1. Introduction and Statement of the Main Results
In 1900, David Hilbert [
1] shared a list of twenty-three problems at the International Congress of Mathematicians in Paris. From this list of problems, the sixteenth Hilbert problem is one of the remaining unsolved problems, together with the Riemann conjecture. The sixteenth Hilbert problem asks for the maximum number of limit cycles of a class of planar polynomial differential systems with a given degree. Recall that an isolated periodic orbit inside a planar differential system’s set of all periodic orbits is known as a limit cycle. In the qualitative study, one of the main problems of planar differential systems is determining the existence and the maximum number of limit cycles, see [
2,
3]. This importance comes from the main role of limit cycles for understanding and explaining the behavior of a given differential system, such as the limit cycle of the Belousov Zhavotinskii model [
4] or the one of the Van der Pol equations [
5,
6], etc.
This work focuses on a class of planar PDS with two pieces, where the separation curve is the straight line
. Then, following the Filippov [
7] conventions for defining this class of systems on the discontinuity line
, these PDS can be written as follows
such that
, and
. These systems can exhibit either crossing limit cycles or sliding limit cycles. Here, we are only interested in the crossing ones, which are isolated periodic orbits having exactly two crossing points, i.e., the limit cycle intersects the straight line
in two points
with
such that
for
. Rather than saying “crossing limit cycle”, we will refer to it as “limit cycle”.
In the 1920s, Andronov and coworkers [
8] started the serious study of PDS. Nowadays, these systems are a more important research subject for many scientists. This is due to the relevant applications of PDS to model many problems in mechanics, economics, control theory, medicine, biology, etc., as we can see in [
9,
10,
11].
In recent years, several authors have paid more attention to the simplest class of PDS, the ones separated by a straight line and consequently formed by two pieces, having a linear differential system in each piece; see [
12,
13,
14], as well as the references cited in these works. Since all the results in the published papers provide only examples of planar PDS with at most three limit cycles, it still needs to be discovered whether three is the maximum number of limit cycles for this class of systems. Recently, Benterki and Llibre [
15] studied the extension of the 16th Hilbert problem to PDS having isochronous centers of degree one or three. Then, from here, we build the main objective of this paper, where we study the problem of the existence and the maximum number of limit cycles for two different families of PDS separated by the straight line
.
We denote by the family of PDS separated the straight line on two pieces. In one piece, there is an arbitrary linear differential center. In the other one, there is a Hamiltonian nilpotent center formed by a linear plus cubic homogeneous polynomial after an arbitrary affine change in the variables.
We denote by the family of PDS separated by the straight line on two pieces; in each piece, there is an arbitrary Hamiltonian nilpotent center formed by a linear plus cubic homogeneous polynomials after an arbitrary affine change in the variables.
We shall use the following lemma for the first family of planar differential systems, which provides the normal form of any arbitrary linear differential center.
Lemma 1. By conducting a linear change in the variables and a rescaling of the independent variable, any linear center in can be expressed as followswith , and its first integral is Our results use the previous results of [
16] as follows.
Theorem 1. After doing a linear change of variables and rescaling of the independent variable, every Hamiltonian planar polynomial differential system with linear plus cubic homogeneous terms has a nilpotent center at the origin that can be expressed as one of the following six classes:
, with .
, with and .
, with either and , or , , and ( or simply we can take ).
, with either and , or , , and (, or we can simply take ).
, with either and , or , , and (, or we can simply take ).
, with either and , or , , and (, or we can simply take ).
Here, , and .
Our main results are the following seven theorems.
Theorem 2. The maximum number of limit cycles of the family is one. This maximum is reached in all the classes; see Figure 1 and Figure 2. Theorem 3. The maximum number of limit cycles of systems of the family formed by a Hamiltonian nilpotent center in one region and by one of the Hamiltonian nilpotent centers with in the other region is four. For every class, this maximum is achieved; see Figure 3 and Figure 4. Theorem 4. The maximum number of limit cycles of systems of the family formed by a Hamiltonian nilpotent center in one region and by one of the Hamiltonian nilpotent centers with in the other region is four. For every class, this maximum is achieved; see Figure 5 and Figure 6. Theorem 5. The maximum number of limit cycles of systems of the family formed by a Hamiltonian nilpotent center in one region and by one of the Hamiltonian nilpotent centers with in the other region is four. For every class, this maximum is achieved; see Figure 7 and Figure 8. Theorem 6. The maximum number of limit cycles of systems of the family formed by a Hamiltonian nilpotent center in one region and by one of the Hamiltonian nilpotent centers with in the other region is four. This maximum is achieved for all the classes, see Figure 9. Theorem 7. The maximum number of limit cycles of systems of the family formed by a Hamiltonian nilpotent center in one region and by one of the Hamiltonian nilpotent centers or in the other region is four. For any class, this maximum is achieved; see Figure 10. Theorem 8. The maximum number of limit cycles of systems of the family formed by a Hamiltonian nilpotent center in each region is four. This maximum is achieved; see Figure 11. 4. Numerical Examples of Theorem 2
One limit cycle for the class formed by system (
2) and (
4). In what follows, we give a PDS of the class (
2) and (
4) with exactly one limit cycle. In
, we consider the nilpotent center
of the form (
4); this system has the first integral
In
, we consider the linear differential system
which has
as a first integral. Now, we focus on the solutions of system (11) with
satisfying
. The unique solution of (11) is
and it provides the unique limit cycle of PDS (12) and (13) shown in
Figure 1a.
One limit cycle for the class formed by system (
2) and (
5). Here, we take the nilpotent center (
5) in the left region
whixh has
as the first integral, and we take the linear differential center in the right region
with its first integral
For PDS (14) and (15), the unique solution of system (11) with
such that
is
. This proves the uniqueness of the limit cycle of PDS (14) and (15), see
Figure 1b.
One limit cycle for the class formed by system (
2) and (
6). In the right region
, we place the differential nilpotent center
of the form (
6), with the first integral
In the left region
, we place the linear differential center
with its first integral
The PDS formed by the differential centers (16) and (17) has exactly one limit cycle, because system (11), when
, has exactly one real solution
satisfying
, namely
, that provides the unique limit cycle shown in
Figure 1c.
One limit cycle for the class formed by system (
2) and (
7). In
, we consider the nilpotent center
of type (
7), with the first integral
In
, we consider
the linear center, with its first integral
Since system (11), when
, has exactly one real solution
satisfying
, then the PDS formed by the differential centers (18) and (19) has exactly one limit cycle shown in
Figure 2a.
One limit cycle for the class formed by system (
2) and (
8). In
, we consider the nilpotent center
of type (
8), which has the first integral
In
, we consider
the linear differential center, with its first integral
For PDS (20) and (21), the unique solution of system (11) with
such that
is
. This proves the uniqueness of the limit cycle of PDS (20) and (21), see
Figure 2b.
One limit cycle for the class formed by system (
2) and (
9). We consider the cubic nilpotent center of the form (
9) in
with its first integral
In the region
, we consider the linear differential center
with the first integral
The PDS formed by the differential centers (22) and (23) has one limit cycle, because system (11), when
, has exactly one real solution
satisfying
, namely
, which provides the limit cycle shown in
Figure 2c.
5. Proof of Theorems 3–8
In this section, we prove Theorems 3–8 for the class formed by system - and by system -, where and .
In the right region, we consider the general Hamiltonian cubic differential system with a nilpotent center
such that
with its first integral
. Now, by replacing the parameters
with the parameters
in system
and in its first integral, we obtain a second Hamiltonian cubic differential system with a nilpotent center
with its corresponding first integral
in the left region. If the PDS
-
has a limit cycle, this limit cycle must cross the separation line
at a pair of distinct points
and
, where
. Moreover,
and
must satisfy the following system
where the two polynomials
and
for all
are of degree three. Due to the Bézout Theorem (see for instance, [
17]), nine is the maximum number of the solutions of system (24). According to the symmetry of the solutions of this system, we know that four is the maximum number of solutions of system (24) satisfying
. Hence, there are at most four limit cycles for the PDS
-
, with
.
For the class
-
, with
and
, we consider in the first region the Hamiltonian cubic nilpotent center
with its first integral
. In the second region, we consider the Hamiltonian cubic nilpotent center
with its first integral
. If the PDS
-
has a limit cycle, this limit cycle must cross the separation line
at a pair of distinct points
and
where
. Moreover, the points
and
must satisfy the next system
where
and
are are cubic polynomials. Based on the symmetry of that system’s solutions and the Bézout Theorem, the maximum number of solutions of system (25) that satisfy
is at most four. Thus, there are a maximum of four limit cycles for the PDS
-
.
6. Numerical Examples of Theorem 3
Four limit cycles for the class formed by (
4)-
. In the right region
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
with its first integral
In the left region
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
that has the first integral
The four real solutions of system (24) with
satisfying
, which provide four limit cycles for PDS (26) and (27) shown in
Figure 3a, are the set
given by
Four limit cycles for the class formed by system (
4) and (
5). In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
4), with its first integral
In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
5), with the first integral
The four real solutions of system (25) with
and
satisfying
, which provide four limit cycles for the PDS (28) and (29) shown in
Figure 3b, are the set
given by
Four limit cycles for the class formed by system (
4) and (
6). In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
4), with the first integral
In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
6), with the first integral
The four real solutions of system (25) with
and
satisfying
, which provide the four limit cycles for the PDS (30) and (31) shown in
Figure 3c, are the set
given by
Four limit cycles for the class formed by system (
4) and (
7). In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
4), with the first integral
In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
7), with the first integral
The four real solutions of system (25) with
and
satisfying
, which provide the four limit cycles for the PDS (32) and (33) shown in
Figure 4a, are the set
given by
Four limit cycles for the class formed by system (
4) and (
8). In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
4), with the first integral
In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
8), with the first integral
The four real solutions of system (25) with
and
satisfying
, which provide the four limit cycles for the PDS (34) and (35) shown in
Figure 4b, are the set
given by
Four limit cycles for the class formed by system (
4) and (
9). In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
4), with the first integral
In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
9), with the first integral
The four real solutions of system (25) with
and
satisfying
, which provide the four limit cycles for the PDS (36) and (37) shown in
Figure 4c, are the set
given by
7. Numerical Examples of Theorem 4
Four limit cycles for the class formed by system (
5)-
. In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
with its first integral
In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
which has the first integral
The four real solutions of system (24) with
satisfying
, which provide the four limit cycles for the PDS (38) and (39) shown in
Figure 5a, are the set
given by
Four limit cycles for the class formed by system (
5) and (
6). In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
5), with the first integral
In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
5), with the first integral
The four real solutions of system (25) with
and
satisfying
, which provide the four limit cycles for the PDS (40) and (41) shown in
Figure 5b, are the set
given by
Four limit cycles for the class formed by system (
5) and (
7). In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
5), with the first integral
In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
7), with the first integral
The four real solutions of system (25) with
and
satisfying
, which provide the four limit cycles for the PDS (42) and (43) shown in
Figure 5c, are the set
given by
Four limit cycles for the class formed by system (
5) and (
8). In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
5), with the first integral
In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
8), with the first integral
The four real solutions of system (25) with
and
satisfying
, which provide the four limit cycles for the PDS (44) and (45) shown in
Figure 6a, are the set
given by
Four limit cycles for the class formed by system (
5) and (
9). In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
5), with the first integral
In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
9), with the first integral
The four real solutions of system (25) with
and
satisfying
, which provide the four limit cycles for the PDS (46) and (47) shown in
Figure 6b, are the set
given by
8. Numerical Examples of Theorem 5
Four limit cycles for the class formed by system (
6)-
. In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
with its first integral
In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
which has the first integral
The four real solutions of system (24) with
satisfying
, which provide the four limit cycles for the PDS (48) and (49) shown in
Figure 7a, are the set
given by
Four limit cycles for the class formed by system (
6) and (
7). In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
6), with the first integral
In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
7), with the first integral
The four real solutions of system (25) with
and
satisfying
, which provide the four limit cycles for the PDS (50) and (51) shown in
Figure 7b, are the set
given by
Four limit cycles for the class formed by system (
6) and (
8). In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
6), with the first integral
In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
8), with the first integral
The four real solutions of system (25) with
and
satisfying
, which provide four limit cycles for the PDS (52) and (53) shown in
Figure 8a, are the set
given by
Four limit cycles for the class formed by system (
6) and (
9). In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
6), with the first integral
In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
9), with the first integral
The four real solutions of system (25) with
and
satisfying
, which provide the four limit cycles for the PDS (54) and (55) shown in
Figure 8b, are the set
given by
9. Numerical Examples of Theorem 6
Four limit cycles for the class formed by system (
7)-
. In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
with its first integral
In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
which has the first integral
The four real solutions of system (24) with
satisfying
, which provide the four limit cycles for the PDS (56) and (57) shown in
Figure 9a, are the set
given by
Four limit cycles for the class formed by system (
7) and (
8). In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
7), with the first integral
In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
8), with the first integral
The four real solutions of system (25) with
and
satisfying
, which provide the four limit cycles for the PDS (58) and (59) shown in
Figure 9b, are the set
given by
Four limit cycles for the class formed by system (
7) and (
9). In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
7), with the first integral
In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
9), with the first integral
The four real solutions of system (25) with
and
satisfying
, which provide the four limit cycles for the PDS (60) and (61) shown in
Figure 9c, are the set
given by
10. Numerical Examples of Theorem 7
Four limit cycles for the class formed by system (
8)-
. In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
with its first integral
In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
which has the first integral
The four real solutions of system (24) with
satisfying
, which provide the four limit cycles for the PDS (62) and (63) shown in
Figure 10a, are the set
given by
Four limit cycles for the class formed by system (
8) and (
9). In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
8), with the first integral
In
, we consider the cubic nilpotent center
of type (
9), with the first integral
The four real solutions of system (25) with
and
satisfying
, which provide the four limit cycles for the PDS (64) and (65) shown in
Figure 10b, are the set
given by