upregulated with the PWD application versus PFS in the E. crus-galli. In summary, these results demonstrate that the herbicidal activity was not affected by the upregulation of target and metabolic enzyme activities with the PWD application of penoxsulam. This research could contribute to application strategies reducing the risk of rice injury and environmental impacts by using water-dispersal formulations of penoxsulam.

1. Introduction

Herbicides are widely used in weed management because they provide better weed control, reduce labor costs, and do not alter the soil structure. However, the incorrect use of herbicides promotes the development of weed resistance and has a negative influence on environmental protection. Penoxsulam (2-(2,2-Difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8-dimethoxy-[1,2,4] triazolo [1,5-c] pyrimidin-2-yl)-6-(trifluoromethyl) benzenesulfonamide) is a triazolopyrimidine sulfonamide (TSA) herbicide developed by Dow AgroSciences and applied in paddy fields. It inhibits the activity of acetolactate synthase (EC 4.1.3.18, ALS), which catalyzes the first reaction in the biosynthesis of branched-chain amino acids (isoleucine, leucine, and valine), and provides excellent herbicidal activity against annual grass weeds such as Echinochloa crus-galli, broadleaf weeds, and sedges in rice [1]. As of January 2022, a total of 337 penoxsulam products (including technical and formulations) have been registered in China according to the China Pesticide Registration Watch (CPRW). It is used mainly as a post-emergence foliar spray formulation. However, aerial spraying directly applies herbicides on crop seedlings, which may cause crop seedling injury. Previous studies have shown that the foliar application of penoxsulam negatively affects the roots and leaves of the seedlings of some rice varieties [2]. On the other hand, herbicide aerial spraying may result in the drift to neighboring areas, thus possessing a high risk of drift injury and environmental contamination [3]. It is also reported that sub-lethal doses of herbicides from spray drift may lead to the resistance evolution of weeds [4], through which Lolium rigidum [5,6,7], Raphanus raphanistrum [8], and Amaranthus palmeri [9] have evolved herbicide resistance under the selective pressure of low-dose herbicides over a long period of time. In addition, sublethal doses of herbicides affect non-target flowering plants [10].
Compared with foliar spraying, water-dispersal formulations, such as “1 kg granule”, “diffusion granule”, “Jumbo”, and “Flowable” have been developed to avoid drift problems and save farmers the trouble of applying herbicides [11]. In China, there are 19 granular products registered among 238 formulations of penoxsulam. The entry route is different for herbicides applied by water-dispersal and foliar spraying. The leaf absorption of herbicide after spraying requires the active ingredient to be retained in the leaf and remain there for a sufficient time until it is absorbed. This process was influenced by factors such as the spray equipment [12], spray drops characteristics [13,14], and plant leaf surface characteristics [15,16,17]. When the herbicide is applied using post-emergence water-dispersal formulations, the absorption of the herbicide may occur through the stem after being dissolved in the water, and the active ingredient can then be translocated to the apical meristem.
With the wide use of mechanical rice transplanters, the timing of rice seedling transplanting has shifted from the 4- to 6-leaf stage (grown seedlings) to the 2- to 3-leaf stage (young seedlings). As a result, an extended period of time is needed for the creation of shade by the standing rice seedlings, causing the prolonged requirement of weed control [11]. E. crus-galli is one of the most prevalent and troublesome weed species in rice production in China, which can cause as much as an 80% rice yield reduction if uncontrolled [18,19]. Since E. crus-galli has morphologic similarities to rice, and along with its extended emergence throughout the growing season, high photosynthetic capacity, and prolific seed production, this makes it highly competitive and hard to control in paddy fields [20]. Penoxsulam can be absorbed through both the leaf and stem of plant seedlings; the herbicidal activity and rice safety between the different application methods of penoxsulam have yet to be identified.
To achieve better weed control efficacy, a specific field environment is required to coordinate with the herbicide application [21,22,23]; for instance, the field needs to maintain a certain water depth when applied with water-dispersal formulated herbicides, and be kept drained for foliar spraying herbicides. When water layers are kept in the field, weeds have to adapt their metabolism in order to avoid energy shortage. The difference in herbicide metabolism has been identified and the genes responsible have been cloned in Echinochloa species such as CYP81A68 [24], CYP81A12, and CYP81A21 [25]. When treated with the same dose of herbicide using different application methods, in conditions where water is involved, insight into the different herbicide responses in E. crus-galli is lacking.
Previous studies have mostly concentrated on the weed control efficacy evaluation of different penoxsulam formulations or combinations [26], or have either focused on the resistance level and molecular mechanism of penoxsulam [27,28,29] in Echinochloa species, or the environmental effects of penoxsulam [30]. Understanding how penoxsulam is absorbed and translocated in E. crus-galli and rice plants after being treated with different application methods, and how penoxsulam influences the target and key metabolic enzymes and their genes in E. crus-galli, is a key step toward the effective post-emergence application of penoxsulam using water-dispersal formulations. In this study, rice and E. crus-galli seedlings at the same growth stage were divided into two groups, kept in moist soil or 2 cm deep water, and then treated with penoxsulam either by foliar spraying or water-dispersal, respectively. The objectives of this study were to (a) investigate the response to penoxsulam in rice and E. crus-galli seedlings; (b) determine the variation in the absorption and metabolism of penoxsulam in E. crus-galli and rice; (c) determine the differences in the enzyme activity of ALS, GST, and P450, and the expression of the ALS, GST, and P450s genes in E. crus-galli using qRT-PCR under the two application methods of penoxsulam.

2. Results

2.1. Dose–Response Experiments to Penoxsulam by PFS and PWD Application

The effect of the penoxsulam in E. crus-galli at the 1- to 5-leaf stage applied using two application methods was evaluated. Obvious yellowing was observed on the young leaves of the E. crus-galli 5 d after treatment (DAT) with PFS, followed by stunted growth and wilting at 10 DAT. Similar symptoms were observed 2 days later with the PWD treatments. The results of the whole-plant dose–response assay indicated that the PWD application was as effective as the PFS application in controlling the E. crus-galli at the 1-, 3-, and 5-leaf stages (Figure 1). As shown in Figure 2a, penoxsulam at the recommended field dose of 30 g a.i. ha−1 controlled 100% of the E. crus-galli at the 1-leaf stage after the two application methods. Penoxsulam with the PWD and PSF application at 7.5, 15, and 30 g a.i. ha−1 caused a more than 90% fresh weight reduction in the E. crus-galli at the 3-leaf stage (Figure 2b). The control efficacy of the PFS and PWD application methods, as determined by an ED50s value of 1.3 and 1.4, respectively, for the E. crus-galli at the 5-leaf stage, is illustrated in Figure 2c.

2.2. Effects of Two Application Methods on Growth of Rice

After 21 days of the penoxsulam treatment, the above-ground fresh weight of the rice was assessed to evaluate the safety of the two application methods on the rice. There was found visible damage to the rice at the seedling stage growth. The inhibition rate of the herbicide on the above-ground fresh weight of the rice gradually decreased with the growth of the rice seedlings. At the 1-leaf stage, the application of 30 g a.i. ha−1 penoxsulam through the PFS and PWD methods resulted in an inhibition rate of 50.4% and 42.7%, respectively, while, at the 5-leaf stage, it reached 31.6% and 27.6%. Furthermore, at 15 and 30 g a.i. ha−1, the fresh weight inhibition rate using the PWD method consistently remained lower than that using the PFS method at all three leaf stages (Table 1), indicating a higher safety of the PWD method compared with the PFS method at the recommended field doses.

2.3. Differences in Residues of Penoxsulam in Rice and E. Crus-Galli after PFS and PWD Treatments

The absorption of penoxsulam in the rice and E. crus-galli was evaluated by assaying the residues at 12, 24, 72, and 120 h after treatment. No residues of penoxsulam were detected in the rice treated with the PWD method at doses of 7.5 and 30 g a.i. ha−1. However, even at the low dose (7.5 g a.i. ha−1), 17.0 ug/kg penoxsulam residues could be detected in the rice after treatment with the PFS method at 12 h post-treatment. After treatment with the PFS method, the residue levels peaked in the E. crucis-galli after only 12 h, before decreasing over time. However, the residue levels remained significantly higher than those observed following treatment with the PWD method in both the rice and E. crucis-galli seedlings. The level of residual penoxsulam found within the E. crucis-galli was approximately 5.4-fold greater than that found within the rice when using the PFS method 12 h after treatment (Table 2).

2.4. Acetolactate Synthase (ALS), Cytochrome P450s (P450), and Glutathione S-Transferases (GST) Activity Assay

The results revealed that, in the absence of herbicide treatment, there was no significant disparity in the ALS and GST activity between the PFS and PWD methods; however, the P450 activity of the PWD method exhibited higher levels compared to that of the PFS method. In the E. crus-galli, after treatment with the PFS method, the peak activities of ALS, P450, and GST were observed at 24 h. Conversely, for the PWD method, the ALS and P450 enzyme activities reached their peak at 72 h, while the GST activity continued to increase over time. Notably, except for 24 h post-treatment, all three enzymes’ activities were higher following the PWD treatment than those resulting from the application of the PFS method (Figure 3). These results suggested a potential association between the differences in the peak ALS activity and the variations in the symptom presentation timing caused by the different methods employed. Moreover, the elevated levels of both the P450 and GST activity may be attributed to their involvement in herbicide metabolism.

2.5. Expression Analysis of ALS Gene and Metabolism-Related Genes

The trend of ALS gene expression following the penoxsulam treatment was consistent between both methods, with the expression levels being upregulated and reaching a peak at 12 h post-treatment. Specifically, the expression levels were 27.0 and 27.7 times higher than those of the control in the PFS and PWD methods, respectively (Figure 4a). Moreover, the magnitude of the change in gene expression was greater for the PFS method compared to the PWD method. The expression levels of the GST1 and CYP81A14 genes exhibited an upward trend at 12 h after treatment, with the PFS method reaching its peak at 24 h and the PWD method peaking at 72 h. Notably, the gene expression levels were higher in the PWD method compared to the PFS method. However, there was no significant difference observed in the GST1 gene expression between these two methods (Figure 4b). In contrast, the CYP81A14 gene expression level in the E. crus-galli was significantly higher after the treatment with the PWD method compared to the PFS method at both 24 and 72 h post-treatment (Figure 4c). Furthermore, metabolism-related genes (CYP81A12, CYP81A18, and CYP81A21) also exhibited higher expression levels 24 h after treatment using the PWD method compared to the PFS method (Figure 4d).

3. Discussion

E. Crus galli is one of the most troublesome weeds in rice fields around the world due to its strong competitiveness, high reproductive capacity, and wide ecological adaptability [18]. The post-emergence application method for herbicides adopted by most farmers for the control of E. crus-galli in China is spraying. After the deposition of the droplet containing penoxsulam on the plant leaves, the surface characteristics, shape, and orientation of the target leaves are considered important factors for the retention and amount of herbicide absorption. The cuticle layer, apoplast, cell wall, and membrane are barriers on the way to the meristematic tissue, where ALS activity is inhibited by penoxsulam. Compared with water-dispersal application, in which herbicides are absorbed by the stem of young plants, foliar spraying has a larger contact area and shorter translocation distance. It is hypothesized that the foliar spraying of penoxsulam may show a higher control efficacy on E. crus-galli than water dispersal. The results of this study showed that there is no significant difference between the efficacy of the water-dispersal and foliar spraying of penoxsulam. It is probable that the young seedling stem has a less developed cuticle, devoid of a wax layer, making plant more permeable to penoxsulam [31]. Unexpectedly, but not surprisingly, it was noted that, after 21 days of treatment, foliar spraying caused a higher above-ground fresh weight reduction in the rice seedlings at all three treated leaf ages than the water-dispersal treatments.
In the current study, much less remaining penoxsulam was detected in both the rice and E. crus-galli seedlings treated by water-dispersal than foliar spraying at the same dose. When herbicides are applied to water, the dissolved active ingredients and active ingredients bound to soil particles can accumulate in rice field sediments. Penoxsulam is a non-volatile compound; the adsorption reached equilibrium after 4 h in paddy soil, and the adsorption coefficients were related to the soil pH [32,33]. Moreover, the dissipation time of penoxsulam in water is relatively short; 45~55% of the initial dose dissipates 6 h after treatment [34]. It is also reported that only 12.8% and 10% of the penoxsulam is detected 2 days after 0.07 mg/kg was mixed with soil [35]. It is clear that a sufficient lethal dose could have been absorbed and translocated to the meristematic tissues of the E. crus-galli when the penoxsulam was applied by water-dispersal methods.
Our results indicated that, under foliar spray application, the uptake of the penoxsulam was much higher in the E. crus-galli than the rice. This may be due to the wax content on the surface of the E. crus-galli and rice leaves. Previous studies have pointed out that the area covered by pesticides on the plant surface is negatively correlated with the wax content [36], and that the wax content of E. crus-galli leaves is much higher than that of rice [37]. These results suggested that the water-dispersal application of penoxsulam has a minor impact on the water and soil environment, or the safety for subsequent crops. Therefore, it is clear that post-emergence water-dispersal application methods or formulations are practical strategies for the application of penoxsulam in rice.
Plants have a strong metabolic detoxification capacity for ALS-inhibiting herbicides, and this rapid detoxification metabolism may be possessed by the plant itself or induced subsequently [38]. After herbicide treatment, the ALS and GST activities and their related gene expression levels in the E. crus-galli showed a tendency to increase and then decrease, which was observed in this study. The increase in the metabolic enzyme activity was similar to the findings that the enzymes ALS [28] and GST [39] are involved in the increased metabolic detoxification after treatment with ALS inhibitors in E. crus-galli. Compared with the PFS treatment, the activities of ALS and GST reached their peak later than with the PWD treatment; this was inconsistent with the symptoms of obvious herbicidal injury being observed 2 days later with the PWD treatments. The relative higher activity of GST in the PWD treatment may due to the flooding conditions during the experiment, which caused a GST-involved stress response in the E. crus-galli. Further, we found that the ALS and GST1 genes were upregulated in the PWD treatment relative to the PFS treatment. Previous studies have shown that the upregulation of the GST2 gene in E. crus-galli [40], the GST genes in Alopecurus aequalis [41], and the GSTDHAR2 and MGST1 genes in Malachium aquaticum [42] was identified to be associated with herbicide metabolic resistance. The direct evidence that the PWD treatment with penoxsulam triggered higher GST and ALS activities than the PFS treatment needs further study.
Plant P450s constitute one of the largest families of protein genes involved in metabolizing varied biotic and abiotic xenobiotics including herbicides, decreasing their phytotoxocity [43]. A considerable number of CYP450 genes have been reported to be involved in non-target site resistance to varied herbicides in different weed species. For instance, CYP76C1, CYP76C2, and CYP76C4 can metabolize phenylurea herbicides [44], and CYP81A12 and CYP81A21 can metabolize penoxsulam and bensulfuron [45]. The CYP81 family has only been reported in grass species. Dimmano et al. [46] reported that CYP81A12, CYP81A14, and CYP81A21 could metabolize penoxsulam via O-demethylated in E. phyllopogon. Similarly, the over-expression of CYP81A68 in E. crus-galli, was identified to confer metabolic resistance to penoxsulam [24]. Our present work provided the first evidence that the expression of CYP81A14, CYP81A12, CYP81A18, and CYP81A21 were higher after the water-dispersal treatment than after the foliar spraying of penoxsulam in E. crus-galli seedlings. The higher expression of the CYP81 genes may contribute to the rapid metabolism of penoxsulam, which could be the result of the relatively lower herbicidal activity against E. crus-galli in the water-dispersal treatments.
The relationship between flooding stress and the expression of the CYP81 genes was not examined in this current study. We hypothesized that it might be that the flooding conditions, in which the water layers were kept during the water-dispersal treatments, induced higher enzyme activity and gene expression levels. There are few studies reporting on the relationship of flooding stress and the activities of ALS, GST, P450s and the related gene expression levels in weeds. However, previous studies have found that the GSTase-related genes in alfalfa [47] and cucumber [48], and the genes encoding the P450 proteins are upregulated under waterlogging stress. As the E. crus-galli could be totally controlled with 30 g a.i./ha of penoxsulam before the 5-leaf stage, and there were no significant differences between the ED50s of the PWD and PFS methods, this may justify its relatively lower herbicidal activity at the same dose in the PWD method.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Seeds of E. crus-galli were collected in a rice field in Baimi town, Taizhou city, Jiangsu province, China (E120.258, N32.514), in 2019. Rice seeds (variety XIU SHUI 134) were provided by the Seed Bank of the China National Rice Research Institute (CNRRI). The seeds used for the experiments were disinfected with 3% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min, and then washed three times with distilled water. The seeds were placed in 9 cm diameter Petri dishes containing two layers of filter paper (Double Ring #102, Hangzhou Special Paper Industry Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China), and moistened by 4 mL of distilled water. The Petri dishes were transferred into a controlled environment growth incubator (GXZ-300C, Dongnan Instrument Manufacture, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China) at day and night temperatures of 30/20 °C with 12 h light. The photoperiod was set to coincide with the high temperature period. A total of 10 uniform germinating seeds (with 2 mm emerged radicles) were sown on the surface in plastic pots (13.5 cm diameter, 11.0 cm height) containing potting soil (Hangzhou Jin Hai Agriculture Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China). After sowing, the seeds were covered with a thin layer of soil and moisture was maintained by irrigating with an overhead sprinkler every day. After seedlings emerged, seedlings were thinned to three plants in each pot, with three replicates for each treatment. These pots were placed in a greenhouse at CNRRI (E119.935, N30.078), where the temperature was kept at 25/15 °C, and the humidity was higher than 50% under natural light.
When the plants grew to 1-, 3- and 5-leaf stage, seedlings were treated with the commercial formulation of penoxsulam (2.5% OD, Corteva Agriscience, Shanghai, China) by two methods: (1) post-emergence foliar spraying (PFS): seedlings were sprayed using a laboratory sprayer equipped with a flat-fan nozzle (TP6501E) to deliver 200 L ha−1 at 230 kPa; (2) post-emergence water-dispersal (PWD): penoxsulam was diluted and added using a pipette into each pot kept in 2 cm deep water.

4.2. Dose–Response Experiments to Penoxsulam by PFS and PWD Application

To investigate the response of E. crus-galli and rice to penoxsulam at different growth stages under the two application methods mentioned above, whole-plant dose–response experiments were conducted in the greenhouse. The treatment doses of penoxsulam were 0, 0.24, 0.48, 0.96, 1.88, 3.75, 15, and 30 g a.i. ha−1 for rice and E. crus-galli seedlings at 1- and 3-leaf stages, and 0, 0.94, 1.88, 3.75, 7.5, 15, 30, 60, 120 g a.i. ha−1 for seedlings at 5-leaf stage. The soil was maintained as wet for PFS treatments and kept in 2 cm deep water for PWD treatments throughout the experiments. After 3 weeks of treatment, the number of surviving seedlings and fresh weight of above-ground material of each E. crus-galli and rice plant was harvested, and fresh weight was recorded.

4.3. Penoxsulam Absorption in E. crus-galli Using HPLC-Q-TOF-MS

When plants reached 3-leaf stage, they were treated with the two application methods at 7.5 g a.i. ha−1 of penoxsulam. The above-ground tissues were harvested at 12, 24, 72, 120 h after treatment. Treated plants were washed three times with distilled water to remove unabsorbed penoxsulam. The water on the surface of the plants was blotted out with filter paper, placed in liquid nitrogen for quick freezing, and then stored at −80 °C until use. A total of 5 g of above-ground tissue was used for each replicate and three replicates were used for analysis. Frozen plant material was ground into a powder using a mortar and pestle in liquid nitrogen. The extraction and isolation of penoxsulam was performed as described previously [49]. Both treatment groups were analyzed using ultra performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) according to Pan et al. [24] and Feng et al. [39].

4.4. In Vitro Assay of ALS, GST, and Cytochrome P450 Activities in E. crus-galli

To determine the effects of the two application methods on the activities of target enzyme ALS, or key metabolic enzyme GST and P450 of E. crus-galli, seedlings were cultivated to 3-leaf stage as described above. Seedlings were treated with penoxsulam at 7.5 g a.i. ha−1 and 2 g fresh leaf tissue was collected at 0, 12, 24, 72, and 120 h after treatment. The leaf tissue was treated with PBS prior to biochemical assays after being ground with liquid nitrogen. A fresh leaf sample (0.1 g) was homogenized with 0.9 mL of PBS [100 mmol/L Tris-HCl, (pH 8.3), 300 mmol/L glycerinum, 5 mmol/L DTT, 2 mmol/L EDTA, 0.5 mmol/L PMSF, and 0.01% (v/v) Triton X-100] at pH 7.2–7.4 and centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected in a centrifuge tube and placed in an ice bath. Activities of ALS, GST, and P450 were determined by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (Meimian Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Yancheng, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each treatment included three replications, and the experiment was repeated once.

4.5. ALS, GST, and Cytochrome P450 Gene Expression Analysis in E. crus-galli

The above-ground tissues of plants treated with the two application methods at the 3- or 4-leaf stage were harvested at 0, 12, 24, 72, and 120 h after treatment. Total RNA was extracted by using the RNAprp Pure Plant Extraction Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China). The cDNA synthesis kit (TAKARA, Beijing China) was then used to reverse transcribe the RNA samples. qRT-PCR was performed with an iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) on the QuantStudioTM 1 real-time PCR System and with the following thermal cycle conditions: denaturing at 95 ◦C for 120 s followed by 40 cycles of 95 ◦C for 15 s and 60 ◦C for 15 s. ALS [50], GST1, CYP81A12, CYP81A14, CYP81A18, and CYP81A21 [39] were amplified using published primers (Table 3). There were three replicates for each treatment, and the relative expression was calculated using the 2(−∆∆C(T))method [51].

4.6. Statistical Analysis

ED50 values (50% plant mortality due to herbicides) were estimated by nonlinear regression analysis using origin software (Version 2018). In this experiment, the response curve of weed above-ground biomass to the penoxsulam dose was fitted to a four-parameter logistic model (1) [52].
y = C + D − C 1 + ( x / E D 50 ) b
here, C refers to the lower limit of plant survival at the maximum herbicide dose, and D is the upper limit of plant survival at doses close to the control treatment. x is the dose of the herbicide, b represents the relative slope of x (the dose that reduces the above-ground fresh weight by 50%). y is the percentage of fresh weight of plants in the treatment group to the fresh weight of plants in the control group. After 21 days of treatment, the above-ground fresh weight of rice was measured and the fresh weight inhibition rate was calculated according to Equation (2).
E / % = W 1 − W 2 W 1 × 100
here, E is the fresh weight inhibition rate, %; W1 is the fresh weight of rice in control group (g); W2 is the fresh weight of rice in treatment group (g). Significant differences of inhibition rate of rice fresh weight, ALS, P450 and GST enzyme activity and gene expression data were determined by the t-test (α = 0.05). Significant differences of remaining penoxsulam data were determined by one-way ANOVA, Duncan test (p < 0.05).

5. Conclusions

In summary, compared to foliar spraying, penoxsulam showed a similar efficacy against the E. crus-galli via water-dispersal application. Furthermore, as a result of less penoxsulam remaining in the rice seedlings, the post-emergence water-dispersal application method might be safer than the foliar spraying of penoxsulam in rice. The enzyme activities of ALS, GST, CYP450, as well as their related gene expression levels were up-regulated in the PWD treatments; there were no significant differences between the ED50s of the PWD and PFS applications of penoxsulam. In China, the environmental pollution and human health problems caused by herbicide spraying have attracted public attention, and understanding the efficacy of penoxsulam via water dispersal is necessary to explore its application scope. As such, the environmental impacts of penoxsulam spraying could be reduced by using non-spraying tactics.

Author Contributions

J.S.: conceptualization, investigation, and manuscript writing and editing. X.Y., Y.Y. and M.L.: formal analysis and investigation. H.X., Y.Z. and Y.L.: writing—review. W.T.: funding acquisition, conceptualization, investigation, draft designing and revising, supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LGN21C140003), the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-01), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32071508), and the Rice Pest Management Research Group of the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

Data Availability Statement

The data will be made available on request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Jie Chen for her valuable suggestions on preparing the manuscript drafts.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Jabusch, T.W.; Tjeerdema, R.S. Partitioning of penoxsulam, a new sulfonamide herbicide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 7179–7183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Willingham, S.D.; Mccauley, G.N.; Senseman, S.A.; Chandler, J.M.; Richburg, J.S.; Lassiter, R.B.; Mann, R.K. Influence of flood interval and cultivar on rice tolerance to penoxsulam. Weed Technol. 2008, 1, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, G.; Han, Y.; Li, X.; Andaloro, J.; Chen, P.; Hoffmann, W.C.; Han, X.; Chen, S.; Lan, Y. Field evaluation of spray drift and environmental impact using an agricultural unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 737, 139793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Benedetti, L.; Rangani, G.; Ebeling Viana, V.; Carvalho-Moore, P.; Merotto, A., Jr.; Rabaioli Camargo, E.; Antonio de Avila, L.; Roma-Burgos, N. Rapid Reduction of Herbicide Susceptibility in Junglerice by Recurrent Selection with Sublethal Dose of Herbicides and Heat Stress. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Busi, R.; Neve, P.; Powles, S. Evolved polygenic herbicide resistance in Lolium rigidum by low-dose herbicide selection within standing genetic variation. Evol. Appl. 2013, 6, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Busi, R.; Powles, S.B. Evolution of glyphosate resistance in a Lolium rigidum population by glyphosate selection at sublethal doses. Heredity 2009, 103, 318–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Neve, P.; Powles, S. High survival frequencies at low herbicide use rates in populations of Lolium rigidum result in rapid evolution of herbicide resistance. Heredity 2005, 95, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ashworth, M.B.; Walsh, M.J.; Flower, K.C.; Powles, S.B. Recurrent selection with reduced 2,4-D amine doses results in the rapid evolution of 2,4-D herbicide resistance in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum L.). Pest Manag. Sci. 2016, 72, 2091–2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tehranchian, P.; Norsworthy, J.K.; Powles, S.; Bararpour, M.T.; Bagavathiannan, M.V.; Barber, T.; Scott, R.C. Recurrent Sublethal-Dose Selection for Reduced Susceptibility of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) to Dicamba. Weed Sci. 2017, 65, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Strandberg, B.; Sørensen, P.B.; Bruus, M.; Bossi, R.; Dupont, Y.; Link, M.; Damgaard, C. Effects of glyphosate spray-drift on plant flowering. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 280, 116953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Watanabe, H. Development of lowland weed management and weed succession in Japan. Weed Biol. Manag. 2011, 11, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, C.; Zeng, A.; He, X.; Song, J.; Herbst, A.; Gao, W. Spray drift characteristics test of unmanned aerial vehicle spray unit under wind tunnel conditions. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2020, 13, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Butler Ellis, M.; Webb, D.A.; Western, N.M. The effect of different spray liquids on the foliar retention of agricultural sprays by wheat plants in a canopy. Pest Manag. Sci. 2004, 60, 786–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Song, M.; Hu, D.; Zheng, X.; Wang, L.; Yu, Z.; An, W.; Na, R.; Li, C.; Li, N.; Lu, Z.; et al. Enhancing Droplet Deposition on Wired and Curved Superhydrophobic Leaves. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 7966–7974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Xiao, S.; Liu, Y. Influence of leaf surface wettability on droplet deposition effect of rape leaves and their correlation. J. Agric. Food Res. 2019, 1, 100011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, C.; Wu, T.; Wu, Y.; Gao, Y.; Du, F. Improved Method to Characterize Leaf Surfaces, Guide Adjuvant Selection, and Improve Glyphosate Efficacy. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 1348–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sanyal, D.; Bhowmik, P.C.; Reddy, K.N. Influence of leaf surface micromorphology, wax content, and surfactant on primisulfur on droplet spread on barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crusgalli) and green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Sci. 2006, 54, 62–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kraehmer, H.; Jabran, K.; Mennan, H.; Chauhan, B.S. Global distribution of rice weeds—A review. Crop Prot. 2016, 80, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, T.; Yu, J.; Fang, J.; Dong, L. Rice safety and control of penoxsulam resistant and susceptible barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crusgalli) populations with soil-applied herbicides. Weed Technol. 2021, 35, 492–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ye, C.Y.; Tang, W.; Wu, D.; Jia, L.; Qiu, J.; Chen, M.; Mao, L.; Lin, F.; Xu, H.; Yu, X.; et al. Genomic evidence of human selection on Vavilovian mimicry. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 3, 1474–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Saudy, H.S.; El Metwally, I.M.; Shahin, M.G. Co–application effect of herbicides and micronutrients on weeds and nutrient uptake in flooded irrigated rice: Does it have a synergistic or an antagonistic effect? Crop Prot. 2021, 149, 105755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. El-Metwally, I.M.; Saudy, H.S. Interactive Application of Zinc and Herbicides Affects Broad-leaved Weeds, Nutrient Uptake, and Yield in Rice. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2021, 21, 238–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Saudy, H.S. Chlorophyll meter as a tool for forecasting wheat nitrogen requirements after application of herbicides. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2014, 60, 1077–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pan, L.; Guo, Q.; Wang, J.; Shi, L.; Yang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Yu, Q.; Bai, L. CYP81A68 confers metabolic resistance to ALS and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides and its epigenetic regulation in Echinochloa crusgalli. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 428, 128225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Iwakami, S.; Uchino, A.; Kataoka, Y.; Shibaike, H.; Watanabe, H.; Inamura, T. Cytochrome P450 genes induced by bispyribac-sodium treatment in a multiple-herbicide-resistant biotype of Echinochloa phyllopogon. Pest Manag. Sci. 2014, 70, 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xu, Y.; Zhao, H.; Zhao, L.; Hou, J. Synergistic effect and field efficacy of penoxsulam mixed with diflufenican against weeds in transplanted rice. Chin. J. Pestic. Sci. 2022, 24, 812–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fang, J.; Yang, D.; Zhao, Z.; Chen, J.; Dong, L. A novel Phe-206-Leu mutation in acetolactate synthase confers resistance to penoxsulam in barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crusgalli (L.) P. Beauv). Pest Manag. Sci. 2022, 78, 2560–2570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, X.; Ma, H.; Yang, X.; Zhang, J.; Lu, X.; Tang, W. Resistance mechanism of Echinochloa crusgalli to penoxsulam in the rice field in Ningxia province. Plant Prot. Sci. 2022, 48, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fang, J.; Liu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Dong, L. Target Site–Based Penoxsulam Resistance in Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crusgalli) from China. Weed Sci. 2019, 67, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, D.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, C.; Hou, K.; Wang, X.; Zhu, L.; Li, B.; Du, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, J. Effects of ecotoxicity of penoxsulam single and co-exposure with AgNPs on Eisenia fetida. Chemosphere 2022, 307, 136134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Stagnari, F. A review of the factors influencing the absorption and efficacy of lipophilic and highly water-soluble post-emergence herbicides. Eur. J. Plant Sci. Biotechnol. 2007, 1, 22–35. [Google Scholar]
  32. Alister, C.A.; Araya, M.A.; Kogan, M. Adsorption and desorption variability of four herbicides used in paddy rice production. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 2011, 46, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jabusch, T.W.; Tjeerdema, R.S. Microbial degradation of penoxsulam in flooded rice field soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 5962–5967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kogan, M.; Araya, M.; Alister, C. Water and sediment dynamics of penoxsulam and molinate in paddy fields: Field and lysimeter studies. Pest Manag. Sci. 2012, 68, 399–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tsochatzis, E.D.; Tzimou-Tsitouridou, R.; Menkissoglu-Spiroudi, U.; Karpouzas, D.; Katsantonis, D. Laboratory and field dissipation of penoxsulam, tricyclazole and profoxydim in rice paddy systems. Chemosphere 2013, 91, 1049–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Xu, L.; Zhu, H.; Ozkan, H.E.; Bagley, W.E.; Krause, C.R. Droplet evaporation and spread on waxy and hairy leaves associated with type and concentration of adjuvants. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 842–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Liao, H.; Chen, Y.; Shen, X. Difference and cause of appressorium formation of Exserohilum monoceras on epicuticular wax from Oryza sativa. J. Nanjing Agric. Univ. 2015, 38, 727–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Siminszky, B. Plant cytochrome P450-mediated herbicide metabolism. Phytochem. Rev. 2006, 5, 445–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Feng, T.; Peng, Q.; Wang, L.; Xie, Y.; Ouyang, K.; Li, F.; Zhou, H.; Ma, H. Multiple resistance mechanisms to penoxsulam in Echinochloa crusgalli from China. Pestic. Biochem. Phys. 2022, 187, 105211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, T.; Yan, B.; Li, J.; Dong, L. Target-Site and Metabolic Resistance Mechanisms to Penoxsulam in Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crusgalli (L.) P. Beauv). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 8085–8095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhao, N.; Yan, Y.; Luo, Y.; Zou, N.; Liu, W.; Wang, J. Unravelling mesosulfuron-methyl phytotoxicity and metabolism-based herbicide resistance in Alopecurus aequalis: Insight into regulatory mechanisms using proteomics. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 670, 486–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bai, S.; Liu, W.; Wang, H.; Zhao, N.; Jia, S.; Zou, N.; Guo, W.; Wang, J. Enhanced Herbicide Metabolism and Metabolic Resistance Genes Identified in Tribenuron-Methyl Resistant Myosoton aquaticum L. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 9850–9857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Nelson, D.; Werck Reichhart, D. A P450-centric view of plant evolution. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2011, 66, 194–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Höfer, R.; Boachon, B.; Renault, H.; Gavira, C.; Miesch, L.; Iglesias, J.; Ginglinger, J.-F.; Allouche, L.; Miesch, M.; Grec, S.; et al. Dual Function of the Cytochrome P450 CYP76 Family from Arabidopsis thaliana in the Metabolism of Monoterpenols and Phenylurea Herbicides. Plant Physiol. (Bethesda) 2014, 166, 1149–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Iwakami, S.; Endo, M.; Saika, H.; Okuno, J.; Nakamura, N.; Yokoyama, M.; Watanabe, H.; Toki, S.; Uchino, A.; Inamura, T. Cytochrome P450 CYP81A12 and CYP81A21 Are Associated with Resistance to Two Acetolactate Synthase Inhibitors in Echinochloa phyllopogon. Plant Physiol. 2014, 165, 618–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Dimaano, N.G.; Yamaguchi, T.; Fukunishi, K.; Tominaga, T.; Iwakami, S. Functional characterization of cytochrome P450 CYP81A subfamily to disclose the pattern of cross-resistance in Echinochloa phyllopogon. Plant Mol. Biol. 2020, 102, 403–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zeng, N.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Hu, L.; Chen, L. Comparative Transcriptome Combined with Proteome Analyses Revealed Key Factors Involved in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Response to Waterlogging Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Xu, X.; Chen, M.; Ji, J.; Xu, Q.; Qi, X.; Chen, X. Comparative RNA-seq based transcriptome profiling of waterlogging response in cucumber hypocotyls reveals novel insights into the de novo adventitious root primordia initiation. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yasuor, H.; Osuna, M.D.; Ortiz, A.; Saldaín, N.E.; Eckert, J.W.; Fischer, A.J. Mechanism of Resistance to Penoxsulam in Late Watergrass [Echinochloa phyllopogon (Stapf) Koss.]. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 3653–3660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, J.; Fang, J.; Dong, L. Analysis of the resistance level and its mechanism of barnyard grass Echinochloa oryzoides population HJHL-715 to penoxsulam. J. Plant Prot. 2020, 47, 197–204. [Google Scholar]
  51. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Seefeldt, S.S.; Jensen, J.E.; Fuerst, E.P. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol. 1995, 9, 218–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 12 04061 g001
Figure 1. Photographs of barnyard grass after 21 days of treatment with different doses of penoxsulam by post-emergence foliar spraying (PFS) and water-dispersal application (PWD). The first, second, and third rows represent E. crus-galli at 1- (first row), 3- (second row), and 5-leaf stages (third row), respectively.
Figure 1. Photographs of barnyard grass after 21 days of treatment with different doses of penoxsulam by post-emergence foliar spraying (PFS) and water-dispersal application (PWD). The first, second, and third rows represent E. crus-galli at 1- (first row), 3- (second row), and 5-leaf stages (third row), respectively.
Plants 12 04061 g001
Plants 12 04061 g002
Figure 2. Dose–response curve of E. crus-galli at 1-leaf stage (a), 3-leaf stage (b) and 5-leaf stage (c) at different doses of penoxsulam by post-emergence foliar spraying (PFS) and water-dispersal application (PWD). Each point represents the mean ± SE of twice-repeated experiments, each including three replicates.
Figure 2. Dose–response curve of E. crus-galli at 1-leaf stage (a), 3-leaf stage (b) and 5-leaf stage (c) at different doses of penoxsulam by post-emergence foliar spraying (PFS) and water-dispersal application (PWD). Each point represents the mean ± SE of twice-repeated experiments, each including three replicates.
Plants 12 04061 g002
Plants 12 04061 g003
Figure 3. Activity of ALS (a), P450 (b), and GST (c) at 0, 12, 24, 72, and 120 h after treatment with penoxsulam by post-emergence foliar spraying (PFS) and water-dispersal application (PWD). Each point refers to mean ± SE of twice-repeated experiments, each including three replicates. The significance between the two methods was detected by t-tests (** p < 0.01).
Figure 3. Activity of ALS (a), P450 (b), and GST (c) at 0, 12, 24, 72, and 120 h after treatment with penoxsulam by post-emergence foliar spraying (PFS) and water-dispersal application (PWD). Each point refers to mean ± SE of twice-repeated experiments, each including three replicates. The significance between the two methods was detected by t-tests (** p < 0.01).
Plants 12 04061 g003
Plants 12 04061 g004
Figure 4. The gene expression levels of ALS (a), GST1 (b), and CYP81A14 (c) at different time intervals, and the relative gene expression levels of CYP81A12, CYP81A18, and CYP81A21 after 24 h treatment by post-emergence foliar spraying (PFS) and water-dispersal application (PWD) of penoxsulam treatment (d). Data are presented as mean ± SE; significant differences between the two methods were detected by t-tests (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 4. The gene expression levels of ALS (a), GST1 (b), and CYP81A14 (c) at different time intervals, and the relative gene expression levels of CYP81A12, CYP81A18, and CYP81A21 after 24 h treatment by post-emergence foliar spraying (PFS) and water-dispersal application (PWD) of penoxsulam treatment (d). Data are presented as mean ± SE; significant differences between the two methods were detected by t-tests (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Plants 12 04061 g004
Table 1. Fresh weight inhibition rate in rice at recommended field doses.
Table 1. Fresh weight inhibition rate in rice at recommended field doses.
Treat TargetDose (g a.i.ha−1)Inhibition Rate of Rice Fresh Weight ± SE(%)p-Value
PFSPWD
1-leaf-stage rice1538.3 ± 7.328.0 ± 6.50.299
3050.4 ± 0.942.7 ± 7.00.313
3-leaf-stage rice1531.5 ± 9.023.5 ± 6.00.424
3047.0 ± 2.736.5 ± 3.20.024
5-leaf-stage rice1529.0 ± 5.617.1 ± 4.60.150
3031.6 ± 4.927.6 ± 1.30.454
Data refer to mean ± SE and values were the means of three replicates. PFS and PWD stand for post-emergence foliar spraying and water-dispersal application of penoxsulam, respectively. p-value for the inhibition rate of the two application methods at the same dose was determined by t-tests.
Table 2. Remaining penoxsulam in barnyard grass and rice was determined by HPLC- MS/MS analysis at 12, 24, 72, and 120 h after treatment.
Table 2. Remaining penoxsulam in barnyard grass and rice was determined by HPLC- MS/MS analysis at 12, 24, 72, and 120 h after treatment.
TargetDose (g a.i.ha−1)MethodRemaining Penoxsulam (µg/kg)
12 h24 h72 h120 h
Rice7.5PFS17.0 ± 5.7 a4.0 ± 5.7 b4.0 ± 5.7 b0.0 ± 0.0 b
PWDNDNDNDND
30PFS59.0 ± 5.7 a39.5 ± 2.5 b39.0 ± 6.0 b20.5 ± 3.5 c
PWDNDNDNDND
E.crus-galli7.5PFS21.5 ± 2.5 a20.0 ± 0.6 a13.5 ± 1.5 b0.0 ± 0.0 c
PWDNDNDNDND
30PFS320.0 ± 20.0 a76.0 ± 9.1 b34.0 ± 4.2 c29.7 ± 4.4 c
PWD10.3 ± 0.3 c11.7 ± 0.9 c16.5 ± 1.5 b20.3 ± 1.2 a
ND means penoxsulam was not detected by UPLC- MS/MS. The data represent the means ± SE. Different letters indicate significant differences in different time groups according to one-way ANOVA, Duncan’s test, p < 0.05.
Table 3. PCR primers for qPCR gene expression level analysis.
Table 3. PCR primers for qPCR gene expression level analysis.
PrimerSequence (5′–3′)References
β-actin-FTTGCCTACATTGCCCTTGACTA(Iwakami et al. 2014 [25])
β-actin-SGAACCACCACTGAGGACGACA
ALS-FTGGGGCTATGGGATTTGGTTGenBank, KY071206.1
ALS-RGCACAAAGACCTTCACTGGG
GST1-FAACGCAATGGCAGGTCTGAAGenBank, JX122857.1
GST1-RTACCGTTGTGGATGAGCACG
CYP81A12-FCACCCGGAGAAGCTCAAAAGGenBank, AB818461
CYP81A12-RATGATGCTCTGGAGGTAGCC
CYP81A14-FAAGAACGACCTCCCCCATCTGenBank, AB733994
CYP81A14-RGGATGGCATACGCATTGACG
CYP81A18-FATGCCATTCGGGATGGGAAGGenBank, AB733996
CYP81A18-RAGAGCTTCCAAAGGGACGAC
CYP81A21-FCAACCTGTGGGACTACCTGCGenBank, AB818462
CYP81A21-RGCACGGCAATCATGCTCTTC
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, J.; Yu, X.; Xu, H.; Yang, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, Y.; Tang, W. Post-Emergence Water-Dispersal Application Provides Equal Herbicidal Activity against Echinochloa crus-galli and Rice Safety as Foliar Spraying of Penoxsulam. Plants 2023, 12, 4061. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12234061

AMA Style

Sun J, Yu X, Xu H, Yang Y, Liu M, Zhang Y, Lu Y, Tang W. Post-Emergence Water-Dispersal Application Provides Equal Herbicidal Activity against Echinochloa crus-galli and Rice Safety as Foliar Spraying of Penoxsulam. Plants. 2023; 12(23):4061. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12234061

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Jinqiu, Xiaoyue Yu, Hongxing Xu, Yongjie Yang, Mengjie Liu, Yanchao Zhang, Yongliang Lu, and Wei Tang. 2023. "Post-Emergence Water-Dispersal Application Provides Equal Herbicidal Activity against Echinochloa crus-galli and Rice Safety as Foliar Spraying of Penoxsulam" Plants 12, no. 23: 4061. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12234061

APA Style

Sun, J., Yu, X., Xu, H., Yang, Y., Liu, M., Zhang, Y., Lu, Y., & Tang, W. (2023). Post-Emergence Water-Dispersal Application Provides Equal Herbicidal Activity against Echinochloa crus-galli and Rice Safety as Foliar Spraying of Penoxsulam. Plants, 12(23), 4061. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12234061

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop