Adolescent ELLs Improve Their Academic English while Learning about the UN Online
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Background
2.1. A Language-through-Content Approach
2.2. Language Learning and Peace Education
2.3. Technology and Language Learning
2.4. The Role of Consultants
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Research Questions
- What are the adolescent consultants’ perceptions regarding the usefulness of units and activities of ATW for improving their ESL skills?
- To what degree does the unit content confirm, and/or challenge learners’ understandings of the role of the UN around the world?
- What is the role of technology in the ATW online course in promoting the learning of language and/or content?
- What are the teacher’s perceptions regarding the use of ATW with her students?
- What improvements and/or revisions to ATW in content and technology are suggested by the insights gleaned from the consultants and their teacher?
3.2. Researchers
3.3. Student Participants
3.4. Class Description
3.5. Data Sources
3.6. Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Descriptive Comparison of Quantitative Items from Pre- and Post-Questionnaires
4.2. Open-Ended Comments from the Post-Questionnaire
4.3. Student Themes
4.3.1. Positive Overall View of Online Course (RQ1)
4.3.2. Importance of Visuals for Teens (RQ1, 3)
4.3.3. Gaps in Background Knowledge (RQ2)
4.3.4. Vocabulary Support Helpful (RQ1, 3)
4.3.5. More Grammar (RQ1, 3)
4.3.6. Strategies When They Do Not Understand (RQ1, 3)
4.3.7. Mixed Views Regarding Peer Support (RQ1)
4.3.8. Preferred Language of Explanation (RQ1)
4.3.9. Recognition of UN Contribution (RQ2)
4.3.10. Technical Issues (RQ3)
4.3.11. Appreciation of Consultant Role (RQ1)
4.3.12. Favorite Units (RQ1, 2)
4.3.13. Recommendations for Change (RQ5)
4.4. Teacher Themes (RQ4)
4.4.1. The Unit Was More Challenging for Learners than Expected
4.4.2. There Are Practical Barriers to Using the Site in My Classroom
4.4.3. Gaps in Background Knowledge
4.4.4. Suggestions for Pedagogy
4.4.5. Need for Differentiation
4.4.6. Clarifying Goals and Integration in Regular Lessons
4.4.7. Independent Use of Site versus Guided In-Class Use
4.4.8. Future Projects
4.5. Researcher Themes (RQ3, 5)
4.5.1. Student Strategies in Making Meaning
4.5.2. Differentiation Observed
4.5.3. Peer Support
4.5.4. First Language Support
4.5.5. Learner Differences in L1 Academic Proficiency and Cultural Knowledge
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Sample Pre-Questionnaire for Students
Appendix B. Sample Post-Questionnaire for Students
Appendix C. Sample Interview Questions for Students
Appendix D. Sample Interview Questions for the Teacher
References
- ACTFL. 2012. ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines. Available online: https://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/public/ACTFLProficiencyGuidelines2012_FINAL.pdf (accessed on 31 January 2019).
- Allwright, Dick, and Judith Hanks. 2009. The Developing Language Learner: An Introduction to Exploratory Practice. In Research and Practice in Applied Linguistics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
- Asakereh, Ahmad, and Nouroddin Yousofi. 2018. Reflective Thinking, Self-Efficacy, Self-Esteem and Academic Achievement of Iranian EFL Students in Higher Education: Is There a Relationship? International Journal of Educational Psychology 7: 68–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benati, Alessandro. 2013. Issues in Second Language Teaching. Sheffield: Equinox. [Google Scholar]
- Bhatia, Vijay. 2014. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Canagarajah, A. Suresh. 2013. Translingual Practice: Global Englishes and Cosmopolitan Relations. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Chapelle, Carol. 2005. Hints about CALL Use from Research. PacCALL Journal 1: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Chapelle, Carol, and Joan Jamieson. 2008. Tips for Teaching CALL. White Plains: Pearson Education ESL. [Google Scholar]
- Charmaz, Kathy. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. Los Angeles: SAGE. [Google Scholar]
- Chatel, Regina G. 2002. New Technology, New Literacy: Creating a Bridge for English Language Learners. New England Reading Association Journal 38: 45–49. [Google Scholar]
- Commission of the European Communities. 2003. Communication No. 449. On Promoting Language Learning and Linguistic Diversity: An Action Plan 2004–2006. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2003:0449:FIN:EN:PDF (accessed on 5 December 2018).
- Coyle, Do, Philip Hood, and David Marsh. 2010. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Creswell, John W. 2007. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. [Google Scholar]
- Crystal, David. 2004. Creating a World of Languages. Introductory speech presented at the 10th Linguapax Congress, Barcelona, Spain, May 20. [Google Scholar]
- Daud, Nuraihan Mat, and Zamnah Husin. 2004. Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Computer-Aided Extended Reading Classes. British Journal of Educational Technology 35: 477–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doughty, Catherine, and Jessica Williams. 1998. Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Dumitrescu, Virginia Mihaela. 2014. Effective Web 2.0 Technologies for Second-Language Teaching and Learning. Elearning & Software for Education 3: 148–55. [Google Scholar]
- Ebsworth, Miriam Eisenstein, Alexis Jeong Kim, and Tristin J. Klein. 2010. Projections: From a Graduate TELL Class to the Practical World of L2 Teachers. CALICO Journal 27: 349–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellis, Rod. 2015. The Importance of Focus on Form in Communicative Language Teaching. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics 1: 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Furstenberg, Gilberte, Sabine Levet, Kathryn English, and Katherine Maillet. 2001. Giving a Virtual Voice to the Silent Language of Culture: The Cultura Project. Language Learning and Technology 5: 55–102. [Google Scholar]
- García, Ofelia. 2009. Education, Multilingualism and Translanguaging in the 21st Century. In Multilingual Education for Social Justice: Globalising the Local. Edited by Ajit Mohanty, Minati Panda, Robert Phillipson and Tove Skutnabb-Kangas. New Delhi: Orient Balckswan, pp. 128–45. [Google Scholar]
- Gimeno, Ana. 2008. How Can CLIL Benefit from the Integration of Information and Communications Technologies? In Linguistic Insights—Studies in Language and Communication. Edited by Maurizio Gotti. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 77–102. [Google Scholar]
- González, Norma, Luis C. Moll, and Cathy Amanti, eds. 2009. Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing Practices in Households, Communities, and Classrooms. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Granberg, Ellen. 2000. How Technology Enhances Teaching and Learning. Teaching Forum 3. Available online: https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/articles-and-essays/the-teaching-forum/how-technology-enhances-teaching-and-learning/ (accessed on 1 December 2018).
- Hamdan, Amani K. 2014. The Reciprocal and Correlative Relationship between Learning Culture and Online Education: A Case from Saudi Arabia. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 15: 309–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hinkel, Eli, ed. 2017. Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning: Volume 3, 1st ed. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Hirsch, E. D. 2013. Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know. Ashland: Blackstone Audio Inc. [Google Scholar]
- Honicke, Toni, and Jaclyn Broadbent. 2016. The Influence of Academic Self-Efficacy on Academic Performance: A Systematic Review. Educational Research Review 17: 63–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hubbard, Philip. 2008. CALL and the Future of Language Teacher Education. CALICO Journal 25: 175–88. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Hoe Kyeung. 2008. Beyond Motivation: ESL/EFL Teachers’ Perceptions of the Role of Computers. CALICO Journal 25: 240–59. [Google Scholar]
- Kuure, Leena, Tonja Molin-Juustila, Tiina Keisanen, Maritta Riekki, Netta Iivari, and Marianne Kinnula. 2016. Switching Perspectives: From a Language Teacher to a Designer of Language Learning with New Technologies. Computer Assisted Language Learning 29: 925–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leech, Nancy L., and Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie. 2007. An Array of Qualitative Data Analysis Tools: A Call for Data Analysis Triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly 22: 557–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, Michael, and Peter Robinson. 1998. Focus on Form: Theory, Research and Practice. In Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Edited by Catherine Doughty and Jessica Williams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15–41. [Google Scholar]
- Luke, Christopher L., and Jody S. Britten. 2007. The Expanding Role of Technology in Foreign Language Teacher Education Programs. CALICO Journal 24: 253–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mackey, Alison. 2006. Feedback, Noticing and Instructed Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics 27: 405–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mackey, Alison, and Susan M. Gass. 2016. Second Language Research, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- McDermott, Geraldine. 2017. Towards a Culturally Responsive Pedagogy in Online Teaching: An Irish Perspective. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 9: 3111–19. [Google Scholar]
- Mohan, Bernard A. 1986. Language and Content. Reading: Addison Wesley. [Google Scholar]
- Moll, Luis C., Cathy Amanti, Deborah Neff, and Norma González. 1992. Funds of Knowledge for Teaching: Using a Qualitative Approach to Connect Homes and Classrooms. Theory into Practice 31: 132–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, Sarah Catherine K. 2009. Uses of Technology in the Instruction of Adult English Language Learners. CAELA NETWORK Brief. Available online: http://www.cal.org/adultesl/pdfs/uses-of-technology-in-the-instruction-of-adult-ell.pdf (accessed on 1 December 2018).
- Nero, Shondel, and Dohra Ahmad. 2014. Vernaculars in the Classroom: Paradoxes, Pedagogy, Possibilities, 1st ed. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Osborn, Terry A. 2006. Teaching World Languages for Social Justice: A Sourcebook of Principles and Practices, 1st ed. Mahwah: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Pongsiriwet, Charuporn. 2001. Relationships among Grammatical Accuracy, Discourse Features, and the Quality of Second Language Writing: The Case of Thai EFL Learners. Morgantown: West Virginia University Libraries. [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez-Arroyo, Sandra, and Ashley Brailsford Vaughns. 2015. Is Service-Learning the Answer? Preparing Teacher Candidates to Work with ELLs through Service-Learning Experiences. New Waves-Educational Research and Development Journal: Special Issue on Service Learning in Education 18: 18–35. [Google Scholar]
- Savin-Baden, Maggi, and Claire Howell Major. 2013. Qualitative Research: The Essential Guide to Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Schleppegrell, Mary, and Frances Christie. 2018. Linguistic Features of Writing Development: A Functional Perspective. In The Lifespan Development of Writing. Edited by Charles Bazerman, Arthur N. Applebee, Virginia W. Berninger, Deborah Brandt, Steve Graham, Jill V. Jeffery, Paul Kei Matsuda, Sandra Murphy, Deborah Wells Rowe, Mary Schleppegrell and et al. Urbana: NCTE (National Council of Teachers of English), pp. 111–50. [Google Scholar]
- Tardy, Christine M. 2016. Beyond Convention: Genre Innovation in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. [Google Scholar]
- TOOLS. n.d. Tools for CLIL Teachers. Available online: http://languages.dk/tools/index.htm (accessed on 12 December 2018).
- Warschauer, Mark, Michele Knobel, and Leeann Stone. 2004. Technology and Equity in Schooling: Deconstructing the Digital Divide. Educational Policy 18: 562–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Frequency | Percent | |
---|---|---|
0–10 hours | 18 | 94.7 |
41+ hours | 1 | 5.3 |
Total | 19 | 100.0 |
Frequency | Percent | |
---|---|---|
0–10 hours | 4 | 21.1 |
11–20 hours | 3 | 15.8 |
21–30 hours | 4 | 21.1 |
31–40 hours | 6 | 31.6 |
41+ hours | 2 | 10.5 |
Total | 19 | 100.0 |
Item | Pre (N = 18) Mean (SD) | Post (N = 14) Mean (SD) |
---|---|---|
1. Promoting world peace | 3.67 (0.77) | 3.69 (0.86) |
2. Helping countries with health and wellness | 3.72 (1.07) | 4.15 (0.99) |
3. Helping with education | 4.17 (0.71) | 4.38 (0.87) |
4. Protecting and supporting children worldwide | 4.28 (0.90) | 4.00 (1.00) |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Eisenstein Ebsworth, M.; Cai, C.; McCoy, L. Adolescent ELLs Improve Their Academic English while Learning about the UN Online. Languages 2019, 4, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4010009
Eisenstein Ebsworth M, Cai C, McCoy L. Adolescent ELLs Improve Their Academic English while Learning about the UN Online. Languages. 2019; 4(1):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4010009
Chicago/Turabian StyleEisenstein Ebsworth, Miriam, Chencen Cai, and Lauren McCoy. 2019. "Adolescent ELLs Improve Their Academic English while Learning about the UN Online" Languages 4, no. 1: 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4010009
APA StyleEisenstein Ebsworth, M., Cai, C., & McCoy, L. (2019). Adolescent ELLs Improve Their Academic English while Learning about the UN Online. Languages, 4(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4010009