Next Article in Journal
Comprehensive Evaluation of Appreciation of Rhododendron Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process
Next Article in Special Issue
ABA Inhibits Rice Seed Aging by Reducing H2O2 Accumulation in the Radicle of Seeds
Previous Article in Journal
Prefoldin Subunits and Its Associate Partners: Conservations and Specificities in Plants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Analysis of the Effect of Gamma-, Electron, and Proton Irradiation on Transcriptomic Profile of Hordeum vulgare L. Seedlings: In Search for Molecular Contributors to Abiotic Stress Resilience
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Potential Response Patterns of Endogenous Hormones in Cliff Species Opisthopappus taihangensis and Opisthopappus longilobus under Salt Stress

by Yimeng Zhang 1,†, Yuexin Shen 1,†, Mian Han 1, Yu Su 1, Xiaolong Feng 1, Ting Gao 1, Xiaojuan Zhou 1, Qi Wu 1, Genlou Sun 2,* and Yiling Wang 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 18 December 2023 / Revised: 8 February 2024 / Accepted: 15 February 2024 / Published: 19 February 2024

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

From this reviewer's perspective, the research approach, methods and inferences drawn are sound and compelling. My concerns primarily revolve around the rationale for your study of this pair of Opisthopappus species--why are they important to the broader plant community (vis-a-vis salt stress tolerance). Might their tolerance to drought and cold be related to their salt tolerance? That could be an extraordinarily rich point to bring out (assuming that this is a nontrivial association). In addition, I am unsure about the need to study cliff-dwelling plants--perhaps you are writing for an audience that is completely committed to this as an important value. However, this reviewer would argue that it is incumbent upon you as authors to "sell" the importance of studying such plants to the broader plant science research community.  Other comments are included in the attached copy of your manuscript.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Sound--I only noted one tiny issue ("chlorophyl" rather than the correct spelling of "chlorophyll.").  Just needs a careful check to make sure that all is good throughout (in terms of English usage).

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

generally could be improved 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors of the manuscript propose as our main question the study of the patterns of potential responses in the contents of endogenous hormones in cliff species Opisthopappus taihangensis and Opisthopappus Longilobus under salt stress. The results of this research shed light on the possible adaptive mechanisms of O. taihangensis and O. longilobus under cliff environments, while laying the foundation for

the study of other cliff species in the Taihang Mountains.

 

Its objectives are clear, and they address questions of interest, such as (1) determining the expression trends of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to endogenous hormones under salt stress; (2) analyze the biosynthesis and signal transduction pathways of endogenous hormones under salt stress; (3) explore the similarities and differences of endogenous hormonal responses to salt stress between O. taihangensis and O. longilobus, so I consider the topic to be relevant, and it is a fairly complete work.

 

There is not much research related to these species, they are fundamentally directed at the study of molecular phylogeography, genetic diversity and micro satellites, which also makes it very original and relevant.

 

The methodology is complex and is very well described, there is an error in the NaCl concentration they use, it is not 500 mM/L, it is just 500 mM, I hope it is a typing error and not a conceptual error, also in the scientific names the species is always in lower case

 

The manuscript has no conclusions, at least not stated, but the discussion reports what the research reached and its importance.

 

The references are appropriate, 30% are from 2019 to date, which represents a low percentage, I think for the same reason that there is not much literature on the matter.

 

Regarding the figures and tables, we can comment that figures 3 and 4 have very small letters and that can be a problem when reading the article, the tables are relevant

I think it should be accepted after reviewing the comments.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

It is strongly recommended that the text be reviewed by an English speaker

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop