Next Article in Journal
Drought-Stress-Induced Changes in Chloroplast Gene Expression in Two Contrasting Strawberry Tree (Arbutus unedo L.) Genotypes
Next Article in Special Issue
A Biostimulant Based on Silicon Chelates Enhances Growth and Modulates Physiological Responses of In-Vitro-Derived Strawberry Plants to In Vivo Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Biochar Applied in Either Rice or Wheat Seasons on the Production and Quality of Wheat and Nutrient Status in Paddy Profiles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multifarious Characterization and Efficacy of Three Phosphate-Solubilizing Aspergillus Species as Biostimulants in Improving Root Induction of Cassava and Sugarcane Stem Cuttings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biostimulatory Effects of Chlorella fusca CHK0059 on Plant Growth and Fruit Quality of Strawberry

1
Division of Applied Life Science (BK21), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea
2
Institute of Agriculture and Life Science (IALS), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea
3
Organic Agriculture Division, National Academy of Agriculture Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2023, 12(24), 4132; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12244132
Submission received: 22 November 2023 / Revised: 9 December 2023 / Accepted: 10 December 2023 / Published: 11 December 2023

Abstract

:
Green algae have been receiving widespread attention for their use as biofertilizers for agricultural production, but more studies are required to increase the efficiency of their use. This study aimed to investigate the effects of different levels of Chlorella fusca CHK0059 application on strawberry plant growth and fruit quality. A total of 800 strawberry seedlings were planted in a greenhouse and were grown for seven months under different Chlorella application rates: 0 (control), 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4% of the optimal cell density (OCD; 1.0 × 107 cells mL−1). The Chlorella application was conducted weekly via an irrigation system, and the characteristics of fruit samples were monitored monthly over a period of five months. The growth (e.g., phenotype, dry weight, and nutrition) and physiological (e.g., Fv/Fm and chlorophylls) parameters of strawberry plants appeared to be enhanced by Chlorella application over time, an enhancement which became greater as the application rate increased. Likewise, the hardness and P content of strawberry fruits had a similar trend. Meanwhile, 0.2% OCD treatment induced the highest values of soluble solid content (9.3–12 °Brix) and sucrose content (2.06–2.97 g 100 g−1) in the fruits as well as fruit flavor quality indices (e.g., sugars:acids ratio and sweetness index) during the monitoring, whilst control treatment represented the lowest values. In addition, the highest anthocyanin content in fruits was observed in 0.4% OCD treatment, which induced the lowest incidence of grey mold disease (Botrytis cinerea) on postharvest fruits for 45 days. Moreover, a high correlation between plants’ nutrients and photosynthetic variables and fruits’ sucrose and anthocyanin contents was identified through the results of principal component analysis. Overall, C. fusca CHK0059 application was found to promote the overall growth and performance of strawberry plants, contributing to the improvement of strawberry quality and yield, especially in 0.2% OCD treatment.

1. Introduction

Over the past century, inorganic fertilizers have been indispensable for improving crop production and quality, thereby ensuring food security in the face of a rapidly growing global population [1]. In addition, the chemical fertilizers used in agricultural lands, along with pesticides and herbicides, are judged to have, to date, met the stability of global food production to some extent [2,3]. However, excessive use of these agrochemicals has caused severe adverse impacts on the natural environments: e.g., soil acidification, mineral depletion, disease incidence, heavy metal contamination, eutrophication, biodiversity loss, and global warming [1,4,5], thereby exacerbating soil quality and health and subsequently reducing crop yield. In turn, these harmful effects, caused by chemical abuse, raise public concerns about food safety and security worldwide [6]. Hence, eco-friendly approaches to the improvement of crop yield and quality as well as efficiency in land management should be explored for sustainable agriculture.
Biofertilizers are substances containing microorganisms (e.g., bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and algae) or organic additives containing natural compounds derived from the microbes that promote plant growth and development by increasing the supply of essential nutrients (e.g., N, P, K, etc.) to the host plants [7]. It has been estimated that the application of biofertilizers may reduce the use of N–P–K fertilizers by up to 60% but increase crop yield by 35% [8]. Additionally, recent studies have demonstrated the superior effects of biofertilizer application on promoting the plant’s resistance to pathogens and abiotic stresses [9,10] as well as improving soil structure and water retention capacity [11]. Moreover, the fact that it is eco-friendly and cost-effective is increasing the global interest in biofertilizer development and production, mainly in the USA, Europe, China, and India. Accordingly, as of 2022 the global biofertilizer market was valued at US$2.15 billion and is projected to grow to US$6.83 billion in 2032, at a compound annual growth rate of 12.3% from 2023 to 2032 [12].
The major biofertilizer types include symbiotic (e.g., Rhizobium) or non-symbiotic (e.g., Azotobacter) N fixers, P solubilizing bacteria (e.g., Aspergillus, Penicillium), mycorrhizae (e.g., Glomus, Scutellospora), plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPR; e.g., Agrobacterium, Pseudomonas), vermicompost, cyanobacteria, etc. [2,4,13,14]. Among these, rhizobia-based biofertilizers account for approximately 80% of the global demand, followed by phosphate-mobilizing biofertilizers (approximately 15%) [15,16]. Albeit less frequent in agricultural use than these microbes, algae containing amino acids, fibers, plant nutrients, vitamins, and antioxidants [7,17] have also been reported for their high potential as biofertilizers. According to the results of many studies, the application of algae extracts considerably increased the yield and quantity of various crops and fruits, including maize, tomato, lettuce, spinach, chives, grape, mango, etc. via foliar or soil applications [18,19,20,21,22]. In addition, it has been confirmed that the algae applications induce enhancement of plant tolerances to pathogen attacks and abiotic stresses (e.g., salinity, drought, etc.), contributing to the promotion of the plant’s survival and performance [23].
In South Korea, freshwater algae, i.e., Chlorella spp., have been attracting great attention for their application to some leafy vegetables and strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa) since the mid-2010s. According to a report by the Rural Development Administration (RDA) [24], as of 2020 Chlorella farming practices were being applied to 66 crops and to a cultivation area of approximately 3700 ha. Additionally, it was estimated that farm income has increased by about 20% through Chlorella application. Kim et al. [25] revealed that the application of the Chlorella vulgaris CHK0008 strain to two strawberry cultivars, such as ‘Seolhyang’ and ‘Yukbo’, via soil irrigation or foliar treatment led to an increase in soluble solid content and a decrease in the decay rate of strawberry fruits. In addition, the beneficial effects induced by Chlorella fusca CHK0059, such as promoting the growth of strawberry plants and suppressing the Fusarium wilt disease of the fruits were reported [26]. Likewise, the role of Chlorella spp. as a biofertilizer and biocontrol agent has also been demonstrated in other studies [27,28,29]. As such, and based on these positive effects, Chlorella fertilization is widely used in the strawberry industry in Korea, though there is a lack of mechanism studies on the effects of Chlorella application on strawberry growth and fruit quality through monitoring experiments. Here, we aimed to investigate the application effects of Chlorella fusca CHK0059 on the morphological and physiological traits of strawberry plants and the quality and antifungal ability of the fruits. Then, through a comprehensive result analysis, we attempted to identify key factors in the beneficial effects of Chlorella fertilization and reveal their interactions.

2. Results

2.1. Plant Characteristics

2.1.1. Plant Biomass and Nutrient Content

The growth of strawberry plants varied greatly with Chlorella application rates, as shown in Figure 1A. The stem length and leaf size appeared to be greater as the application rate increased. Consistent with this trend, the highest dry weight (DW) of strawberry plants was observed in 0.4% of the optimal cell density (OCD; 1.0 × 107 cells mL−1) treatment (15.5 g plant−1; Figure 1B). The DW values were significantly greater in 0.2% and 0.4% OCD treatments (1.57 and 1.72 times, respectively) than control (p < 0.05).
It was found that the higher the Chlorella application rate, the higher the nutritional level of strawberry plants. Among the nutrients, N, P, and K in the plant shoots were highest at 0.4% OCD (21, 6.4, and 30 g kg−1, respectively), while 0.2% OCD represented the highest concentrations of Ca (8.1 g kg−1), significantly higher than those in control (p < 0.05; Figure 1C). Additionally, the highest values of nutrients in the plant roots were observed in 0.2% and 0.4% OCD treatments for K and P, respectively (Figure 1D).

2.1.2. Photosynthetic Rate and Pigments

Table 1 shows the difference in the photosynthetic properties of plant leaves according to the Chlorella application rates. The maximum photosystem II quantum yield (Fv/Fm) was significantly higher in 0.2% and 0.4% OCD than in control (p < 0.05). In addition, chlorophyll (Chl) parameters, such as Chl a, Chl b, and total Chl, showed significantly higher values in 0.4% OCD than in control (p < 0.05). The carotenoid contents in the three OCD treatments (2.26–2.41 mg 100 g−1) were significantly higher than that in control (1.92 mg 100 g−1) (p < 0.05).

2.2. Fruit Characteristics during the Monitoring Period

2.2.1. Hardness, Soluble Solids Content, and Biomass

The properties of strawberry fruits monitored during the five months (from December 2021 to April 2022) are shown in Figure 2. Fresh weights (FW) of the fruits sampled over the period were highest in the 0.2% OCD (18.9–21.7 g plant−1) and 0.4% OCD (18.8–21.3 g plant−1) treatments, significantly greater than those in control (15.7–20.1 g plant−1; p < 0.05; Figure 2A). For hardness, the greatest values were observed in the fruits sampled in 0.4% OCD (4.8–5.7 N) during the cultivation period, excluding February, which were significantly higher than those in control (4.0–4.5 N; p < 0.05; Figure 2B). In addition, the highest soluble solid content (SSC) values were found mostly in 0.2% OCD (9.3–12.0 °Brix) and 0.4% OCD (9.3–11.9 °Brix), significantly higher than those in control (7.9–10.9 °Brix; p < 0.05; Figure 2C). The most significant difference (approximately 1.23 fold) in the SSC values was found between 0.2% OCD and control treatments, particular in the final month.

2.2.2. Nutrients

Among the Chlorella application rates, 0.4% OCD treatment had the highest concentrations of P (6.97–8.04 g kg−1) in fruit samples over the five months (Table 2). Other Chlorella treatments induced intermediate concentrations of P (4.74–6.32 g kg−1), and control treatment had the lowest P concentration (3.51–5.09 g kg−1). Meanwhile, Ca concentration in the fruits showed the opposite trend; the highest value was observed mostly in control while 0.4% OCD had the lowest value. For other nutrients (Mg and K), it seemed that there was no significant difference in the concentrations among the treatments (p > 0.05) across the whole cultivation period.

2.2.3. Sugars

The highest contents of total sugars (TS) in strawberry fruits sampled in December 2021 and January 2022 were observed in 0.2% OCD (5.6–5.9 g 100 g−1), and were significantly higher than those in control (2.8–4.3 g 100 g−1) (p < 0.05; Figure 3A). On the other hand, in the remaining months, TS content in the fruits sampled in control represented the highest value (6.5 g 100 g−1) in March and the intermediate values (5.3–5.8 g 100 g−1) in February and April. Over the period, the lowest TS values were observed in 0.4% OCD (3.7–4.6 g 100 g−1).
The main types of sugar in strawberry fruits cultivated in control were fructose (41%), glucose (31%), and sucrose (27%). Meanwhile, the fruits harvested in 0.2% and 0.4% OCD treatments contained sucrose (43%), fructose (40%), and glucose (27%) in that order (Figure 3). Among these, sucrose contents were highest in 0.2% OCD across the whole cultivation period, significantly higher (34–66%) than those in control (p < 0.05; Figure 3B). Fructose and glucose contents were highest in control from February to April, and were significantly higher than those in 0.4% OCD (p < 0.05; Figure 3C,D).

2.2.4. Organic Acids

The highest content of total organic acids (TOA) in strawberry fruits sampled in December 2021 was observed in 0.1% OCD (6.52 mg g−1) and was significantly higher than that in control (p < 0.05; Figure 4A). Over the next three months, TOA content in the fruits gradually increased in all Chlorella treatments, but there were no significant differences among the treatments (p > 0.05). TOA content in control then increased considerably (by approximately 23%) in April 2022 relative to the previous month, whereas this phenomenon did not occur in the remaining treatments. At this time, the TOA contents in the fruits were highest in control (9.8 mg g−1) and were significantly higher than those in the 0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.4% OCD treatments (6.6–8.0 mg g−1; p < 0.05).
Overall, the main organic acids in strawberry fruits were found to be citric acid (60–75%), malic acid (25–40%), and acetic acid (<1%). For citric acid, the highest value was observed in the 0.1% OCD treatment in December 2021 while the control treatment represented the highest value in April 2022 (Figure 4B). The remaining organic acids also showed a similar trend (Figure 4C,D). Consistently, these organic acids were found to be significantly lower (23–37%) in the 0.2% and 0.4% OCD treatments than in control (p < 0.05). Temporal changes in citric and malic acids appeared to be similar to TOA content, but not for acetic acid, which tended to drop highly in the third month of sampling.

2.2.5. Fruit Flavor Quality

The highest sugar–organic acid (S:A) ratio of strawberry fruits was observed in 0.2% OCD (8.47–9.99) during the five month sampling period (Table 3). The lowest S:A ratio was found in control (5.26–7.49) in December, January, and April, while 0.4% OCD represented the lowest S:A ratio (5.77–6.83) in the remaining months. Likewise, the sweetness index (SI) of the fruits also showed a similar trend. The treatment of 0.2% OCD induced the highest SI values (8.76–10.0) in December, January, and April and these were significantly greater than those in control (4.59–8.75; p < 0.05).

2.2.6. Correlations of Fruit Properties

The correlations among the properties of fruits sampled in the second and fifth months, when there was the least damage from climate change and disease outbreaks during strawberry cultivation, are shown in Figure 5. At the early sampling (January 2022; Figure 5A), there were significant positive correlations of the fruits’ FW with hardness, P, TS, sucrose, and glucose (r = 0.45, 0.59, 0.54, 0.60, and 0.49, respectively, p < 0.05). In addition, SSC (°Brix) had a significant positive correlation with hardness (r = 0.73, p < 0.05) and negative correlations with P, Mg, and K (r = −0.49, −0.54, and −0.53, respectively, p < 0.05). Among sugar-related parameters, sucrose was significantly correlated to TOA, citric acid, TS, fructose, and glucose (r = 0.41, 0.42, 0.86, 0.60, and 0.54, respectively, p < 0.05). As an indicator of fruit flavor quality, the S:A ratio was significantly correlated to FW, TS, sucrose, fructose, and glucose (r = 0.51, 0.77, 0.76, 0.53, and 0.50, respectively, p < 0.05).
On the other hand, the correlation trends among the variables of fruits sampled in April 2022 were different (Figure 5B). There was a significant positive correlation between fruit’s FW and SSC (r = 0.80, p < 0.001), but both variables had significant negative correlations with organic acids (r = −0.43 to −0.73, p < 0.05). In addition, the parameters related to sugars showed different correlations with organic acids: positive for fructose and glucose (r = 0.47 to 0.71, p < 0.05) and negative for sucrose (r = −0.46 to −0.56, p < 0.05). Sucrose was also negatively correlated with Mg, Ca, and K (r = −0.51, −0.73, and −0.50, respectively, p < 0.05). Moreover, the S:A ratio was positively correlated with FW, hardness, SSC, TS, and sucrose (r = 0.60, 0.49, 0.68, and 0.75, respectively, p < 0.01) but negatively correlated with organic acids (r = −0.60 to −0.66, p < 0.001). In contrast, the SI value showed a positive correlation with TOA and citric acid (r = 0.45, p < 0.05).

2.3. Anthocyanin Content

Figure 6 shows the difference in anthocyanin content in strawberry fruits depending on Chlorella application rates. The highest anthocyanin content was observed in 0.4% OCD (27 mg 100 g−1), followed by the 0.2% OCD, 0.1% OCD, and control (13 mg 100 g−1) treatments. Compared with control, the anthocyanin contents in the fruits of the 0.2% and 0.4% OCD treatments were significantly higher (1.7 and 2.1 times, respectively) than that in control (p < 0.05).

2.4. Postharvest Disease Incidence

As a result of the postharvest fruit storage test, no occurrence of grey disease incidence caused by Botrytis cinerea was found in strawberries during the first two weeks (Figure 7). Twenty-five days after the storage, the pathogen was first observed on the surface of fruits in the control and 0.1% OCD treatments, and the disease incidence in both treatments increased sustainably until the last day (Day 45) of the storage test. Over the storage duration, the final incidences of grey disease according to the Chlorella application rates were listed in the following order: control (85%), 0.1% OCD (57%), 0.2% OCD (13%), and 0.4% OCD (8%) treatments.

2.5. Principal Component Analysis

A clear separation of Chlorella treatments was confirmed through the principal component analysis (PCA) result of the dataset for plant and fruit properties (Figure 8). Along the PC1 axis (48% variance), the treatments with different OCD levels were separated primarily due to variables of plant physiology (e.g., DW, chlorophyll, carotenoid, and Fv/Fm) and nutrients (e.g., N and P) as well as fruit quality, such as SSC, FW, hardness, components (e.g., sucrose, organic acids, S:A ratio, and anthocyanins), and disease incidence (p < 0.01). Along the PC2 axis (15% variance), the treatments were split by the sweetness index, Mg and Ca in the plants, and fructose and glucose in the fruits (p < 0.01). The overall trend of this multivariate analysis indicates that Chlorella application at the level of 0.2% OCD induced the most positive impacts on the major variables of plant growth and fruit quality, as well as their significant correlations.

3. Discussion

In modern agriculture, microalgae have been widely used as biofertilizers, biostimulants, and biopesticides because they contain essential sources of nutrients (e.g., N, P, K, etc.), primary and secondary metabolites (e.g., polysaccharides, phenolics, phytohormones, vitamins, etc.), and bioactive compounds to various environmental conditions (e.g., antimicrobial, antioxidant, antiviral or antifungal substances) [31], thereby improving soil fertility and quality and crop yield and performance. As such, in the present study, the improvements in growth performance and nutrient uptake efficiency of strawberry plants by Chlorella application were confirmed through increased biomass and nutrient contents (Figure 1) and stimulated photosynthetic activity and pigmentation (Table 1). According to our previous analysis of C. fusca CHK0059 cell composition, it contained high levels of N (91.2 g kg−1), P (9.38 g kg−1), K (2.62 g kg−1), Ca (1.05 g kg−1), Mg (5.85 mg kg−1), etc., inferring that added Chlorella is likely to be well absorbed as a nutrient source for strawberry plants. In addition, the improved nutritional status of the plants appeared to positively influence the photosynthetic capacity by regulating their morphological characteristics, such as specific leaf area and leaf mass ratio, that are highly related to the efficiencies of light capture and carbon gain [32,33]. A similar research result has also been reported by Kim et al. [26], who demonstrated significant increases in shoot height, leaf thickness, and leaf pigments of the strawberry cultivar ‘Seolhyang’ by C. fusca CHK0059 application. Moreover, the promoting effect on plant growth performance by microalgae application has been reported in various crops, such as wheat, rice, maize, lettuce, tomato, cabbage, etc., as reviewed in Lee and Ryu [23] and Çakirsoy et al. [34].
Strawberry is one of the most popular fruits in the world because of its sweetness, fragrant flavor, juicy texture, and health-promoting compounds and fibers [35], so it is currently considered a high-value fruit crop that is important for agriculture and local economies, especially in South Korea. With the high demand for better-tasting, longer-lasting, and healthier fruits from consumers, various agricultural technologies including Chlorella fertilization, have been applied to strawberry cultivation. In this respect, the application of C. fusca CHK0059 (0.2% and 0.4% OCD) in the present study led to considerable increases in the SSC (°Brix), hardness, and biomass of strawberry fruits throughout the entire cultivation (Figure 2), suggesting its superior role in the improvement of fruit quality and yield. Additionally, positive correlations of fruit SSC and hardness with P concentrations in roots, shoots, and fruits may (Figure 8) indicate that highly absorbed P in plant shoots and edible parts following Chlorella application also affected the fruit quality parameters. In general, phosphorus is an important macronutrient for photosynthesis and affects sugar partition and transportation as a form of phosphate (Pi) [36]. In this context, the improvement of P status in strawberry roots and shoots following Chlorella application seems to significantly stimulate the overall photosynthetic functions (see Table 1), contributing to an increase in sugar accumulation in fruits with high P.
In general, fruit flavor is determined by the quantity and type of sugars, organic acids, and volatile compounds. A good balance of these substances will meet the consumer preference; however, among these, sugars corresponding to the sweetness intensity of fruits are the most significant determinant. In ripe strawberries, the predominant soluble sugars are sucrose, fructose, and glucose, and the content and composition of these have a decisive effect on determining fruit quality [37] but vary with genotypes, development stages, farming practices, and environmental conditions [38]. In this study, the sugar type that responded most positively to Chlorella application during strawberry cultivation was sucrose (Figure 3). Sucrose is known to be the ultimate product of photosynthesis. This carbohydrate is converted from all photo-assimilates that are not required for leaf function and transported into sink organs, i.e., roots, shoots, and fruits, through the phloem, leading to coordinating physiological growth and development [39]. The amount of sucrose that can be released from the sources to the receptacle fruit sink via long-distance transport depends on various factors: e.g., photosynthetic activity, partitioning between starch synthesis within the chloroplast and triose-Pi moved out of the chloroplast for sucrose synthesis, and temporary storage of sucrose in the vacuole [37,40,41]. In our findings, a significant correlation of sucrose in fruits with Fv/Fm, chlorophylls, carotenoids, and P in leaves (Figure 8) suggests that the application of C. fusca CHK0059 could act as a promoter for fruit flavor as well as for plant growth by increasing photosynthetic efficiency and Pi availability, which are highly related to the sucrose synthesis. Additionally, increased N, Mg, and K contents in the strawberry plants treated with C. fusca (Figure 1) seem to promote overall metabolic processes, including photosynthesis, pigmentation, and carbohydrate accumulation in the leaves, subsequently facilitating the sucrose generation and transport into the sink organ [41]. On the other hand, fructose and glucose contents in the fruits showed similar responses to technological (i.e., Chlorella application rate) and temporal changes, but these were negatively correlated to sucrose content in the fruits (Figure 5 and Figure 8). A similar result has also been observed by Schwieterman et al. [38]. In addition, the S:A ratio as a taste index was positively correlated with sucrose but not with other sugars in the fruits (Figure 5B), suggesting that the increased sucrose content following Chlorella application led to an improvement in the overall strawberry flavor intensity. Furthermore, Schwieterman et al. [38] have reported a high correlation between sucrose and total volatiles, relevant to fruit aroma, in 35 strawberry cultivars. In light of this, in the present study we expect that Chlorella application probably also led to an improvement in total volatile substances, which will increase consumer choice.
Besides sweetness, sourness is also a crucial factor in determining strawberry fruit flavor associated with organic acids [30]. In general, organic acids can mediate various functions in plant growth and development by supporting photosynthesis and stomata regulation as well as acting as an alternative energy source, in turn, the metabolic processes contribute to fruit development and quality [42,43]. Additionally, they also play an important role in the gelling properties of pectin in fruit [44]. In the present study, we found an increase in TOA contents, mainly citrate and malate, in the strawberry fruits treated with C. fusca CHK0059 (Figure 4), inferring that Chlorella-induced organic acids induced benefits not only for plant development but also for development, maturation, and ripening of strawberries [42]; however, such an effect was represented during the initial two or three months but not the remaining period. The qualitative and quantitative variations of organic acids are usually dependent on cultivars, genotypes, and maturation stages of strawberry fruits [45]. Additionally, the difference in accumulation of these organic acids in the fruits may also be attributed to environmental fluctuations, including temperature, ambient CO2, and water and mineral supplies, during the cultivation experiment [46]. Despite the biochemical variation in strawberry fruits, and considering that 0.2% OCD of C. fusca CHK0059 led to the highest values of two indices, i.e., S:A ratio and SI, during the entire cultivation period (Table 3), it seems that the effect of Chlorella-induced sugar production on the fruit flavor quality far outweighed the effect on organic acid production in this study.
It is known well that anthocyanins are responsible for the red color in strawberries and also serve as health-promoting substances with antioxidant, anticancer, and anti-inflammatory properties [47], thus directly affecting fruit appearance and consumer choice. In the present study, like sucrose, the most noticeably improved fruit parameter with the application of C. fusca CHK0059 was anthocyanins, which tended to increase with increasing application rate (Figure 6). Similarly, Roussos et al. [48] have reported that the application of brown alga (Ascophyllum nodosum) extract induced a higher content of anthocyanins in strawberry cv. Camarosa. As is widely known, the accumulation of anthocyanins in fruits is affected by sucrose because it not only provides the energy source for the synthesis of anthocyanins but also acts as a signaling molecule inducing transcription of key enzymes (e.g., G6PHD, SKDH, PAL, C4H, 4CL, etc.) related to the biosynthesis pathway [49,50]. In addition to that evidence, the stimulatory effects of sucrose on the biosynthesis of anthocyanins have been documented in various plant species, including strawberries [49,50], grapes [51], broccoli sprouts [52], etc. Likewise, in this study, we found a high correlation between anthocyanins and sucrose contents in the strawberry fruits (Figure 8).
Typically, strawberries consisting of soft tissue are highly susceptible to the attacks of pathogens, including viruses, bacteria, fungi, and nematodes, especially during postharvest storage [47,53]. Among pathogens, the ascomycete B. cinerea is regarded as the primary disease of strawberries, causing a significant economic loss in the global strawberry industry. In contrast with such fruit disease damage, the application of C. fusca CHK0059 used in this study induced a marked antifungal effect on the postharvest strawberry fruits (Figure 7). Considering the PCA result that showed a significant negative correlation between anthocyanins and disease incidence in fruits (Figure 8), increased anthocyanin accumulation in fruits with the application of C. fusca CHK0059 appeared to have acted as an antifungal factor that effectively suppressed the occurrence of grey mold disease during the postharvest storage test. Likewise, reduced susceptibility to postharvest fungal pathogens, including B. cinerea, has been reported in other fruits enriched in anthocyanins: grapes [54], mango [55], and tomato [56]. In plants, anthocyanins are produced with other classes of flavonoids, e.g., flavones, flavonols, and tannins, via the same biochemical pathway [57]. Among these defensive secondary compounds, tannins can function to protect plants from both abiotic (e.g., cold, light, etc.) and biotic (e.g., pathogens and herbivores) stresses, and they share the same precursors, i.e., leucoanthocyanins, in the biosynthesis pathway with anthocyanins [54,57,58]. Therefore, it can be assumed in this study that the Chlorella application resulted in a simultaneous increase in these two metabolites in strawberry fruits, consequently enhancing the defensive capacity of the postharvest fruits to pathogen attacks. In addition to pathogen resistance, anthocyanin-induced tolerance of postharvest fruits to oxidative stress generally caused by wound and senescence may delay the pathogen infection and development [56].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chlorella Inoculation

For Chlorella inoculation, Chlorella fusca CHK0059 was provided by the Organic Agriculture division of the National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA in South Korea. The Chlorella cells were placed into commercial mineral water (Ca—25 mg L−1; Na—5.3 mg L−1; K—1.6 mg L−1; Mg—3.0 mg L−1) and cultured at the level of optimal cell density (1.0 × 107 cells mL−1) recommended by the RDA [24]. The Chlorella inoculation was conducted in a greenhouse of the experimental farm during the strawberry cultivation, and the culturing conditions were as follows: temperature (25 ± 3 °C), natural sunlight-dependent, and continuous air supply.

4.2. Plant Cultivation and Chlorella Treatment

A total of 800 seedlings of strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Dutch. cv. ‘Kuemsil’) were planted in raised beds (ca. 50 cm width) containing artificial soil substrate and cultivated from October 2021 to April 2022 in a greenhouse located in Jinju, South Korea (35°13′35″ N, 127°57′32″ E). The planting distance between the seedings was about 15 cm, and they were planted in two rows on the beds. The nutrient solution was supplied four times daily via an irrigation system and its composition was formulated based on the RDA method [59]. The pH of irrigated water was 5.8–6.0, and the electrical conductivity was adjusted according to the growth stage of strawberry plants: 0.8–1.5 dS m−1 (vegetative to budding) and 1.2–1.8 dS m−1 (flowering to ripening). During the cultivation period, the temperature in the greenhouse was controlled to maintain the following levels: 26 °C for daytime and more than 8 °C for nighttime. Additionally, the management of flower number was conducted as 5–7 flower buds per inflorescence, and misshapen fruits also were cut off.
There were four different application rates of C. fusca CHK0059 culture solution to strawberry seedlings: 0% (control), 0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.4% of OCD. The Chlorella solutions were applied weekly to the soil substrate through an irrigation system. The appropriate level of Chlorella solution recommended by the RDA for strawberry cultivation is 0.2% OCD [60], so the application rates for this study were installed based on this.

4.3. Fruit and Plant Collection

Strawberry fruits, with 80–90% of the fruit surface showing a visible red color [59], were sampled weekly for five months, from December 2021 to April 2022. Of those, up to 50 individuals weighing 15 ± 5 g were selected per treatment each month and their FW recorded. Then, analysis for other fruit characteristics was performed using six fruit samples: e.g., hardness, SSC, total sugars and components (sucrose, fructose, and glucose), total organic acids and components (citric acid, malic acid, and acetic acid), nutrients (P, Mg, Ca, and K), and anthocyanins.
Plant sampling was performed after the last fruit harvest in April 2022. Six individuals of each Chlorella treatment were selected, and their photosynthesis rates were measured in situ. Then, the plant samples were collected and transferred to a laboratory of Gyeongsang National University to determine other plant characteristics, such as morphology, dry weight, photosynthetic pigments (Chl a, Chl b, total Chl, and carotenoid), and nutrients (N, P, Mg, Ca, and K).

4.4. Grey Mold Incidence during Postharvest Storage

Strawberry fruits harvested in the last sampling month were stored at 4 °C and 80–90% relative humidity in a cold chamber (JSSC-700C, JS Research Inc., Gongju, Republic of Korea). Afterward, the occurrence of grey mold disease (Botrytis cinerea) on the fruit surface was observed for 45 days. Each Chlorella treatment had 10 individual fruits. The disease incidence (%) of strawberry fruits was estimated as a proportion of pathogen-caused area to total area, the scale of which was measured using the ImageJ v. 1.51i software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/index.html: accessed on 1 March 2023). The postharvest storage assay was conducted in duplicate.

4.5. Analytical

The hardness (N) and SSC (°Brix) of collected fruits were recorded using a fruit hardness tester (KM-1, Fujiwara Factory, Tokyo, Japan) and a Brix refractometer (Surakan SRS03, Snix Electronics Co., Ltd., Cheongju, Republic of Korea), respectively.
The photosynthesis rate in the leaves of strawberry plants was measured using a portable fluorometer with leaf-clip holders (MINI–PAM–II, Heinz Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany). In addition, the photosynthetic pigments, such as chlorophylls and carotenoids, in the leaves were determined following the extraction method with 80% acetone [61]. The extract was measured at 470, 645, and 663 nm wavelengths with a UV spectrophotometer (UV–160A, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and the pigments of Chl a, Chl b, total Chl (a + b), and carotenoids were estimated with the following formula [1]:
Chl a = 12.7 A663 − 2.69 A645
Chl b = 22.9 A645 − 4.68 A663
Total Chl (a + b) = 20.29 A645 + 8.02 A663
Carotenoids = (1000 A480 − 1.82 Chl a − 85.02 Chl b)/198
where A is the absorbance value at the appropriate wavelength.
The N concentration in plant samples was determined by a Kjeldahl distiller (K–355, BÜCHI, Flawil, Switzerland) following wet digestion with H2SO4–HClO4 solution [62]. To determine the concentrations of nutrients, including P, K, Ca, and Mg, in plants and fruits, the samples were digested with HNO3–H2O2 solution and then determined using ICP–OES (iCAP Pro XP Duo, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) [62].
For carbohydrate analyses, dried fruit samples (100 mg) were extracted with 10 mL of distilled water heated for four hours in a water bath at 60 °C and then centrifuged for 15 min at 3000 rpm. The supernatant was filtered with a 0.45-µm syringe filter and the contents of organic acids, such as citric, malic, and acetic acids, were determined using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) (Dionex Ultimate 3000, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Dreieich, Germany) by injection into a SunFire TM C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 µm, Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The mobile phase used was 0.02 N H2SO4 and the flow rate was 1 mL min−1. The soluble organic acids were detected with a variable wavelength detector (VWD-3100, Thermo Fisher, Crawley, UK). The sum of these three organic acids was considered as TOA.
The supernatant extracted from the fruit samples above was also used to determine soluble sugars according to a method of Keutgen and Pawelzik [30]. Contents of fructose, glucose, and sucrose in the extracts were determined using an Agilent 1200 series HPLC (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a refractive index detector (RID) following injection of the fruit extracts (20 µL) into an Agilent Zorbax carbohydrate column at 30 °C (4.6 mm × 150 mm, I.d., 5 µm). The mobile phase used was 75% acetonitrile and the flow rate was 1.4 mL min−1. The sum of fructose, glucose, and sucrose was considered TS.
Anthocyanin content in strawberry fruit was determined with the pH differential method [63]. The frozen sample was mixed thoroughly with 0.025 M potassium chloride buffer (pH 1.0) and 0.4 M sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.5) and then incubated for 90 min at room temperature. After centrifugation, the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 520 and 700 nm wavelengths with a UV spectrophotometer (UV–160A, Shimadzu, Japan). The following formula was used to calculate the anthocyanin content expressed as cyanidin-3-glucoside equivalents (CGE):
Anthocyanin   mg   CGE   L 1   FW = A   ×   MW   × DF   × 10 3 ε   ×   1
where A: (A520nmA700nm)pH1.0 − (A520nmA700nm)pH4.5; MW (molecular weight, g mol−1) = 449.2; DF = dilution factor; 103 = conversion factor from g to mg; ε = 26,900 (molar extinction coefficient for cyanidin-3-glucoside, L−1 mol−1 cm−1); 1 = pathlength (cm).

4.6. Fruit Quality Index

To assess the quality of fruit flavor, i.e., sweetness, data for sugar and organic acids in strawberries were used. To characterize it, the S:A ratio [64] was calculated with the following formula: TS content (sucrose + fructose + glucose)/TOA content (citric + malic + acetic acids). In addition, the sweetness of strawberries was evaluated by a method of Keutgen and Pawelzik [30]. The sweetness index of fruits was calculated based on the degree to which each carbohydrate contributes to overall sweetness as follows: SI = (1.0 × glucose) + (2.3 × fructose) + (1.35 × sucrose).

4.7. Statistical Analysis

To compare differences in variables of plant and fruit characteristics among different Chlorella treatments, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc test at the 0.05 probability level was conducted (n = 50 for FW and 6 for others). Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the correlations among the properties of fruits sampled in the second and last sampling months. Principal component analysis was performed to investigate patterns of variation in the dataset, focusing on the degree of relationships among key parameters related to plant performance and fruit quality throughout different Chlorella-level treatments. All statistical analyses in the present study were performed using the R program (version 3.3.3).

5. Conclusions

Microalgae are known to be of great utility for agricultural crop production, but their efficiency may vary depending on the species and treatment levels. Our findings obtained from the current fieldwork demonstrate that C. fusca CHK0059 has a high value as a biofertilizer resource for strawberry cultivation. Application of C. fusca CHK0059 stimulated the nutrient uptake efficiency (e.g., N, P, K, Mg, etc.) and physiological characteristics (e.g., photosynthesis, pigments, and biomass) of strawberry plants, leading to improvements in the fruit characteristics (e.g., SSC and hardness) and flavor quality (e.g., S:A ratio and SI). Among the fruit-related parameters, sucrose and anthocyanin contents tended to show the greatest response to Chlorella application, indicating that these substances may be key factors in improving the quality of strawberry fruits during the whole cultivation period. Additionally, the elevated content of anthocyanins in fruits following Chlorella application appeared to serve as antifungal agents for postharvest strawberries. Overall, the application of C. fusca CHK0059 could promote the overall growth and performance of strawberry plants, contributing to the improvement of strawberry quality and yield as well as postharvest storage capacity, especially in 0.2% OCD treatment. Further studies are needed to specifically identify the mechanisms of the effects of Chlorella fertilization through analysis of the interactions among various factors that determine the quality of strawberry fruits.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-N.K., J.H.C. and Y.B.L.; methodology, Y.-N.K., J.H.C., K.-A.L., H.C. and M.-J.K.; validation, Y.-N.K., K.-A.L.,Y.-E.Y. and V.K.; formal analysis, Y.-N.K., J.H.C., S.Y.K., Y.-E.Y., H.C. and V.K.; investigation, Y.-N.K., J.H.C. and S.Y.K.; resources, M.-J.K.; data curation, J.H.C., K.-A.L. and V.K.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-N.K., J.H.C. and K.-A.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.-N.K. and Y.B.L.; visualization, Y.-N.K., Y.-E.Y. and V.K.; supervision, Y.B.L.; funding acquisition, Y.-N.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was carried out with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. PJ015641022023 or RS-2021-RD009112)” Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kim, Y.-N.; Cho, Y.-S.; Lee, J.-H.; Seo, H.-R.; Kim, B.-H.; Lee, D.-B.; Lee, Y.B.; Kim, K.-H. Short-Term Responses of Soil Organic Carbon Pool and Crop Performance to Different Fertilizer Applications. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Daniel, A.I.; Fadaka, A.O.; Gokul, A.; Bakare, O.O.; Aina, O.; Fisher, S.; Burt, A.F.; Mavumengwana, V.; Keyster, M.; Klein, A. Biofertilizer: The Future of Food Security and Food Safety. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, Y.-N.; Lee, J.-H.; Seo, H.-R.; Kim, J.-W.; Cho, Y.-S.; Lee, D.; Kim, B.-H.; Yoon, J.-H.; Choe, H.; Lee, Y.B.; et al. Co-Responses of Soil Organic Carbon Pool and Biogeochemistry to Different Long-Term Fertilization Practices in Paddy Fields. Plants 2022, 11, 3195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mącik, M.; Gryta, A.; Frąc, M. Biofertilizers in Agriculture: An Overview on Concepts, Strategies and Effects on Soil Microorganisms. Adv. Agron. 2020, 162, 31–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Savci, S. An Agricultural Pollutant: Chemical Fertilizer. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 2012, 3, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, Y.; Pan, X.; Li, J. Current Agricultural Practices Threaten Future Global Food Production. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2015, 28, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, Y.-N.; Choi, J.H.; Kim, S.Y.; Choe, H.; Shin, Y.; Yoon, Y.-E.; Lee, K.-A.; Kim, M.-J.; Lee, Y.B. Application Effect of Chlorella Fusca CHK0059 as a Biofertilizer for Strawberry Cultivation. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 2022, 41, 282–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Singh, D.; Thapa, S.; Geat, N.; Mehriya, M.L.; Rajawat, M.V.S. Biofertilizers: Mechanisms and Application. In Biofertilizers; Rakshit, A., Meena, V.S., Parihar, M., Singh, H.B., Singh, A.K., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2021; Chapter 12; pp. 151–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, H.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Qin, X.; Chen, J.; Wu, L.; Lin, S.; Rensing, C.; Lin, W. Bio-Fertilizer Amendment Alleviates the Replanting Disease under Consecutive Monoculture Regimes by Reshaping Leaf and Root Microbiome. Microb. Ecol. 2022, 84, 425–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H.; Petropoulos, S.A.; Shahrajabian, N. Developing Sustainable Agriculture Systems in Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Production by Using Chitosan and Chitin-Based Biostimulants. Plants 2023, 12, 2469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chatterjee, A.; Singh, S.; Agrawal, C.; Yadav, S.; Rai, R.; Rai, L.C. Role of Algae as a Biofertilizer. In Algal Green Chemistry; Rastogi, R.P., Madamwar, D., Pandey, A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; Chapter 10; pp. 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Precedence Research. Biofertilizers Market Size to Hit USD 9.14 Bn by 2032. Available online: https://www.precedenceresearch.com/biofertilizers-market (accessed on 21 September 2023).
  13. Thomas, L.; Singh, I. Microbial Biofertilizers: Types and Applications. In Biofertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture and Environment; Giri, B., Prasad, R., Wu, Q.-S., Varma, A., Eds.; Soil Biology; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 55, pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H. The Application of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi as Microbial Biostimulant, Sustainable Approaches in Modern Agriculture. Plants 2023, 12, 3101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nosheen, S.; Ajmal, I.; Song, Y. Microbes as Biofertilizers, a Potential Approach for Sustainable Crop Production. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Raimi, A.; Roopnarain, A.; Adeleke, R. Biofertilizer Production in Africa: Current Status, Factors Impeding Adoption and Strategies for Success. Sci. Afr. 2021, 11, e00694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ann, S.-W.; Lee, J.-M.; Cho, Y.-K. Perilla Leaf Fertilization Effect of Fertilizer by Chlorella and Seafood By-product Fermentation. J. Environ. Sci. Int. 2020, 29, 423–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dineshkumar, R.; Subramanian, J.; Gopalsamy, J.; Jayasingam, P.; Arumugam, A.; Kannadasan, S.; Sampathkumar, P. The Impact of Using Microalgae as Biofertilizer in Maize (Zea Mays L.). Waste Biomass Valor. 2019, 10, 1101–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. El-Sharony, T.F.; El-Gioushy, S.F.; Amin, O.A. Effect of Foliar Application with Algae and Plant Extracts on Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of Fruitful Mango Trees Cv. Fagri Kalan. J. Hortic. 2015, 2, 1000162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Faheed, F.A.; Fattah, Z.A. Effect of Chlorella Vulgaris as Bio-Fertilizer on Growth Parameters and Metabolic Aspects of Lettuce Plant. J. Agric. Soc. Sci. 2008, 4, 165–169. [Google Scholar]
  21. Garcia-Gonzalez, J.; Sommerfeld, M. Biofertilizer and Biostimulant Properties of the Microalga Acutodesmus Dimorphus. J. Appl. Phycol. 2016, 28, 1051–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, M.-J.; Shim, C.-K.; Kim, Y.-K.; Ko, B.-G.; Park, J.-H.; Hwang, S.-G.; Kim, B.-H. Effect of Biostimulator Chlorella Fusca on Improving Growth and Qualities of Chinese Chives and Spinach in Organic Farm. Plant Pathol. J. 2018, 34, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lee, S.-M.; Ryu, C.-M. Algae as New Kids in the Beneficial Plant Microbiome. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 599742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. RDA. Chlorella, Crops Are Growing Rapidly and Farm Income Is also Rapidly (in Korean). Available online: http://www.rda.go.kr/board/board.do?boardId=farmprmninfo&prgId=day_farmprmninfoEntry&dataNo=100000771576&mode=updateCnt (accessed on 21 November 2023).
  25. Kim, M.-J.; Shim, C.-K.; Kim, Y.-K.; Park, J.-H.; Hong, S.-J.; Ji, H.-J.; Han, E.-J.; Yoon, J.-C. Effect of Chlorella vulgaris CHK0008 Fertilization on Enhancement of Storage and Freshness in Organic Strawberry and Leaf Vegetables. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 2014, 32, 872–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, M.-J.; Shim, C.-K.; Ko, B.-G.; Kim, J. Effect of the Microalga Chlorella Fusca CHK0059 on Strawberry PGPR and Biological Control of Fusarium Wilt Disease in Non-Pesticide Hydroponic Strawberry Cultivation. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 30, 708–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. El-Ghanam, A.A.; Farfour, S.; Ragab, S. Bio-Suppression of Strawberry Fruit Rot Disease Caused by Botrytis Cinerea. J. Plant Pathol. Microbiol. 2015, S3, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, M.; Wang, G.; Xiao, L.; Xu, X.; Liu, X.; Xu, P.; Lin, X. Bis(2,3-Dibromo-4,5-Dihydroxybenzyl) Ether, a Marine Algae Derived Bromophenol, Inhibits the Growth of Botrytis Cinerea and Interacts with DNA Molecules. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 3838–3851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gigliotti, G. Effect of Microalgal Biomass on the Strawberry (Fragaria x Ananassa) Yield and Quality. Master’s Thesis, Universidade do Algarve, Faro, Portugal, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  30. Keutgen, A.; Pawelzik, E. Modifications of Taste-Relevant Compounds in Strawberry Fruit under NaCl Salinity. Food Chem. 2007, 105, 1487–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gonçalves, A.L. The Use of Microalgae and Cyanobacteria in the Improvement of Agricultural Practices: A Review on Their Biofertilising, Biostimulating and Biopesticide Roles. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hu, H.-J.; Xu, K.; He, L.-C.; Wang, G.-X. A Model for the Relationship between Plant Biomass and Photosynthetic Rate Based on Nutrient Effects. Ecosphere 2021, 12, e03678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lee, K.-A.; Kim, Y.-N.; Kantharaj, V.; Lee, Y.B.; Woo, S.Y. Seedling Growth and Photosynthetic Response of Pterocarpus Indicus L. to Shading Stress. Plant Signal. Behav. 2023, 18, 2245625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Çakirsoy, I.; Miyamoto, T.; Ohtake, N. Physiology of Microalgae and Their Application to Sustainable Agriculture: A Mini-Review. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1005991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, Z.; Liang, T.; Kang, C. Molecular Bases of Strawberry Fruit Quality Traits: Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities. Plant Physiol. 2023, 193, 900–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cao, F.; Guan, C.; Dai, H.; Li, X.; Zhang, Z. Soluble Solids Content Is Positively Correlated with Phosphorus Content in Ripening Strawberry Fruits. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 195, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Del Olmo, I.; Blanch, M.; Romero, I.; Vazquez-Hernandez, M.; Sanchez-Ballesta, M.T.; Escribano, M.I.; Merodio, C. Involvement of Oligosaccharides and Sucrose-Related Genes on Sucrose Retention in Strawberries from Ripening to Shelf-Life. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2020, 169, 111301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Schwieterman, M.L.; Colquhoun, T.A.; Jaworski, E.A.; Bartoshuk, L.M.; Gilbert, J.L.; Tieman, D.M.; Odabasi, A.Z.; Moskowitz, H.R.; Folta, K.M.; Klee, H.J. Strawberry Flavor: Diverse Chemical Compositions, a Seasonal Influence, and Effects on Sensory Perception. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e88446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Osorio, S.; Ruan, Y.-L.; Fernie, A.R. An Update on Source-to-Sink Carbon Partitioning in Tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lemoine, R.; Camera, S.L.; Atanassova, R.; Dédaldéchamp, F.; Allario, T.; Pourtau, N.; Bonnemain, J.-L.; Laloi, M.; Coutos-Thévenot, P.; Maurousset, L. Source-to-Sink Transport of Sugar and Regulation by Environmental Factors. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Aluko, O.O.; Li, C.; Wang, Q.; Liu, H. Sucrose Utilization for Improved Crop Yields: A Review Article. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Batista-Silva, W.; Nascimento, V.L.; Medeiros, D.B.; Nunes-Nesi, A.; Ribeiro, D.M.; Zsögön, A.; Araújo, W.L. Modifications in Organic Acid Profiles during Fruit Development and Ripening: Correlation or Causation? Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zell, M.B.; Fahnenstich, H.; Maier, A.; Saigo, M.; Voznesenskaya, E.V.; Edwards, G.E.; Andreo, C.; Schleifenbaum, F.; Zell, C.; Drincovich, M.F. Analysis of Arabidopsis with Highly Reduced Levels of Malate and Fumarate Sheds Light on the Role of These Organic Acids as Storage Carbon Molecules. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 1251–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Cordenunsi, B.R.; Oliveira do Nascimento, J.R.; Genovese, M.I.; Lajolo, F.M. Influence of Cultivar on Quality Parameters and Chemical Composition of Strawberry Fruits Grown in Brazil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 2581–2586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wanpeng, X.; Zheng, Q.; Juanfang, L.; Junping, Q. Comparative Analysis of Three Types of Peaches: Identification of the Key Individual Characteristic Flavor Compounds by Integrating Consumers’ Acceptability with Flavor Quality. Hortic. Plant J. 2017, 3, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Etienne, A.; Génard, M.; Lobit, P.; Mbeguié-A-Mbéguié, D.; Bugaud, C. What Controls Fleshy Fruit Acidity? A Review of Malate and Citrate Accumulation in Fruit Cells. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 1451–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Sun, Y.; Asghari, M.; Zahedipour-Sheshgelani, P. Foliar Spray with 24-Epibrassinolide Enhanced Strawberry Fruit Quality, Phytochemical Content, and Postharvest Life. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 39, 920–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Roussos, P.; Denaxa, N.; Damvakaris, T. Strawberry Fruit Quality Attributes after Application of Plant Growth Stimulating Compounds. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 119, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jia, H.; Wang, Y.; Sun, M.; Li, B.; Han, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Li, X.; Ding, N.; Li, C.; Ji, W. Sucrose Functions as a Signal Involved in the Regulation of Strawberry Fruit Development and Ripening. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 453–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Li, Z.; Wei, Y.; Xu, Y.; Han, P.; Jiang, S.; Xu, F.; Wang, H.; Tao, N.; Shao, X. Terpinen-4-Ol Treatment Maintains Quality of Strawberry Fruit during Storage by Regulating Sucrose-Induced Anthocyanin Accumulation. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2021, 174, 111461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guo, R.; Yuan, G.; Wang, Q. Sucrose Enhances the Accumulation of Anthocyanins and Glucosinolates in Broccoli Sprouts. Food Chem. 2011, 129, 1080–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Olivares, D.; Contreras, C.; Muñoz, V.; Rivera, S.; González-Agüero, M.; Retamales, J.; Defilippi, B.G. Relationship among Color Development, Anthocyanin and Pigment-Related Gene Expression in ‘Crimson Seedless’ Grapes Treated with Abscisic Acid and Sucrose. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 115, 286–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Petrasch, S.; Knapp, S.J.; Van Kan, J.A.; Blanco-Ulate, B. Grey Mould of Strawberry, a Devastating Disease Caused by the Ubiquitous Necrotrophic Fungal Pathogen Botrytis Cinerea. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2019, 20, 877–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Schaefer, H.M.; Rentzsch, M.; Breuer, M. Anthocyanins Reduce Fungal Growth in Fruits. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2008, 3, 1934578X0800300808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sivankalyani, V.; Feygenberg, O.; Diskin, S.; Wright, B.; Alkan, N. Increased Anthocyanin and Flavonoids in Mango Fruit Peel Are Associated with Cold and Pathogen Resistance. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 111, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, Y.; Butelli, E.; De Stefano, R.; Schoonbeek, H.; Magusin, A.; Pagliarani, C.; Wellner, N.; Hill, L.; Orzaez, D.; Granell, A. Anthocyanins Double the Shelf Life of Tomatoes by Delaying Overripening and Reducing Susceptibility to Gray Mold. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23, 1094–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Schaefer, H.M.; Rolshausen, G. Plants on Red Alert: Do Insects Pay Attention? Bioessays 2006, 28, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Peters, D.J.; Constabel, C.P. Molecular Analysis of Herbivore-induced Condensed Tannin Synthesis: Cloning and Expression of Dihydroflavonol Reductase from Trembling Aspen (Populus Tremuloides). Plant J. 2002, 32, 701–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. RDA. Manual for Strawberry Cultivation; RDA: Wanju, Republic of Korea, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  60. NAAS. Chlorella Culture Method and Agricultural Application; RDA: Wanju, Republic of Korea, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  61. Lichtenthaler, H.K. Chlorophylls and Carotenoids: Pigments of Photosynthetic Biomembranes. Meth. Enzymol. 1987, 148, 350–382. [Google Scholar]
  62. NIAST. Methods of Analysis of Soil and Plant; RDA: Suwon, Republic of Korea, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  63. Lee, J.; Durst, R.W.; Wrolstad, R.E. Collaborators: Determination of Total Monomeric Anthocyanin Pigment Content of Fruit Juices, Beverages, Natural Colorants, and Wines by the pH Differential Method: Collaborative Study. J. AOAC Int. 2005, 88, 1269–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Montero, T.M.; Mollá, E.M.; Esteban, R.M.; López-Andréu, F.J. Quality Attributes of Strawberry during Ripening. Sci. Hortic. 1996, 65, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phenotype (A), dry weight (B), and nutrient content in shoot (C) and root (D) of strawberry plants grown under different Chlorella application rates: 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4% of the optimal cell density (OCD). Data are mean ± standard errors (n = 6). Different letters indicate significant difference among the treatments (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Phenotype (A), dry weight (B), and nutrient content in shoot (C) and root (D) of strawberry plants grown under different Chlorella application rates: 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4% of the optimal cell density (OCD). Data are mean ± standard errors (n = 6). Different letters indicate significant difference among the treatments (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05).
Plants 12 04132 g001
Figure 2. The properties of strawberry fruits grown under different Chlorella application rates for five months: 0 (control), 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4% of the optimal cell density (OCD). Data are mean ± standard errors (n = 50 for fresh weight and 6 for hardness and soluble solid content). Different letters indicate significant difference among the treatments (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05). (A) Fresh weight, (B) hardness, (C) soluble solid content.
Figure 2. The properties of strawberry fruits grown under different Chlorella application rates for five months: 0 (control), 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4% of the optimal cell density (OCD). Data are mean ± standard errors (n = 50 for fresh weight and 6 for hardness and soluble solid content). Different letters indicate significant difference among the treatments (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05). (A) Fresh weight, (B) hardness, (C) soluble solid content.
Plants 12 04132 g002
Figure 3. Monitoring sugar content and composition in strawberry fruits grown under different Chlorella application rates for five months: 0 (control), 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4% of the optimal cell density (OCD). Data are mean ± standard errors (n = 6). Different letters indicate significant difference among the treatments (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05). (A) Total sugars, (B) sucrose, (C) fructose, (D) glucose.
Figure 3. Monitoring sugar content and composition in strawberry fruits grown under different Chlorella application rates for five months: 0 (control), 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4% of the optimal cell density (OCD). Data are mean ± standard errors (n = 6). Different letters indicate significant difference among the treatments (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05). (A) Total sugars, (B) sucrose, (C) fructose, (D) glucose.
Plants 12 04132 g003
Figure 4. Monitoring organic acids content and composition in strawberry fruits grown under different Chlorella application rates for five months: 0 (control), 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4% of the optimal cell density (OCD). Data are mean ± standard errors (n = 6). Different letters indicate significant difference among the treatments (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05). (A) Total organic acids, (B) citric acid, (C) malic acid, (D) acetic acid.
Figure 4. Monitoring organic acids content and composition in strawberry fruits grown under different Chlorella application rates for five months: 0 (control), 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4% of the optimal cell density (OCD). Data are mean ± standard errors (n = 6). Different letters indicate significant difference among the treatments (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05). (A) Total organic acids, (B) citric acid, (C) malic acid, (D) acetic acid.
Plants 12 04132 g004
Figure 5. Correlation matrix of fruit properties sampled over the two months with the most favorable growing environment conditions during the monitoring period: (A) January 2022 and (B) April 2022. Positive and negative correlations are displayed in blue and red colors, respectively. Color intensity and the size of the circle are proportional to the Pearson correlation coefficients. The legend color on the right side of the correlogram indicates the correlation coefficient and the corresponding colors.
Figure 5. Correlation matrix of fruit properties sampled over the two months with the most favorable growing environment conditions during the monitoring period: (A) January 2022 and (B) April 2022. Positive and negative correlations are displayed in blue and red colors, respectively. Color intensity and the size of the circle are proportional to the Pearson correlation coefficients. The legend color on the right side of the correlogram indicates the correlation coefficient and the corresponding colors.
Plants 12 04132 g005
Figure 6. Anthocyanin contents in strawberry fruits sampled in different Chlorella application rates at the last sampling month: 0 (control), 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4% of the optimal cell density (OCD). Data are mean ± standard errors (n = 6). Different letters indicate significant difference among the treatments (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Anthocyanin contents in strawberry fruits sampled in different Chlorella application rates at the last sampling month: 0 (control), 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4% of the optimal cell density (OCD). Data are mean ± standard errors (n = 6). Different letters indicate significant difference among the treatments (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05).
Plants 12 04132 g006
Figure 7. Incidence of grey mold disease (Botrytis cinerea) on strawberry fruits, sampled in different Chlorella application rates including 0 (control), 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4% of the optimal cell density (OCD), during 45 day storage test. (A) Temporal changes in the pathogen occurrence and severity on the fruits at 15 day intervals. (B) The incidence of grey mold disease is estimated as the proportion of pathogen-caused areas at 15 day intervals. Data are mean ± standard errors (n = 10). Different letters indicate significant difference among the treatments (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05).
Figure 7. Incidence of grey mold disease (Botrytis cinerea) on strawberry fruits, sampled in different Chlorella application rates including 0 (control), 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4% of the optimal cell density (OCD), during 45 day storage test. (A) Temporal changes in the pathogen occurrence and severity on the fruits at 15 day intervals. (B) The incidence of grey mold disease is estimated as the proportion of pathogen-caused areas at 15 day intervals. Data are mean ± standard errors (n = 10). Different letters indicate significant difference among the treatments (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05).
Plants 12 04132 g007
Figure 8. Principal component analysis (PCA) of plant and fruit properties in treatments of different Chlorella application rates: 0 (control), 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4% of the optimal cell density (OCD). (A) Scores for the first two principal components of four different application rates. (B) Loading plot of the parameters related to plant physiology and fruit quality.
Figure 8. Principal component analysis (PCA) of plant and fruit properties in treatments of different Chlorella application rates: 0 (control), 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4% of the optimal cell density (OCD). (A) Scores for the first two principal components of four different application rates. (B) Loading plot of the parameters related to plant physiology and fruit quality.
Plants 12 04132 g008
Table 1. The maximum photosystem II quantum yield (Fv/Fm) and photosynthetic pigments in leaves of strawberry plants grown under different Chlorella application rates.
Table 1. The maximum photosystem II quantum yield (Fv/Fm) and photosynthetic pigments in leaves of strawberry plants grown under different Chlorella application rates.
Treatment
(% OCD)
Fv/FmChlorophyll a
(mg 100 g−1)
Chlorophyll b
(mg 100 g−1)
Total Chlorophyll
(mg 100 g−1)
Carotenoids
(mg 100 g−1)
Control0.813 b0.580 b0.195 b0.777 b1.923 b
0.1%0.813 b0.628 ab0.205 ab0.843 ab2.257 a
0.2%0.834 a0.656 ab0.208 ab0.865 ab2.406 a
0.4%0.840 a0.683 a0.235 a0.920 a2.338 a
Data represent the mean values of six replicates. Different letters indicate significant difference among the treatments (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05). OCD, the optimal cell density of Chlorella fusca CHK0059.
Table 2. Concentration of nutrients, including P, Mg, Ca, and K, in strawberry fruits grown under different Chlorella application rates for five months.
Table 2. Concentration of nutrients, including P, Mg, Ca, and K, in strawberry fruits grown under different Chlorella application rates for five months.
ElementTreatment
(% OCD)
Sampling Time
21.1222.0122.0222.0322.04
P
(g kg−1)
Control3.61 c3.81 c3.51 c3.70 c5.09 b
0.1%5.62 b5.57 b5.39 b4.99 b6.14 ab
0.2%6.25 ab6.03 b4.74 bc5.69 b6.32 ab
0.4%6.97 a8.04 a7.44 a7.15 a7.64 a
Mg
(g kg−1)
Control1.62 a1.45 a1.51 ab1.62 a1.81 a
0.1%1.63 a1.50 a1.55 ab1.57 a1.69 a
0.2%1.49 a1.41 a1.34 b1.47 a1.56 a
0.4%1.37 a1.53 a1.65 a1.58 a1.71 a
Ca
(g kg−1)
Control3.29 a3.70 a2.99 a3.26 a2.61 a
0.1%3.19 a2.54 ab2.57 a3.14 ab2.75 a
0.2%2.59 ab2.67 b2.52 a2.35 ab1.89 b
0.4%1.85 b2.07 b2.18 a2.26 b2.01 b
K
(g kg−1)
Control15.4 a12.4 b11.1 b12.3 b17.0 a
0.1%14.8 a13.9 ab13.5 ab13.2 ab16.1 a
0.2%14.2 a12.3 b11.4 b13.4 ab15.0 a
0.4%14.1 a15.2 a16.6 a15.3 a16.7 a
Data represent the mean values of six replicates. Different letters indicate significant difference in the concentration of each element among the treatments at each sampling time (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05). OCD, the optimal cell density of Chlorella fusca CHK0059.
Table 3. Assessment of fruit flavor quality of strawberries grown under different Chlorella application rates for five months.
Table 3. Assessment of fruit flavor quality of strawberries grown under different Chlorella application rates for five months.
Quality IndexTreatment
(% OCD)
Sampling Time
21.1222.0122.0222.0322.04
S:A ratioControl5.26 b7.49 b7.61 ab7.92 ab5.61 c
0.1%8.38 a7.76 b7.96 a8.39 ab7.30 b
0.2%9.36 a9.99 a8.81 a9.58 a8.47 a
0.4%7.77 a7.76 b5.77 b6.83 b7.12 b
SIControl4.59 c6.85 b9.41 a9.97 a8.75 b
0.1%8.53 a8.16 ab9.33 a8.90 b9.14 ab
0.2%8.76 a9.95 a10.0 a9.37 ab10.0 a
0.4%6.83 b7.81 b7.38 b7.64 c7.18 c
Data represent the mean values of six replicates. The fruit quality was evaluated by determining the sugar–organic acid (S:A) ratio and the sweetness index (SI) based on the method of Keutgen and Pawelzik [30]. Different letters indicate significant difference among the treatments (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05). OCD, the optimal cell density of Chlorella fusca CHK0059; S:A, total sugars to total organic acids; SI, the sweetness index.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, Y.-N.; Choi, J.H.; Kim, S.Y.; Yoon, Y.-E.; Choe, H.; Lee, K.-A.; Kantharaj, V.; Kim, M.-J.; Lee, Y.B. Biostimulatory Effects of Chlorella fusca CHK0059 on Plant Growth and Fruit Quality of Strawberry. Plants 2023, 12, 4132. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12244132

AMA Style

Kim Y-N, Choi JH, Kim SY, Yoon Y-E, Choe H, Lee K-A, Kantharaj V, Kim M-J, Lee YB. Biostimulatory Effects of Chlorella fusca CHK0059 on Plant Growth and Fruit Quality of Strawberry. Plants. 2023; 12(24):4132. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12244132

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Young-Nam, Jun Hyeok Choi, Song Yeob Kim, Young-Eun Yoon, Hyeonji Choe, Keum-Ah Lee, Vimalraj Kantharaj, Min-Jeong Kim, and Yong Bok Lee. 2023. "Biostimulatory Effects of Chlorella fusca CHK0059 on Plant Growth and Fruit Quality of Strawberry" Plants 12, no. 24: 4132. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12244132

APA Style

Kim, Y. -N., Choi, J. H., Kim, S. Y., Yoon, Y. -E., Choe, H., Lee, K. -A., Kantharaj, V., Kim, M. -J., & Lee, Y. B. (2023). Biostimulatory Effects of Chlorella fusca CHK0059 on Plant Growth and Fruit Quality of Strawberry. Plants, 12(24), 4132. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12244132

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop