Next Article in Journal
Differential Mechanisms of Photosynthetic Acclimation to Light and Low Temperature in Arabidopsis and the Extremophile Eutrema salsugineum
Previous Article in Journal
Sphenostylis stenocarpa (ex. A. Rich.) Harms., a Fading Genetic Resource in a Changing Climate: Prerequisite for Conservation and Sustainability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

High Constitutive Overexpression of Glycosyl Hydrolase Family 17 Delays Floral Transition by Enhancing FLC Expression in Transgenic Arabidopsis

Laboratory of Fruit Genetic Engineering, The Institute of Enology and Viticulture, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 400-0005, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2017, 6(3), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants6030031
Submission received: 29 June 2017 / Revised: 16 July 2017 / Accepted: 24 July 2017 / Published: 25 July 2017

Abstract

:
Vitis vinifera glycosyl hydrolase family 17 (VvGHF17) is a grape apoplasmic β-1,3-glucanase, which belongs to glycosyl hydrolase family 17 in grapevines. β-1,3-glucanase is not only involved in plant defense response but also has various physiological functions in plants. Although VvGHF17 expression is negatively related to the length of inflorescence in grapevines, the physiological functions of VvGHF17 are still uncertain. To clarify the physiological functions of VvGHF17, we conducted a phenotypic analysis of VvGHF17-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants. VvGHF17-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants showed short inflorescence, similar to grapevines. These results suggested that VvGHF17 might negatively regulate the length of inflorescence in plants. VvGHF17 expression induced a delay of floral transition in Arabidopsis plants. The expression level of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC), known as a floral repressor gene, in inflorescence meristem of transgenic plants were increased by approximately 10-fold as compared with wild plants. These results suggest that VvGHF17 induces a delay of floral transition by enhancing FLC expression and concomitantly decreases the length of plant inflorescence.

1. Introduction

Higher plants such as vascular plants have certain defense mechanisms against plant pathogens such as fungi, bacteria, and viruses. Pathogenesis-related proteins (PRs) are induced against pathogen invasion in plants and play an important role in plant defense [1]. PRs are classified into 17 families (PR-1 to PR-17) according their characteristics [2]. β-1,3-Glucanases (glucan endo-1,3-β-d-glucosidase, EC 3.2.1.39) belong to the second (PR-2) of the 17 families and are also included in the glycosyl hydrolase family 17 (GHF17) due to their degradation style. Since they hydrolyze 1,3-β-d-glycosidic bonds in β-1,3-glucan as the main component of the cell wall of many fungi [3,4], β-1,3-glucanases are thought to play an important role in the plant defense response against pathogen infection. In our previous study [5], we isolated the apoplasmic β-1,3-glucanase secreted from grape cells and demonstrated that VvGHF17-overexpressing Arabidopsis thaliana acquired multiple resistance to phytopathogenic fungi.
β-1,3-glucan (referred to as callose in plants) is widespread in plant bodies. Thereby, β-1,3-glucanase has various physiological functions in addition to plant defense, such as cell division and elongation [6,7], flower formation [8,9], pollen germination and tube growth [10], fertilization [11], and fruit ripening [12,13]. In particular, understanding the influence of β-1,3-glucanase on traits such as flower formation and subsequent fruit ripening is very important, since their traits are directly linked to the fruit quality which determines the value of fruit trees. However, there are few reports that β-1,3-glucanase has physiological functions affecting plant growth in grapevines, and its physiological functions are still uncertain.
To understand the physiological functions of VvGHF17 in the vegetative and/or reproductive growth of grapevines, we conducted a phenotypic analysis of VvGHF17-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants. The present study demonstrates that VvGHF17 delays floral transition in Arabidopsis plant through enhancing FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) expression, which is the transcription factor functioning as a repressor of floral transition.

2. Results

2.1. VvGHF17 Expression Is Negatively Related to the Length of Grape Inflorescence

A simple linear regression analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between the inflorescence length and the gene expression level of endogenous VvGHF17 in grape cultivars. Endogenous VvGHF17 expression in young grape inflorescence showed a strong negative correlation with the length of mature grape inflorescence (p = 0.0091) (Figure 1a). This result suggested that VvGHF17 might function in the vegetative and/or reproductive growth of grapevines.

2.2. VvGHF17 Induce Delays of Floral Transition

The phenotypic analysis of VvGHF17-overexpressing transgenic Arabidopsis obtained by our previous study [5] was performed to clarify the detailed physiological function of VvGHF17. The growth of the main inflorescence stem of VvGHF17-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants (OE2 and OE3) tended to be poor (Figure 1b). The length of these stems was significantly lower than those of wild plants at 31 days after sowing (Figure 1c). In addition, the number of rosette leaves of transgenic plants (OE2 and OE3) was significantly higher compared with wild plants (Figure 2a,b). VvGHF17 induced a delay of floral transition in VvGHF17-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants (Figure 2c). These results indicate a delay of floral transition in VvGHF17-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants and a lower the elongation of their inflorescence.

2.3. VvGHF17 Upregulates FLOWERING LOCUS C Expression

To determine the molecular mechanism on the delay of floral transition in the VvGHF17-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants, we analyzed the expression level of the FLC gene, which is a floral repressor gene [14], in each plant. FLC expression levels in OE2 and OE3 were increased by 10.12- and 8.76-fold compared to those of wild plants, respectively (Figure 2d). This result suggests that VvGHF17 delays floral transition through the alternation of floral repression.

3. Discussion

We demonstrated that VvGHF17 induces floral transition in Arabidopsis plants. The number of rosette leaves formed before the appearance of the inflorescence meristem was measured as an indicator of floral transition, because there is a positive correlation between the number of rosette leaves and floral transition [15]. The number of rosette leaves in VvGHF17-overxpressing plants (OE2 and OE3) was higher compared with that of wild plants (Figure 2a,b). Flowering day was delayed as well (Figure 2c). These results indicate that the vegetative growth period of VvGHF17-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants became longer than those of wild plants. However, there was no significant difference between OE1 and wild plants in this study. This may be due to the fact that the expression level of VvGHF17 in OE1 is much lower than those of OE2 and OE3 in our previous report [5].
Figure 3 shows the relationship between the VvGHF17 and floral transition suggested from this study. Floral transition is controlled through four pathways: autonomous, vernalization, photoperiod, and gibberellin pathways. FLC encodes a MADS domain protein, which conserved sequence motif with many transcription factors, and integrates signals through autonomous and vernalization pathways. FLC acts as a repressor of flowering [15]. VvGHF17 enhances the expression level of FLC directly or indirectly by an unknown mechanism. SUPPRESSOR OF CO OVEREXPRESSION 1 (SOC1), FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), and LEAFY (LFY) are known as floral integrators and are upregulated by photoperiod and gibberellin pathways, respectively [16,17]. The expression of FLC downregulates the expression levels of SOC1, FT, and LFY. Therefore, FLC upregulation in VvGHF17-overexpressing plants induces a delay of floral transition. This is the first report, to our knowledge, that β-1,3-glucanase affects the timing of floral transition. However, since FLC is controlled by many genes in the autonomous and vernalization pathways [18], it is still unclear, according to this study, whether VvGHF17 directly or indirectly controls FLC through any of the genes of these two pathways.
Endogenous GHF17 is highly expressed at the stage of flower formation [8] and fruit ripening [12]. Thus, multifunction of β-1,3-glucanase in vegetative and/or reproductive growth and in floral transition remains still unclear. So far, we could not demonstrate any mechanisms from VvGHF17 expression to FLC expression. On the other hand, β-1,3-glucanase hydrolyses β-1,3-glucans is not only from fungal cell walls, but also from callose in plants. Flax overproducing β-1,3-glucanase changes cell wall composition and shows a decrease in callose (endogenic β-1,3-glucan) content as well as an increase in particular polysaccharides contents [19]. Therefore, the delay of floral transition in VvGHF17-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants might be due to the change of plant cell wall composition by VvGHF17, resulting in a change in cell growth. Further studies employing transcriptional analyses of genes located upstream of FLC in addition to surveys of cell wall composition in inflorescence would reveal the molecular mechanisms of the relationship between VvGHF17 and floral transition.
VvGHF17 has the function of multiple disease resistance against phytopathogenic fungi [5]. Generally, the longer the period of vegetative growth in grapevines, the higher the quality of the grape berries. Therefore, the production of VvGHF17-overexpressing grapevines could lead to the breeding of grapevines with disease resistance and good fruit quality. Although we revealed that VvGHF17 influences floral transition, the influence of VvGHF17 on fruit traits after flowering such as yield and fruit quality are still unknown. In the future, field research focusing disease resistance and quality and quantity of grape berries on VvGHF17-overexpressing grapevines would be required for an evaluation of genetically engineered grapevines.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

Grape cultivars in the test field of The Institute of Enology and Viticulture, University of Yamanashi (Japan), were used as plant materials. Grape bunches of each grapevine cultivar (Vitis vinifera cvs. Cabernet Sauvignon, Koshu, Merlot, Pinot Noir, and Riesling) were collected at young and mature stages in 2015. The length of mature grape inflorescences was measured.
Arabidopsis thaliana wild type (Col-0), pRI101-AN vector-transformed Arabidopsis plants (pRI) and VvGHF17-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants (OE1, OE2, and OE3), which were obtained in our previous study [5], were used as plant materials. T3 (third generation transgenic plant) homozygote seeds were sown in rockwool (2.5 cm × 2.5 cm × 3.8 cm) and grown in an incubator (11.8 W−2/16 h/day, 22 °C). One week after sowing, the seedlings were moved to the soil together with the rock wool and grown in the incubator under same conditions.

4.2. Phenotypic Analysis in Arabidopsis Plants

After sowing each Arabidopsis plant, their phenotypes were observed daily. The length of the main inflorescence stem at 4 weeks after sowing, as well as the number of rosette leaves per plant at the appearance of an inflorescence, and the time to flowering was measured.

4.3. Isolation of Total RNA

We isolated the total RNA from the inflorescence meristem of grape and Arabidopsis plants. Young grape inflorescences of 3–8 mm in the longitudinal direction of each cultivar were used. The inflorescence meristems of 20-day-old Arabidopsis plants before the appearance of an inflorescence were used. After freezing these samples with liquid nitrogen, the samples were homogenized with an SK mill (SK-200) (Tokken, Kashiwa, Japan). According to the manufacturer’s instructions, total RNA was isolated from these homogenized samples using Nucleospin RNA plant (Takara, Otsu, Japan).

4.4. Real-Time RT-PCR

First-strand cDNA were synthesized from the total RNA using a PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara) and subsequently used for real-time (RT)-PCR analysis. RT-PCR analysis was performed using an SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara) by Thermal Cycler Dice Real-Time System Single Software ver. 3.00 (Takara) and the standard curve method. Reaction conditions were as follows: 37 °C for 15 min, 85 °C for 5 s, 40 cycles at 95 °C for 5 s, and 60 °C for 30 s. Primer sequences were as follows: Arabidopsis FLC primers (5′-GAGCCAAGAAGACCGAACTCA-3′ and 5′-TCTCAGCTTCTGCTCCCACA-3′, GenBank accession no. NM_121052) and Arabidopsis actin primers (5′-GCCGACAGAATGAGCAAAGAG-3′ and 5′-AGGTACTGAGGGAGGCCAAGA-3′, GenBank accession no. NM_179953). VvGHF17 primers were used as described previously [5]. FLC and VvGHF17 expression levels were normalized to each actin, and relative expression of FLC in Arabidopsis plants were represented as values relative to the controls (wild plants).

4.5. Simple Linear Regression Analysis

Simple linear regression analysis between the length of mature grape inflorescence and the relative expression of VvGHF17 in young grape inflorescence was conducted using Excel statistics software 2012 (Social Survey Research Information, Tokyo, Japan). The dependent and explanatory variables were the length of grape inflorescence and the relative expression of VvGHF17, respectively.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

The data are shown as means ± standard errors in the tests with Arabidopsis plants. These data were statistically analyzed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test using Excel statistics software 2012 (Social Survey Research Information, Tokyo, Japan).

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Shiho Ishiai of University of Yamanashi for technical advice and assistance.

Author Contributions

Shinichi Enoki and Nozomi Fujimori conceived and designed the experiments; Shinichi Enoki and Nozomi Fujimori performed the experiments; Chiho Yamaguchi and Tomoki Hattori analyzed the data; Shinichi Enoki and Shunji Suzuki wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stintzi, A.; Heitz, T.; Prasad, V.; Wiedemann-Merdinoglu, S.; Kauffmann, S.; Geoffroy, P.; Legrand, M.; Fritig, B. Plant ‘pathogenesis-related’ proteins and their role in defense against pathogens. Biochimie 1993, 75, 687–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Van Loon, L.C.; Rep, M.; Pieterse, C.M.J. Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2006, 44, 135–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Adams, D.J. Fungal cell wall chitinases and glucanases. Microbiology 2004, 150, 2029–2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Simmons, C.R. The physiology and molecular biology of plant 1,3-β-d-glucanases and 1,3;1,4-β-d-glucanases. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1994, 13, 325–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fujimori, N.; Enoki, S.; Suzuki, A.; Naznin, H.A.; Shimizu, M.; Suzuki, S. Grape apoplasmic β-1,3-glucanase confers fungal disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 200, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fulcher, R.G.; McCully, M.E.; Setterfield, G.; Sutherland, J. β-1,3-glucans may be associated with cell plate formation during cytokinesis. Can. J. Bot. 1976, 54, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Masuda, Y.; Wada, S. Effect of beta-3-glucanase on elongation growth of oat coleoptile. Bot. Mag. 1967, 80, 100–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Akiyama, T.; Pillai, M.A.; Sentoku, N. Cloning, characterization and expression of OsGLN2, a rice endo-1,3-β-glucanase gene regulated developmentally in flowers and hormonally in germinating seeds. Planta 2004, 220, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kauffmann, S.; Legrand, M.; Geoffroy, P.; Fritig, B. Biological function of ‘pathogenesis-related’ proteins: Four PR proteins of tobacco have 1,3-β-glucanase activity. EMBO J. 1987, 6, 3209–3212. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Meikle, P.J.; Bonig, I.; Hoogenraad, N.J.; Clarke, A.E.; Stone, B.A. The location of (1–3)-β-glucans in the walls of pollen tubes of Nicotiana alata using a (1–3)-β-glucan-specific monoclonal antibody. Planta 1991, 185, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ori, N.; Sessa, G.; Lotan, T.; Himmelhoch, S.; Fluhr, R. A major stylar matrix polypeptide (sp41) is a member of the pathogenesis-related proteins superclass. EMBO J. 1990, 9, 3429–3436. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Deytieux, C.; Geny, L.; Lapailerie, D.; Claverol, S.; Bonneu, M.; Donèche, B. Proteome analysis of grape skins during ripening. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 1851–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hinton, D.M.; Pressey, R. Glucanases in fruits and vegetables. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1980, 9, 499–502. [Google Scholar]
  14. Michaels, S.D.; Amasino, R.M. FLOWERING LOCUS C encodes a novel MADS domain protein that acts as a repressor of flowering. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 949–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Koornneef, M.; Hanhart, C.J.; van der Veen, J.H. A genetic and physiological analysis of late flowering mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1991, 229, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Parcy, F. Flowering: A time for integration. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2005, 49, 585–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Simpson, G.G.; Dean, C. Arabidopsis, the Rosetta stone of flowering time? Science 2002, 296, 285–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, N.; Wen, J.; Zimmer, E.A. Expression patterns of AP1, FUL, FT and LEAFY orthologs in Vitaceae support the homology of tendrils and inflorescences throughout the grape family. J. Syst. Evol. 2015, 53, 469–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wojtasik, W.; Kulma, A.; Dymińska, L.; Hanuza, J.; Żebrowski, J.; Szopa, J. Fibres from flax overproducing β-1,3-glucanase show increased accumulation of pectin and phenolics and thus higher antioxidant capacity. BMC Biotechnol. 2013, 13, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. VvGHF17 expression suppresses inflorescence growth in plants. (a) Regression line between the length of mature grape inflorescence and endogenous VvGHF17 expression in young grape inflorescence. Averages (n = 10) are plotted in the graph. Cs, Cabernet Sauvignon; Ko, Koshu; Me, Merlot; Pn, Pinot Noir; Ri, Riesling grapevine cultivars. (b) VvGHF17-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants. Photograph was obtained at 31 days after sowing. Scale bar = 7.5 cm. (c) Length of main inflorescence of VvGHF17-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants. Bars indicate means ± standard errors (n = 5). ** p < 0.01 as compared with wild plants.
Figure 1. VvGHF17 expression suppresses inflorescence growth in plants. (a) Regression line between the length of mature grape inflorescence and endogenous VvGHF17 expression in young grape inflorescence. Averages (n = 10) are plotted in the graph. Cs, Cabernet Sauvignon; Ko, Koshu; Me, Merlot; Pn, Pinot Noir; Ri, Riesling grapevine cultivars. (b) VvGHF17-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants. Photograph was obtained at 31 days after sowing. Scale bar = 7.5 cm. (c) Length of main inflorescence of VvGHF17-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants. Bars indicate means ± standard errors (n = 5). ** p < 0.01 as compared with wild plants.
Plants 06 00031 g001
Figure 2. VvGHF17 delays floral transition by enhancing FLC expression in VvGHF17-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants. (a) Photograph of VvGHF17-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants at 26 days after sowing. Scale bar = 7.5 cm. (b) Number of rosette leaves formed before the appearance of the inflorescence meristem. (c) Time to flowering. Bars indicate means ± standard errors (n = 5). (d) FLC expression. Total RNA was isolated from inflorescence meristems of 20-day-old Arabidopsis plants and subjected to real-time RT-PCR analysis. Bars indicate means ± standard errors (n = 12). ** p < 0.01 as compared with wild plants.
Figure 2. VvGHF17 delays floral transition by enhancing FLC expression in VvGHF17-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants. (a) Photograph of VvGHF17-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants at 26 days after sowing. Scale bar = 7.5 cm. (b) Number of rosette leaves formed before the appearance of the inflorescence meristem. (c) Time to flowering. Bars indicate means ± standard errors (n = 5). (d) FLC expression. Total RNA was isolated from inflorescence meristems of 20-day-old Arabidopsis plants and subjected to real-time RT-PCR analysis. Bars indicate means ± standard errors (n = 12). ** p < 0.01 as compared with wild plants.
Plants 06 00031 g002
Figure 3. Theoretical model of VvGHF17-mediated delay of floral transition. Floral transition is controlled through four pathways: autonomous, vernalization, photoperiod, and gibberellin pathways. FLC encodes a MADS domain protein and integrates signal through autonomous and vernalization pathways. FLC acts as a repressor of flowering. VvGHF17 enhances the expression level of FLC directly or indirectly by an unknown mechanism. FLC represses the expression levels of SOC1, FT, and LFY, which are floral integrators. Therefore, VvGHF17 delays floral transition. FLC, FLOWERING LOCUS C; SOC1, SUPPRESSOR OF CO OVEREXPRESSION 1; FT, FLOWERING LOCUS T; LFY, LEAFY.
Figure 3. Theoretical model of VvGHF17-mediated delay of floral transition. Floral transition is controlled through four pathways: autonomous, vernalization, photoperiod, and gibberellin pathways. FLC encodes a MADS domain protein and integrates signal through autonomous and vernalization pathways. FLC acts as a repressor of flowering. VvGHF17 enhances the expression level of FLC directly or indirectly by an unknown mechanism. FLC represses the expression levels of SOC1, FT, and LFY, which are floral integrators. Therefore, VvGHF17 delays floral transition. FLC, FLOWERING LOCUS C; SOC1, SUPPRESSOR OF CO OVEREXPRESSION 1; FT, FLOWERING LOCUS T; LFY, LEAFY.
Plants 06 00031 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Enoki, S.; Fujimori, N.; Yamaguchi, C.; Hattori, T.; Suzuki, S. High Constitutive Overexpression of Glycosyl Hydrolase Family 17 Delays Floral Transition by Enhancing FLC Expression in Transgenic Arabidopsis. Plants 2017, 6, 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants6030031

AMA Style

Enoki S, Fujimori N, Yamaguchi C, Hattori T, Suzuki S. High Constitutive Overexpression of Glycosyl Hydrolase Family 17 Delays Floral Transition by Enhancing FLC Expression in Transgenic Arabidopsis. Plants. 2017; 6(3):31. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants6030031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Enoki, Shinichi, Nozomi Fujimori, Chiho Yamaguchi, Tomoki Hattori, and Shunji Suzuki. 2017. "High Constitutive Overexpression of Glycosyl Hydrolase Family 17 Delays Floral Transition by Enhancing FLC Expression in Transgenic Arabidopsis" Plants 6, no. 3: 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants6030031

APA Style

Enoki, S., Fujimori, N., Yamaguchi, C., Hattori, T., & Suzuki, S. (2017). High Constitutive Overexpression of Glycosyl Hydrolase Family 17 Delays Floral Transition by Enhancing FLC Expression in Transgenic Arabidopsis. Plants, 6(3), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants6030031

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop