Next Article in Journal
Fitting Penalized Estimator for Sparse Covariance Matrix with Left-Censored Data by the EM Algorithm
Previous Article in Journal
3F4 Hypergeometric Functions as a Sum of a Product of 1F2 Functions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Privacy-Preserving Incentive Allocation for Fair and Resilient Data Sharing in Resource-Constrained Edge Computing Networks

1
State Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
2
Guizhou Institute of Technology, Guiyang 550003, China
3
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2025, 13(3), 422; https://doi.org/10.3390/math13030422
Submission received: 25 December 2024 / Revised: 20 January 2025 / Accepted: 25 January 2025 / Published: 27 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Network and Edge Computing)

Abstract

Efficient and secure data sharing is paramount for advancing modern digital ecosystems, especially within edge computing environments characterized by resource-constrained nodes and dynamic network topologies. In such settings, privacy preservation, computational efficiency, and system resilience are critical for user engagement and overall system performance. However, existing approaches face three primary challenges: (i) limited optimization of privacy protection and absence of dynamic privacy budget scheduling for resource-constrained scenarios, (ii) static incentive mechanisms that overlook individual differences in data quality and resource consumption, and (iii) inadequate strategies to ensure resilience in environments with limited resources and unstable networks. This paper introduces the Federated Learning-based Dynamic Incentive Allocation Framework (FL-DIAF) to address these issues. FL-DIAF integrates differential privacy into the federated learning paradigm deployed on edge nodes, enabling collaborative model training that safeguards individual data privacy while maintaining computational efficiency and system resilience. Additionally, the framework employs a Shapley value-based dynamic incentive allocation model to ensure equitable and transparent distribution of incentives by accurately quantifying each participant’s contribution within an elastic edge computing infrastructure. Comprehensive experimental evaluations on diverse datasets demonstrate that FL-DIAF achieves a 9.573% reduction in the objective function value under typical conditions and attains a 100% task completion rate across all tested resilient edge scenarios.
Keywords: federated learning; dynamic incentive allocation; privacy protection; resource optimization; Shapley value federated learning; dynamic incentive allocation; privacy protection; resource optimization; Shapley value

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Li, S.; Chen, K.; Guo, R.; Li, J. Privacy-Preserving Incentive Allocation for Fair and Resilient Data Sharing in Resource-Constrained Edge Computing Networks. Mathematics 2025, 13, 422. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13030422

AMA Style

Wang Y, Li S, Chen K, Guo R, Li J. Privacy-Preserving Incentive Allocation for Fair and Resilient Data Sharing in Resource-Constrained Edge Computing Networks. Mathematics. 2025; 13(3):422. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13030422

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yanfang, Shaobo Li, Kangkun Chen, Ran Guo, and Judy Li. 2025. "Privacy-Preserving Incentive Allocation for Fair and Resilient Data Sharing in Resource-Constrained Edge Computing Networks" Mathematics 13, no. 3: 422. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13030422

APA Style

Wang, Y., Li, S., Chen, K., Guo, R., & Li, J. (2025). Privacy-Preserving Incentive Allocation for Fair and Resilient Data Sharing in Resource-Constrained Edge Computing Networks. Mathematics, 13(3), 422. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13030422

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop