Next Article in Journal
Agro-Physiological and DNA Methylation Responses to Salinity Stress in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), Aegilops cylindrica Host, and Their Introgressed Lines
Next Article in Special Issue
Unconventional Germination in Terrestrial Plants: A Counterintuitive Case in Desiccation-Sensitive Garcinia aristata (Clusiaceae) Seeds Showing Seedling Growth Without Roots
Previous Article in Journal
Transcription Factor and Protein Regulatory Network of PmACRE1 in Pinus massoniana Response to Pine Wilt Nematode Infection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Current Insights into Weak Seed Dormancy and Pre-Harvest Sprouting in Crop Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Ethylene, a Signaling Compound Involved in Seed Germination and Dormancy

by
Françoise Corbineau
Seed Biology, UMR7622 CNRS-Sorbonne-Université, 75005 Paris, France
Plants 2024, 13(19), 2674; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13192674
Submission received: 13 August 2024 / Revised: 16 September 2024 / Accepted: 19 September 2024 / Published: 24 September 2024

Abstract

:
The present review is focused on current findings on the involvement of ethylene in seed biology. The responsiveness of seeds to ethylene depends on the species and the dormancy status, improving concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 200 μL L−1. The signaling pathway of ethylene starts with its binding to five membrane-anchored receptors, which results in the deactivation of Constitutive Triple Response 1 (CTR1, a protein kinase) that does not exert its inhibitory effect on Ethylene Insensitive 2 (EIN2) by phosphorylating its cytosolic C-terminal domain. An analysis of germination in the presence of inhibitors of ethylene synthesis or action, and using seeds from mutant lines altered in terms of the genes involved in ethylene synthesis (acs) and the signaling pathway (etr1, ein2, ein4, ctr1 and erf1), demonstrates the involvement of ethylene in the regulation of seed dormancy. The promoting effect of ethylene is also regulated through crosstalk with abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellins (GAs), essential hormones involved in seed germination and dormancy, and Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS). Using a mutant of the proteolytic N-degron pathway, Proteolysis (PRT6), the Ethylene Response Factors (ERFs) from group VII (HRE1, HRE2, RAP 2.2, RAP2.3 and RAP 2.12) have also been identified as being involved in seed insensitivity to ethylene. This review highlights the key roles of EIN2 and EIN3 in the ethylene signaling pathway and in interactions with different hormones and discusses the responsiveness of seeds to ethylene, depending on the species and the dormancy status.

1. Introduction

Ethylene (C2H4) is a simple gaseous molecule with 2C atoms bonded by a double bond; it is considered as a phyto-hormone involved in plant physiology. It is known to be a key regulator of fruit ripening (chlorophyll degradation, climacteric respiratory burst, softening, aroma volatile production, etc.) [1,2,3], but it is also involved in numerous steps of the plant life cycle, including seed germination and seedling development, shoot growth and differentiation, leaf growth and photosynthesis, the induction and opening of flowers, and the senescence and abscission of leaves, flowers, and fruits [4,5,6,7]. It also plays a role in plant tolerance to abiotic stress [5].
Seeds are considered to be dormant when they fail to germinate or germinate poorly when they are placed under apparently favorable conditions (water, temperature, O2, light) [8,9,10,11]. The inability to germinate is associated with the embryo itself (embryo dormancy) or can result from the inhibitory action of the covering structures (seed coat-imposed dormancy) [8,9]. Primary dormancy is established during seed development on the mother plant, while secondary dormancy is induced when seeds are placed under unfavorable conditions (too low or too high temperatures, too low oxygen concentration, darkness or light) [9,11]. Baskin and Baskin [12] propose five types of dormancy: (1) physiological dormancy (PD) that can be released by different treatments (chilling, gibberellins, ethylene, etc.); (2) morphological dormancy (MD) due to a delay in embryo development; (3) morpho-physiological dormancy (MPD), combining both PD and MD; (4) physical dormancy (PY) associated with the water impermeability of the seed coat; and (5) combinational dormancy (PY + PD), combining the water impermeability (PY) and embryo dormancy (PD).
Water, oxygen, and temperature are the three crucial factors regulating seed germination. In orthodox seeds, imbibition is a prerequisite to allow the resumption of seed metabolism, including respiration, protein and RNA synthesis, and hormone biosynthesis and signaling pathways [8,13], but other factors such as temperature and oxygen are essential. Seed sensitivity to environmental factors (oxygen, temperature) depends on the species and the dormancy depth [8,14]. In addition, the requirement of oxygen depends on the nature of the reserve (lipids, starch, proteins) and the temperature [14,15], and the temperature range allowing germination is associated with the seed origin. The optimum temperatures for germination are around 10–20 °C and 25–35 °C for seeds from temperate climates and tropical and sub-tropical climates, respectively [8,16]. Generally, non-dormant seeds germinate in a wider range of temperature than dormant ones [8,16,17].
The regulation of seed dormancy and germination by the hormonal balance between abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellins (GAs) is well documented [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. ABA is known to play a crucial role in the induction of dormancy during seed development and its maintenance during seed imbibition, while GAs are involved in dormancy release or germination [19,20,26,27]. In addition to ABA and GAs, other hormones (ethylene, brassinosteroids, jasmonic acid, auxins, cytokinins, etc.) are involved in the control of seed germination and dormancy [28,29,30,31,32] via a complex hormonal signaling network.
From the past decade onwards, Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) have also been recognized as key regulators of cellular signaling pathways and have emerged as fundamental actors in seed germination and dormancy [33,34,35,36]. The interaction of ROS with the ABA, GA, and C2H4 signaling pathways has been demonstrated in the regulation of dormancy in sunflower [37,38,39,40], barley [41] and Arabidopsis [42,43].
The aims of the present review are (1) to describe the responsiveness of dormant seeds to ethylene and the involvement of its biosynthesis and signaling pathway in dormancy release using different mutants; (2) to discuss the interactions between C2H4 and other hormones, particularly ABA and GAs, and ROS; and (3) to demonstrate the emerging mechanisms that contribute to the regulation of seed dormancy by C2H4 by highlighting the involvement of the proteolytic N-degron pathway in response to C2H4, with group VII of the Ethylene Response Factors being substrates of this pathway.

2. Effects of Exogenous Ethylene on Seed Germination

The effects of ethylene on seed germination and dormancy are well documented [14,30,31,32,44,45]. Ethylene stimulates the germination of seeds from various species, including several parasitic plants such as Orobanche ramosa [46] and some striga (Striga asiatica, S. lutea, S. hermonthica) [47,48], numerous weeds, including the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, and cultivated plants from the Rosaceae (apple, Malus domestica; peach, Prunus persica; bird cherry, Prunus avium), Asteraceae (sunflower, Helianthus annuus; lettuce, lactuca sativa), Amaranthaceae (redroot-pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus; beet, Beta vulgaris), and Fabaceae families (peanut, Arachis hypogaea) (Table 1, [14,30,31,32,44,45]). This hormone allows germination of seeds exhibiting embryo dormancy to occur, like apple [49,50,51,52,53], peach [54], bird cherry [55], beechnut [56], and sunflower [57,58]. It replaces chilling, which usually breaks dormancy in Rosaceae seeds and beechnut, and after-ripening in dry conditions, which alleviates dormancy in sunflowers. In the case of sunflower, dormant embryos become able to germinate at low temperatures (10–15 °C) in the presence of ethylene (20–50 μL L−1) when they cannot germinate in air [57]. Ethylene also removes seed coat-imposed dormancy in various species (Arabidopsis thaliana [59,60,61,62], Rumex crispus [63,64], Trifolium subterraneum [65], Xanthium pennsylvanicum [66,67,68,69]) (Table 2, [14,30,31,32,44,45,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88]). In addition, the inhibitory effect of high temperatures (thermo-dormancy) is alleviated by C2H4 in seeds of lettuce [82], Cicer arietinum [79], and sunflower [80]. Ethylene also promotes germination at non-optimal temperatures, i.e., at high temperatures, in Xanthium pennsylvanicum [68], lettuce [83,84], and Amaranthus retroflexus [74], suggesting that it prevents the induction of secondary dormancy induced by high temperatures.
The stimulatory effect of ethylene is dose dependent, and optimal concentrations range from 0.5 to 200 μL L−1, depending on the species and the dormancy depth. The sensitivity to ethylene increases during the breaking of seed dormancy either during chilling or dry storage (after-ripening). In the case of sunflower, for example, the dormant embryos at harvest require 40–50 μL L−1 ethylene in order to germinate at 15 °C, and only 3 μL L−1 after 15 weeks of dry storage [89]. In Arabidopsis (Col 0) seeds, which exhibit a seed coat-imposed dormancy at temperatures higher than 10 °C, 100% germination occurs at 25 °C in darkness in the presence of 50–100 μL L−1 ethylene, but after 1 day at 4 °C, 1.25 μL L−1 ethylene is enough to allow 75% germination [62]. Ribeiros and Barros [88] demonstrated that non-dormant seeds of Stylosanthes humilis are at least 50-fold more sensitive to ethylene than freshly harvested dormant ones. In contrast, sensitivity to ethylene decreases during the induction of a secondary dormancy [68,69,81,89,90].
The effect of ethylene also depends on the time at which seeds are imbibed in its presence. Ethylene is most effective during the first 4 h of imbibition in Xanthium pennsylvanicum [66], when the effectiveness of a 3 h treatment in the presence of 50 μL L−1 ethylene increases during sunflower seed imbibition; this effect is optimal after about 2 days, and then decreases [89]. In addition, the improving effect of ethylene also requires at least 5% oxygen in sunflower [58] and Arabidopsis seeds [62,91].
Often, ethylene stimulates the germination of seeds which are light sensitive; however, the hormone generally enhances the effect of light, but does not overcome the light requirement [14].
Different studies have also indicated that ACC, the direct precursor of ethylene, applied in the medium at a concentration of 0.1–1 mM, stimulates the germination of dormant seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana, Helianthus annuus, and Lactuca sativa (cf. references in Table 2).

3. Ethylene Biosynthesis and Seed Germination

3.1. Ethylene Biosynthesis Pathway

Ethylene biosynthesis in seeds is the same as that described for other organs (leaves, flowers, fruits, etc.) [4,28,92,93]. It consists in three steps (Figure 1): in the first step, the amino acid, methionine, is converted to S-Adenosyl-L-Methionine (S-AdoMet or SAM) via the methionine adenosyltransferase or SAM synthetase (SAMS); In the second step, S-AdoMet is converted to 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylic acid (ACC), the precursor of ethylene, and 5′-Methylthioadenosine (MTA) by ACC-synthase (ACS). This biochemical reaction is considered to be the rate-limiting step during ethylene biosynthesis [92]. MTA is then recycled back to methionine through the Yang cycle [93]; In the last step, ACC oxidation by ACC oxidase (ACO) results in the production of C2H4 with carbon dioxide (CO2) and hydrogen cyanide (HCN) as by-products [94,95]. This reaction requires oxygen as a co-substrate [93,96,97]. The apparent Km for ACO activity measured in vivo and in vitro ranges from 0.4 to 10–11% oxygen, depending on the plant organ, ACC concentration, and temperature [96,97]. In sunflower hypocotyl segments, the Km value for oxygen is similar for ACO measured in vitro (11.4%) and in vivo (10.6%) [98]; however, it is much higher than the Km value measured in melon [99] and avocado fruit [100]. ACC can also be converted to 1-(Malonylamino)-Cyclopropane-1-Carboxylic acid (MACC) [101]. Polyamine biosynthesis can occur after decarboxylation of S-AdoMet via the S-Adenosyl-Methionine decarboxylase.
ACS and ACO belong to a multi-gene family, and the expression of ACS and ACO genes differ among each other [95,102,103]. In Arabidopsis, there are height functioning ACS genes [103,104]. For ACO, homology analyses revealed five AtACO genes, but ACO1 and ACO2 seem to be the major ACOs in seeds in two Brassicaceae (Arabidopsis, Lepidium sativum) [105,106]. Ethylene has been shown to regulate its own synthesis via a biochemical process known as autocatalytic biosynthesis, by inducting ACO transcription [107]. It is also required to stimulate ACO gene expression in pea [108,109], beechnut [56], and turnip [110]. In contrast, the expression of SoACS7 in Sisymbrium officinale and PsACS1 in pea is not affected [86,108,109]. Among the treatments which break dormancy, cyanide, which alleviates apple and sunflower embryo dormancy, also stimulates the ethylene production associated with an increase in ACS and ACO activities in apple seedlings [111], while it reduces HaACS and HaACO expression in sunflower [112]. In Arabidopsis, ACS6 is activated in response to cyanide when other ACS gene are unaffected [113]; in such cases, chilling down-regulates the expression of ACOs but results in the transient expression of ACS [29,31,114]. Cold stratification is often associated with an improvement of ethylene production after transfer to a warmer temperature due to an accumulation of ACC resulting from a differential inhibition of cold on ACS and ACO (Figure 1).

3.2. Ethylene Production during Germination

The increase in ethylene production in germinating seeds is essentially explained by an increase in ACC oxidase activity [28,29,31,32,44,86]. Ethylene production is generally low during phases 1 (imbibition) and 2 (germination stricto sensu) of the germination process, and a burst of the gas is detected during phase 3 (growth), when the radicle elongates through the seed coat [40,75,115,116]. In sunflower embryos, for example, using a laser photo acoustic spectroscopy, El-Maarouf-Bouteau et al. [40] measured ethylene emanation of about 0.1 mL h−1 g dw−1 in both dormant and non-dormant embryos.
The stimulatory effects of exogenous ethylene in the breaking of seed dormancy in numerous species (cf. Table 1 and Table 2) suggest that this compound is involved in seed physiology. This involvement was also shown and confirmed by using inhibitors of ethylene biosynthesis affecting ACC activity (AVG, Amino-ethoxyvinylglycine; AOA, Amino-oxyacetic acid) and ACO activity (Co2+). AVG inhibits ethylene production, but its effect on germination depends on the species. It also inhibits the germination of apple embryos [50] but does not have a strong action on the germination of lamb’s quarters seeds [78], bean [117], peanut [118], or Amaranthus caudatus [70]. The inhibitory effect of AVG disappears in the presence of exogenous ethylene.
The effects of a few antagonists of the action of ethylene (CO2; 2,5-NBD, 2,5-Norbornadiene; STS, Silver Thiosulfate) have been studied in numerous species. However, the effect of CO2 is debatable, since it can inhibit and/or stimulate seed germination [44]. The inhibitory effect of STS has been shown in sunflower [57,58] and thermo-dormant lettuce [82]. More recently, the use of 2,5-NBD, a volatile cyclic olefin that inhibits the action of ethylene at its binding site, revealed that endogenous ethylene was required to break dormancy or improve seed germination [70,71].
Ethylene production remains low during seed imbibition and generally becomes detectable when radicles protrude from the seed covering structures at the end of the germination process [40,119,120]. Radicle protrusion is always associated with a peak of ethylene emanation. Similarly, ACO1 expression in pea [109] and in turnip [121] is maximal at radicle emergence. A close relationship between ethylene production and seed vigor has also been reported in numerous species such as snapbean [122], pea, cocklebur [123], and sunflower [124]. ACC-dependent C2H4 production has therefore been proposed as a marker of seed quality [125,126].
Exogenous ACC stimulates the germination of various ethylene-sensitive seeds such as lettuce, sunflower, cocklebur, Amaranthus caudatus and A. retroflexus, chickpea, and sugar beet (Table 2, review by [31]). This stimulatory effect of ACC suggests that dormancy is related to low ethylene production due to an insufficient level of ACC. Table 3 ([57,58]) shows the respective effects of ethylene, ACC, and various inhibitors of ethylene synthesis, as well as their actions on the germination of dormant and non-dormant embryos of sunflower. Both ACC and exogenous ethylene were shown to stimulate the germination of dormant embryos, when the various inhibitors used markedly inhibited the germination of non-dormant ones. All these results suggest that ethylene is involved in the germination of dormant and non-dormant seeds.

4. Ethylene Signaling Pathways

4.1. Canonical Ethylene Signaling Pathway

The ethylene signaling pathway includes several key components, including a family of five membrane receptors of the hormone, CTR1 (CONSTITUTIVE TRIPLE RESPONSE 1), a negative regulator of the pathway, EIN2 (ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE 2), a central positive regulator of the pathway, and EIN3 (ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE 3) and its homolog EIN3-Like (EIL1) that accumulate in the nucleus and initiate a transcriptional cascade involving Ethylene Responses Factors (ERFs) controlling the expression of ethylene dependent genes (Figure 2, [7,127,128,129,130,131,132,133]). In Arabidopsis, C2H4 is recognized by five receptors: ETR1 and ETR2 (ETHYLENE RESPONSE 1 and 2), ERS1 and ERS2 (ETHYLENE RESPONSE SENSOR 1 and 2), and EIN4 (ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE 4), localized in the membrane of the endoplasmatic reticulum. These receptors are divided into two groups. The first group consists of ETR1 and ERS1, which are characterized by a histidine kinase in their N terminal end and by three trans-membrane domains that bind C2H4 through coordination with copper [134,135]; the second group includes ETR2, ERS2, and EIN4, which possess four trans-membrane regions but contain degenerate histidine kinase domains and exhibit serine/threonine kinase activity [129,132,136,137,138]. Genetic study using different mutants, i.e., single (etr1), double (etr1, ers1) and triple (etr2, ers2, ein4), demonstrated that all receptors are able to sense ethylene, but ETR1 and ERS1 are suggested to be more important than the three other receptors [133,139,140]. Some convergences have also been revealed between AHK2-4 (ARABIDOPSIS HISTIDINE KINASE 2-4), which functions as a cytokinin receptor, and ETR1 and ERS1, two ethylene receptors [18,141].
In the presence of ethylene (Figure 2A), the binding of C2H4 to receptors is facilitated by copper supplied by a copper transporter (RAN1, RESPONSIVE TO ANTAGONIST 1), resulting in the deactivation of the histidine kinase activity of CTR1 which, in turn, leads to the activation of the signaling compound EIN2, considered to be a central component in the hormone signal transduction pathway [127,142,143]. The loss of sensitivity to ethylene of ein2 mutant confirms this key role [127,131,144]. The cleavage of the C-terminal end of EIN2 and its translocation to the nucleus activates downstream components of the pathway [144]. Consequently the primary transcription factors (EIN3 and EIN3-like = EIL) are activated, which, in turn, activate other transcription factors, called Ethylene Response Factors (ERFs). The turnover of EIN2 is regulated by ETP1 and ETP2 (EIN2 TARGETING PROTEIN) [145], and the EIN3 level is controlled by EBF (EIN3 BINDING F-BOX) [146,147,148]. The ERFs bind to the promoter region of ethylene-responsive genes, resulting in an altered gene regulation, and in the nucleus, EIN3, EILs, Ethylene Response Element Binding Proteins (EREBPS) and ERFs activate the transcription of ethylene-response genes [129,132,133,149].
In the absence of ethylene (Figure 2B), receptor-CTR1 complexes remain active, allowing CTR1 to phosphorylate EIN2, thus preventing ethylene response through EIN2. The stability of EIN2 is regulated by ETP1/2 through interaction with its C-terminal. In addition, in the nucleus, EIN3 also can be degraded by EBF1/2 [130,132,145].
Although the molecular mechanisms of the transduction of ethylene signaling have been studied extensively, works carried out in the H. Qiao laboratory (University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA) have provided evidence that chromatin modifications, specifically histone acetylation, regulate ethylene signaling and response [150,151,152,153,154,155]. In the presence of ethylene, the EIN2 C-terminus contributes to downstream ethylene signaling via elevation of acetylation at H3K14 and H3K23, depending on both EIN2 and EIN3 [150,151]. The authors propose a unique mechanism by which ENAP1 (EIN2 nuclear associated protein 1) interacts with chromatin: in the absence of ethylene, ENAP1 interacts with histones, preserving the open chromatin regions, while in the presence of ethylene, it interacts with EIN2 C-terminus, resulting in elevated acetylation levels and leading to fast transcriptional responses [152,153,154,155]. In addition, the identification of two histone deacetylases (HDACs), SRT1 and SRT2, that interact with ENAP1 also allows us to conclude that acetylation and deacetylation switch on and off gene expression in response to ethylene [153,154,155].

4.2. Non Canonical Ethylene Signaling Pathways

In the past, studies on the ethylene signaling pathway have suggested the existence of signaling pathways where ethylene receptors could initiate an alternative signaling pathway independently of CTR1 or EIN2 [133,156,157]. Figure 3 summarizes the structure of the classical ethylene signaling pathway (Figure 3, line A) and indicates three alternative pathways (Figure 3, lines B, C and D). The EIN2 independent pathway (Figure 3, line B) involves a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade that bypasses EIN2 and acts downstream of CTR1. MKK9 is reported to activate MAP3/6, which then phosphorylates EIN3 [130]; however, the role of the MAPK cascade remains unclear [133,158]. In the signaling pathway described in Figure 3 (line C), RTE1 (REVERSION TO ETHYLENE SENSITIVITY 1) is required for ETR1 N-terminal signaling [159,160,161], and EIN2 is suggested to be the potential candidate [162,163]. The last alternative pathway (Figure 3, line D), named Two-Component signaling (TCS), involves histidine kinases and a response regulator. The mediated proteins are referred to as Arabidopsis Histidine-containing Phosphotransmitters (AHPs) that target at the Arabidopsis Response Regulators (ARRs) [164], subsequently affecting ethylene signaling [165]. This TCS pathways seems to be involved in the regulation of hypocotyl growth, stomatal closure regulation, shortening root, and plant defense [166,167,168,169].

4.3. ERFs

Downstream signaling of ethylene relies on the activation of a large array of ERFs which, in turn, modify gene expression [43]. ERF1 that acts downstream of all the components of the ethylene signaling (cf. Figure 2) was the first gene identified in this family that includes 147 members in Arabidopsis and is subdivided into twelve groups [170]. It acts as the intermediate between EIN3 and ethylene-inducible target genes. Several proteins in the ERF family are targets of EIN3 and are also induced by C2H4, such as ERF2, ERF5, and ERF11 [171]. They have also been shown to regulate the expression of the genes involved in dehydration and hypoxia responses [172,173] and in seed dormancy regulated through DOG1 (DELAY OF GERMINATION) [174].
It is important to note that the ERFs from group VII consist of five proteins, i.e., RAP 2.2 (RELATED TO AP), RAP 2.3, RAP 2.12, HRE1 (HYPOXIA RESPONSE), and HRE2, nominated ERF 75, 72, 74, 73 and 71, respectively [170], and identified as substrates of the N-degron pathway [175]. Recently, Wang et al. [62,176] demonstrated that mutant seeds affected in the proteolytic N-degron pathway, proteolysis (prt6), are insensitive to ethylene, suggesting that PRT6 is involved in the dormancy release by ethylene in Arabidopsis. ERFs from group VII have also been found to be involved in seed insensitivity to ethylene. Furthermore, exogenous ethylene reduces the expression of the three RAPs in wild type (Col-0) seeds but induces or maintains their expression in prt6 mutant.

5. Crosstalk between Ethylene, Plant Hormones, and ROS

5.1. Interrelation between Ethylene, ABA, and GA

Ethylene plays an important role in seed dormancy alleviation and germination through the regulation of the ABA/GA hormonal balance as well as the control of the expression of various genes involved in ABA, GAs, and other hormone (jasmonic acid, auxins, cytokinins) biosynthesis and signaling pathways [31,62,105,177]. There is a negative interaction between ABA and C2H4, and the inhibitory effect of ABA on the germination can be partially reversed in the presence of C2H4 or ACC, the precursor of ethylene [105,178,179,180]. Treatment for 30 h with 100 μL L−1 ethylene of dormant Arabidopsis seeds imbibed at 25 °C resulted in the germination of all of the seed population associated with a decrease in ABA content from 43.9 ng g DW in air to 6.2 ng g DW in the presence of ethylene [176]. ACC oxidase (ACO) is up-regulated in aba2 mutant, whereas both the ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE (ABI1) and cytochrome P450, family 707, (CYP707A2) genes are down-regulated in etr1-1 [181]. The improving effect of ethylene is also associated with a decrease in seed sensitivity to ABA [178]. Moreover, mutations in the ethylene synthesis pathway often increase sensitivity to ABA [182] and, in parallel, mutations in both synthesis and signaling pathways affect seed sensitivity to C2H4 [29,30,177,178,181]. For example, the emission of ethylene is one third that of wild type in acs 7 mutant. The seeds also become hypersensitive to ABA [182].
Regarding the interactions between C2H4 and gibberellins, GAs are able to stimulate the germination of seeds, the dormancy of which is broken by ethylene, and there is a positive interaction between both hormones [28,31,44,60,177,183]. Ethylene mimics the action of GAs, since it improves the germination of GA-deficient mutants of tomato (gib1) and Arabidopsis (ga1) [184]. In Arabidopsis, the improving effect of ethylene has been associated with a decrease in ABA (see above) and an increase in GA4 from 0.49 to 1.08 ng g DW after 30 h of imbibition in the presence of ethylene, resulting in a decrease of ABA/GA4 ratio from 89.7 in air down to 5.7 in the presence of ethylene [176]. This beneficial effect is associated with a down-regulation of the expression of ABI 5 (ABA INSENSITIVE 5), a core component of the ABA signaling pathway, and of RGL2 (RGA-Like 2) and RGA 2 (REPRESSOR OF ga1-3) negative regulators of GA signaling [176].

5.2. Interrelation between Ethylene, ABA and GA Signaling Pathways

Studies using mutant lines altered in the genes involved in the ethylene signaling pathway (etr1, ein2, ain1, and erf1) demonstrated the involvement of C2H4 in the regulation of seed dormancy through a complex hormonal signaling network [18,28,31,185]. Mutation at the level of C2H4 receptor (ETR1) etr-1 leads to a deeper dormancy than the wild type and impacts sensitivity to ABA and ABA content [59,60,61,178,179,181,186,187,188,189] (Table 4). It also results in higher endogenous ABA content than in wild type, and in a lower level of ABA glucose ester (ABA-GE), suggesting that reduced ABA metabolism contributes to ABA accumulation in the mutant [187]. This increase in ABA content could also result from a down-regulation of CYP707A2 in etr1-1 [181]. The mutation of etr1-2 also results in an increase in GAs, in auxin (IAA) and its metabolite indole-3-aspartate (IAAsp), and in cytokinin [187].
EIN2 plays a key role in the C2H4 signaling pathway, and similarly to seeds of etr1, seeds of ein2 mutant are insensitive to ethylene, exhibit a deeper dormancy than the wild type, and are ABA hypersensitive [178,179,181,187,188,189] (Table 4). The high ABA level in ein2 mutant is due to the up-regulation of NCED3, a key enzyme in the ABA biosynthesis pathway [181]. It has been proposed that EIN2 lies at the cross-roads of multiple hormone response pathways [127]. Conversely, mutation in ctr1 leads to an increased ethylene response and a decrease in ABA sensitivity [189] (Table 4). In addition, seeds of ctr1 mutant have a slightly enhanced rate of germination [28] (Table 4).
The stimulatory effect of C2H4 is associated with an activation of GA synthesis and signaling, while the promoting effect of GAs is often due to a stimulation of C2H4 synthesis [29,86]. For example, in the case of ga1-3 mutant (GA-deficient mutant), GA4, which stimulates seed germination, also up-regulates the expression of ACO and ERS1 (ETHYLENE SENSOR 1) [183]. Studies of the expression of SoGA3ox2 and SoGA20ox2, two genes involved in GA biosynthesis, during imbibition of Sisymbrium officinale in the presence of GA4+7 and ethylene, indicated that GA synthesis is strongly regulated by both GA and ethylene [86]. In contrast, in beechnut embryos, the expression of FsGA20ox1 is increased when ethylene synthesis is inhibited in the presence of 2-aminoxyacetic acid (AOA) [56].
Figure 4 illustrates the interactions between ethylene, ABA, and GAs based on genetic, molecular, and physiological studies on seed responsiveness to the three hormones and cited in Section 5.1 and Section 5.2. Ethylene down-regulates the ABA content by inhibiting its synthesis, in particular through NCED and the promotion of its catabolism through CYP707. It also regulates ABA signaling through ABI5. In addition, ABA inhibits C2H4 biosynthesis by reducing ACS and ACO activities. Ethylene also improves GA metabolism, through the regulation of GA3ox and GA20ox activities, and GA signaling pathways, through RGL2 and RGA.

5.3. Interrelation between Ethylene and ROS

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species, such as hydroxyl radical (·OH), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide anion (O2), hydroxylamines, and nitrates, break the dormancy of different species [34,37,38,76,190,191]. ROS are considered as key signaling compounds in the regulation of seed dormancy and germination ([33,34,35,36], and interrelations with ABA, GAs, and C2H4 have been established in sunflower [40], barley [41], and Arabidopsis [42,43]. In sunflower, C2H4 breaks dormancy [57], and this improving effect is associated with an increase in ROS accumulation within the embryonic axis, probably through the activation of NADPH oxidase [40]. In contrast, Lin et al. [192,193] showed that ethylene treatment of Arabidopsis seeds imbibed under salinity stress resulted in a decrease in ROS level. These conflicting results may be explained in part by the high production of ROS in response to stress [33,35]. Numerous works have investigated the effects of ROS on C2H4 production during germination; however, the data obtained are often questionable, since C2H4 emission peaks during radicle protrusion through the seed envelops, i.e., after the germination process itself [40]. The synergistic effects of ROS and C2H4 on the breaking of dormancy has been demonstrated in different species, such as Sorbus pohuashanensis [194], wild cardoon [195], and Brassica oleracea [76].
Recently, Jurdak et al. [43] found that seed response to ethylene involved mitochondrial retrograde response through nuclear ROS production and the up-regulation of the AOX1a (alternative oxidase) and ANACO13 (transcription factor of the NAC (NAM, ATAF, and CVC) families.
ROS production regulated by environmental conditions enhances ABA catabolism and both ethylene and GAs signaling pathways (Figure 4).

6. Conclusions and Future Research Directions

Seed germination and dormancy are multifactorial phenomena, the regulation of which involves different internal and external factors. Among these factors, the soil atmosphere, and particularly ethylene, may exert important effects on seed physiology. The interactions between ethylene, ABA, and GAs have been quite well described, but it would also be important to determine the hierarchy of the components of the signaling pathways of various other hormones, such as brassinosteroids, jasmonate, and auxins, and to identify their putative role as sensors of environmental signals. Analyses of data obtained using proteomic, metabolomic, and transcriptomic tests must also take into account the complexity of the crosstalk between ethylene and other hormones and ROS. Bioinformatic approaches would then also be important to integrate the complexities of the different networks. Recently, the N-degron pathway was demonstrated to be involved in the response of Arabidopsis seeds to exogenous ethylene. It is also necessary to identify the direct effect of ethylene and its indirect effects in relation with the metabolites produced in parallel, such as polyamides after decarboxylation of S-AdoMet, and CO2 and CN, byproducts of ACC oxidation, and the effects on other hormone syntheses and signaling pathways.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

This paper is a review and the reader can read all the citations in the reference list.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lelièvre, J.M.; Latché, A.; Jones, B.; Bouzayen, M.; Pech, J.C. Ethylene and fruit ripening. Physiol. Plant. 1997, 101, 727–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pech, J.C.; Bouzayen, M.; Latché, A. Maturation des fruits. In Technologies de Transformation des Fruits; Albagnac, G., Varoquaux, P., Montigaud, J.-C., Eds.; Editions TEC & DOC, Lavoisier: Paris, France; London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 79–102. [Google Scholar]
  3. Watkins, C.B. Ethylene synthesis, mode of action, consequences and control. In Fruit Quality and Its Biological Basis; Knee, M., Ed.; Sheffield Academic Press Ltd.: Sheffield, UK, 2002; pp. 180–224. [Google Scholar]
  4. Abeles, F.B.; Morgan, P.W.; Saltveit, M.E., Jr. Ethylene in Plant Biology; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  5. Iqbal, N.; Khan, N.A.; Ferrante, A.; Trivellini, A.; Francini, A.; Khan, M.I.R. Ethylene role in plant growth, development and senescence: Interaction with other phytohormones. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Khan, N.A.; Khan, M.I.R.; Ferrante, A.; Poor, P. Editorial: Ethylene: A key regulatory molecule in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dubois, M.; Van den Broeck, L.; Inzé, D. The pivotal role of ethylene in plant growth. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bewley, J.D.; Black, M. Seeds: Physiology of Development and Germination; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bewley, J.D. Seed germination and dormancy. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 1055–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Finch-Savage, W.E.; Leubner-Metzger, G. Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytol. 2006, 171, 501–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hilhorst, H.W.M. Definitions and hypotheses of seed dormancy. In Annual Plant Reviews, Seed Development, Dormancy and Germination; Bradford, K., Nonogaki, H., Eds.; Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2007; Volume 27, pp. 50–71. [Google Scholar]
  12. Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C. A classification system of seed dormancy. Seed Sci. Res. 2004, 14, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hadas, A. Seedbed preparation—The soil physical environment of germinating seeds. In Handbook of Seed Physiology. Applications to Agriculture; Benech-Arnold, R.L., Sanchez, R.A., Eds.; Food Products Press: New York, NY, USA; The Haworth Reference Press: London, UK; The Haworth Press, Inc.: Oxford, UK, 2004; pp. 3–49. [Google Scholar]
  14. Corbineau, F.; Côme, D. Control of seed germination and dormancy by gaseous environment. In Seed Development and Germination; Kigel, J., Galili, G., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 1995; pp. 397–424. [Google Scholar]
  15. Corbineau, F. Oxygen, a key signalling factor in the control of seed germination and dormancy. Seed Sci. Res. 2022, 32, 126–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M. Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  17. Probert, R.J. The role of temperature in the regulation of seed dormancy and germination. In Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities; Fenner, M., Ed.; CAB International: Oxon, UK, 2000; pp. 261–292. [Google Scholar]
  18. Feurtado, J.A.; Kermode, A.R. A merging of paths: Abscisic acid and hormonal cross-talk in the control of seed dormancy maintenance and alleviation. In Annual Plant Reviews, Seed Development, Dormancy and Germination; Bradford, K., Nonogaki, H., Eds.; Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2007; Volume 27, pp. 176–223. [Google Scholar]
  19. Finkelstein, R.R.; Reeves, W.; Ariizumi, T.; Steber, C. Molecular aspects of seed dormancy. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 387–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nambara, E.; Okamoto, M.; Tatematsu, K.; Yano, R.; Seo, M.; Kamiya, Y. Abscisic acid and the control of seed dormancy and germination. Seed Sci. Res. 2010, 20, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nonogaki, H.; Bassel, G.W.; Bewley, J.D. Germination—Still a mystery. Plant Sci. 2010, 179, 574–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Weitbrecht, K.; Müller, K.; Leubner-Metzger, G. First of the mark: Early seed germination. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 3289–3309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Graeber, K.; Nakabayashi, K.; Miatton, E.; Leubner-Metzger, G.; Soppe, W.J. Molecular mechanisms of seed dormancy. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 1769–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rajjou, L.; Duval, M.; Gallardo, K.; Catusse, J.; Bally, J.; Job, C.; Job, D. Seed germination and vigor. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 507–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sajeev, N.; Koornneef, M.; Bentsink, L. A commitment for life: Decades of unraveling the molecular mechanisms behind seed dormancy and germination. Plant Cell 2024, 36, 1358–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cutler, S.R.; Rodriguez, P.L.; Finkelstein, R.R.; Abrams, S.R. Abscisic acid: Emergence of a core signaling network. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61, 651–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Miransari, M.; Smith, D.L. Plant hormones and seed germination. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 99, 110–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Matilla, A.J.; Matilla-Vazquez, M.A. Involvement of ethylene in seed physiology. Plant Sci. 2008, 175, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Linkies, A.; Leubner-Metzger, G. Beyond gibberellins and abscisic acid: How ethylene and jasmonates control seed germination. Plant Cell Rep. 2012, 31, 253–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Arc, E.; Sechet, J.; Corbineau, F.; Rajjou, L.; Marion-Poll, A. ABA crosstalk with ethylene and nitric oxide in seed dormancy and germination. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Corbineau, F.; Xia, Q.; Bailly, C.; El-Maarouf-Bouteau, H. Ethylene, a key factor in the regulation of seed dormancy. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bailly, C.; Jurdak, R.; Corbineau, F. Ethylene in the regulation of seed dormancy and germination: Molecular mechanisms. In The Plant Hormone Ethylene, Stress Acclimation and Agricultural Applications; Khan, N., Ferrante, A., Munné-Bosch, S., Eds.; Elsevier, Academic Press: London, UK, 2023; pp. 41–60. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bailly, C. Active oxygen species and antioxidants in seed biology. Seed Sci. Res. 2004, 14, 93–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bailly, C.; El-Maarouf-Bouteau, H.; Corbineau, F. From intracellular signaling networks to cell death: The dual role of reactive oxygen species in seed physiology. C. R. Biol. 2008, 331, 806–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bailly, C. The signalling role of ROS in the regulation of seed germination and dormancy. Biochem. J. 2019, 476, 3019–3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bailly, C.; Merendino, L. Oxidative signalling in seed germination and early seedling growth: An emerging role for trafficking and inter-organelle communication. Biochem. J. 2021, 478, 1977–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Oracz, K.; El-Maarouf-Bouteau, H.; Farrant, J.M.; Cooper, K.; Belghazi, M.; Job, C.; Job, D.; Corbineau, F.; Bailly, C. ROS production and protein oxidation as a novel mechanism for seed dormancy alleviation. Plant J. 2007, 50, 452–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. El-Maarouf-Bouteau, H.; Bailly, C. Oxidative signaling in seed germination and dormancy. Plant Signal. Behav. 2008, 3, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bazin, J.; Langlade, N.; Vincourt, P.; Arribat, S.; Balzergue, S.; El-Maarouf-Bouteau, H.; Bailly, C. Targeted mRNA oxidation regulates sunflower seed dormancy alleviation during dry after-ripening. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 2196–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. El-Maarouf-Bouteau, H.; Sajjad, Y.; Bazin, J.; Langlade, N.; Cristescu, S.M.; Balzergue, S.; Baudouin, E.; Bailly, C. Reactive oxygen species, abscisic acid and ethylene interact to regulate sunflower seed germination. Plant Cell Environ. 2015, 38, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bahin, E.; Bailly, C.; Sotta, B.; Kranner, I.; Corbineau, F.; Leymarie, J. Crosstalk between reactive oxygen species and hormonal signaling pathways regulates grain dormancy in barley. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34, 980–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Leymarie, J.; Vitkauskaite, G.; Hoang, H.H.; Gendreau, E.; Chazoule, V.; Meimoun, P.; Corbineau, F.; El-Maarouf-Bouteau, H.; Bailly, C. Role of reactive oxygen species in the regulation of Arabidopsis seed dormancy. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jurdak, R.; Launay-Avon, A.; Paysant-le Roux, C.; Bailly, C. Retrograde signaling from the mitochondria to the nucleus translates the positive effect of ethylene on dormancy breaking of Arabidopsis thaliana seeds. New Phytol. 2021, 229, 2192–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kępczyński, J.; Kępczyńska, E. Ethylene in seed dormancy and germination. Physiol. Plant. 1997, 101, 720–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Santos, J.A.S.; Garcia, Q.S. Ethylene in the regulation of seed dormancy and germination: Biodiversity matters. In The Plant Hormone Ethylene, Stress Acclimation and Agricultural Applications; Khan, N., Ferrante, A., Munné-Bosch, S., Eds.; Elsevier, Academic Press: London, UK, 2023; pp. 61–71. [Google Scholar]
  46. Chun, D.; Wilhelm, S.; Sagen, J.E. Components of record germination in vitro of branched broomrape, Orobanche ramosa L. In Supplement to the Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Parasitic Weeds; Musselman, L.J., Worsham, A.D., Eplee, R.E., Eds.; North Carolina State University: Raleigh, NC, USA, 1979; pp. 18–22. [Google Scholar]
  47. Egley, G.H.; Dale, J.E. Ethylene, 2-chloroethylphosphonic acid and witchweed germination. Weed Sci. 1970, 18, 586–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bebawi, F.F.; Eplee, R.E. Efficacy of ethylene as a germination stimulant of Striga hermonthica. Weed Sci. 1986, 34, 694–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kępczyński, J.; Rudnicki, R.M. Effect of exogenous ethylene on the after-ripening and germination of apple seeds. Fruit Sci. Rep. 1975, 2, 25–41. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kępczyński, J.; Rudnicki, R.M.; Khan, A.A. Ethylene requirement for germination of partly after-ripened apple embryo. Physiol. Plant. 1977, 40, 292–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sinska, I.; Gladon, R. Ethylene and the removal of embryonal apple seed dormancy. HortScience 1984, 19, 73–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sinska, I. Interaction of ethephon with cytokinin and gibberellin during the removal of apple seed dormancy and germination of embryos. Plant Sci. 1989, 64, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sinska, I.; Lewandowska, U. Polyamines and ethylene in the removal of embryonal dormancy in apple seeds. Physiol. Plant. 1991, 81, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Frenkel, C.; Belding, R.D.; William-Lokaj, G.R.; Reighard, G.L. Oxygen- and ethylene-induced germination in dormant peach seeds. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 2020, 85, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Stein, M.; Serban, C.; McCord, P. Exogenous ethylene precursors and hydrogen peroxide aid in early seed dormancy release in sweet cherry. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2021, 146, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Calvo, A.P.; Nicolas, C.; Lorenzo, O.; Nicolas, G.; Rodriguez, D. Evidence for positive regulation by gibberellins and ethylene of ACC oxidase expression and activity during transition from dormancy to germination in Fagus sylvatica L. seeds. J. Plant Growth Reg. 2004, 23, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Corbineau, F.; Bagniol, S.; Côme, D. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seed dormancy and its regulation by ethylene. Israel J. Bot. 1990, 39, 313–325. [Google Scholar]
  58. Corbineau, F.; Côme, D. Germination of sunflower seeds and its regulation by ethylene. In Advances in the Science and Technology of Seeds; Jiarui, F., Khan, A.A., Eds.; Science Press: Beijing, China; New York, NY, USA, 1992; pp. 277–287. [Google Scholar]
  59. Bleecker, A.B.; Estelle, M.A.; Somerville, C.; Kende, H. Insensitivity to ethylene conferred by a dominant mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 1988, 241, 1086–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Siriwitayawan, G.; Geneve, R.L.; Downie, A.B. Seed germination of ethylene perception mutants of tomato and Arabidopsis. Seed Sci. Res. 2003, 13, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wilson, R.L.; Kim, H.; Bakshi, A.; Binder, B.M. The ethylene receptors ETHYLENE RESPONSE1 and ETHYLENE RESPONSE2 have contrasting roles in seed germination of Arabidopsis during salt stress. Plant Physiol. 2014, 165, 1353–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, X.; Yesbergenova-Cuny, Z.; Biniek, C.; Bailly, C.; El-Maarouf-Bouteau, H.; Corbineau, F. Revisiting the role of ethylene and N-end rule pathway on chilling-induced dormancy release in Arabidopsis seeds. Int. J. Molec. Sci. 2018, 19, 3577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Taylorson, R.B. Response of weed seeds to ethylene and related hydrocarbons. Weed Sci. 1979, 27, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Samimy, C.; Khan, A.A. Secondary dormancy, growth-regulator effects, and embryo growth potential in curly dock (Rumex crispus) seeds. Weed Sci. 1983, 31, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Esashi, Y.; Leopold, A.C. Dormancy regulation in subterranean clover seeds by ethylene. Plant Physiol. 1969, 44, 1470–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Katoh, H.; Esashi, Y. Dormancy and impotency of cocklebur seeds. I. CO2, C2H4, O2 and high temperature. Plant Cell Physiol. 1975, 16, 687–696. [Google Scholar]
  67. Egley, G.H. Stimulation of common cocklebur (Xanthium pennsylvanicum) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) seed germination by injections of ethylene into soil. Weed Sci. 1980, 28, 510–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Esashi, Y.; Hata, Y.; Katoh, H. Germination of cocklebur seeds: Interactions between gibberellic acid, benzyladenine, thiourea, KNO3 and gaseous factors. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1975, 2, 569–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Esashi, Y.; Okazaki, M.; Yanai, N.; Hishinuma, K. Control of the germination of secondary dormant cocklebur seeds by various germination stimulants. Plant Cell Physiol. 1978, 19, 1497–1506. [Google Scholar]
  70. Kępczyński, J.; Karssen, C.M. Requirement for the action of endogenous ethylene during germination of non-dormant seeds of Amaranthus caudatus. Physiol. Plant. 1985, 63, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kępczyński, J.; Bihun, M.; Kępczyńska, E. Induction and release of secondary dormancy in Amaranthus caudatus L. seeds. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1996, S03-50, 42. [Google Scholar]
  72. Kępczyński, J.; Kępczyńska, E. The effect of putrescine, ethephon and ACC on germination of thermodormant Amaranthus paniculatus L. seed. In Basic and Applied Aspects of Seed Biology, Fourth International Workshop on Seeds; Côme, D., Corbineau, F., Eds.; ASFIS: Paris, France, 1993; pp. 537–554. [Google Scholar]
  73. Kępczyński, J.; Corbineau, F.; Côme, D. Responsiveness of Amaranthus retroflexus seeds to ethephon, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid and gibberellic acid in relation to temperature and dormancy. Plant Growth Reg. 1996, 20, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Schönbeck, M.W.; Egley, G.H. Phase-sequence of redroot pigweed seed germination responses to ethylene and other stimuli. Plant Physiol. 1981, 68, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ketring, D.L.; Morgan, P.W. Ethylene as a component of the emanations from germinating peanut seeds and its effect on dormant Virginia-type seeds. Plant Physiol. 1969, 44, 326–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sami, A.; Riaz, M.W.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, Z.; Zhou, K. Alleviating dormancy in Brassica oleracea seeds using NO and KAR1 with ethylene biosynthetic pathway, ROS and antioxidant enzymes modifications. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Saini, H.S.; Bassi, P.K.; Spencer, M.S. Use of ethylene and nitrate to break seed dormancy of common lambs’-quarters (Chenopodium album). Weed Sci. 1986, 34, 502–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Machabée, S.; Saini, H.S. Differences in the requirement for endogenous ethylene during germination of dormant and non-dormant seeds of Chenopodium album L. J. Plant Physiol. 1991, 138, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gallardo, M.; Del Mar Delgado, M.; Sanchez-Calle, I.M.; Matilla, A.J. Ethylene production and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid conjugation in thermoinhibited Cicer arietinum L. seeds. Plant Physiol. 1991, 97, 122–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Corbineau, F.; Rudnicki, R.M.; Côme, D. Induction of secondary dormancy in sunflower seeds by high temperature. Possible involvement of ethylene biosynthesis. Physiol. Plant. 1988, 73, 368–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Speer, H.L.; Hsiao, A.I.; Vidaver, W. Effects of germination promoting substances given in conjunction with red light on the phytochrome-mediated germination of dormant lettuce seeds (Lactuca sativa L.). Plant Physiol. 1974, 54, 852–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Abeles, F.B. Role of ethylene in Lactuca sativa cv Grand Rapids seed germination. Plant Physiol. 1986, 81, 780–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Burdett, A.N.; Vidaver, W. Synergistic action of ethylene with gibberellin or red light in germinating lettuce seeds. Plant Physiol. 1971, 48, 656–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Saini, H.S.; Consolacion, E.D.; Bassi, P.K.; Spencer, M.S. Requirement for ethylene synthesis and action during relief of thermoinhibition of lettuce seed germination by combinations of gibberellic acid, kinetin, and carbon dioxide. Plant Physiol. 1986, 81, 950–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ne’eman, G.; Henig-Sever, N.; Eshel, A. Regulation of the germination of Rhus coriaria, a post-fire pioneer, by heat, ash, pH, waterpotential and ethylene. Physiol. Plant. 1999, 106, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Iglesias-Fernandez, R.; Matilla, A. Genes involved in ethylene and gibberellins metabolism are required for endosperm-limited germination of Sisymbrium officinale L. seeds. Planta 2010, 231, 653–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Olatoye, S.T.; Hall, M.A. Interaction of ethylene and light on dormant weed seeds. In Seed Ecology; Heydecker, W., Ed.; Butterworths: London, UK, 1973; pp. 233–240. [Google Scholar]
  88. Ribeiro, D.M.; Barros, R.S. Sensitivity to ethylene as a major component in the germination of seeds of Stylosanthes humilis. Seed Sci. Res. 2006, 16, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Corbineau, F.; Côme, D. Germination of sunflower seeds as related to ethylene synthesis and sensitivity—An overview. In Biology and Biotechnology of the Plant Hormone Ethylene III; Vendrell, M., Klee, H., Pech, J.C., Romojaro, F., Eds.; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 216–221. [Google Scholar]
  90. Jones, J.F.; Hall, M.A. Studies on the requirement for carbon dioxide and ethtylene for germination of Spergula arvensis L. seeds. Plant Sci. Lett. 1984, 16, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, X. The Role of Ethylene and the N-End Rule Pathway in the Regulation of Arabidopsis Seed Dormancy. Ph.D. Thesis, Sorbonne-Université, Paris, France, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  92. Yang, S.F.; Hoffman, N.E. Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1984, 35, 155–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kende, H. Ethylene biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1993, 44, 283–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Bleecker, A.B.; Kende, H. Ethylene: A gaseous signal molecule in plants. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2000, 16, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wang, K.L.C.; Li, H.; Ecker, J.R. Ethylene biosynthesis and signaling networks. Plant Cell 2002, 14, S131–S151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Salveit, M.E.; Dilley, D.R. Rapidly induced wound ethylene from excised segments of etiolated Pisum sativum L. cv Alaska. II Oxygen and temperature dependency. Plant Physiol. 1978, 61, 675–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Yip, W.K.; Jiao, X.Z.; Yang, S.F. Dependence of in vivo ethylene production rate on 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid content and oxygen concentration. Plant Physiol. 1988, 88, 553–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bailly, C.; Bogateck, R.; Dumet, D.; Corbineau, F.; Côme, D. Effects of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid and oxygen concentrations on in vivo and in vitro activity of ACC oxidase of sunflower hypocotyl segments. Plant Growth Reg. 1995, 17, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Smith, J.J.; John, P. Activation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase by bicarbonate/carbon dioxide. Phytochemistry 1993, 32, 1381–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. McGarvey, D.J.; Christoffersen, R.E. Characterization and kinetic parameters of ethylene-forming enzyme from avocado fruit. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 5964–5967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Hoffman, N.E.; Yang, S.F.; McKeon, T. Identification of 1-(malonylamino)cyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid as a major conjugate of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, an ethylene precursor in higher plants. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Com. 1982, 104, 765–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wang, N.N.; Shih, M.C.; Li, N. The GUS reporter-aided analysis of the promoter activities of Arabidopsis ACC synthase genes AtACS4, AtACS5, and AtACS7 induced by hormones and stresses. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 909–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Yamagami, T.; Tsuchisaka, A.; Yamada, K.; Haddon, W.F.; Harden, L.A.; Theologis, A. Biochemical diversity among the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase isozymes encoded by the Arabidopsis gene family. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 49102–49112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Tsuchisaka, A.; Theologis, A. Unique and overlapping expression patterns among the Arabidopsis 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase gene family members. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136, 2982–3000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Linkies, A.; Müller, K.; Morris, K.; Turěcková, V.; Wenk, M.; Cadman, C.S.; Corbineau, F.; Strnad, M.; Lynn, J.R.; Finch-Savage, W.E.; et al. Ethylene interacts with abscisic acid to regulate endosperm rupture during germination: A comparative approach using Lepidium sativum and Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 3803–3822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ruduś, I.; Sasiak, M.; Kępczyński, J. Regulation of ethylene biosynthesis at the level of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase (ACO) gene. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 295–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Lin, Z.; Zhong, S.; Grierson, D. Recent advances in ethylene research. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 3311–3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Petruzzelli, L.; Coraggio, I.; Leubner-Metzger, G. Ethylene promotes ethylene biosynthesis during pea seed germination by positive feedback regulation of 1-amonocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase. Planta 2000, 211, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Petruzelli, L.; Sturaro, M.; Mainieri, D.; Leubner-Metzger, G. Calcium requirement for ethylene-dependent responses involving 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase in radicle tissues of germinated pea seeds. Plant Cell Env. 2003, 26, 661–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Puga-Hermida, M.I.; Gallardo, M.; Rodriguez-Gacio, M.D.; Matilla, A.J. The heterogeneity of turnip-tops (Brassica rapa) seeds inside the silique affects germination, the activity of the final step of the ethylene pathway, and abscisic acid and polyamine content. Funct. Plant Biol. 2003, 30, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Gniazdowska, A.; Krasuska, U.; Bogatek, R. Dormancy removal in apple embryos by nitric oxide or cyanide involves modifications in ethylene biosynthetic pathway. Planta 2010, 232, 1397–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Oracz, K.; El-Maarouf-Bouteau, H.; Bogatek, R.; Corbineau, F.; Bailly, C. Release of sunflower seed dormancy by cyanide: Cross-talk with ethylene signaling pathway. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 2241–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. McMahon-Smith, J.; Artega, R.N. Molecular control of ethylene production by cyanide in Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol. Plant. 2000, 109, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Narsai, R.; Law, S.R.; Carrie, C.; Xu, L.; Whelan, J. In depth temporal transcriptome profiling reveals a crucial developmental switch with roles for RNA processing and organelle metabolism that are essential for germination in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 1342–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Abeles, F.B.; Lonski, J. Stimulation of lettuce seed germination by ethylene. Plant Physiol. 1969, 44, 277–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Fu, J.R.; Yang, S.F. Release of heat pretreatment-induced dormancy in lettuce seeds by ethylene or cytokinin in relation to the production of ethylene and the synthesis of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid during germination. J. Plant Growth Reg. 1983, 2, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Petruzzelli, L.; Harren, F.; Perrone, C.; Reuss, J. On the role of ethylene in seed germination and early root growth of Pisum sativum. J. Plant Physiol. 1995, 145, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Hoffman, N.E.; Fu, J.R.; Yang, S.F. Identification and metabolism of 1-(malonylamino)cyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid in germinating peanut seeds. Plant Physiol. 1983, 71, 197–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Gomez-Jimenez, E.; Olivares, E.; Matilla, A.J. 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase from embryonic axes of germinating chick-pea (Cicer arietinum L.) seeds: Cellular immunolocalization and alterations in its expression by indole-3-acetic acid, abscisic acid and spermine. Seed Sci. Res. 2001, 11, 243–253. [Google Scholar]
  120. Rodriguez-Gacio, M.C.; Matilla, A.J. The last step of the ethylene biosynthesis pathway in turnip (Brassica rapa) seeds: Alterations related to development and germination and its inhibition during desiccation. Physiol. Plant. 2001, 112, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Rodriguez-Gacio, M.C.; Nicolas, C.; Matilla, A.J. The final step of the ethylene biosynthesis pathway in turnip tops (Brassica rapa L. cv. Rapa): Molecular characterization of the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase BeACO1 throughout zygotic embryogenesis and germination of heterogenous seeds. Physiol. Plant. 2004, 121, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Samimy, C.; Taylor, A.G. Influence of seed quality on ethylene production of germinating snap bean seeds. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1983, 108, 767–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Górecki, R.J.; Ashino, H.; Satoh, S.; Esashi, Y. Ethylene production in pea and cocklebur seeds of differing vigour. J. Exp. Bot. 1991, 42, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Chojnowski, M.; Corbineau, F.; Côme, D. Physiological and biochemical changes induced in sunflower seeds by osmopriming and subsequent drying, storage and aging. Seed Sci. Res. 1997, 7, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Khan, A.A. ACC-derived ethylene production, a sensitive test for seed vigor. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1994, 119, 1083–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Corbineau, F. Markers of seed quality: From present to future. Seed Sci. Res. 2012, 22, S61–S68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Alonso, J.M.; Hirayama, T.; Roman, G.; Nourizadeh, S.; Ecker, J.R. EIN2, a bifunctional transducer of ethylene and stress responses in Arabidopsis. Science 1999, 284, 2148–2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Chen, Y.F.; Etheridge, N.; Schaller, G.E. Ethylene signal transduction. Ann. Bot. 2005, 95, 5901–5915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Benavente, L.M.; Alonso, J.M. Molecular mechanisms of ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis. Mol. BioSyst. 2006, 2, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Yoo, S.D.; Cho, Y.H.; Sheen, J. Emerging connections in the ethylene signaling network. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14, 270–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Merchante, C.; Alonso, J.M.; Stepanova, A.N. Ethylene signaling: Simple ligand, complex regulation. Cur. Op. Plant Biol. 2013, 16, 554–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Ju, C.; Chang, C. Mechanistic insights in ethylene perception and signal transduction. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Binder, B.M. Ethylene signaling in plants. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 7710–7725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Hirayama, T.; Kieber, J.J.; Hirayama, N.; Kogan, M.; Guzman, P.; Nourizadeh, S.; Alonso, J.M.; Dailey, W.P.; Dancis, A.; Ecker, J.R. RESPONSIVE-TO-ANTAGONIST1, a Menkes/Wilson disease-related copper transporter, is required for ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis. Cell 1999, 97, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Rodriguez, F.I.; Esch, J.J.; Hall, A.E.; Binder, B.M.; Schaller, G.E.; Bleecker, A.B. A copper cofactor for the ethylene receptor ETR1 from Arabidopsis. Science 1999, 283, 996–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Sakai, H.; Hua, J.; Chen, Q.G.; Chang, C.; Medrano, L.J.; Bleecker, A.B.; Meyerowitz, E.M. ETR2 is an ETR1-like gene involved in ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis. Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 5812–5817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Hua, J.; Sakai, H.; Nourizadeh, S.; Chen, Q.G.; Bleecker, A.B.; Ecker, J.R.; Meyerowitz, E.M. EIN4 and ERS2 are members of the putative ethylene receptor gene family in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 1321–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Shakeel, S.N.; Wang, X.; Binder, B.M.; Schaller, G.E. Mechanisms of signal transduction by ethylene: Overlapping and non-overlapping signalling roles in a receptor family. AoB Plants 2013, 5, plt010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Hall, B.; Shakeel, S.; Schaller, G. Ethylene receptors: Ethylene perception and signaling transduction. J. Plant Growth Reg. 2007, 26, 118–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Qu, X.; Hall, B.P.; Gao, Z.; Schaller, G.E. A strong constitutive ethylene-response phenotype conferred on Arabidopsis plants containing null mutations in the ethylene receptors ETR1 and ERS. BMC Plant Biol. 2007, 7, 3. [Google Scholar]
  141. Grefen, C.; Harter, K. Plant two-component systems: Principles, functions, complexity and cross talk. Planta 2004, 219, 733–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Alonso, J.M.; Ecker, J.R. The ethylene pathway: A paradigm for plant hormone signalling and interaction. Sci. STKE 2001, 2001, re1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Hall, B.P.; Shakeel, S.N.; Amir, M.; Haq, N.U.; Qu, X.; Schaller, G.E. Histidine kinase activity of the ethylene receptor ETR1 facilitates the ethylene response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 682–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Stepanova, A.N.; Alonso, J.M. Arabidopsis ethylene signaling pathway. Sci. STKE 2005, 276, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Qiao, H.; Chang, K.N.; Yazaki, J.; Ecker, J.R. Interplay between ethylene, ETP1/ETP2 F-box proteins, and degradation of EIN2 triggers ethylene responses in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2009, 23, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Guo, H.; Ecker, J.R. Plant responses to ethylene gas are mediated by SCF(EBF1/EBF2)-dependent proteolysis of EIN3 transcription factor. Cell 2003, 115, 667–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Potuschak, T.; Vansiri, A.; Binder, B.M.; Lechner, E.; Vierstra, R.D.; Genschik, P. The exoribonuclease XRN4 is a component of the ethylene response pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 3047–3057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Gagne, J.M.; Smalle, J.; Gingerich, D.J.; Walker, J.M.; Yoo, S.-D.; Yanagisawa, S.; Vierstra, R.D. Arabidopsis EIN3-binding F-box 1 and 2 form ubiquitin-protein ligases that repress ethylene action and promote growth by directing EIN3 degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 6803–6808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Cheng, M.C.; Liao, P.M.; Kuo, W.W.; Lin, T.P. The Arabidopsis ethylene response factor1 regulates abiotic stress-responsive gene expression by binding to different cis-acting elements in response to different stress signals. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 1566–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Zhang, F.; Qi, B.; Wang, L.; Zhao, B.; Rode, S.; Riggan, N.D.; Ecker, J.R.; Qiao, H. EIN2-dependent regulation of acetylation of histone H3K14 and non-canonical histone H3K23 in ethylene signalling. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wang, L.; Zhang, F.; Rode, S.; Chin, K.K.; Ko, E.E.; Kim, J.; Lyer, V.R.; Qiao, H. Ethylene induces combinatorial effects of histone H3 acetylation in gene expression in Arabidopsis. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Zhang, F.; Wang, L.; Qi, B.; Zhao, B.; Ko, E.E.; Riggan, N.D.; Chin, K.; Qiao, H. EIN2 mediates direct regulation of histone acetylation in the ethylene response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 10274–10279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Zhang, F.; Wang, L.; Ko, E.E.; Shao, K.; Qiao, H. Histone deacetylases SRT1 and SRT2 interact with ENAP1 to mediate ethylene-induced transcriptional repression. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 153–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Wang, L.; Zhang, F.; Qiao, H. Chromatin regulation in the response of ethylene: Nuclear events in ethylene signaling. Small Methods 2020, 4, 1900288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Wang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, F.; Shao, Z.; Zhao, B.; Huang, A.; Tran, J.; Hernandez, F.V.; Qiao, H. EIN2-directed histone acetylation requires EIN3-mediated positive feedback regulation in response to ethylene. Plant Cell 2021, 33, 322–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Xie, F.; Liu, Q.; Wen, C.-K. Receptor signal output mediated by the ETR1 N terminus is primarily subfamily I receptor dependent. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 492–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Xie, F.; Qiu, L.; Wen, C.-K. Possible modulation of Arabidopsis ETR1 N-terminal signaling by CTR. Plant Signal Behav. 2012, 7, 1243–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. An, F.; Zhao, Q.; Ji, Y.; Li, W.; Jiang, Z.; Yu, X.; Zhang, C.; Han, Y.; He, W.; Liu, Y.; et al. Ethylene-induced stabilization of ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3 and EIN3-LIKE1 is mediated by proteasomal degradation of EIN3 binding F-box 1 and 2 that requires EIN2 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 2384–2401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Qiu, L.P.; Xie, F.; Yu, J.; Wen, C.K. Arabidopsis RTE1 is essential to ethylene receptor ETR1 amino-terminal signaling independent of CTR. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 1263–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Chang, J.; Clay, J.M.; Chang, C. Association of cytochrome b5 with ETR1 ethylene receptor signaling through RTE1 in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2014, 77, 558–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Zheng, F.; Cui, X.; Rivarola, M.; Gao, T.; Chang, C.; Dong, C.-H. Molecular association of Arabidopsis RTH with its homolog RTE1 in regulating ethylene signaling. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2821–2832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Bisson, M.M.; Groth, G. New insight in ethylene signaling: Autokinase activity of ETR1 modulates the interaction of receptors and EIN. Mol. Plant 2010, 3, 882–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Bisson, M.M.; Groth, G. New paradigm in ethylene signaling: EIN2, the central regulator of the signaling pathway, interacts directly with the upstream receptors. Plant Signal Behav. 2011, 6, 164–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Lohrmann, J.; Harter, K. Plant two-component signaling systems and the role of response regulators. Plant Physiol. 2002, 128, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Zhang, J.; Yu, J.; Wen, C.-K. An alternate route of ethylene receptor signaling. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Desikan, R.; Last, K.; Harrett-Williams, R.; Tagliavia, C.; Harter, K.; Hooley, R.; Hancock, J.T.; Neill, S.J. Ethylene-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis occurs via atrbohf-mediated hydrogen peroxide synthesis. Plant J. 2006, 47, 907–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Street, I.H.; Aman, S.; Zubo, Y.; Ramzan, A.; Wang, X.; Shakeel, S.N.; Kieber, J.J.; Schaller, G.E. Ethylene inhibits cell proliferation of the Arabidopsis root meristem. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 338–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Zdaeska, M.; Cuyacot, A.R.; Tarr, P.T.; Yamoune, A.; Szmitkowska, A.; Hrdinová, V.; Gelová, Z.; Meyerowitz, E.M.; Hejátko, J. ETR1 integrates response to ethylene and cytokinins into a single multistep phosphorelay pathway to control root growth. Mol. Plant. 2019, 12, 1338–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Piya, S.; Binder, B.M.; Hewezi, T. Canonical and noncanonical ethylene signaling pathways that regulate Arabidopsis susceptibility to the cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 946–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Nakano, T.; Suzuki, K.; Fujimura, T.; Shinshi, H. Genome-wide analysis of the ERF gene family in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140, 411–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Chang, K.N.; Zhong, S.; Weirauch, M.T.; Hon, G.; Pelizzola, M.; Li, H.; Huang, S.-S.C.; Schmitz, R.J.; Urich, M.A.; Kuo, D.; et al. Temporal transcriptional response to ethylene gas drives growth hormone cross-regulation in Arabidopsis. eLife 2013, 2, e00675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Gasch, P.; Fundinger, M.; Müller, J.T.; Lee, T.; Bailey-Serres, J.; Mustroph, A. Redundant ERF-VII Transcription Factors Bind to an Evolutionarily Conserved cis-Motif to Regulate Hypoxia-Responsive Gene Expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2016, 28, 160–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Müller, M.; Munné-Bosch, S. Ethylene response factors: A key regulatory hub in hormone and stress signaling. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Li, X.; Chen, T.; Li, Y.; Wang, Z.; Cao, H.; Chen, F.; Li, Y.; Soppe, W.J.J.; Li, W.; Liu, Y. ETR1/RDO3 regulates seed dormancy by relieving the inhibitory effect of the ERF12-TPL complex on DELAY OF GERMINATION1 Expression. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 832–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Gibbs, D.J.; Lee, S.C.; Isa, N.M.; Gramuglia, S.; Fukao, T.; Bassel, G.W.; Correia, C.S.; Corbineau, F.; Theodoulou, F.L.; Bailey-Serres, J.; et al. Homeostatic response to hypoxia is regulated by the N-end rule pathway in plants. Nature 2011, 479, 415–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Wang, X.; Gomes, M.M.; Bailly, C.; Nambara, E.; Corbineau, F. Role of ethylene and of the proteolytic N-degron pathway in regulation of Arabidopsis seed dormancy. J. Int. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 2110–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Shu, K.; Liu, X.D.; Xie, Q.; He, Z.H. Two faces of one seed: Hormonal regulation of dormancy and germination. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Beaudoin, N.; Serizet, C.; Gosti, F.; Giraudat, J. Interactions between abscisic acid and ethylene signaling cascades. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 1103–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Ghassemian, M.; Nambara, E.; Cutler, S.; Kawaide, H.; Kamiya, Y.; McCourt, P. Regulation of abscisic acid signaling by the ethylene response pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 1117–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Kornneef, M.; Bentsink, L.; Hilhorst, H. Seed dormancy and germination. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2002, 5, 33–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Cheng, W.H.; Chiang, M.H.; Hwang, S.G.; Lin, P.C. Antagonism between abscisic acid and ethylene in Arabidopsis acts in parallel with the reciprocal regulation of their metabolism and signaling pathways. Plant Mol. Biol. 2009, 71, 61–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Dong, H.; Zhen, Z.; Peng, J.; Chang, L.; Gong, Q.; Wang, N.N. Loss of ACS7 confers abiotic stress tolerance by modulating ABA sensitivity and accumulation in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 4875–4887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Ogawa, M.; Hanada, A.; Yamauchi, Y.; Kuwahara, A.; Kamiya, Y.; Yamaguchi, S. Gibberellin biosynthesis and response during Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 1591–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Karssen, C.M.; Zagórsky, S.; Kepczynski, J.; Groot, S.P.C. Key role for endogenous gibberellins in the control of seed germination. Ann. Bot. 1989, 63, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Brady, S.M.; McCourt, P. Hormone cross-talk in seed dormancy. J. Plant Growth 2003, 22, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Ouaked, F.; Rozhon, W.; Lecourieux, D.; Hirt, H. A MAPK pathway mediates ethylene signaling in plants. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 1282–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Chiwocha, S.D.; Cutler, A.J.; Abrams, S.R.; Ambrose, S.J.; Yang, J.; Ross, A.R.; Kermode, A.R. The etr1-2 mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana affects the abscisic acid, auxin, cytokinin and gibberellin metabolic pathways during maintenance of seed dormancy, moist-chilling and germination. Plant J. 2005, 42, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; Li, K.; Sun, F.; Hu, H.; Li, X.; Zhao, Y.; Han, C.; Zhang, W.; Duan, Y.; et al. Arabidopsis EIN2 modulates stress response through abscisic acid response pathway. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 64, 633–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Subbiah, V.; Reddy, K.J. Interactions between ethylene, abscisic acid and cytokinin during germination and seedling establishment in Arabidopsis. J. Biosci. 2010, 35, 451–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Hendricks, S.B.; Taylorson, R.B. Promotion of seed germination by nitrate, nitrite, hydroxylamine, and ammonium salts. Plant Physiol. 1974, 54, 304–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Whitaker, C.; Beckett, R.P.; Minibayeva, F.V.; Kranner, I. Alleviation of dormancy by reactive oxygen species in Bidens pilosa L. seeds. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2010, 76, 601–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Lin, Y.; Wang, J.; Zu, Y.; Tang, Z. Ethylene antagonizes the inhibition of germination in Arabidopsis induced by salinity by modeling the concentration of hydrogen peroxide. Acta Physiol. Plant 2012, 34, 1895–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Lin, Y.; Yang, L.; Paul, M.; Zu, Y.; Tang, Z. Ethylene promotes germination of Arabidopsis seed under salinity by decreasing reactive oxygen species: Evidence for the involvement of nitric oxide simulated by sodium niroprusside. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 73, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Wang, H.; Tang, S.; Wang, J.; Shen, H.; Yang, L. Interaction between reactive oxygen species and hormones during the breaking of embryo dormancy in Sorbus pohuashanensis by exogenous nitric oxide. J. For. Res. 2021, 33, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Huarte, H.R.; Puglia, G.D.; Prjibelski, A.D.; Raccuia, S.A. Seed transcriptome annotation reveals enhanced expression of genes related to ROS homeostasis and ethylene metabolism at alternating temperatures in wild cardoon. Plants 2020, 9, 1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Ethylene (C2H4) biosynthesis pathway. ACC, 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid; ACO, ACC oxidase; ACS, ACC synthase; KMB, 2-keto-4-methylthiobutyrate; MACC, Malonyl-ACC; MTA, 5-Methylthioadenosine; MTR, 5-Methylthioribose; S-AdoMet, S-adenosylmethionine. Cold differentially inhibits ACS and ACO activities, resulting in ACC accumulation during cold treatment and in an ethylene burst after transfer of the organs at warmer temperatures. Hypoxia inhibits ACO activity, which is nil in anoxia, with oxygen being required for ACO activity. From [28,30,31,32,92].
Figure 1. Ethylene (C2H4) biosynthesis pathway. ACC, 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid; ACO, ACC oxidase; ACS, ACC synthase; KMB, 2-keto-4-methylthiobutyrate; MACC, Malonyl-ACC; MTA, 5-Methylthioadenosine; MTR, 5-Methylthioribose; S-AdoMet, S-adenosylmethionine. Cold differentially inhibits ACS and ACO activities, resulting in ACC accumulation during cold treatment and in an ethylene burst after transfer of the organs at warmer temperatures. Hypoxia inhibits ACO activity, which is nil in anoxia, with oxygen being required for ACO activity. From [28,30,31,32,92].
Plants 13 02674 g001
Figure 2. Schematic model of the ethylene signaling pathway in the presence (A) and in the absence of ethylene (B). The ethylene receptors localized at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) are divided into two subfamilies based on the feature of the histidine kinase motif; subfamily I includes ETR1 and ERS1, while ETR2, ERS2 and EIN4 fall into subfamily II. CTR1 interacts with the five receptors, but it is presented separately in order to indicate its state (active or inactive). In the presence of C2H4 (A), the receptors deactivate CTR1, which, in turn, activates EIN2 that interacts with EIN3 and EIL1, allowing it to activate ethylene response factors (ERFs), resulting in the expression of ethylene responsive genes. EBF 1 and 2 (EIN3-binding F box protein 1 and 2) are able to inhibit EIN3 and EIL1. Without ethylene (B), the receptors-CTR1 complexes maintain CTR1 in an active state, allowing it to phosphorylate EIN2, thus preventing ethylene response through EIN2. In the nucleus, the EIN3/EIL1 are degraded. The turnover of EIN2 is regulated by ETP and the degradation of EIN3 is controlled by EBF. CTR1, Constitutive Triple Response 1; EBF, EIN3 Binding F-Box; EIL3, Ethylene Insensitive-Like protein; EIN2, Ethylene Insensitive 2; EIN3, Ethylene Insensitive 3; EIN4, Ethylene Insensitive 4; ERBPS, Ethylene Responses Element Binding Proteins; ERFs, Ethylene Response Factor; ERS1, ERS2, Ethylene Response Sensor 1 and 2; ETP, EIN2 Targeting protein; ETR1, ETR2, Ethylene Resistant 1 and 2; RAN, Response to Antagonist 1, a copper cofactor. An activated component is shown by color, while an inactivated or repressed component is shown in grey. Modified from [128,130,131,132,133].
Figure 2. Schematic model of the ethylene signaling pathway in the presence (A) and in the absence of ethylene (B). The ethylene receptors localized at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) are divided into two subfamilies based on the feature of the histidine kinase motif; subfamily I includes ETR1 and ERS1, while ETR2, ERS2 and EIN4 fall into subfamily II. CTR1 interacts with the five receptors, but it is presented separately in order to indicate its state (active or inactive). In the presence of C2H4 (A), the receptors deactivate CTR1, which, in turn, activates EIN2 that interacts with EIN3 and EIL1, allowing it to activate ethylene response factors (ERFs), resulting in the expression of ethylene responsive genes. EBF 1 and 2 (EIN3-binding F box protein 1 and 2) are able to inhibit EIN3 and EIL1. Without ethylene (B), the receptors-CTR1 complexes maintain CTR1 in an active state, allowing it to phosphorylate EIN2, thus preventing ethylene response through EIN2. In the nucleus, the EIN3/EIL1 are degraded. The turnover of EIN2 is regulated by ETP and the degradation of EIN3 is controlled by EBF. CTR1, Constitutive Triple Response 1; EBF, EIN3 Binding F-Box; EIL3, Ethylene Insensitive-Like protein; EIN2, Ethylene Insensitive 2; EIN3, Ethylene Insensitive 3; EIN4, Ethylene Insensitive 4; ERBPS, Ethylene Responses Element Binding Proteins; ERFs, Ethylene Response Factor; ERS1, ERS2, Ethylene Response Sensor 1 and 2; ETP, EIN2 Targeting protein; ETR1, ETR2, Ethylene Resistant 1 and 2; RAN, Response to Antagonist 1, a copper cofactor. An activated component is shown by color, while an inactivated or repressed component is shown in grey. Modified from [128,130,131,132,133].
Plants 13 02674 g002
Figure 3. Ethylene signaling transduction pathways. A, the canonical ethylene signaling (cf. Figure 2); B, EIN2 independent signaling pathway involving a MAPK cascade; C, CTR1 independent signaling pathway involving RTE1; D, two-component signaling that relies on the histidine kinase activity of the receptor. AHPs, Arabidopsis Histidine-containing Phosphotransmitter; ARRs, Arabidopsis Response Regulators; CTR1, Constitutive Triple Response; EIN2, Ethylene Insensitive 2; EIN3, Ethylene Insensitive 3; EILs, EIN Like; ETR1, Ethylene Response 1; MKK9, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase; MPK3/6 Protein Kinase 3/6; RTE1, Reversion To Ethylene sensitivity 1. Modified from [91,130,159,165].
Figure 3. Ethylene signaling transduction pathways. A, the canonical ethylene signaling (cf. Figure 2); B, EIN2 independent signaling pathway involving a MAPK cascade; C, CTR1 independent signaling pathway involving RTE1; D, two-component signaling that relies on the histidine kinase activity of the receptor. AHPs, Arabidopsis Histidine-containing Phosphotransmitter; ARRs, Arabidopsis Response Regulators; CTR1, Constitutive Triple Response; EIN2, Ethylene Insensitive 2; EIN3, Ethylene Insensitive 3; EILs, EIN Like; ETR1, Ethylene Response 1; MKK9, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase; MPK3/6 Protein Kinase 3/6; RTE1, Reversion To Ethylene sensitivity 1. Modified from [91,130,159,165].
Plants 13 02674 g003
Figure 4. Interactions between ethylene, abscisic acid, gibberellins, and ROS in the regulation of seed germination. This scheme is based on genetic, molecular, and physiological studies cited in the text on seed responsiveness to C2H4, ABA, GAs, and ROS. Ethylene down-regulates ABA level by inhibiting its synthesis, in particular through NCED, and promoting its catabolism through CYP707. It also down-regulates ABA signaling through ABI5. In addition, ABA inhibits ethylene biosynthesis by reducing ACS and ACO activities. Ethylene also improves GA metabolism, through GA3ox and GA20ox, and GAS signaling, through RGL2 and RGA. ROS produced in relation with stress environments enhance ABA catabolism and both C2H4 and GAs signaling pathways (black arrows). (+) and (−) indicate positive and negative interactions between the components of the signaling cascade. The interrelations between ABA and ethylene, and GAs and ethylene, are in red and blue, respectively. ABA, abscisic acid; ABF, ABA-response element-(ABRE) binding factors; ABI5, ABA INSENSITIVE 5; ACC, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid; ACO, ACC oxidase; ACS, ACC synthase; CTR1, Constitutive Triple Response 1; CYP707, cytochrome P450-dependent mono-oxygenase; EIN2, Ethylene Insensive 2; EIN3, Ethylene Insensitive 3; ERFs, Ethylene Response Factors; ERS1, Ethylene Response Sensor; ETR1, Ethylene Response 1; GAs, gibberellins; GA3ox, GA3-oxidase; GA20ox, GA20-oxidase; GID1, receptor GIBBERELLIN INSENSITIVE DWARF1; NCED, 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase; PA, phaseic acid; PP2C, phosphatase 2C proteins; PYL, PYR1-like; PYR, pyrabactin resistance; RCAR, regulatory components ABA receptor; RGA, REPRESSON OF ga-1-3; RGL2, RGA LIKE 2; SnRK2, subfamily 2 SNF1-related kinase. Modified from [31].
Figure 4. Interactions between ethylene, abscisic acid, gibberellins, and ROS in the regulation of seed germination. This scheme is based on genetic, molecular, and physiological studies cited in the text on seed responsiveness to C2H4, ABA, GAs, and ROS. Ethylene down-regulates ABA level by inhibiting its synthesis, in particular through NCED, and promoting its catabolism through CYP707. It also down-regulates ABA signaling through ABI5. In addition, ABA inhibits ethylene biosynthesis by reducing ACS and ACO activities. Ethylene also improves GA metabolism, through GA3ox and GA20ox, and GAS signaling, through RGL2 and RGA. ROS produced in relation with stress environments enhance ABA catabolism and both C2H4 and GAs signaling pathways (black arrows). (+) and (−) indicate positive and negative interactions between the components of the signaling cascade. The interrelations between ABA and ethylene, and GAs and ethylene, are in red and blue, respectively. ABA, abscisic acid; ABF, ABA-response element-(ABRE) binding factors; ABI5, ABA INSENSITIVE 5; ACC, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid; ACO, ACC oxidase; ACS, ACC synthase; CTR1, Constitutive Triple Response 1; CYP707, cytochrome P450-dependent mono-oxygenase; EIN2, Ethylene Insensive 2; EIN3, Ethylene Insensitive 3; ERFs, Ethylene Response Factors; ERS1, Ethylene Response Sensor; ETR1, Ethylene Response 1; GAs, gibberellins; GA3ox, GA3-oxidase; GA20ox, GA20-oxidase; GID1, receptor GIBBERELLIN INSENSITIVE DWARF1; NCED, 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase; PA, phaseic acid; PP2C, phosphatase 2C proteins; PYL, PYR1-like; PYR, pyrabactin resistance; RCAR, regulatory components ABA receptor; RGA, REPRESSON OF ga-1-3; RGL2, RGA LIKE 2; SnRK2, subfamily 2 SNF1-related kinase. Modified from [31].
Plants 13 02674 g004
Table 1. Some species in which germination is stimulated or seed dormancy is broken by exogenous ethylene or ethephon, an ethylene-releasing compound. Modified from [14,30,31,32,44,45].
Table 1. Some species in which germination is stimulated or seed dormancy is broken by exogenous ethylene or ethephon, an ethylene-releasing compound. Modified from [14,30,31,32,44,45].
Parasitic PlantsWeedsCultivated Plants
Orobanche ramosa
Stiga asiatica
Striga hermonthica
Stiga lutea
Amaranthus caudatus
Arabidopsis thaliana
Chenopodium album
Rumex crispus
Xanthium pennsylvanicum
Spergula arvensis
Amaranthus retroflexus
Arachis hypogea
Beta vulgaris
Brassica oleracea
Helianthus annuus
Lactuca sativa
Malus domestica
Prunus avium
Prunus persica
Table 2. Plant species in which the primary or secondary seed dormancies is broken by exogenous ethylene or ethephon, an ethylene-releasing compound. Modified from [14,30,31,32,44,45].
Table 2. Plant species in which the primary or secondary seed dormancies is broken by exogenous ethylene or ethephon, an ethylene-releasing compound. Modified from [14,30,31,32,44,45].
Type of DormancySpecies References
Primary and secondary dormanciesAmaranthus caudatusLove-lies-bleeding[70,71]
Secondary dormancyAmaranthus paniculatusRed amaranth[72]
Primary dormancyAmaranthus retroflexusRedroot-pigweed[67,73,74]
Primary dormancyArabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis[59,60,61,62]
Primary dormancyArachis hypogaeaPeanut[75]
Primary dormancyBrassica oleraceaChinese cabbage[76]
Primary dormancyChenopodium albumLambs’ quarters[77,78]
Thermo-dormancyCicer arietinumChick-pea[79]
Primary dormancyFagus sylvaticaBeechnut[56]
Primary and secondary dormanciesHelianthus annuusSunflower[57,58,80]
Thermo- and secondary dormanciesLactuca sativaLettuce[81,82,83,84]
Primary dormancyPrunus aviumBird cherry[55]
Primary dormancyPrunus persicaPeach[54]
Primary dormancyPyrus malusApple[49,50,51,52,53]
Primary dormancyRhus coriariaSicilian sumac[85]
Primary and secondary dormanciesRumex crispusCurly dock[63,64]
Primary dormancySisymbrium officinaleHedge mustard[86]
Primary dormancySpergula arvensisSpurry[87]
Primary dormancyStylosanthes humilisPencil flower [88]
Primary dormancyTrifolium subterraneumSubterranean clover[65]
Primary and secondary dormanciesXanthium pennsylvanicumCocklebur[66,67,68,69]
Table 3. Germination percentages obtained after 7 days at 15 °C with dormant (freshly harvested) and non-dormant (after 6 months of dry storage at 20 °C) sunflower embryos in the presence of water and in air (control), exogenous ethylene 50 μL L−1, ACC (1 mM), inhibitors of ethylene synthesis (AOA 1 mM; CoCl2 5 mM), or ethylene action (STS 1 mM; 2,5-NBD 6.6 mL L−1). ACC, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid; AOA, amino-oxyacetic acid; CoCl2, Cobalt chloride; STS, silver thiosulfate; 2,5-NBD, 2,5-norbornadiene. Means of four replicates ± SD. Values having the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 probability level, as determined by Duncan’s test. Modified from [57,58,89].
Table 3. Germination percentages obtained after 7 days at 15 °C with dormant (freshly harvested) and non-dormant (after 6 months of dry storage at 20 °C) sunflower embryos in the presence of water and in air (control), exogenous ethylene 50 μL L−1, ACC (1 mM), inhibitors of ethylene synthesis (AOA 1 mM; CoCl2 5 mM), or ethylene action (STS 1 mM; 2,5-NBD 6.6 mL L−1). ACC, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid; AOA, amino-oxyacetic acid; CoCl2, Cobalt chloride; STS, silver thiosulfate; 2,5-NBD, 2,5-norbornadiene. Means of four replicates ± SD. Values having the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 probability level, as determined by Duncan’s test. Modified from [57,58,89].
Germination (%) in the Presence of
AirC2H4Precursor of C2H4Inhibitor of C2H4
Synthesis
Inhibitor of C2H4
Action
EmbryosWaterWaterACCAOACoCl2STS2,5-NBD
Dormant18 ± 8 a99 ± 1 b98 ± 2 b10 ± 5 a15 ± 4 a10 ± 4 a0 c
Non-dormant98 ± 1 b100 b100 b50 ± 7 d48 ± 5 d78 ± 4 e0 c
Table 4. Dormancy and ABA sensitivity of various mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana affected in the ethylene signaling pathway. ctr1, constitutive triple response 1; ein2, ein4, ein6, ethylene insensitive 2, 4, 6; etr1, ethylene response 1. Modified from [31].
Table 4. Dormancy and ABA sensitivity of various mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana affected in the ethylene signaling pathway. ctr1, constitutive triple response 1; ein2, ein4, ein6, ethylene insensitive 2, 4, 6; etr1, ethylene response 1. Modified from [31].
Mutant or Transgenic
Lines
Gene/LocusSeed DormancyHormone SensitivityReferences
etr1-1ETR1EnhancedC2H4 insensitive[59,60,61,178,179,181,186,187,188,189]
etr1-2ETR1 ABA hypersensibility
etr1-3ETR1EnhancedReduced C2H4 sensitivity
etr1-6ETR1Slighly enhancedMore sensitive to ABA
etr1-8ETR1Enhanced-
ein2-1, ein2-5, ein2-49EIN2EnhancedABA hypersensibility[178,181,187,188,189]
ein4-4EIN4Enhanced-
ein6EIN6EnhancedABA hypersensibility
ctr1-1, ctr1-10CTR1Early germinationReduced ABA sensitivity[178,181,186,188,189]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Corbineau, F. Ethylene, a Signaling Compound Involved in Seed Germination and Dormancy. Plants 2024, 13, 2674. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13192674

AMA Style

Corbineau F. Ethylene, a Signaling Compound Involved in Seed Germination and Dormancy. Plants. 2024; 13(19):2674. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13192674

Chicago/Turabian Style

Corbineau, Françoise. 2024. "Ethylene, a Signaling Compound Involved in Seed Germination and Dormancy" Plants 13, no. 19: 2674. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13192674

APA Style

Corbineau, F. (2024). Ethylene, a Signaling Compound Involved in Seed Germination and Dormancy. Plants, 13(19), 2674. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13192674

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop