Next Article in Journal
Generative Transformer with Knowledge-Guided Decoding for Academic Knowledge Graph Completion
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis on Controllability Results for Impulsive Neutral Hilfer Fractional Differential Equations with Nonlocal Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Some Quantum Integral Inequalities for (p, h)-Convex Functions

by
Jirawat Kantalo
1,
Fongchan Wannalookkhee
2,
Kamsing Nonlaopon
2,* and
Hüseyin Budak
3
1
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University, Sakon Nakhon 47000, Thailand
2
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
3
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Arts, Düzce University, Düzce 81620, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2023, 11(5), 1072; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11051072
Submission received: 19 January 2023 / Revised: 8 February 2023 / Accepted: 9 February 2023 / Published: 21 February 2023

Abstract

:
In this paper, we derive an identity of the q-definite integral of a continuous function f on a finite interval. We then use such identity to prove some new quantum integral inequalities for ( p , h ) -convex function. The results obtained in this paper generalize previous work in the literature.

1. Introduction

Quantum calculus (it can be called q-calculus for short) is known as the study of calculus with no limits. Basically, if we take limit q tends to 1, then q-calculus can be reduced to ordinary calculus. It has been first studied by Euler (1707–1783). In 1910, F. H. Jackson [1] determined the definite q-integral known as the q-Jackson integral. Quantum calculus has many applications in several mathematical areas, such as combinatorics, number theory, orthogonal polynomials, basic hypergeometric functions, mechanics, quantum theory, and the theory of relativity (see, for instance, [2,3,4,5,6,7] and the references therein). The book by V. Kac and P. Cheung [8] covers the fundamental knowledge and basic theoretical concepts of quantum calculus.
Later, in 2013, J. Tariboon and S. K. Ntouyas [9,10] defined the q-derivative and q-integral of a continuous function on finite intervals and proved some of its properties. These definitions are called q a -calculus. Many well-known integral inequalities such as Hermite–Hadamard, Hölder, trapezoid, Ostrowski, Cauchy–Bunyakovsky–Schwarz, Grüss, and Grüss–Čebyšev inequalities have been studied in the concept of q a -calculus.
In 2020, S. Bermudo et al. [11] newly defined the q-derivative and q-integral of a continuous function on finite intervals, which is called q b -calculus. Moreover, their paper proved Hermite–Hadamard inequalities for convex functions and h-convex functions by using such a new definition. Based on the definitions of q a -and q b -calculus, there are many outcomes concerning quantum calculus.
The Hermite–Hadamard inequality is a classical inequality stated as: If f : [ a , b ] R is a convex function, then
f a + b 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 .
Inequality (1) was introduced by C. Hermite [12] in 1883 and was investigated by J. Hadamard [13] in 1893.
Recently, there have been many works about quantum integral inequalities, especially quantum Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities. Interested readers can see [14,15,16,17,18,19] and the references therein.
Moreover, in 2014, Z. B. Fang and R. Shi [20] defined a new class of functions which is called ( p , h ) -convex functions, and also proved some integral inequalities of ( p , h ) -convex functions. Motivated by the above literature, we propose to establish some new quantum Hermite–Hadamard inequalities for ( p , h ) -convex function, which is a generalization of the results of [20].
Inspired by the ongoing studies, we aim to prove Hermite–Hadamard inequalities for ( p , h ) -convex functions via q-calculus. We also show the validity of newly established inequalities with examples for particular choices of q ( 0 , 1 ) .
The structure of this paper is as follows: the fundamentals of ( p , h ) -convex functions and q-calculus are briefly discussed in Section 2. In Section 3, we establish q-integral inequalities for ( p , h ) -convex functions. We present some examples in Section 4 to illustrate the newly established inequalities. Finally, we conclude our work in Section 5.

2. Preliminaries

Throughout this paper, we let I = [ a , b ] R be the finite interval with 0 a < b , h : ( 0 , 1 ) R be a positive function, p be a real number and 0 < q < 1 be a constant. The definitions of ( p , h ) -convex function, q-derivative and q-integral are given in [9,11,20].
Definition 1
([20]). A function f : I R is said to be ( p , h ) -convex function, if f is non-negative and
f [ t x p + ( 1 + t ) y p ] 1 p h ( t ) f ( x ) + h ( 1 t ) f ( y )
for all x , y I and t ( 0 , 1 ) .
Example 1.
Define a function f : [ 0 , 1 ] R by f ( x ) = x p , where p is an odd natural number and h ( t ) = t 1 2 for 0 < t < 1 . We have f is ( p , h ) -convex because
f t x p + ( 1 t ) y p 1 p = t x p + ( 1 t ) y p = t f ( x ) + ( 1 t ) f ( y ) t 1 2 f ( x ) + ( 1 t ) 1 2 f ( y ) = h ( t ) f ( x ) + h ( 1 t ) f ( y )
for all x , y [ 0 , 1 ] and 0 < t < 1 .
Example 2.
Define a function f : [ 0 , 1 ] R by f ( x ) = 1 , p R \ { 0 } and h ( t ) = t for 0 < t < 1 . We have f is ( p , h ) -convex because
f t x p + ( 1 t ) y p 1 p = 1 = t + ( 1 t ) = t f ( x ) + ( 1 t ) f ( y ) = h ( t ) f ( x ) + h ( 1 t ) f ( y )
for all x , y [ 0 , 1 ] and 0 < t < 1 .
Definition 2
([9]). Let f : [ a , b ] R be a continuous function. Then the q a -derivative of f at x ( a , b ] is defined by
a D q f ( x ) = f x f q x + ( 1 q ) a ( 1 q ) ( x a ) .
The q a -integral is defined by
a x f ( t ) a d q t = ( 1 q ) ( x a ) n = 0 q n f q n x + 1 q n a .
Note that, in the case of a = 0 , we write D q f ( x ) : = 0 D q f ( x ) and 0 x f ( t ) d q t : = 0 x f ( t ) 0 d q t .
Definition 3
([11]). Let f : [ a , b ] R be a continuous function. Then the q b -derivative of f at x [ a , b ) is defined by
b D q f ( x ) = f q x + ( 1 q ) b f x ( 1 q ) ( b x ) .
The q b -integral is defined by
x b f ( t ) b d q t = ( 1 q ) ( b x ) n = 0 q n f q n x + 1 q n b .

3. Main Results

In this section, we shall start with the following key lemma, which is used to derive the main theorems. Then we prove a variant of quantum integral inequalities for ( p , h ) -convex functions.
Lemma 1.
Let f : I R be a q b p -integrable function. The q b p -integral of f on [ a , b ] is defined by the expression
1 ( b p a p ) a p b p f ( x 1 p ) b p d q x = 0 1 f t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p d q t .
Proof. 
By the definition of q b p -integral, we directly have
a p b p f ( x 1 p ) b p d q x = ( 1 q ) ( b p a p ) n = 0 q n f q n a p + ( 1 q n ) b p 1 p = ( b p a p ) 0 1 f t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p d q t .
The proof is completed. □
Similarly,
1 ( b p a p ) a p b p f ( x 1 p ) a p d q x = 0 1 f t b p + ( 1 t ) a p 1 p d q t .
Theorem 1.
Let f : [ a , b ] R be ( p , h ) -convex and q-integrable function. Then, we have
1 h 1 2 f a p + b p 2 1 p 1 ( b p a p ) a p b p f ( x 1 p ) a p d q x + a p b p f ( x 1 p ) b p d q x f ( a ) + f ( b ) 0 1 h ( t ) d q t + 0 1 h ( 1 t ) d q t .
Proof. 
Since f is a ( p , h ) -convex function, we have
f x p + y p 2 1 p h 1 2 f ( x ) + f ( y ) ,
for any x , y [ a , b ] .
Setting x = t b p + ( 1 t ) a p 1 p and y = t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p . Then, we obtain
f a p + b p 2 1 p h 1 2 f t b p + ( 1 t ) a p 1 p + f t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p ,
that is
1 h 1 2 f a p + b p 2 1 p f t b p + ( 1 t ) a p 1 p + f t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p .
q-Integrating (6) over [ 0 , 1 ] and then using (3) and (4), we have
0 1 1 h 1 2 f a p + b p 2 1 p d q t 0 1 f t b p + ( 1 t ) a p 1 p d q t + 0 1 f t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p d q t = 1 ( b p a p ) a p b p f ( x 1 p ) a p d q x + a p b p f ( x 1 p ) b p d q x .
Moreover, since f is ( p , h ) -convex function, we get
f t b p + ( 1 t ) a p 1 p h ( t ) f ( b ) + h ( 1 t ) f ( a )
and
f t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p h ( t ) f ( a ) + h ( 1 t ) f ( b ) .
From (8) and (9), we get
f t b p + ( 1 t ) a p 1 p + f t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p h ( t ) f ( a ) + h ( 1 t ) f ( b ) + h ( t ) f ( b ) + h ( 1 t ) f ( a ) .
Furthermore, q-integrating (10) over [ 0 , 1 ] , we have
0 1 f t b p + ( 1 t ) a p 1 p d q t + 0 1 f t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p d q t 0 1 h ( t ) f ( a ) + h ( 1 t ) f ( b ) d q t + 0 1 h ( t ) f ( b ) + h ( 1 t ) f ( a ) d q t = f ( a ) 0 1 h ( t ) d q t + f ( b ) 0 1 h ( 1 t ) d q t + f ( b ) 0 1 h ( t ) d q t + f ( a ) 0 1 h ( 1 t ) d q t = f ( a ) + f ( b ) 0 1 h ( t ) d q t + 0 1 h ( 1 t ) d q t .
Finally, by (7) and (11), we derive
1 h 1 2 f a p + b p 2 1 p 1 ( b p a p ) a p b p f ( x 1 p ) a p d q x + a p b p f ( x 1 p ) b p d q x f ( a ) + f ( b ) 0 1 h ( t ) d q t + 0 1 h ( 1 t ) d q t .
The proof is completed. □
Remark 1.
If q 1 , then (5) reduces to ([20], Theorem 5).
Remark 2.
If q 1 , p = 1 and h ( t ) = t for all t [ 0 , 1 ] , then (5) reduces to (1).
Theorem 2.
Let f , g be ( p , h 1 ) -convex and ( p , h 2 ) -convex functions, respectively. Suppose that f , g are q-integrable, f g [ a , b ] and h 1 h 2 [ 0 , 1 ] . Then, we have
1 ( b p a p ) a p b p f ( x 1 p ) g ( x 1 p ) b p d q x f ( a ) g ( a ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t + f ( a ) g ( b ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t + f ( b ) g ( a ) 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t + f ( b ) g ( b ) 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t .
Proof. 
Since f , g are ( p , h 1 ) -convex and ( p , h 2 ) -convex functions, respectively, we get
f t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p h 1 ( t ) f ( a ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) f ( b )
and
g t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p h 2 ( t ) g ( a ) + h 2 ( 1 t ) g ( b ) ,
for any t [ 0 , 1 ] . Then we have
f t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p g t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p h 1 ( t ) f ( a ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) f ( b ) h 2 ( t ) g ( a ) + h 2 ( 1 t ) g ( b ) = h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) f ( a ) g ( a ) + h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) f ( a ) g ( b ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) f ( b ) g ( a ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) f ( b ) g ( b ) .
q-Integrating (15) over [ 0 , 1 ] , we obtain
0 1 f t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p g t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p d q t 0 1 h 1 ( t ) f ( a ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) f ( b ) h 2 ( t ) g ( a ) + h 2 ( 1 t ) g ( b ) d q t = f ( a ) g ( a ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t + f ( a ) g ( b ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t + f ( b ) g ( a ) 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t + f ( b ) g ( b ) 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t .
Using (3), we finally have
1 ( b p a p ) a p b p f ( x 1 p ) g ( x 1 p ) b p d q x f ( a ) g ( a ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t + f ( a ) g ( b ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t + f ( b ) g ( a ) 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t + f ( b ) g ( b ) 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t .
The proof is completed. □
Remark 3.
If q 1 , then (12) reduces to ([20], Theorem 6).
Theorem 3.
Let f , g be ( p , h 1 ) -convex and ( p , h 2 ) -convex functions, respectively. Suppose that f , g are q-integrable, f g [ a , b ] and h 1 h 2 [ 0 , 1 ] . Then we have
1 h 1 1 2 h 2 1 2 f a p + b p 2 1 p g a p + b p 2 1 p 1 ( b p a p ) a p b p f ( x 1 p ) g ( x 1 p ) a p d q x + a p b p f ( x 1 p ) g ( x 1 p ) b p d q x M ( a , b ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t + N ( a , b ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t ,
where M ( a , b ) = f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) and N ( a , b ) = f ( a ) g ( b ) + f ( b ) g ( a ) .
Proof. 
Since f is a ( p , h 1 ) -convex function and g is a ( p , h 2 ) -convex function, we have
f a p + b p 2 1 p h 1 1 2 f t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p + f t b p + ( 1 t ) a p 1 p
and
g a p + b p 2 1 p h 2 1 2 g t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p + g t b p + ( 1 t ) a p 1 p ,
respectively, for any t [ 0 , 1 ] . Then we get
f a p + b p 2 1 p g a p + b p 2 1 p h 1 1 2 h 2 1 2 f t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p g t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p + f t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p g t b p + ( 1 t ) a p 1 p + f t b p + ( 1 t ) a p 1 p g t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p + f t b p + ( 1 t ) a p 1 p g t b p + ( 1 t ) a p 1 p h 1 1 2 h 2 1 2 f t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p g t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p + f t b p + ( 1 t ) a p 1 p g t b p + ( 1 t ) a p 1 p + h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) f ( a ) g ( b ) + h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) f ( a ) g ( a ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) f ( b ) g ( b ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) f ( b ) g ( a ) + h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) f ( b ) g ( a ) + h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) f ( b ) g ( b ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) f ( a ) g ( a ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) f ( a ) g ( b ) = h 1 1 2 h 2 1 2 f t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p g t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p + f t b p + ( 1 t ) a p 1 p g t b p + ( 1 t ) a p 1 p + h 1 1 2 h 2 1 2 f ( a ) g ( b ) + f ( b ) g ( a ) h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) + f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) .
q-Integrating (17) over [ 0 , 1 ] , we obtain
0 1 f a p + b p 2 1 p g a p + b p 2 1 p d q t h 1 1 2 h 2 1 2 0 1 f t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p g t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p d q t + 0 1 f t b p + ( 1 t ) a p 1 p g t b p + ( 1 t ) a p 1 p d q t + h 1 1 2 h 2 1 2 M ( a , b ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t + N ( a , b ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t .
Finally, by using (3), we obtain
0 1 f a p + b p 2 1 p g a p + b p 2 1 p d q t h 1 1 2 h 2 1 2 1 ( b p a p ) a p b p f ( x 1 p ) g ( x 1 p ) b p d q x + 1 ( b p a p ) a p b p f ( x 1 p ) g ( x 1 p ) a p d q x + h 1 1 2 h 2 1 2 M ( a , b ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t + N ( a , b ) 0 1 ( h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t .
Therefore,
1 h 1 1 2 h 2 1 2 f a p + b p 2 1 p g a p + b p 2 1 p 1 ( b p a p ) a p b p f ( x 1 p ) g ( x 1 p ) a p d q x + a p b p f ( x 1 p ) g ( x 1 p ) b p d q x M ( a , b ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t + N ( a , b ) 0 1 ( h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t .
The proof is completed. □
Remark 4.
If q 1 , then (16) reduces to ([20], Theorem 7).
Theorem 4.
Let f , g be ( p , h 1 ) -convex and ( p , h 2 ) -convex functions, respectively, and let r be a function, is defined by r ( x ) = x 1 p . Suppose that f g [ a , b ] and h 1 h 2 [ 0 , 1 ] . Then, we have
1 ( b p a p ) 2 a p b p a p b p 0 1 f [ t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) r ( y ) p ] 1 p g [ t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) r ( y ) p ] 1 p d q t b p d q y b p d q x I 1 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t + I 2 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t ,
where
I 1 = f ( a ) g ( a ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t + f ( a ) g ( b ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t + f ( b ) g ( a ) 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t + f ( b ) g ( b ) 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t
and
I 2 = f ( a ) g ( a ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) d q t 0 1 h 2 ( t ) d q t + f ( a ) g ( b ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) d q t 0 1 h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t + f ( b ) g ( a ) 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) d q t 0 1 h 2 ( t ) d q t + f ( b ) g ( b ) 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) d q t 0 1 h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t .
Proof. 
Since f , g are ( p , h 1 ) -convex and ( p , h 2 ) -convex functions, respectively, we have
f [ t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) r ( y ) p ] 1 p h 1 ( t ) f r ( x ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) f r ( y ) = h 1 ( t ) f ( x 1 p ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) f ( y 1 p )
and
g [ t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) r ( y ) p ] 1 p h 2 ( t ) g r ( x ) + h 2 ( 1 t ) g r ( y ) h 2 ( t ) g ( x 1 p ) + h 2 ( 1 t ) g ( y 1 p )
for any t [ 0 , 1 ] . Then we have inequality
f [ t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) r ( y ) p ] 1 p g [ t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) r ( y ) p ] 1 p h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) f ( x 1 p ) g ( x 1 p ) + h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) f ( x 1 p ) g ( y 1 p ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) f ( y 1 p ) g ( x 1 p ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) f ( y 1 p ) g ( y 1 p ) .
q-Integrating both sides of above inequality over [ 0 , 1 ] and over [ a p , b p ] , then multiplying by 1 ( b p a p ) 2 , we get
1 ( b p a p ) 2 a p b p a p b p 0 1 f [ t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) r ( y ) p ] 1 p g [ t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) r ( y ) p ] 1 p d q t b p d q y b p d q x 1 ( b p a p ) 2 0 b p 0 b p 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) f ( x 1 p ) g ( x 1 p ) + h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) f ( x 1 p ) g ( y 1 p ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) f ( y 1 p ) g ( x 1 p ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) f ( y 1 p ) g ( y 1 p ) d q t b p d q y b p d q x = 1 ( b p a p ) 2 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t a p b p f ( x 1 p ) g ( x 1 p ) b p d q x a p b p 1 b p d q y + 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t a p b p f ( y 1 p ) g ( y 1 p ) b p d q y a p b p 1 b p d q x + 1 ( b p a p ) 2 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t a p b p f ( x 1 p ) b p d q x a p b p g ( y 1 p ) b p d q y + 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t a p b p f ( y 1 p ) b p d q x a p b p g ( x 1 p ) b p d q y = 1 ( b p a p ) 2 a p b p f ( x 1 p ) g ( x 1 p ) b p d q x a p b p 1 b p d q y 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t + 1 ( b p a p ) 2 a p b p f ( x 1 p ) b p d q x a p b p g ( y 1 p ) b p d q y 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t I 1 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t + I 2 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t .
The proof is completed. □
Theorem 5.
Suppose that f , g are ( p , h 1 ) -covex and ( p , h 2 ) -convex functions, respectively, and let r be a function, is defined by r ( x ) = x 1 p . If f g [ a , b ] and h 1 h 2 [ 0 , 1 ] , then we have
1 ( b p a p ) a p b p 0 1 f t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) a p + b p 2 1 p g t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) a p + b p 2 1 p d q t b p d q x I 1 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t + h 1 1 2 h 2 1 2 ( S ( a , b ) + T ( a , b ) ) 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t + I 3 S ( a , b ) + I 4 T ( a , b ) ,
where I 1 is defined in Theorem 4 and
S ( a , b ) = f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( a ) , T ( a , b ) = f ( b ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) , I 3 = h 2 1 2 0 1 h 1 ( t ) d q t 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t + h 1 1 2 0 1 h 2 ( t ) d q t 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t
and
I 4 = h 1 1 2 0 1 h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t + h 2 1 2 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) d q t 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t .
Proof. 
Since f , g are ( p , h 1 ) -covex and ( p , h 2 ) -convex functions, respectively, we get
f t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) a p + b p 2 1 p h 1 ( t ) f r ( x ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) f a p + b p 2 1 p = h 1 ( t ) f ( x 1 p ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) f a p + b p 2 1 p
and
g t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) a p + b p 2 1 p h 2 ( t ) g r ( x ) + h 2 ( 1 t ) g a p + b p 2 1 p = h 2 ( t ) g ( x 1 p ) + h 2 ( 1 t ) g a p + b p 2 1 p ,
for any t [ 0 , 1 ] . Then, we have inequality
f t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) a p + b p 2 1 p g t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) a p + b p 2 1 p h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) f ( x 1 p ) g ( x 1 p ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) f a p + b p 2 1 p g a p + b p 2 1 p + h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) f ( x 1 p ) g a p + b p 2 1 p + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) f a p + b p 2 1 p g ( x 1 p ) .
q-Integrating both sides of above expression over [ 0 , 1 ] and over [ a p , b p ] , then multiplying by 1 ( b p a p ) , we obtain
1 ( b p a p ) a p b p 0 1 f t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) a p + b p 2 1 p g t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) a p + b p 2 1 p d q t b p d q x 1 ( b p a p ) a p b p 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) f ( x 1 p ) g ( x 1 p ) + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) f a p + b p 2 1 p g a p + b p 2 1 p + h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) f ( x 1 p ) g a p + b p 2 1 p + h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) f a p + b p 2 1 p g ( x 1 p ) d q t b p d q x = 1 ( b p a p ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t a p b p f ( x 1 p ) g ( x 1 p ) b p d q x + 1 ( b p a p ) f a p + b p 2 1 p g a p + b p 2 1 p 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t a p b p 1 b p d q x + 1 ( b p a p ) g a p + b p 2 1 p 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t a p b p f ( x 1 p ) b p d q x + 1 ( b p a p ) f a p + b p 2 1 p 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t a p b p g ( x 1 p ) b p d q x .
Since
f a p + b p 2 1 p h 1 1 2 ( f ( a ) + f ( b ) )
and
g a p + b p 2 1 p h 2 1 2 ( g ( a ) + g ( b ) ) ,
we have
1 ( b p a p ) a p b p 0 1 f t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) a p + b p 2 1 p g t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) a p + b p 2 1 p d q t b p d q x 1 ( b p a p ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t a p b p f ( x 1 p ) g ( x 1 p ) b p d q x + h 1 1 2 h 2 1 2 ( f ( a ) + f ( b ) ) ( g ( a ) + g ( b ) ) 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t + 1 ( b p a p ) h 2 1 2 ( g ( a ) + g ( b ) ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t a p b p f ( x 1 p ) b p d q x + 1 ( b p a p ) h 1 1 2 ( f ( a ) + f ( b ) ) 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t 0 b p g ( x 1 p ) b p d q x .
Moreover, since
1 ( b p a p ) a p b p f ( x 1 p ) b p d q x = 0 1 f t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p d q t f ( a ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) d q t + f ( b ) 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) d q t ,
and similarly,
1 ( b p a p ) a p b p g ( x 1 p ) b p d q x = 0 1 g t a p + ( 1 t ) b p 1 p d q t g ( a ) 0 1 h 2 ( t ) d q t + g ( b ) 0 1 h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t ,
we get
1 ( b p a p ) a p b p 0 1 f t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) a p + b p 2 1 p g t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) a p + b p 2 1 p d q t b p d q x 1 ( b p a p ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t a p b p f ( x 1 p ) g ( x 1 p ) b p d q x + h 1 1 2 h 2 1 2 ( f ( a ) + f ( b ) ) ( g ( a ) + g ( b ) ) 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t + h 2 1 2 ( g ( a ) + g ( b ) ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t f ( a ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) d q t + f ( b ) 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) d q t + h 1 1 2 ( f ( a ) + f ( b ) ) 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t g ( a ) 0 1 h 2 ( t ) d q t + g ( b ) 0 1 h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t . = 1 ( b p a p ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t a p b p f ( x 1 p ) g ( x 1 p ) b p d q x + h 1 1 2 h 2 1 2 ( f ( a ) + f ( b ) ) ( g ( a ) + g ( b ) ) 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t + h 2 1 2 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( a ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) d q t + f ( b ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) × 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) d q t + h 1 1 2 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t ( f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( a ) ) 0 1 h 2 ( t ) d q t + ( f ( b ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) ) 0 1 h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t = 1 ( b p a p ) 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t a p b p f ( x 1 p ) g ( x 1 p ) b p d q x + ( f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( a ) + f ( a ) g ( b ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) ) h 1 1 2 h 2 1 2 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t + ( f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( a ) ) h 2 1 2 0 1 h 1 ( t ) d q t 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t + h 1 1 2 0 1 h 2 ( t ) d q t × 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t + ( f ( b ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) ) h 1 1 2 0 1 h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t + h 2 1 2 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) d q t 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t .
By Theorem 2, we have
1 ( b p a p ) a p b p 0 1 f t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) a p + b p 2 1 p g t r ( x ) p + ( 1 t ) a p + b p 2 1 p d q t b p d q x I 1 0 1 h 1 ( t ) h 2 ( t ) d q t + h 1 1 2 h 2 1 2 ( S ( a , b ) + T ( a , b ) ) 0 1 h 1 ( 1 t ) h 2 ( 1 t ) d q t + I 3 S ( a , b ) + I 4 T ( a , b ) .
The proof is completed. □

4. Examples

In this section, we give some examples to demonstrate our main results.
Example 3.
Define a function f : [ 0 , 1 ] R by f ( x ) = x p , where p is an odd natural number and h ( t ) = t 1 / 2 for 0 < t < 1 . We have f is ( p , h ) -convex, by Example 1. By applying Theorem 1 with q = 1 4 and p = 3 , the first inequality of (5) becomes
0.70710 1 1 2 1 / 2 0 + 1 2 1 1 0 0 1 x 0 d q x + 0 1 x 1 d q x = 1 .
The second inequality of (5) becomes
1 = 1 1 0 0 1 x 0 d q x + 0 1 x 1 d q x 0 + 1 0 1 t 1 / 2 d q t + 0 1 ( 1 t ) 1 / 2 d q t 1.08044 .
It is clear that
0.70710 1 1.08044 ,
which demonstrates the result described in Theorem 1.
Example 4.
Define function f , g : [ 0 , 1 ] R by f ( x ) = x p , where p is an odd natural number, g ( x ) = 1 and h 1 ( t ) = t 1 / 2 , h 2 ( t ) = t for 0 < t < 1 . Examples 1 and 2, we have f , g is ( p , h 1 ) , ( p , h 2 ) -convex, respectively. By applying Theorem 2 with q = 1 4 and p = 3 , we get
0.2 = 1 ( 1 0 ) 0 1 x 1 d q x f ( 0 ) g ( 0 ) 0 1 t 1 / 2 t d q t + f ( 0 ) g ( 1 ) 0 1 t 1 / 2 ( 1 t ) d q t + f ( 1 ) g ( 0 ) 0 1 ( 1 t ) 1 / 2 t d q t + f ( 1 ) g ( 1 ) 0 1 ( 1 t ) 1 / 2 ( 1 t ) d q t . 0.04362 + 0.17966 = 0.22328 .
It is clear that
0.2 0.22328 ,
which demonstrates the result described in Theorem 2.
Example 5.
Define function f , g : [ 0 , 1 ] R by f ( x ) = x p , where p is an odd natural number, g ( x ) = 1 and h 1 ( t ) = t 1 / 2 , h 2 ( t ) = t for 0 < t < 1 . Examples 1 and 2, we have f , g is ( p , h 1 ) , ( p , h 2 ) -convex, respectively. By applying Theorem 3 with q = 1 4 and p = 3 , we get
0.41421 1 1 2 1 / 2 1 2 0 + 1 2 0 + 1 2 1 ( 1 0 ) 0 1 x 0 d q x + 0 1 x 1 d q x M ( 0 , 1 ) 0 1 t 1 / 2 ( 1 t ) + ( 1 t ) 1 / 2 t d q t + N ( 0 , 1 ) 0 1 t 1 / 2 t + ( 1 t ) 1 / 2 ( 1 t ) d q t 0.12657 + 0.95386 = 1.14652 .
It is clear that
0.41421 1.14652 ,
which demonstrates the result described in Theorem 3.
Example 6.
Define function f , g : [ 0 , 1 ] R by f ( x ) = x p , where p is an odd natural number, g ( x ) = 1 and h 1 ( t ) = t 1 / 2 , h 2 ( t ) = t for 0 < t < 1 . Examples 1 and 2, we have f , g is ( p , h 1 ) , ( p , h 2 ) -convex, respectively. By applying Theorem 4 with q = 1 4 and p = 3 , we get
0.2 = 0 1 0 1 0 1 t x + ( 1 t ) y d q t 1 d q y 1 d q x I 1 0 1 t 1 / 2 t + ( 1 t ) 1 / 2 ( 1 t ) d q t + I 2 0 1 ( 1 t ) 1 / 2 d q t 0 1 t d q t + 0 1 ( 1 t ) 1 / 2 d q t 0 1 ( 1 t ) d q t 0.22329 ( 0.77419 + 0.17967 ) + 0.22329 ( 0.08295 + 0.04362 ) = 0.24125 .
It is clear that
0.2 0.24125 ,
which demonstrates the result described in Theorem 4.
Example 7.
Define function f , g : [ 0 , 1 ] R by f ( x ) = x p , where p is an odd natural number, g ( x ) = 1 and h 1 ( t ) = t 1 / 2 , h 2 ( t ) = t for 0 < t < 1 . Examples 1 and 2, we have f , g is ( p , h 1 ) , ( p , h 2 ) -convex, respectively. By applying Theorem 5 with q = 1 4 and p = 3 , we get
0.26 = 1 ( 1 0 ) 0 1 0 1 t x + ( 1 t ) 0 + 1 2 d q t 1 d q x I 3 0 1 t 1 / 2 t d q t + 1 2 1 / 2 1 2 ( S ( 0 , 1 ) + T ( 0 , 1 ) ) × 0 1 ( 1 t ) 1 2 ( 1 t ) d q t + ( S ( 0 , 1 ) × I 4 ) + ( T ( 0 , 1 ) × I 5 ) ( 0.22329 × 0.77419 ) + 1 2 1 / 2 1 2 ( 3 × 0.17967 ) + ( 1 × 0.06023 ) + ( 2 × 0.01539 ) = 0.28294
It is clear that
0.26 0.28294 ,
which demonstrates the result described in Theorem 5.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, we prove a variant of inequalities for ( p , h ) -convex function via q-calculus. We start with the necessary lemma and then use the key lemma to derive the main theorems. The results obtained in this paper generalize previous work in the earlier work if we take limit q tends to 1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.K. and K.N.; formal analysis, J.K., F.W., K.N. and H.B.; funding acquisition, K.N.; investigation, J.K., F.W., K.N. and H.B.; validation, J.K., F.W., K.N. and H.B.; visualization, J.K., F.W., K.N. and H.B.; writing—original draft, J.K., F.W. and K.N.; writing—review and editing, K.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank anonymous referees for comments which are helpful for improvement in this paper. This research is supported by Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Fiscal Year 2023.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jackson, F.H. On a q-definite integrals. Q. J. Pure Appl. Math. 1910, 41, 193–203. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jackson, F.H. q-difference equations. Am. J. Math. 1910, 32, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bangerezaka, G. Variational q-calculus. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2004, 289, 650–665. [Google Scholar]
  4. Annyby, H.M.; Mansour, S.K. q-Fractional Calculus and Equations; Springer: Helidelberg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ernst, T. A Comprehensive Treatment of q-Calculus; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ernst, T. A History of q-Calculus and a New Method; UUDM Report; Uppsala University: Uppsala, Sweden, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gauchman, H. Integral inequalities in q-calculus. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2002, 47, 281–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kac, V.; Cheung, P. Quantum Calculus; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tariboon, J.; Ntouyas, S.K. Quantum calculus on finite intervals and applications to impulsive difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013, 2013, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Tariboon, J.; Ntouyas, S.K. Quantum integral inequalities on finite intervals. J. Inequal. Appl. 2014, 2014, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bermudo, S.; Korus, P.; Valdes, J.E.N. On q-Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for general convex functions. Acta Math. Hung. 2020, 162, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hermite, C. Sur deux limites d’une integrale definie. Mathesis 1883, 3, 82. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hadamard, J. Etude sur les fonctions entiees et en particulier d’une fonction consideree par Riemann. J. Math. Pures Appl. 1893, 58, 171–215. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kunt, M.; Latif, M.A.; Iscan, I.; Dragomir, S.S. Quantum Hermite-Hadamard type inequality and some estimates of quantum midpoint type inequalities for double integrals. Sigma J. Eng. Nat. Sci. 2019, 37, 207–223. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kalsoom, H.; Wu, J.D.; Hussain, S.; Latif, M.A. Simpson’s type inequalities for co-ordinated convex functions on quantum calculus. Symmetry 2019, 11, 768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kalsoom, H.; Idrees, M.; Baleanu, D.; Chu, Y.-M. New estimates of q1q2-Ostrowski-type inequalities within a class of n-polynomial prevexity of functions. J. Funct. Spaces 2020, 2020, 3720798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Latif, M.A.; Dragomir, S.S.; Momoniat, E. Some q-analogues of Hermite-Hadamard inequality of functions of two variables on finite rectangles in the plane. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2017, 29, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Budak, H.; Ali, M.A.; Tarhanaci, M. Some new quantum Hermite-Hadamard-like inequalities for coordinated convex functions. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 2020, 186, 899–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wannalookkhee, F.; Nonlaopon, K.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Sarikaya, M.Z.; Budak, H.; Ali, M.A. Some new quantum Hermite–Hadamard inequalities for co-ordinated convex functions. Mathematics 2022, 10, 1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fang, Z.B.; Shi, R. On the (p, h)-convex function and some integral inequalities. J. Inequal. Appl. 2014, 2014, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kantalo, J.; Wannalookkhee, F.; Nonlaopon, K.; Budak, H. Some Quantum Integral Inequalities for (p, h)-Convex Functions. Mathematics 2023, 11, 1072. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11051072

AMA Style

Kantalo J, Wannalookkhee F, Nonlaopon K, Budak H. Some Quantum Integral Inequalities for (p, h)-Convex Functions. Mathematics. 2023; 11(5):1072. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11051072

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kantalo, Jirawat, Fongchan Wannalookkhee, Kamsing Nonlaopon, and Hüseyin Budak. 2023. "Some Quantum Integral Inequalities for (p, h)-Convex Functions" Mathematics 11, no. 5: 1072. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11051072

APA Style

Kantalo, J., Wannalookkhee, F., Nonlaopon, K., & Budak, H. (2023). Some Quantum Integral Inequalities for (p, h)-Convex Functions. Mathematics, 11(5), 1072. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11051072

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop