Next Article in Journal
Rotor Performance Predictions for Urban Air Mobility: Single vs. Coaxial Rigid Rotors
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Wave Propagation with Different Magnetic Configurations in Helicon Plasmas
Previous Article in Journal
A Static Stability Analysis Method for Passively Stabilized Sounding Rockets
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modelling of Cryopumps for Space Electric Propulsion Usage
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Transient Characteristics of Fluidic Pintle Nozzle in a Solid Rocket Motor

Aerospace 2024, 11(3), 243; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11030243
by Dongfeng Yan 1,*, Zehang Zhao 1, Anchen Song 2, Fengming Li 1, Lu Ye 1, Ganchao Zhao 1 and Shan Ma 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Aerospace 2024, 11(3), 243; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11030243
Submission received: 5 February 2024 / Revised: 13 March 2024 / Accepted: 16 March 2024 / Published: 20 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Chemical Propulsion and Electric Propulsion)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

See attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

In their article, the authors conduct a comprehensive review of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) studies pertaining to fluidic pintle nozzles. They explore various aspects of the system through multiple CFD simulations, shedding light on its performance under different conditions. This thorough analysis contributes significantly to the understanding and advancement of fluidic pintle nozzle technology, providing valuable insights for its development and optimization.

There is a small error in Fig. 2, as it shows the radius of the combustion chamber as 60 mm, where it should be 30 mm.

The manuscript is very complete and shows lots of simulation results, with significant discussion of the system under different conditions.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

A minor english review is recommended, as there are some small errors in the manuscript, i.e. "attitude" instead of "altitude" in line 37, or "contorl" instead of "control" in line 49.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

All comments have been sufficiently adressed.

Back to TopTop