1. Introduction
In the last two decades, the number of online university courses available worldwide has risen consistently, as well as the number of students and academic staff involved in this new way of implementing higher education. This spread was driven both by social (increasing number of working or disabled students) and technological (virtual learning environments, broadband communications, etc.) changes.
Online collaboration, communities and courses were enabled thanks to Web 2.0 and social media, including the first massive open online course (MOOC) in 2008 [
1,
2]. In the 2010s, e-Learning became mature, in particular in enterprises and their vocational training. However, the focus was often on the technology and on the simple transfer of face-to-face learning and paper-based materials into digital environments. Thus, innovative methodologies and specific pedagogical approaches in online learning were demanded under the umbrella term of “Open Education” that was influencing policies, methodologies and practices [
2,
3]. As a consequence, open online learning approaches entered official curricula in schools and higher education institutions [
3].
However, this growing interest for online higher education required standardization and distance quality assessment procedures, which led online higher education to become a critical aspect in many academic organizations, especially if one considers the framework of the Bologna Process and its progressive deployment that led to the European Higher Education Area initiative.
The COVID-19 pandemic began in 2020 and is still affecting the whole world in a way that neither globalization nor the establishment of the worldwide Internet were able to achieve over several decades. The pandemic impacted all sectors, branches and levels of society, including formal higher education and the involved academic institutions [
4,
5,
6,
7]. COVID-19’s impact was unique in many aspects and led to many ad hoc decisions and changes: most educators and learning providers were not prepared and forced to move to distance education without specific comprehension of the online education phenomenon. e-Learning was considered as a potential solution, but many of the involved parties (students, instructors, learning providers, educational systems and ministries) were lacking proper expertise, infrastructure and equipment.
In the framework of e-Learning, in November 2018 the Higher Education Learning Methodologies and Technologies Online (HELMeTO) task force was created. The task force promotes a multidisciplinary platform for cross-fertilization of knowledge and for sharing research experience in the fields of methodologies and technologies for distance learning. The task force organized the First International HELMeTO Workshop (
http://sites.google.com/view/helmeto2019/homepage accessed on 1 July 2021) that was held in Novedrate, Como, Italy in June 2019, at the headquarters of the eCampus Online University. More than 50 researchers and experts participated in the event, wherein 30 scientific contributions were presented. A collection of selected and extended contributions has been published in [
8] as chapters of a Springer volume of the Communications in Computer and Information Science (CCIS) book series.
Despite the complex and rapidly evolving scenario due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the HELMeTO task force felt the need to carry on in organizing a second edition of the Workshop. The event was organized by the University of Bari (Italy) and was successfully held fully online in September 2020. The theme of HELMeTO 2020 (
http://www.helmeto2020bari.com accessed on 1 July 2021) was “Bridges and Mediation in Higher Distance Education”. HELMeTO 2020 mainly focused on discussing novel online learning delivery solutions for all the higher education institutions rather than for online universities only. With the present paper, we share with the scientific community a report on the outcomes of HELMeTO 2020.
HELMeTO 2020 became a moment for sharing and discussing the key issues for online higher education for both the present situation and the near future. The event was characterized by two main scientific streams, namely “Methodologies for e-Learning” and “Information Technologies for e-Learning”. Additionally, a cross-track on “Facing the COVID-19 Emergency in Higher Education Teaching and Learning” was also arranged.
Some of the main topics tackled by the workshop were didactic models for e-Learning, technological solutions for distance learning, educational data analysis and online evaluation methods. Most of these topics were widely discussed informally within the academic community and are recurrent conference topics, but the time has come for establishing a specific recurrent event dedicated to online higher education, especially in the European area.
The interest in the event was confirmed by the eCampus University (Italy), SIREM Scientific Society and Springer that provided their scientific support to the event. Moreover, other internationally recognized online universities, namely Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR) (Spain), UNITELMA Sapienza (Italy), the European Institute for Learning, Innovation and Cooperation (Germany), and “Giustino Fortunato” University (Italy), were involved in the event’s organization.
The International Technical Program Committee (TPC) of HELMeTO 2020 was composed of valuable and international researchers and professors from both online and traditional face-to-face universities. In particular, the TPC members came from nine different countries, namely Italy, Finland, Spain, the Netherlands, India, France, China, the USA and Morocco. The international academic community answered the HELMeTO 2020 [
9] call for papers with 59 high-quality proposals. Each proposal was reviewed by at least three members of the TPC who decided to accept 39 papers for oral presentation at the virtual workshop. Finally, a Springer post-proceedings book composed of 26 selected contributions has recently been published in [
9].
Moreover, three invited speakers of a high scientific profile, namely Sir John Daniel (Acsenda School of Management, Vancouver, Canada), Prof. Pierpaolo Limone (University of Foggia, Italy) and Prof. Svetlana Karkina (Federal University of Kazan, Russia) enriched the overall program of HELMeTO 2020, together with the first edition of the HELMeTo Award, promoted within the workshop by offering two prizes: one reserved for contributions related to the pedagogical–methodological area and one for contributions from the technological area.
The rest of this report is focused on reviewing the 26 contributions included as full or short papers in the post-proceedings of HELMeTO 2020 [
9]. In the first section, we summarize the contributions in the field of methodologies for e-Learning. Then, in the second section, we focus on the works dealing with technologies for e-Learning and, in the third section, we briefly discuss the papers collected and accepted for the special track about the COVID-19 emergency in higher education. Finally, the last section provides some final remarks and draws some conclusions and provides future perspectives.
2. Methodologies for e-Learning
Online higher education offers several topics for further study, both theoretical and empirical, in the specific context of the methodologies, assumed as the backbone of any educational intervention activity. Thus, HELMeTO 2020 accepted contributions under the umbrella of methodologies for e-Learning. We divided them into two main topics, namely “Online learning pedagogical frameworks: models, perspectives and application” and “Online learning strategies and resources: e-tutoring, communities, webinars and tools”.
2.1. Online Learning Pedagogical Frameworks: Models, Perspectives and Application
The work of Frisch et al. allows us to know the investigations of the Information, Innovation, Didactiques, Documentation, Education, Knowledge, Ingénierie (IDEKI) network, and proposes the construction of a “collective intelligence” to reflect on hybrid modes of online professional development. Through the description of two different professional communities, and specifically the analysis of their practices and the impact on the professional development of the actors, the work makes explicit the connection between research and some dimensions of real professional activity, crossing the writings on teaching and the fields of professionalization, construction of professionalism, accompaniment and professional development. The study carried out with the multiple-case approach, described by Panciroli et al., analyzes the blended model implemented in a university course and two undergraduate laboratories at the University of Bologna. It aimed to investigate how three specific teaching strategies (art-based learning, inverted learning and role play) support blended and online teaching by means of student-to-student and student-to-teacher engagement and interactions. Toto and Limone investigated through the the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) questionnaire the degree and forms of acceptance of technologies by teachers involved in online courses. They delve into the theme of teachers’ mental representations, perceptions and visions, regarding the use of digital technologies in the classroom and provided an innovative perspective on the use of digital technologies in the school context. The work of Piccino investigates the forms of reasoning that can be developed in students in an online environment, both real and virtual, through narrative and paradigmatic thinking. It explores the representations of students, as linked to cognitive styles, which orient personal dispositions towards one or the other modality of organization of teaching, and identifies the variables that students take as a point of reference to establish the personal meaning attributed to the experiences of learning in person and at a distance.
4. Facing the COVID-19 Emergency in Higher Education Teaching and Learning
The COVID-19 pandemic has heavily impacted the world of higher education. If online universities were somehow prepared for this unfortunate situation, although the challenge is still apparent for blended courses characterized by face-to-face practice-oriented activities, traditional universities paid the highest price in seeing themselves basically converging towards distance learning in a short time. On the other hand, the pandemic emergency has clearly boosted theories and practices of distance learning in higher education. HELMeTO 2020 launched a call for papers reserved for a COVID-19 special track, and the impressive amount of papers received for this special track proves both the successful effort made by traditional courses in turning online and the response of the higher educational research community in defining frameworks and models for distance learning during the pandemic. The COVID-19 special track relied on many submissions that were carefully selected and turned into two topics. The first topic pooled contributions focused on tools and practices for facing the COVID-19 emergency in higher education, while the second topic gathered studies aimed at providing frameworks and overviews.
4.2. Facing the COVID-19 Emergency: Frameworks and Overviews
Concerning the second COVID-19-related topic, Bruschi et al. discuss the early results of a study on the advantages experienced by university teachers, already involved in a specific training program on the online open course model at the University of Turin, facing the COVID-19 emergency. Hana Ait Si Ahmad et al. present a study on the implementation of online teaching at Cadi Ayyad University, Morocco, as a starting point for a strategic plan for the digital transformation of the university after the COVID-19 emergency, highlighting six pillars that seem to be the most relevant to build the university of tomorrow. Fabbri et al. describe the implementation of a blended learning model in the Department of Education, Humanities and Intercultural Communication at the University of Siena (Italy). The crisis is seen as a “critical organizational incident”, which triggered a process of building a new community, more reflective and able to evaluate and rethink the degree of effectiveness of its pedagogical practices. Loredana Perla et al. present an investigation aimed at identifying the main constituents of the imposed digital “metamorphosis” and the forms and formats of the hybridization introduced in educational mediation during the COVID-19 crisis. They identify some indications of a profound rethinking of university didactic mediation in a hybrid digital direction that seem to be here to stay even after the return to the normality of face-to-face teaching.