1. Introduction
The well-known Jensen inequality [
1] states that if
is a convex mapping defined on the linear space
X and
,
,
,
, then
The Hermite–Hadamard inequality gives us an estimate of the (integral) mean value of a continuous convex function as follows.
If
is a convex function, then
If f is concave, then above inequalities are reversed.
Over the last decades, these inequalities have been investigated in many papers and monographs, since they are very useful in approximation theory, optimization theory, information theory and numerical analysis (see [
2] and the references cited therein).
Combining a special case of the integral Jensen inequality and a special case of the integral Lah–Ribarič inequality, the following weighted Hermite–Hadamard inequality is established (see [
1], p. 145).
Theorem 1. Let be a non-negative function. If f is a convex function given on an interval I, then we haveorwhere In [
3,
4], the authors proved some weighted versions of the general integral identities using harmonic sequences of polynomials and
w-harmonic sequences of functions. In order to introduce one of these identities, we consider the subdivision
of the segment
,
. If
is an arbitrary integrable function, then for each segment
,
, we define
w-harmonic sequences of functions
by
and the function
by
An approximation of an integral
via
w-harmonic sequences of functions is given in the general integral identity proved in the following theorem (see [
3]).
Theorem 2. If is such that is piecewise continuous on , then the following identity holds: The following Hermite–Hadamard-type inequality is obtained in [
5] using identity (
4).
Theorem 3. Suppose is an arbitrary integrable function, and w-harmonic sequences of functions are defined by (2). Let the function , defined by (3), be non-negative. Then, - (a)
if is an -convex function, the following inequalities holdwhereand - (b)
if g is an -concave function, then (5) holds with the sign of inequalities reversed.
If
w-harmonic sequences of functions
are expanded by
, such that
for
, the function
becomes
and the following result is obtained ([
5]).
Theorem 4. Assume is an -convex function. Suppose is an arbitrary integrable function and are w-harmonic sequences of functions. Let the function , defined by (8), be non-negative. Then, inequality (5) is valid forand If or g is an -concave function, then (5) holds with the sign of inequalities reversed. 2. Two-Point Formula
Now, we use the weighted version of the integral identity given in Theorem 2 and the inequalities from Theorems 3 and 4 to establish Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities for the weighted two-point formula.
We observe the function
, the integrable function
and the
w-harmonic sequences of functions
on
, where
. We consider the subdivision
of the segment
, and we assume
and
, for
. In [
4,
6] the authors proved the following theorem.
Theorem 5. Let be an integrable function and , and let be a sequence of polynomials such that , and . Suppose are w-harmonic sequences of functions on , for and some , defined by the following relations:for . If is such that is piecewise continuous on , then we havewhere for andsuch that Remark 1. The polynomials satisfyand hence the polynomial is uniquely determined by the values , for From Theorems 1 and 3, the properties of
n-convex functions and the properties of
w-harmonic sequences of functions, we now obtain new Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities for the weighted two-point quadrature Formula (
9).
Theorem 6. Let be an integrable function and be fixed. Suppose are w-harmonic sequences of functions on , for and , as defined in Theorem 5. Let the function , defined by (12), be non-negative. If is an -convex function, thenwhereand and are defined as in Theorem 5. If or g is -concave, then (13) holds with the sign of inequalities reversed. Proof. As
g is an
-convex function, then
is convex and inequalities (
13) follow directly from Theorem 1, replacing the non-negative function
p with the non-negative function
and the convex function
f with the convex function
, and then applying the identity (
9) on
. Further, using identity (
6) from Theorem 3 for
,
and
, we obtain
Since,
and
, for
, we obtain
Applying the definitions of
from Theorem 5, we derive
and
Now, according to the definitions of
and
given by (
10) and (
11), respectively, we obtain
Similarly, using identity (
7) from Theorem 3 for
,
and
, the definitions of
from Theorem 5 and the definitions of
and
given by (
10) and (
11), we can calculate
.
□
We continue now by expanding the
w-harmonic sequences of functions
with
, such that
for
, so that function
is equal to
For the new subdivision of the segment and the values and , for , we obtain the following results.
Theorem 7. Suppose is an integrable function and is fixed. Suppose are w-harmonic sequences of functions on , and . Let the function , defined by (14), be non-negative. If is an -convex function, then inequalities (13) are valid forand If or g is -concave, then (13) holds with the sign of inequalities reversed. Proof. Applying Theorem 4 for , , , and , for , and the definitions of from Theorem 5, we obtain values of and . □
Using the integral mean value theorem for
, where
is such that
is a continuous function, the authors in [
3] proved that there exists an
such that
Applying this integral identity to our result in inequalities (
13), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 8. Assume satisfies the conditions of Theorem 7 for . Let and be defined as in (10) and (11). Let be a continuous function on , and letfor some . If is such that is a continuous function, then there exists an such thatwhereand Proof. Inequality (
16) follows directly from (
13), replacing its middle term by
according to the integral identity (
15), and then applying (
10) and (
11) to
and
, respectively. □
The coefficients
and
defined with (
10) and (
11) are not symmetric. If we assume
, for
, and
then we obtain
.
To obtain the maximum degree of exactness of the quadrature formula in Equation (
9) for fixed
, we choose the sequence of polynomials
which is, according to Remark 1, uniquely determined by the formula
Hence, we have and for .
Finally, from identity (
9) for
, we obtain the following two-point weighted integral formula:
where
Now, applying the results from Theorems 6 and 7 to identity (
19), we obtain the following corollaries.
Corollary 1. Let be an integrable function such that for each , and let equality (17) hold. Suppose are w-harmonic sequences of functions on , for and , as defined in Theorem 5, and let be defined by (18). Let the function , defined by (12), be non-negative and let . If is an -convex function, thenwhereandand is defined as in Theorem 5. If or g is -concave, then (13) holds with the sign of inequalities reversed. Proof. The proof follows from Theorem 6 for the special choice of the polynomials . □
Corollary 2. Let be an integrable function such that for each , and let equality (17) hold. Suppose are w-harmonic sequences of functions on , for and , as defined in Theorem 5, and let be defined by (18). Let the function , defined by (14), be non-negative and let . If is a -convex function, thenwhere If g is a -concave function, then (20) holds with the sign of inequalities reversed. Proof. The proof follows from Theorem 7 for the special choice of the polynomials . □
3. Applications
Considering some special cases of the function w, we here obtain new bounds for the Gauss–Legendre two-point quadrature formula and for the Gauss–Chebyshev two-point quadrature formulas of the first and second kind.
3.1. Gauss–Legendre Two-Point Quadrature Formula
Suppose that
,
and
. Now, from Theorem 5, we calculate
and for
and
In order to provide the non-negativity of , we will replace n, in the definition of , by .
Corollary 3. Letfor . If is a -convex function, thenwhereand If g is -concave, then (22) holds with the sign of inequalities reversed. Proof. Inequality (
22) follows from Theorem 6 if
and
is the non-negative function given in (
21). □
Corollary 4. Letfor If is a -convex function, then inequalities (22) hold forand If g is -concave, then (22) holds with the sign of inequalities reversed. Proof. The obtained results follow from Theorem 7 if
and
is the non-negative function defined in (
21). □
If the polynomials
are as follows:
we have
and
for
, and hence we obtain the non-weighted two-point quadrature formulas with a maximum degree of exactness
where
Specifically, for , the generalization of the Legendre–Gauss two-point formula follows. Now, we derive Hermite–Hadamard-type estimates for this generalization of the Legendre–Gauss two-point formula.
If the assumptions of Corollary (1) hold, for
and
and if
is a
-convex function, we derive
where
In the special case of
, we obtain
If the assumptions of Corollary (2) hold, for
and
and if
g is a
-convex function for
, we obtain
In the special case of
, we obtain
3.2. Gauss–Chebyshev Two-Point Quadrature Formula of the First Kind
Suppose that
,
and
. Now, from Theorem 5, we calculate
and
In what follows,
B denotes the beta function, defined by
and
is the hypergeometric function with
,
.
Corollary 5. Let , for all and for . If is a -convex function, thenwhereand If g is a -concave function, then (24) holds with the sign of inequalities reversed. Proof. The obtained results follow from Theorem 6 for
,
and the non-negative function
, defined by (
23). □
Corollary 6. Let , for all and for . If is a -convex function, then (24) holds forand If g is a -concave function, then (24) holds with the sign of inequalities reversed. Proof. These results are a special case of Theorem 7 for
,
and the non-negative function
, defined by (
23). □
If we assume that the polynomials
are such that
we have
and
for
, and hence we obtain
where
Specifically, for , we obtain the generalization of the Gauss–Chebyshev two-point quadrature formula of the first kind. Now, we obtain Hermite–Hadamard-type estimates for the Gauss–Chebyshev two-point quadrature formula of the first kind.
Applying Corollary (1) for
,
,
and a 6-convex function
g, we obtain
Further, if the assumptions of Corollary (2) hold, for
,
and a
-convex function
g we obtain
where
In the special case of
, we obtain
where
3.3. Gauss–Chebyshev Two-Point Quadrature Formula of the Second Kind
Let us assume that
,
and
. Now, from Theorem 5, we calculate
and
Corollary 7. Let , for all and for . If is a -convex function, thenwhereand If g is -concave, then (26) holds with the sign of inequalities reversed. Proof. This is a special case of Theorem 6 for
,
and the non-negative function
, defined by (
25). □
Corollary 8. Let , for all and for . If is a -convex function, then (26) holds forand If g is -concave, then (26) holds with the sign of inequalities reversed. Proof. This is a special case of Theorem 7 for
,
and the non-negative function
, defined by (
25). □
If we assume that the polynomials
are such that
we have
and
for
, and hence we obtain
where
Specifically, for , the generalization of the Gauss–Chebyshev two-point quadrature formula of the second kind follows. Now, we derive Hermite–Hadamard-type estimates for the Gauss–Chebyshev two-point quadrature formula of the second kind.
If the assumptions of Corollary (2) hold, for
,
and the
-convex function
g we obtain
where
In the special case of
, we obtain
where