Parameter Identification Method for a Periodic Time-Varying System Using a Block-Pulse Function
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
-As authors mentioned in the abstract about the saving time of the proposed scheme, it seems a bit lacking support evidence. It would be nice if author can overcome it in the revision.
-Currently, they have some algorithm for parameters or functions estimations such as NN
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.036001 |
Data driven https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.06.051,
Monte Carlo methods 10.1186/s13634-020-00675-6
and so on. Could authors discuss about them in order to emphasize the advantage of the proposed approach.!
- Furthermore, please verify some TeX errors such that page 3 line 108.
- Does it require the assumption for the compact set of the state x(t) \in \Omega_x in order to obtain the solution proposed by this work?
- The experimental results seem sufficient but the conclusion needs to be revised according to the results and the main contributions of this paper.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Authors already revised and considered for all reviewers' comments.