Prevention Village Fund Fraud in Indonesia: Moral Sensitivity as a Moderating Variable
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Methodology
3.1. Population and Sample
3.2. Research Design and Data Sources
3.3. Definition of Transformation Activities
3.4. Data Analysis Method
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Descriptive Statistical Analysis Results
4.2. Discussion
4.2.1. Internal Control System on the Prevention of Village Fund Fraud
4.2.2. Appropriate Compensation on Prevention Village Fund Fraud
4.2.3. Village Apparatus Competence on the Prevention of Village Fund Fraud
4.2.4. Moral Sensitivity as Moderating Effect of Internal Control System on Preventing Village Fund Fraud
5. Conclusions
Research Limitations
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Abdallah, Aisha, Mohd Aizaini Maarof, and Anazida Zainal. 2016. Fraud detection system: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 68: 90–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Althof, Wolfgang, and Marvin W. Berkowitz. 2006. Moral education and character education: Their relationship and roles in citizenship education. Journal of Moral Education 35: 495–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alwi, Hersugondo H., Nabila A. Parmitasari, and Imang Dapit Pamungkas. 2021. The Role of Non-Performing Asset, Capital, Adequacy and Insolvency Risk on Bank Performance: A Case Study in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business 8: 319–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antaranews. 2019. ICW: Kasus Korupsi Dana Desa Terbanyak Sepanjang 2018. Available online: https://www.antaranews.com/berita/796085/icw-kasus-korupsi-dana-desa-terbanyak-sepanjang-2018 (accessed on 1 June 2021).
- Appuhami, Ranjith, and Mohammed Bhuyan. 2015. Examining the influence of corporate governance on intellectual capital efficiency evidence from top service firms in Australia. Managerial Auditing Journal 30: 347–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Apriliana, Siska, and Linda Agustina. 2017. The Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Determinant through Fraud Pentagon Approach. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi 9: 154–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Atmadja, Anantawikrama Tungga, Komang Adi Kurniawan Saputra, and M. K. Koswara. 2018. The influence of village conflict, village apparatus ability, village facilitator competency and commitment of local government on the success of budget management. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal 22: 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Atmadja, Anantawikrama Tungga, Komang Adi Kurniawan Saputra, and Daniel T. H. Manurung. 2019. Proactive fraud audit, whistleblowing and cultural implementation of tri hita karana for fraud prevention. European Research Studies Journal 22: 201–14. [Google Scholar]
- Basri, Yesi Mutia, Olga Fadilla, and Al Azhar. 2021. Determinants of Fraud in the Village Government: The Pentagon’s Fraud Perspective. Journal of Accounting Research, Organization and Economics 4: 173–87. [Google Scholar]
- Cressey, Donald R. 1953. Other People’s Money; A Study of the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. Glencoe: Free Press, pp. 1–300. [Google Scholar]
- Dung, Nguyen Ngoc Khanh, and Dang Anh Tuan. 2019. The study of audit expectation gap: The auditor’s responsibilities in a financial statement audit in Vietnam. Asian Economic and Financial Review 9: 1227–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ekananda, Mahjus, and Tulus Suryanto. 2021. The influence of global financial liquidity on the indonesian economy: Dynamic analysis with threshold var. Economies 9: 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elfaki, Khalid Eltayeb, Rossanto Dwi Handoyo, and Kabiru Hannafi Ibrahim. 2021. The Impact of Industrialization, Trade Openness, Financial Development, and Energy Consumption on Economic Growth in Indonesia. Economies 9: 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandhytia, Fernanda, and Muslichah Muslichah. 2020. The Effect of Internal Control, Individual Morality and Ethical Value on Accounting Fraud Tendency. Media Ekonomi dan Manajemen 35: 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ghozali, Imam. 2016. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 21: Update PLS Regresi. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro. [Google Scholar]
- Halbouni, Sawsan Saadi, Nada Obeid, and Abeer Garbou. 2016. Corporate governance and information technology in fraud prevention and detection: Evidence from the UAE. Managerial Auditing Journal 31: 589–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Handayani, Bestari, Abdul Rohman, Anis Chariri, and Imang Pamungkas. 2020. Corporate financial performance on corporate governance mechanism and corporate value: Evidence from Indonesia. Montenegrin Journal of Economics 16: 161–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayati, Nur, and Ikklimatus Amalia. 2021. The effect of religiosity and moderation of morality on fraud prevention in the management of village funds. The Indonesian Accounting Review 11: 105–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Husnawati, Nurul, Lilik Handajani, and M. Irwan. 2017. Accounting Fraud: Determinant, Moderation of Internal Control System And The Implication To Financial Accountability. E-Proceeding Stie 60: 311–35. Available online: http://jurnal.stie-mandala.ac.id/index.php/eproceeding/article/view/139/0 (accessed on 17 June 2021).
- Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jordan, Jennifer. 2007. Taking the first step toward a moral action: A review of moral sensitivity measurement across domains. Journal of Genetic Psychology 168: 323–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khadim, Zunaira, Irem Batool, Ahsan Akbar, Petra Poulova, and Minahs Akbar. 2021. Mapping the moderating role of logistics performance of logistics infrastructure on economic growth in developing countries. Economies 9: 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiswanto, F. E., Ain Hajawiyah, and Yunindya Lazty Mahera. 2020. Factors influencing the weaknesses of internal control of local governments in Indonesia. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews 8: 122–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kompas.com. 2020. Catatan ICW, Kasus Korupsi Dana Desa Terbanyak Muncul Pada 2019. Available online: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/02/18/19084421/catatan-icw-kasus-korupsi-dana-desa-terbanyak-muncul-pada-2019 (accessed on 17 June 2021).
- Laksmi, Putu Santi Putri. 2020. Whistleblowing System, Competence, Morality, and Internal Control System Against Fraud Prevention on Village Financial Management in Denpasar I Ketut Sujana1 Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi 30: 2780–94. [Google Scholar]
- Lash, Nicholas A., and Bala Batavia. 2019. Corruption and doing business in emerging markets. Asian Economic and Financial Review 9: 1279–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lastanti, Hexana Sri. 2020. Role of Audit Committee in the Fraud Pentagon and Financial Statement Fraud. International Journal of Contemporary Accounting 2: 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Jau-Yang. 2018. An internal control system that includes corporate social responsibility for social sustainability in the new era. Sustainability 10: 3382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mardjono, Enny Susilowati, Yahn-Shir Chen, and Li-Jen He. 2020. Earning management and the effect characteristics of audit committee, independent commissioners: Evidence from indonesia. International Journal of Business and Society 21: 569–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muslih, Mochamad, and Haryono Umar. 2020. The Role of Ethics and Religion To Reduce the Corruption Level in Indonesia, Moderated By the Government Internal Control System. International Journal of Science and Society 2: 2020. Available online: http://ijsoc.goacademica.com (accessed on 27 June 2021).
- Monteiro, Albertina Paula, Joana Vale, Amélia Silva, and Cláudia Pereira. 2021. Impact of the internal control and accounting systems on the financial information usefulness: The role of the financial information quality. Academy of Strategic Management Journal 20: 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Myyry, Liisa. 2003. Components of Morality: A Professional Ethics Perspective on Moral Moativation, Moral Sensitivity, Moral Reasoning, and Related Constructs among University Students. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. [Google Scholar]
- Nichita, Anca, Larissa Batrancea, Ciprian Marcel Pop, Ioan Batrancea, Ioan Dan Morar, Ema Masca, Ana Maria Roux-Cesar, Denis Forte, Henrique Formigoni, and Adilson Aderito da Silv. 2019. We learn not for school but for life: Empirical evidence of the impact of tax literacy on tax compliance. Eastern European Economics 57: 397–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nichita, Ramona-Anca, and Larissa-Margareta Bătrâncea. 2012. The Implications Of Tax Morale On Tax Compliance Behavior. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series 21: 739–44. [Google Scholar]
- Nyide, Celani John, and Lawrence Mpela Lekhanya. 2016. Environmental management accounting (EMA) in the developing economy: A case of the hotel sector. Corporate Ownership and Control 13: 575–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pamungkas, Bambang, Cendy Avrian, and Reisya Ibtida. 2019. Factors influencing audit findings of the Indonesian district governments’ financial statements. Cogent Business and Management 6: 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pamungkas, Imang Dapit, Sugeng Wahyudi, and Tarmizi Achmad. 2020. Whistleblowing system and fraud early warning system on village fund fraud: The Indonesian experience. International Journal of Environmental Science. Available online: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=_BMTaskAAAAJ&pagesize=100&citation_for_view=_BMTaskAAAAJ:0EnyYjriUFMC (accessed on 29 June 2021).
- Petraşcu, Daniela, Mihai Adrian Bucur, and Elena Dobre. 2015. Analysing the Management of Human Resource in Economic-Financial Fraud Investigation. Procedia Economics and Finance 27: 209–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Purnamasari, Pupung, and Ima Amaliah. 2015. Fraud Prevention: Relevance to Religiosity and Spirituality in the Workplace. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 211: 827–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Purnomo, Yanuar Dwi, and Muhammad Khafid. 2017. Analysis of Factors Affecting the Tendency of Accounting Fraud with the Mediation of Ethical Behavior. Accounting Analysis Journal (AAJ) 6: 229–41. [Google Scholar]
- Putri, Anjung Pratama, and Winwin Yadiati. 2020. The Impact of Participative Leadership and Competencies on Performance of Village Fund Management. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Business 3: 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Putri, Predita Arie Ayu, and Soni Agus Irwandi. 2017. The determinants of accounting fraud tendency. The Indonesian Accounting Review 6: 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Putri, Yura Karlinda Wiasa, and I. Ketut Sujana. 2018. The influence of bid-ask spread and leverage on earnings management with good corporate governance as moderating variable. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences 5: 8–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahmatika, Dien Noviany, Maulida Dwi Kartikasari, Dewi Dewi Indriasih, Inayah Adi Sari, and Armya Mulia. 2019. Detection of Fraudulent Financial Statement; Can Perspective of Fraud Diamond Theory be applied to Property, Real Estate, and Building Construction Companies in Indonesia? European Journal of Business and Management Research 4: 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rijsenbilt, Antoinette. 2011. CEO Narcissism Measurement and Impact. Rotterdam: Erasmus Research Institute of Management—ERIM. [Google Scholar]
- Rukmana, Heru Satria. 2018. Pentagon Fraud Affect on Financial Statement Fraud and Firm Valu. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business 16: 118–22. [Google Scholar]
- Sawaka K, I Gusti Ngurah Hiwa, and I Wayan Ramantha. 2020. Fraud pentagon theory in detecting financial perception of financial reporting with good corporate governance as moderator variable. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences 7: 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Setiabudhi, I. Ketut Rai, and I. Putu Rasmadi Arsha Putra. 2020. Surveillance Urgency to Prevent Village Fund Corruption. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 9: 464–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Setiawan, Santy. 2018. The Effect of Internal Control and Individual Morality on the Tendency of Accounting Fraud. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal 3: 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wahyudi, Sugeng, Tarmizi Achmad, and Imang Dapit Pamungkas. 2019. Whistleblowing System and Fraud Early Warning System on Village Fund Fraud: The Indonesian Experience. International Journal of Financial Research 10: 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wahyudi, Sugeng, Tarmizi Achmad, and Imang Dapit Pamungkas. 2021. Village apparatus competence, individual morality, internal control system and whistleblowing system on village fund fraud. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Developmen 17: 672–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Zhi, Mei-Hui Chen, Chen Lung Chin, and Qi Zheng. 2017. Managerial ability, political connections, and fraudulent financial reporting in China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 36: 141–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Widigdo, Idie. 2013. Effect of Corporate Social Performance, Intellectual Capital, Ownership Structure, and Corporate Governace on Corporate Performace And Firm Value (Studies on Companies listed in the SRI-KEHATI Index). International Journal of Business Economics and Law 2: 302–34. [Google Scholar]
- Wolfe, David T., and Dana R. Hermanson. 2004. The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. CPA Journal 74: 38–42. [Google Scholar]
- Yusrianti, Hasni, Imam Ghozali, and Etna N. Yuyetta. 2020. Asset misappropriation tendency: Rationalization, financial pressure, and the role of opportunity (study in indonesian government sector). Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews 8: 373–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
No. | Variable | Definition | Indicator |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Internal Control System (X1) (Putri and Irwandi 2017) | The internal control system is an integral process of continuously carrying out actions and activities to provide adequate confidence in achieving organizational goals. |
|
2 | Appropriate Compensation (X2) (Purnomo and Khafid 2017) | The financial reward system (wages payment) is designed to attract, retain, and encourage employees to work productively. |
|
3 | Village Apparatus Competence (X3) (Atmadja et al. 2018) | An apparatus’s capabilities are in the form of personality foundation, workability, knowledge, skills, attitudes, behavior, and an understanding of the rules of social life needed in carrying out their duties. |
|
4 | Village Fund Fraud Prevention (Y) (Atmadja et al. 2019) | Prevention of village fund fraud is an effort to eliminate the causes of the fraud. |
|
5 | Moral Sensitivity (Z) (Myyry 2003) | Morality refers to personal or cultural values, codes of ethics, or social customs that distinguish between right and wrong, so that character in an apparatus plays an essential role as a holder of a commitment to the governance and development by the constitution, in favor of the interests of the people, in a manner that is transparent, accountable, and not corrupt. |
|
No | District Name | Number of Villages | Number of Questionnaires |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Questionnaire Distribution | 16 | 320 |
2 | Query Not Returned | 16 | 23 |
3 | Returning Questionnaire | 16 | 297 |
4 | Broken Questionnaire | 16 | 8 |
5 | Processable Questionnaire | 16 | 289 |
Variable | N | Min | Max | Mean | Std. Deviation | Skewness | Kurtosis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Internal Control System | 289 | 3.77 | 5.00 | 4.34 | 0.432 | 0.331 | 0.637 |
Appropriate Compensation | 289 | 3.54 | 4.80 | 4.21 | 0.349 | 0.044 | 0.076 |
Competency of Village Apparatus | 289 | 3.65 | 4.65 | 4.23 | 0.323 | 0.184 | 0.303 |
Village Fund Fraud | 289 | 3.78 | 5.00 | 4.47 | 0.336 | 0.226 | 0.438 |
Moral Sensitivity | 289 | 3.40 | 4.58 | 4.12 | 0.343 | 0.443 | 0.871 |
Internal Control System | Appropriate Compensation | Competency of Village Apparatus | Village Fund Fraud | Moral Sensitivity | Moral Sensitivity × Village Fund Fraud | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Internal Control System | 0.813 | −0.631 | −0.423 | 0.348 | −0.381 | −0.017 |
Appropriate Compensation | −0.631 | 0.845 | 0.466 | −0.573 | 0.517 | −0.067 |
Competency of Village Apparatus | −0.423 | 0.466 | 0.833 | −0.486 | 0.506 | −0.083 |
Village Fund Fraud | 0.348 | −0.573 | −0.486 | 0.805 | −0.476 | 0.142 |
Moral Sensitivity | −0.381 | 0.517 | 0.506 | −0.476 | 0.741 | −0.101 |
Village Fund Fraud × Moral Sensitivity | −0.017 | −0.067 | −0.083 | 0.142 | −0.101 | 0.518 |
Internal Control System | Appropriate Compensation | Competency | Village Fund Fraud | Moral Sensitivity | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R-squared | 0.579 | 0.898 | |||
Adj. R-Squared | 0.343 | 0.545 | |||
Composite Reliab. | 0.831 | 0.847 | 0.897 | 0.786 | 0.548 |
Cronbach’s alpha | 0.735 | 0.796 | 0.847 | 0.842 | 0.436 |
Avg. Var. Extrac. | 0.495 | 0.457 | 0.438 | 0.555 | 0.312 |
Full collim.VIF | 1.546 | 1.514 | 1.486 | 1.456 | 1.443 |
Q-squared | 0.165 |
Model Fit and Quality Indices | Index | Criteria | Result |
---|---|---|---|
Average Path Coefficient (APC) | 0.095 | p < 0.05 | Fit Model |
Average R-Squared (ARS) | 0.132 | p < 0.05 | Fit Model |
Average Adjusted R-Squared | 0.104 | p < 0.05 | Fit Model |
Average Block Variance Inflation Factor (AVIF) | 1.339 | ≤5 and ideally 3.3 | Fit Model |
Average Full Collinearity VIF (AFVIF) | 1.478 | ≤5 and ideally 3.3 | Fit Model |
Tenenhaus GoF (GoF) | 0.218 | small ≥ 0.1, medium ≥ 0.25, large ≥ 0.36 | Fit Model |
Simpson’s Paradox Ratio (SPR) | 1.465 | ≥0.7 and ideally = 1 | Fit Model |
R-Squared Contribution Ratio (RSCR | 0.963 | ≥0.9 and ideally = 1 | Fit Model |
Statistical Suppression Ratio (SSR) | 1.000 | ≥0.7 | Fit Model |
Nonlinear Bivariate Causality Direction Ratio (NLBCDR) | 1.000 | ≥0.7 | Fit Model |
Correlation | Path Coefficients | p-Value | Information |
---|---|---|---|
Internal Control System → Village Fund Fraud | 0.111 | 0.07 | Accepted |
Appropriate Compensation → Village Fund Fraud | 0.216 | 0.03 | Accepted |
Competency → Village Fund Fraud | 0.060 | 0.08 | Accepted |
Correlation | Path Coefficients | p-Value | Information |
---|---|---|---|
Moral Sensitivity × Internal Control System → Village Fund Fraud | 0.118 | 0.05 | Accepted |
Moral Sensitivity × Internal Control System → Village Fund Fraud | 0.279 | 0.04 | Accepted |
Moral Sensitivity × Competency → Village Fund Fraud | 0.087 | 0.01 | Accepted |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wahyudi, S.; Achmad, T.; Pamungkas, I.D. Prevention Village Fund Fraud in Indonesia: Moral Sensitivity as a Moderating Variable. Economies 2022, 10, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10010026
Wahyudi S, Achmad T, Pamungkas ID. Prevention Village Fund Fraud in Indonesia: Moral Sensitivity as a Moderating Variable. Economies. 2022; 10(1):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10010026
Chicago/Turabian StyleWahyudi, Sugeng, Tarmizi Achmad, and Imang Dapit Pamungkas. 2022. "Prevention Village Fund Fraud in Indonesia: Moral Sensitivity as a Moderating Variable" Economies 10, no. 1: 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10010026
APA StyleWahyudi, S., Achmad, T., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2022). Prevention Village Fund Fraud in Indonesia: Moral Sensitivity as a Moderating Variable. Economies, 10(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10010026