Next Article in Journal
Solution of an Electrodynamic Problem for a Homogeneous Equivalent Segment of a Coaxial Load, Considering Heat Losses in the Conductors
Next Article in Special Issue
The Numerical Solution of the External Dirichlet Generalized Harmonic Problem for a Sphere by the Method of Probabilistic Solution
Previous Article in Journal
Perceptron: Learning, Generalization, Model Selection, Fault Tolerance, and Role in the Deep Learning Era
Previous Article in Special Issue
On the Numerical Solution of 1D and 2D KdV Equations Using Variational Homotopy Perturbation and Finite Difference Methods
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Cakir, M.; Gunes, B. A Fitted Operator Finite Difference Approximation for Singularly Perturbed Volterra-Fredholm Integro-Differential Equations. Mathematics 2022, 10, 3560

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van 65080, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Mathematics 2022, 10(24), 4731; https://doi.org/10.3390/math10244731
Submission received: 18 November 2022 / Accepted: 30 November 2022 / Published: 13 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Numerical Methods and Applications for Differential Problems)
The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [1]:
1. In the fifth paragraph of the Introduction Section, the sentence “In [35], using composite trapzeoidal rule, fitted mesh finite difference schemes have been established on Shishkin type mesh” should be “In [35], using composite trapezoidal rule, fitted mesh finite difference schemes have been established on Shishkin type mesh”.
2. In Section 2, (1) At the end of the Proof of Lemma 1, “Therefore, the proof of the lemma is complete” should be “Therefore, the proof of the lemma is completed”; (2) In the Proof of Lemma 1, the following reference is used to prove the relation (5): “Amiraliyev, G.M.; Durmaz, M.E.; Kudu, M. A numerical method for a second order singularly perturbed Fredholm integro-differential equation. Miskolc Math. Notes 2021, 22, 37–48.”
Therefore, this reference should be added to the “References” section, and it should be cited after the sentence “which hints at the proof of the relation (5)” at the end of the Proof of Lemma 1.
3. In Section 4, (1) In the expression of Lemma 2,
c 0 = 1 1 | λ | ( max 1 i N j = 1 i j | K 1 , i j | + max 1 i N j = 1 N j | K 2 , i j | )
should be changed to
c 0 = α 1 1 α 1 | λ | ( max 1 i N j = 1 i j | K 1 , i j | + max 1 i N j = 1 N j | K 2 , i j | )
(2) In the Proof of Lemma 2,
| z i | α 1 max 1 i N | R i | + α 1 max 1 i N j = 1 i j | K 1 , i j | | z j | + α 1 | λ | max 1 i N j = 1 N j | K 2 , i j | | z j |
should be
| z i | α 1 max 1 i N | R i | + α 1 | λ | max 1 i N j = 1 i j | K 1 , i j | | z j | + α 1 | λ | max 1 i N j = 1 N j | K 2 , i j | | z j |
(3) In the Proof of Lemma 2,
z α 1 R + α 1 max 1 i N j = 1 i j | K 1 , i j | z + α 1 | λ | max 1 i N j = 1 N j | K 2 , i j | z
should be
z α 1 R + α 1 | λ | max 1 i N j = 1 i j | K 1 , i j | z + α 1 | λ | max 1 i N j = 1 N j | K 2 , i j | z
4. In Section 5, (1) In Example 1,
ε 2 u + u + 0 x u ( t ) d t + 0 1 u ( t ) d t = ε ( e x ε + e 1 ε + 2 ) ,   x ( 0 , 1 )
should be
ε 2 u + u + 0 x u ( t ) d t + 0 1 u ( t ) d t = ε ( e x ε + e 1 ε 2 ) ,   x ( 0 , 1 )
(2) In Example 3,
u ( 0 ) = 0 ,   u ( 1 ) = e 1 ε + 1 ε
should be
u ( 0 ) = 0 ,   u ( 1 ) = e 1 ε + 1
5. In the References Section, the following reference should be added after the Ref. 41 to the “References” section:
“Amiraliyev, G.M.; Durmaz, M.E.; Kudu, M. A numerical method for a second order singularly perturbed Fredholm integro-differential equation. Miskolc Math. Notes 2021, 22, 37–48.”
With this correction, the order of some references has been adjusted accordingly.
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original article has been updated.

Reference

  1. Cakir, M.; Gunes, B. A fitted operator finite difference approximation for singularly perturbed Volterra-Fredholm integro-differential equations. Mathematics 2022, 10, 3560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cakir, M.; Gunes, B. Correction: Cakir, M.; Gunes, B. A Fitted Operator Finite Difference Approximation for Singularly Perturbed Volterra-Fredholm Integro-Differential Equations. Mathematics 2022, 10, 3560. Mathematics 2022, 10, 4731. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10244731

AMA Style

Cakir M, Gunes B. Correction: Cakir, M.; Gunes, B. A Fitted Operator Finite Difference Approximation for Singularly Perturbed Volterra-Fredholm Integro-Differential Equations. Mathematics 2022, 10, 3560. Mathematics. 2022; 10(24):4731. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10244731

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cakir, Musa, and Baransel Gunes. 2022. "Correction: Cakir, M.; Gunes, B. A Fitted Operator Finite Difference Approximation for Singularly Perturbed Volterra-Fredholm Integro-Differential Equations. Mathematics 2022, 10, 3560" Mathematics 10, no. 24: 4731. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10244731

APA Style

Cakir, M., & Gunes, B. (2022). Correction: Cakir, M.; Gunes, B. A Fitted Operator Finite Difference Approximation for Singularly Perturbed Volterra-Fredholm Integro-Differential Equations. Mathematics 2022, 10, 3560. Mathematics, 10(24), 4731. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10244731

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop