Next Article in Journal
Plant Growth Regulation in Cell and Tissue Culture In Vitro
Next Article in Special Issue
Ethanolic Extract from Fruits of Pintoa chilensis, a Chilean Extremophile Plant. Assessment of Antioxidant Activity and In Vitro Cytotoxicity
Previous Article in Journal
Physiological Mechanism through Which Al Toxicity Inhibits Peanut Root Growth
Previous Article in Special Issue
Green Extraction Techniques of Phytochemicals from Hedera helix L. and In Vitro Characterization of the Extracts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of β-Ionone in the Phytotoxicity of the Rhizome of Iris pallida Lam

1
Department of International Environmental and Agricultural Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Saiwai-cho 3-5-8, Fuchu 183-8509, Tokyo, Japan
2
Ministry of Environment, Morodok Techcho (Lot 503) Tonle Bassac, Chamkarmorn, Phnom Penh 120101, Cambodia
3
Department of Crop Science, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra P.O. Box LG 44, Ghana
4
Centre for Biodiversity Conservation, Royal University of Phnom Penh, Russian Federation Boulevard, Toul Kork, Phnom Penh 120404, Cambodia
5
Forest Research Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD 4556, Australia
6
Ministry of Land Management, Urban and Construction, Lot 2005, Street 307, Sangkat Khmuonh, Khan Sen Sok, Phnom Penh 120803, Cambodia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(2), 326; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020326
Submission received: 18 December 2023 / Revised: 15 January 2024 / Accepted: 16 January 2024 / Published: 22 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phytochemical and Biological Activity of Plant Extracts)

Abstract

:
Iris pallida Lam., also known as Sweetie Iris, is a perennial ornamental and medicinal plant that produces a wide range of secondary metabolites. The Sweetie Iris was recently reported to have high allelopathic properties with the potential to be explored in sustainable weed management. This study aimed to identify and evaluate the contributions of compounds involved in the inhibitory effects of the rhizome of Sweetie Iris. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis was used to determine the content of β-ionone in the rhizome of Sweetie Iris. The phytotoxicity of β-ionone was evaluated on lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) and other test plants. The content of β-ionone in the crude extract of Sweetie Iris rhizome was found to be 20.0 mg g−1 by HPLC analysis. The phytotoxicity bioassay showed that β-ionone had strong inhibitory activity on the growth of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) and the other test plants, including Taraxacum officinale, Stellaria media, Eleusine indica, Amaranthus hybridus, Vicia villosa, and Brassica napus. At a concentration of 23.0 µg mL−1, β-ionone inhibited the growth of all test plant species treated. Therefore, β-ionone is an active compound among the other allelopathic substances contained in the rhizome of Sweetie Iris.

1. Introduction

Higher organisms including plants, algae, bacteria, and fungi produce certain bioactive secondary metabolites which can influence (including positive or negative effects) the growth and development of other organisms in a natural ecosystem in a phenomenon called allelopathy [1]. The bioactive secondary metabolites that interfere in the growth and development of other plants are called allelochemicals [2]. Allelochemicals are mostly released from plant tissues through volatilisation or leaching from aerial parts, exudation from roots, and decomposition of plant residues in soil, while there are different kinds of bioactivity and modes of action, the related compounds commonly share similar biosynthetic pathways; however, some metabolites can be produced using diverse biosynthetic pathways [3,4]. Several plants have been reported with plant growth inhibitory potentials, but only a few have shown strong allelopathic effects [5,6]. Current research has focussed on the search for novel compounds from natural plants with demonstrable herbicidal activity to promote sustainable agriculture [7,8], particularly to respond to the increasing demand for organic products over the last decade [9]. The pharmacological properties of medicinal plants were reported to contain biological functions and a strong relationship to allelopathic activity, particularly in ecological weed management [10,11,12,13]. Additionally, the bioactive constituents from medicinal plants produce some physiological effects on humans, animals, and plants in natural ecology [14,15]; some allelochemicals responsible for the growth activities were isolated and identified, such as artemisinin from Artemisia annua [16], ethyl 2-methylacetoacetate from Phragmites communis [17], safranal from Crocus sativus [18], L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) from Mucuna pruriens [19], and rutin from Fagopyrum esculentum [20], carnosic from Rosmarinus officinalis [21], and cyanamide in Vicia villosa [22]. These allelopathic substances can play a crucial role as natural herbicides and can help resolve problems like pest biotypes, health defects, soil, and environmental pollution resulting from the indiscriminate use of synthetic agrochemicals [23]. Weeds pose a more serious threat to crops than other pest species, with up to 50% losses of productive crops expected in Asia, and other continents, if weeds are not properly controlled [24,25,26]. The use of allelopathic species as a cover crop can mitigate weed infestation, insect pests, and disease pathogens as well as provide more fertility and organic matter to enhance soil quality and farm yields [27], with traditional breeding or genetic engineering methods enhancing the biosynthesis and release of allelochemicals [28].
Irises are a group of plants with immense medicinal value, used in the treatment of cancer, inflammation, and bacterial and viral infections [29]. The phytochemicals such as flavones, flavone C-glycosides, isoflavones, terpenoids, xanthones, phenolics, stilbenes, and quinones have been reported among this group of plants [30,31,32]. Although the irises were found to be important sources of isoflavones, Iris pallida Lam. has gained more attention among other species for recent products such as perfume and essential oil [33,34]. Iris pallida, also known as Sweetie Iris, belongs to the Iridaceae family and is native to Croatia. The Sweetie Iris is a perennial herb and is mostly cultivated for essential oil, aromatherapy, and traditional medicine [30,35]. Several parts of Iris pallida including rhizome, leaves, and flowers produce a wide range of secondary metabolites and some phenolic and volatile compounds were also reported, such as squalene from the leaves; isoflavones from the rhizome; and terpenes, alcohols, and esters from the flowers [36,37,38]. Triterpenoids from iris rhizomes have been shown to be the precursors of irones. The aromatic principles from iron extracts have been used in many industries, and the most precious constituents also respond in characteristic scent [29]. Iris pallida was recently reported to have a strong plant growth inhibitory effect exhibited through both leaches and volatiles. By using the sandwich method, the amount of 10 mg of Iris pallida showed high inhibitory effects on the radicle and hypocotyl elongation percentages (4% and 7.1%, respectively). Additionally, Iris pallida also showed an inhibitory effect on the growth of lettuce in the range of 22.1% and 6.7% for radicle and hypocotyl elongation, respectively, by using the dish park method [39,40]. However, its allelopathic substances were yet to be reported. This study, therefore, aimed to identify the allelochemical presented in the Sweetie Iris, including the contributions of its detected compounds to the phytotoxicity of plant growths.

2. Results and Discussions

2.1. The Content of β-Ionone in Sweetie Iris

The identification and quantification of β-ionone in the crude extract of the Sweetie Iris were conducted using uigh-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. The content of β-ionone was detected in the high peak areas during 17 min (Figure 1). The concentration of β-ionone in Sweetie Iris crude extract was found to be 20.0 mg g−1 based on the calibration curve. Beta-ionone (4-(2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-1-en-1-yl) but-3-en-2-one) is a type of terpene compound produced by the degradation of carotenoids [41]. This prominent scented and aromatic molecule is present in several plant species such as the leaves of Iris pallida (Iridaceae) [33], the flowers of Osmanthus fragrans (Oleaceae) [42], and other Rosaceae families such as Rosa bourboniana and Rosa canina and other fruits [43]. Additionally, β-ionone is also found at a different concentration from the essential oil of the leaves of Lawsonia inermis (Lythraceae) [44], the flower of Rosa moschata (Rosaceae) [45], the aerial parts of Viola tricolor (Violaceae) [46], the flower of Medicago marina (Fabaceae) [47], and the maca root of Lepidium meyenii (Brassicaceae) [48].
The concentration of β-ionone was highest in corn, tea, and carrots and found in smaller concentrations in hyssops, peppermints, and safflowers [49]. The content of β-ionone as in Figure 2 was synthesised in early 1893 to clarify the structure of irones, a key flavor compound of Iris pallida [50]. β-ionone is an intermediate key in the synthesis of vitamins A, E, and K [51,52]. It has significant physiological and biological activities such as antioxidant, antimutagenic, and antifungal were also reported [53,54]. β-Ionone is a defence compound among other plant apocarotenoids. It serves as an ecological cue, insect attractant, or repellent, and possesses antibacterial and fungicidal properties [55,56,57]. Other studies have also revealed that the content of β-ionone has antimicrobial effects on some pathogenic plants [58,59,60] and possesses inhibitory activity against Microcystis aeruginosa at high concentrations [61].

2.2. Inhibitory Effects of the Crude Extract and Estimated Contribution of β-Ionone in the Phytotoxicity of Sweetie Iris

In allelopathy, the contribution of compounds acting as allelochemicals is based on their concentration and inhibition activity (specific activity). The specific activity or EC50 is defined as the effective concentration of a compound that causes half-maximal inhibition. Hence, the compounds with high specific activity could be potentially exploited as natural herbicides [62,63]. On the other hand, the total activity of a compound is a function of its specific activity and concentration in the plant. Through this value, the influence of allelopathic effects can be estimated [64]. Therefore, the inhibitory effect of Sweetie Iris in the bioassay was tested on lettuce growth (Figure 3).
The specific activity (EC50) of the crude extract was determined to be 0.3 and 0.4 mg mL−1 for lettuce radicle and hypocotyl, respectively. The application of 10 mg mL−1 of the Sweetie Iris crude extract caused a maximum inhibition of lettuce radicle growth of 96%. However, there is no adverse effect on seed germination at this concentration. The inhibitory effect of β-ionone was also tested on the growth of lettuce to compare and estimate its significant contributions to the inhibitory effect of Sweetie Iris crude extract (i.e., total activity). The total activity estimation approach of plant growth inhibition based on concentration and inhibitory effect (specific activity or EC50) has been adopted to identify many important allelochemicals such as rutin, cyanamide, juglone, angelicin, L-DOPA, and durantanins [20,21,63,65,66,67]. Total activity estimation based on Sweetie Iris was calculated. For instance, the content of β-ionone in 1.0 mg mL−1 of Sweetie Iris was determined to be 20.0 µg mL−1. The lettuce radicle elongation percentage as a result of the 20.0 µg mL−1 of β-ionone (estimated amount in the Sweetie Iris) was determined to be 20%. Hence, the equivalent elongation inhibitory effect of the estimated β-ionone in the 1.0 mg mL−1 of the Sweetie Iris extract was calculated to be 60%. Following the same calculation approach, the inhibitory effect of the Sweetie Iris crude extract on the growth of lettuce was explained by the contribution of β-ionone (Figure 3). Hence, β-ionone was estimated to be a candidate among other responsible compounds contained in the Sweetie Iris crude extract.

2.3. Inhibitory Effects of β-Ionone on the Radicle and Hypocotyl Elongation of Other Plant Species

The growth inhibition on radicle and hypocotyl elongation of other test plants treated with β-ionone was also evaluated. The plant species were selected because they are reported to have a significant impact on the environment and agricultural production. Among the selected species include Taraxacum officinale L., also known as Dandelion, which is a well-known herbaceous perennial plant in the Asteraceae family. This species is native to Europe and is considered an aggressive invasive species worldwide [68]. Dandelion is drought resistant, adapts to a wide range of light and shade intensity, and can grow in a wide range of soil types and pH levels [69]. Moreover, its ability to colonise a wide range of habitats increases due to the presence of phenotypic plasticity [70]. Stellaria media (L.) Villars better known as a Chickweed from the Caryophyllaceae family is a Polycarpic winter annual distributed to compete planted crops in cultivation fields [10,71,72]. Without interference from other plants, the Chickweed can produce around 800 seeds and it takes 7 to 8 years for the seed bank (supply of viable seeds in soil) to be 95% depleted, insuring an infestation for many years [73]. Chickweed contains heterogeneous populations represented by different age classes under natural conditions. Eleusine indica (L.), which belongs to the Poaceae family, was listed as one of the five most noxious weeds worldwide. Eleusine indica known as Goosegrass or Wiregrass impacts 46 crops in more than 60 countries. A single plant of Goosegrass can produce about 140,000 seeds and spread out rapidly. It was reported that a density of 11.6–19.2 Goosegrass plant m−1 of the row reduced 50% of cotton yield loss according to the hyperbolic decay regression model [74,75]. The leaf of Goosegrass was also reported to contain volatile allelopathic compounds [40].
Another selected species was Amaranthus hybridus L., commonly called Amaranth or Pigweed, which is a weedy species that belongs to the Amaranthaceae family and is native to Eastern-North, Central, and Northern-South America. The leaves of green Amaranth can grow up to 20 cm long and the entire plant can grow easily up to 3 m in height. A single gram of Amaranthus hybridus may contain 3000 seeds and also can produce from 100,000 to 600,000 seeds if given space and time [76,77]. The weedy biotype of Amaranthus hybridus has been found to reduce corn and soybean yields in southern Ontario, Canada [78]. The Pigweed can quickly formulate a canopy over shorter vegetables and compete with taller crops, just 1 to 3 green Amaranth plants in 3 m of a corn or soybean row could cause significant yield loss [79]. Vicia villosa Roth L., commonly known as Hairy Vetch, is a winter annual weed that belongs to Fabaceae and is native to Europe and Western Asia. Hairy Vetch is used as a cover crop or mulch for weed suppression in organic no-till agriculture due to it allows for an extended window of biomass production in areas restricted to short growing seasons [80,81]. Hairy Vetch was found to have inhibitory effects on the growth of harmful weeds due to its strong ability to compete for light, moisture, nutrients, etc., which is based on the release of the allelochemical, cyanamide [22,82]. Additionally, recent research also found that Hairy Vetch is more tolerant and sensitive to osmotic pressure in plantations than many plant species including Capsella bursa-pastoris, Myriophyllum aquaticum, and Avena fatua [83,84,85,86]. The last among the selected species was Brassica napus L., commonly known as Canola and or Rapeseed, which belongs to the Brassicaceae family. Canola is a hybrid species resulting from interspecific breeding between Brassica rapa and Brassica oleracea [87]. Rapeseed is an economic species and is used as a source of oil and food and as an ornamental plant [88,89]. Although Rapeseed grows well in winter, it is an annual species which depends on growing conditions [90]. Additionally, this bright-yellow flowering is used as a cover crop in the winter season to prevent soil erosion, and as it produces substantial amounts of biomass; it also suppresses weeds and can improve soil tilth with its root system [91]. Calona is not listed as a noxious weed, but their volunteer plants are considered a weed in managed ecosystems which compete with crops for water, nutrients, and sunlight, thus negatively impacting yields [92,93,94].
Among the test plant species, the content of β-ionone significantly inhibited the growths of all plant species as shown in Figure 4, and the inhibition percentage increased with the increasing extract concentrations. The specific activity values (EC50) were in the range of 15.4–28.0 µg mL−1 and 11.8–31.7 µg mL−1 for radicles and hypocotyl elongation, respectively.
The study observed that β-ionone possesses phytotoxins strongly enough to suppress the growth of all test plant species when treated with 23 µg mL−1. β-ionone inhibited the radicle and hypocotyl elongation of Taraxacum officinale more than the other test plant species, followed by Stellaria media, Eleusine indica, Amaranthus hybridus, Lactuca sativa, Vicia villosa, and Brassica napus. Recent research showed that Taraxacum officinale or Dandelion is an allelopathic plant which had a prominent effect on the germination of Triticum aestivum [95]. In this study, the growth of Dandelion was suppressed by β-ionone at the concentration of 15.4 and 16.0 µg mL−1 for radicle (provide % elongation) and hypocotyl elongation (provide % elongation), respectively. Additionally, this study also observed that Stellaria media or Chickweed was suppressed by β-ionone at the concentration of 26.4–27.2 µg mL−1 and 11.8–31.7 µg mL−1 for radicles and hypocotyls elongation, respectively. The Chickweed is known to have an inhibitory effect on wheat growth by the contribution of water-soluble phenolics to the soil [96]. In a different study, β-ionone was also found to possess inhibitory effects on the growth of Microcystis aeruginosa NIES-843, and the specific activity (EC50) was found to be 21.2 ± 1.9 µg mL−1. The reaction centre of PS II and electron transport at the acceptor side of PS II are the targets responsible for the toxicity of β-ionone based on the transcript expression of genes, polyphasic chlorophyll a (Chl a) fluorescence transients, and ultrastructural examinations using TEM [97].
Also, this study showed that the radicles were inhibited more than hypocotyl elongations for all the test plant species. These findings were consistent with previous results, which showed low mitotic division at the radicle apex presented in higher radicle inhibition in lettuce when treated with False Yellowhead (Dittrichia viscose L.) leaf extracts [98]. Several other studies have also reported similar results using different plant materials [99,100,101,102]. Generally, the radicles are more inhibited than hypocotyl elongation because radicles are the first organs to absorb allelochemicals from the environment [103], and the permeability of allelochemicals into radicle tissue is higher than that of hypocotyl [104]. The results indicated that the β-ionone concentration contained in the rhizome of Sweetie Iris has strong allelopathic effects on the growth of other species.

3. Conclusions

This study reported the plant growth inhibitory effects of Sweetie Iris crude extract and the corresponding compound β-ionone. At the concentration of 23.0 µg mL−1, β-ionone inhibited 50% of the growth of many weeds and plant species. Hence, β-ionone was identified as a bioactive compound in Sweetie Iris, which is responsible for strong allelopathic effects on other species. This study could be used as a piece of baseline information for future evaluation of the effects of β-ionone on intact plants and its mode of action, including the application to practical agriculture by mixed planting of Sweetie Iris or exploiting new plant active chemicals as a derivative of β-ionone.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Samples and Chemicals for the Bioassay

The rhizome of Sweetie Iris (Iris pallida Lam.) was collected at the Phnom Kulen National Park (PKNP) (Figure 5), Cambodia which is a known place of medicinal and cultural values in the north-western part of the country. The national park is in the two districts of Banteay Srey and Svay Luer of Siem Reap province. The area is elevated up to 500 m and falls under two main classes, evergreen forest and deciduous forest, which were believed to be the birthplace of the Khmer Empire more than 1200 years ago. The three main aspects that make the national park an important place for conservation are critical ecological attributes, ecosystem services, and social functions. PKNP is approximately home to 1300 to 1500 flora species; however, only 775 species were reported in taxonomy [105]. Recent studies have shown that at least more than 70 plant species were found to have allelopathic potentials; Iris pallida demonstrated high inhibitory effects among the 195 screening plant species evaluated using the sandwich and dish park method [39,40].
Sweetie Iris rhizome samples were dried in an oven at 60 °C for 3 h at PKNP before being transported to the Laboratory of the International Agrobiological Resources and Allelopathy, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Japan, for experimentation. The collected plant materials were authorised by the Ministry of Environment of Cambodia under the national ABS regulation system. All plant materials were exported to Japan through the quarantine system. Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) was selected as a test plant material in the bioassay due to its reliability in germination and its susceptibility to inhibitory and stimulatory chemicals [106]. The pure compound (β-ionone) was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry (TCI, Tokyo, Japan). Seven seed plant species were selected and purchased from seed companies in Japan, including TAKII SEED (Kyoto, Japan), SNOW BRAND SEED Co., Ltd. (Hokkaido, Japan), and SAKATA SEED Corp. (Yokohama, Japan). The seeds belong to six representative families, including Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn (Poaceae), Stellaria media (L.) Villars (Caryophyllaceae), Taraxacum officinale L. and Lactuca sativa L. cv. Legacy (Asteraceae), Amaranthus hybridus L. (Amaranthaceae), (Apiaceae), Vicia villosa Roth L. (Fabaceae), and Brassica napus L. (Brassicaceae).

4.2. Bioassay for the Phytotoxic Activity of Sweetie Iris and β-Ionone

Oven-dried rhizome of Sweetie Iris (100 mg) was soaked in a glass percolator with 10 mL of MeOH for 48 h at room temperature. The solution was filtered through No.1 filter paper (Advantech Toyo Roshi Kaisha, Tokyo, Japan), centrifuged (13,000 rpm, 10 min), and after that, the supernatants were collected. The specific activity of crude extracts was evaluated using lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) as a test plant material. The original crude extract was diluted to the following concentrations: 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, and 10 mg mL−1. Filter paper (27 mm ø, Toyo Roshi Kaisha, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was placed in a glass Petri dish (27 mm ø). A total of 0.7 mL of the test solution was added to the filter paper and dried completely in vacuo. Five pre-germinated seedlings were placed on the filter paper, and 0.7 mL of distilled water was added and incubated (CN-25C, Mitsubishi Elec., Tokyo, Japan) for three days in dark conditions at a temperature of 22 °C. Three replications were set for each treatment. The control treatment did not have any crude extract but only distilled water. After incubation, the germination percentage of radicle and hypocotyl growth were measured. The phytotoxicity of β-ionone on several other selected plant species was also evaluated under laboratory conditions. The inhibitory activity bioassay using β-ionone was performed in the same conditions described above, but a total of 0.7 mL of 0.05% Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) test solution was added to the filter paper without drying in vacuo, and the following concentration of crude extracts were 2.5, 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 μg mL−1. Three replications were set for each treatment. The radicle and hypocotyl lengths were measured after the incubation period (the test plant species were measured on day three) and the elongation percentage was calculated using Equation (1), which was modified from Chandra et al. [107].
Elongation % = X Y × 100

4.3. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Analysis (HPLC)

A total of 50 mg of the rhizome of Sweetie Iris (Iris pallida) was accurately weighed into a 50 mL tube and extracted as shown in the extraction procedure. An aliquot of the extract after centrifugation was filtered through a 0.2 μm syringe filter before injection (10 µL). HPLC analysis was performed using an LC-20AD liquid chromatograph (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). An Itertsil ODS 2 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particles, GL Science Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was used. Mobile phases A and B were 0.1% phosphoric with water and MeOH, respectively. The column temperature was maintained at 30 °C, and the flow rate of the mobile phase was set at 0.5 mL min−1. The following multi-step gradient with different proportions of mobile phase B was applied: 0 min, 10% B; 5 min, 40% B; 10 min, 80% B; 20 min, 20% B and maintained until 30 min before injection (20 μL). The analysis was monitored using an SPD-M20A detector at 265 nm. Quantification was obtained by comparing the peak areas of the target compounds with the abundance of these compounds in the corresponding standards used in the calibration curve. All chemical analyses were performed in three replications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, Y.S., K.S.A., S.S. and Y.F.; methodology, Y.S., K.S.A. and Y.F.; validation, T.M., C.S., J.S. and K.S.A.; Resources, Y.S., S.S. and Y.F.; Funding acquisition, S.S. and Y.F.; data curation, Y.S., J.S. and C.S.; writing—initial draft preparation, Y.S.; writing—review and editing, Y.S., K.S.A., C.S., J.S., T.M. and Y.F.; supervision, T.M., S.S. and Y.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Environment, Cambodia, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan through JICE/JDS Programme, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology and Japan Allelopathy Laboratory (JAL).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology through JICE/JDS Programme for providing the scholarship to the first author at the Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology. We also gratefully acknowledge the Ministry of Environment, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport, the Provincial Department of Environment in Siem Reap Province, and the Local Communities at Phnom Kulen National Park, Cambodia for supporting and assisting this research study at the ground, including sample collection and transferring for the experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. International Allelopathy Society (IAS). Constitution and Bylaws. Drawn Up during the First World Congress on Allelopathy; A Science for the Future; International Allelopathic Society: Cádiz, Spain, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  2. Weir, T.L.; Park, S.W.; Vivanco, J.M. Biochemical and Physiological Mechanisms Mediated by Allelochemicals. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2004, 7, 472–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Barazani, O.; Friedman, J. Allelopathic Bacteria and Their Impact on Higher Plants. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2001, 27, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Latif, S.; Chiapusio, G.; Weston, L.A. Allelopathy and the Role of Allelochemicals in Plant Defence. Adv. Bot. Res. 2017, 82, 19–54. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fujii, Y. Screening and future exploitation of allelopathic plants as alternative herbicides with special reference to hairy vetch. J. Crop Prod. 2001, 4, 257–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xuan, T.D.; Tsuzuki, E. Effects of application of alfalfa pellet on germination and growth of weeds. J. Crop Prod. 2001, 4, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Felix, D.D. Plant flavonoids: Biological molecules for useful exploitation. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1995, 22, 87–99. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kropff, M.J.; Walter, H. EWRS and the challenges for weed research at the start of a new millennium. Weed Res. 2000, 40, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Willer, H.; Klicher, L. The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2009; FIBL-IFOAM Report; IFOAM: Bonn, Germany; FiBL: Frick, Switzerland; ITC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rice, E.L. Allelopathy, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  11. Appiah, K.S.; Mardani, H.K.; Osivand, A.; Kpabitey, S.; Amoatey, C.A.; Oikawa, Y.; Fujii, Y. Exploring Alternative Use of Medicinal Plants for Sustainable Weed Management. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wink, M. Introduction: Biochemistry, Role and Biotechnology of Secondary Metabolites. Annu. Plant Rev. 1999, 3, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mominul, I.A.K.M.; Sabina, Y.; Jamal, R.S.Q.; Abdul, S.J.; Parvez, M.D.A. Allelopathy of Medicinal Plants: Current Status and Future Prospects in Weed Management. Agric. Sci. 2018, 9, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sharma, S.; Devkota, A. Allelopathic Potential and Phytochemical Screening of Four Medicinal Plants of Nepal. Sci. World 2014, 12, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fujii, Y.; Azizi, M. Allelopathic effect of some medicinal plant substances on seed germination of Amaranthus retroflexus and Portulaca oleraceae. Acta Hortic. 2006, 699, 61–68. [Google Scholar]
  16. Duke, S.O.; Vaughn, K.C.; Croom, E.M., Jr.; Elsohly, H.N. Artemisinin, a constituent of annual wormwood Artemisia annua is a selective phytotoxin. Weed Sci. 1987, 35, 499–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, F.M.; Hu, H.Y. Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Antialgal Allelochemical from Phragmites communis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 71, 6545–6553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mardani, H.; Sekine, T.; Azizi, M.; Mishyna, M.; Fujii, Y. Identification of Safranal as the Main Allelochemical from Saffron (Crocus sativus). Nat. Prod. Commun. 2015, 10, 775–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fujii, Y.; Shibuya, T.; Tamaki, Y. Allelopathy of Velvetbean: Determination and Identification of L-DOPA as a Candidate of Allelopathic Substances. Japan Agric. Res. Q. 1992, 25, 238–247. [Google Scholar]
  20. Golisz, A.; Lata, B.; Gawronski, S.W.; Fujii, Y. Specific and Total Activities of the Allelochemicals Identified in Buckwheat. Weed Biol. Manag. 2007, 7, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Appiah, K.S.; Mardani, H.K.; Omari, R.A.; Eziah, V.Y.; Ofosu-Anim, J.; Onwona-Agyeman, S.; Amoatey, C.A.; Kawada, K.; Katsura, K.; Oikawa, Y.; et al. Involvement of Carnosic Acid in the Phytotoxicity of Rosmarinus officinalis Leaves. Toxins 2018, 10, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kamo, T.; Hiradate, S.; Fujii, Y. First Isolation of Natural Cyanamide as a Possible Allelochemical from Hairy Vetch Vicia villosa. J. Chem. Ecol. 2003, 29, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Temesgen, B.; Workissa, Y. Review on the role of Allelopathy in pest management and crop production. Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. 2021, 8, 88–100. [Google Scholar]
  24. Swarbrick, J.T.; Mercado, B.L. Weed Science and Weed Control in Southeast Asia; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1987; p. 81. [Google Scholar]
  25. Oerke, E.C.; Dehne, H.W. Global crop production and the efficacy of crop protection—Current situation and future trends. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 1997, 103, 203–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Karim, S.M.R. Relative yields of crops and crop losses due to weed competition in Bangladesh. Pak. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 1998, 41, 318–324. [Google Scholar]
  27. Farooq, M.; Jabran, K.; Cheema, Z.A.; Wahid, A.; Siddique, K.H. The role of allelopathy in agricultural pest Muhammad Farooq. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 493–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ferguson, J.J.; Rathinasabapathi, B.; Chase, C.A. Allelopathy: How Plants Suppress Other Plants. Edis 2013, 3, hs186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hanawa, F.; Tahara, S.; Mizutani, J. Isoflavonoids produced by Iris pseudacorus leaves treated with cupric chloride. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, H.; Cui, Y.; Zhao, C. Flavonoids of the genus Iris (Iridaceae). Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2010, 10, 643–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Iwashina, T.; Ootani, S. Flavonoids of the genus Iris; structures, distribution and function: Review. Ann. Tsukuba Bot. Gard. 1998, 17, 147–183. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kassak, P. Secondary metabolites of the chosen genus Iris species. Acta Univ. Agric. Silv. Mendel. Brun. 2012, 60, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kukula-Koch, W.; Sieniawska, E.; Widelski, J.; Urjin, O.; Głowniak, P.; Skalicka-Woźniak, K. Major secondary metabolites of Iris spp. Phytochem. Rev. 2015, 14, 51–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lim, T.K. Edible Medicinal and Non-Medicinal Plants: Modified Stems, Roots and Bulbs; Springer International Publishing AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; Volume 11, pp. 3–28. [Google Scholar]
  35. DeBaggio, T.; Tucker, A.O. The Encyclopedia of Herbs: A Comprehensive Reference to Herbs of Flavor and Fragrance; Timber Press Inc.: Portland, OR, USA, 2009; pp. 266–267. [Google Scholar]
  36. Yuan, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, C.; Chen, X.; Li, F. Identification of Floral Scent Profiles in Bearded Irises. Molecules 2019, 24, 1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mykhailenko, O. Composition of Volatile Oil of Iris pallida Lam. From Ukraine. Turk. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 15, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Roger, B.; Jeannot, V.; Fernandez, X.; Cerantola, S.; Chahboun, J. Characterisation and Quantification of Flavonoids in Iris germanica L. and Iris pallida Lam. Resinoids from Morocco. Phytochem. Anal. 2012, 23, 450–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sothearith, Y.; Appiah, K.S.; Motobayashi, T.; Watanabe, I.; Somaly, C.; Sugiyama, A.; Fujii, Y. Evaluation of Allelopathic Potentials from Medicinal Plant Species in Phnom Kulen National Park, Cambodia by the Sandwich Method. Sustainability 2021, 13, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sothearith, Y.; Appiah, K.S.; Mardani, H.; Motobayashi, T.; Yoko, S.; Eang Hourt, K.; Sugiyama, A.; Fujii, Y. Determination of the Allelopathic Potential of Cambodia’s Medicinal Plants Using the Dish Pack Method. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Silva, I.; Coimbra, M.A.; Barros, A.; Marriott, P.; Rocha, S.M. Can volatile organic compounds be markers of sea salt. Food Chem. 2015, 169, 102–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, L.M.; Li, M.T.; Jin, W.W.; Zhang, S.Q.; Yu, L.J. Variations in the components of Osmanthus fragrans Lour. essential oil at different stages of flowering. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 233–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ibdah, M.; Azulay, Y.; Portnoy, V.; Wasserman, B.; Bar, E.; Meir, A.; Burger, Y.; Hirschberg, J.; Schaffer, A.A.; Katzir, N. Functional characterization of CmCCD1, a carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase from melon. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 1579–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Oyedeji, A.O.; Ekundayo, O.; Koenig, W.A. Essential oil composition of Lawsonia inermis L. leaves from Nigeria. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2005, 17, 403–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Honarvar, M.; Javidnia, K.; Khosh-Khui, M. Essential oil composition of fresh and dried flowers of Rosa moschata from Iran. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2011, 47, 826–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Anca, T.; Philippe, V.; Ilioara, O.; Mircea, T. Composition of essential oils of Viola tricolor and V. arvensis from Romania. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2009, 45, 91–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Flamini, G.; Luigi Cioni, P.; Morelli, I.; Ceccarini, L.; Andolfi, L.; Macchia, M. Composition of the essential oil of Medicago marina L. from the coastal dunes of Tuscany, Italy. Flavour Fragr. J. 2003, 18, 460–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tellez, M.R.; Khan, I.A.; Kobaisy, M.; Schrader, K.K.; Dayan, F.E.; Osbrink, W. Composition of the essential oil of Lepidium meyenii (Walp.). Phytochemistry 2002, 61, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dionísio, A.P.; Molina, G.; Souza, C.D.; Santos, R.D.; Bicas, J.L.; Pastore, G.M. 11—Natural flavorings from biotechnology for foods and beverages. In Natural Food Additives, Ingredients and Flavourings; Baines, D., Seal, R., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2012; pp. 231–259. ISBN 9781845698119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Winterhalter, P.; Rouseff, R. Carotenoid-Derived Aroma Compounds: An Introduction. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 7, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  51. Lalko, J.; Lapczynski, A.; McGinty, D.; Bhatia, S.; Letizia, C.S.; Api, A.M. Fragrance material review on beta-ionone. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2007, 45, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Elizabeth, A.B.; John, W.S.; Christine, K.S.; Wolfgang, W.S. Flavor Trivia, and Tomato Aroma: Biochemistry and Possible Mechanisms for Control of Important Aroma Components. Hortscience 2000, 35, 1013–1022. [Google Scholar]
  53. Gomes, C.M.R.; Daniela, M.M.D.; Francisco, J.R.P. Study on the mutagenicity and antimutagenicity of beta-ionone in the Salmonella/microsome assay. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2006, 44, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Janakiram, N.B.; Cooma, I.; Mohammed, A.; Steele, V.E. Beta-ionone inhibits colonic aberrant crypt foci formation in rats, suppresses cell growth, and induces retinoid X receptor-alpha in human colon cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008, 7, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Shi, J.; Cao, C.; Xu, J.; Zhou, C. Research advances on biosynthesis, regulation, and biological activities of apocarotenoid aroma in horticultural plants. J. Chem. 2020, 11, 2526956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Aloum, L.; Alefishat, E.; Adem, A.; Petroianu, G. Ionone Is More than a Violet’s Fragrance: A Review. Molecules 2020, 25, 5822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Giuliano, G.; Al-Babili, S.; Lintig, J.V. Carotenoid oxygenases: Cleave it or leave it. Trends Plant Sci. 2003, 8, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Schiltz, P. Action inhibitrice de la β-ionone au cours du développement de Peronospora tabacina. Ann. Tabac. 1974, 11, 207–216. [Google Scholar]
  59. Mikhlin, E.D.; Radina, V.P.; Dmitrovskii, A.A.; Blinkova, L.P.; Butova, L.G. Antifungal and antimicrobic activity of β-ionone and vitamin A derivatives. Prikl. Biokhim. Mikrobiol. 1983, 19, 795–803. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  60. Utama, I.M.S.; Wills, R.B.H.; Ben-Yehoshua, S.; Kuek, C. In vitro efficacy of plant volatiles for inhibiting the growth of fruit and vegetable decay microorganisms. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 6371–6637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Wu, Z.B.; Gao, Y.N.; Wang, J.; Liu, B.Y.; Zhou, Q.H. Allelopathic effects of phenolic compounds present in submerged macrophytes on Microcystis aeruginosa. Allelopathy J. 2009, 23, 403–410. [Google Scholar]
  62. Hiradate, S. Strategies for searching bioactive compounds: Total activity vs. specific activity. In Proceedings of the 227th ACS National Meeting, Anaheim, CA, USA, 28 March–1 April 2004; No. AGFD7. American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  63. Fujii, Y.; Hiradate, S. A critical survey of allelochemicals in action–the importance of total activity and the weed suppression equation. In Proceedings of the 4th World Congress of Allelopathy “Establishing the Scientific Base”, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia, 21–26 August 2005; The Regional Institute: Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia, 2005; pp. 73–76. [Google Scholar]
  64. Hiradate, S. Isolation strategies for finding bioactive compounds: Specific activity vs. total activity. In Natural Products for Pest Management; Rimando, A.M., Duke, S.O., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series 927; ACS Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2016; pp. 113–126. [Google Scholar]
  65. Hiradate, S.; Ohse, K.; Furubayashi, A.; Fujii, Y. Quantitative Evaluation of Allelopathic Potentials in Soils: Total Activity Approach. Weed Biol. Manag. 2010, 58, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Morikawa, C.I.O.; Miyaura, R.; Kamo, T.; Hiradate, S.; Chávez Pérez, J.A.; Fujii, Y. Isolation of Umbelliferone as a Principal Allelochemical from the Peruvian Medicinal Plant Diplostephium foliosissimum (Asteraceae). Rev. Soc. Quim. Peru. 2011, 77, 285–291. [Google Scholar]
  67. Mishyna, M.; Laman, N.; Prokhorov, V.; Fujii, Y. Angelicin as the Principal Allelochemical in Heracleum sosnowskyi. Nat. Commun. 2015, 10, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Holm, L.; Doll, L.; Holm, E. World Weeds. Natural Histories and Distributions; John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  69. Stewart, W.S.M.; Neumann, S.; Collins, L.L. The biology of Canadian weeds. 117. Taraxacum officinale G. H. Weber ex Wiggers. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2002, 82, 825–853. [Google Scholar]
  70. Breuste, L.H. Investigations of the urban street tree forest of Mendoza, Argentina. Urban Ecosyst. 2013, 16, 801–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rice, E.L. Biological Control of Weeds and Plant Diseases: Advances in Applied Allelopathy; University of Oklahoma Press: Norman, OK, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  72. Mann, H.H.; Barnes, T.W. The competition between barley and certain weeds under controlled conditions. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1950, 37, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wilen, C.A. Chickweeds: Integrated Pest Management for Home Gardeners and Landscape Professionals. Pest Notes; University of California: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2006; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  74. Chin, H.F. Weed seed—A potential source of danger. In Proceedings of the Plant Protection Seminar, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 22–23 September 1979; Kwee, L.T., Ed.; Malaysian Plant Protection Society: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1979; pp. 115–119. [Google Scholar]
  75. Holm, L.G.; Pancho, J.V.; Herberger, J.P.; Plucknett, D.L. The World’s Worst Weeds—Distribution and Biology, 1st ed.; Hawaii University Press: Honolulu, HI, USA, 1977; pp. 52–53. [Google Scholar]
  76. Sauer, J.D. Revision of the dioecious amaranths. Madroño 1955, 13, 5–46. [Google Scholar]
  77. Weave, S.E.; McWilliams, E.L. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 44. Amaranthus retroflexus L., A. powellii S. Wats. and A. hybridus L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1980, 60, 1215–1234. [Google Scholar]
  78. Moolani, M.K.; Knake, E.L.; Slife, F.W. Competition of smooth pigweed with corn and soybeans. Weeds 1954, 12, 126–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Massinga, R.A.; Currie, R.S.; Horak, M.J.; Boyer, J. Interference of Palmer amaranth in corn. Weed Sci. 2001, 49, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. USDA Forest Service. Weed of the Week—Hairy Vetch. 4 August 2016. Available online: https://www.na.fs.fed.us/fhp/invasive_plants/weeds/hairy-vetch.pdf (accessed on 10 September 2017).
  81. Halde, C.; Gulden, G.H.; Entz, M.H. Selecting Cover Crop Mulches for Organic Rotational No-Till Systems in Manitoba, Canada. Agron. J. 2014, 106, 1193–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Teasdale, J.R.; Devine, T.E.; Mosjidis, J.A.; Bellinder, R.R.; Beste, C.E. Growth and development of hairy vetch cultivars in the Northeastern United States as influenced by planting and harvesting date. Agron. J. 2004, 96, 1266–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wang, H.Z.; Wang, L.P.; Bai, S.; Guo, W.L.; Wang, J.X.; Liu, W.T. Germination ecology of giant chickweed (Myosoton aquaticum). Weed Sci. 2020, 68, 619–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Lv, X.S.; Zhang, L.L.; Li, Q.; Zhao, K.P.; Wang, J.X. Influence of environmental factors on seed germination and seedling emergence of Capsella bursa-pastoris. Chin. Agron. Sci. Bull. 2017, 33, 68–72. [Google Scholar]
  85. Fernandez-Quinantilla, C.; Andujar, J.L.G.; Appleby, A.P. Characterization of the germination and emergence response to temperature and soil moisture of Avena fatua and A. sterilis. Weed Res. 1990, 30, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Yang, C.; Sun, R.; Lu, X.; Jin, T.; Peng, X.; Zhang, N.; Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Liu, W. Seed-Germination Ecology of Vicia villosa Roth, a Cover Crop in Orchards. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Downey, R.K.; Rimmer, S.R. Agronomic Improvements in Oilseed Brassicas. Adv. Agron. 1993, 50, 1–66. [Google Scholar]
  88. Al-Shehbaz, I.A.; Beilstein, M.A.; Kellogg, E.A. Systematics and phylogeny of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae): An overview. Plant Syst. Evol. 2006, 259, 89–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Meyer, R.S.; Purugganan, M.D. Evolution of crop species: Domestication and diversification. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013, 14, 840–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Gulden, R.H.; Warwick, S.I.; Thomas, A.G. The biology of Canadian weeds. 137. Brassica napus L. and B. rapa L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2008, 88, 951–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Alford, D.V. “Rapeseed”. Agricultural Marketing Resource Center. AgMRC. 2018. Available online: https://handwiki.org/wiki/Biology:Rapeseed (accessed on 20 March 2019).
  92. Harker, K.N.; Clayton, G.W.; Blakshaw, R.E.; O’Donovan, J.T.; Johnson, E.N.; Gan, Y.; Holm, F.A.; Sapford, K.L.; Irvine, R.B.; Van Acker, R.C. Persistence of glyphosate-resistant canola in western Canadian cropping systems. Agron. J. 2006, 98, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Légère, A.; Simard, M.J.; Thomas, A.; Pageau, D.; Lajeunesse, J.; Warwick, S.I.; Derksen, D. Presence and persistence of volunteer canola in Canadian cropping systems. In Proceedings of the The BCPC Conference, Weeds, Brighton, UK, 13–15 November 2001; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  94. Thomas, P. Canola Growers Manual; Canola Council of Canada: Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  95. Naila, S.; Haq, Z.U.; Abdulllah; Salam, A. Allelopathic Effect of Taraxacum officinale L. on Germination and Physiology of Wheat. In ustainable Intensification for Agroecosystem Services and Management; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 711–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Inderjit; Dakshini, K.M.M. Allelopathic interference of chickweed, Stellaria media with seedling growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Can. J. Bot. 2011, 76, 1317–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Jihai, S.; Yao, X.; Zhongjie, W.; Yongguang, J.; Gongliang, Y.; Xin, P.; Renhui, L. Elucidating the toxicity targets of beta-ionone on photosynthetic system of Microcystis aeruginosa NIES-843 (Cyanobacteri). Aquat. Toxicol. 2011, 104, 48–55. [Google Scholar]
  98. Levizio, E.; Karageorgou, P.; Psaras, G.K.; Manesta, Y. Inhibitory effects of water-soluble leaf leachates from Dittrichia viscosa on lettuce root growth, statocyte development, and graviperception. Flora Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants 2002, 197, 152–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Stachon, W.J.; Zimdahl, R.L. Allelopathic activity of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) in Colorado. Weed Sci. 1980, 28, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Aliotta, G.; Cafiero, G.; Fiorentino, A.; Strumia, S. Inhibition of radish germination and root growth by coumarin and phenylpropanoids. J. Chem. Ecol. 1993, 19, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Salam, A.; Kato, N.H. Evaluation of Allelopathic Potential of Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) Against Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Different Test Plant Species. Int. J. Sustain. Agric. 1020, 2, 20–25. [Google Scholar]
  102. Pukclari, P.; Kato, N.H. Allelopathic activity of Piper sarmentosum Roxb. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2011, 10, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Salam, M.A.; Kato, N.H. Allelopathic potential of methanol extract of Bangladeshi rice seedlings. Asian J. Crop Sci. 2010, 2, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Nishida, N.; Tamotsu, S.; Nagata, N.; Saito, C.; Sakai, A. Allelopathic effects of volatile monoterpenoides produced by Salvia leucophylla: Inhibition of cell proliferation and DNA synthesis in the root apical meristem of Brassica campestris seedlings. J. Chem. Ecol. 2005, 31, 1187–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Hayes, B.; Mould, A.; Khou, E.H.; Hartmann, T.; Hoa, K.; Calame, T.; Boughey, K.; Yon, T. A Biodiversity Assessment of Phnom Kulen National Park, with Recommendations for Management. Assessment Survey; Ministry of Environment: Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  106. Fujii, Y.; Shibuya, T.; Yasuda, T. Survey of Japanese weed and crops for the detection of water-extractable allelopathic chemicals using Richards’ function fitted to lettuce germination test. Weed Res. Jpn. 1990, 35, 362–370. [Google Scholar]
  107. Chandra, S.; Chatterjee, P.; Dey, P.; Bhattacharya, S. Allelopathic Effect of Ashwagandha against the Germination and Radicle Growth of Cicer Arietinum and Triticum Aestivum. Pharmacogn. Res. 2012, 4, 166. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. High-performance liquid chromatography analysis of (a) Iris pallida Lam. and (b) β-ionone.
Figure 1. High-performance liquid chromatography analysis of (a) Iris pallida Lam. and (b) β-ionone.
Plants 13 00326 g001
Figure 2. Chemical structure of β-ionone.
Figure 2. Chemical structure of β-ionone.
Plants 13 00326 g002
Figure 3. Estimated contribution of β-ionone in the Sweetie Iris crude extract on (a) the radicle and (b) hypocotyl of lettuce growth. Each datum was an average of three replications.
Figure 3. Estimated contribution of β-ionone in the Sweetie Iris crude extract on (a) the radicle and (b) hypocotyl of lettuce growth. Each datum was an average of three replications.
Plants 13 00326 g003
Figure 4. Effect of β-ionone on the (a) radicle and (b) hypocotyl elongation of test plant species. The data are the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three replications.
Figure 4. Effect of β-ionone on the (a) radicle and (b) hypocotyl elongation of test plant species. The data are the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three replications.
Plants 13 00326 g004
Figure 5. Photo of Iris pallida Lam. and its rhizome that was taken from PKNP, Cambodia.
Figure 5. Photo of Iris pallida Lam. and its rhizome that was taken from PKNP, Cambodia.
Plants 13 00326 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sothearith, Y.; Appiah, K.S.; Sophea, C.; Smith, J.; Samal, S.; Motobayashi, T.; Fujii, Y. Influence of β-Ionone in the Phytotoxicity of the Rhizome of Iris pallida Lam. Plants 2024, 13, 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020326

AMA Style

Sothearith Y, Appiah KS, Sophea C, Smith J, Samal S, Motobayashi T, Fujii Y. Influence of β-Ionone in the Phytotoxicity of the Rhizome of Iris pallida Lam. Plants. 2024; 13(2):326. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020326

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sothearith, Yourk, Kwame Sarpong Appiah, Chhin Sophea, Jady Smith, Say Samal, Takashi Motobayashi, and Yoshiharu Fujii. 2024. "Influence of β-Ionone in the Phytotoxicity of the Rhizome of Iris pallida Lam" Plants 13, no. 2: 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020326

APA Style

Sothearith, Y., Appiah, K. S., Sophea, C., Smith, J., Samal, S., Motobayashi, T., & Fujii, Y. (2024). Influence of β-Ionone in the Phytotoxicity of the Rhizome of Iris pallida Lam. Plants, 13(2), 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020326

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop