Next Article in Journal
Unraveling the Impact of Environmental Factors and Evolutionary History on Species Richness Patterns of the Genus Sorbus at Global Level
Previous Article in Journal
Circannual Clock in Laelia speciosa (Orchidaceae) Through Dormancy vs. Germination Dynamics of Seeds Stored Under Controlled Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chemical Screening and Nematicidal Activity of Essential Oils from Macaronesian and Mediterranean Plants for Controlling Plant-Parasitic Nematodes

by
Rui Ferreira
1,2,
Carla Maleita
3,4,
Luís Fonseca
4,
Ivânia Esteves
4,
Ivo Sousa-Ferreira
2,5,
Raimundo Cabrera
6 and
Paula Castilho
1,2,*
1
CQM—Madeira Chemistry Research Centre, University of Madeira, Campus da Penteada, 9020-105 Funchal, Portugal
2
Faculty of Exact Sciences and Engineering, University of Madeira, Campus da Penteada, 9020-105 Funchal, Portugal
3
CERES—Chemical Engineering and Renewable Resources for Sustainability, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Coimbra, Rua Sílvio Lima, 3030-790 Coimbra, Portugal
4
CFE-Centre for Functional Ecology—Science for People & the Planet, Associate Laboratory TERRA, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456 Coimbra, Portugal
5
CEAUL—Centre of Statistics and Its Applications, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
6
Phytopathology Unit, Biology Section, Faculty of Sciences, University of La Laguna, Avda. Astrofísico Francisco Sánchez s/n, 38204 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(3), 337; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030337
Submission received: 31 December 2024 / Revised: 12 January 2025 / Accepted: 20 January 2025 / Published: 23 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant-Parasitic Nematodes in Horticultural Plants)

Abstract

:
Plant-parasitic nematodes are highly damaging pests responsible for heavy losses in a considerable number of plant crops. Common pest management strategies rely on the use of synthetic chemical nematicides, which have led to serious concerns regarding their impact on human health and the environment. The essential oils (EOs) obtained from aromatic plant species can provide a good source of agents for the sustainable control of nematodes, due to higher biodegradability, generally low toxicity for mammals, fish, and birds, and lower bioaccumulation in the environment. This study aimed to evaluate the nematicidal and nematostatic properties of EOs extracted from plant species relevant to Macaronesia flora or with widespread use as culinary herbs in Mediterranean cuisine. Eighteen EOs were chemically characterized and evaluated by direct contact and hatching bioassays on the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica. The EOs that showed a significant effect on M. javanica second-stage juveniles’ (J2) mortality (≥40%) were also used in chemotaxis assays. From the eighteen EOs, seven showed strong nematicidal activity (>80%) and hatching inhibition. The chemotaxis assays revealed that only Mentha pulegium exhibited repellent behavior for M. javanica J2, and the rest of EOs had attractive behavior. Furthermore, EOs were assessed against the root-lesion nematode Pratylenchus penetrans and the pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Cinnamomum burmanni was the EO with the highest nematicidal activity for the three nematode species. Among the terpene-rich EOs, high mortality values and hatching inhibition for M. javanica were observed for the carvacrol chemotype Origanum vulgare, albeit with low activity for P. penetrans and B. xylophilus. Mentha pulegium, mainly composed of monoterpene ketones and monoterpenoids, demonstrated moderate-to-high mortality activity (from 30% for P. penetrans to 99% for M. javanica) for the three nematode species.

1. Introduction

Plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs) are among the most widespread and harmful global pests to economically important crops and forestry and are responsible for estimated yield losses of 12.3% [1,2]. There are over 4100 described species of PPNs belonging to various families. However, numerous authors consider that this number could be underestimated, since PPN interactions with their host and consequent symptoms are often non-specific and not understood by many farmers, making it difficult to attribute crop losses to PPN damage [3,4]. Plant-parasitic nematodes display a specialized structure in the anterior region, the stylet, essential to piercing the plant cell walls and penetrating the plant tissues for feeding and reproduction [5].
PPNs can be classified according to their feeding habitats as ectoparasitic, semi-endoparasites, and endoparasites nematodes. Ectoparasites (e.g., Belonolaimus spp., Dolichodorus spp., Longidorus spp., Xiphinema spp.) maintain a vermiform anatomy throughout their life cycle and are soil dwelling, often found in the rhizosphere using roots as a transient food source and often acting as plant virus vectors [4,5]. Endoparasites can be further classified as migratory and sedentary nematodes. Root-knot nematodes (RKNs, Meloidogyne spp.) are an economically important group of sedentary endoparasite nematodes. The infective stage (second-stage juvenile, J2) invades the root, migrates through tissues, and establishes a permanent feeding site in the vicinity of the vascular cylinder, causing direct damage to the host and yield losses in a wide range of food crops [4,5]. RKNs induce the formation of giant cells because of repeated nuclear divisions and cortical cells proliferation, resulting in the formation of a typical gall, which is observed as a primary symptom of infection [3]. Obligate biotrophs are entirely dependent on plant-derived nutrients to fulfill their energy requirements throughout their life cycle, with a broader host range for most Meloidogyne species [3,5]. Another important polyphagous group of PPNs, also with an impact on economically important crops, is the migratory endoparasite the root-lesion nematode (RLN), Pratylenchus spp. Root-lesion nematodes can enter and leave roots during their life cycle, causing lesions, necrotic areas, browning, and cell death in infected areas, often followed by root rotting by assorted attack by fungi and/or bacteria [4,6]. The pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, classified as a quarantine organism by the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO) is also a migratory endoparasite nematode responsible for the pine wilt disease, a serious threat to forest ecosystems and forestry industries at a global scale [7]. The presence of this nematode obliges restrictions on the movement of plants, woody materials, and forest products, alongside implementing control and management strategies in forested areas. The life cycle and parasitism mechanism of B. xylophilus is distinct from other PPNs. This nematode is vectored by Monochamus beetles during feeding or oviposition, and the life cycle occurs inside the host tree (mainly Pinus spp.), including both the fungal feeding and plant feeding developmental stages [6].
Several pest management strategies are currently used against PPNs; however, no single management strategy can be considered effective. Therefore, the use of nematicides needs to be combined with other approaches, such as crop rotation and newer cultivation methodologies, pre-planting soil disinfection, the breeding of resistance crop varieties, and in the case of B. xylophilus, the removal, burning, or chipping of infected trees and the installation of traps to capture its insect vector [2,7,8]. Nematicides, applied to agriculture and forestry, are aimed at limiting damage to plants by reducing the number of invading nematodes or limiting the transmission of nematodes to the host. For this, a range of nematicidal products, with different active substances, modes of action, and modes of application are commercially available. However, one major concern is the non-selectivity of most common nematicides, inducing toxicity to beneficial organisms, accumulation on soil, groundwater, and foodstuffs above the maximum residue levels imposed by individual countries and organizations [9,10]. With the increase in requirements for food safety and environmental protection, highly toxic nematicides are no longer suitable for modern agriculture. Ozone-depleting nematicides, such as methyl bromide, were phased out in 2005 under the United Nations’ Montreal Protocol in developed countries [11], which was subsequently followed by the removal of most other fumigants in the market. At the same time, the use of some organophosphate and carbamate nematicides have been restricted due to their environmental implications, which has led to a further reduction in available nematicides [9,10,12]. Therefore, there is increased interest in environmentally safer control methodologies derived from natural products. Essential oils (EOs), volatile natural complex secondary metabolites obtained by mechanical extraction or hydrodistillation from aromatic plant species, are at the forefront for studies as potential use as nematicides, as their biological activities against fungi and insects are well established [13,14]. Most of the biological activities of EOs are associated with an abundance of terpene hydrocarbons and oxygenated compounds, such as alcohols and phenolic terpenes, and their degradation into nontoxic products does not appear to have any harmful effects on nontarget organisms or accumulation in the soil or groundwater [6,15,16]. There are several studies on the potential use of EOs as nematicides for M. javanica, P. penetrans, and B. xylophilus [6,15,17], with some constituents characterized as phenylpropanoid revealing a strong nematicidal effect.
In our study, eighteen EOs from plant species, relevant to the Macaronesia flora of Madeira (Portugal) and Canary Islands (Spain), and the chemotypes of spices and aromatic plants were extracted by hydrodistillation with a Clevenger-type apparatus. Gas chromatography coupled with flame ionizing detector (GC-FID) quantification was used for the characterization of bioactive compounds. Nematicidal/nematostatic activity was assessed against the PPNs M. javanica, P. penetrans, and B. xylophilus, and the toxicity thresholds and lethal concentrations causing 50% mortality (LC50) were calculated for the most promising EOs. Hatching activity was also studied using M. javanica eggs. Finally, chemotaxis assays were implemented for the evaluation of attraction/repellent behavior of the targeted EOs and main components against M. javanica J2.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. EOS Phytochemical Profile

The chemical composition of each EO and the relative percentage of the major compounds are summarized in Table 1.
The quantified volatile components identified ranged from four compounds in Argyranthemum pinnatifidum to forty-four compounds in Mentha pulegium. In this study, EOs revealed a prevalence of monoterpenoids (27–92%) and monoterpenes (1–52%), except for the aromatic species Cinnamomum burmannii, Ocimum gratissimum, and Syzygium aromaticum, composed of phenylpropanoids (67–95%). Two of the three species of the genus Helichrysum (H. devium and H. melaleucum) were predominant in sesquiterpenes components.
α-phellandrene was the main terpene identified in Apollonias barbujana (ApSV), albeit in smaller quantities (16%) than the ones reported by Mohamed et al. [18]. Concerning Argyranthemum pinnatifidum (ApSV), monoterpene hydrocarbons were the most abundant, showing high proportions of β-myrcene (46%) (Table 1), also reported by Barroso et al. for this endemic species [19]; geraniol, an acyclic monoterpenoid, is also present in this EO (23%). For Artemisia argentea (AaPS), the monoterpene hydrocarbon α-phellandrene was the main compound (67%), followed by terpenoid camphor (12%). Figueiredo et al. reported a similar composition for this species in the only published study [20]. Cedronella canariensis (CcFN), a Macaronesia endemic species, had high relative amounts of pinocarvone (92%), an unusual bicyclic ketone, generally found in small amounts, with Engel et al. [21] describing a 50% pinocarvone abundance for samples collected in Tenerife and Madeira. The phenylpropanoid trans-cinnamaldehyde was the dominant EO of Cinnamomum burmannii (CbFX) with 91%, and no eugenol was present, as opposed to C. verum, regarded as “true cinnamon”, implying a positive identification as C. burmannii and confirming the conclusion of Wang et al. [22] and Yu et al. [23] for the common source of cinnamon in Europe and the United States.
EOs from Clinopodium ascendens had variations in terpene quantity for the two samples studied. The dominant compounds were (+)-pulegone and his isomer cis-isopulegone; however, the ratio of (+)-isopulegone/cis-pulegone content was more than double for the cultivated sample (CaCf), compared to the wild cultivar (CaFN). The relative proportion of secondary metabolites for this species is in agreement with the work of Castilho et al. [24], and variations could be attributed to the scheduled foliar fertilizing treatment and water availability for the cultivated sample. Hidalgo et al. described some differences in EO composition from samples from wild and cultivated sources, with isomenthone (37%), pulegone (17%), and 1,8-cineole (18%) as prevalent compounds [25], thus depicting the existence of different chemotypes, according to experimental data from Marongiu et al. [26]. Analyzing Table 1 and heatmap (Figure 1), the three Helichrysum species can be grouped into two clusters, according to their EO composition. For H. devium (HdSL) and H. melaleucum (HmAC), the bicyclic sesquiterpene (−) β-caryophyllene (15–45%) and alicyclic γ-curcumene (14–35%) were prevalent, with a reverse correlation of abundance for these metabolites between these species; for H. obconicum (HoSL), (+)-pulegone was more abundant (40%). Scarce information is available for these species, with most studies addressing the volatile composition for the species Helichrysum italicum [27,28]. Bornyl acetate represented 24% and α-terpinyl acetate about 16% for the Laurus novocanariensis EO (LnCc), followed by relative amounts of the hydrocarbon cyclic ether 1,8 cineole (5%), giving this sample a unique volatile profile among the studied species. These findings are notably different from that of the other species of Laurus (L. nobilis and L. azorica) described in the literature [29]. The EO of Mentha pulegium (MpFN) was rich in (+)-pulegone (54%), a monoterpene ketone, and the monocyclic monoterpenoid menthol (32%). Another study reported equivalent amounts of (+)-pulegone and (−) menthol in wild samples collected on the Chilean central coast, and the phytochemical variations are due to diverse climatic and geographical habitats [30]. For the EOs of Ocimum gratissimum and Syzygium aromaticum, the most abundant component was the phenylpropanoid eugenol (67–95%), with higher amounts in O. gratissimum, being grouped in the same cluster, according to Figure 1. The abundance of eugenol for both species is described in several studies [31,32,33].
A variation in the EO composition of the three samples of Origanum vulgare subsp. virens was observed. The main component of the EO obtained from a commercial source (OvPS) was the monoterpenoid thymol (59%), followed by the monoterpene biosynthetic precursor γ—terpinene (15%) and carvacrol (4%), the stereoisomer of thymol. For the sample deriving from the wild specimen (OvPEF), carvacrol was the most abundant component (73%) followed by γ—terpinene (6%) and thymol (6%). As for the sample obtained in Tenerife (OvLL), the relative proportion of the two isomers carvacrol and thymol was similar: 33% and 30%, respectively. Considering the hierarchical cluster heatmap (Figure 1), the thymol chemotype OvPS is more metabolically similar to Thymus vulgaris (TvLL). According to Lukas and Novak et al. [34,35], the occurrence and prevalence of secondary metabolites are consistent with the biosynthetic p—cymyl pathway proposed for the main compounds carvacrol/thymol, by which γ—terpinene is first converted to p—cymene and, in turn, further converted to carvacrol or thymol by two distinct hydrolases, thus establishing the main chemotypes for this species. Therefore, we can consider the presence of three chemotypes for O. vulgare based on the prevalence of secondary metabolites. Finally, for the EO of Thymus vulgaris, thymol was the prevalent compound, with a relative amount of 64%, which suggests that this EO belongs to a thymol chemotype and, thus, the results are similar to those from Borugă et al. [36] for samples cultivated in Romania. The chemical composition of the EO analyzed is, however, very different from that previously reported in Morocco and Spain for the same species of thyme [37].

2.2. Nematicidal Activity

2.2.1. Meloidogyne javanica—Mortality Bioassay

The M. javanica J2 mortality in 0.5% EtOH with 1% Tween 20 solution control (6.67 ± 1.75%) after 24 h of exposure was not significantly different from that observed in water control (3.94 ± 1.33%). EOs were not equally effective on M. javanica mortality after 24 h exposure at 2000 ppm (2.0 mg/ML), and no EO demonstrated nematostatic activity after replacing the EO with water (Figure 2). In some cases, the nematicidal activity increased, as observed for Clinopodium ascendens (CaCf), Helichrysum devium (HdSL), Mentha pulegium (MpFN), Origanum vulgare (OvLL), and Thymus vulgaris (TvLL), implying a lasting effect for these EOs. Among the studied EOs, Cinnamomum burmannii (CbFx), Cedronella canariensis (CcFN), Mentha pulegium (MpFN), Ocimum gratissimum (OgJA), and Syzygium aromaticum (SaFx) induced >90% mortality. Also, the carvacrol chemotype of Origanum vulgare subsp. virens OvPEF induced 86.04 ± 1.05% mortality, as opposed to 50.24 ± 5.09% for thymol-rich Origanum vulgare subsp. virens OvPS (Figure 2). The data are in agreement with the work of Oka et al. [17], who observed that EOs rich in carvacrol had a more effective nematicidal activity than those belonging to a thymol-rich chemotype. Another noteworthy result was the 23.61 ± 3.43% mortality observed after exposure to the sample acquired in “San Cristóbal de La Laguna” (OvLL) and characterized by a relative 1:1 proportion of thymol and carvacrol. These data may suggest an antagonistic behavior for the complex terpene mixture described for this sample. This hypothesis is supported by the mortality values for Thymus vulgaris EO (24.85 ± 0.75%), which is remarkably like the Origanum vulgare thymol: carvacrol chemotype (OvLL). The mortality rates for the two samples of Clinopodium ascendens EOs are different. Whereas the wild sample CaFN induced 2.59 ± 1.63% mortality, the cultivated sample CaCf caused 46.00 ± 2.43% of M. javanica J2 mortality. Again, the discrepancy can be attributed to the relative proportion of secondary metabolites, notably (+)-pulegone and cis-isopulegone, with a greater nematicidal impact for the latter (Table 1). This is somehow contradicted by the high activity of Mentha pulegium EOs, with a substantial amount of pulegone but no isopulegone; however, EOs from this species have more than 30% of menthol, which nematicidal activity is well-documented [38,39,40]. The number and position of double bonds appear to influence nematicidal activity [6].
A total of nine EOs with strong activity were further screened at lower EO concentrations (1000, 750, 500, 250, 100, 50, and/or 25 ppm obtained by serial dilutions) to determine toxicity thresholds and LC50 (Figure 3 and Table 2). A 100% mortality rate was observed 48 h after exposure to Cinnamomum burmannii EO for concentrations ≥ 100 ppm. As for other EOs with notable nematicidal effects, Syzygium aromaticum, Mentha pulegium, and Cedronella canariensis induced mortality rates ≥ 50% at 750 ppm; whereas, the EO from Ocimum gratissimum had a sharp decline in mortality from 64.60 ± 4.03% (1000 ppm) to 26.48 ± 2.51% (750 ppm). The samples of Origanum vulgare presented different outcomes in activity, with the carvacrol chemotype OvPEF inducing 65.14 ± 3.37% at 1000 ppm and decreasing to 10.30 ± 1.79% for 750 ppm (Figure 3). Nevertheless, this chemotype was the most effective in active Origanum vulgare EO.
As for LC50, estimated values at 24 h after exposure varied from 50.15 ppm for Cinnamomum burmannii to 1414.00 ppm for Origanum vulgare (OvPS), therefore giving the former EO more nematicidal potential (Table 2).

2.2.2. Meloidogyne javanica—Hatching Bioassay

The results obtained for the hatching bioassay follow a trend along the previous EOs screening for J2 mortality, since most EOs that produced significant mortality in the J2 were also effective at inhibiting hatching (Figure 4). Oka et al. [17] refer to the practicality of hatching bioassays in screening EOs for nematicidal activity, because counting hatched J2 is more accurate than counting immobile or deceased juveniles in a particular J2 population. The EOs from Clinopodium ascendens (CaFN) and Helichrysum obconicum (HoSL) produced an inhibitory hatching effect at the first 96 h, with egg hatching inhibition values of 37.88 ± 3% and 25.25 ± 5%, respectively. For the rest of the duration of the assay, there was a tendency to favor egg hatching, with both Eos’ observed values above the control solvent. The result was different from that observed with Origanum vulgare OvPS and Thymus vulgaris (TvLL), which have favored egg hatching for the first 48 h (19.40 ± 2% and 11.94 ± 3%, respectively) and produced an inhibitory effect for the rest of the duration of the assay (Figure 4).
Argyranthemum pinnatifidum (ApSV) and Artemisia aergentea (AaPS) EOs had similar values of hatching inhibition, starting from 12.00 ± 3% and 10.00 ± 2% at the first 48 h, peaking at 96 h with 21% inhibition for both, declining to values below 10% for the rest of the assay (Figure 4). This tendency was also observed for EOs from Cedronella canariensis (CcFN) and Clinopodium ascendens (CaCf), albeit with higher egg inhibition percentages for the last count at 216 h. This could be due to acquired resistance to EOs over time or a continuous volatilization process of terpenes present in the complex mixture of EOs. The values for the hatching inhibition observed for Cinnamomum burmanni EO (CbFx) are also relevant, with a verified egg inhibition percentage of 43.48 ± 2% after 216 h. Ntalli and Caboni [22] refer to high nematicidal activity against M. javanica for aldehydes, such as p-anisaldehyde, benzaldehyde, and trans-cinnamaldehyde. The EOs extracted from Helichrysum genus (HmAC and HoSL) and Laurus novocanariensis (LnCç) revealed a hatching inhibition percentage above the control solvent. Our data demonstrated an inhibition of hatching slightly above 2% for H. devium (HdSL). The EO extracted from Mentha pulegium (MpFN) was the most effective in hindering egg hatching, with inhibition values of 21.00 ± 4% for 48 h to 64.78 ± 4% after 216 h. This effect can be attributed to the abundance of pulegone and (−) menthol, as described by Abdelrasoul and El-Habashy [41] and Ntalli and Caboni [38,40,42]. Ocimum gratissimum (OgJA) displayed a hatching inhibition of 30.43 ± 3% at 48 h and 23.91 ± 3% at 216 h. These values are higher than that reported for the other eugenol-rich EO Syzygium aromaticum (SaFx) for the same timestamp and reflect the greater abundance of this phenylpropanoid in O. gratissimum.
As for the three chemotypes for Origanum vulgare subsp. virens (Ov), the observed inhibition percentage mimics the behavior observed for nematicidal activity, with the carvacrol chemotype (OvPEF) inhibiting 15.94 ± 3% of M. javanica hatching at 216 h, a higher value comparing the thymol chemotype (OvPS; 10.14 ± 2%) and carvacrol–thymol chemotype (OvLL; 9.42 ± 2%). These results are in agreement with the results previously stated in the literature [17] and also with the results obtained in our study for the nematicidal activity among each chemotype. The hatching inhibition induced by the EO from Thymus vulgaris (−11.94 ± 3% at 48 h, 9.42 ± 2% at 216 h) is very similar to values obtained for the thymol chemotype Origanum vulgare (OvPS), reflecting the abundance of thymol for the two EOs.

2.2.3. Meloidogyne javanica—Chemotaxis Bioassay

The M. javanica J2 chemotaxis assay results are presented in Figure 5. For the negative control Mili-Q water, both sides were selected in almost equal percentages (45.00 vs. 55.00%); however, a slight difference was observed for the control Tween 20, with M. javanica J2 preferring the treated area with the solvent of the EOs, compared to the Mili-Q water area (57.47 vs. 42.53%). For the tested EOs, only Mentha pulegium (MpFN) exhibited a repellent behavior for M. javanica J2, with a negative ratio between the attractive and repellent zones of −0.11, with nematodes preferring the untreated Mili-Q water area. Also, the thymol chemotype Origanum vulgare OvPS had an almost equal percentage between the EO and Mili-Q water control preferences (54.89 vs. 45.111%); although, the ratio of attractive–repellent zone was negative (–0.64). The rest of the EOs had attractive activities, being more evident for Ocimum gratissimum (OgJA; ratio of 0.85 and 92.33% of specimens in the treated area) and Thymus vulgaris (TvLL; ratio of 0.53 and 74.57% of specimens in the treated area). As for standards, all the tested terpenes and the phenylpropanoid eugenol revealed an attractive effect, favoring the treated area as opposed to the Mili-Q water area (Figure 5). An interesting observation refers to the effect of the monoterpenoid thymol (P THY). According to our study, M. javanica J2 favor the area treated with Mili-Q (52.16 vs. 47.84% for thymol area), which is opposite to the data for Thymus vulgaris EO (TvLL), where thymol is the prevalent compound, with 64%. The previously described effect for the thymol chemotype O. vulgare OvPS (59% abundance of thymol) aligns with the results for thymol. Thus, the results suggest antagonistic behavior for the complex terpene mixture identified for Thymus vulgaris, considering the presence and relative proportions of other terpenes, such as p—cymene and, especially, carvacrol, with attractive behavior in our study.

2.2.4. Pratylenchus penetrans—Mortality Bioassay

P. penetrans mortality with the EO solvent (0.5% EtOH with 1% Tween 20) was 16.61 ± 2.3% at the highest concentration of 2000 ppm, which is not significantly different from the mortality values observed in water (10.53 ± 1.5%). Of the seven EOs that showed nematicidal activity >70% at 2000 ppm for M. javanica, the EO from Cinnamomum burmanni (CbFx) presented a 100% mortality rate to concentrations ≥500 ppm, being the most effective EO (Figure 6). The abundance of trans-cinnamaldehyde, as the main compound in C. burmannii, may be responsible for this outcome. This observation is validated by Barbosa et al. [43], who state that compounds resulting from the phenylpropanoid pathway have a significant nematicidal activity to P. penetrans. Clinopodium ascendens (CaCf) and Mentha pulegium (MpFN) had a mortality rate >25% at 2000 ppm, even after replacing the EO with water and a second 24 h incubation period, thus reflecting the moderately induced mortality by (+) pulegone, isopulegone, and (−) menthol. However, the nematode mortality with C. ascendens EO decreased to 13.54 ± 0.82% at 1000 ppm, rendering this EO less effective, and a nematostatic effect was observed at a concentration of 500 ppm, since the mortality decreased after the removal of the EO. For the Cedronella canariensis EO (CcFN), the mortality at 2000 ppm was 22.95 ± 1.26% after the second 24 h incubation period, decreasing to 11.94 ± 1.47% at a concentration of 1000 ppm. The Ocimum gratissimum (OgJA—29.55 ± 0.98%) and Syzigium aromaticum (SaFx—25.33 ± 3.78%) EOs had similar mortality rates >25%, which can be attributed to considerable amounts of eugenol present, as shown in Table 1 (67–95%). Contrary to the observation from Barbosa et al. [43], the carvacrol-rich EO Origanum vulgare OvPEF only induced 16.75 ± 2.73% at 2000 ppm, as opposed to complete mortality described by that author.
Analyzing LC50 values, the Cinnamomum burmanni EO had the highest nematicidal effect on P. penetrans, with 99.38 ppm for the first 24 h incubation and 100.20 ppm after the EO removal and a further 24 h incubation in water. This LC50 was significantly higher than that calculated for this EO with M. javanica J2 (50.15 ppm for the first 24 h, 51.29 for the second 24 h). This tendency is further noticeable when comparing LC50 values for M. javanica J2 (Table 1) and P. penetrans mixed development stages (Table 3), which confirms a lower sensitivity for Pratylenchus to some nematicides compared to Meloidogyne, reported in the literature [44]. However, four EOs stood out for their high LC50 values, all with theoretical values surpassing 5000 ppm: Clinopodium ascendens (CaCf), Cedronella Canariensis (CcFN), Mentha pulegium (MpFN), and Ocimum Gratissimum (OgJA).

2.2.5. Bursaphelenchus xylophilus—Mortality Bioassay

As seen for the other two nematode species, the 24 h mortality rate for the EO solvent at the highest concentration of 2000 ppm (10.67 ± 1.26%) was not significantly different from that observed in water (8.37 ± 1.03%). EOs showing nematicidal activity ≥ 40% at 2000 ppm were screened at lower concentrations, as described (Figure 7).
As observed in the M. javanica and P. penetrans mortality bioassay, Cinnamomum burmannii (CbFx) induced 100% nematode mortality for concentrations ≥ 250 ppm (Figure 7). The other noteworthy EO, Mentha pulegium (MpFN), induced a mortality rate of 42.65 ± 3.74% at 2000 ppm after 24 h incubation and increased to 52.60 ± 4.23% after the removal of the EO solution and replacement with water. The Cedronella canariensis EO (CcFN) revealed a moderate nematicidal activity for PWN, with a mortality rate of 26.10 ± 2.56% at 2000 ppm for the first 24 h and 27.05 ± 2.93% at the second 24 h incubation period. This tendency was also observed in the P. penetrans mortality bioassay. The results suggest low activity of the main compound pinocarvone for PWN and RLN. It is noteworthy to compare the weaker nematicidal activity of Clinopodium ascendens (CaCf) in comparison with Mentha pulegium (MpFN). Both EOs have (+)-pulegone in significant concentrations (54% for M. pulegium, 32% for C. ascendens), but the presence of monoterpenoid (−) menthol (32%) in M. pulegium may produce a synergistic interaction between the two compounds that enhances the nematicidal activity [2,45]. Interestingly, the eugenol-rich Ocimum gratissimum (OgJA) and Syzygium aromaticum (SaFx) EOs that had induced > 90% mortality in M. javanica J2 (Figure 2) show the weakest activity for PWN within the tested EOs, with 9.47 ± 4.43% and 7.45 ± 0.63 mortality at 2000 ppm (2 mg/ML) in the first 24 h, respectively, in the same conditions. These results reflect the higher tolerance of B. xylophilus to phytochemicals and other nematicides, with one study referring to eugenol as one of the highest LC50 for this pathogen [6]. The data for the carvacrol chemotype Origanum vulgare (OvPEF) disclose a weak-to-moderate anti-PWN activity (15.49 ± 2.94% mortality rate for the first 24 h and 17.45 ± 3.19% for the second 24 h incubation period). These results are in sharp contrast to the ones observed for Mentha pulegium (MpFN), reaffirming the conclusion for substantial tolerance of B. xylophilus for the majority of the tested EOs. Various authors refer to the role of structural characteristics, such as the types of functional groups, saturation, and carbon skeleton in determining the toxicity of EOs and other plant metabolites for B. xylophilus [2,6,46]. Another study by Barbosa et al. [47] concerning the biological activity screening for fifty-two EOs against B. xylophilus revealed that thirteen EOs were highly effective, resulting in more than 90% mortality at 2000 ppm (2 mg/mL), with six of them resulting in 100% mortality. LC100 values ranged between 500 ppm (0.50 mg/mL) and 830 ppm (0.83 mg/mL) for the EOs of Origanum vulgare and Satureja montana, respectively. Faria et al. [2] evaluated the toxicity of eight EOs against B. xylophilus by comparing 1:1 EOs mixtures, to assess for potential synergistic interactions. The mixtures of Cymbopogon citratus–Mentha piperita EOs and of Foeniculum vulgareSatureja montana showed the highest activities among single EOs and mixtures, with LC50 of 0.09 and 0.05 µL/mL for the latter. Based on the second 24 h incubation in water, after a 24 h EO incubation, the Cinnamonum burmannii EO (CbFx) was the most toxic towards B. xylophilus with a LC50 value of 106.60 ppm, followed by Mentha pulegium (MpFN; 1959.10 ppm) (Table 4). The LC50 values of Clinopodium ascendens (CaCf) and Cedronella canariensis (CcFN) were in the same threshold, with theoretical values above 7000 ppm (Table 4).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals and Standards

Standards used for identification purposes with GC-FID were as follows: (−) pulegone (98%); (−)-isopulegone (99%); (+)-p-menth-1-ene (98%); (−)-citronellal (98%); ƴ- terpinene (99%); α-terpinene (95%); p-cymene (99%); (−)-α- pinene (98%); (−)-β-pinene (99%); R (+)-limonene (97%); and eugenol (99%) (Fluka™, Seelze, Germany). Thymol (99%); carvacrol (98%); and carvacrol methyl ether (98%) were acquired from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). n-hexane was acquired from PanReac AppliChem (Barcelona, Spain). For nematicidal/nematostatic activity, ethanol (96%) and sodium hypochlorite were acquired from Carlo Erba™ (Chau. du Vexin, France) and Tween 20 from PanReac AppliChem™ (Barcelona, Spain).

3.2. Sample Preparation

Fresh leaves or stems from different species important for the Macaronesia flora (Apollonias barbujana, Argyranthemum pinnatifidum, Artemisia argentea, Cedronella canariensis, Laurus novocanariensis, and three species of Helichrysum (H. devium, H. melaleucum, and H. obconicum)) or with widespread use as culinary herbs in Mediterranean cuisine (Cinnamomum burmannii, Mentha pulegium, Ocimum gratissimum, Origanum vulgare, Syzygium aromaticum, and Thymus vulgaris) were obtained (Table 1). Plant parts from O. vulgare subsp. virens were obtained from three diverse geographical sources: “Parque Ecológico do Funchal”, Madeira Island (wild specimen); “Ponta do Sol”, Madeira Island (cultivated); and “San Cristóbal de La Laguna”, Tenerife, Spain (cultivated) (Table 1). Also, two samples of Clinopodium ascendens were obtained from different Madeira origins: “Fajã da Nogueira” (wild specimen) and “Centro de Fruticultura” (cultivated by micropropagation from a wild specimen) (Table 1). Vouchers for endemic species were deposited in the Madeira Botanical Garden Eng. Rui Vieira. Leaves were dried for 48 h using a ventilated food dehydrator at 40 °C.

3.3. Essential Oil Isolation

The dried plant material was ground into a fine powder using a mechanical grinder to achieve particle sizes <250 µm. EOs were obtained by hydrodistillation for 4 h at a ratio of 1:20 (w/v) using a Clevenger-type apparatus. The EOs were stored in an opaque flask at 4 °C.

3.4. Gas Chromatography–Flame Ionization Detector (GC-FID) Conditions

The EOs were prepared by adding 1 mL of n-hexane to 20 mg of each EO and analyzed using a GC-FID method. The EOs characterization was performed using an Agilent 7890A gas chromatography (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with an autosampler Agilent 7693, a SPB™FA fused silica capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.2 µm), and an FID detector. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 800 µL/min. The GC oven temperature started at 60 °C for 2 min, increased to 220 °C at 2 °C/min, and held for 20 min, with a total runtime of 102 min. The injector and FID detector temperatures were held at 250 °C, respectively. One microliter of EO–hexane mixture was injected at a split ratio of 60:1, with a delay time of 4 min. Air and hydrogen were supplied to the FID detector at flow rates of 400 and 40 mL/min, respectively. The chromatographical analysis was performed using the proprietary software A.01.04. All assays were carried out in triplicate to guarantee statistical reliability. A cluster heatmap was generated by MetaboAnalyst 6.0 software (Alberta, CA, USA).
The validation method was assessed in terms of selectivity, linearity, and sensitivity. Linearity was determined by raging the individual concentration and by plotting the relative area versus the concentration. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were calculated by multiplying the standard deviation of the calibration curve’s intercept by 3 and 10, respectively, and dividing each by the slope of the corresponding linear regression equation.

3.5. Nematode Isolates

Three PPN species were obtained from the NEMATO-lab culture collection (CFE, UC, Portugal): M. javanica, P. penetrans, and B. xylophilus.
The RKN M. javanica isolate (PtJ) was originally obtained from the infected roots of potatoes (Guarda, Portugal) and kept on tomato cv. Coração-de-Boi pots, with sterilized sandy loam soil, sand, and substrate (1:1:1 v/v) [48]. Pots were kept in a growth chamber, at 25 ± 2 °C and 12:12 h light: dark. Concerning the mortality bioassay, egg masses were handpicked from the infected roots of tomatoes and placed in a hatching chamber. Hatched J2 from the first 24 h were discarded and subsequent J2, from the second 24 h, were collected and stored at 4 °C, until a maximum of 5 days. Before the assay, J2 were washed with sterile tap water using a 20 µm sieve, and a nematode suspension was obtained by rinsing the sieve with sterile tap water. For the hatching bioassay, egg masses were collected from infected roots, and eggs were extracted using a 0.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution under agitation for three minutes [49].
The RLN P. penetrans isolate (A44L4) was obtained from the infected roots of potatoes (Coimbra, Portugal) and was reared in vitro on carrot discs, following the protocol of Castillo et al. [1]. A nematode suspension consisting of mixed developmental stages was obtained from carrot discs by rinsing discs through a 20 µm sieve with sterile tap water.
The PWN B. xylophilus isolate (BxPT17AS) was collected from maritime pine, Pinus pinaster, at Alcácer do Sal, Portugal, and kept in cultures of Botrytis cinerea grown on malt extract agar medium at 25 °C. Mixed developmental nematode stages were collected from fungal cultures by washing the plate through a 20 µm sieve [50].

3.6. Nematicidal/Nematostatic Activity Bioassay

For each nematode species, direct-contact bioassays were performed in flat-bottom 96-well microtiter plates (Carl Roth GmbH & Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany). The EOs were solubilized in a solution of 0.5% EtOH with 1% Tween 20 under agitation to obtain a final concentration of 4000 ppm (4.0 mg/mL). A given volume of an aqueous suspension of nematodes, including 40–60 specimens, was added to each well, and the same volume of EO was added to obtain a final concentration of 2000 ppm (2.0 mg/mL). Water and the solution of 0.5% EtOH with 1% Tween 20 were included as controls, to assess natural nematode mortality and the effect of the organic solvent, respectively. Due to their inherent high toxicity, no nematicides were used as positive control, since the objective of this study was to evaluate the nematicidal/nematostatic potential of the EOs through a screening in vitro assay, as observed in other published studies employing this methodology [51,52,53,54]. Instead, positive controls were introduced in subsequent stages, such as pot or field trials, to assess the effectiveness of formulations or products when applied to soil environments.
The microtiter plates were sealed with plastic film to prevent EO volatilization and kept for 24 h under darkness at 25 ± 1 °C. To determine the nematicidal/nematostatic activity of each EO, after 24 h, live and immotile specimens were counted under a stereomicroscope. Then, the EO solution was removed and replaced by sterilized tap water to confirm, after another 24 h, the nematicidal or nematostatic activity of the EOs. Each treatment consisted of six replicates. EOs that showed an effect ≥ 70% on M. javanica mortality at 2000 ppm were screened at 1000 ppm (1.0 mg/mL) and for lower concentrations (750 (0.75 mg/mL), 500 (0.5 mg/mL), 250 (0.25 mg/mL), 100 (0.1 mg/mL), 50 (0.05 mg/mL), and 25 ppm (0.025 mg/mL)), obtained by serial dilutions, to determine toxicity thresholds, whenever an effect > 50% on mortality was observed.
Since P. penetrans and B. xylophilus are less sensitive to conventional fumigant nematicides compared to M. javanica, mostly due to their migratory endoparasitism and absence of permanent feeding sites [42,43,55], only the EOs that showed ≥70% effect on M. javanica mortality were further evaluated against P. penetrans and B. xylophilus.

3.7. Hatching Bioassay

The hatching bioassays were performed with M. javanica, in flat-bottom 96-well microtiter plates, following the same procedure described for mortality bioassay, with some adaptations. A total of 50 eggs, in approximately 50 µL of nematode suspension, were transferred into each well and the same volume of each 2000 ppm EO solution was added to obtain a final concentration of 1000 ppm. The plates were also sealed and maintained in the same conditions referred to above. Nematode hatching was checked at 2-day intervals for 9 days. Each treatment consisted of six replicates.

3.8. Chemotaxis Bioassay

In order to analyze whether the targeted EOs attract, repel, or have no effect on M. javanica J2 behavior, a combined and modified version of the methodology described by Hewlett et al. [56], Zhai et al. [57], and Petrikovszki et al. [58] was applied. Chemotaxis was studied on 1% water agar in 5.5 cm diameter Petri dish (7 mL/Petri dish). Circular wells (0.5 cm Ø) were performed on opposite sides of each Petri dish, and 50 µL of EO or Mili-Q water was pipetted into the wells. Approximately, 20 J2 (±10 µL) were placed at the center of each plate, and the plates maintained in the dark at 24 °C. After 24 h, the number of J2 in the attractive and repellent zones was recorded, according to Petrikovszki et al. [58]. Treatments were replicated 4/5 times, and the experiment was repeated twice. The results were presented as a percentage of the ratio between attractive and repellent zones. Only the EOs that showed a significant effect on M. javanica J2 mortality (approximately ≥ 40%) were used in the chemotaxis assay at the lower concentration with the highest effect. The main component of each EO was also tested at the same concentration of the EO: carvacrol, (−)-citronellal, eugenol, (−)-isopulegol, (−) pulegone, and thymol.

3.9. Statistical Analysis

All assays were carried out in triplicates to guarantee statistical significance. The data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc multiple comparison test using IBM SPSS Statistic 29.0.1.0 software (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). Data on mortality were converted to percentage cumulative mortality and corrected by the Schneider–Orelli formula [59], concerning experimental solvent control.
%   c u m u l a t i v e   m o r t a l i t y = %   m o r t a l i t y E O   t r e a t m e n t %   m o r t a l i t y c o n t r o l 100 %   m o r t a l i t y   c o n t r o l   × 100
The mortality data were logarithmically transformed, and the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variances were assessed with the Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s tests, respectively, before conducting ANOVA. Results were considered statistically significant at 95% confidence level (p < 0.05). Data on mortality and hatching, derived from 24 and 48 h observations for mortality and 9 days for hatching, were also subjected to Probit analysis [60] using GraphPad Prism 10 software (GraphPad Software, Boston, MA, USA), and the lethal concentrations causing 50% mortality (LC50) calculated.
The percentage inhibition of hatching for each EO concentration was calculated using the modified formula with reference to experimental solvent control [61,62].
%   H a t c h i n g   i n h i b i t i o n = H a t c h e d   J 2   i n   c o n t r o l H a t c h e d   J 2   i n   t r e a t m e n t   H a t c h e d   J 2   i n   c o n t r o l × 100

4. Conclusions

The present work evaluated the nematotoxicity of 18 EOs, extracted from distinct species relevant to the Macaronesian flora or commonly used as culinary herbs in Mediterranean cuisine. The selected EOs showed antifungal and insect antifeeding activities in previous studies (Rui Ferreira, unpublished result). To our knowledge, nine plant species (Apollonias barbusana, Argyranthemum pinnatifidum, Artemisia argentea, Cedronella canariensis, Clinopodium ascendens, Helichrysum devium, H. melaleucum, H. obconicum, and Laurus novocanariensis) were evaluated for the first time for their nematicidal potency against PPNs. Seven EOs caused an effect on M. javanica J2 mortality (>80%) and hatching at 2000 ppm, being further tested at lower concentrations and evaluated for attraction/repellent behavior with a methodology of area choice. Nematicidal activity from these seven EOs were further assessed in P. penetrans and B. xylophilus.
The EO of Cinnamomum burmanni, with trans-cinnamaldehyde as a major constituent, displayed high mortality values and lower LC50 values for the three studied PPN species, attaining full mortality at concentrations > 100 ppm in the case of M. javanica, 500 ppm for P. penetrans, and 250 ppm for B. xylophilus. These data corroborate the findings described in previous studies about the potential use of EOs from Cinnamomum plants, as broad-spectrum nematicides [39,46]. However, in the chemotaxis assay, this EO revealed an attractive behavior, with nematodes favoring the treated area, suggesting an attractive behavior at higher concentrations.
EOs rich in eugenol, such as those from Ocimum gratissimum and Syzygium aromaticum, induced > 90% mortality in M. javanica but low activity for P. penetrans and B. xylophilus, with mortality rates < 30%, while also showing an attractive response. This highlights a substantial tolerance of B. xylophilus to phenylpropanoid eugenol, as suggested by Sarri et al. [39].
Among the terpene-rich EOs, high mortality values and hatching inhibition for M. javanica were observed with phenol monoterpenes, particularly carvacrol but only moderately for the isomer thymol. This observation is validated by the distinct effect for the three chemotypes of Origanum vulgare (OvPEF, OvPS and OvLL). The carvacrol chemotype (OvPEF) was more effective than the thymol (OvPS) or carvacrol: thymol (OvLL) chemotypes, indicating that quantitative variations in EO monoterpene composition and isomerism appear to influence activity against RKNs, as theorized by Oka et al. [17]. However, the carvacrol chemotype demonstrated lower mortality against P. penetrans and B. xylophilus.
The EO from Mentha pulegium (MpFN), containing primarily (+)-pulegone and (−) menthol, display strong nematicidal activity against M. javanica but moderate effects against P. penetrans and B. xylophilus. As for attractive/repellent behavior, Mentha pulegium EO was classified as repellent for M. javanica J2.
The lowest M. javanica mortality activity was observed with EOs composed of mono-, sesquiterpenes and acetate ester monoterpenoid fractions, such as (−) β caryophyllene, γ-curcumene, bornyl acetate, and α-phellandrene, which were present in the EOs of Helichrysum species, Laurus novocanariensis, and Artemisa aergentea.
In conclusion, the essential oils (EOs) assessed in this study demonstrate varying levels of nematotoxic activity, with Cinnamomum burmanni and Mentha pulegium showing notable promise for inclusion in sustainable pest management strategies. To successfully integrate these EOs into pest control systems, further research is required to elucidate the mechanisms of action of their primary constituents. Additionally, research on potential synergistic or antagonistic interactions, alongside assessments of the impact on nontarget organisms are essential for optimizing their efficacy. Future studies should also prioritize the development of “user-friendly” formulations, addressing aspects such as controlled release, environmental degradation, and cost-effectiveness.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.F. and P.C.; methodology, R.F., C.M., L.F. and I.E.; investigation, R.F., C.M., L.F. and I.E.; writing—original draft preparation, R.F.; writing—review and editing, P.C., C.M., L.F., I.E., R.C. and I.S.-F.; formal analysis, R.F. and I.S.-F.; funding acquisition, P.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

CQM authors acknowledge funding from the FCT-Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Base Fund UIDB/00674/2020 and Programmatic Fund UIDP/00674/2020, Portuguese Government Funds), Secretaria Regional de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia, through ARDITI-Agência Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Investigação Tecnologia e Inovação (M1420-01-0145-FEDER-000005—Centro de Química da Madeira-CQM+), and by the project MACBIOPEST (MAC2/1.1a/289), under program Interreg co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER), MAC 2014-2020 Program. Rui Ferreira acknowledges the support of FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia) with a PhD grant with the reference 2020. 07711.BD. In UC, this research was supported by CERES and CFE and FEDER funds through the Portugal 2020 (PT2020) “Programa Operacional Fatores de Competitividade 2020” (COMPETE 2020) and by FCT-Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, under contracts CFE UIDB/04004/2020 (DOI: 10.54499/UIDB/04004/2020) and UIDP/04004/2020 (DOI: 10.54499/UIDP/04004/2020); CEECIND/02082/2017/CP1460/CT0004 (DOI: 10.54499/CEECIND/02082/2017/CP1460/CT0004); and CERES UIDB/00102/2020 (DOI: 10.54499/UIDB/00102/2020) and UIDP/00102/2020 (DOI: 10.54499/UIDP/00102/2020).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Poveda, J.; Abril-Urias, P.; Escobar, C. Biological Control of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes by Filamentous Fungi Inducers of Resistance: Trichoderma, Mycorrhizal and Endophytic Fungi. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Faria, J.M.S.; Cavaco, T.; Gonçalves, D.; Barbosa, P.; Teixeira, D.M.; Moiteiro, C.; Inácio, M.L. First Report on the Synergistic Interaction between Essential Oils against the Pinewood Nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Plants 2023, 12, 2438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Siddique, S.; Grundler, F.M. Parasitic nematodes manipulate plant development to establish feeding sites. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2018, 46, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jones, J.T.; Haegeman, A.; Danchin, E.G.J.; Gaur, H.S.; Helder, J.; Jones, M.G.K.; Kikuchi, T.; Manzanilla-López, R.; Palomares-Rius, J.E.; Wesemael, W.M.L.; et al. Top 10 plant-parasitic nematodes in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2013, 14, 946–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, W.; Park, S.W. Underground mystery: Interactions between plant roots and parasitic nematodes. Curr. Plant Biol. 2018, 15, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Faria, J.M.S.; Barbosa, P.; Vieira, P.; Vicente, C.S.L.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Mota, M. Phytochemicals as biopesticides against the pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus: A review on essential oils and their volatiles. Plants 2021, 10, 2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. EPPO. EPPO Datasheet: Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. EPPO Glob Database [Internet]. 2020. Available online: https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/BURSXY/datasheet (accessed on 6 January 2024).
  8. Haydock, P.P.J.; Woods, S.R.; Grove, I.G.; Hare, M.C. Chemical control of nematodes. In Plant Nematology; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2006; pp. 392–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, J.; Li, Q.X.; Song, B. Chemical Nematicides: Recent Research Progress and Outlook. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 12175–12188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Desaeger, J.; Wram, C.; Zasada, I. New reduced-risk agricultural nematicides-rationale and review. J. Nematol. 2021, 52, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. United Nations Environment Programme. Handbook for the Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer; The Montreal Protocol; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2020; 960p. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, Y.; Luo, X.; Chen, Y.; Peng, J.; Yi, C.; Chen, J. Recent research progress of heterocyclic nematicidal active compounds. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2023, 60, 1287–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tripathi, A.K.; Upadhyay, S.; Bhuiyan, M.; Bhattacharya, P.R. A review on prospects of essential oils as biopesticide in insect-pest management. J. Pharmacogn. Phyther. 2009, 1, 052–063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Walia, S.; Saha, S.; Tripathi, V.; Sharma, K.K. Phytochemical biopesticides: Some recent developments. Phytochem. Rev. 2017, 16, 989–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Catani, L.; Manachini, B.; Grassi, E.; Guidi, L.; Semprucci, F. Essential Oils as Nematicides in Plant Protection—A Review. Plants 2023, 12, 1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lounés-Hadj, A.; Raveau, R.; Fontaine, J. Essential Oils as Potential Alternative Biocontrol Products against Plant Pathogens and Weeds: A Review. Foods 2020, 9, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Oka, Y.; Nacar, S.; Putievsky, E.; Ravid, U.; Yaniv, Z.; Spiegel, Y. Nematicidal Activity of Essential Oils and Their Components Against the Root-Knot Nematode. Phytopathology 2000, 90, 710–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mohamed, A.-S.; Ahmed, W.; Elshatoury, E.; Mourad, M. Leaf Anatomy, Chemical Composition as Well as Essential Oils and their Antibacterial Activity of Some Lauraceous Taxa. Taeckholmia 2016, 36, 77–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Barroso, J.G.; Pedro, L.G.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Fontinha, S.S.; Looman, A.; Scheffer, J.J.C. The Essential Oils of Two Endemic Argyranthemum Species of the Madeira Archipelago: A. pinnatifidum (L. fil.) Lowe spp. pinnatifidum and A. haemotomma (Lowe) Lowe. Flavour Fragr. J. 1996, 11, 211–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Figueiredo, A.C.; Barroso, J.G.; Pedro, L.G.; Fontinha, S.S.; Looman, A.; Scheffer, J.J.C. Composition of the essential oil of artemisia argentea l′hér., an endemic species of the madeira archipelago. Flavour Fragr. J. 1994, 9, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Engel, R.; Nahrstedt, A.; Hammerschmidt, F.J. Composition of the essential oils of Cedronella canariensis (L.) Webb et Berth, ssp. canariensis and ssp. anisata f. glabra and f. pubescens. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1995, 7, 473–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, Y.H.; Avula, B.; Nanayakkara, N.P.D.; Zhao, J.; Khan, I.A. Cassia cinnamon as a source of coumarin in cinnamon-flavored food and food supplements in the United States. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 4470–4476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yu, T.; Yao, H.; Qi, S.; Wang, J. GC-MS analysis of volatiles in cinnamon essential oil extracted by different methods. Grasas Aceites 2020, 71, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Castilho, P.; Liu, K.; Rodrigues, A.; Feio, S.; Tomi, F.; Casanova, J. Composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Clinopodium ascendens (Jordan) Sampaio from Madeira. Flavour Fragr. J. 2007, 22, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hidalgo, P.J.; Libera, J.L.; Santos, J.A.; LaFont, F.; Castellanos, C.; Palomino, A.; Román, M. Essential oils in Calamintha sylvatica bromf. ssp. ascendens (jordan) p.w. ball: Wild and cultivated productions and antifungal activity. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2002, 14, 68–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Marongiu, B.; Piras, A.; Porcedda, S.; Falconieri, D.; Maxia, A.; Gonçalves, M.J.; Salgueiro, L.; Piras, A.; Porcedda, S.; Falconieri, D.; et al. Chemical composition and biological assays of essential oils of Calamintha nepeta (L.) Savi subsp. nepeta (Lamiaceae). Nat. Prod. Res. 2010, 24, 1734–17642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Maksimovic, S.; Tadic, V.; Skala, D.; Zizovic, I. Separation of phytochemicals from Helichrysum italicum: An analysis of different isolation techniques and biological activity of prepared extracts. Phytochemistry 2017, 138, 9–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rossi, P.G.; Berti, L.; Panighi, J.; Luciani, A.; Maury, J.; Muselli, A.; Serra, D.D.R.; Gonny, M.; Bolla, J.M. Antibacterial action of essential oils from corsica. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2007, 19, 176–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rodilla, J.M.; Tinoco, M.T.; Morais, J.C.; Gimenez, C.; Cabrera, R.; Martín-Benito, D.; Castillo, L.; Gonzalez-Coloma, A. Laurus novocanariensis essential oil: Seasonal variation and valorization. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2008, 36, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Montenegro, I.; Said, B.; Godoy, P.; Besoain, X.; Parra, C.; Díaz, K.; Madrid, A. Antifungal activity of essential oil and main components from Mentha pulegium growing wild on the chilean central coast. Agronomy 2020, 10, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cortés-Rojas, D.F.; de Souza, C.R.F.; Oliveira, W.P. Clove (Syzygium aromaticum): A precious spice. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2014, 4, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jirovetz, L.; Buchbauer, G.; Stoilova, I.; Stoyanova, A.; Krastanov, A.; Schimidt, E. Chemical composition and antioxidant properties of dill essential oil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 6303–6307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Oliveira, L.M.; de Almeida Chaves, D.S.; Raquel de Jesus, I.L.; Miranda, F.R.; Ferreira, T.P.; Nunes e Silva, C.; de Souza Alves, N.; Alves, M.C.C.; Avelar, B.R.; Scott, F.B.; et al. Ocimum gratissimum essential oil and eugenol against Ctenocephalides felis felis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: In vitro activity and residual efficacy of a eugenol-based spray formulation. Vet. Parasitol. 2022, 309, 109771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lukas, B.; Schmiderer, C.; Novak, J. Essential oil diversity of European Origanum vulgare L. (Lamiaceae). Phytochemistry 2015, 119, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Novak, J.; Lukas, B.; Franz, B. Temperature influences thymol and carvacrol differentially in Origanum spp. (Lamiaceae). J. Essent. Oil Res. 2010, 22, 412–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Borugă, O.; Jianu, C.; Mişcă, C.; Goleţ, I.; Gruia, A.T.; Horhat, F.G. Thymus vulgaris essential oil: Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity. J. Med. Life 2014, 7, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Ballester-Costa, C.; Sendra, E.; Fernández-López, J.; Pérez-Álvarez, J.A.; Viuda-Martos, M. Chemical composition and in vitro antibacterial properties of essential oils of four Thymus species from organic growth. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 50, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Caboni, P.; Saba, M.; Tocco, G.; Casu, L.; Murgia, A.; Maxia, A.; Menkissoglu-Spiroudi, U.; Ntalli, N.; Weldegergish, T. Nematicidal Activity of Mint Aqueous Extracts against the Root-Knot Nematode Meloidogyne incognita. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 9784–9788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sarri, K.; Mourouzidou, S.; Ntalli, N.; Monokrousos, N. Recent Advances and Developments in the Nematicidal Activity of Essential Oils and Their Components against Root-Knot Nematodes. Agronomy 2024, 14, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ntalli, N.G.; Ferrari, F.; Giannakou, I.; Menkissoglu-Spiroudi, U. Phytochemistry and nematicidal activity of the essential oils from 8 greek lamiaceae aromatic plants and 13 terpene components. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 7856–7863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Abdel Rasoul, M.; El-Habashy, D. Nematicidal Activity of some Nanoemulsions of Monoterpenes on Tomato Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne javanica). J. Plant Prot. Pathol. 2021, 12, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ntalli, N.G.; Caboni, P. Botanical nematicides: A review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 9929–9940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Barbosa, P.; Faria, J.M.S.; Cavaco, T.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Mota, M.; Vicente, C.S.L. Nematicidal Activity of Phytochemicals against the Root-Lesion Nematode Pratylenchus penetrans. Plants 2024, 13, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wram, C.L.; Zasada, I. Differential response of meloidogyne, pratylenchus, globodera, and xiphinema species to the nematicide fluazaindolizine. Phytopathology 2020, 110, 2003–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Choi, I.H.; Kim, J.; Shin, S.C.; Park, I.K. Nematicidal activity of monoterpenoids against the pine wood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus). Russ. J. Nematodol. 2007, 15, 35–40. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kong, J.O.; Lee, S.M.; Moon, Y.S.; Lee, S.G.; Ahn, Y.J. Nematicidal activity of cassia and cinnamon oil compounds and related compounds toward Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: Parasitaphelenchidae). J. Nematol. 2007, 39, 31–36. [Google Scholar]
  47. Barbosa, P.; Faria, J.M.S.; Mendes, M.D.; Dias, L.S.; Tinoco, M.T.; Barroso, J.G.; Pedro, L.G.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Mota, M. Bioassays against pinewood nematode: Assessment of a suitable dilution agent and screening for bioactive essential oils. Molecules 2012, 17, 12312–12329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Maleita, C.M.; Simões, M.J.; Egas, C.; Curtis, R.H.C.C.; de O Abrantes, I.M. Biometrical, biochemical, and molecular diagnosis of Portuguese Meloidogyne hispanica isolates. Plant Dis. 2012, 96, 865–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Van Bezooijen, J. Methods and Techniques for Nematology. 2006, 1–118. Available online: https://nematologia.com.br/files/uploads/2014/03/vanBezo.pdf (accessed on 28 February 2024).
  50. Fonseca, L.; Vieira dos Santos, M.C.; de A. Santos, M.S.N.; Curtis, R.H.C.; de O. Abrantes, I.M. Morpho-biometrical characterization of Portuguese Bursaphelenchus xylophilus isolates with mucronate, digitale or round tailed females. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2008, 47, 223–233. [Google Scholar]
  51. Faria, J.M.S.; Barbosa, P.; Bennett, R.N.; Mota, M.; Figueiredo, A.C. Bioactivity against Bursaphelenchus xylophilus: Nematotoxics from essential oils, essential oils fractions and decoction waters. Phytochemistry 2013, 94, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kundu, A.; Dutta, A.; Mandal, A.; Negi, L.; Malik, M.; Puramchatwad, R.; Antil, J.; Singh, A.; Rao, U.; Saha, S.; et al. A Comprehensive in vitro and in silico Analysis of Nematicidal Action of Essential Oils. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 614143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kaur, T.; Jasrotia, S.; Ohri, P.; Manhas, R.K. Evaluation of in vitro and in vivo nematicidal potential of a multifunctional streptomycete, Streptomyces hydrogenans strain DH16 against Meloidogyne incognita. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 192, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Gouveia, M.; Cordeiro, N.; Teixeira, L.; Abrantes, I.D.O.; Pestana, M.; Rodrigues, M. In vitro evaluation of nematicidal properties of Solanum sisymbriifolium and S. nigrum extracts on Pratylenchus goodeyi. Nematology 2014, 16, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jones, M.G.K.; Fosu-Nyarko, J. Molecular biology of root lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus spp.) and their interaction with host plants. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2014, 164, 163–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hewlett, T.E.; Hewlett, E.M.; Dickson, D.W. Response of Meloidogyne spp., Heterodera glycines, and Radopholus similis to tannic acid. J. Nematol. 1997; 29, (Suppl. 4), 737–741. [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhai, Y.; Shao, Z.; Cai, M.; Zheng, L.; Li, G.; Huang, D.; Cheng, W.; Thomashow, L.S.; Weller, D.M.; Yu, Z.; et al. Multiple modes of nematode control by volatiles of Pseudomonas putida 1A00316 from Antarctic soil against Meloidogyne incognita. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Petrikovszki, R.; Toth, F.; Nagy, P.I. Aqueous Extracts of Organic Mulch Materials Have Nematicide and Repellent Effect on Meloidogyne incognita Infective Juveniles: A Laboratory Study. J. Nematol. 2023, 55, 20230037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Puntener, W.; Zahner, O. Manual for Field Trials in Plant Protection, 2nd ed.; Ciba-Geigy: Basle, Switzerland, 1981; 205p. [Google Scholar]
  60. Finney, D.J. Probit Analysis, 3rd ed.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1971; 333p. [Google Scholar]
  61. Das, S.; Wadud, A.; Khokon, M.A.R. Evaluation of the effect of different concentrations of organic amendments and botanical extracts on the mortality and hatching of Meloidogyne javanica. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 3759–3767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mahesha, H.S.; Ravichandra, N.G.; Rao, M.S.; Narasegowda, N.C.; Sonyal, S.; Hotkar, S. Bio-efficacy of Different Strains of Bacillus spp. against Meloidogyne incognita under in vitro. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2017, 6, 2511–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Hierarchical clustering heatmap of the essential oils profile.
Figure 1. Hierarchical clustering heatmap of the essential oils profile.
Plants 14 00337 g001
Figure 2. Corrected cumulative mortality (%) of Meloidogyne javanica second-stage juveniles, 24 h after exposure to 2000 ppm of each eighteen essential oils (grey) and 24 h after replacing the essential oils with water (blank). Water and a 0.5% EtOH with 1% Tween 20 solution were used as controls. Data are presented as an average of six triplicates, and error bars indicate the standard deviation. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were determined using a paired t-test (*) significant difference. For essential oil codes, see Table 1.
Figure 2. Corrected cumulative mortality (%) of Meloidogyne javanica second-stage juveniles, 24 h after exposure to 2000 ppm of each eighteen essential oils (grey) and 24 h after replacing the essential oils with water (blank). Water and a 0.5% EtOH with 1% Tween 20 solution were used as controls. Data are presented as an average of six triplicates, and error bars indicate the standard deviation. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were determined using a paired t-test (*) significant difference. For essential oil codes, see Table 1.
Plants 14 00337 g002
Figure 3. Corrected cumulative mortality (%) of Meloidogyne javanica second-stage juveniles, 24 h after exposure to different concentrations of the most effective essential oils (1st 24 h) and 24 h after replacing the essential oils with water (2nd 24 h). Water and a 0.5% EtOH with 1% Tween 20 solution were used as controls. Data are presented as an average of six replicates, and error bars indicate the standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s honestly significance difference (HSD) post hoc test; different letters (a, b, c, …) and (a’, b’, c’, …) represent significant differences at p < 0.05 for the 1st and 2nd 24 h, respectively.
Figure 3. Corrected cumulative mortality (%) of Meloidogyne javanica second-stage juveniles, 24 h after exposure to different concentrations of the most effective essential oils (1st 24 h) and 24 h after replacing the essential oils with water (2nd 24 h). Water and a 0.5% EtOH with 1% Tween 20 solution were used as controls. Data are presented as an average of six replicates, and error bars indicate the standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s honestly significance difference (HSD) post hoc test; different letters (a, b, c, …) and (a’, b’, c’, …) represent significant differences at p < 0.05 for the 1st and 2nd 24 h, respectively.
Plants 14 00337 g003aPlants 14 00337 g003b
Figure 4. Hatching bioassay for Meloidogyne javanica for 216 h and exposure to 1000 ppm for each essential oil. Data are presented as an average of six replicates, and error bars indicate the standard deviation. For each EO, statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc test. Ctr: EtOH 0.5% + Tween 20 1%; different letters represent significant differences at p < 0.05 at different times. For essential oil codes, see Table 1.
Figure 4. Hatching bioassay for Meloidogyne javanica for 216 h and exposure to 1000 ppm for each essential oil. Data are presented as an average of six replicates, and error bars indicate the standard deviation. For each EO, statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc test. Ctr: EtOH 0.5% + Tween 20 1%; different letters represent significant differences at p < 0.05 at different times. For essential oil codes, see Table 1.
Plants 14 00337 g004
Figure 5. Chemotaxis bioassay for Meloidogyne javanica J2 with various essential oils and standards. Water and 0.5% EtOH with 1% Tween 20 solutions were included as controls. Data are presented as the average of four/five replicates, and error bars indicate the standard deviation. For essential oil codes, see Table 1. P THY: thymol CAS 89-83-8; P PUL: S (−) pulegone CAS 3391-90-0; P ISP: (−) isopulegol CAS 89-79-2; P EUG: eugenol CAS 97-53-0: P CRV: carvacrol CAS 499-75-2.
Figure 5. Chemotaxis bioassay for Meloidogyne javanica J2 with various essential oils and standards. Water and 0.5% EtOH with 1% Tween 20 solutions were included as controls. Data are presented as the average of four/five replicates, and error bars indicate the standard deviation. For essential oil codes, see Table 1. P THY: thymol CAS 89-83-8; P PUL: S (−) pulegone CAS 3391-90-0; P ISP: (−) isopulegol CAS 89-79-2; P EUG: eugenol CAS 97-53-0: P CRV: carvacrol CAS 499-75-2.
Plants 14 00337 g005
Figure 6. Corrected cumulative mortality (%) of Pratylenchus penetrans mixed developmental stages, 24 h after exposure to different concentrations of the most effective essential oils (1st 24h) and 24 h after replacing the essential oils with water (2nd 24 h). Water and a 0.5% EtOH with 1% Tween 20 solution were used as controls. Data are presented as an average of six replicates, and error bars indicate the standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc test; different letters (a, b, c, …) and (a’, b’, c’, …) represent significant differences at p < 0.05 for the 1st and 2nd 24 h, respectively.
Figure 6. Corrected cumulative mortality (%) of Pratylenchus penetrans mixed developmental stages, 24 h after exposure to different concentrations of the most effective essential oils (1st 24h) and 24 h after replacing the essential oils with water (2nd 24 h). Water and a 0.5% EtOH with 1% Tween 20 solution were used as controls. Data are presented as an average of six replicates, and error bars indicate the standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc test; different letters (a, b, c, …) and (a’, b’, c’, …) represent significant differences at p < 0.05 for the 1st and 2nd 24 h, respectively.
Plants 14 00337 g006
Figure 7. Corrected cumulative mortality (%) of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus mixed developmental stages, 24 h after exposure to different concentrations of the most effective essential oils (−) and 24 h after replacing the essential oils with water. Water and a 0.5% EtOH with 1% Tween 20 solution were used as controls. Data are presented as the average of six replicates, and error bars indicate the standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc test; different letters (a, b, c, …) and (a’, b’, c’, …) represent significant differences at p < 0.05 for the 1st and 2nd 24 h, respectively.
Figure 7. Corrected cumulative mortality (%) of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus mixed developmental stages, 24 h after exposure to different concentrations of the most effective essential oils (−) and 24 h after replacing the essential oils with water. Water and a 0.5% EtOH with 1% Tween 20 solution were used as controls. Data are presented as the average of six replicates, and error bars indicate the standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc test; different letters (a, b, c, …) and (a’, b’, c’, …) represent significant differences at p < 0.05 for the 1st and 2nd 24 h, respectively.
Plants 14 00337 g007
Table 1. Essential oils included in this study: code, origin, ID voucher, extraction yield, and profile characterization by gas chromatography with flame ionizing detector.
Table 1. Essential oils included in this study: code, origin, ID voucher, extraction yield, and profile characterization by gas chromatography with flame ionizing detector.
Plant SpeciesCodeOriginID VoucherYield (v/w, %)Major Compounds 1
Apollonias barbujanaAbSVSão Vicente—MadeiraMADJ1043210.05α-phellandrene (16.01 ± 0.13); (−) β-caryophyllene (6.09 ± 0.08)
Argyrantherum pinnatifidumApSVSão Vicente—MadeiraMADJ145430.11β -myrcene (45.91 ± 0.28); geraniol (23.33 ± 0.04)
Artemisia argenteaAaPSPorto Santo—MadeiraMADJ152310.19α-phellandrene (66.83 ± 0.162); camphor (12.44 ± 0.08); (−) β-caryophyllene (6.34 ± 0.09)
Cedronella canariensisCcFNFajã da Nogueira—MadeiraMADJ243561.10pinocarvone (92.40 ± 1.67); (−) β-caryophyllene (2.27 ± 0.59)
Cinnamomum burmanniiCbFxMarket Funchal—Madeiran.a.10.62trans cinnamaldehyde (90.46 ± 3.97)
Clinopodium ascendensCaCfCentro de Fruticultura—Madeiran.a.21.37cis—isopulegone (70.17 ± 1.93); (+)-pulegone (21.26 ± 0.40); isopulegol (1.50 ± 0.44)
CaFNFajã da Nogueira—MadeiraMADJ3064061.42cis- isopulegone (48.71 ± 1.75); (+)-pulegone (32.34 ± 1.70); isopulegol (13.99 ± 0.25)
Helichrysum deviumHdSLPonta de São Lourenço—MadeiraMADJ2107580.44γ-curcumene (34.73 ± 1.06); (−) β-caryophyllene (15.35 ± 0.06)
H. melaleucumHmACAchadas da Cruz—MadeiraMADJ2108030.32(−) β-caryophyllene (45.12 ± 0.26); γ-curcumene (13.67 ± 0.98)
H. obconicumHoSLPonta de São Lourenço—MadeiraMADJ2108100.04(+)-pulegone (40.03 ± 0.45); γ-curcumene (28.00 ± 0.16)
Laurus novocanariensisLnCçCaniço—Madeiran.a.20.36bornyl acetate (23.72 ± 0.02); α terpinyl acetate (15.64 ± 0.04); 1,8-cineole (5.02 ± 0.03)
Mentha pulegiumMpFNFajã da Nogueira—MadeiraMADJ3028610.67(+)-pulegone (54.26 ± 0.29); (−) menthol (31.90 ± 0.02); (+) isomenthone (2.08 ± 0.12)
Ocimum gratissimumOgJAJardim das Aromáticas—Madeiran.a.10.30eugenol (94.56 ± 1.02); (−) β-caryophyllene (1.10 ± 0.26)
Origanum vulgare subsp. virensOvPEFParque Ecológico do Funchal—MadeiraMADJ3062061.90carvacrol (73.04 ± 1.07); γ-terpinene (5.97 ± 0.38); thymol (5.65 ± 0.47)
OvPSPonta do Sol—Madeiran.a.12.01thymol (59.19 ± 0.90); γ-terpinene (14.81 ± 0.75); carvacrol (4.16 ± 0.35)
OvLLSan Cristóbal de La Laguna—Tenerife, Canary Islandn.a.12.04carvacrol (32.18 ± 1.54); thymol (30.91 ± 0.60); γ-terpinene (18.77 ± 0.75)
Syzygium aromaticumSaFxMarket Funchal—Madeiran.a.11.00eugenol (67.48 ± 1.18); (−) β-caryophyllene (29.68 ± 0.95)
Thymus vulgarisTvLLSan Cristóbal de La Laguna—Tenerife, Canary Islandn.a.10.37thymol (63.79 ± 0.56); p-cymene (16.00 ± 0.67); carvacrol (6.91 ± 1.36)
1 Relative percentage (% ± standard deviation); mean of three replicates. n.a.1: commercially acquired; n.a.2: micropropagated from a wild specimen.
Table 2. Estimated values of 50% lethal concentration (ppm) of Meloidogyne javanica second-stage juveniles’ mortality 24 h after exposure (1st 24 h) to eight essential oils and 24 h after replacing the essential oils with water (2nd 24 h).
Table 2. Estimated values of 50% lethal concentration (ppm) of Meloidogyne javanica second-stage juveniles’ mortality 24 h after exposure (1st 24 h) to eight essential oils and 24 h after replacing the essential oils with water (2nd 24 h).
Essential OilCodeLethal Concentration (LC50, ppm)Gradient Equation
R2
1st 24 h2nd 24 h1st 24 h2nd 24 h
Cedronella canariensisCcFN782.30 (758.0 ± 807.10)818.40 (n.a. ± 858.90)y = −25.874x + 126.91
R2 = 0.9511
y = −22.264x + 125.62
R2 = 0.9429
Cinnamomum burmanniiCbFx50.15 (48.64 ± 51.77)51.29 (50.06 ± 53.41)y = −10.937x + 131.05
R2 = 0.5578
y = −10.527x + 129.77
R2 = 0.5671
Clinopodium ascendensCaCf576.90 (541.60 ± 617.90)766.00 (702.00 ± 840.10)y = −17.348x + 92.713
R2 = 0.9604
y = −17.281x + 97.745
R2 = 0.9927
Mentha pulegiumMpFN714.50 (660.60 ± 770.50)684.30 (619.30 ± 748.20)y = −18.111x + 93.835
R2 = 0.9812
y = −21.083x + 124.77
R2 = 0.9873
Ocimum gratissimumOgJA950.30 (n.a.)889.30 (n.a.)y = −35.237x + 140.93
R2 = 0.7500
y = −34.742x + 131.83
R2 = 0.9968
Origanum vulgare subsp. virensOvPEF845.20 (n.a.)840.40 (n.a.)y = −40.712x + 131.90
R2 = 0.9541
y = −38.856x + 132.19
R2 = 0.9466
OvPS1408.00 (n.a.)1414.00 (n.a.)y = −11.570x + 61.808
R2 = 1
y = −3.556x + 53.596
R2 = 1
Syzygium aromaticumSaFx714.60 (654.40 ± 779.90)677.80 (610.30 ± 743.50)y = −26,927x + 129.46
R2 = 0.8770
y = −21,892x + 121.53
R2 = 0.9945
Table 3. Estimated values of 50% lethal concentration (ppm) of Pratylenchus penetrans mixed developmental stages 24 h after exposure (1st 24 h) to five essential oils and 24 h after replacing the essential oils with water (2nd 24 h).
Table 3. Estimated values of 50% lethal concentration (ppm) of Pratylenchus penetrans mixed developmental stages 24 h after exposure (1st 24 h) to five essential oils and 24 h after replacing the essential oils with water (2nd 24 h).
Essential OilCodeLethal Concentration (LC50, ppm)Gradient Equation
R2
1st 24 h2nd 24 h1st 24 h2nd 24 h
Cedronella canariensisCcFN8361.00 (estim.)5965.00 (estim.)y = −3.2291x + 20.573
R2 = 1
y = −11.014x + 33.965
R2 = 1
Cinnamomum burmanniiCbFx99.38 (53.61 ± 129.00)100.20 (53.99 ± 152.30)y = −19.101x + 137.56
R2 = 0.8323
y = −18.783x + 136.36
R2 = 0.8507
Clinopodium ascendensCaCf4580.00 (estim.)5813.00 (estim.)y = −2.9089x + 19,998
R2 = 0.9653
y = −12.263x + 40.204
R2 = 0.9906
Mentha pulegiumMpFN4003.00 (estim.)5904.00 (estim.)y = −6.7306x + 32.355
R2 = 0.7137
y = −11.923x + 42.847
R2 = 0.9826
Ocimum gratissimumOgJA6102.00 (estim.)3663.00 (estim.)y = −4.2339x + 27.163
R2 = 0.9238
y = −6.3945x + 32.704
R2 = 0.9238
Table 4. Estimated values of 50% lethal concentration (ppm) of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus mixed developmental stages, 24 h after exposure (1st 24 h) to four essential oils and 24 h after replacing the essential oils with water (2nd 24 h).
Table 4. Estimated values of 50% lethal concentration (ppm) of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus mixed developmental stages, 24 h after exposure (1st 24 h) to four essential oils and 24 h after replacing the essential oils with water (2nd 24 h).
Essential OilCodeLethal Concentration (LC50, ppm)Gradient Equation
R2
1st 24 h2nd 24 h1st 24 h2nd 24 h
Cedronella canariensisCcFN7883.00 (estim.)7575.00 (estim.)y = −11.253x + 37.343
R2 = 1
y = −12.833x + 39.472
R2 = 0.9969
Cinnamomum burmanniiCbFx110.90 (98.53 ± 122.90)106.60 (98.53 ± 115.00)y = −16.132x + 134.68
R2 = 0.8220
y = −17.360x + 137.63
R2 = 0.8161
Clinopodium ascendensCaCf9875.00 (estim.)7762.00 (estim.)y = −8.0721x + 31.716
R2 = 0.8241
y = −12.661x + 40.684
R2 = 0.9985
Mentha pulegiumMpFN2313.00 (estim.)1959.10 (estim.)y = −18.634x + 62.918
R2 = 0.9774
y = −22.924x + 74.332
R2 = 0.9919
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ferreira, R.; Maleita, C.; Fonseca, L.; Esteves, I.; Sousa-Ferreira, I.; Cabrera, R.; Castilho, P. Chemical Screening and Nematicidal Activity of Essential Oils from Macaronesian and Mediterranean Plants for Controlling Plant-Parasitic Nematodes. Plants 2025, 14, 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030337

AMA Style

Ferreira R, Maleita C, Fonseca L, Esteves I, Sousa-Ferreira I, Cabrera R, Castilho P. Chemical Screening and Nematicidal Activity of Essential Oils from Macaronesian and Mediterranean Plants for Controlling Plant-Parasitic Nematodes. Plants. 2025; 14(3):337. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030337

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ferreira, Rui, Carla Maleita, Luís Fonseca, Ivânia Esteves, Ivo Sousa-Ferreira, Raimundo Cabrera, and Paula Castilho. 2025. "Chemical Screening and Nematicidal Activity of Essential Oils from Macaronesian and Mediterranean Plants for Controlling Plant-Parasitic Nematodes" Plants 14, no. 3: 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030337

APA Style

Ferreira, R., Maleita, C., Fonseca, L., Esteves, I., Sousa-Ferreira, I., Cabrera, R., & Castilho, P. (2025). Chemical Screening and Nematicidal Activity of Essential Oils from Macaronesian and Mediterranean Plants for Controlling Plant-Parasitic Nematodes. Plants, 14(3), 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030337

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop